Full text of "The Auk"
Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at|http: //books .google .com/I
CONTmUATIOM Of THE
(uiuTiN OF THE nmuL omlTHOLOeiCAl CLU1
The Auk
3 €iuartctlf journal of CDrnftliologf
: —JILHrfJAS-T, 1803- ITa X
wm
e NUTTALL Orm
The Auk
a £5uartEtlt journal of flDrnit^ologr
VOLUME XX
PUBLISHED BV
The American Ornithologists* Union
CAMBRIDGE. MASS.
18S mail innlter in the Poet Office at Boston, Mass,
• • •
• I
• • •
• • •••
• •
'• • •
• • •
..• •
••••1
• •
•.•
• • • •
•••
•;:
• • •'
• • •
• • • •
• • •
■•••••••
• t ••• •
• • • •
•• • • •
• • • • •
,• • ••• •
• • •
• • •••
• • • «• •
• •
•• •
» •
» •
CONTENTS OF VOLUME XX.
NUMBER I.
Pagb.
»The a. O. U. Check-List — Its History and Its Future. By
J. A, Allen i
Birds of Porto Rico. B7 B. S. Bowdish, (Concluded.) . 10
Migration of Richardson* s Grouse. By A, W. Anthony, , 24
An Ornithological Visit to Los Coronados Islands, Lower
California. By J. Grinnell and F. S. Daggett. . 27
The Vernacular Names of Birds. By Edwin W, Doran, Ph.D, 38
Arizona Bird Notes. By Herbert Brown 43
Notes Concerning Certain Birds of Long Island, N. Y. By
William C. Braislin^ M. D, 50
The Diary of a Cardinal's Nest. By Gertrude Fay Harvey,
(Plate I.) 54
An Epidemic of Roup in the Canandaigua Crow Roost. By
Elon Howard Eaton, (Plate II) 57
Twentieth Congress of the American Ornithologists'
Union. By John H. Sage, 59
GENERAL NOTES.
Breeding Grounds of the Black and Socorro Petrels. — A Correction,
63 ; a Hybrid Duck, 64 ; The Wood Ibis again in Colorado, 65 ;
The Stilt Sandpiper in Knox County, Maine, 65 ; Massachusetts
Breeding Dates for Bartramia lottgicauda^^s \ Recent Records of
the Wild Pigeon, 66; Turkey Vulture at Moose Factory, James
Bay, 66; Black Vulture at Taunton, Mass., 67; Golden Eagle in
Middle Southern Ohio, 67 ; Richardson's Merlin {Falco columba-
rius richardsonii) on the Coast of South Carolina, 67 ; The Barn
Owl on Long Island, 67 ; Barn Owl in Northern Ohio, 67 ; Yel-
low-billed Cuckoo's Egg in a Robin's Nest, 68 ; Breeding of the
Alder Flycatcher {Empidonax trailli alnorum) near Plainfield,
N. J., r>8 ; Western Evening Grosbeak Nesting in Mexico, 68;
Another Record of Thryothorus ludovicianus in Massachusetts,
69; The Blue-gray Gnat-catcher in Massachusetts, 69; Ohio
Notes, 70 ; Birds Killed by Hailstones, 70 ; Vernacular Names of
Birds, 70.
RECENT LITERATURE.
Ridgwav's 'Birds of North and Middle America,' Part II, 73; Mrs.
Bailey's ' Handbook of Birds of the Western United States,* 76;
Brewster's 'Birds of the Cape Region of Lower California,' 78;
Henshaw's 'Birds of the Hawaiian Islands,' 80; Snodgrass and
Heller on the Birds of Clipperton and Cocos Islands, 81 ; Knight's
'The Birds of Wyoming,' 82; Henninger's List of the Birds of
Middle Southern 'Ohio, 83; Blatchley's 'A Nature Wooing,' 83;
Keyser's 'Birds of the Rockies,' 84; Burroughs's *John James
Audubon,' 85 ; Strong on the Development of Color in Feathers,
86; Publications Received, 89.
7 5^\^
!▼ Contents of Volume XX,
NOTES AND NEWS.
Obituarv: Dr. James C. Merrill, 90; Dr. Emil Holiib, 92 ; Chester
Barlow, 93 ; Ludwig Kumlien, 93 ; Curtis Clay Young, 94 ; Perry
O. Simons, 94. Announcements of new Publications, 96 ; The
Mcllwraith Ornithological Club, 98; Third Annual Conference
of Audubon Societies, 99.
SUPPLEMENT.
Report op the A. O. U. Committee on the Protection
OP North American Birds. By William Dutcher. (Plates
III and IV.) 101
NUMBER II.
Pa(;b.
The Domestic Affairs of Bob-white. By John N. Clark. 161
Occurrence of the Empkror Goose in Hawaii. By //. W,
Henskaw 164
Preserving Kt^yiLiBRii'M by the Use of one Wing. Bv William
Hubbell Fisker. (Piute VII.) .....'.. 167
Bird Migration at Some of the Bahama Lighthouses. By/.
I^exis Bonkotfy M. A., F. Z. S, /,., M. B, O. U. . 169
A List of thk Land Birds of Lake Valley, Central Sikkra
Nevada Mointains, California. By Milton S. Ray, (Plates
VIII and IX.) 180
Food Habits of Some Wf.st Indian Birds. By /?. 5. Bowdish, 193
A Review of the Genus Catherpes. By Harry C, Oberkolser, 196
A Synopsis of the Gknus Psaltriparus. By Harry C. Ober-
kolser, . . ...... ... 19$
A List of Land Birds from Cf.ntral Washington. By Robert
E. Snodg'rass. . , . . . ' . . 202
GENERAL NOTES.
The Dovckie {Allr alle) on Long Island, N. Y., 209; A Hybrid Duck,
Anas boscktis X Xettion carolincnsis, 209; A Correction, 210;
Wood Ibis in Montana, 210; Woodcock Notes, 210; A Turnstone
{Arenaria inter^rrs) Taken in the Mid-Pacific, iio; Nesting of
the Goshawk in Southern New Hampshire, 211; Barn Owl on
Long Island, N. V., 212 ; The Short-eared Owl (Asio accipitrinns)
Taken Far Out at Sea, 212 ; Note on Ftittacnla modesta Cabanis,
213: Breeding of the Evening Grosbeak in Captivity, 213; A Fur-
ther Note of the Subspecies of Passf renins sandwickensis inhabit-
ing Labrador, 215: A Winter Record for the Chewink on Long
Island, N. Y., 216; Note on Sylvia ctrrnlea Wilson, 216; A Late
Fall Record for the Cape May Warbler {Dendrotca iigrina) in
Eastern MaKsachusetts, 218; Late Records for Eastern Matsachu-
•etts, 218; A CaKe of Mistaken Diagnosis, 218.
Contents of Volume XX.
RECENT LITERATURE.
Ornithological Magazines. • The Condor/ * Bird-Lore,' ' The Wilson
Bulletin,' 219; Jacobs's *The Story of a Martin Colony/ 226;
Pycraft on *The Significance of the Condition of Young Birds at
Birth,' 227; Strone^ on a Case of Abnormal Plumage, 228;
Trowbridge on *The Relation of Wind to Bird Migration,'
228; Richmond on Birds from the Andaman and Nicobar
Islands, 229; Richmond on Birds from the Coast and Islands of
Northwest Sumatra, 230; Fisher on a New Tern from Necker
Island, 230 ; Bonhote's ' Field Notes on Some Bahama Birds,'
230; Mrs. Wheelock's 'Nestlings of Forest and Marsh/ 231;
Proceedings of the Delaware Valley Ornithological Club, 231;
Publications Received, 232.
CORRESPONDENCE.
Some Suggestions, 234 ; Vernacular Names of Birds, 236 ; A Rare
Work on American Ornithology, 236.
NOTES AND NEWS.
Obituary : Thomas Mcllwraith, 242 ; John Nathaniel Clark, 242 ;
Edward Stanley Waters, 243. The Michigan Ornithological
Club, 244; Vermont Bird Club, 244; Proposed A. O. U. Meeting,
to be held in California, 245 ; Bird Groups at the American
Museum of Natural History, 246; Work of the A. O. U. Bird
Protection Committee, 246.
NUMBER III.
Pagb.
Notes on the Ornithological Observations of Peter Kalm.
By Spencer Trotter 249
Notes on the Birds of Madison County, New York, with
Especial Reference to Embody's Recent List. By Wil-
liam Maxon. ........... 262
Notes on Winter Crow Life in the Delaware Valley. By
Witmer Stone 267
On the Generic Names of the North American Owls. By
Witmer Stone 272
Notes on the Birds of the Cariboo District, British Colum-
bia. By Allan Brooks, (Plate X.) 277
Notes on the Habits of Certain Venezuelan Birds. By
Austin H. Clark 285
Recognition of Geographic Variation in Nomenclature.
By Lever ett Mills Loom is 294
The California Meeting of the American Ornithologists'
Union. By/. A. Allen 299
vi Contents of Volume XX.
GENERAL NOTES.
Great Black-backed Gull in Oneida County, N. Y., 303 ; Additional
Records of the European Widgeon (Mareca penelope) in Indiana,
303; Hybrid Duck — Mallard {Anas boschas) -^PiniViW {Dajila
acMta), 303 ; The King Rail in Plymouth County, Mass., 304;
Early Record for the Piping Plover {ySgialitis me'loda) in Rhode
Island, 305 ; Richardson's Owl {Nyctala tengmalmi richardsoni)
in Illinois, 305 ; Nesting of the Red-bellied Woodpecker in Har-
ford County, Md.,305 ; A Much Mated House Sparrow, 306 ; The
Louisiana water-Thrush in Minnesota, 307; Lophopkanes vs.
Bmolophus^ 308: Balancing with One Wing, 308; Ohio Notes,
309 ; Louisiana Migration Notes, 309.
RECENT LITERATURE.
Mudge on the Tongue Muscles of Parrots, 310 ; Winkenwerder on the
Migration of Birds, 311 ; North American Water- Fowl, 313 ; The
*New* Edition of Nuttall, 314; Scott's *The Story of a Bird
Lover,- 315; Mrs. BignelFs * My Woodland Intimates,' 316;
Walter's * Wild Birds in City Parks,' 316; Snow's CaUlogue of
Kansas Birds, 317; Proceedings of the Nebraska Ornithologists'
Union, 317 ; Fisher on the Birds of Keam Canyon, Arizona, 318 ;
Stone on a Collection of Birds from Sumatra, 318; McGregor on
Birds from Norton Sound, 319; McGregor on Philippine Birds,
319; Bangs on New Subspecies of American Birds, 320; Bangs's
Revised List of Birds of the Liu Kiu Islands, 320 ; Barrett-Hamil-
ton on the Position of the Legs of Birds in Flight, 321 ; I)ubois*s
* Synopsis Avium,* 321; North's Nests and Eggs of Australian
Birds. 321; Madarizs's Birds of Hungary, 322; Seth-Smith's
Handbook of Parrakeets, 322 ; Shufeldt on the Osteology of the
Steganopodes, 323; Shufeldt on the Classification of Certain
Groups of Birds, 323 ; Publications Received, 324.
NOTES AND NEWS.
Obituary: Thomas Edwards Slevin, 326, George H. Ready, 327;
Mrs. E. S. Mogridgc, 327. New Natural History Journals, 327 ;
Meetings of Ornithological Societies, 328; Birds in the New
York Zoological Park, 329 ; Moa's Eggs, 330.
Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Chkck-List of North
American Birds 331
NUMBER IV.
Pa«.f
Further Notes on the Philadelphia Vireo. with Descrip-
tion OK THE Nest and Kiiiis. By William Brc.vster. (Plate
* « I*/ • • • • • • • • • • \^ 3
Andudoniana. By 5. A''. Rkoads 37S
Contenis of Volume XX, vii
Notes on the Birds Peculiar to Laysan Island, Hawaiian
Group. B7 WalUr K. Fisher. (Plates XII-XVI.) . 38^
The Black-winged Palm Tanager. By Austin H. Clark. 398
Notes on the Anatomy op Geospiza^ Cocornis and Certhidia,
B7 Robert E. Snodgrass. (Plates XVII-XX.) ... 402
A Contribution to the Life History op the Herring Gull
{Larus argentatus) IN the United States. Bj William
Butcher and William Baily. Plates XXI and XXII.) . 417
A New Subspecies op Nighthawk from the Bahama Islands.
By J. H. Riley. 431
GENERAL NOTES.
Sabine's Gull at Monterey, California, 433 ; The Snowy Plover in the
Bahamas, 433; Richardson^s Owl {Nyctala tengmalmi richard-
soni) in Illinois, 433 ; Capture of the Barn Owl (Strix pratincola)
on Long Island, New York, 434 ; The Second Known Specimen
of Centurus nyeanus Ridgway, 434 ; Nighthawk Migration in New
Hampshire, 434 ; Nests and Eggs of Cceligena clemencice 435 ;
Mortality of Purple Martins (Progne purpurea) at Brattleboro,
Vt., 435; Sand Swallows (Riparia riparia) Nesting in Sawdust,
436 ; An interesting Solitary Vireo ( Vireo solitarius), 437 ; BelFs
Vireo {Vireo bellii) in Colorado, 438; Nest and Eggs of the
Swainson^s Warbler {Helinaia swainsonii)^ 438; Springfield,
Mass., Bird Notes, 439; Some New Records for Nova Scotia,
439 \ Formalin Fails as an Insecticide for Dermestes, 440.
RECENT LITERATURE.
Macoun's ^ Catalogue of Canadian Birds,' Part II, 441 ; Dresser's ^ A
Manual of Palaearctic Birds,' 441 ; Huntington's * Our Feathered
Game,' 443 j Degen on the "Perennial Moult" of the Australian
Piping Crow, 444 ; Weed's Bibliography of Economic Ornithol-
ogy, 446 ; Howe and Sturtcvant's Revised List of the Birds of
Rhode Island, 446 ; Stone on Birds of Southern New Mexico
and Western Texas, 447 ; Oberholser, on New Birds from Texas,
447; Bonhote's List of Birds collected in the Bahamas, 447 ; Sher-
born's * Index Animalium,' 448; * The Index Zoologicus,' 450;
Ornithological Magazines — * The Osprey,' 451 ; Chapman's ' The
Economic Value of Birds to the State,' 453; Publications
Received, 454.
CORRESPONDENCE.
The Use of Trinomials, 454.
NOTES AND NEWS.
The Twenty-first Congress of the American Ornithologists' Union,
457; Obituary: Prof. Wilbur Clinton Knight, 457; Dr. Gustav
F. R. von Radde, 458. Discovery of the Breeding Area of Kirt-
land's Warbler, 459 ; Annual meeting of the British Ornitholo-
gists' Union, 1903, 459 ; Parrots in the London Zoological
Society's Gardens, 460; *Our Animal Friends,' 460.
viii Contents of Volume A'-V.
Index 461
Errata 480
Contents of Volume XX. Hi
Officers, Committees, and Members of the American
Ornithologist's Union, 1902-1903. ix
LIST OF PLATES.
Plate I. Cardinal, Nesting in a Conservatory.
*' II. Crows, dead ftom an Epidemic of Roup.
*' III.i Map showing States which have adopted the A. O. U. Model
Law.
*' IV.* Map showing States which have Audubon Societies.
" V. Fig. I. Brown Pelican and Nest ; Fig. 2. A Corner of Pelican
Island.
" VI. Fig. I. Common Tern on Nest; Fig. 2. Young Common Tern,
hiding.
" VII. Preserving Equilibrium.
" VIII. View in Lake Vallej^, California, showing Transition, Cana-
dian, Hudsonian, and Alpine Zones.
'* IX. Wright's Lake, northwest of Pyramid Lake, California.
" X. Young Ducks (various species).
'* XI. Nest and Eggs of Philadelphia Vireo.
** XII. Laysan Finch and Nest.
" XIII. Fig. I. Laysan Finch eating Tern's Egg; Fig. 2. Laysan
Rail eating Tern's Egg.
" XIV. Acrocepkalms familiaris and Nest.
" XV. Laysan Rail and Nest.
" XVI. Nest and Young of Laysan Teal.
" XVII-XX. Anatomy of Geospixa^ Cocornis, and Certkidia,
" XXI. Fig. I. Rocky Shore, Great Duck Island, Maine; Fig. 2.
Herring Gulls, Great Duck Island, Maine.
*' XXII. Young Herring Gulls and pipped Eggs.
* Plate III should be numbered Plate IV and Plate III should be num-
bered Plate III, to correspond with the references to them in the text.
OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES OF THE AMERICAN
ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1902-1903.
Expiration of Term.
Mbrriam, C. Hart, President November, 1903.
Cory, Charles B., \
Batchelder, C. p., / y'ce^Presi\ients - 1903.
Sage, John H., Secretary ** 1903.
DuTCHER, William, Treasurer ** 1903.
Additional Members of the Council.
Chapman, Frank M November, 1903.
Deane, Ruthven " 1903.
Dwight, Jonathan, Jr., " I903»
Fisher, A. K " 1903.
Nelson, E. W " 1903.
Roberts, Thomas S " 1903.
Stone, Witmer " 1903.
Allen, J. A
Brewster, William vt:« « .j ^
„ ^ ^ > Ex-Presidents.
Elliot, D. G
RiDGWAY, Robert
Editorial Staff of 'The Auk.'
Allen J. A., Editor November, 1903.
Chapman, Frank M., Associate Editor ** 1903.
Committees.
Committee on Publications,
Merriam, C. Hart, Chairman, Allen, J. A.
Sage, John H., Secretary, Chapman, Frank M.
Dutcher, William.
Committee 0/ Arrangements for the Meeting" of 1903.
Merriam, C Hart, Chairman, Baily, W. L.
Sage, John H., Secretary. Pennock, C J.
Stone, Witmer.
Fellows,
FELLOWS S MEMBERS, AND ASSOCIATES OF THE
AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION.
OCTOBER, 1902.
FELLOWS.
rOmiaaion of date indicates a Foander.]
Date of
Election.
Aldrich, Hon. Charles, Des Moines, Iowa —
Allen, Dr. J. A., Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City —
Anthony, A. W., 7614 Savier St., Portland, Ore 1895
Bangs, Outram, 240 Beacon St., Boston, Mass 1901
Barrows, Prof. W. B., Agricultural College, Mich 1883
Batcheldbr, Charles Foster, Cambridge, Mass —
Beal, F. E. L., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C 1901
Belding, Lyman, Stockton, Cala 1SS3
BiCKNELL, Eugene P., 32 Nassau St., New York City —
Bishop, Dr. Louis B., 356 Orange St., New Haven, Conn 1901
•Brewster, William, Cambridge, Mass —
Brown, Nathan Clifford, Care of Messrs. Brown, Shipley & Co.,
123 Pall Mall, S- W., London, England —
Chadbourne, Dr. Arthur P., 225 Marlborough St., Boston, Mas8. . i$$9
Chapman, Frank M., Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City 1SS8
Cooke, Prof. Wells W., 1328 12th St., N. W., Washington, D. C 1884
•Cory, Charles B., i6o Boylston St., Boston, Mass —
Deank, Rlthven, 504 No. State St., Chicago, 111 18S3
DuTCHER, William, 525 Manhattan Ave., New York City 18S6
Dwight, Dr. Jonathan, Jr., 2 East 34th St., New York City 1S86
Elliot. Daniel G., F'ield Columbian Museum, Chicago, 111 —
Faxon, Dr. Waltkr, Mus. Comp. Zool., Cambridge, Mass 1896
Fisher, Dr. Albert K., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. . —
Gill, Prof. Theodore N., Smithsonian Inst., Washington, D. C 1883
Grinnell, Dr. George Bird, Audubon Park, New York City 1883
Grinnell, Joseph, 572 No. Marengo Ave., Pasadena, Cal 1901
Henshaw, IIe.nry W., Hilo, Hawaiian Islands 1883
' Fellows and Members of the Union, and Subscribers to 'The Auk ' are
requested to promptly notify William Di'TCHER, Treasurer, 525 Manhattan
Ave., New York City, of any change of address.
• Life Fellow.
Honorary Fellows. xi
Lawrence, Newbold T., 51 Liberty St., New York City 1883
LooMis, Leverett M., California Acad. Sci., San Francisco, Cala. . 1892
Lucas, Frederic A., U. S. Nat. Mus., Washington, D. C 1892
Mearns, Dr. Edgar A., U. S. A., War Dept., Washington —
Merriam, Dr. C. Hart, Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. .. —
Nehrling, H., Palm Cottage, Gotha, Fla 1883
Nelson, E. W., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C 1883
Oberholser, Harry C, Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C . . 1902
Palmer, Dr. T. S., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C 1901
Palmer, William, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C 1898
Purdie, Henry a., ioi Mt. Vernon St., Boston, Mass —
Richmond, Dr. Charles W., Smithsonian Inst., Washington, D. C. . 1897
Ridgway, Prof. Robert, Smithsonian Inst., Washington, D. C —
Roberts, Dr. Thomas S., 1603 4th Ave., So. Minneapolis, Minn 1883
•Sage. John H., Portland, Conn 1883
Saunders, William E., 352 Clarence St., London, Ontario 1883
Shufeldt, Dr. Robert W., 471 W. 145th St., New York City —
Stejneger, Dr. Leonhard, Smithsonian Inst., Washing^ton, D. C. 1884
Stone, Witmer, Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia, Pa 1892
•Trumbull, Gurdon, 970 Asylum Ave., Hartford, Conn 1888
WiDMANN, Otto, 5105 Morgan St., St. Louis, Mo 1884
HONORARY FELLOWS.
Berlepsch, Count Hans von, Schloss Berlepsch, per post, Gerten-
bach, Cassel, Germany 1890
Blanford, Dr. William T., 72 Bedford Gardens, Kensington,
London, W 1895
Bocage, Prof. J. V. Barboza du, Royal Museum, Lisbon 1883
Cabanis, Prof. Dr. Jean, Friedrichagen, near Berlin 18S3
Dresser, Henry Eeles, 28 Quensborough Terrace, London, W..1S83
FiNscH, Dr. Otto, Zo5logical Museum, Leyden, Holland 1883
Giglioh, Dr. Henry Hillyer, Director Royal Zoological Museum,
Florence 1 883
Hartert, Ernst, Zoological Museum, Tring, England 1902
Harvey-Brown, John A., Dunipace House, Larbert, Stirlingshire,
Scotland 1902
Hume, Allan Octavian, The Chalet, Kingswood Road, Upper Nor-
wood, London, S. E 1883
Meyer, Dr. A. B., Director of the Royal Z06I. Museum, Dresden 1900
Newton, Prof. Alfred, Magdalene College, Cambridge, Eng 18S3
* Life Fellow.
xii Corresponding bellow s.
Reichenow, Dr. Anton, Kdnigi. Mus. fttr Naturkunde, Invaliden
Str., 43, Berlin 1891
Salvadori, Prof. Count Tommaso, Royal Zoological Museum, Turin,
Italy 1883
Saunders, Howard, 7 Radnor Place, Hyde Park, London, W 1884
ScLATER, Dr. Philip Lutley, 3 Hanover Sq., London, W 1883
Sharpe, Dr. Richard Bowdler, British Museum (Natural History),
Cromwell Road, London, S. W 1883
Wallace, Prof. Alfred Russbl, Corfe View, Parkstone, Dorset,
England 1883
CORRESPONDING FELLOWS.
Alfaro, Anastasio, San Jos^, Costa Rica x888
Blasius, Dr. Rudolph, Brunswick, Germany 1884
Blasius, Dr. Wilhblm, Brunswick, Germany 1884
Bryant, Walter E., Santa Rosa, Calif 1900
BuLLER, Sir Walter Lawry, Wellington, New Zealand 1883
Bureau, Dr. Louis, Ecole de Medicine, Nantes, France 1884
Butler, Lieut.-Col. E. A., Plumton House, Bury St. Edmunds,
Suffolk, England 1884
BuTTiKOFER, J., Zoological Gardens, Rotterdam, Holland 1886
Campbell, Archibald James, Melbourne, Australia 1902
Chamberlain, Montague, Cambridge, Mass 1901
Clarke, Wm. Eagle, Science and Art Museum, Edinburgh 1889
CoLLETT, Prof. Robert, Zoological Museum, Christiania, Norway. . 18S3
Dalgleish, John J., Brankston Grange, Bogside Station, Stirling,
Scotland 1883
Dole, Sanford B., Honolulu, Hawaiian Isl 1888
Dubois, Dr. Alphonsb, Museum Nat. History, Brussels 1884
DuGks, Prof. Alfredo, Colegio del Estado, Guanajuato, Mexico 1884
Echt, Adolph Bachofen von, Nussdorf, near Vienna 1883
Evans, Arthur H., 9 Harvey Road, Cambridge, Eng 1899
Fatio, Dr. Victor, Geneva, Switzerland 1884
Feilden, Lieut.-Col. H. W., West House, Wells, Norfolk, Eng 1884
Ferrari-Perez, Prof. Fernando, Naturalist Mexican Geol. Expl.
Commission, Pueblo, Mexico 1885
Freke, Percy Evans, 7 Limes Road, Folkstone, Kent, England 1883
FDrbringer, Prof. Max, Director Anatom. Institute, University of
Heidelberg, Germany 1891
Gadow, Dr. Hans, Zodlogical Museum, Cambridge, England 1884
Girtanner, Dr. A., St. Galle, Switzerland 1884
Godman, F. Du Cane, 10 Chandos Street, Cavendish Sq., London. . 1883
Godwin-Austen, Lieut.-Col. H. H., Shalford House, Guilford, Eng-
land 1884
Grandidier, Alfred, 6 Rond-Point des Champs Elys^es, Paris 1883
« Members, xiii
Grant, William R.'Ogilvie, 29 Elvaston Place, London, S. W.. .. 1899
GuRNEY, John Henry, Keswick Hall, Norwich, England 1883
Harting, James Edmund, Linnxan Society, Burlington House, Pic-
cadilly, London 1883
Hayek, Dr. Gustav von, Vienna 1884
Henson, Harry V., Yokohama 1888
Hudson, William Henry, Tower House, St. Luke's Road, West-
bourne Park, London, W 1895
Ihring, Dr. Hermann von, Museu Paulista, Sao Paulo, Brazil 1902
Knudson, Valdemar, Kauai, Hawaiian Ids 1888
Krukenberg, Dr. E. F. W., WUrzburg, Germany 1884
Kruper, Dr. Theobald J., University Museum, Athens, Greece 1884
Legge, William V., Cullenswood House, St. Mary's, Tasmania 1891
Leverkuhn, Dr. Paul, The Palace, Sophia, Bulgaria 1890
MacFarlane, Robert, Winnipeg, Manitoba 1886
MadarAsz, Dr. Julius von, National Museum, Budapest, Hungary. . 1884
Msnzbier, Dr. M., Imperial Society of Naturalists, Moscow 1884
Namiye, M., Tokio 1886
Nicholson, Francis, 84 Major St., Manchester, England 1884
North, Alfred J., Australian Museum, Sydney, New South
Wales 1902
Oates, Eugene William, i Carlton Gardens, Ealing, London, W. . 1884
Oddi, Dr. E. Arrigoni degli. University of Padua, Italy 1900
Oustalet, Dr. Emile, Jardin des Plantes, 55 Rue de Buffon, Paris.. 1888
Palm&n, Dr. J. A., Helsingfors, Finland 1S83
PhiL'IPPI, Dr. R. A., Santiago, Chili 1884
Radde, Dr. Gustav Ferdinand, Tiflis, Russia 1S84
Ramsey, E. P., Sydney, New South Wales 1884
Ringer, Frederic, Nagasaki, Japan 1888
Rothschild, Hon. L. Walter, Zoological Museum, Tring, Eng-
land 1898
Schalow, Herman, 15 Schleswiger Ufer, Berlin, N. W 1884
Shelley, Capt. G. E., 39 Edgerton Gardens, South Kensington,
London, S. W., England 1884
Theel, Dr. Hjalmar, University of Upsala, Upsala, Sweden 1884
Tristram, Rev. Canon H. B., The College, Durham, England 1884
Tschusi zu Schmidhoffen, Victor Ritter von, Hallein, (Villa
Tannenhof), Salzburg, Austria 1884
Waterhouse, F. H., 3 Hanover Square, London, W 1889
Zeledon, Don Jos^ C-, San Jos^, Costa Rica 1S84
MEMBERS.
Allen, Francis H., 4 Park St., Boston, Mass 1901
Allison, Andrew, Lobdell, La 1902
xiT Members.
Attwater, H. p., Houston, Texas .' 1901
Bauley, Mrs. Vbrnon, 1834 Kalorama Ave., Washington, D. C 1901
Bailey, Vkrnon, 1834 Kalorama Ave., Washington, D. C 190 1
Baily, William L., 421 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, Pa 1901
Bartsch, Paul, Smithsonian Inst., Washington, D. C 1902
Bknt, Arthur C, Taunton, Mass 1902
Beyer, Prof. George E., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, La 1901
Bond, Frank, 141 2 15th St, N. W., Washington, D. C 1901
Braislin, Dr. William C, 217 St. James Place, Brooklyn, N. Y 1902
Brown, Herbert, Yuma. Arizona 1901
Bruner, Prof. Lawrence, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb 1901
Bryan, William Alanson, Bishop Mdseum, Honolulu, H. 1 1901
Burns, Frank L., Berwvn, Pa 1901
Butler, Amos W., 52 Downey Ave., Irvington, Indianapolis, Ind*.i90i
Cherrie, George K., 27 Fairview Place, Brooklyn, N. Y 1901
Clark, Prof. Hubert Lyman, Olivet College, Olivet, Mich 1902
Daggett, Frank S., 255 Ramona St., Pasadena, Cala 1901
Deane, Walter, 29 Brewster St., Cambridge, Mass 1901
Everman, Prof. Barton W., U. S. Fish Comm., Washington, D. C . . 1901
Fannin, John, Provincial Museum, Victoria, B. C 1901
Fisher, Walter Kenrick, Palo Alto, Cala 1901
Fleming, James H., 267 Rusholme Road, Toronto, Canada 1901
FuERTEs. Louis Agassiz, 13 East Ave., Ithaca, N. Y 1901
Goldman, Edward Alfonso, Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. 1902
Hardy, Manly, Brewer, Maine 1901
Hoffmann, Ralph, Belmont, Mass 1901
Howell, Arthur H., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C 1902
Jeffries, Wm. Augustus, P. O. Box 2013, Boston, Mass 1901
Job, Rev. Herbert K., Kent, Conn 190 1
Jones, Lynds, College Museum, Oberlin, Ohio 1901
Jordan, Prof. David Starr, Stanford University, Cala 1901
JUDD, Dr. Sylvester D., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C*«>i9oi
Knowlton, F. H., U. S. Nat. Museum, Washington, I). C 1902
Mackay, George II., 114 State St., Boston, Mass 1901
Mailliard, John W., 307 Sansome St., San F'rancisco, Cala 1901
Maili.iard, Joseph, San Geronimo, Cala 1901
McGregor, Richard C, Philippine Museum, Manila, P.I 1901
Miller, Mrs. Olive Tiiorxe, 827 De Kalb Ave., Brookljn, N. Y 1901
Murdoch. John, 38 Whiting St., Roxbury, Mass 1901
Norton, Arthur H., Westbrook, Maine 1902
Osgood, Wh-FRKd Hudson, Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. 1901
Pearson, T. Gii.iikrt, Greensboro, N. C 1902
Pennock, Chaklks J., Kennctt Square, Pa 1901
Preble, Edward A., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C 1901
Price, William W., Aha, Cala 1901
Ralph, Dr. William L., U. S. Nat. Museum, Washington, D. C*-*i90i
Associates. xv
Rathbun, Samuel F., 217 14th Ave., No. Seattle, Wash 1902
Rhoads, Samuel N., Audubon, N. J 1901
Rives, Dr. William C, 1723 I St., Washington, D. C 1901
Robinson, Capt. Wirt, U. S. A., Wingina, Va 1901
Seton, Ernest Thompson, 80 W. 40th St., New York City 1901
Silloway, Perley Milton, Lewistown, Montana 1902
SoRNBORGBR, Jewell D., Cambridge, Mass 1901
Stephens, Frank, cor. University and Fillmore Aves., San Diego,
Cala 1901
Thayer, Abbott H., Monadnock, N. H 1901
Todd, W. E. Clyde, Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pa 1901
ToRREY, Bradford, Wellesley Hills, Mass 1901
TowNSEND, Charles H., N. Y. Aquarium, Battery Park, New York
City igoi
Trotter, Dr. Spencer, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa 1901
Whitman, Prof. Charles Otis, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, 111 1902
Wright, Mrs. Mabel Osgood, Fairfield, Conn 1901
ASSOCIATES.
Abbott, Clinton Gilbert, 153 W. 73rd St., New York City 1898
Adam, Mrs. William L., Pittsfield, Mass 1900
Adams, Emily B., 167 Maple St., Springfield, Mass 1900
Adams, C. Wallace, 947 Rhode Island Ave. N. W., Washington, D. C . 1901
Adams, Mrs. Emma S., 439 Elm St., Chicago, Ills 1899
Aiken, Charles Edward Howard, Colorado Springs, Colo 1898
Allen, Clarence Jones, 180 Biddle St., Milwaukee, Wis 1899
Allen, Glover M., 68 Perkins Hall, Cambridge, Mass 1896
Allen, Walter Fox, 62 Prospect St., Trenton, N. J 1902
Ames, J. H., 96 Bay St., Toronto, Can 1895
Axgell, Walter A., 354 Westminster St., Providence, R. 1 1901
Armstrong, Edward Henry, 140 Wood St., Providence, R. 1 1897
Arnold, Edward, 126 Van Buren St., Battle Creek, Mich 1S94
Atkinson, Dr. Daniel Armstrong, 24 17 Carson St., Pittsburgh, Pa. 1899
Babson, W. a., Upper House, Lawrenceville, N. J 190 1
Bachman, J. W., D. D., Chattanooga, Tenn 1901
Bacon, Carrington C, Imboden, Arkansas 1890
Bagg, Egbert, 424 Genesee St., Utica, N. Y 1S83
Bailey, Charles E., Manning Manse, No. Billerica, Mass 1S90
Baird, Miss Lucy Hunter, 1708 Locust St., Philadelphia, Pa 1899
Baird, Robert L., Denmark. Iowa igoi
Baker Arthur Benoni, 1845 Lanier Ave., N. W. Washington, D. C. . 1902
Baker, Miss Christine Virginia, 8 West 57th St., New York City. 1899
Baker, Miss Emilie H., 8 West 57th St., New York City 1899
Baker, Mrs. Henry B., 8 West 57th St., New York City 1901
xvi Associates,
Ball, Carlbton R., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C
Ball, Miss Hblen Augusta, 43 Laurel St., Worcester, Mass
Bangs, Edward Applbton, 501 Pemberton Bldg., Boston, Mass
Barber, Charlbs M., 407 No. Oregon St., El Paso, Texas
Barbour, Prof. Erwin H., Univ. of Neb., Lincoln, Nebraska
Barbour, Rev. Robert, 62 Walnut St., Montclair, N. |
Barbour, Mrs. Wm. D., 235 Madison Ave., New York City
Barnard, Job, 1306 Rhode Island Ave., Washington, D. C
Barnes, Hon. R. Magoon, Lacon, 111
Barroll, Miss Nina Livingston, 684 Salem Ave., Elizabeth, N. J. .
Bates, Mrs. Abby Frances Caldwell, Waterville, Maine
Baxter, George Strong, JrM 17 William St., New York City
Beard, Daniel Carter, 204 Amity St., Flushing, N. Y
Beck, Rollo Howard, Berryessa, Santa Clara Co., Cala
Bbbbe, Charles William, N. Y. Zoological Park, 183rd St. and
Southern Boulevard, New York City
Beers, Henry W., 91 Denver Ave., Bridgeport, Conn
Bennetts. Wm. J., 154 U. St. N. W., Washington, D. C
Benson, Frederick G., 845 Broad St., Newark, N. J
Bergtold, Dr. W. H., 1460 Clayton Ave., Denver, Colo
Berier, De Lagnbl, Port Chester, N. Y
BiDDLE, Miss Emily Williams, 2201 Sansom St., Philadelphia, Pa.
BiGEi.ow, Edward F., Stamford, Conn
Bigblow, Henry Bryant, Cohasset, Mass
BiGELow, Homer Lane, 511 Washington St., Boston, Mass
BiGKLow, Joseph Smith, Jr., Cohasset, Mass
BiGNELL, Mrs. Effie, 135 College Ave , New Brunswick, N. J
Blackwelder, Eliot, Unir. of Chicago, Chicago, 111
Blain, Alex. W., Jr.,' 131 Elmwood Ave., Detroit, Mich
Blake. Francis G., 10 Park St., Brookline, Mass
Blatchley, W. S., State Geologist, Indianapolis, Ind
Bloomfield, Mrs. .C C, 723 Main St. W., Jackson, Mich
Blunt, Miss Eliza Sinclair, 99 Mt. Vernon St., Boston, Mass....
B0HL.MAN, Herman T., 46 Ninth St., N., Portland, Oregon
Bond, Harry L., Lakefield, Minn
BowDisH, B. S.. 50 W. 98th St, New York City
BowDiTcii, Harold, Jamaica Plain, Boston, Mass
Bowles, John Hooper, 401 So. G St, Tacoma, Wash
Bracken, Mrs. Henry Martyn, ioio Fourth St., S. E., Minne-
apolis, Minn
Bradford, Mrs. Mary F., 3804 St. Charles Ave., New Orleans, La. .
Bradford, Moses B. L., 295 Beacon St., Boston, Mass
Bradleb, Tho.mas Stevenson, 107 Beacon St., Boston, Mass
Brandreth, Franklin, Ossining-on-Hudson, N. Y
Brbnnan, Charles F., Mount Carmcl, 111 '.
Brbninger, George Frank, 560 N. 6th Ave., Phoenix, Arizona. . • .
902
893
884
900
892
902
901
886
889
899
894
894
887
894
897
895
901
902
889
885
898
901
897
902
896
899
895
901
901
895
901
901
901
890
891
900
891
897
897
889
902
S89
902
898
Associates. xvii
Brewster, Edward Everett, Iron Mountain, Mich
Bridge, Mrs. Lidian E., 52 Wyman St., West Medford, Mass
Brock, Henry Herbert, M. D., 687 Congress St., Portland, Me. . .
Brockway, Arthur William, Ljme, Conn
Brooks, Allan, Comox, B. C
Brooks, Rev. Earle Amos, Waverly, W. Va
Brooks, Clarence Morrison, 105 West St., Keene, N. H
Brown, Edward J., Lemon City, Florida
Bro^^t^, Hubert H., 70 Collier St., Toronto, Ontario
Brown, Stbwardson, Germantown, Philadelphia, Pa
Brown, Wilmot W., Jr., West Somerville, Mass
Buck, Henry Robinson, P. O. Box 213, Hartford, Conn
BuLLBY, Reginald H., Canton, Ohio
Bumpus, Dr. Hermon C, Am. Mus. Natural History, New York City.
Burgess, John Kingsbury, Dedham, Mass
Burke, Wm. Bardwbll, 130 Spring St., Rochester, N. Y
Burnett, William L., 128 N. Sherwood St., Fort Collins, Colo
Burtis, Henry Mott, Babylon, N. Y
Buswell, Walter Mardin, Charlestown, N. H
Buxbaum, Mrs. Clara E., St. Joseph, Mich
Campbell, Horatio Nelson, Jr., Providence, R. I
CanfiblD, J. B., Bridgeport, Conn
Carpenter, Rev. Charles Knapp, Polo, 111
Carroll, James J., Waco, Texas
Cary, Merritt, Neligh, Neb
Case, Clifford M., 89 William St., Hartford, Conn
Cash, Harry A., 54 Spring St., Pawtucket, R. I
Chamberlain, Chauncy W., 36 Lincoln St., Boston, Mass
Chapin, Prof. Angie Clara, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Mass. . .
Chase, Mrs. Agnes, 5515 Monroe Ave., Hyde Park, Chicago, 111. . .
Childs, John Lewis, Floral Park, N. Y
Christy, Bayard H., 403 Frederick Ave., Sewickley, Pa
Chubb, Samuel H., Am. Mus. Nat. History, New York City
Clark, Austin Hobart, 68 Perkins Hall, Cambridge, Mass
Clark, Edward B., 341 Oak St., Chicago, 111
Clark, Josiah H., 238 Broadway, Paterson, N. J
Clarke, Charles K., M. D., Rockwood Hospital, Kingston, Ont. . .
Clarke, Miss Harriet E., 9 Chestnut St., Worcester, Mass
Coale, Henry K., Highland Park, 111
Coggins, Herbert Leonard, 5025 McKean Ave., Germantown,
Philadelphia, Pa
CoLBURN, Albert E., Bond Building, Washington, D. C
Cole, Roy Nall, Newnan, Ga
CoLviN, Walter S., Osawatomie, Kansas
Comeau, Napoleon A., Godbout, P. Qj
CoMEY, Arthur C, 54 Concord Ave., Cambridge, Mass
893
902
894
898
902
892
900
891
889
895
892
897
889
901
898
901
895
897
897
895
899
901
894
898
898
892
898
885
896
896
900
901
894
899
900
895
902
896
883
898
891
902
896
885
901
xviii Associates,
Commons, Mrs. Marie A., 2437 Park Ave., Minneapolis, Minn 1902
CoNANT, Mrs. Martha W., 331 W. loist St., New York City 190X
CoNGDON, James W., 202 S. 9th St., La Crosse, Wis '. 1902
Cook, Miss Lilian Gillette, 165 W. 82d St., New York City.... 1899
CooLiDGE, Philip Tripp, 17 Garfield St., Watertown, Mass 1902
Cope, Alban, Butler Hospital, Providence, R. 1 1885
Cope, FkANCis R., Jr., E. Washington Lane, Germantown, Phila., Pa* 1892
Copeland, Dr. Ernest, 141 Wisconsin St., Milwaukee, Wis 1897
CoPELAND, Manton, Taunton, Mass 1900
CouEs, Dr. William Pearcb, 90 Charles St., Boston, Mass 1888
Cox, Ulysses O., State Normal School, Mankato, Minn 1894
Cram, R. J., 26 Hancock Ave., W., Detroit, Mich 1893
Crandall, C. W., Woodside, N. Y 1891
Crolius, Miss Anne A., 815 Carnegie Hall, New York City 1897
Crone, John Valentine, 13 19 8th Ave., Greeley, Colo 1902
CURRiE, John D., 2006 Laurel Ave., Minneapolis, Minn 1902
CuRRiE, RoLLA P., U. S. Nat. Mus., Washington, D. C 1895
Currier, Edmonds Samuel, 909 Franklin St., Keokuk, Iowa 1894
Daniel, John W., Jr., 1794 Lanier Ave., Washington, D. C 1895
Dart, Leslie O., 1603 4th Ave., So. Minneapolis, Minn 1898
Davenport, Mrs. Elizabeth Braxton, Brattleboro, Vt 1898
Davis, Miss Mary A., 44 W. 93rd St., New York City 1898
Davis, Stewart, Narragansett Pier, R.I 1899
Davis, Walter R., Newton, Mass 1900
Davison, Donald B., 204 Prospect Park, Davenport, Iowa 1901
Dawson, Rev. William Leon, Station A, Columbus, 0 1895
Day, Chester Sessions, 280 Newbury St., Boston, Mass 1897
Day, Frank Miles, Phil. Ellena & Greene Sts., Germantown, Phila.
Pa 1901
Dean, R. H., U. S. Weather Bureau, Lexington, Ky 1893
Deane, George Clement, 80 Sparks St., Cambridge, Mass 1899
Dearborn, Ned, Field Columbian Museum, Chicago, 111 1902
Db Haven, Isaac Norris, Ardmore, Pa 1893
Derby, Richard, 13 Holworthy Hall, Cambridge, Mass 1898
t>EWEY, Dr. Charles A., 53 So. Fitzhugh St., Rochester, N. Y.... 1900
Dewey, Miss Margaret, 168 Pearl St., Springfield, Mass 1892
Dille, Frederick M., Care of Rural Delivery, Longmont, Colo. . .1892
DiONNB, C. E., Laval Univ., Quebec, Can 1893
DixoN, Frederick J., Elm Ave., Hackensack, N. J 1891
Dobbin, William L., 7 Beverly St., Rochester, N. Y 1902
Dodge, Charles W., Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, N. Y 1900
Dodge, Fred Clinton, 125 Milk St., Boston, Mass 1897
Doubleday, Mrs. Frank Nelson, hi E. i6th St, New York City. .1897
Dougherty, Col. William E., Governor's Island, N. Y 1890
Draper, Miss Dorothea, 18 W. 8th St., New York City 1899
Drowns, Frederick Pbabody, 20 Benefit St., Providence, R. 1 1899'
Associates', xix
Dug MORS, Arthur Radclyffe, Newfoundland, N. J
Dull, Mrs. A. P. L., 2 1 1 No. Front St., Harrisburg, Pa
DuRFEE, Owen, Fall River, Mass
DuTCHER, Dr. Basil Hicks, U. S. A., War Dept., Washington, D. C.
Dyche, Prof. L. L., Lawrence, Kansas
Dyke, Arthur Curtis, Bridgewater, Mass
Eastman, Harry D., Framingham, Mass *
Eaton, Elon Howard, 209 Cutler Bldg., Rochester, N. Y
Eddy, Newell A., 615 North Grant St., Bay City, Mich
Edgar, Newbold, 28 E. 39th St., New York City
Edson, John M., 2210 Victor St., Whatcom, Washington
EicHE, August, 1 133 O St., Lincoln, Neb
EiFRiG, Rev. GusTAVE, 232 N. Center St., Cumberland, Md
Elrod, Prof. M. J., 205 S. 5th St., Missoula, Montana
Ely, Mrs. Theodore N., Bryn Mawr, Pa
Embody, George Charles, 78 Seymour St., Auburn, N. Y
Emerson, Guy, 78 Powell St., Brookline, Mass
Emery, Mrs. Annie C, Ellsworth, Me
Emlen, Arthur Cope, Awbury, Germantown, Philadelphia, Pa
Emory, Mrs. Mary Dille, Morgantown, W. Va
Ericson, Lawrence, 155 Rogers Ave., Brooklyn, N. Y
Evans, Charles H., Townshend, Vt
Evans, Ernest Merw yn, Awbury, Germantown, Philadelphia, Pa - .
Evans, William B., Moorestown, N. J ^
Everett, William M., 200 W. 99th St., New York City
Everett, Christ abel M., 200 W. 99th St., New York City
Farr, Marcus S., 12 Maple §t., Princeton, N. J
Farwell, Mrs. Ellen Drummond, Lake Forest, 111
Farwell, Mrs. Francis Cooley, Lake Forest, 111
Faulks, Emory N. , Madison, N. J
Fay, Prof. Chas. R., 1833 7th Ave., New York City
Felger, Alva Howard, 2628 Clay St., Denver, Col
Fernald, Robert Heywood, Washington Univ., St. Louis, Mo..*-
Ferry, John Farwell, Lake Forest, 111
Field, Edward Bronson, 981 Asylum Ave., Hartford, Conn
Field, Eugene Dwinell, 200 Beacon St., Hartford, Conn
Field, Theron R., Care of Nat'l Bk., Denver, Colo
Fisher, Miss Elizabeth Wilson, 1502 Pine St, Philadelphia, Pa...
Fisher, William H., i 320 Bolton St., Baltimore, Md
Fisher, William Hubbell, Wiggins Block, Cincinnati, Ohio
Flanagan, John H., 392 Benefit St., Providence, R. I
Fletcher, Mrs. Mary E., Ludlow, Vermont
Flint, Harry W., Yale National Bank, New Haven, Conn
FooTE, Miss F. HuBERTA, 90 Locust Hill Ave., Yonkers, New York
City
FoRBUSH, Edward H., Wareham, Mass
899
900
887
886
886
902
891
89s
88s
891
886
902
901
892
901
898
902
897
896
899
901
901
897
897
902
902
goo
896
898
902
901
898
890
894.
898
899
900
896
89s
883
898
898
888
897
887
XX Associates.
FoRDYCE, Geo. L., 40 Lincoln Ave., Youngstown, Ohio
Foster, Francis Apthorp, 15 Oxford St., Cambridge, Mass
Fowler, Frederick Hall, Palo Alto, Calif
Fowler, Henry W., Acad. Nat. Sci., Logan Square, Philadelphia, Pa.
Fox, Dr. William H., 1826 Jefferson Place, Washington, D. C • .
Fraser, Donald, Johnstown, N. Y
Fuller, Charles Anthony, Sumner Road, Brookline, Mass
Gath, John, Torrington, Conn
Gault, Benjamin True, Glen EUvn, 111
Gaut, James H., Dcpt. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C
Germann, F. W., 214 S. Geneva St., Ithaca, N. Y
Gesner, Rev. Anthon T., Shattuck School, Faribault, Minn
GiLLET, Louis Bliss, 247 E. 86th St., New York City
Gilman, Philip Kingsworth, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Balti-
more, Md
Gleason, Rev. Herbert W., 31 Pinckney St., Boston, Mass
GoDDARD, F. N., 2 E. 35th St., New York City
GooDALE, Dr. Joseph Lincoln, 397 Beacon St., Boston, Mass
Goss, Mrs. Aletta W., 5475 Ridgewood Court, Chicago, 111
Gould, Henry, 648 Dundas St., London, Ontario
Gould, Joseph E., 1020 loth St., Chattanooga, Tenn
Granger, Walter W., Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City
Gray, Ralph W., 79 Marlborough St., Boston, Mass
Green, Morris M., 706 E. Fayette St., Syracuse, N. Y
Greenough, Henry V., Martha's Vinevard, Mass
Gripping, Moses Bowditch, Shelter Island Heights, N. Y
Griffiths, Bartram W., 4024 Green St., Philadelphia, Pa
Grimes, Martin V. B., East Templeton, Mass
Hales, Henry, Ridgewood, N.J
Hall, Miss Minna B., Brookline, Mass
H AMFELDT, A., Morris, 111
Ha.mlin, GEOR(iE L., 16 Division St., Danbury, Conn
Hankinso-v, Thomas Leroy, Charleston, III
Harriman, Miss Cornelia, i E. 55th St., New York City
Harri.man, Miss Mary, i E. ^^th St., New York Citv
Hartley, Geo Innkss, 159 Grove St., Montclair, N. J
Harvey, Herbert A., 86 Boylston St., Bradford, Pa
Harvey, Miss Ruth Sawyer, Bond Hill, Ohio
Hastings, Daniel G., M. D., 272 Alexander St., Rochester, N. Y. . .
Hathaway, Henry S., Box 49S, Providence, R. I
Havemeyer, 1 1 . O., Jr., Mahwah, N.J
Hay, William Perry, Howard Univ., Washington, D. C
Hazard, Hon. R. G., Peace Dale, R. I
Hkcox, Miss Laura J. F., Light House Keeper, Santa Cruz, Cala...
Hedges, Charles F*., Miles City, Mont
Hbgner, Robert W., 9333 Prospect Ave.. Chicago, III
901
893
892
898
883
902
894
901
902
899
901
899
895
897
894
901
885
902
899
8S9
891
896
886
901
897
603
902
890
900
892
893
897
899
899
901
899
902
902
897
893
898
885
897
891
901
Associates. "^ xxi
• • •
Heimstreet, Dr. T. B., 2217 15th St., Troy, N. Y
Helms, Arthur H., Millers Place, Suffolk Co., N. Y
Hendrickson, Isaac S., Floral Park, N. Y
Hendricksox, W. F., 130 I2th St., Long Island City, N. Y
Henninger, Rev. Walther F., Tiffin, Ohio
HiGBEE, Harry G., Hyde Park, Mass . .*
HiGGiNsoN, Alexander Henry, So. Lincoln, Mass
Hill, James Haynes, Box 485, New London, Conn . . .
HiNDSHAW, Henry Havelock, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,
Md
HiNE, Prof. James Stewart, State Univ., Columbus, O
HiNE, Mrs. Jane L., Sedan, Ind
HiNTON, Miss Susan McV., 41 W. 32d St., New York City
Hitchcock, Frank H., Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C
Hodge, Prof. Clifton Fremont, Clark Univ., Worcester, Mass
HoLDEN, Edward Freeman, 32 Lake Ave., Melrose, Mass
HoLDEN, Mrs. Emeline T., 13 E. 79th St., New York City
Holland, Dr. William J., 5th and Bellefield Aves., Pittsburgh, Pa. .
HoLLisTER, Ned, Delavan, Wis
HoLLisTER, Warren D., Care of Cont. Oil Co., Albuquerque, N. M.
Holmes, La Rue Klingle, Pine Grove Ave., Summit, N. J
HooPEs, JosiAH, West Chester, Pa
Hornaday, W. T., N. Y. Zoological Park, New York City
HoRTON, Mrs. Frances B., Brattleboro, Vt
Howard, Ozora William, Los Angeles, Cala
Howe, Carlton D., Essex Junction , Vt
Howe, Reginald Heber, Jr., Longwood, Brookline, Mass
Hubbard, George W., 94 Byers St., Springfield, Mass
Hubbard, Miss Margaret Tuesdale, Minneapolis, Minn
Hubbard, Mrs. Sara A., 177 Woodruff Ave., Flatbush, N. Y
Hughes, Dr. William E., 3945 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, Pa
Hull, Walter B., Box 1234, Milwaukee, Wis
HuNN, John T. Sharpless, 1218 Prospect Ave., Plain field, N.J
Hunt, Chreswell J., 1306 N. 53rd St., West Philadelphia, Pa
Hunter, Miss Susan Morrison, 51 Hunter Ave., Newport, R. I
Hunter, W. D., Box 174, Victoria, Texas
Hyde, Miss Hazel R., 45 Pine St., Waterbury, Conn
Ingalls, Charles E., East Templeton, Mass
Ingersoll, Albert M., 818 5th St., San Diego, Cala
Irving, John, 550 Park Av., New York City
Irwin, Hardin, Havre, Montana
Isham, C. B., 30 E. 63d St., New York City
Jackson, Thomas H,, 343 E. Biddle St., West Chester, Pa
Jacobs, J. Warren, Waynesburg, Pa
Janney, Nathaniel E., 112 Drexel Bldg., Philadelphia, Pa
Jenkins, Hubert Oliver, Stanford University, Cala
888
888
902
885
898
900
899
897
897
899
S90
900
891
899
896
902
899
894
901
902
889
888
900
8q8
901
895
900
899
891
891
889
895
902
894
S99
902
885
885
894
901
891
888
889
899
902
xxii Associates.
Jesurun, Dr. Mortimer, Douglas, Wyoming
Johnson, Everett Edwin, East Hebron, Me
Johnson, Frank Edgar, 747 Warburton Ave., Yonkers, N. Y
Johnson, James Howard, Bradford, N. H
Johnson, Walter Adams, 34 Union Sq., New York City
Johnson, William S., Boonville, N. Y • . . .
Jordan, A. H. B., Lowell, Wash
JuDD, Elmer T., Cando, No. Dakota
Keays, James Edward, 41 Oxford St. W., London, Ont
Keim, Thomas Daniel, 405 Radcli^ St., Bristol, Pa
Kelker, William A., Box 1 14, Harrisburg, Pa
Kellogg, Prof. Vernon L., Stanford University, Cala
Kendall, Dr. William C, U. S. Fish Comm., Washington, D. C. .
Kennard, Frederic Hedge, Brookline, Mass
Kevser, Leander S., D. D., 108 Third Ave., Canal Dover, Ohio
King, George Gordon, 16 E. 84th St., New York City
King, Le Roy, 20 E. 84th St., New York City
KiRKWooD, Frank C, 1811 Maryland Ave., Baltimore, Md
Knetsch, Robert, Nunda, 111
Knight, Ora Willis, 84 Forest Ave., Bangor, Me
Knolhoff, Ferdinand William, 28 Winans St., East Orange, N.J.
Knox, John C., 14 State St., Auburn, N. Y
Knox, John Cowing, Jackson, Minn
KoBB^ William H., 125 High St., New Haven, Conn
Koch, Prof. August, Williamsport, Pa
KoEBLE, H. J., 845 Broad St., Newark, N. J
KoiiN, Gust AVE, 136 Carondelet St., New Orleans, La
Kopman, Henry Hazlitt, 5509 Hurst St., New Orleans, La
Koumly, Rev. Pirmine M., St. Benedict's College, Atchison, Kans*.
Lacry, Howard George, Kerrville, Texas
Lano, Albert, Aitkin, Minn .*
Lantz, Prof. David Ernest, Agl. Exper. Station, Manhattan, Kans.
Larabee, Austin P., Gardiner, Mc
Latimer, Miss Caroline P., 63 Rcmsen St., Brooklyn, N. Y
Laurent, Philip, 31 E. Mt. Airy Ave., Philadelphia, Pa
Lee, Miss Mary, 241 W. Seymour St., Gcrmantown, Pa
Leutlokf, Herman C. A., 626 E. 135th St., New York City
Levering, Thomas Hf.nry, Richmond St., Washington, D. C
Leverson, Dr. Montague R., 81 Lafayette Ave., Brooklyn, N. Y
Libby, Orin Grant, I'niversity, N. Dakota
Lloyd, Andrew Ja.mes, 310 Boylston St., Boston, Mass
Long, Horace B., 14 Anna St., Worcester, Mass
Loo.Mis, John A., Mcreta, Texas
Lord, Rev. Wm. R., 9 Park St., Boston, Mass
LoRiNG, J. Aldkn, Owego, New York
Lx>ucKs, William E., 319 S. Washington St., Peoria, 111
• • •
890
896
888
894
898
893
888
895
899
902
896
888
886
892
891
888
901
892
898
893
897
897
899
898
891
902
886
899
892 •
899
890
885
902
898
902
898
896
898
901
900
900
S89
887
901
S89
902
Associatts. xxiii
Lows, WiLLOUGHBY P., OkehamptoD, Devon, England
LuDLAM, Christopher, Ocean City, Md
MacDougall, George R., 131 W. 73rd St., New York City
Maher, J. E., Windsor Locks, Conn
Martin, Mrs. Maria Ross, New Brunswick, N. J
Maddock, Miss Emeline, 2025 DeLancey PI., Philadelphia, Pa
Maitland, Robert L., 35 Nassau St., New York City
Marsh, Daniel J., Springfield, Mass
Masterman, Elmer Ellsworth, New London, Ohio
Mathews, Miss Caroline, Waterville, Me
ALiYNARD, Henry W., Biol. Survey, Washington, D. C
McClintock, Norman, Amberson Ave., Pittsburgh, Pa
McCooK, Philip James, 32 E. 45th St., New York City.
McCoRMicK, Miss Eliza, ioi No. Front St., Harrisburg, Pa
McEwen, Daniel C, 160 Stirling PL, Brooklyn, N. Y
McHatton, Dr. Henry, Macon, Ga
McIlhenny, Edward Avery, Avery's Island, La
McKechnib, Frederick Bridgham, Ponkapog, Mass
McLain, Robert Baird, cor. Market & 12th Sts., Wheeling, W. Va. .
McMillan, Mrs. Edith £., New London, Conn
McNuLTY, Henry A., Gen. Theol. Seminary, Chelsea Sq., N. Y. City.
Mbarns, Louis di Zbrega, Fort Snelling, Minn
Meeker, Jesse C. A., 746 E. Main St., Bridgeport, Conn
Merrill, Harry, Bangor, Maine •
Miller, Frank M., 203 Hennen Bldg., New Orleans, La
Miller, Gbrrit Smith, Jr., U. S. Nat. Mus., Washington, D. C. . . .
Miller, Miss Mary Mann, 827 De Kalb Ave., Brooklyn, N. Y
Miller, Waldron De Witt, Plainfield, N. J
Mills, Harry C., Unionville, Conn
Mills, Prof. William C, State Univ., Columbus, O
Mitchell, Mrs. Mina Baker, Care of Plow Co., Chattanooga, Tenn.
Mitchell, Walton I., 534 Summit Ave., St. Paul, Minn
Minehan, D., 459 Main St., Buffalo, N. Y
Montgomery, Thomas H., Jr., Univ. Pennsylvania, Phila., Pa
Moon, Joachim Richard, 934 Broadway, Camden, N. J
Moore, Miss E. Putnam, 70 W. nth St., New York City
Moore, Robert Thomas, Haddonfield, N. J
Moore, William Henry, Scotch Lake, New Brunswick
Morcom, G. Frean, 512 Coronado St., Los Angeles, Cala
Morris, George Spencer, Olney, Philadelphia, Pa
Morris, Robert O., Springfield, Mass
Morse, George W., Ashley, Ind
Morton, Dr. Howard McIlvain, 316 Clifton Av., Minneapolis, Minn .
Mummery, Edward G., 24 E. Atwater St., Detroit, Mich
Myers, Miss Lucy F., "Brookside," Poughkeepsie, N. Y
Nash, Herman W., Pueblo, Colorado
893
900
890
902
902
897
889
894
895
898
901
900
895
900
901
898
894
900
893
902
900
899
899
883
901
886
898
896
897
900
898
893
901
899
898
901
898
900
886
887
888
898
900
902
898
892
xxiv Associates.
m
Nelson, James Allen, Biol. Hall, Univ. of Pa., W. Philadelphia, Pa.
Newman, Stephen M., D. D., i8i8 M. St., N. W., Washington, D. C.
Nicholas, Ross, Portland, Oregon
Nichols, John Treadwell, 42 W. nth St., New York Citj
Nichols, John M., Portland, Me
Nicholson, Richard R., 1397 King St., Toronto, Ont
NiMS, Lee, Kelso, Wash
NoRRis, J. Parker, 723 Walnut St., Philadelphia, Pa
Norton, Arthur Henry Whiteley, San Antonio, Texas
NowELL, John Rowland, Union College, Schenectady, N. Y
O'Connor, Haldeman, 25 No. ?>ont St., Harrisburg, Pa
Ogden, Dr. Henry Vining, 141 Wisconsin St., Milwaukee, Wis..-.
Olcott, Theodore F. , New Dorp, N. Y
Oldys, Henry, Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C
Oliver, Daniel Leet, Shields, Pa
Oliver, Henry Kemble, 2 Newbury St., Boston, Mass
0*Neil, Edward, Sewicklcy, Allegheny Co., Pa
OsBURN, Raymond Carroll, Columbia Univ., Dep't. Zool., New
York City
Osbcrn, Rev. William, Belmont Ave., Station K, Cincinnati, O
Osgood, Henry W., Pittsfield, N. H
Owen, Miss Juliette Amelia, 306 No. 9th St., St. Joseph, Mo. ......
Page, Mrs. Alice Wilson, Englewood, N.J
Paine, Aigistls G., Jr., 311 W. 74th St., New York City
Palmer, Samuel Copeland, Swarthmorc, Pa
Pardee, Dr. Lucius Crocker, Highland Park, 111
Parker, Wendell Phillips, 2vS Freeland St., Worcester, Mass
P.VTTEN, Mrs. Jeanie Mawry, 2212 R St. N. W., Washington, D. C-
Paul.mier, Frederick Clark, State Museum, Albany, N. Y
Peadody, Willia.m Rod.man, 13 Kirkland St., Cambridge, Mass
Perry, Elton, D. D. S., 1032 Main St., Bridgeport, Conn
Peterson, Prof. J. P., West Denmark, Polk Co., Wis
Phelps, Mrs. Ann.v Bardwell, Box 36, Northfield, Mass
Phillips, Alexander H., Princeton, N. J
Pierce, A. K., Renovo, Pa
Plimpton, Prof, (teorge L., Tilton, N. H
PoE, Miss Marcjaretta, 1500 Park Ave., Baltimore, Md
PoMEROY, Harry Kirkland, Kalamazoo, Mich
Poole, Alfred D., Wilmington, Delaware
Pope, T. Edmund B., 20 Hawthorne St., Providence, R. I..
Porter, Loi'is H.. Stamford, Conn
Praeger, William E., Keokuk, Iowa
Proctor, Mi.ss Mary A., Franklin F'alls, N. H
PuRDUM, Dr. C. C, Pawtucket, R. I
Purdy, James B., Plymouth, Mich
Rann, Mrs. Mary L., Manchester, Iowa
• •
89S
89S
901
901
890
900
902
886
894
897
896
897
901
896
902
900
893
899
Sgo
901
897
896
SS6
S99
902
897
900
902
S90
902
S85
S99
891
891
900
899
894
901
901
89.^
892
900
901
893
893
Associates,
XXV
Rawson, Calvin Luther, Box 33, Norwich, Conn
Read, Albert M., 1322 12th St. N. W., Washington, D. C
Reach, Dr. Arthur Lincoln, 39 Maple St., West Roxbury, Mass • . .
Redfield, Miss Elisa Whitney, 107 No. 34th St., Philadelphia, Pa.
Redington, Alfred Poett, Santa Barbara, Cala
Reed, J. Harris, Aldan, Pa
Reed, Hugh Daniel, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N. Y
Rehn, James A. G.* Acad, of Nat. Sciences, Philadelphia, Pa
Rhoads, Charles J., Bryn Mawr, Pa
Richards, Miss Harriet E., 36 Longwood Ave., Brookline, Mass . . .
Richards, John Bion, Fall River, Mass
Richardson, John Kendall, Wellesley Hills, Mass
RiCKER, Everett Wilder, P. O. Box 5083, Boston, Mass
RiDGWAY, John L., Chevy Chase, Md
RiKER, Clarence B., Maplewood, N. J
Riley, Joseph H. , Falls Church, Va
Ritchie, Sanford, Dover, Me
Robbins, Reginald C, 373 Washington St., Boston, Mass
Robins, Mrs. Julia Stockton, 114 S. 21st St., Philadelphia, Pa
Roberts, William Ely, Swarthmore Col., Swarthmore, Pa
Robertson, Howard, Station A, Los Angeles, Cala
Roddy, Prof. H.Justin, State Normal School, Millersville, Pa
Roosevelt, Franklin Delano, Hyde Park, N. Y
Roosevelt, Theodore, Jr., White House, Washington, D. C
Rotzell, Dr. W. E., Narberth, Pa
Rowland, Mrs. Alice Story, Public Library, Plainfield, N. J
Rowley, John, Jr., Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City
Sage, Henry M., care of H. S. Sage & Co., Albany, N. Y
SxVMPSON, Walter Behrnard, 36 S. California St., Stockton, Cala.
Samuel, John Hughes, 58 Church St., Toronto, Can
Sand, Isabella Low, Ardsley-on-Hudson, N. Y
Sands, Austin Ledyard, Greenough PI., Newport, R. I
Sanford, Leonard C, M. D., 216 Crown St., New Haven, Conn. . .
Sargent, Harry Cleveland, Chocorua, N. H
Savage, James, 134 Abbott St., Buffalo, N. Y
Savage, Walter Giles, Jasper City, Mo
ScHMiTT, Dr. Joseph, Laval Univ., Quebec, Canada
ScHOENEBECK, AuGUST JoHN, Kelley Brook, Wis
Schrafft, Nelson, Union Ave., Irvington, N. J
Schurr, Prof. Theodore A., 164 Linden St., Pittsfield, Mass
Schwab, Rev. Lawrence H., 549 W. 156th St., New York City
Seale, Alvin, Bishop Mus., Honolulu, H.I
Seiss, Covington Few, 1338 Spring Garden St., Philadelphia, Pa. . .
Severson, Henry P., Winneconne, Wis
Shattuck, Edwin Harold, Granby, Conn
Shattuck, George Cheever, 135 Marlboro St., Boston, Mass
885
895
896
897
890
890
900
901
895
900
888
896
894
890
885
897
900
901
895
902
901
891
896
902
893
897
8S9
885
897
902
902
902
902
900
895
89S
901
898
901
888
892
900
898
902
898
896
xxvi Associates,
Shaw, Holton A., 610 8th Ave., Grand Forks, No. Dakota
Shaw, Louis Agassiz, Chestnut Hill, Mass
Shepard, Marshall, 134 W. 73d St., New York City
Sherrill, W. E., Haskell, Texas
Shields, George O., 23 W. 24th St., New York City
Shoemaker, Frank H., Omaha Nat'l Bk. Bldg., Omaha, Neb
Shrosbrre, George, Public Museum, Milwaukee, Wis
Shrvock, William A., 21 N. 7th St., Philadelphia, Pa
SiLLiMAN, Harper, 562 5th Ave., New York City
Smith, Charles Piper, 2 106 Central Ave., Indianapolis, Ind
Smith, Horace G., 2918 Lafayette St., Denver, Colo
Smith, Dr. Hugh M., 1209 M St. N. W., Washington, D. C
Smith, Louis Irvin, Jr., 3908 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, Pa
S.MITH, Mrs. J. Edwin. 423 James St., Syracuse, N. Y
Smith, Robert Windsor, Kirkwood, Ga
Smith, Theodore H., 22 Essex Ave., Orange, N. J
Smyth, Prof. Ellison A., Jr., Polytechnic Inst., Blacksburg, Va
Snodgrass, Robert Evans, Stanford Univ., Cala
Snyder, Will Edwin, Beaver Dam, Wis
SouTHWicK, James M., Mus. Nat. Hist, Providence, R. I
Spaid, Prof. Arthur R., 1819 Delaware Ave., Wilmington, Del
Spaulding, Fred B., Lancaster, N. H
Spinney, Herbert L., Seguin Light Station, Popham Beach, Mc. . .
Stack, Frederick Willia.m, 824 Park Ave., Plainfield, N. J
Stanton, Prof. J. Y., Bates College, Lewiston, Me
Stephenson, Mrs. Louise McGown, Helena, Ark
Stone, Dwight D., Lansing, N. Y
Strong, Dr. Reuben M., Univ. Chicago, Chicago, 111
Sturtevant, Edward, St. George School, Newport, R. I
SuRBER, Sherrard McClure, Santa Rosa, N. M
Surface, Harvey Adam, Dept. of Agr., Harrisburg, Pa
Swain, John Merton, Augusta, Me
Swales, Bradshaw Hall, 135 Warren Ave., E., Detroit, Mich
Swarth, Harry S., 512 Coronado St., Los Angeles, Cala
Sweet, Dana W., Route 2, Phillips, Me
SwEZEY, George, 66 Jackson St., Newark, N.J
Talley, Prof. Thomas Washington, Tuskegee, Ala
Tavernier, Percy A., 6207 Greenwood Ave., Chicago, III
Taylor, Alexander O'Driscoll, 132 Bellevue Ave., Newport, R. I.
Test, Dr. Frederick Cleveland, 4401 Indiana Ave., Chicago, III..
Thayer, John Eliot, Lancaster, Mass
Tiio.MAs, Miss Emily Hinds, "Hindsbury," Bryn Mawr, Pa
Thompson, Miss Caroline B., Clapier St., Gcrmantown, Philadelphia,
Pa
ToppAN, George L., 18 E. 23d St., New York City
TowNSEND, Dr. CiiAs. Wendell, 76 Marlborough St., Boston, Mass.
898
901
899
896
897
895
899
893
902
898
888
886
901
901
89s
896
893
902
89s
896
901
894
900
900
883
894
891
889
896
902
897
899
902
900
902
901
896
902
888
892
898
901
900
886
901
Associates, xxvii
TowNSEND, WiLMOT, 3d Ave. and 75th St., Bay Ridge, N. Y
Treat, VVillard E., Silver Lane, Conn
Trotter, William Henry, Jr., 36 No. Front St., Philadelphia, Pa..
TuTTLE, Dr. Carl, Berlin Heights, Ohio
Tweedy, Edgar, 336 Main St., Danbury, Conn
Underwood, William Lyman, Mass. Inst. Technology, Boston, Mass.
Vail, Herbert K., Glen Cove, N. Y
Van Cortlandt, Miss Anne S-, Croton-on-Hudson, N. Y
Van Denburgh, Dr. John, 1626 Turk St., San Francisco, Cala
Van Name, Willard Gibbs, 121 High St., New Haven, Conn
Van Norden, Warner Montagnie, Rye, New York
Van Sant, Miss Elizabeth, 717 N. Y. Life Bldg., Omaha, Neb....
Varick, Mrs. John B., 283 Orange St., Manchester, N. H
Vetter. Charles, D. D. S., 152 Second St., New York City
Wales, Edward H., Hyde Park, N. Y
Walker, Dr. R. L., 355 Main St., Carnegie, Pa
Walter, Herbert E., 435 Belden Ave., Chicago, 111
Walters, Frank, 7 W. 103d St.. New York City
Warren, Dr. B. H., Box 245, Westchester, Pa
Warren, Edward Royal, 20 W. Caramillo St., Colorado Springs,
Colo
Watson, Miss Sarah R., Clapier St., Gcrmantown, Phil., Pa
Watters, Robinson Cator, 9 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, Md ....
Webster, Mrs. Mary P., 1025 5th St., S. E., Minneapolis, Minn ....
Weir. J. Alden, ii E. 12th St., New York City
Wells, Frank S., 916 Grant Ave., Plainfield, N. J
Wentworth, Irving H., Matehuala E. de S. L. P., Mexico
West, James A., Savoy, 111
West, Lewis H., Rosly n, Nassau Co., N. Y
Westfeldt, Gustaf R., P. O. Box 601, New Orleans, La
Wetherill, Wm. H., 126 So. 30th St., Philadelphia, Pa
Wetmore, Mrs. Helen H., 343 Lexington Ave., New York City..-.
Wheeler, Edmund Jacob, 95 Jefferson Ave., New London, Conn . . .
Wheeler, John B., East Templeton, Mass
Wheelock, Mrs. Irene G., 1040 Hinman Ave., Evanston, 111
Whitcomb, Mrs. Annabell C, 72 k Franklin St., Milwaukee, Wis. • •
White, Francis Beach, 6 Phillips Place, Cambridge, Mass
White, W. A., 158 Columbia Heights, Brooklyn, N. Y
W1CKERSHA.M, Cornelius W., 5 Linden St., Cambridge, Mass.
Wicks, M. L., Jr., Hellman Block, Los Angeles, Cala
Wilbur, Addison P., 4 Gibson St., Canandaigua, N. Y
Wilcox, T. Ferdinand, i 15 W. 75th St., New York City
Wilde, Mark L. C, 315 N. 5th St., Camden, N. J
Willard, Jno. Melville, 2221 Elm St., Oakland, Cal
Williams, J. Bickerton, 15 Wellington St. E., Toronto, Can
Williams, Richard Ferdinand, P. O. Box 521, New York City . . .
894
885
899
890
902
900
902
885
893
900
899
896
900
898
896
888
901
902
885
902
900
900
900
899
902
900
896
887
902
901
902
898
897
902
897
891
902
902
890
895
895
893
902
S89
902
xxviii Deceased Members.
Williams, Robert Statham, Botanical Gardens, New York City.. 1888
Williams, Robert White, Jr., Tallahassee, Fla 1900
Williams, W. J. B., Holland Patent, N. Y 1893
Williamson, E. B., Bluffton, Ind 1900
Wilson, James Franklin, Basin, Montana 1901
Wilson, Sidney S., 1021 Sylvania St., St. Joseph, Mo 1895
Winkenwerder, Hugo August, High School, Sheybogan, Wis 1900
WoLcoTT, Dr. Robert H., Univ. of Neb., Lincoln, Nebraska 1901
Wolfe, William Edward, Wray, Colo 1900
Wood, Dr. Howard L., Groton, Conn 1901
Wood, J. Claire, 179 17th St., Detroit, Mich 1902
Wood, Nelson R., Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C 1895
Woodcock, Arthur Roy, Corvallis, Oregon 1901
Woodruff, Edward Seymour, 14 E. 68th St., New York Citv 1S99
Woodruff, Lewis B., 14 E. 68th St., New York City 1886
Woodward, Dr. Lemuel F., 52 Pearl St., Worcester, Mass 1901
WooDWoRTH, Mrs. Nelly Hart, 41 Bank St., St. Albans, Vt 1894
Worcester, Prof. Dean C, U. S. Philippine Comm., Manila, 1?. I.. 1895
Worthen, Charles K., Warsaw, 111 1891
Worthington, Willis W., Shelter Island Heights, Suffolk Co., N. Y.1889
Wright, Frank S., 51 Genesee St., Auburn, N. Y 1894
Wright, Horace Winslow, Jefferson Highlands, N. H 1902
Wright, Mrs. Jane Atherton, 2 Main St., Greenfield, Mass 1902
Wri(;ht, Miss Nora Giralda, 387 Plainfield St., Olncyville, R. I . . . . 1896
Wright, SAM,Conshohocken, Pa 1895
Yorkk, Dr. F. Henry, Foosland, 111 1S91
DECEASED MEMBERS
Fellows.
Datt 0/ Death
Bairi), Si'knckr Fullkrton Aug. 19, 1887
Bkndirk. Charles E Feb. 4, 1897
Coues, Elliott Dec. 25, 1899
Goss, N. S March 10, 1891
Holder, Joseph B Feb. 28, 1888
Jeffries, John Amory March 26, 1892
McIlwraith, Thomas Jan. 31, 1903
Merrill, Jamks C Oct. 27, 1902
Sennett, George Burritt March 18, 1900
Wheaton, John M Jan. 28, 1887
Dtceastd Mtmhtr$.
HoNORARv Fellows.
BURMBISTBR, Herman'n Mav I, 189J
GXtke, llfiNRicii Jan. i, 1897
GuNDLACH JfAK March :4, 1896
Gi-KNEv JtiMN Henry April ao, 1890
Hartlaub, Gcstav Nov. 10, 1900
Huxley Thouas H Jwie ig, 189J
Kral's FnttDiijAND Sept. 15, 1890
La-wrbncb, George N Jon. 17, 189s
Milne-Ed WARDS, Alphonse April 11, 1900
P.\RKER, William Kitchen- ■■.' J'i'y 3i 1890
Pelzbln, August von Sept. j, 1891
Salvin Osbert June i, 1898
Scrlbcel, IIeruann Jan. 17, 1884
Skebohm, Menrv Nov. 16, 1895
Taczaxowski. Ladislas Jan. 17, 1890
CoRRBSPON'OtN'G FELLOWS.
Altum, C. a Jan. i, 1900
Andbrsok, Johk Aug. 16, 1900
Baldamus, Edvard Oct. 30, 1893
Blakiston, Thomas W Ocl. 15, 1891
BocDANow, Modest N March 4, 1S88
Cooper, James O July 19. 1901
Bordeaux. JOHN A^. i. 1899
David, Armand Nov. 10, 1900
Haast, Julius von Aug. 15, 1887
Hargitt, Edward March 19,1895
HoLUB, Emu Feb. Ji, 190J
HoMEV^h, E F. vox Movjr, 1889
Layard, Eug.^r Leopold Jon. 1, 1900
Lyttlkton, Thomas, Lord Lilford June 17, 1896
Marsckall, a. F Oct. II, 1887
Malmgren, Anders Johan April ij, 1897
M EbESDoRFF Alexander Th BO DOR von Jan. 28, 1894
Mo<i)isuvics, F. G. Hermakn August Aug. 17, 1897
Prbjkvalbki, N. M Oct. JO, 1887
pRESTiss, I>. "Webster Nov. ig, 1899
Pryer, Harry Jaues Stovin-- Feb. 17, 1888
SviikEnck Leopold von Jon. 10, 1894
SElevs-Longschamps, Edmond de Dec. 11, 1900
m Dtetat4d Mtmbtr).
Sbvbrtzow. N Feb. 8
Stevksson, H bnry Aug. I f
Wharton, Henry T Sept. —
Mkmbbrs.
Adams, Charles F May ao, 1893
Allen, Charles Slovbr Oct. 15, 1893
Atkjns, II X M«y 19, 1885
Avery, William Citsiiman March u, 1894
Baklow, Chester Nov, 6, 190J
Baur, George June 15, tSqS
BscKiiAM. Charles Wiceliffe June 8, tSSS
Bill, Cjiarlek Aprli — , 1897
Birtwell, Francis JosBfii June 19, 1901
BoARDMAN. Gborcb A Jan. ti, 1901
BoLLfcs, Frank Jan. 10, 1894
Brackett Foster H Jan. j, 1900
Breesb,Willlam L Dec. 7. 18S9
BROEjt w. L. W Sept. 3, 1897
Brown, Ji>iin Clifford Jan. 16, 1901
Browne, Francis Charles Jan. 9, 1900
Cawnb, John S June 10. 1895
Call, Aubrev Brendon Nov. 10, 1901
Campbell, Robert Argyll April — , 1897
Carter, Edwin 1900
Clark, John N Jan. 14, 1903
CoLBiRN, \V. W Oct. 17,1899
Collet-*, Alokso M Aug. ii, 190J
Corning, Erasti's, Jr ApHI 9, 1893
CoE, W."W April 16, 1885
Daffik, Wm. H April 31, 1901
Dakin, John A Feb. 11, 1900
Dbxter, Newto.n Julj 17, 1901
Elliott. S. Lowell Feb. 11, 1889
Fairbanks, Franklin April 14, 1895
Fowler, J. L Julj- n. 1899
Gbkner, a. II April 30, 1895
GonB, Benjamin F Julv 6, 1S93
Hatch, Jesse MAfkitE May 1, 1898
HoADLEV, Frederic II Feb. 16, 189.1
HowLANU, Juiiv SxowDoN Sept. 19, 1S85
Incer!wll, JdSRPii Carlkton OlL 1, 1898
JBNKS.J011N W. P Sept. 17, 1894
JofY, Pierre Luvis March J J, 1894
Deceased Members, xxxi
Knight, Wilbur Clinton July 8,
KUMLIEN, LUDWIG DcC. 4
KUMLIEN, ThURE. . . . > Aug. 5
Lawrence, Robert Hoe April 27
Linden, Charles Feb. 3
Mabbett, Gideon Aug. 15
Marble, Charles C • Sept. 25
Marcy, Olfv'er March 19
Maris, Willard Lorraine Dec. 1 1
McKiNLAY, James Nov. i
Mead, George S • June 19
MiNOT, Henry Davis Nov. 13
MoRRELL, Clarence Henry fuly 15
Nichols, Howard Gardner June 23
Northrop, John I June 26
Park, Austin F Sept. 22
Ragsdale, George H March 25
Ready, George H March 20
Richardson, Jenness June 24
Selous, Percy Sherborn April 7
Slater, James H Feb. —
Slevin, Thomas Edwards Dec. 23
Small, Edgar A April 24
Smith, Clarence Albert May 6
Stowe, W. H March —
Thorne, Platte M March 16
Thurber, E. C Sept. 6
Vennor, Henry G June 8,
Waters, Edward Stanley Dec. 26
Willard, Samuel Wells May 24
W^ooD, William Aug. 9
Young, Curtis C July 30
^903
[902
[888
[897
[888
[900
[900
[899
^895
[899
[901
[890
[902
[896
891
^893
1895
^903
^893
[900
1895
[902
[884
896
^895
897
896
[884
[902
[887
885
1902
THE AUK:
A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF
ORNITHOLOGY.
VOL. XX. January, 1903. No. i
THE A. O. U. CHECK-LIST — ITS HISTORY AND ITS
FUTURE.^
BY J. A. ALLEN.
At the first Congress of the American Ornithologists' Union,
held in September, 1883, a committee was appointed on the * Clas-
sification and Nomenclature of North American Birds.' This
Committee was charged with the duty of preparing a Check-List of
the birds found in North America north of Mexico. It was a task
requiring much labor, and nearly three years passed before the
results of its work were made public, in the form of a volume of
400 pages, entitled *The Code of Nomenclature and Check-List of
North American Birds, adopted by the American Ornithologists'
Union, being the Report of the Committee of the Union on Classi-
fication and Nomenclature.' This work was published in 1886.
Seven supplements to the Check-List were issued during the
)ears 1889 to 1895. In 1895 a second edition of the Check-List,
without the * Code,' was issued, which embodied the changes and
additions made in the supplements, and considerable modification
of the matter relating to the geographical distribution of the
species and subspecies. Since that date four additional supple-
ments have been issued, the eleventh of the series having been
published in July of the present year.
^ Read at the Twentieth Congress of the American Ornithologists* Union,
Washington, D. C, Nov. 19, 1902.
Allkn, The A. O, U. Ckeck'List.
[r
The present Congress being the twentieth anniversary of the
appointment of the ' Committee on the Classification and Nomen-
clature of North American Birds,' this seems an opportune occa-
sion to review briefly the history of its work, noting statistically
the number of changes that have been made in the nomenclature
of the Check-List, and the number of additions made to it; and
also to attempt to forecast in the light of the past, its prospective
modifications.
First as to the past, which may be considered under the two
heads of (i) Additions, and (2) Changes in Nomenclature, noting
in each case their nature and number.
I. Additions.
Subfamilies
Genera
Subgenera
Species
Subspecies
3-
7.
3-
54-
181.
II. Changes of Nomrnclature.
Family names changed
Generic names changed
Subgenera raised to genera
Total changes in generic names
Subgeneric names changed
Specific names changed
Subs pect fie names changed .
Binomtaln changed totrinomialK '
I.
36.
18.
44-
2.
38.
»5-
The numerous additions to the Check-List denote the progress of
our knowledge of North American ornithology during the last
sixteen years, as regards the constituents of the ^North American
avifauna, the increase representing a total addition of 235 species
and subspecies and 7 genera. This is a net increase of 24.7 per-
cent, or nearly two percent a year.
' These relate mainly to forms found along our Mexican border which were
originally entered a.^ species, but have since been separated from the more
southern type form as subspecies. While this effects a change in nomencla-
ture, these changes neither add nor subtract any form from the Check-Iitt.
^"^'i^^ ] Allen. ri# A. O. U, Cktck-List. 3
The changes in nomenclature have been due to two causes : (i)
the discovery of some older available name than the one originally
adopted ; (2) that the name originally adopted was preoccupied
and therefore untenable. The number of changes in generic and
subgeneric names, including three corrections of orthography,
number less than 30 out of a total of 423, — 340 generic names
and ^i subgeneric names, — or about 7.3 percent.
The number of changes in specific and subspecific names is 63,
or less than six-tenths of one percent.
But these changes, while relatively so few, necessitate a large
number of modifications in the designations of species and sub-
species ; the change of a generic name, or the raising of a sub-
genus to a genus, affects all the species and subspecies of the
genus thus involved. Also the change of a single specific name
may entail a modification in the names of quite a number of sub-
species.
The changes in generic names affect the names of 90 species
and 25 subspecies, or a total of 115 names. These changes are
additional to the 63 changes in specific and subspecific names.
In other words about one in every ten of the specific and sub-
specific designations in the Check-List have been modified to
some extent.
As already said, the first edition of the Check-List was published
in 1886, and a second edition in 1895, since which date there have
been issued four supplements. The history of the Check-List thus
falls into two periods, the first of nine years, from 1886 to 1895,
and the second of seven years, from 1895 to 1902. It may be of
interest to compare statistically these two periods.
The first Check-List contained 768 species and 183 subspecies,
or a total of 95*1 named forms; the second contained 802 species
and 268 subsi>ecies, or a total of 1070; the net gain in nine years
having been 34 species and 85 subspecies.
In July, 1902, the Check-List and supplements contained 822
species and 364 subspecies, or a total of 1186 forms, the net gain
in seven years having been 20 species and 96 subspecies. There
was thus practically an equal increase in these two unequal periods,
with a rather greater ratio of increase in the subspecies as com-
pared with the species in the second period.
4 Allen, Tke A. O. U. Ck^ck-List. [^^
The total net gain for the whole seventeen years is, as tabulated
above, 54 species and 181 subspecies. Of the 54 species added,
it is noteworthy that 21, or nearly one-half, have come into the
list merely as stragglers and form no essential part of the fauna.
The number of such forms is now 93, or nearly eleven percent.
Excluding these waifs and strays, which reach us in about equal
numbers from the Old World and from tropical America, we have
as proper components of the fauna 730 species and 362 subspecies.
Other changes of some interest, but of only slight importance,
are the reduction of three species to subspecies, and the raising
of two subspecies to specific rank ; also the elimination of five
species and two subspecies. Four species have been added to
the Hypothetical List, and three removed from the Hypothetical
List to the Check -List proper.
In comparing the two periods into which we have divided the
history of the Check List, the second period of seven years shows
far more changes in names than marked the first period of nine
years. During the first period only 14 changes were made in
generic names as against 34 in the second, these changes affecting
only 14 species and three subspecies; while in the second period
76 species and 22 subspecies were thus affected. During the
first period the names of 16 species and 5 subspecies were
changed, in addition to the modifications due to the changes in
generic names, as against 22 and 20, respectively, for the second
period. Of the total of 178 changes that have been made in the
names of species and subspecies, only 38 were made in the first
period and 140 in the second. As the increase has been in a
constantly accelerated ratio, this does not seem to present an
encouraging outlook for the future.
What is the explanation of the accelerated increase, both in
I additions to the Check-List and in name changes .^ In a word,
the great increase in the number of workers during the last fiv^ or
six years. When the C^heck-List was compiled and published, and
for quite a number of years after, the number of prominent in-
vestigators who really had much hand in describing new forms or
were meddling to any great extent with questions of nomenclature,
could almost be numbered on the fingers of one hand. Five, or
at most seven, would include all properly to be included in this
N.
^^'i'w^ ] Allen, Tke A. O, U. Check-List. 5
category. Taking the same standard of activity as a basis, we
can now count at least three times this number, some of the most
active of whom had hardly appeared above the ornithological
horizon as late even as the publication of the second edition of
the Check-List. Some of the new contingent are especially
diligent in the search for new forms, others in bibliographical
research, and still others in both lines of activity. Field work has
been pushed with unprecedented energy, and along well planned
lines, resulting in the thorough exploration of much previously
little known territory, and the accumulation pf large series
of specimens from many before unrepresented localities. It is
this, in the main, healthy and praiseworthy activity that is slowly
revolutionizing our Check-List of North American birds. When
the first edition was issued, doubtless many consoled themselves
with the hope that we had at last reached a stable nomenclature,
and that our troubles with names and new forms were practically
over. Even the authors of the Check-List, it is safe to say, little
dreamed of the developments the short period of sixteen years
has brought forth.
What, it may be asked, is the outlook for the future? Are we
not nearly at the end of thqse changes and additions ? While the
future is a 'sealed book,' in North American ornithology as in
other affairs, * coming events cast their shadows before,* and it is
not difficult to forecast the general drift of ornithological events
for the next few years.
Doubtless a few more waifs and strays from foreign lands will
be added to the list of species, — a feature not very disturbing nor
very important, — but probably very few, if any, bona fide species
remain to be discovered within our Check-List limits. As field
work is carried on with more thoroughness into the still many
neglected areas, and it becomes possible to compare the birds of
such areas with proper material from other regions, there will
doubtless be some surprises through the discovery of local forms
which have thus far been overlooked. But the numerical increase
from this source will depend largely upon the fineness of our
ornithological net, and the trouble will be to keep out of the
Check-List forms undeserving of recognition.
There is hope of soon reaching the end of the overturning of
6 ^ Allen, Tk€ A. O. U. Check-List, [^^
familiar Qames, if the present activity in bibliographical research
continues at its present pace. That there will be an end is cer-
tain and the more intense the temporary inconvenience thus occa-
sioned the sooner will stability be attained.
There is one element of disturbance that is inuninent, and
should be early met, and which is unfortunately the result of a
little misguided conservatism, or lack of foresight, on the part of
the original Check-List Committee. This is the long list of sub-
genera which, to conform to the usages of the day in such matters,
should be raised to genera, and thereby entail a long list of changes
in the Check-List as regards the generic element in the names of
species and subspecies. Thirty-six such cases were listed at the
end of the Tenth Supplement, action on which has already been
twice deferred by the Committee, in view partly of the great
temporary inconvenience their adoption would incur, and partly
to make these changes at one time. Probably two thirds of these
subgenera are well entitled to recognition as genera and are so
recognized by a large part of ornithologists.
A few other changes in generic names are pending, and — if
we are to follow not only the A. O. U. Code, but also the hitherto
uniform ruling of the Committee — should be adopted. Over
these there is trouble brewing, due to a proposed new departure
in reference to such names. This is the new so-called * one letter
rule,' which has not as yet received the sanction of any body of
code makers but which will soon have to be officially faced by
the Union as well as by the A. (). U. Committee. It is not my
purpose to discuss the merits or demerits of the proposed new rule
in this connection, but simply to state that while to adopt it would
save three or four impending changes of generic names, its adop-
tion would also require the changing of a greater number of other
generic names which now form a part of the Check-List. Under
present rules, names which are etymologically the same, but which
vary slightly in construction, only that form of the word having
priority can be used in zoological nomenclature. The new rule
proposes that any number of variants of the same name are avail-
able, if they vary by only a single letter, even if the letter be
merely a connectent vowel, or depend on gender, as indicated by
the terminal syllable.
Voi. XX
190s
] Allbn, Tke A. O. U. C keek-List.
There has been so much discontent expressed over the constant
changes in the Check-List that it is perhaps proper to' consider
for a moment whether it is really worth while to try to have an
up to-date Check-List of North American birds. Only the older
members of the Union can remember why an attempt was ever
made to have an authoritative Check- List. It is perhaps a familiar
matter of history, however, to all, that at the time of the founding
of the American Ornithologists' Union there were two rival check-
lists, each by an eminent authority, which differed at many points.
Each of the authors of the two lists had a nearly equal following,
and there was consequent confusion and lack of uniformity in the
names currently in use for many of our birds. This was recognized
as a serious evil, likely to increase with the lapse of time. On the
founding of the Union it was conceived that if a Committee on
the nomenclature of North American birds were appointed by the
Union, to consist of five of the then leading authorities on the
subject, that this Committee could discuss and harmonize all points
of difference and formulate a check-list that should be a uniform
standard, and be endorsed as such by the Union. Most fortu-
nately this was the happy result of the very extended labors of
thb Committee, whose first work was to formulate and agree upon
a set of rules for its guidance in compiling the check-list. These
rules were published as the A. O. U. * Code of Nomenclature,'
and, though containing a number of radical departures from
previous similar codes, have received wide acceptance and have
had very great influence in shaping present nomenclatorial usage
in all departments of zoology, and even in botany.
The Code and Check-List were not expected nor intended to
set bounds to the progress of North American ornithology. It
was presumed that new light might show the necessity of chang-
ing a few names, and that new material might modify our concep-
tions of the status of a number of species and subspecies, and add
some new forms to the list. This has happened, and to a much
greater extent than was anticipated. Hence it became desirable
to continue the Committee, whose function it has since been to
revise all proposed changes in names and all proposed addi-
tions to the Check-List. The eleven supplements that have been
issued constitute the published record of its work.
8 At-len, The a, O. U. Check-List. LJ»«»-
The Committee has, of course, no absolute power ; it can only
suggest* or recommend, or give its opinion. But to the rank and
file of the A. O. U. its opinion has fortunately the force of law.
I^t us suppose, now, that after the publication of the first Check-
List, the Committee had been permanently discontinued and
things ornithological had been allowed to drift, and each one left
to form his own opinion as to the merits of new forms or proposed
emendations of nomenclature. Where would have been our
hoped-for uniformity of nomenclature ? While a Committee of five,
or seven, members selected from the more experienced and best
informed workers in technical ornithology may not be infallible in
its rulings, its combined opinion is certainly entitled to respect,
and may be considered as a rather important balance wheel in the
ornithological machine, and it is generally welcomed as affording a
tangible hitching-post for current opinion on matters where only
experts are competent to decide. Its function of arbitrator is not
always an agreeable duty, and is certainly undertaken with the
utmost conscientiousness. Its labors are not limited to the few
days or weeks spent in annual or semiannual sessions; its work is
apportioned in advance among subcommittees who often spend
weeks in careful investigation of the work assi<^ned them. Material
is assembled from all available sources, including the types of
the new forms involved, and also as much as possible of the
original material used by the describer of the forms. In many
cases the material required is not available, or at least not avail-
able ill sufficient quantity for a satisfactory decision, and the case
is then deferred for final action later.
We have seen how much the Check-List has been modified by
changes and additions. We may now consider how many pro-
posed changes and proposed additions the Committee has declined
to approve. First, as to proj^osed additions which have been dis-
approved. These number i »;enus, i i species, and 48 subspecies,
of which two-thirds have been proposed ^within the last six years.
Second, proposed changes in nomenclature and in the status of
species and subspecies disapproved. These include 13 names of
genera, 21 names of species, 10 names of subspecies and i'^ pro-
posed changes of status, or about half as many as have been
adopted. Besides this, the cases deferred and still pending in-
Vol. XX
1903
] Allen, Tk€ A. O. IT. Check Ust.
elude the names of 6 genera, 8 species, and 4 subspecies, and the
status of 8 species and 30 subspecies. In other words, only 52 per-
cen tqf the modifications proposed have been endorsed by the
Committee. If there had been no Committee to which these 500
or more questions could have been referred for a formal verdict it
is perhaps easier to imagine than to describe what would have
been the condition of the nomenclature of North American birds
in 1902. Of course some tender corns have been trodden on, and
the owners of some of them still prefer their own opinion to that
of the Committee, and possibly in some cases their action is
warranted. But doubtless all will admit that a few errors are
better than chaos. The chief departure from the Committee's
rulings relate to certain groups retained in the Check-List as
subgenera, contrary to the general consensus of opinion ; the ten-
dency to their recognition as genera doubtless only anticipates the
final action of the Committee, these questions being among its
deferred cases.
A word, in conclusion, in reference to the Miair-splitting '
tendencies of the day, of which complaint is more or less preva-
lent. The degree of difference necessary for fonnal recogjnition
in nomenclature is ever likely to be a bone of contention, its
decision being, in the nature of the case, more or less a matter of
temperament as well as of opinion. The danger of excessive
splitting is greater now than ever before, since we have reached
a point where comparatively few strongly marked local forms
remain to be discovered and named, while the number of enthu-
siastic young workers is steadily increasing. Plainly, not every
degree of differentiation that can be recognized by the trained
expert needs recognition by name, and not every slightly
differentiated form that can be distinguished readily on compari-
son of large series of specimens should be considered as entitled
to a place in a list of North American birds. The trinomial
system unfortunately lends itself readily to abuse, and can easily
be made to bring the whole system of naming subspecies into dis-
repute. Whether or not the differentiation is so readily dis-
tirrguishable as to warrant its recognition in nomenclature is a
question that may very fittingly be left to a Committee of experts,
whose combined opinion is more likely to be right than that of a
single authority, however cautions and experienced.
[Aak
BIRDS OF PORTO RICO.
BY B. S. BOWDISH.
( Concluded from Vol. XIX, Oct., 1902, p. 366. )
53. Tyrannus dominicensis. Gray Kingbird. — Ver^ abundant
wherever I went, and equally so at all seasons. It is perhaps the most
conspicuous bird of Porto Rico, being very evenly distributed about the
woods and fields, along the creeks, and about the houses in the towns.
In general habits it is much like the common Kingbird; it seems even
bolder in defence of its nest, while out of the breeding season it appears
rather less pugnacious, though not at all averse to indulging in many a
mock battle with its own kind in the tree-tops, uttering loud harsh cries.
Its nesting habits, and its eggs are scarcely distinguishable from those of
T. tyrannus. One pair, nesting about twenty rods from a ranch house
near Aguadilla, furnished a set of three eggs, slightly incubated, June 9,
1900. The nest was on a horizontal limb of a mango tree ten feet from
the ground, in an open field; diameter 7.00 X 2.25, depth 3.00 X 1.50
inches. It was composed of fine rootlets and dead vines. Another set of
three eggs, one fresh, the other two with incubation commenced, was
taken from a nest situated like the last, July 9, at the same locality. It
was placed twelve feet from the ground on a horizontal limb of a tree in
an open field. Diameter of nest, 8.00 X 3-i2; depth, 2.50 X 1.25. It wa»
composed of twigs, exteriorly, and lined with rootlets. If a nest is
destroyed the birds build another close by, often in the same tree, some-
times ill the same position as the first. The number of eggs is almost
invariably three, and they apparently rear but one brood in a season, the
dates for fresh eggs ranging from June 20 to July 22. In the shade trees
on a road leading from CataAo to Bayamon, I have seen as many as eight
occupied nests at one time. Several stomachs examined showed the
following contents : male, few small berries; female, one large berry-seed
and remains of insects; male, berries; male, flies, grasshoppers and other
insects; male, Ixirries, coleoptera, and other insects; two males, insects;
male and female, seeds and insects; male, seeds and insects; male, seeds
and insects; male, insects and two large seeds. The seeds were those of
wild fruits on which they feed quite largely. The voice when scolding
an intiuder resembles that of T. tyrannus, and they usher in the morning
with notes at limes quite similar to some the Phcebe occasionally utters.
At limes their notes cover quite a w ide range of variability.
S^. Pitangus taylori. Taylor's Flycatcher. — Of this species almost
the same description may \yc repeated throughout as for the preceding.
In some places it seems a little less common than the (iray Kingbird, in
others it seems fully to equal it in numbers. Its eggs I have not seen
but presume they resemble those of the Gray Kingbird. Two nests with
Vol. X
1903
J BowiJiSH, Birds of Porto Rico, 1 1
^oung found June i and 5, respectively, were not in any way distin-
guishable from those of the latter bird. The notes are sexy similar,
somewhat harsher, and the bird Is perhaps more voluble than its relative,
and bolder and more aggressive in defense of its nest. The stomach con-
tents of several specimens examined was as follows : female, insects ;
male, insects ; male, fruit seeds and skins ; female, lizard about two and
one half inches long, and remains of another lizard and several hornets.
55. Myiarchus antillarum. Antillean Crested Flycatcher. — A
common and fairly evenly distributed bird, observed alike in the vicinity
of San Juan, Aguadilla, and Mayaguez, and on the island of Vieques.
Rather more quiet than many of the flycatchers. Its cry is peculiar and
distinctive, — a long-drawn, mournful whistle, more like the note of the
Acadian Flycatcher than of any other member of this family that I know.
June 1, 1900, near Aguadilla, a pair were greatly disturbed by my approach
to a small tree, in an open field, which contained several holes. Native
boys said they nested in these holes, which seems probable, but at the
time of my visit thej* had apparently not yet built. It is probable that
the eggs and nest resemble, on a smaller scale, those of our Crested Fly-
catcher. The bird has more the appearance of the Phcebe. A few stom-
achs examined contained small shells and coleoptera, small yellow wasps
and remains of beetles and fruit-seeds. Other examples contained a
much larger percentage of fruit remains and seeds.
56. Blacicus blancoi.-^ Common In the western part of the island.
Its most common note is a purring cry somewhat suggesting the note of
the Wood Pewee, and its general habits and method of feeding are aUo
similar to those of that bird. It is not shy, and often pursues its insect
prey in very close proximity to a person, usually with apparent indiffer-
ence, sometimes exhibiting a slight degree of curiosity. A deserted nest
found near Mayaguez, June 27, 1901, could have hardly belonged to any
other bird. It was hung in the tips of a branch of a tree growing in a
coffee plantation, on a hillside, and was fifteen feet from the ground. It
was built of fine hair-like roots, green stringy moss, and two white
flower-petals. It measured 5.50 X 2.00 inches outside, and 2.75 X 1.25
inside. It was very frail and could be seen through from below. It con-
tained one addled ^%%^ and ^oung had apparently been reared in it. The
egg measured 0.75 X 0.56 inches ; it had a light creamy ground color
dotted sparingly, chiefly about the larger end, with specks and dots of
burnt umber and cinnamon. Both the nest and the eggs suggest those
of the Acadian Flycatcher. They are now in the U. S. National Museum.
57. Corvus leucognaphalus. West Indian Crow. — Although I never
met with this species, I was told by two of the men of my company that
they saw some fifteen or twenty at different times at Caguas. In size and
general appearance it is much like our common Crow, but the unexposed
portion of the feathers are snowy white. A government collection of
which I had charge in San Juan contained a mounted example of this
species.
1 2 BowDiSH, Birds of Porto Rico. [ J^^
58. Agelaius chrysopterus. Yellow-shouldbrkd Blackbird. — In
general habits and notes this species is almost the counterpart of our
Red-wing. Common in the vicinity of marshy ground wherever I went.
I have never found their nests, but I presume that in the marshes, among
the cat-tails, flags, bulrushes and other dense growth, almost impenetra-
ble to man, they find a safe retreat, and doubtless nest there in about the
same manner as the Red-wing, in the United States. On June 8, 1901,
I visited one of the large marshes in the vicinity of Mayaguez for the pur-
pose of investigating their breeding habits, but on observing many nearly
full-grown young on the wing and beginning to show the yellow shoul-
der patch, I did not prosecute the search further. In variety and quality
their notes seem almost identical with those of the Red-wing. They
sometimes enter the cornfields with the grackles, for the grain, and both
came to the post stables at Mayaguez to feed on the scattered oats, but
this bird apparently feeds mainly on insects in the vicinity of the marshes.
I also found them on Mona. The sexes are alike in color, and the young
quickly attain the shoulder patch.
59. Icterus portoricensis. Porto Rico Oriole. — An abundant bird
throughout the island, and also found on Vieques. Its feeding habits,
and particularly its notes, suggest the blackbirds rather than the orioles.
Both fruit and insects enter into its bill of fare, but my examination of
the stomachs, of both adults and juveniles, indicated that insect food pre-
dominates. The alarm note is a blackbird-like chip, but I have never
heard a song. June 9, 1900, I observed a young one about half-grown,
which may furnish a clew to the date of breeding. They are said to nest
in the palms. Near Aguadilln, Sept. 23, 1901, I found a nest under one of
these trees, which had evidently been dislodged from the tree. It was
obviously of oriole architecture, and undoubtedly belonged to the present
species. It was well woven of fibrous strips from the foliage of the palm,
and quite resembled a nest of the Orchard Oriole.
60. Icterus icterus. Troupial. — I often saw them in cages and was
told that they were not rare in certain localities, but I did not find them.
An introduced species.
61. Quiscalus brachypterus. Short-winged Gracklr. — Its general
habits and notes are like those of the Bronzed Crackle. Thev nest In
the higher cocoanut and royal palm trees, and sometimes several nests arc
placed in one tree. They are usually nearly or quite invisible from the
ground. I have not seen the eggs but presume they resemble those of
other members of the genus. At Aguadilla on July 24, 1900, native boys
climbed a cocoanut tree and procured a nest with eggs. The eggs had
been destroyed l)efore I heard about them. I obtained the nest and sent
it to the U. S. National Museum. It was built of grasses and bits of wild
cotton (of which there was a quantity growing near), and lined with fine
roots and one feather. In the center there was almost no bottom, prob-
ablv where it re«*ted on a leaf-stem. No mud was used in Its construction.
It measured 2.63 X 2.13 inches in depth, and 6.25 X 3.25 in diameter and
Vol. XX
1903
] BowDisH, Birds of Porto Rico, \ %
bore a general resemblance to nests of the Bronzed Grackle, though
rather less bulky. The nesting season seems to begin the last week of
May or the first of June. The birds have a great variety of notes, gener-
ally resembling those of other grackles. Near Mayaguez, Oct. 2, 1900, I
observed a flock of about a dozen of these birds evidently feeding on
vermin in the hair of a cow. She stood quietly, apparently realizing
their purpose, and they clambered over her belly, legs, udder and teats
and climbed up and down her tail as though it were a weed-stalk. After
standing for some time she moved along and the grackles followed her.
62. Spermestes cucullatus. — This introduced species is locally and sea-
sonally common. Oct. 9, 1901, at Mayaguez, 1 shot a female, and near
the same spot I shot a male, on the 21st. Stomachs contained grass, weed
seeds and fine grit. The habits of this and the next species are strikingly
suggestive of those of the American Goldfinch, particularly the flight
and notes of the next.
63. Sporaeginthus melpoda. This exotic is abundant in some of the
marshy tracts in the vicinity of Mayaguez and Cabo Rojo Lighthouse. I
have never found them far from these wet tracts. Birds collected May 23
and 30 showed indications that they were breeding at the time. They
undoubtedly nest among the flags and rank growth in the marshes, hut
these places are so difiBcult of investigation that 1 failed to find a nest.
64. Ammodramus savannarum. We.st Indian Grassiioitkr Spar-
row. — Fairly common in suitable localities. I collected them near San
Juan, Aguadilla, and Mayaguez, and a nest and eggs from a pasture
studded with dwarf buslies, close to San Juan Bay. The nest was iti a
slight depression in a clump of wire grass, in a small space clear of bushes,
and was composed entirely of fine-grasses. It was very neat, domed over,
growing grasses being woven into the sides, and was well concealed. It
measured 3.75 X 2.00 inches in diameter and 3.00 X -oo inches in depth.
It contained three well incubated eggs, not distinguishal^le from those of
A. s. paaseritius. Another set taken at Agu.ulilla, June 16, 1900. consisted
of three fresh eggs. The nest was built of bits of grass, tiner ones being
used for lining ; it was partially domed and protected by a clump of grass
and situated in a slight hollow in an open field. The bird in appearance
and habits closely resembles A. s. passe n'nt4s.
65. Loxigilla portoricensis. Porto Rico Grosbkak. — I found this
Grosbeak very common in the vicinity of San Juan, Mayaguez, Aguadilla
and Las Marias. The males have a song very much like that of the Song
Sparrows, but exaggerated. They also have call whistles of several notes
each, one of which, a high-pitched note repeated three times rapidly,
is easily imitated. Some of their notes are strikingly like notes of the
Cardinal. The bird is somewhat shy and objects to too close observation,
usually keeping well concealed, and flying away into the bushes when
approached. Its food consists chiefly of fruit and seeds of various kinds.
June 15, 1900, I found a nest near Aguadilla. It was in a ravine
between two of the wooded hills which rise sugar-loaf shaped from the
14 BowDiSH, Birds of Porto Rico. [JjJ
level pastures. It was built among thick bushes, in a clump of twigs
against the body of a small tree, eight feet from the ground and well con-
cealed. The female was so shy that I hardly had a glimpse of her, and
though I went away and waited several hours she apparently did not
return. The nest was built of weed and vine stems, dead leaves and skel-
etons of leaves, and was well domed. It measured 6.25 X 3.00 inches in
diameter, with a depth of 7 inches to the top of the dome, 3 to the lower
edge of the entrance, and 2 inches inside. It contained three eggs of a
decided grosbeak type, in size and appearance much like eggt of the
Rose-breast.
The females of this species are much shyer and more seldom seen than
the males. Oct 25, 1901, I shot, near Mayaguez, a female of this species
which closely resembled a male, but the black was a little more dingy ; the
ovaries contained an ^^^ that would have been deposited the next day.
This would seem to indicate that they may sometimes rear two broods in
a season.
66. Tiaris bicolor omissa. GRAssquiT. — An abundant bird in all of
the localities which I visited except Mona and Decicheo Islands. I have
already dealt with this bird at such length that I will here only refer
the reader to * The Osprey,' Vol. I (new series), p. 45.
67. Tiaris olivacea bryanti. Bryant's Grass^uit. — I did not find
this bird as abundant anywhere as the preceding; although not at all rare
about San Juan and on the Island of Vieques, it was scarce in the vicin-
ity of Mayaguez and Aguadilla. The song is somewhat more musical than
that of T. b. omiisa ; the other notes are much the same. I failed to find
a nest, but a female shot at Vieques, Jan. 30, 1899, would have deposited
an ^^,% the next day.
68. Nesospingus speculiferus. — Although I made special search for
this Tanager I failed to 6nd it. A three days* trip into the mountains
about Las Marias was made especially in search of this species but with-
out success. It is strictlv a bird of the mountains.
69. Euphonia sclateri. — A specimen, taken by a boy with a *bean
shooter' and given to me, was the only one obtained. They are said to
be resident in the vicinity of Ponce, but to visit the country about Maya-
guez only in the late summer and autumn, in small flocks. The above
mentioned specimen showed no development of the ovaries, and the stom-
ach contained seeds of small fruit. The bov who took it said that he
observed small flocks several times, and spoke of their singing in a very
charming manner, hut 1 did not at any time either see or hear any.
70. Spindalis portoricensis. — I did not meet with this bird in the vicin-
ity of San Juan, nor on the smaller islands, but it is abundant near
Aguadilla, Mayaguez, and LaK Marias. The only song I have heard it
utter was a more or less broken succession of sparrow-like chips and
twitters, sharp and strong. The flight is slightly undulating. The food
is about 70% fruit and seeds, the remainder insects. Qiiite unlike the
Grosbeak, this Tanager is unsuspicious, frequently feeding quite dote
to one.
Vol. XX
190S
1 ^ BowDiSH, Birds of Porto Rico, I C
At Aguadilla, June 9, 1900, I took two nests with eggs, from trees grow-
ing in small clumps near a house on a cleared plantation. The first nest
contained two eggs, slightly incubated. The nest measured 4.00 X 2.25
inches in diameter and 2.25 X -75 inches in depth. It was constructed
of fine vines and tendrils, and placed ten feet from the ground, in
an upright fork of a small mango. The second contained three eggs,
advanced in incubation. The nest measured 4.00 X 2.13 in diameter and
2.25 X i*oo inches in depth. It was composed of fine vines and tendrils,
ten feet up in the fork of a small mango tree in a coffee patch near a
house. These nests were frail saucer-shaped structures, greatly resem-
bling in position ancf structure typical nests of the Rose-breasted Gros-
beak. The eggs were also much like those of that bird.
71. Progne dominicensis. West Indian Martin. — I found this bird
abundant at all points visited (except Decicheo Island), including Vieques
and Mona. It apparently nests exclusively about buildings, being seldom
seen away from towns during the breeding season, except on the wild
island of Mona, where it probably nests in rock crevices near the mouths
of the caves. It is migratory. Oct. 13, 1899, 1 recorded the last one for
that year, apparently a young of the season. The first recorded to arrive
for 1901 were three noted on Feb. i. On Feb. 5 I wrote : "About 3 p. m. a
fine rain commenced, and as it began to increase, the air above the bar-
racks was suddenly filled with numljers of Progne domiuicensis^ whirling
and circling in every direction. There must have been hundreds of them.
This lasted for some time when they disappeared as suddenly as they had
come, just as the rain increased to a heavy storm. '^ On July 22, 1899, \
noted, in the city of San Juan, a nest belonging to a pair of these birds,
situated in a niche between the window-cornice and roof of a balconv, on
the front of a house. As the birds seemed to be carrying food, it doubt-
less contained young. In their general appearance, notes and habits,
this species closely resembles the Purple Martin.
72. Petrochelidon fulva. Cuban Cliff Swallow. — Unlike the Mar-
tin, the Cliff Swallow has not abandoned its primitive method of breed-
ing, and I saw no indication of their nesting in the vicinity of buildings.
It also differs from the Martin in that it is apparently not migratory,
seeming to be equally abundant at all seasons. July 23, 1900, near Agua-
dilla, I found a colony of these birds occupying a small cave in a rocky
hill near a road. About fifty or sixty birds were circling about, and in
the roof of the cave there were about fifteen or twenty nests. The cave
was about twenty feet high and the nests inaccessible, but they appeared
to be less elaborate than those of their American relatives. 1 intended to
visit this cave again with a ladder but circumstances prevented. The
stomach of one shot July 1 contained a great quantity of small beetles.
In company with about half a dozen of its kind this bird was circling
about a tree and occasionally alighting in the top branches, doubtless
engaged in catching these beetles. In notes, etc., this bird resembles the
United States species.
1 6 BowDiSH, Birds of Porto Rico^ [^^^
73. Vireo calidris barbatula. Black-whiskered Vireo. — Abundant
wherever I went. Apparently at least partially migratory, but of this my
evidence is not very positive. On May i, 1900, I found a finished nest
near Aguadilla, on a bush-grown hillside. It was hung in a horizontal
fork of a bush, about seven feet from the ground, at the back of a tiny
clearing just oft a trail. It was composed of fibres and cottony substance
and exceedingly handsome, somewhat resembling some specimens of
Beirs Vireo. I visited it again on the 20th, but found the nest half torn
away and fragments of egg shells lying on the ground beneath. June 9 I
found another nest, from being attracted to the tree by the singing of the
male. The female was on the nest and remained there while I climbed
the tree to within eight feet of her, and jarring the limb and throwing
sticks failed to dislodge her, she only crouching closer into the nest.
This nest greatly resembled typical nests of V. olivacea,, and was not nearly
so handsome as the first. The two eggs were hardly distinguishable
from those of V. olivacea. The nest and eggs are in the National
Museum. The birds watched the rifling of their home without protest.
On the same day I found another nest, which I again visited on the 12th.
It was twelve feet up, in the tip of a branch overhanging a road. This
was another handsome nest, like the first. It contained nemlv hatched
young. The song and notes of this species resemble those of V. olix'acea.
Thev eat almost as much fruil and seeds as insect food.
74. Vireo latimeri. — I first noted this bird across the Bay from San
Juan, back in the bush-grown hills, on April i, 1900. Hearing a new note,
I stopped and began an investigation which ended in the securing of an
adult male and female and a two-thirds grown young male. These birds
were presented to the National Museum, and were the first received by
it in some years, the species being then represented in the Museum col-
lections by an old and discolored specimen. From the time of collecting
the above three specimens until the late summer and autumn of 1901,
I found these birds rare, and exceptionally silent, when, returning to May-
aguez from Mona Island, I found they were in full song and quite numer.
ous on a certain bush-grown hillside. Th^- were not, however, readily
secured, as they mostly kept to the most impenetrable jungles, and though
far from shv, were so restless that one mijjht be fortv rods awav bv the
time 1 reached the spot where I had just heard him. I succeeded, how-
ever, in securing a series of about twenty birds for the National
Museum. The song at this time, though \ ireo-like, was distinctive, and
while not easy to indicate on paper, would not he readily forgotten. On
fune 15, H/x), I described in my notebook a quite ditferent song, as fol-
lows : " This bird has a note quite different from that of any other Vireo
1 have heard. It sounds somewhat like too turoo^ with the accent on the
first syllable, and the last two run together and prolonged." It >%as music-
ally whistled and repeated a number of times. On June 21, k/X), 1 wrote :
"A Vireo /a ti ni r ri cnn^c within six feet of me. Me was singing, and the
song was quite different from those previously recorded, uiore vireo-like.
VoL XX
1903
n BowDisH, Birds of Porto Rico. I y
/
though still distinct from that of any other vireo I have heard." This was
the song I heard so much, later on, from the Mayaguez hillside; it was
repeated at frequent intervals for about five minutes, the bird then remain-
ing silent for about the same space, and then beginning again. A male
shot April 22 was evidently then breeding, and the immature birds secured
in September and October would seem to indicate the rearing of more
than one brood in a season. Their food seems to consist almost wholly
of small insects, very few seeds being found in the stomachs examined,
this species being quite different in this respect from Vireo calidris,
75. Ccereba portoricensis. Porto Rico Honey-creeper. — Like the
Gray Kingbird, the Honey-creeper is a characteristic bird all over the
island, in the shade trees of the city streets, in the coffee plantations, in
the woods and bushy tangles, and nesting in every possible situation. In
habits it resembles both wrens and warblers. Their manner of feeding
is somewhat suggestive of the chickadees, as they climb among the leaves
and flowers, and the food, as shown by stomachs I have examined, includes
small insects, largely coleopterous, spiders, and small worms. The nests
are built somewhat like those of the Marsh Wrens, but of firmer material,
with an entrance at one side, placed in the tips of branches, and varying
from two to fifty feet from the ground. The entrance has usually a porch
roof, so to speak, extending outward and downward over it. The prevail-
ing materials are fine rootlets, grasses, vines, straws, and tendrils, with
occasional feathers, hair, bits of wool, and wild cotton, and other mate-
rials are more or less frequently utilized. The measurements of a few
nests are as follows :
OuUide depth.
Inside depth.
Outside diameter.
Inside diameter.
No. 1.
6.25
2.25
3.75 X 300
1.63
" 2.
5.00
2.25
3.00 X 4.50
1.63
" 3-
4.00
2.50
4.00
1.50
" 4-
6.75
2.50
350
1-25
" S-
4-25
2.00
4.00
1.25
The inside depth is from the bottom of the entrance to the bottom of
the nest. These are probably average examples. Of twenty sets of eggs
examined, one was of 4, nine were of 3, and ten were of 2 eggs each.
The eggs are of a light creamy ground tint, varying in some examples
to lighter, and in others to pinkish buff. The markings of fine dots are
of a decidedly darker shade, a sort of salmon, and vary from being quite
sparse in some to others in which the ground tint is nearly obscured.
The song is a wheezy trill, and the alarm note a sharp chirp, somewhat
like a warbler^s note, and between these they have quite a variety of inter-
mediate notes.
76. Mniotilta varia. Black and White Warbler. — A fairly common
winter resident, though much less so than in Cuba. Observed in Vieques
1 8 BowDisH, Birds of Porto Rico. \jySL
and at Mavaguez. Fir^t observed in 1899 on Jan. 17, last seen Feb. 18. In
1900, first seen Feb. 3 ; last, no record. In 1901, first, Oct. 10; no other
record.
77. Compsothlypis americana. Parula Warblkr. — The most com-
mon of the warblers in winter. In Vieques particularly abundant. Win-
ter of 1899-1900, first, Jan. iS; lastrApril 8. I also saw a bird June 12,
1900, which at close quarters I was sure was this species, but did not
secure it. 1900-01, first, Nov. 5 ; last, Feb. 23 ; 1901-02, first, Oct. 25.
Have found seeds in the stomach of one of these birds.
78. Dendroica tigrina. Cape May Warbler. — One noted at Maya-
guez, Oct. 30, 1 90 1.
Dendroica petechia bartholemica. Porto Rico Yellqw Warbler. —
Apparently the main point of difference between this form and D. astiva
is that there is more rufous on the crown of the present bird. The
rufous streaks on the sides and breast are perhaps a little more pro-
nounced. They are very abundant in the mangrove swamps about San
Juan Bay. I also found a few in a low, bush-grown, rather swampy
cocoanut grove near Mayaguez. The song and notes seem exactly like
those of D. <gstiva.
I never found a nest, but a female shot April 8, indicated that breeding,
if not already begun, would soon commence, as was also indicated by a
specimen taken April 22. Stomachs examined contained insect food only,
chiefly beetles ; in one a green beetle about one eighth of an inch long
predominating. A wounded bird kept for a short time ate hard-boiled
^%% readily.
79. Dendroica coronata. Myrtle Warbler. — Though abundant in
Cuba in winter, this bird is apparently not so in Porto Rico. At Vieques
I shot a male Jan. 22, 1900, and another Jan. 30. The contents of the
stomach of the first was insects, of the second, good-sized seeds. In Cuba
the larger proportion of the food is seeds. *
80. Dendroica maculosa. Magnolia Warbler. — Apparently Uct
from an abundant winter visitant. I noted one in a tree in a small park
in the city of San Juan, Sept. 26, 1899, and was surprised to see it so early.
I also shot a male from a tree beside a street in Mayaguez, Dec. 26, 190a
Stomach contents, beetles about one eighth of an inch long.
81. Dendroica adelaidse. Adelaid Warbler. — This species, peculiar
to Porto Rico, I met with only in the vicinity of Aguadilla, and there in
no g^eat numbers, chiefly about a glade between two hills, where the nest
of LoMtgilla fortoriceusis was taken. May 18, 1900, I shot two males,
their condition indicating that they were nesting. The stomach of one
contained small caterpillars, that of the other, spiders ; a female and juve-
nile male, shot June 15, contained small insects. This young one had not
been long out of the nest. Aug. 5, male and female, stomach contents,
small insects. They have a warbler-like chip, but I have never heard a
song.
83. Dendroica palmanim. Palm Warbler. — Not a very common
winter visitant, according to my experience. Shot a male in a mmngroTe
^^^^^ ] BowDiMi, Bt'rds of Porto Rico, 1 9
•wamp on San Jumn Bay, Feb. la, 1900 ; stomach contents, long spider-
legs. Another male, March 10, near same spot ; stomach contained
insects. April 8, in same locality, a female, stomach contained insects.
A large number of stomachs examined in Cuba contained seeds.
83. Dendroica discolor. Prairis Warblbr. — Next to the Parula Wai^
bier the most common of the migrant waiH)Iers. Winter of 1899-1900,
first seen Jan. 17 ; last, no record ; 1900, first, Sept. 33 ; no record for last :
1901-03, first, Sept. 30 ; no record for last. Stomachs of most Porto
Rican birds contained insects only, but I have found only seeds in the
stomachs of some Cuban birds.
84. Seiurus aurocapillua. Oven-bird. — Fairly common, though less
so than in Cuba. I have no dates to offer for arrivals and departures.
Shot a male at Vieques, Jan. 16, 1900 ; stomach containing eight good
sized seeds. Dec. i, 1900, male, at Mayaguez; stomach contents, insects.
Saw one at Mayaguez, Oct. 14, 1901, and shot a male Oct. 3i ; stomach
contents, small quantity of insect matter.
85. Seiurus motacilla. Louisiana Water-Thrush. — This bird was
not recorded from Porto Rico previous to the time I obtained it at
Vieques. Dec. 37, 1809, I shot a female ; stomach contents, fine insect
remains. Jan. 32, 1900, male ; stomach contents, insects. Jan. 32,
female, stomach contents, one small snail, and water insects. Nov. 30, at
Mayaguez, sex ?, stomach contained fine aquatic insects. Not rare.
86. Seiurus noveboracensis. Water-Thrush. — Not found as com-
monly as the last. Shot a female at Mayaguez, Nov. 30, 1900 ; stomach
contents, small aquatic insects. Shot a female at Mona Island, Aug. iS,
1901 ; stomach empty, condition very fat. It seemed strange indeed to find
a bird of this kind on this bare dry rock.
87. Setophaga ruticilla. American Redstart. — A quite common win-
ter visitant Saw one at Mayaguez, Sept. 24, 1900. Noted one at Vieques
Nov. 30, 1899 ; another at Mayaguez, Nov. 4, 1900. One of the very few
warblers in whose stomach I have not found seeds.
88. Mimus polyglottos orpheus. West Indian Mockingbird. — Com-
mon wherever I went, except on the islands of Mona and Decicheo.
Appearance, song, and habits much the same as those of the American
form. I found a nest at San Juan, March I3, 1899, containing three young
about ten days old. I also found a nest at Aguadilla, May 19, 1900, con-
taining seven eggs. It is possible that two],femaIes laid in this nest but the
eggs were quite uniform in appearance, and were advanced in incubation.
This nest was about ten feet up in a small tree, by a fence near a house.
The nests, situations, eggs, etc., are apparently not different from those of
M. polyglottos. Stomachs examined contained : a single dragonfly ; blue
berries; two small centipedes, and a large beetle, minus the head; one
large striped beetle. The natives take the young from the nest and rear
them, and prize them very highly as cage song birds. They are appar-
ently ytry easily reared. A boy offered me a healthy young bird for ten
cents.
20 BowDisH, Birds of Porto Rico, [j^
89. Margarops fuscatus. — I never met with this bird on the main island,
but they were fairly common in the creek-bottoms at Vieques, and abun-
dant among the rocks in the scraggy growth on Decicheo, and still more
so around the openings of the caves on Mona Island, where it is the most
characteristic land bird. Here I saw a number of bulky nests, built of
twigs, on shelves and in niches of the rocks, at the roofs and near the
mouths of the caves. These the lighthouse keeper told me belonged to
these thrushes, and on Aug. 8 I found one containing the skeleton and
feathers of a half grown young, establishing the identity beyond doubt.
On Decicheo I shot four birds; a female, July 6, 1900, stomach containing
dark purple berries ; July 9, two females and one male, stomachs of male
and one female contained dark purple berries, the other the entire body o(
a bombacine moth, about one and a quarter inches long. Specimens
taken at Mona had fed chiefly on berries and the fruit of the giant cactus,
a katydid or occasional other insect entering into their bill of fare. At
Decicheo, on July 8 I made the following note : *' As dusk came on I sat in
a grotto in the rocks, listening to the vesper song of the Margarops fus"
catus. Many of the notes are strongly suggestive of the vesper notes of
the Robin. One characteristic note, however, is a whistled tu-whe^^ fre-
quently interspersed in the Robin notes. Its vesper song is quite as dis-
tinct from its daylight carols as the Robin^s. The daylight notes, as they
vary, recall notes of the Robin, Catbird, and several of our Thrushes.*'
The bird sings in the evening until it is fairly dark, and its morning
notes are ringing with the first streaks of light. Its alarm note is strik-
ingly like that of the Catbird, but rather louder. It is shy and retiring,
retreating out of sight the moment it realizes that it is seen.
90. Mimocichla ardosiacea. Quite common around Aguadilla and
Mayaguez, in the hills back of Catafio, and near Las Marias, but I did not
find it on the smaller islands. Its notes are somewhat like those of the pre-
ceding species, but the song is far inferior in variety, clearness and sweet-
ness. Its alarm note is entirely different, being difficult of description, a
rapidly repeated note something like that of the Cuban Paroquet, on a
small scale, and a single nasal quirk. It also has a note somewhat resem-
bling that often uttered by Wilson's Thrush in late summer. Its food
consists of both fruit and insects, the former greatly preponderating.
Though somewhat shy it is less so than M. sckistacea of Cuba, and far leas
so than Margarops fuscatus. I saw a deserted nest, bulky and well cupped,
looking much like an overgrown nest of the Wood Thrush, in the fork of a
tree, in the hills near Mayaguez, which could hardly have belonged to anjr
other species than the present. I have shot immature birds in August.
91. Conurua maugei ( ?). — The occurrence of a CoHurus in Porto Rico
has been considered doubtful. That there is, however, a Paroquet still
fairly common in the mountains near{Lares every Porto Rican will testifjr,
and I met a considerable number of Americans who had seen them. J
VoL XX
iqos
J BowDisH, Bird$ of Porto Rico. 2 1
did not visit the section referred to mjself, but I was offered live birds
which I was assured were brought from there, and at a price that could
hardljr have been made on birds brought from other islands. It seems to
me that the Paroquet referred to in Dr. Richmond's list as " Conurus lati-
/forms — Mona onljr?" should have a place in the list of Porto Rican
birds. Comurms gundlacki Cabanis, supposed to be the same as C maugti^
was described from Mona Island.
Supplementary List.
The principal works and papers referring especially to the birds
of Porto Rico, cited in the subjoined list, are the following.
1864. Taylor, E. Cavendish. Five Months in the West Indies. Part
II. Martinique, Dominica, and Porto Rico. •< /^/j, April, 1864, pp.
157-164.
Notes on 48 species, including 31 observed in Porto Rico.
1866. Bryant, Henry. A list of Birds from Porto Rico presented to the
Smithsonian Institution, by Messrs. Robert Swift and George Lati-
mer, with descriptions of New Species or Varieties. < Proc. Boston
Soc. Nat. Hist., X, 1866, p . 248-257.
Records 41 species, of which 9 are described as new.
1870. SuNDEVALL, Carl J. Foglama pa on Portorico < Otfvert.
KoHtgl. Vetensk. Akad. Fbrkandl. for ar 1869 (1870?), pp. 593-604.
About 100 species are enumerated, with annotations.
1874. GuNDLACH, Juan. Beitrag zur Ornithologie der Insel Portorico.
KJourn.f. Orn., 1874, PP- 304-3i5-
Annotated list of 116 species.
1878. GuNDLACH, Juan. Neue Beitr ge zur Ornithologie der Insel Por-
torico. K^Journ. f. Orn.y 1878, 157-194.
1878. GuNDLACH, Juan. Apuntes para la Fauna Puerto Rtguena. <
Anal. Soc. Esfi. Hist. Nat.^ VII, 1878, pp. 135-422. Aves, pp. 141-422
Bibliographer and collation of previous authors, and extended notices
of the species, 153 in number.
1889. Cory, Charles B. The Birds of the West Indies. Roy. 8vo, pp.
324-
Porto Rican birds are included, mostly on the authority of pre-
vious writers. Gives descriptions and bibliographical references.
The following 70 species of birds, not met with by me, have
been recorded from Porto Rico by various authors, mainly by Dr.
Juan Gundlach.
1. Colymbus dominicensis. Taylor, 1864; Gundlach, 1878.
2. Sterna maxima. Gundlach.
3. Sterna sandvicensis acuflavida. Gundlach, 1874.
4. Sterna dougalli. Gundlach, 1874.
2 2 BowDiSH, Birds of Porto Rico. [li.
5. HydrockeiidoH nigra suriuamemsis. Gundlach, 1878.
6. PhaetkoH (Bike reus. Sundevall.
7. Mareca americana, Gundlach, 1878.
8. ^Mtrquedmla discors. Gundlach, 1874.
9. PotcHonetta bakamemsis, Gundlach.
10. spatula clypeata. Sundevall.
11. Dafila acuta. Gundlach, 1878.
12. Aytkya affinis. Gundlach, 1878.
13. Aytkya collaris. Gundlach, 1878.
14. Brismatura Jamaicensis. Gundlach, 1878.
15. Chen hyperborea nivalis ( ?) = Chen hyperborean Gundlach, 1878.
16. Dendrocygna arborea. Gundlach.
17. Aj'aia ajaja. Gundlach.
18. Guara alba. Gundlach, 1878.
19. Plegadis autumnalis. Gundlach, 1878.
20. Botaurus lentiginosus. Gundlach, 1878.
21. Ardetta exilis. Bryant, 1866; Gundlach, 1878.
22. Ardea ocidentalis. Gundlach, 1874.
23. Garzetta candidissima. Gundlach, 1878.
24. Hydranassa tricolor rujicollis. Brjant, 1866 ; Gundlach, 1878.
25. Nycticorax nycticorax ncevius. Gundlach, 1878.
26. Aramus giganteus. Bryant, Sundevall, Gundlach.
27. Porxana flaviventris. Gundlach, 1878.
28. Porxana Carolina. Brvant, 1866 ; Gundlach, 1878.
29. Porxana jamaicensis. ^'Observado por el Dr. Hall in Bayamon in
Julio 1879." Gundlach. in MS. — J. A. Allen.
30. lonornis martinica. Bryant, 1866 ; Gundlach, 1878.
31. Fulica americana. Gundlach, 1878.
32. Himantopus mexicanus. Sundevall, 1869 ; Gundlach, 1874, 1878.
33. Gallinago delicata. Sundevall, 1869 ; Gundlach, 1878.
34. Micropalama himantopus. Sundevall, 1869.
35. Erennetes pusillus. Sundevall, 1869.
36. Calidris arenaria. Gundlnch, 1878.
37. Limosa fedoa. Gundlach, 1878.
38. Tot anus melanoleucus. Sundevall, 1869.
39. Sympkemia scmipalmata. Gundlach, 1878.
i|0. Numenius hudsonicus. Gundlach, 1S78.
41. Numenius borealis. Gundlach, 1878.
42. Sguatarola helvetica. Gundlach, 1878.
43. Charadrius dominicus. Gundlach, 1878.
44. ^"Egialitis meloda. Gundlach, 1S78.
45. ^'Jlgittlitis semipalmata. (lundlach, 1878.
46. /fLgialitis wilsonia. Gundlnch, 1874.
47. Arenaria morinella. Recorded by Cvundlach. There was a speci-
men in a San Juan collection, but the locality was hardly sure.
48. Jacana spinosa, Gundlach, 1878.
Vol. XX
] BowDiSH, Birds of Porto Rico, 23
49. Columha coremsis, Gundlach, 1878.
50. Columba inormafa, Gundlach.
51. Buteo piatypterus, Gundlach, 1878.
52. Faico peregrinms anmtitm, Gundlach , 1878.
53. Falco columha rius. Sun de vail, 1869 ; Gundlach, 1878.
54. CoccyxMS erytkropktkalmtts, Gundlach.
55. Amtrostomms vociferms, Clark P. Streator shot a female, recorded
bjr Corjr (Auk, 1889, p. 276) — the only record to date, apparently.
^6. CkordeiUs virg-imiauus minor. Skin in the National Museum from
the San Juan collection ; locality doubtful.
57. Lamfornis viridis. Gundlach, Cory, etc Peculiar to Porto Rico.
58. Eulampis kolosericems. Recorded by Gundlach. There are two
skins in the National Museum from Culebra.
59. Trockilms colubris. Gundlach, 1878.
60. Bellona exilis, Cory, 1886-88.
61. TyranMus tyraMnus. Cory says : '^ Accidental in Cuba, Porto Rico?
San Domingo?"
62. Pyrrkomitris cucuHata, Gundlach, 1878. (Introduced.)
63. Hirundo erythrogasttr, Gundlach, 1878.
64. Tachycineta bicolor. Gundlach, 1878.
65. Riparia riparia. Gundlach, 1878.
66. Vireo olivaceus, Gundlach, 1878.
67. Dendroica cceruiesc^ns, Gundlach, 1878. Evidently not common
in Porto Rico.
68. Dendroica striata, Gundlach, 1878.
69. Dendroica dominica, Gundlach, 1878.
70. Geothlypis trickas. Gundlach, 1878.
24 Anthony, Migration of Richardson's Grouse, \Aw^.
MIGRATION OF RICHARDSON'S GROUSK
BY A. W. ANTHONY.
It was recently my fortune to spend several months within the
range of Richardson's Grouse, and to witness its very extensive
migrations to and from its breeding grounds, migrations so dis-
similar to anything with which I am familiar in the other closely
allied species, I have thought my notes on the subject worthy of
record.
In order that the character of the migration may be more fully
understood, it is necessary that I give a somewhat detailed
description of the region over which my observations extend.
The mining camp of Sparta, which was the base of my opera-
tions, lies at the lower edge of the pine belt at 4100 feet altitude
at the base of the Powder River Mountains and about fifteen
miles west of Snake River in eastern Oregon.
North of the camp, the ridges, which for the most part trend
north and south, are cut by the deep cafion of Eagle Creek.
Running easterly, cutting a gap in the heavy growth of pine, tam-
arack and fir, of from fi\Q hundred to one thousand feet in depth
and half a mile in \yidth north of the Eagle, the ridges of the
main range rise to approximately eight thousand feet above the
sea, dividing the waters of Powder River from those of the
Wallow. In these higher altitudes is found the true home of
Richardson's, Franklin's and the Gray Ruffed Grouse.
South of Sparta the country falls away rapidly in a series of
sage-covered benches and ridges to Powder River, from which it
rises with equal rapidity to the divide between its waters and those
of Burnt River, known locally as the Lookout Mountains.
The higher parts and deeper canons of this range are well
wooded with pine and fir, but from information furnished by the
residents, no grouse winter there.
On the first of March, 1902, when the first of the migrating
grouse made their appearance along the edge of the timber north
of Sparta, the snow was from two to four feet in depth, though the
lower slopes near Powder River were bare and had begun to
show the first signs of sprouting grass. Snow squalls and rough
Vol. XX
1903
] Anthony, Migration of Richardson's Groust. 25
weather seemed to check the southward flight until about the 10th,
although a few birds were passing over daily. The tracks on the
snow bore ample testimony as to the manner in which the migra-
tion was made.
From the higher slopes north of Eagle Canon, the birds sailed
until the rising ground brought them to the surface of the snow
on the south side of the creek, usually well above the cafion.
From this time until the highest point of the ridge south was
reached the journey was performed on foot. Immediately north
of Sparta lies a conical peak known as Baldy, some seven hun-
dred feet above camp, the highest point in the ridge south of
Eagle Creek. From the top of Baldy, and in an area not to
exceed one hundred feet square, I think fully eighty-five percent
of the grouse passing over Sparta take their departure. From
east, north and west up the steep, snowy slopes hundreds of
trails led toward the top and not one could be found leading down-
ward. The flight from the top of the peak was almost invariably
undertaken at about sunrise or sunset. It is only when birds are
disturbed and driven from the peak that they will attempt to cross
to the southern ridge during the middle of the day. Throughout
the day grouse are arriving along the upper slopes of Baldy,
singly, in pairs, and small flocks that have perhaps formed since
the southward march began, as I think they do not winter in com-
pany, but the flight from the peak is usually in flocks of from a
dozen to a hundred birds. Though the ridge south of Sparta is
four hundred feet or more lower than the top of Baldy, it is fully
a mile and a half distant in an air line, and the flight is seldom
sustained to carry the birds to the top. Usually they alight on
the snow half way up the slope, and after a few moments' rest,
continue the journey on foot ; those passing over in the evening
spend the night, I think, in the pines, the last of which are seen
along this divide ; but those arriving in the morning soon pass on,
walking down any of the small ridges leading toward Powder
River. rom the lava cliffs, which form the canon along this
part of the river, they fly across to the lower slopes of Lookout
Mountains, up which they walk, continuing the migration as far,
at least, as the valley of Burnt River.
On arriving at the first bare ground, gravel is eagerly sought
N
26 Anthony, Migration of RickardsoiCs Gromse, [jili!
for, after which the tender green shootd are greedily devoured,
and the remainder of the migration is much more leisurely per-
formed.
The first birds which I saw the past spring were males, but I
could not be sure that either sex preceded the other in migration.
A few birds undoubtedly remain and nest throughout the timbered
region of Powder River Mountains, but the percentage is small
indeed compared with those that nest on the bare sage plains
along Powder and Burnt Rivers. Many of the nests are placed in
the shelter of the scattered growth of chokecherry, aspen, or cotton-
wood that fringes the water courses tributary to the river ; and a
few of these nests may produce young that reach maturity, but
fully as many birds lay in the shelter of a bare rock, or scanty
sage brush in the open plain, in company with Sage Grouse ; and
fortunate indeed is the bird, nesting in such location, that raises
its young. In a circuit of not over six miles from my camp on
Powder River the past May, were ranged not less than twenty
thousand sheep which tramped out the nests so completely, that,.
while finding dozens of broken nests, I saw not one that had not
been destroyed, of either Richardson's or Sage Grouse, and only
one young bird. Nevertheless, many of them do escape, as their
numbers testify, although I am told, on good authority, that there
are very few in comparison with their former numbers.
The love note of the male Richardson's Grouse bears no
resemblance to that of its near kinsman, the Sooty Grouse of the
Cascade and Coast Ranges. From a perch in a tall fir, the latter
utters a series of hoots, deep and throaty, while the subject of the
present sketch has, so far as I have heard, but a single nasal toot^
loud and far reaching. When uttered the bird is usually strutting
on the ground before a member of the gentle sex, with the tail
spread and elevated and the wings drooping, resembling nothing
so much as a turkey gobbler in miniature. The note is uttered
as. with lowered head and threatening mien, he rushes at the hen,,
or p>erhaps at anjntruding rival.
The return migration is less pronounced in its beginning, and
more gradual in its progress. Toward the last of July the broods
of well grown young, attended by the adults, begin to appear along
the ridges, returning as they came by walking invariably up to the
^**\*903^1 GRUonLL.i.Ai!iT>T>AGGBrrTy Birds of Coro/iados Islands, 2*]
tops of the hills and ridges and as invariably flying as near to the
top of the next as their gradually descending flight will carry them.
Before the middle of August, the migration is in full swing, and
flocks are seen each evening, passing over Sparta. Frequently
they alight in the streets and on the house-tops. I recall with a
smile the memory of a flodc of a dozen or more which lit one
evening in front of the hotel. For a time pistol bullets and bird
shot made an accident policy in some safe company a thing to be
desired, but strange to relate none of the regular residents of the
town were injured. The same may be said of most of the grouse>
though one, in the confusion, ran into the livery stable and took
refuge in a stall, where it was killed with a stick.
Straggling flocks from south of Powder River prolong the fall
migration until near the first of October, after which none are
seen below the high elevations north of Eagle Creek.
AN ORNITHOLOGICAL VISIT TO LOS CORONADOS
ISLANDS, LOWER CALIFORNIA.
by j. grinnell and f. s. daggett.
Itinerary.
Twenty miles due south of Point Loma, near San Diego, Cali-
fornia, and half that distance from the Lower California coast, in
Mexican waters, is a group of small islands known as Los Coron-
ados Islands. The group consists of four principal islands with
smaller outlying rocks, some of which are only completely sepa-
rated from the main islands at high tide. The largest, or South
Island, is a huge ridge some two miles long and of varying width.
The sides are precipitous and impossible to scale except at the
few favorable points. The backbone presents an irregular sky-
line like the back of a dromedary. The southern extremity, about
six hundred feet high, ends in a bold promontory. At the north
the ridge ends in detached rocks. A cove on the east side, about
28 Grinnell and Daggett, Birds of Coromados Islands, \jSl.
one third distant from the north end, affords shelter with good
anchorage for small craft, and at present is the landing place of a
launch which makes a trip to the island from San Diego whenever
five or more persons wish to enjoy the fishing, which in these
little frequented waters is said to be unexcelled.
About a mile north of South Island appears a jagged point of
land, little more than a great irregular rock, and scarcely a fifth of
a mile in extent. Lying between these two, though rather out of
line to the westward and nearest the latter, is another somewhat
larger mass of rock. Both of these together are known as Middle
Islands.
Away to the north some four miles, and most inaccessible of
all, lies the fourth island, which completes the group and is called
North Island. It is almost a duplicate of South Island, if any-
thing, more rugged, but not so large. Red sandstone crops out
in places, with here and there small caves and overhanging
shelves, a feature evidently attractive t many seabirds. An entire
absence of water on any of the islands during the long dry sea-
son prevents the existence of goats, foxes and other land mam-
mals usually present on the larger islands off our southern coast.
North Island, however, is literally overrun with mice. These and
the land birds must be able to do without water unless they can
drink the salt sea water.
On August 6, 1902, we availed ourselves of an opportunity to
visit the Coronados Islands in the launch rather than trust to the
uncertain moments of sailing craft, heretofore the only means of
reaching the islands. A few miles out from the pier, at Coronado
Beach, opposite San Diego, whence we embarked, we began to
meet with birds, singly and in small companies. Cormorants,
gulls and pelicans scattered before the sharp puff of the launch,
while several Forster Terns seemed to be attracted for a minute,
eyeing us curiously before flying off. As we approached South
Island, bird life made itself more apparent, the surface of the
water being dotted with cormorants and pelicans, many of them
being young-of-the-year. Heermann g^lls in immature plumage,
recent arrivals from their breeding grounds far to the south, kept
in constant view. Great patches of white on the rocky headlands
and outlying rocks indicated favorite roosting places.
^ »9<?^3 Grinnell and Daggbtt, Birds of Coronados Islands, 2 O
Iimoediately upon our arrival at South Island we struck out in
the skifiF, towed over for this purpose, to visit the easternmost of
the two Middle Islands which looked particularly favorable. We
rowed out of the cove and coasted along the rocky shore, a
favorite place for tumstones and oystercatchers, past the detached
ledges at the north and where pelicans and cormorants roosted to
the water's edge, and finally headed directly across the intervening
channel, swerving now and then to avoid masses of kelp. As
we neared our* objective point several oystercatchers came flying
out to meet us, with their loud cries, and in one of these we recog-
nized Hcttnaiopus Jrazari^ a species neither of us had ever before
seen. Making a landing even in calm weather is attended by a
feeling of uncertainty, for one has to select a shelf of rock where
the water deepens at once, so that the boat will not be thrown
down hard against submerged pinnacles by the receding swells.
One has to swing the boat in just right on the top of a wave and
leap to the exposed rock at the proper moment. We managed to
make a dry landing, and get our boat safely hauled up on a flat
rock. Six hours later the tide had fallen, and we experienced
much difliculty in getting the skiff back to the water uninjured.
But such little experiences, if not too serious, lend continued
interest to a short vacation trip like ours. This small island proved
of unexpected interest, for here we found an accessible breeding
colony of petrels. The afternoon was entirely occupied in digging
out and taking care of these birds, their young and eggs. One
of us made the circuit of the island, meeting with oystercatchers,
turnstones, and tatlers on the partly exposed reefs, their feeding
grounds. We started back across the channel at dusk. Flying-
fish, startled by the oars, darted past us with wonderful velocity,
often passing uncomfortably near. Cormorants and pelicans left
the rocks as we glided by, and our entrance to the cove was her-
alded by the weird cry of some disturbed gull.
The next morning, August 7, we made an early start for North
Island, this time leaving both Middle Islands well to the left. Cut-
ting through the belt of kelp, which completely girdles North
Island, we made a landing at about the center of the east side.
Here a short inlet leads to an amphitheatre-like slope which rises
steeply to the ridge several hundred feet above. The unusually
30 Grinnell and Daggett, Birds of Coronados I$lands. ffJlJ^
nigged nature of this island makes it the favored one of the
group for the larger seabirds, thousands of which annually nest
here. We spent the forenoon in climbing about the rookeries
and examining the nesting sites, most of which were by this
time abandoned. Our visit was much too late, for most of the
young had left. This locality would furnish many an interesting
object for the bird photographer during April and May. At noon
we returned to the cove at North Island, where the launch met us,
and in the evening of the same day we were baclc at San Diego
with many hours of tedious bird-skinning to look forward to.
The following is a more detailed account of all the birds we
found at Los Coronados Islands.
Notes on Species.
1. PtychoramphuB aleuticus. Cassin Auklet. — Large plats of soft
ground near the top of North Island were percolated with burrows, larger
than the normal ones of petrels. Many were dug into but proved empty
save for fragments of white egg-shells and in one case a dead young
Cassin Auklet. Large numbers of this species evidently breed here
earlier in the year.
2. Lama occidentalia. Western Gull. — This species was numerous
about all the islands. At North Island clouds of fully fledged young and
adults kept circling about overhead during our stay there. A few young
still unable to flv w^erc met with toward the south end of this island.
These were possessed of remarkable agility in scrambling among the
rocks into places of concealment.
3. Lama heermanni. Hrbrmann Gull. — Many gulls of this species
.were congregated over the kelp beds among the islands. All seen were
in the dark-headed, immature plumage, not a single adult being observed.
These were all probably northward migrants from some winter breeding
ground far to the southward.
4. Oceanodroma melania. Black Petrel. — This species was breeding
sparingly on Middle and North Islands in company with the Socorro
Petrel. We obtained but four specimens, each with an egg. The four
eggs were white, though more or less nest-soiled, and unspotted. They
measured, in incheSf 1*50 X 1.04, 1^4 X ix)3, 1.37 X 1.08, and 1.52 X 1.02,
or, in millimeters, 38 X 26.7, 36.7 X 26.4, 35 X 27.5, and 38.6 X 26. Three
of these eggs were on the point of hatching, the other being infertile.
The nesting burrows of the Black Petrel seemed to us indistinguishable
from those of the Socorro Petrel described beyond. Bonaparte's ProctU
laria melania (Compte Rendu, XXXVIII, April 1854, p. 662) was described
^**^»9^1 G*'''*^*^!' ^^^ Daggett, Birds of Coronados Islands. 7 I
'Without any more definite locality than ''California" being indicated ; but
as many of Delattre^s birds are stated to have come from San Diego, it
seems probable that the type of O, melamia was from this vicinity.
5. Oceanodroma socorroensis. Socorro Pbtrel. — The Socorro
Petrel was found breeding commonly on both North and Middle Islands,
but on the latter they were most accessible, and here on the afternoon of
August 6, we secured by continuous hard work twenty-four adults, with
many young and eggs. This island presents Iwo jagged peaks about a
hundred feet high, with a sag between the two. To one side of this saddle
is a basin perhaps two hundred feet across unevenly edged with ragged
ledges. The bottom of the basin farthest from the saddle has been under-
mined by a subterranean channel connecting with the surf on the outside
of the wall. Here one can look down thirty feet or more and see the
water surging back and forth with the swell. The rest of the basin sloping
-up to the saddle is covered by disintegrated rock from the surrounding
walU, and supports a scanty growth of dwarfed * buck-thorn ' bushes.
Where this bush is thickest a few inches of peaty soil has accumulated
and this we found to be a favorite burrowing place for the petrels. Other
parts of the island were also occupied, but' in those places the burrows
-usually ended underneath or between heavy fragments of rock and so
were mostly impossible to reach. We were first made aware of the
presence of the colony by the strong and characteristic odor of petrel oil,
€or of course not a bird is to be seen above ground during daylight.
Following the scent we soon found the openings, generally more or less
■hidden by weeds or stones. A cursory survey showed that the basin was
honey-combed with burrows. In the loose talus of the slopes they extended
•directly down into the ground, turning aside here and there to avoid pieces
of rock, and ending, where further excavation had become impossible, in
a cavity about twice the diameter of the main burrow. Those in the more
level ground were often entirely concealed by wide spreading bushes which
had to be cut away before the entrance could be reached. Otherwise
these latter were easy of access, for the peaty, fibrous nature of the soil
rendered shallow burrows possible, and such were easily uncovered by
sliding the hand in and lifting up the top soil. The terminal chambers
were larger here than in the burrows among the rock fragments. Often
two burrows crossed or united, but alwa^rs the occupants were in sep-
.arate terminal cavities. The shortest burrow did not exceed twelve
inches in length, the first lifting up of the top disclosing a Socorro Petrel
and egg. The longest observed was in stoney ground, and zigzagged
about so that in all its windings it extended fully six feet. The nest
<:avities sometimes showed a sparse flooring of fine twigs and grass, but
just as often they were altogether bare of any lining. Most of the nests
•contained downy young, from newly hatched ones to individuals in which
the wing and tail feathers were more than half grown. The juvenals
were uniformly smoke gray in color not obviously different from corre-
sponding ages of the Leach Petrel. Perhaps some of these belonged to
2 2 Gkis^bja. Kiii}l>KGGKTT^ Birds of Coromados Islaitds \}uL
the Black Petrel, for an adult was never found in a burrow with a young
bird more than a day or two old. But in some sixteen of the burrows
there was an tggy in which case one of the parent birds was brooding,
either male or female, indifferently. The Socorro Petrels' eggs were
white, and either immaculatef or showing a faint ring of lavender and
cinnamon dots around the larger end. Nine examples average, in inches,
1. 20 X0.90, or, in millimeters, 30.5 X 23.
Among our skins of O. socorroensis are four which show more or less
white on the rump. One of these (J, No. 4331, Coll. F. S. D.) has the
lateral upper tail-coverts from base to tip pure white ;• so that the rump
may be described as white with a dusky median stripe. This specimen is
in this respect not distinguishable from some examples of O. lemcorhoa^
and in fact the only difference apparent to us is a scarcely perceptible
darker shade to the general plumage. Another specimen (No. 4333* Coll.
F. S. D.) has only the outer webs of the lateral rump feathers whitish.
Another (No. 5246, Coll. J. G.) has a still more restricted edging «/i
white; while one more (No. 4322, Coll. F. S. D.) has merely a trace of
pale edging. All the rest of our series of twenty-four specimens have the
rump uniform sooty brown- like the back. This variation toward the
white-rumped condition has been noted in this species before (Anthony,
Auk, XV. 1898, pp. 37, 38), and seems to be purely individual. Yet it may
reasonably serve to indicate probable recent origin from a widespread,
white-rumped ancestor like O. leucorhoa^ which O. socorroensis otherwise
approximates so closely. A comparison of specimens of O. socorroensis
with the fine series of O. homochroa in the California Academy of Sciences
collected by Leverett M. Loomis on the Farallones, shows the differences
between these two forms to be slight but constant, consisting in some-
what paler color and smaller size of the latter.
6. Sterna forsteri. Forster Tern. — Several were seen flying about
the launch while we were approaching and ^et some distance from South
Island.
7. Phalacrocorax auritus albociliatus. Farallone Cormorant. —
Several pairs were breeding on the south end of North Island. The nests
were built up quite substantially on rocks and bushes near the summit of
the ridge. Two nests contained two and three eggs respectively, while
several others had small young. This species builds separately from the
Brandt Cormorant, none of which were seen in company with the former.
8. Phalacrocorax penicillatus. Brandt Cormorant. — This was the
most abundant cormorant in the vicinity, and many had evidently nested
around the sides of North Island, where numerous empty fiests were noted.
9. PelecanuB califomicus. California Brown Pelican. — Large
numbers were always to be seen about the islands, either roosting on out-
lying rocks or going and coming in undulating lines from their feeding
grounds somewhere up the mainland coast. A big colony had bred on
North Island, for nests were numerous there at the south end. Most of
the young were full grown and able to fly, but a few were found still in a
Vol. XX
1903
J Grinnell and Daggett, Birds of Coronados Islands. ^'l
more or less helpless state. One nest contained two joung about half
grown. On being approached thej tumbled out precipitately, falling all
in a heap. Thej soon righted themselves, however, and regained their
wonted composure with a ludicrous expression of gravity.
ID. Heteractitis incanus. Wandering Tatler. — A lone individual
was observed on August 6, at the edge of the surf on Middle Island.
11. Actitis macularia. Spotted Sandpiper. — Two individuals were
seen on South Island on August 6. Thej were feeding along the rocks
at the water's edge.
12. Numenius hudsonicus. Hudsonian Curlew. — Two were noted
flying over South Island on August 7.
13. Arenaria melanocephala. Black Turnstone. — About a dozen
were seen about Middle Island on the rocks at the edge of the surf.
14. HsematopuB frazari. Frazar Oystercatcher. — One was seen on
North Island and another secured from Middle Island. This specimen is
a male in adult plumage and bears out well the characters assigned to this
form bv Mr. Brewster.
15. Haematopus bachmani. Black Oystercatcher. — Several pairs
of this species were seen about Middle and North Islands, all adults, but
from their anxious behavior we judged there must be young about. As
we approached the former island two Black and a Frazar Oystercatcher
came out circling together around our skiff with the usual loud cries.
16. Haliaeetus leucocephalus leucocephalus. Bald Eagle. — One was
seen at South Island. We were told that a pair had a nest there.
17. Palco anatum anatum. Duck Hawk. — Duck J Hawks were seen
flying over North and Middle Islands. On the highest ridge of the latter
were many remains of gulls for which we thought Duck Hawks might be
accountable. In several cases the skins of the victims were neatly turned
inside out over the head leaving the attached skeleton picked clean.
18. Corvus corax sinuatus. American Raven. — A raven was seen
flying over Middle Island, and another near the cove on South Island.
19. Salpinctes obsoletus. Rock Wren. — Rock Wrens were observed
on each of the three islands visited. They seemed to be most numerous
on North Island where they were seen skipping about among the nests in
the old pelican rookery, as well as along the stoney ridges. The specimens
secured are all in worn juvenal plumage, or else in the midst of the
annual moult. No differences are evident to distinguish these from main-
land examples.
20. Carpodacus dementis. San Clemente Holse Finch. — House
Finches were fairly common on South Island, and perhaps twenty were
seen on Middle Island. But on North Island only a single individual was
discovered, though the vegetation and general conditions on the three
islands appeared about the same. On Middle Island, on August 6, a nest
was found in a ledge of rock overhanging the petrel grounds. The for-
mation was a sort of conglomerate, showing many holes where smooth
cobble-stones had fallen out. In one of these natural cavities, ten feet
34 Grixnkll and Daggett, Birds ofCoronados Isimmds. Tjm^
above the base of the ledge and overhung by a projecting slab, was a
linnet's nest containing small young. The nest consisted of dry remains
of ice-plant amassed to fit the cavity, while the cup>shaped depression was
lined with gull feathers. The three young were only about one-third
grown, though poKsessed of lusty voices which served to indicate their
whereabouts. On the same island was a flock of linnets composed mostly
of full-grown juvenals. The specimens secured agree in differing decidedly
from the mainland form. They seem to be identical with the San Cle-
mente Island form, for they possess the bulky bill and heavy brown
streaking characteristic of clementis. An adult male taken on Middle
Island (Xo. 5236, Coll. J. G.) has the bill as large as the largest in an
extensive series from the Santa Barbara Islands.
21. Melospiza coronatorum. Coronados Song Sparrow. — We found
Song Sparrows on all of the three islands visited. On South Island
juvenals were seen along the path which leads back from the * hotel * at
the cove. On the Middle Island, where we found the petrel colony, an
old and weather-beaten nest was found under a bush. This contained a
faded but still identifiable egg-shell with contents dried. On North
Island Song Sparrows were fairly common, and here on August 7, we
obtained twelve specimens. As we landed, an individual was fearlessly
hopping close at hand among the boulders almost at the edge of the surf.
Most of the Song Sparrows, however, were seen higher up toward the
crest of the island, where they were haunting the sparse growth of shrubs
on the shaded northeast slope. We saw no trace of fresh water anywhere,
and the scanty vegetation presented anything but an inviting appearance.
Yet here we heard the familiar notes and full song of these birds which
on the mainland keep so close to verdant water courses and damp low-
lands. The Rock Wren, always a bird of the dryest localities, did not
seem out of place, but the Song Sparrow seemed altogether foreign to
such surroundings. Strange that the latter should accommodate itself to a
desert place like this, while truly dry-land birds like Ampkispixa^ Aimo-
phila, and Pipilo are absent altogether. Nevertheless here were the
plastic Song Sparrows, and our specimens show that this colony, isolated,
for we wish we knew how many decades, has not remained indifferent to
its unique environment. Certain constant characters are presented which,
though doubtless considered by some as * trivial,' seem to us significant,
and therefore entitle the form to a distinctive name.
Melospiza coronatorum, new specicK.
Spec. Char. — Most nearly resembling in coloration Afehspita cU-
menitg, and general size about the same, but tarsus decidedly shorter and
bill smaller ; differs from Melospiza cinerea coo/*rri oi the adjacent main-
land in much paler ground color, narrower streaking and smaller bill.
Type. — (f adult, No. 5232 Coll. J. G.; Loh Coronados Islands (North
Island), Lower California ; August 7. 1902.
^**J^^] Grikkbll and Daggbtt, Birds of Coronados Islands. ^5
Dbscriptiok of Type (in complete newly acquired adult annual
plumage). — Superciliary stripe conspicuously olive-gray, becoming pure
white in the supra loral region ; median crown stripe posteriorly drab-
gray, becoming white next to the culmen; lateral crown stripes burnt
umber ; the whole top of head between the superciliary stripes narrowly
streaked with black; postocular stripe burnt umber streaked with black;
rictal streak black mixed with burnt umber ; suborbital and loral regions
whitish flecked with black ; auriculars drab-gray ; malar stripe white
faintly tinged with cream-buft' posteriorly ; submalar streak black mixed
posteriorly with burnt umber ; chin and throat pure white, with a few
sooty feather-tips ; sides of neck drab-gray and hind neck drab, both
obscurely dusky streaked; ground color of back and rump broccoli brown ;
rump immaculate, but back and upper tail-coverts narrowly streaked with
black ; to be more explicit, an interscapular feather has a black shaft-
streak margined narrowly with hazel, the rest of the exposed feather
externally being drab ; breast and sides streaked with black, each exposed
feather bearing a cuneate shaft-streak margined on either side very
narrowly with hazel ; belly and anal region pure white ; flanks and
crissum pale clay color streaked with sooty brown ; tail sooty brown
externally edged with pale mars brown ; wing-coverts and quills centrally
sooty brown edged with pale mars brown, the coverts and secondaries
tipped with pale drab.
Mkasurements of Type. — Wing, 2.50; tail, 2.90; tarsus, .77 ; hind toe
and claw, .54 ; middle toe and claw, .80 ; bill from nostril, .34 ; culmen, .43 ;
depth of bill at base, .24.
Relationship. — A comparison of this with other members of the adap-
tive Melo$piza cinerea group shows it to be nearest the two California
insular forms, cUmenta and graminea. The coloration seems to be much
alike in the three cases; at present nothing can be safely stated on this
point, for all the material at hand from the Santa Barbara Islands is in worn
summer plumage (March to June). In general size corondtorum is nearer
clementce than graminea though with smaller bill and feet than either. It
is quite significant that the Coronodos Islands form should thus present
characters much more like those of the form on San Clemente Island,
seventy miles to the northwestward, than like those of the mainland race
twelve miles at most to the eastward. Coronatorum differs fiom M. c.
coofieri of the adjacent mainland in smaller bill, paler coloration and
much narrower streaking. The differences from the other California
races are still more conspicuous, so that further comparison may not be
drawn. The following measurements indicate the difference in propor-
tions between the three insular races. It must be kept in mind that the
specimens of clementa and graminea are in worn plumage, so that more
or less wearage (say 3 %) should be added to the wing and tail lengths
given. Most of the coronatorum skins are in complete new fall plumage.
The dimensions are given in inches, instead of millimeters, because most
of the published measurements of California Song Sparrows have been in
inches.
36 Grinnell and Daggett, Birds of Coronado% Islands. F
Auk
Jan.
M. coroKotufH
Wing.
TaU.
Tarsus.
Hind toe
and claw.
BiUfrom
nostril.
Culmen.
5232
Coll. J. G.
cT ad. an.
2.50
2.90
•77
•43
5»3«
1 1 14
cf " "
2-53
2.90
•77
•44
522Q
1 i II
cf ist an.
a. 50
2.75
•75
•43
5228
ii l<
■ II II
moulting
.67
.40
5230
a 1*
9 ad. an.
*-3«
2.67
.80
!6o
.4«
5233
II 1 <
9 juv.
2-33
2-57
:a
•41
5362
Coll.F.S.D.
cf
2.38
a.72
•40
5370
4 4 11
^
2.50
2.90
.80
.42
5365
It 41
9
2.35 ,
2.71
.68
•44
5372
41 II
9 juv.
moulting
•77
•42
5396
II II
Q <<
a.42
2.72
•77
•40
5416
II II
•
a.23
2.52
.7a
.40
M. graminea
Av. 7 ad. ff($
Av. 3 ad. 9 9
2.39
2.30
a 53
2.50
•83
•79
.47
•44
Av. 3 juvs.
2.41
2.50
.84
•42
^f. cUmenta
Av. 10 ad. cf cf
a-53
a.78
.88
.46
Av. 3 ad. 9 9
2.40
a.64
•84
.45
Av. 3 juvs.
2.49
a-75
•84
•59
.44
Bibliography.
1877. Streets, T. H. Contributions to the Natural History of the
Hawaiian and Fanning Islands and Lower California. "=■ Bull. No. 7, U.
S. N. M., 1877. Ornithology, pp. 9-33.
Zonotrichia leucophrys intermedia (= Z. I. gamheli) recorded (p. 11}
from Los Coronados Islands without comment. This species and a few
others may be expected to regularly visit the islands in winter.
1883. Belding, L. Catalogue of a collection of Birds made at Various
Points along the Western Coast of Lower California, North of Cape St.
Eugenio. [Edited by R. Ridgway.] •< Proc. U. S. N. M., V, March 21^
1883, pp. 527-S32-
On pages 528 to 529 occurs a brief description of Los Coronados
Islands, where "a few birds only were taken .... the more important of
which are the following": Phalacrocorax penicillatus^ Hamatopus pal-
liatus (= H. frazari) and Ilasmatopus niger (= //. backmani)\ only
these three are mentioned.
1888. Brewster, W. Descriptions of supposed New Birds from Lower
California, Sonora and Chihuahua, Mexico and the Bahamas. -^ Auk,
V, January, 1888, pp. 82-95.
Hirmatopus frazari, p. 84, new species; type from Carmen Island, Gulf
of California. Bclding's Coronado specimen critica4Iy mentioned.
1889. Bryant, W. E. A Catalogue of the Birds of Lower California,
Mexico. •< Proc. Cal. Ac Sc, 2nd Ser. II, I)eceml)er 17, 1889, pp. 237-
320.
PelecttuMs californicHs recorded as nesting on Los Coronados Islands ;
also mention of the three species found by Belding.
1898. Anthony, A. \V. Petrels of Southern California. •< Auk, W\
April, 1898, pp. 140-144.
Describes nesting of Oceanodroma melauia and O. socorroensis on Lo»
Coronados Islands.
^ toM ^1 Grinnell AMD Daggstt, Birds of Coronados Islands, 3 7
Z899. McGrsgor, R. C. Notes on California Song Sparrows. < Bull.
Coop. Orn. Club, I, September, 1899, pp. 87, 88.
Song Sparrow recorded from Los Coronados Islands, and referred to
Mtlospixa meladia clemtMtig (= Melosfita coronatorum),
1899. Anthony, A. W. A Night at Sea. < Bull. Coop. Orn. Club,
I, November, 1899, pp. loi, 102.
Popular account of the birds seen while rowing out to the Islands.
1901. RiDGWAY, R. The Birds of North and Middle America [etc.].
= Bull. No. 50, U. S. N. M., 190 1.
Song Sparrow of Los Coronados Islands referred (p. 88) to Melosfiiza
cinerea clement €B (= Melospiza coronatorum).
190a. Brewster, W. Birds of the Cape Region of Lower California.
<< Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, September, 1902, pp. 1-243, map.
Several of the previously recorded birds are quoted as from "the
Coronado Islands," though these are erroneously stated to be "in the
Culf of California."
Summary.
Twenty-two species of birds are known from Los Coronados
Islands. Fifteen of these are indigenous, while seven are visitants
which breed elsewhere. Only six native land birds have been
found, of which the Bald Eagle, Raven, and Duck Hawk are birds
of long flight and general distribution. Two of the remaining
three are different in certain recognizable features from their
relatives oh the adjacent mainland ten miles distant, being most
like those on San Clemente Island, six times as far away in
another direction. The non-indigenous species are all of wide
distribution along the Pacific coast of North America.
Indigenous Species. Non-indigenous Species.
PtychoramphuR aleuticus. Larus heermanni.
Larus occidentalis. Sterna forsteri.
Oceanodroma melania. Heteractitis incanus.
Oceanodroma socorroensis. Actitis macularia.
Phalacrocorax auritus albociliatus. Numenius hudsonicus.
Phalacrocorax penicillatus. Arenaria melanocephala.
Pelecanus californicus. Zonotrichia leucophrys gambeli.
Hsematopus frazari.
Haematopus bachmani.
Haliseetus leucocephalus.
Falco anatum.
Corvus corax sinuatus.
Carpodacus dementis.
Melospiza coronatorum.
Salpinctes obsoletus.
2 8 DoRAN, Vernacular Names of Birds. [jml
THE VERNACULAR NAMES OF BIRDS.
BY EDWIN W. DORAN, PH. D.
Both the general public and professional ornithologists con-
stantly make use of the vernacular names of birds. This statement
is also true of nearly all forms of animal life which are of any
economic importance. In fact, vernacular names are perhaps
more often employed even by scientists than formerly, and the
subject is one of growing importance.
Since this is true, it is important, first, that these vernacular
names be correct, that is, formed in accordance with some
established principles of construction; and, secondly, that the
same name be always applied to a particular species. Though
there will generally be several names in use for our commoner
animals, especially our game-birds, the same name ought not to be
applied indiscriminately to several different birds, as is often done.
There ought to be some means of knowing also just what animal
is designated by any particular vernacular name : or there ought
to be in convenient form for reference a list of all the commoner
names applied to any particular species. The whole subject of
vernacular names ought to be put upon a scientific basis.
These considerations have led the writer to undertake* the
preparation of a work which shall give (i) the vernacular name
of every bird found in North America, written in correct form,
with special reference to the proper compounding of names ; * and
(2) a synonymy of all the vernacular names, with the most
common, or most suitable one indicated. This is intended to
secure uniformity in writing the common, or popular, names,
especially as to the correct compounding of the words; and also
to secure, as far as possible, the adoption of a single suitable
name for each bird, or at most a limited number of well-selected
names. Many birds, especially game-birds, have from ^\t. to
twenty names, some even more than fifty names. This multiplicity
of names produces great confusion.
* The author has prepared also a work on * The Compound Vernacular
Names of Insects.' See article in * Entomological News ' for Nov., 1902.
Vol. XX
1909
J DoRAN, Vernacular Nam€» of Birds, IQ
The importance of this subject is manifest to all. One of the
most noted ornithologists in this country recentlyin a private
letter to the writer said : " It is a subject which has been much
neglected, and I am glad you are taking it up. The matter of
compound names has given me not a little bother, and the question
of hyphens still more." If the subject has given trouble to men of
the highest rank, certainly younger and less skillful workers will
find still more trouble.
There is not only a great lack of uniformity in writing the
compound vernacular names of birds ; but, with regard to many
names, a majority of the ornithologists seem to have selected in-
correct forms. This statement may seem paradoxical, as correct
form in s|>eech is determined generally by the majority of the best
speakers and writers. However, that does not necessarily mean
a majority of the best ornithologists, or best entomologists, but a
majority of those who give attention to the selection of correct
forms of s|>eech in accordance with certain underlying language-
principles.
The design of this paper is to get at the source of not a few
incorrect forms by calling attention to what seems clearly a mis-
application, or lack of application, of language-principles in many
vernacular names in the A. O. U. * Check-List of North American
Birds.' There are about one hundred seventy-five of these names
which are manifestly incorrect in form. As this * Check-List ' is
the standard for all ornithologists, even in regard to vernacular
names, that seems the proper place to begin, though the writer is
not unmindful of the great array of ornithological talent he is
controverting at the outset.
It is necessary to lay down certain fixed principles and to form-
ulate certain rules as a standard with which to compare these
forms which appear to be wrong. The rules given below do not
necessarily govern in the formation of all vernacular names of
birds, as it seems best to leave the full discussion of the subject
to another paper, which will appear later. These are intended to
apply especially to the selections from the * Check-List ' which
follow ; but they are sufficient for all names of the same nature.
The * Standard Dictionary,' in the Introduction, lays down three
general principles for compounding English words. The second,
the only one needed for the present purpose, is as follows :
^.O DoRAN, Veruacnlar Names of Birds, L U?.
" That abnormal association of words generally indicates unifi-
cation of sense, and hence compounding in form."
In accordance with \\i\s principle I have formulated the following
Rules for Compounding Vernacular Names of Birds,
Write as a compound word: —
1. A general name, used with any other name prefixed for specification
and denoting food or prev (cherry-bird, 8parrow-hjyw*k ) ;
2. A general name used with any other name prefixed for specification
denoting, —
a. similarity (quail-dove) ;
b. habit (butcher-bir.d) ;
c. characteristic (song-sparrow) ;
d. habitat (house-sparrow).
3. Any two or more names or words in joint arbitrary use (road-runner,
turnstone).
4. A phrase consisting of an adjective and a noun, together used as a
mere name : generally written without the hyphen (redpoll, yellowlegs,
goldeneye).
For additional information on these various word-forms and
the underlying principles, see * The Compounding of English
Words,' by F. Horace Teall. The literature on this subject is
very meager.
I have selected from the * Check-List ' representatives of the
various incorrect forms, giving also the corresponding numbers in
a column at the left. At the right is given a reference to the
foregoing rule which governs each case. In some cases two or
three rules apply. Many words are followed by "etc." to indicate
that several other words of the same group are compounded in
accordance with the same rule; for example, all the different
kinds of screech-owl, humming-bird, song-sparrow, etc.
List of Names.
«5
rhinoceros-auklel
2a
29
pigeon-guillemot
2a
39
ivory-gull
2a
51
herring-gull. etc.
I
56
mew-gull
2C
113.1
red-tailed tropic-bird
3
»44
wood-duck
2d
DoRAK, Vtrm»cular Namti »f Birdi.
•47
onvai-lMck
m8
lF<«r -cuuiwlock.etc
"5"
American goldene^, etc
i6i
king-etder
1&4
^e^"t-BCDtcr
166
turf-KOter
169
le««er •now gooM. etc.
Ijl.l
be>n-«ooM
"7S
i™.t,.idc-Koo,e,etc.
■ 76
cmpiTOr-Roo-e
iSS
Ml
bl:.tW trrjwncd night-heron
106
und-hlll crane
i)8
king-rail
]il
clapper-nil, etc.,
J 17
corn-crake
'33
.lilt-.>ni.Jpipcr
>44
»«
green (hank
^SS
jrcllowlegi, etc.
»7S
181
n„„,rH„ir [.lever
1%%
•urf-bird
)9J
mounliin partridge
194a
»>llrv.pamidgc
'98-
lJl>Iatkl^«pl'uc^■{^OuW, etc
30'
willowplarmlBan. etc.
30s
prairie-hen. etc.
J09
uRc-grouce
J"S
i.s.«n«tr pigeon
3)o
Kr.mM.I-ii..vt
zn
^Jlkfl MllUlIC
330
>^trubji--kite
33'
marth-hawk
337b
Satnt Lucas redUii
3*0
harp.T-eagle
3"
jrrnv ««<agle
3S^
pmlrie-ialcon
jsfi
duck-ha-k.elc
365
American 1..M1-OW1
373
• erect li -"Ml, elc
377
hawk^wl. etc.
381
eU-owl
3»
4'7
whlppoorwill. etc.
410
night-hawk, etc.
42 DoRAN, Vernacular Names of Birds, xjSi
4^3
chimney-swift
2d
428
ruby-throated humming-bird, etc.
3» 2C
444
king-bird, etc.
2a
461
wood- pc wee, etc.
2d
490
fish-crow
la
498c
Florida redwing
4
501
meadow-lark, etc.
2d
506
orchard-oriole
2d
5»5
pine-grosbeak, etc.
2d
519
house-finch, etc.
2d
533
pine-siskin
2d
540
vesper-sparrow
2b
543
lagoon-sparrow, etc.
2d
546
grasshopper-sparrow, etc.
2a
552a
western lark-sparrow
2a
559
tree-sparrow, etc.
2d
581
song-sparrow, etc.
2C
584
swamp-sparrow
2d
585
fo<-sparrow
2a
598
indigo-bunting
2a
604
dick-cissel
3
605
lark-bunting
2a
612
cliff-s wallow, etc.
2d
613
barn-swallow, etc.
2d
619
cedar-waxwing
2d
635
Bahama honey-creeper
la
636
black-and-white warbler
3
653
mangrove-warbler, etc.
lb
669
hermit-warbler
2C, 2a
681
Maryland ycllowthroat, etc.
4
698
meadow-pipit
2d
702
sage-thrasher
2d
703
mocking-bird
2C
713
cactus-wren
2d
717a
cafion-wren
2d
7H
short-billed marsh-wren, etc.
3i 2d
738
mountain-chickadee
2d
759
dwarf hermit-thrush, etc.
2a, 2C
768
mountain-bluebird
2d, 4
^^I'w^J Brown, Arizona Bird Note*, 43
ARIZONA BIRD NOTES.
BY HERBERT BROWN.
My EXPERIENCE with the Elf Owl {Micropaiius whitneyi) is that
during the spring and summer months they home almost wholly
in holes made by woodpeckers in the sahuara, or giant cactus.
Although so common to the hills and plains of Arizona this cactus
does not grow in the immediate vicinity of Yuma. It is, however,
plentiful about twenty miles above on the Colorado, in the great
washes that slash the mesas at right angles with the river, and
along the river bottom bordering the foothills. By comparison
with those growing in central and southeastern Arizona these
cactus are small, seldom averaging more than thirty feet in height.
Nearly all contain woodpecker holes, many of which appear at
some time to have been used. They must have been made over
a long series of years, or at a time when bird life was more
plentiful than now, as not one in fifty have occupants of any kind.
During my last two visits to that section I worked the cactus over a
large scope of countr)' and was surprised at the poverty of bird life.
May 18, 1902, by the aid of a 21-foot ladder, I climbed my first
cactus on the Colorado. It was a prolific tree. In one hole I
found an Elf Owl sitting on three partially incubated eggs. In
another hole I found her mate, and in still another five young
woodpeckers {Centurus uropygialis). As this cactus had been so
fruitful I very naturally expected to find many others equally so,
but did not. I returned everything to their nests. For seven
hours four men worked the big ladder on every promising cactus
within a radius of several miles, but we found only three additional
owls, one of which played * possum ' and escaped ; the other two I
brought home with me. Both were females, as with one I took
three partially incubated eggs, and a fresh egg was found in the
box on my return home.
This trip was made wholly for the purpose of satisfying myself as
to the presence of the Elf Owl on the Colorado. We were twenty-
one hours in making it, as the sun was intensely hot and the road
both heavy and rough. Although the object sought had been
accomplished I was not very well satisfied with results. A week
44 Brown, Arizona Bird Notts, [j^^
later we tried it a second time, under more favorable conditions,
as we were but a little more than fifteen hours making it. It
differed scarcely from the first in the way of Elf Owls, as but four
were taken during the day, and with them two sets of eggs, one of
three and one of four. Both sets were partially incubated, but
less so than those on the preceding week. With one exception
the birds were taken from cactus growing in or close to the edge
of the valley.
I expected to have met with some form of Screech Owl, but
found no sign of them whatever. I found two partially, built nests
of the Ash-throated Flycatcher {Myiarchus cinerascens)^ and five
nests of young Gila Woodpeckers {Centurus uropygialis)^ and one
of Swainson's Hawk i^Buteo swainsoni). These, with the owls,
represent nearly loo miles of travel and the work of four men for
two days, with the thermometer well up to 150 degrees in the sun.
I merely mention these things to illustrate the hard work a bird
man bumps against on the Lower Colorado. The young wood-
peckers were of all sizes and conditions of feather. In one nest,
containing three very young birds, I found a fresh egg. The
hawk's nest contained two young birds. They left the nest as we
approached it, but struck the ground less than fifty feet away.
They were a beautiful pair, and encouraged by their screaming
parents were full of fight, but by a little maneuvering I managed
to get them to the scant shade of a paloverde tree where I left
them. The nest was a bulky affair, made of sticks and padded
with dead bark. It was built against the body of a cactus and
was supported by a pair of curving arms. The partially consumed
bodies of a wood rat and a large lizard were on the nest.
I found many bats in the cactus, sometimes a dozen or more in
a single hole. They were all of the pale form of Vespertilio fuscus^
ugly little rascals to put one's hand among. In one cactus I un-
covered a whole colony. Every hole chopped into, and there
were at least ten of them, swarmed with bats. Finally but one
remained to be examined ; as it was rather awkwardly situated I
was inclined to leave it, and in doing so stated to my companions
that owls were too cleanly to associate with such dirty neighbors.
I did, however, cut it open and, to my surprise, I found an owl.
If it was a case of convenient larder the nest contained no evidence
^^»v5*] Brown, Arizona Bird Notes. 4 c;
of it. I might here add that I have never seen unused food in
the nest of an Elf Owl, but with Screech Owls such things have
been of common occurrence.
I have been more or less familiar with the Elf Owl for the past
eighteen years and am, or should be, fairly well acquainted with
them. In one day I took over thirty adults, and turned everyone
of them loose. In the matter of plumage I never found but one
out of the ordinary. It had a black eye disk and black eye.
When handled, they are, apparently, as inoffensive as a canary,
and will feign death when first taken in the hand, but that it is
fully conscious of its surroundings is evidenced by its quick dart
for liberty the moment the grip of the hand is relaxed. I once
thought that this semblance of death was due to paralytic fear,
but after losing a number of birds I came to believe it a wise
provbion for its preservation. Have often tried the experiment
and the little fellows never failed to take advantage of it. Occa-
sionally two, male and female, are taken from the same hole. On
the Santa Cruz I saw an owl taken from its nest which contained
three of its own and two eggs of the Gila \Voodp>ecker. As it was
in possession, it had, undoubtedly, driven away the original
occupant. All the eggs were fresh.
For years I was of the belief that adult birds could not be kept
alive in confinement. With an abundance of fresh meat before them
they would, if i>ermitted, deliberately starve to death. An exami-
nation of their stomachs disclosed their food to be largely insects.
A small black ant and numerous beetles are, apparently, their
princip.il food. With this knowledge 1 had no trouble in keeping
them alive indefinitely. The six taken up the river enjoyed the
best of heahh during the weeks I kept I hem here. Two were
sent to I^s .Angeles and died shortly after reaching their (itsliiia-
lion ; the other four were sent to New York and died in transit.
Their daily food consisted of crickets, grasshoppers, li/ards, small
birds and mice. Years ago, before I knew how to properly feed
adults. I raised five. When first taken they had been hatched
only a few days, but they did well and eventually ^rew into hand-
some birds. If I remember rightly 1 sent them to the Zo()logical
Gardens at Philadelphia, but do not know how they fared after-
wards.
a6 Brown, Arizona Bird Notes. LJm!
Outside of the river bottom there is really but little bird life on
the Colorado. The rainfall, sometimes, does not exceed a half
inch a year. The valley is densely brushed and heavily wooded
along the sloughs and banks, but the dead hills give no sign of
vegetable life. From twenty to fifty miles above Yuma is a great
basin hedged in by detached volcanic mountains. At one time
they were covered with pine timber, but are now baked and bare.
The wood has become silicified, is hard as adamant and heavy as
iron. I have been told by vaqueros familiar with that country,
that an occasional tree can still be seen standing, but it has not
been my good fortune to see one although 1 have been five times
through the section where they are supposed to be. In the
washes, some of which are a mile wide, giant cactus, paloverde,
and ironwood make up almost the sum total of vegetation. In
May the ironwood (Olneya iesota Gray) was covered by dense
masses of purple bloom and presented a delightful contrast to the
black and brown of the overshadowing hills.
Next year I hope to define the western boundary of the Ellf Owl
on the California side of the Colorado River.
Red-winged, Yellow-headed and Brewer's Blackbirds, and the
Dwarf Cowbird, are the most common of all winter residents in
the neighborhood of Yuma, Arizona. Redwings scatter up and
down the Colorado and Gila River bottoms and can be found
nesting throughout the summer. The Yellowheads and Brewer's
go north in the spring and are not again seen till the fall migra-
tion has set in. Cowbirds are gregarious the year through.
During the summer months, when all respectable birds are paired
and nesting, these little black and brown midgets can be seen
fifty in a flock, and the work of the pestiferous female is apparent
in the nests of nearly all small birds found hereabouts. In the
winter they skirmish for food in the town by the hundreds. They
are audacious little scamps and are ever ready to take chances
with the boldest of blackbirds, and some of the latter will almost
suffer themselves to be driven over before they will get out of the
way.
That Cowbirds are a recognized nuisance in evidenced by the
determination of their afflicted neighbors to rid themselves of
honors thrust upon them. Last summer my attention was called
^*^T Brown, Arizona Bird Notes. 47
to the three-story nest of a Sonora* Yellow Warbler and its efforts
not to raise a brood of bastards. The first or lower nest con-
tahied one cowbird tgg and one warbler ^ggy the second two cow-
bird eggs and several broken shells of the warbler, the third con-
tained- one egg of each bird and had been abandoned. Between
the first and second lot of eggs the nest had been thickly padded ;
between the second and third lots the padding was not so thick,
but was sufficient to thoroughly cover the objectionable eggs. I
have seen numerous nests of small birds, most of which contained
one or more eggs of the Cowbird. Double nests are quite com-
mon, the Cowbird eggs being entirely padded over. One of these
double nests was that of a Sonora Yellow Warbler. It was a
beautiful thing. The lower nest contained three fresh eggs of the
mother bird and one Cowbird egg, the upper one three legitimate
«ggs. Occasionally, but not often, I have found Cowbird eggs in
the nests of larger birds than themselves, notably in those of
Abert's Pipilo, but the predisposition is in favor of the nests of
vireos, warblers and small flycatchers. This is carried on to such
an extent on the lower Gila that it is almost impossible to find a
nest of any of the foregoing birds that does not contain one or
more of the eggs or young of the Cowbird. To my knowledge
more than one hundred eggs of this parasite were taken from
nests and destroyed during the past season.
Blackbirds announce their arrival here not later than October
first, sometimes a week or two earlier, and from thence on they
drift along towards the latter part of the month. Young birds
have come in as late as October 20. Their short tails and persist-
ent demands on the other birds for food precluded any mistake
as to their age. The Redwings and Brewer's make themselves
at home wherever they can get food, but the Yellowheads go
lower down the valley and have a fondness for working over
refuse in stock corrals, straw stacks and wheat fields. The spring
migration commences by the middle of April and by the end of
the month nearly all are gone. These dates will hold about good
for the average year, but 1892 was different from anything I had
heretofore seen. The birds did not get away for a month later.
Small bunches of Redwings nest in the willows and arrow weeds
on the Gila and make odd visits to their old feeding grounds dur-
48 Brown, Arizona Bird Notes. Lja*"
ing the early summer, but eventually they disappear and are not
again seen till they become due in the fall. During the winter
months Redwings, Brewer's and Cowbirds make common cause
in the streets and yards of this town. Once in a while an odd
Yellowhead can be seen among them, but, as a rule, they flock alone.
Abert's Pipilo is the most common of all pipilos to be found on
the Colorado and lower Gila. They are gregarious during the
early winter months and, 1 believe, they go no further south as
they are to be found here the year through. I have repeatedly
seen large numbers of them together, scratching in the earth and
sunning themselves like a lot of quail. May 3, 1900,1 found a
nest containing five eggs. That is my earliest record for the year,
and the only nest I ever saw with five eggs. On July 14, of that
year I saw young birds still in the nests. During 1901 I made no
record, but for 1902 I made the most complete one ever made in
this section of the country. June 12 I found the first nest of this
pipilo, it contained three fresh eggs, and on August 3 the last one.
It also contained three eggs. As you will observe, there is a
difference of a month and nine days between the nesting seasons
of 1900 and 1902, and the difference of fully a month in the
closing. The young birds seen July 14 were eight or ten days
old, and the eggs taken August 3 were fresh. I have no reason
to offer for this great difference. There can be no mistake in the
matter for the reason that on each of the years named I had a
responsible man in the brush with a note book and his sole busi-
ness was to watch the birds. I am almost certain that two broods
of young are raised a year. The nest of this pipilo is somewhat
bulky, is loosely made and loosely placed in any convenient fork
of tree or bush. The favorite nesting material, hereabouts, is the
inside bark of willow and cotton wood. It is torn off in strips^
about one quarter of an inch wide, of var)'ing lengths. An
average sized nest is six inches in diameter, outside measurement,
and four inches deep, three inches in diameter and two and a half
inches deep, inside measurement. It is lined with fibrous roots,
shredded bark, hair, grass or other convenient material. During
their summer molt the birds are ragged and disreputable in
appearance.
The American White Pelican {Pelecanus erythrorhynchos^ has a
^*?w ^J Brown, Arixona Bird Notes, 49
playground between here and the Gulf. During the early spring
months of 1901 they passed up the river by thousands, but during
the spring of 1902 they were much less in evidence. February
28, 1 90 1, they went into camp a few miles above here. To that
time I did not think it was possible to see so many pelicans
together. They occupied a wide sweep of sand, left by an over-
flow of the Colorado and, at a distance, resembled great banks of
snow. They remained, hereabouts, coming and going, to May
first, when they suddenly disappeared and were not again seen
till September 17. Those seen during the late spring went
directly up the river.
The Little Green Herons {Butorides virescens) generally reach
here by the middle of April, and by the end of the month they
are common both up and down the river. By the middle of June
the nesting season is apparently at its best. The nest is a rude
platform of twigs, or small sticks, through which the eggs can
be seen from below. When possible they are built above the
water and generally in the fork of a small tree. I saw one nest-
ing within the town limits of Tucson, but it was the only one of
the kind I ever saw in that neighborhood.
On the night of December 15, 1899, there was a heavy fall of
rain accompanied by continuous gusts of wind. On the morn-
ing following the surface of the river was dotted with numerous
bunches of ducks and Pied-billed Grebes. Men and boys shot
at everything afloat from both sides of the river, while such as
could did their butchering from boats. Both ducks and grebes
were confused, and although kept much on the wing, could not be
driven away. The Southern Pacific railroad bridge crosses the
river directly opposite the town, and, queerly enough, below this
bridge the birds would not go. A ferry cable, stretched across the
river about 300 yards above the bridge, was a dead line to many
ducks, but the grebes were sharper eyed and never collided with
it. I was told that six ducks were killed at one time by strik-
ing against it. Out of a flock of about a dozen I saw four killed
in that manner, two as they flew up the stream and two more as
they circled and went down. The feathers would be knocked off
in great bunches and they would fall to the water like pieces of
lead. But it was of the grebes I wished to write and not of
^O Braislin, Note$ oh Long Island Birds, \^i
ducks. They were shot at without mercy, decency or common
sense, and although it was tails up at the flash of a gun they
were eventually tired down and killed off. The only redeeming
feature to the slaughter, if t-here could be one, was that the Mexi-
cans and Indians used them for food. I estimated one bunch to
be 30 feet in diameter, and there were numerous small bunches
scattered up the river for at least a quarter of a mile. Since that
time I have not seen a half dozen on the river. They can, how-
ever, be met with at any time during the year at a laguna of
brackish water about fourteen miles above here, where they prob-
ably nest. I hope to be able to determine that this spring. The
Western Grebes, in limited numbers, are also permanent residents
of the laguna. A few occasionally straggle lower down, but not
often.
NOTES CONCERNING CERTAIN BIRDS OF
LONG ISLAND, N. Y.
BY WILLIAM c:. BRAISLIN, M. D.
The following data for the most part relate to recent occurrences
of species more or less rare or uncommon on Long Island. One
species or hybrid {^Hclminthophila lawrcncd) is here for the first
time recorded from Long Island. The note concerning another
species {Larus minutus) has to do with the occurrence of this
bird in North America, as well as on Long Island, for the second
time.
Fratercula arctica. A specimen of the Puffin was sent me
from Montauk by Mr. Arthur Miller, with a request that it might
be identified and its name furnished. The sender stated that but
for its poor state of plumage, he should have kept the bird for
mounting, as it was to him an ornithological curiosity. It was
found on the beach, March 30, 1902. The state of plumage
which rendered it an imperfect specimen for mounting rather
added to its interest as a * skin.' since it was due to moult. Its
^*i«J^] Braislin, Notes an Long Island Birds, J I
flight feathers are lacking, the new quills, although sprouting,
being as yet rudimentary and entirely incapable of supporting it
in the air. The feathers of the breast are largely wanting, leaving
the skin well protected, however, by the abundant dark-colored
down. Its comparatively helpless condition was doubtless re-
sponsible for its having been driven ashore, where it perished in
the surf.
Uria loinvia. Brunnich's Murres occurred on the Long Island
coast during the winter of 1901-02. Four were obtained from
various localities. On Dec. 6, 190 1, a female was killed at Sag
Harbor on a fresh-water pond. It came into the possession of
Mr. Ivan C. Byram a taxidermist of that village, who sent it to me
in the flesh. Mr. Robt. R. Peavey of Brooklyn shot one at Rock-
away Beach on Dec. 26, and kindly presented it to me. A
member of the crew of the Amagansett Life-saving Station, George
H. Mulford, found one on the beach, dead, at that place Dec. 30,
1901, and another on March 2, 1902. The last is rather remark-
able as a Long Island specimen of the species, in that the feather
coloration approaches nearly, if not quite, the full nuptial plumage.
The feathers of the chin, sides of the throat and neck are of the
dark, sooty color seen in adults collected at their breeding stations.
No other skin which I have seen from Long Island has the dark
coloring so much developed. This may be attributed to the date
of occurrence, which is a late one for the species in this latitude.
The bill of this bird is larger than our usual specimens, its depth,
in fact, somewhat exceeding the limit for (/. lomvia as indicated in
Chapman 's * Birds of Eastern North America.'
Alca torda. An immature Jlazor-billed Auk was sent me by
Capt. James G. Scott, keeper of the Montauk Point Light, on
Nov. 14, 1901. In regard to it he wrote: "The bird I sent you
was brought to me by a fisherman, and I think he found it on the
beach, for I have found them dead on the beach."
Alle alle. Two little Auks were found by the same member
of the Amagansett Life-saving crew referred to above, while
patrolling the beach on the evening of December 14, 1901. He
wrote me that he had so obtained them and added: "The sea
was running very high and I suppose that they where washed in
on the beach."
g 2 Braislin, Notes on Long Island Birds, Fj^
Larus minutus. The occurrence of the Little Gull in North
America was regarded with doubt by ornithologists, owing to
the absence of any satisfactory evidence, until the absolute record
in this journal by Mr. William Dutcher, concerning its occurrence
at Fire Island, Long Island, New York, in September 1887 (Auk,
Vol. V, 1888, p. 171). After a comparatively short interval the
bird has been again taken on Long Island and the record of its
occurrence here constitutes the second instance for North America.
Mr. Robt. L. Peavey of Brooklyn was fortunate in securing this
specimen of Larus minutus^ which was in company with a fiock
of Bonaparte's Gulls, some of which were also secured, at Rock-
away Beach, May 10, 1902. This rare specimen Mr. Peavey has
generously donated to the Museum of the Brooklyn Institute of
Arts and Sciences. The plumage is that of the immature bird,
just taking on that of the adult. Evidences of the latter are
present on the forehead and at the base of the upper mandible
which parts are nearly completely clothed in new, black feathers ;
on the chin at either side a few new, black feathers appear, as
also over the eyes and a very few on the crown. Sex, 9 (deter-
mined by Mr. George K. Cherrie, Curator of the Department).
Culmen, 90 in.; wing, 8.20 in.
Anser albifrons gambeli. At Sag Harbor I recently had the
opportunity of examining the collection of mounted birds of Mr.
I. C. Byram, a taxidermist residing there. Among other birds of
interest was a fine sp>ecimen of the White-fronted Goose. Con-
cerning it he subsequently wrote as follows : " I have looked up
the date of the goose, and find that I killed it Oct. 18, 1889. ^^
was feeding in a fresh-water pond near here. My dog started it
out of the water and it flew over my head and I killed it."
Olor columbianus. A Whistling Swan was killed at Flat-
lands, a village within the boundaries of Greater New York, by
Asher White, a farmer living there, on Dec. 24, 1901. He had
the bird mounted and I recently examined the specimen at his
house on Mill Lane. I was informed that the bird had been
killed on Flat Creek, one of the tide-water channels emptying into
that portion of Jamaica Bay known locally as Platlands Bay.
The father and grandfather of the White who shot the swan, and
who also lived here, on occasion * gunned' for the market, but
^*iuoc« T Braislin, Notes on Long Island Birds, c^
never met this species. On the day on which he made this
capture he had gone to this creek for water-fowl, where tall grass
formed a natural blind. The swan was first seen in flight and
took to the water not far off, but out of gun-range. After long
waiting, however, it swam within range when the farmer killed it
by a heavy charge of shot, with which he was fortunate enough
to break the neck of the immense bird.
Accipiter atricapillus. Mr. Byram of Sag Harbor has in his
collection of birds a fine adult Goshawk. It was killed at Ama-
gansett March 21, 1899, and mounted by him. He states in
regard to this species : " I also had another to stuff, March i ,
1899, which was caught in a trap on Gardiner's Island."
Cathartes aura. Mr. Robt. L. Peavey, of this city, secured a
specimen of the Turkey Vulture at Rockaway Beach, June 21,
1902. A former specimen secured by him at the same place, three
years previously, I have recorded in this journal (Auk, XVII,
1900, p. 70). /
Helminthophila lawrencei. At Cold Spring Harbor, Long
Island, May 8, 1902, a specimen of Lawrence's Warbler was
secured. Nothing except its peculiar coloring was noted as dis-
tinguishing it from numbers of other warblers feeding in the same
trees with it. The specimen is a male, and seems perfectly
typical. This is the first recorded instance of its occurrence on
Long Island.
Mimus polyglottos. A Mockingbird, in immature (breast-
spotted) plumage was killed on Rockaway Beach Sept. 14, 1902,
and kindly presented to the writer by Mr. Robt. L. Peavey of
Brooklyn. Another was reported killed here two weeks previously.
54 Harvey, Diary of a CardimaFs Nest, [^^
THE DIARY OF A CARDINAL'S NEST.
BY GERTRUDE FAY HARVEY.
piau /.;
The Cardinal (Cardinalts cardinalis) is a common bird here
in southwestern Ohio, and is with us throughout the year. There
is one pair which seems never to leave our neighborhood nor to
separate, staying together the year round. Every winter we feed
these birds to keep them from want, and every summer we con-
tinue to feed them because we hate to stop.
For three years they have built in our garden, the successful
nests being in a heavy honeysuckle vine at a little distance from
the house. Twice they built the nest close to the porch, but both
times they deserted it before the eggs were laid. So, when the
birds made a tour of inspection in the conservatory this spring,
we had little hope of their settling in so conspicuous a place, or,
at least, of their staying to raise their young. The Cardinal has
the reputation of deserting his nest for slight reasons.
The Cardinals were first seen in the conservatory on the 13th
of April, having entered by an open ventilator in the roof, as all
the other windows were closed at that season. Birds often come
by accident into the greenhouse, but usually when once inside
they make wild efforts to get out, dashing against the glass and
flying frantically about. The Cardinals seemed to have come in
deliberately, and they showed their superior intelligence by the
manner in which they grasped the situation. Walls of glass did
not delude them in the least. When their insp>cction was finished
they calmly departed by the little opening through which they had
come in.
The next day they came again, and a few days later were
noticed to have twigs in their beaks, as though planning a nest
Oh the 20th of April they selected the site — a fork in a Marechal
Neil rose vine, and they began to bring in a great amount of
material, which did not take definite shape until the '26th.
Throughout the process of building the female gathered the
material and did all the work, tht* male keeping close at her side,
^*w^] Harvey, Dtary of a CardinaVs Nest, 55
and accoinp>anying her on each trip. They worked in the morning
only. The site was a difficult one for building and a great
quantity of stuff was wasted before the foundation was finally
established. It was interesting to observe that when a stem fell
to the floor instead of lodging in the crotch where it was put, the
bird never picked it up, but fiew off in feverish haste for another.
At one stage of the proceeding there was much more nest on the
floor than in the vine. When finished, it was unusually strong
and elaborate for a Cardinal's nest, which is apt to be alarmingly
frail and slight. They used in it a great amount of paper. The
Cardinals' nests which I have examined always contain one or
two pieces of paper, but this one had an entire layer of eight or
ten pieces. The supports and outer layer were of fine twigs and
weed stems, the next layer paper, the next of the thin bark which
they peel from grape vines and honeysuckles, and which is charac-
teristic of all Cardinal's nests. The lining was dried grass.
The nest was completed on the first of May and the first ^gg
was laid the next day. Four eggs were laid. The female did
all the work of incubation, while the male fed her frequently.
Occasionally the female would give a loud whistling call, which
the male immediately obeyed, sometimes bringing her food, some-
times taking a stand near by while she went out for herself.
The conservatory in which the nest was built communicates
with the dining room by means of two glass doors and with the
kitchen by an open window. The nest was on a level with the
eyes of a person standing in the dining room and was about five
feet from one door and about eight feet from the kitchen window.
The position was very exposed, as the Marechal Neil is a spindling
vine, and provides not such covert of leaves as the bird usually
selects. The female bird, who in the winter is much less bold
than the male, was now exceedingly courageous, remaining on
her nest while we watered the very plant in which it was fixed.
Noises in the kitchen did not trouble her in the least. As soon as
the birds began to build we scattered their seed on a shelf near
by instead of in the usual place outside. They did not resort to
it much until after the young were hatched. After the little ones
were flown the old birds seemed to rely upon this supply altogether,
coming to it many times a day.
^6 Harvey, Diary of a CardinaVsi Nest, \/\w
The female began to sit on the nest on the 4th of May. On
the 1 6th three eggs were hatched, the nestlings of equal size and
apparently just out, though as I had been absent the day before 1
cannot say positively. The fourth ^gg did not hatch and was
removed by one of the birds soon after our finding the others
hatched. The parents worked together to feed the young, the
male at first passing food to the mother bird for them and after-
wards feeding them himself. The food was grubs and insects,
which the old birds swallowed and gave to the young by regur-
gitation during the first week. Afterwards it was given directly
and it was then interesting to see what large mouthfuls the
little fellows could accommodate. When nine days old, one of
them swallowed, without choking,, a grub two inches long and
as large as a lead pencil. The birds were remarkably cleanly,
removing all excrement from the nest and carrying it outside of
the greenhouse.
On the 24th of May I noticed the young birds growing ver)'
restless and trying to get out of the nest, while the mother reso-
lutely pushed them back again. On the morning of the 25th they
left the nest, the mother pushing and helping them out. One of
the little ones was drowned in a tank of water, another left the
greenhouse seemingly urged by the parent birds. The next morn-
ing the other left and both were led away to a thicket across the
street. For almost a month after that we saw only the old birds
who continued to come in for food. '
On the 19th of June the father and the young birds, now full-
sized, came for seed, which the parent cracked and fed to the
young. When the little ones left the nest they were dark brown,
with very dark bills. When they returned wings and tail were
red, excepting a little brown at the tips, and red blotches were
appearing on breast and back, so we suppose both to be males.
The bills were still dark. They gave no note but the shrill i>eep
of a young bird. The three came back very often and twice
spent the whole morning inside. Often the young birds would
come alone and help themselves, though they always demanded to
be fed when the father was along. The mother at this time was
sitting on a second nest across the street, so we saw her less often
than before.
^**iw ^] Eaton, Am Epidemic of Roup in the Crow Roost. ^ 7
During most of July and August I was away, and on my return
there were two sets of young birds, but as they were growing more
timid and never appeared altogether, I cannot tell their number.
On the whole the year's nests have been more successful than is
usual for the Cardinal Grosbeak, and we fondly hope that they
will seek the shelter of our roof again next year.
AN EPIDEMIC OF ROUP IN THE CANANDAIGUA
CROW ROOST.
BY ELON HOWARD EATON.
Plate 11.
About the middle of December, 1901, a malady broke out
among the Crows {Corvus americanus) of Ontario County, New
York, which, ere spring, had decimated the ranks of the local
* roost.' As soon as winter had fairly begun, reports commenced
to come in of Crows which had been "blinded by freezing of their
eyes," as the farmers expressed it.
Upon careful examination it was found that the roup had in-
vaded the Ontario flock, and birds were dying daily from its effects.
In one field about twenty dead and dying^ birds were picked up
in one day. Nearly every grove or large field within a distance
of ten miles from the roosting-grounds displayed one or more
dead Crows. Nearly every wandering crow's track in the snow,
after circling round and round in an apparently aimless manner,
would lead one to a black carcass lying under a tree or against a
fence. Usually they sank down with their bills in the snow and
their wings very slightly extended, but sometimes they died in a ,
sitting posture with the feathers of the head ruffled up to their
fullest extent. Often the birds died in trees, clutching the
branches to the last and then falling headlong into the snow or
landing on their backs with the wing tips pointing upwards.
All the sick birds were suffering from an acute inflammation of
58 Eaton. Am Epidemic of Roup in a Craw Roast, |[^
the pharynx and the anterior portion of the head, including the
nostrils and eyes. Often there was a mucous discharge from the
nostrils. The eyes were usually blinded by a membrane forming
over the exterior of the cornea. Sometimes only one eye was
seriously affected, and this was usually the left one, as far as I
noticed. If this membrane was rubbed off, the eye looked quite
clear again and sight was temporarily restored, but within half
an hour the membrane reformed and the patient would flutter
about like a bird with the cerebellum destroyed or with the eyes
shot out.
That death ensued from the acute disease and not merely from
starvation due to blindness was abundantly proved by caring for
sick birds and forcing food down their throats, for they died
in nearly every instance. While it is true that those birds which
survived the disease were, in every instance, birds that had been
blinded in only one eye, we believe that this merely indicates that
the roup was less severe in those cases, which was the cause at
the same time of the slight affection of the eyes and of the bird's
recovery.
It was believed by many that these Crows were suffering from
having wet snow and sleet freeze on their * faces' at night, and
that one eye often escaped because it was more protected by
being tucked under the feathers as the bird slept. There is little
to support this theory, in fact it seems almost absurd. There have
been many winters much more severe which seemed to have no
effect on our crow roosts The disease was an epidemic. This
is further shown by the fact that no serious plague appeared
either in the Rochester roost or in that near Niagara Falls.
Nevertheless, the disease disappeared with the coming of
warmer weather. A visit to the roost about the last of March failed
to discover a single sick bird, although hundreds of corpses were
lying about the grove and in the surrounding fields. The last
evidence of the disease which I saw was a bird sitting in an
open field on the sunny side of the woods on April 6. When
approached he flew lazily to a large oak and, lighting on one of
the larger branches with some ditViculty, proceeded to rub his right
eye on the bark. 'I'he field glass revealed the fact that his eye
was badly swollen, and the surrounding skin was partially bare of
feathers.
^*J^^] Sage, Twntietk Congress o/tkeA.O^U. 59
It is probable that one thousand Crows died of this disease
during the last winter in Ontario County, but when the roost was
visited just before the disbanding in the spring very little difference
was noticeable in the immense numbers of birds which gathered
at dusk to pass the night in that little grove.
The accompanying photographs (PI. II) may give a little help
in understanding the conditions as they actually existed.
TWENTIETH CONGRESS OF THE AMERICAN
ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION.
The Twentieth Congress of the American Ornithologists*
Union convened in Washington, D. C, Monday evening, Novem-
ber 17, 1902. The business meeting was held at the residence
of Dr. C. Hart Merriam, and the public sessions at the U. S.
National Museum, beginning Tuesday, November 18, and con-
tinuing for three days.
Business Session. — The meeting was called to order by the
President, Dr. C. Hart Merriam. Twenty-one Fellows were
present. The Secretary stated that at the opening of the present
Congress the membership of the Union numbered 753, constituted
as follows: Fellows, 48; Honorary Fellows, 16; Corresponding
Fellows, 61 ; Members, 53; Associates, 575.
During the year the Union lost sixty-five members, nine by
death, fourteen by resignation, and forty-two for non-payment of
dues. The deceased members include one Fellow, two Cor-
responding Fellows, one Member and five Associates, as follows :
Maj. James C. Merrill, U. S. A.,* a Fellow, who died at Washing-
ton, D. C, Oct. 27, 1902, in his 50th year; Dr. James G. Cooper,*
a Corresponding Fellow, who died at Hay wards, Calif., July 19,
1902, aged 72 ; Emil Holub,* a Corresponding Fellow, who died at
* For an obituary notice, see Auk, XX, p. 90.
' For an obituary notice, see Ibid.^ XIX, pp. 421-422.
' For an obituary notice, see Ibid.^ XX, p. 92.
6o Sage, Tweniietk Congress oftk9 A, O. U. \!li.
Vienna, February 21, 1902, in the 55th year of his age; Chester
Barlow,^ a Member who died at Santa Clara, Calif., November 6,
1902, at the age of 26; also the fpllowing Associates: Clarence
M. Morrell, who died at Pittsfield, Me., July 15, 1902, aged 30
years ; William H. Daffin, who died at Philadelphia (Tacony), Pa.,
April 21, 1902; Alonzo M. Collett,' who died at Denver, Col.,
Aug. 22, 1902, at the age of 33 years; Aubrey B. Call, who died
at Burlington, Vermont, Nov. 20, 1901, and Curtis C. Young,* who
died at Port Daniel, Quebec, July 30, 1902, at the age of 28 years.
The report of the Treasurer showed the finances of the Union
to be in a satisfactory condition.
All of the officers were reelected, as follows: Dr. C. Hart
Merriam, President; Charles B. Cory and Charles F. Batchelder,
Vice-Presidents ; John H. Sage, Secretary ; William Dutcher,
Treasurer; Frank M. Chapman, Ruthven Deane, K W. Nelson,
Witmer Stone, Drs. A. K. Fisher, Jonathan Dwight, Jr., and Thos,
S. Roberts, members of the Council.
Harry C. Oberholser, of Washington, D. C, was elected a
Fellow; Ernst Hartert, of Tring, England, and John A. Harvie-
Brown, of Larbert, Stirlingshire, Scotland, were elected Honorary
Fellows; Arthur J. Campbell, of Melbourne, Australia, W. P.
Pycraft, of the British Museum, London, Dr. Hermann von
Ihering of the Muscu Paulista, Sao Paulo, Brazil, and Alfred J.
North, of Sydney, New South Wales, were elected Corresponding
Fellows. Eighty-four Associates were elected, and the following
thirteen persons were elected to the class of Members, namely :
Andrew Allison, of Bay St. Ix)uis, Miss.; Dr. William C. Braislin,
of Brooklyn, N. V.; Arthur C. Bent, of Taunton, Mass.; Hubert
Lyman Clark, of Olivet, Michigan ; Edward A. Goldman, Paul
Bartsch, Arthur H. Howell, and Dr. F. H. Knowlton, of Wash-
ington, D. C; Arthur H. Norton, of Westbrook, Maine; Prof. J.
Gilbert Pearson, of Cireenshoro, N. C; Samuel F. Rathbun, of
Seattle, Washington ; P. M. Silloway, of Ivcwiston, Montana; and
Prof. C. C). Whitman, of Chicago, III.
* For an obituary notice, see Auk, XX, p. ()i.
* For an obituary notice, see Ihid.^ XIX, pp. 422-423.
' For an obituary notice, see Ibid.^ XIX, p. 423.
* For an obituary notice, see Ibid.^ XX. p. <^4.
^^9«^]' Sage, Tvfntieth Congress of the A. O. U. 6 1
Drs. Allen, Dwight, Merriam, and Richmond, and Messrs.
Brewster, Ridgway and Stone were reelected * Committee on
Classification and Nomenclature of North American Birds/
Public Session. First Day, The meeting was called to order
by Vice-President Cory.
The first paper of the morning was ' Notes on the life of Eklward
Harris, with extracts from his Journals,* by Geo. Spencer Morris.
Next came * Summer Bird Life of Eastern North Carolina,* by
Prof. J. Gilbert Pearson. This paper provoked much discussion
and many inquiries were made regarding the protection of birds
in North Carolina. Dr. Bishop spoke of the slaughter by market-
men and milliners' agents of the species found along the coast,
and Mr. Dutcher on proposed legislative bills for the preservation
of such birds. Dr. Palmer told of the immense number of ducks
annually taken to the northern markets from the North Carolina
coast. He thought the upland as well as the shore birds needed
protection. Prof. Pearson referred to the destruction of the Bob-
white and of the illegal methods used in shipping them north.
The third paper was * The Development of the Pterylosis,' by
Hubert Lyman Clark. Remarks followed by Dr. Allen, Messrs.
Chapman, and Lucas, and the author.
The afternoon session was devoted to the following papers, all
being illustrated by lantern slides, viz.: * Comparison of the Bird
Life of Gardiner's Island and Cobb's Island,' by Frank M. Chap-
man; and *A Contribution to the Life History of the Herring
Gull,' by Wm. Dutcher.
Second Day, The meeting was called to order by the President.
The first paper, by Dr. J. A. Allen was entitled * The A. O. U.
Check-List — its History and its Future.' Remarks followed by
the Chair.
The second, * A glance at the Historical side of the Check-List
of North American Birds,' was by Witmer Stone, and dealt mainly
with the period preceding the founding of the American Orni-
thologists' Union.
' Evolution of Species and Subspecies as illustrated by certain
Mexican Quails and Squirrels', by E. W. Nelson, was the subject
of the third paper. Remarks followed by Dr. Merriam, Messrs.
Stone, Chapman, Maynard, and the author.
62 Sage, Twntieth Congress of the A, O. U. [J^^
The next, * Form in Bird Music,' by H. W. Olds, was discussed
by Messrs. Brewster, Morris, Dutcher and Fuertes, Mrs. Patten,
the Rev. Wm. R. Lord, and the author.
The concluding papers of the morning were by Dr. R. M.
Strong, entitled: * Change of Color without Molt,* and * Irides-
cence and White Feathers.*
The following papers — all illustrated by lantern slides — were
given at the afternoon session, viz.: 'Some Problems of Local
Bird Population,* by Prof. Walter B. Barrows ; ' Ancient Birds and
their Associates,' by F. A. Lucas ; * Observations on the Herons of
the District of Columbia,* by Paul Bartsch ; and ' Bird Life in the
Bahamas,* by Frank M. Chapman and Louis Agassiz Fuertes.
Third Day. — The meeting was called to order by the President.
Mr. Dutcher, Chairman of the Committee on Protection of North
American Birds, presented the report of his Committee for the
previous year, which was followed by an address by Dr. T. S.
Palmer on * Federal Game Protection in 1902.* By invitation,
Mr. Sheibley, of the U. S. Department of Justice, spoke of certain
prosecutions under the Lacey Act.
* Nesting of the Red-bellied Woodpecker in Harford Co., Md.,*
by Wm. H. Fisher, was the third paper. In the absence of the
author it was read by Dr. Palmer.
The fourth paper, ' An Epidemic of Roup in the Canandaigua
Crow Roost,' by Elon H. Eaton, was read, in the author *s absence,
by Mr. H. W. Olds. Remarks followed by F. A. Lucas, Wm.
Palmer, and Dr. S. D. Judd.
The following papers were read by title:
* Some Variations in the Piping Plover, ^"Egialitis melotia^* by
Dr. Jonathan Dwight, Jr.
' The Significance of Trinomials in Nomenclature,' by Witmer
Stone.
* Notes on Piioiiics amcriianns and Piioidcs arcticus in Minne-
sota,' by Dr. T. S. Roberts.
'Some P'ood Habits of West Indian Hirds,' by B. S. Bowdish.
* The Domestic Affairs of liobwhitc,' by John N. Clark.
Resolutions were adopted thanking the Board of Regents of
the Smithsonian Institution for the use of a hall in the U. S.
National Museum for a place of meeting, and for other courtesies
^**iW^ ] General Notes. 63
extended ; to the Washington members of the Union for the
cordial welcome and generous hospitality shown visiting members ;
to Prof. S. P. Langley, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution,
for his polite invitation to the members of the Union to visit the
National 2^ological Park ; and to the Superintendent of the Park,
Dr. Frank Baker, through whom the invitation was received.
Dr. T. S. Palmer, Mr. Frank M. Chapman and Dr. C. W.
Richmond were appointed 'Committee on International Bird
Protection/ and Ruthven Deane and William Dutcher delegates
to the forthcoming Congress.
The question of holding a Special Meeting of the Union in
California during May or June, 1903, was referred to a Committee,
with power.
On Friday, November 21, after adjournment of the Union,
many members visited the National Zoological Park by invitation
of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Prof. Langley
received the visitors, who were subsequently taken through the
Park by Dr. Frank Baker, the Superintendent.
The Congress adjourned to meet in Philadelphia, November
16, 1903.
Jno. H. Sage,
Secretary,
GENERAL NOTES.
Breeding Grounds of the Black and Socorro Petrels. — A Correction. —
In my recent paper on the * Birds of the Cape Region of Lower Califor-
nia/ I stated (p. 33) that "on July 10, 1896, Mr. Anthony found some
Black and Socorro Petrels breeding together on one of the Coronados
Islands '(in the Gulf of California)." There is a Coronados Island lying
close to the eastern shore of the Peninsula in the Gulf of California in
about latitude 'i(P N., and a group of islands bearing the same name
situated off the Pacific coast only about twenty miles south of San Diego,
California. Just what led me to attribute Mr. Anthony's observations
to the former locality I cannot now remember, but in so doing I was
evidently in error, for Mr. Frank S. Daggett writes me that he has
definite information to the effect that Mr. Anthony did not visit the Gulf
64
General Notes. \^^
of California in 1896, and further that on July 10 of that jear he was at
the Coronados Islands near San Diego — where, moreover, Mr. Daggett
himself has since taken the eggs of both the Petrels above mentioned. —
William Brewster, Cambridge^ Mass.
A Hybrid Duck. — After ten years of hunting for real wild hybrids,
the writer has finally succeeded in securing a drake which he regards at
an even mixture of Mallard and Northern Black Duck. The bird was
shot by the writer about a year ago, and he has waited some time for the
experience to be repeated — as often happens after one has once succeeded
in finding a bird or flower new to him — but I have caught no mate for
my drake.
Several thousands of ducks have been examined in the hope, not merely
of finding rare ducks in the market or in the strings of gunners, but
especially for indications of a crossed breed. Often I have found * blue
bills' which could be assigned only with great difficulty to the species
Aythya affinis or to -<4. marila. Especially was this true of females.
Measurements have been found quite unreliable in deciding these cases,
for it is a common thing to find a male of A. affinis which is up to the
smaller measurements of A. marila^ and often the flank markings are so
indefinite, and the head iridescence also, that no one could say with pre-
cision what the bird was. Hybrids in these races are practically indefin-
able.
But between the Mallard and Black Duck we expected to find crosses,
and also to be able to distinguish them with certainty. While it has been
a common experience to come across Black Ducks which show traces of
Mallard blood, as was Mr. Brewster's experience, I have been unable to
find any Mallard which could be said to bear traces of a Black Duck in-
fusion. It is true that these latter forms would be harder to distinguish,
but the young drakes and females were carefully examined with the possi-
bilities fullv in mind.
These traces of Mallard blood wc have found most common in the form
recentlv described bv Mr. Brewster as Anas obscura rubripes — birds
which we have habitually called "Winter" or "Big" Black Ducks in this
vicinity.
The hybrid here under notice exhibits strong Black Duck characters on
the head, neck and back. The pattern and dusky shade of the Black Duck
are also shown on all portions of the plumage, even where the Mallard
affinities are strongest. Mallard blood shows strongest in the white frame
of t!ie speculum which is about one-half the typical width of white seen
in the Mallard, in the light shade and wavy cross vermiculations of the
scapulars, flanks and belly, in the blackish upper and under tail-coverts,
and in the green of the nape and sides of the crown.
This specimen was in prime physical condition, an adult male with the
testes unusually weU developed considering the time of year. — Elon
Howard Eaton, Rochester y N. Y,
^f^^^] GeMtral Notes, 65
The Wood Ibis again in Colorado. — I am pleased to be able to record
for our State two more specimens of Tantalus loculator (Wood Ibis). These
two birds were shot hy Mr. L. L. Llewellyn of this city (Denver) on Aug.
30, 1902, at a small lake about twelve minutes from the city, and were
identified by myself. By the softness of the bones as well as by the plumage,
it is apparent that they are young of the year. They had remained about
this lake for at least two weeks before they were shot, and although a
house was close by, they were not afraid. They were so tame, in fact,
that they were easily approached in the open and both killed at one shot
at a distance of about forty yards. When picked up the throat and upper
esophagus of one of them contained a carp at least six inches in length,
which had evidently been held in that position fifteen or twenty minutes,
since their movements had been watched for that length of time and no
fish had been taken. — A. H. Felger, Denver^ Colo.
The Stilt Sandpiper in Knox County, Maine. — On August 13, 1902,
I took a specimen of the Stilt Sandpiper {Microfalama himantofus) on
Matenic Island, Knox County, Maine. If I am not mistaken, this is the
first record of this species for that county. I was shooting Turnstones
on some half-tide ledges between Matenic and Matenic Green Island, when
I noticed a bird flying in from seaward which I took to be a Summer Yel-
lowleg. When it came within shooting distance I dropped it on the
rocks, and on picking it up, was surprised to find that I had a Stilt Sand-
piper, which later I found to be a female.
August 23, I found Wilson's Petrel (Oceanites oceanicus) in numbers,
four miles south of Seguin Island. They were feeding on the wash of
the bait from a fisherman's hook, and were noticed a number of times to
plunge beneath the surface of the water for the food they were after.
Although I have watched many thousands of Leach's Petrels while they
were feeding, I have yet to see one plunge beneath the surface. — Her-
bert L. Spinney, Segnin^ Me.
Massachusetts Breeding Dates for Bartramia longicauda. — For the
last eight years I have had the pleasure of watching some six to eight
pairs of Bartramian Sandpipers on the sheep fields of Marthas Vineyard,
the remnant of what was formerly not an uncommon breeder there. As
a result, I have the following personal breeding records :
June 3, 1894. Nest with four eggs, incubation one third advanced.
June 4, 1894. Nest with four young, just hatched and running.
May 25, 1895. Nest with four eggs, incubation commenced.
May 25, 1895. Nest with broken shells, destroyed probably b)- a Crow.
May 30, 1896. Nest with four eggs, incubation one fourth advanced.
May 25, 1900. Nest with four eggs, incubation commenced.
Mr. Mackay has recorded a nest of three eggs found on Tuckernuck
Island on June 22, 1896 (Auk, April, 1897, p. 229), but the date and num-
66 General Notes. [^^
ber of o>(«jjs would appear to ine to indicate a second laying, the first
having probably been destroyed.
I am induced to give these records because Mr. Howe has stated in his
notes on these birds made at Williamstown, Mass. (Auk» Oct. 1902, p.
404), that the birds did not probably breed in Massachusetts until after
the middle of Tune. This niav be true in Berkshire Counlv, but is cer-
tainly not true in Massachusetts as a whole. The average summer tem-
perature at Marthas Vineyard is 67^° and at Williamstown about (>y\ but
in winter the range is from 32- at the former to 22*^ at the latter. This
causes an earlier spring at Marthas Vineyard and will account for some
dtttcrence in nesting dates, though I should hardly expect to find it so
much as tlirce weeks. — Owkn Dirfke, Fall River, Mass.
Recent Records of the Wild Pigeon. — Occasionally some old-timer
writes to the newspapers announcing the return of the Wild Pigeon
(Ectopistes mi^ra/orius). and in nine cases out of ten the Mourning
I)o\x* {'Aeunidura nmcroiiru), has been the innocent cause. One recent
discussion in the Toronto papers was brought to an abrupt and apparently
satisfying conclusion by the announcement, copied from a Nporting
journal, that one ot the American consuls in South America had stated
that the Wild Pigeon hail taken refuge on. 1 think, the east side ot the
Andes, anyway that the consul and pigeons were far enough awa\ to
satisfy the most inquiring. I have for some time kept a careful record of
reported announcements of Wild Pigeons, and among them I have selected
the following as reliable :
i8t/). October 22, Toronto. "Saw eleven Wild Pigeons flying in a south-
west course over Well's Ilill.'*- |. Hughes Samuel.
iSyS. April 14. Winnij>egosis, Manatoba. An adult male taken, mounted
by .Mr. Cj. 1'. Atkinsf)n. Winnipeg.
1S9S. September 14. Detroit, Michigan. Immature bird taken, mounted
by Mr. C. Campion, Detroit, by whom it was sent to me.
it/xj. May \(\, Toronto, Ont. Mr. Oliver Spanner saw a flock of about
ten flying west over the mouth of the Ktibocoke River (ten miles
west of Toronto), iKtween 10 and 11 a. m., and about an hour after-
wards the same flock returneil. tlying eastward towards I^ong Branch.
Mr. J. G. Joppling had joined Mr. Spanner and saw the birds return;
they were flying low, just over the t^ee^.
K/X). July 6. Toronto, Ont. **Sa\\ five at Centre Island going south\\est
They passed out over the lake."— J. Hui^heN Samuel.
1902. May i(\ Penctanquishene, Ont. One '^een : pair seen two days later,
in same locality b\ Mr. .\. K. ^'ounl;. 1. 11. Flf..min(j, Toronto. Ont.
Turkey Vulture at Moose Factory. James Bay.— The Rt. Rev. Dr.
Newnhan. Bishop of Moosonee, examined a Turkey Vulture (Catkttrtes
aurtt) taken by one ot his men at Moose Tactory in June, 1898. The
record was given to me the following year, but I neglected to record it. —
J. H. Fi.KMiNti, Toronto^ Ont.
^"w^l General Notes. 67
Black Vulture at Taunton, Mass.— I take pleasure in recording the
capture of an adult female Black Vulture (CatAarista urubu) at Taunton,
Mass., on Oct. 5, 1902. This is the first record for the species in Bristol
County, and there are but verj few records for the State.
The bird was discovered sitting on the roof of a barn, where it remained
while its captor went to the house for his gun. — A. C Bent, Taunton^
Mass.
Golden Eagle in Middle Southern Ohio.— To my only record of Aquila
ckrysacios for middle southern Ohio as given in the * Wilson Bulletin'
for September, 1902, page 83. 1 am now able to add another. On Nov. 15,
1902, I received an almost adult female in the flesh, shot Nov. 14, two
miles from Waverly, Ohio. It measured : Extent, 2150 mm.J* bill, 83 mm.
{curvature included); tarsus, 110 mm.; tail, 335 mm.; wing, 620 mm.;
length without bill, 820 mm. — W. F. Henninger, Tiffin, Ohio.
Richardson's Merlin (Falco columbarius rickardsonii) on the Coast of
South Carolina. — Upon looking over some Pigeon Hawks {F. columbarius)
that I had packed away for many years, I came across a superb female
that struck me at once as being none other than Richardson^s Merlin.
Upon comparing the specimen with Mr. Ridgway*s description in his
* Manual of N. A. Birds* I found the bird to agree perfectly. The seconda-
ries, primaries and primary coverts are margined terminally with white.
The outer webs of the primaries (except the second) are spotted with
ochraceous. The tail has six light and five dark bands. The specimen is
apparently an adult female and was shot and prepared by the writer on
October 15, 1895, near Mount Pleasant, S. C.
To what extent the list of South Carolina birds can h^ increased bv the
capture of northwestern birds there can be no conjecture. — Arthur T.
Wayne, Mount Pleasants S. C.
The Bam Owl on Long Island. — When Mr. Beard made the record of
this species in *The Auk,* Vol. XIX, p. 398, he evidently had overlooked
the previous record of the same family of owls in Vol. Ill, p. 439. —
Willi A.M Dutcher, New York.
Bam Owl in Northern Ohio. — While the Barn Owl {Sirix pratincola)
is a fairly common bird in the State of Ohio south of Columbus, records
of this bird from northern Ohio are rather scarce {cf. Oberholser, Birds of
Wayne Co., Ohio, p. 280). In a local collection here I found two mounted
specimens, not sexed, of this species, both killed in the fall of 1901 almost
within the city limits of Tiffin. One of these had been kept in captivity
for about six months by the coroner of Seneca County. A third speci-
men was seen at the time the others were captured. — W. F. Henninger,
Tiffin, Ohio.
68 General Notes. \^
Yellow-billed Cuckoo*8 Egg in a Robin's Nest. — On July 2, 1902, while
examining Tarious nests in a lot back of my house in Granby, Conn., as
was my almost daily habit, I found in a Robin^s nest with two e^g%% an
egg of the Yellow-billed Cuckoo ( Coccyxus americanms). The nest proved
to be deserted, although early on the ist of July, when the Robin's eggs
were the sole contents, both birds were about. There is no mistaking the
^ggJ light greenish blue, 1.3 1 X .93, elliptical. — Stanley W.Edwards,
Granby^ Conn.
Breeding of the Alder Flycatcher {Empidonax traillii alnormm) near
Plainfield, New Jersey. — In * The Auk ' for January, 1901, 1 recorded the
probable breeding of the Alder Flycatcher in Ash Swamp near Plainfield,
New Jersey.
The question was settled the following summer by finding two nests in
that locality. The first, which I found on June x6, contained three eggs,
which proved to be the full set. On the 20tli I discovered another nest
with three eggs, which had increased to four on the 23rd. These two
nests were only a few rods apart, both placed in wild rose bushes within
three feet of the ground. The sitting birds would slip away at my ap-
proach and it was with some difficulty that I at length succeeded in seeing
one of them actually on the nest. This nest and eggs I took and they are
at present in my collection.
The above dates show the Alder Flycatcher to be one of our latest
breeders, ranking in this respect with the Goldfinch and the Cedar Wax-
wing.
I found this bird at two other localities in July, 1901 — a small swampy
tract a mile west of Ash Swamp, and Great Swamp, Morris County, New
Jersey — in each of which it undoubtedly nests. It seems probable,
therefore, that it breeds in suitable localities all through northern New
Jersey, and it will be of interest to learn how much, if any, further south
its breeding range extends. It is not included in Thurber's * List of the
Birds of Morris County,' and in the recent * Birds of Princeton' it is
given as a transient only.
While studying this little flycatcher in its haunts I recorded the ordinary
song note as kra-teal or great deal. Later I found that Mr. P. B. Peabody
had written it grea' deal. This is, to my ear, the best representative of
the note that I have seen. Sometimes, as stated by Mr. J. A. Farley in
his recent article, it is given in almost one syllable as krreaU but I do not
think that the apparent length or number of syllables is dependent on the
distance of the bird, for I have heard the grea* deal M-hen within a few feet
of the performer. — W. I). W. Millkr, Plainfield, N.J.
Western Evening Grosbeaks Nesting in Mexico. — Out some 200
miles from the city of Chihuahua and close to the Sonora line, I saw
ditlcrent bunches of Western Evening Grosbeaks {CoccotArattstes vesper-
i^n I General Notes,
«9<>J J
69
tinus momiamms). This being in June, all were mated and preparing to
nest.
One daj, while riding up a water-course in the heart of a great pine
forest, I saw, but 20 or 30 j^ards away, a female Grosbeak with a beak full
of drj grass, hopping on the ground, closely followed by three males. I
drew up at once, and from the saddle I watched the actions of the birds,
with the hope that I might discover the location of the nest. The three
males, in their anxiety each one to be nearer than the other to the female,
caused her to drop her load, and fly into a pine tree, the three males fol-
lowing. The whole lot finally disappeared among the pines well up the
hill-side. Examination of the tree into which the birds flew revealed
nothing, and though I passed this spot every day or two, I saw nothing
more of the birds. At other times I followed pairs that had come some
distance to drink, from tree to tree over hills and hollows, with nothing
but failure at the end. — Geo. F. Breninger, Pkaenix, Ariz.
Another Record of phryothorus ludovicianus in Massachusetts. — As I
was returning home about seven o'clock on the morning of Septeml)er 6,
1902, I stopped near the edge of a damp thicket of bushes and small trees,
consisting of willows, red maples and gray birches, with tangles of briars
and wild grapes. This tract, several acres in extent, is in the northern
part of Fall River, Mass. After a few moments my attention was
attracted by a new bird song. This came from a black alder bush, which
was so thick I could not identify the singer. After singing there for a
few moments, the bird hopped on to an exposed twig, and I at once
secured it, — a male Carolina Wren. Dr. Dwight, after examining the
bird, has kindly written me that it is a young bird, in juvenal plumage.
Among other variations of the song, I noted some which I presume are
those Mr. Chapman refers to as the * tea-kettle ' notes. — Owen Durfee,
Fall Rir>er^ Mass.
The Blue-gray Gnatcatcher in Massachusetts. — I obticrved a Gnat-
catcher, doubtless the Blue-gray (Polioptila casruUa) at West Manchester,
Mass., November 16, 1902. My attention was at first attracted by a
new bird note — a nasal twee — several times repeated. The bird was
flitting about in the top of an apple-tree and gave me a good, though
brief opportunity to note his catbird-like form and kinglet-like actions
before he tiew farther ott". He was very active and soon disappeared
entirely, but not without having shown me his blue-gniy color against
the green of a Norway spruce. Messrs. Ilowe and Allen's list of the
* Birds of Massachusetts,* credits the State with six records for this spe-
cies — all in the fall (August 27 - December 18). West Manchester is only
a few miles from Magnolia, where Mr. Outram Bangs took an immature
female, August 27, 1879. — Francis H. Allen, Boston. Mass.
/
O General Notes.
CAuk
Ohio Notes. — The Red-headed Woodpeckers {Mclunerpes erytkro-
cephalus) have practically deserted this section. Prior to 1899 they were
numerous, but during the past three years they have become less and less
common, until now they are almost extinct as far as this locality is con-
cerned. Formerly almost everj' telegraph pole contained one or more
nests, but this year I examined poles extending over sixteen miles but
found onlv eleven nests.
The only cause that can be assigned for their disappearance i^ the
erection of new poles which were, perhaps, too solid for the construction
of nests. The other species of woodpeckers, which usual I % nest in trees,
show no decrease.
There has been a noticeable increase in the numbers of Baltimore
Orioles in the past two years and now they are as common as Catbirds
and Bluebirds. The Bluebirds (Sialia fiaiis) h;i.ve decreased to some
extent, but are still common. Cov^ birds have deserted this immediate
vicinity, while ten miles west they are numerous. — Nat S. (fKKF.N,
Camp Denuison^ Ohio.
Birds Killed by Hailstones. — On SeptemlKM 20. i<;o2. we had in "The
Highlands' of this city a severe hail-storm, lasting from 6.00-6.25 p. m.,
during which time hail from :| in. to \ in. in diameter fell hard and fast.
On the following morning, when the storm had cleared away, beneath the
tall Cottonwood trees at the intersection of West Twenty-fourth Avenue
and Boulevard F. lay scores of little bodies of feathered dead. There
were beneath fourteen trees eights -four birds by actual count, one tree
alone, the largest of them all, spreading its arms above the forms of
twenty-tive sleeping songsters. House Finches and English Sparrows,
that on previous days had battled among the branches above now lay side
by side, with half a dozen Robins interspersed. — A. H. Fklcjer, Deui'er^
Colo.
Vernacular Names of Birds. — In the present numlKT of 'The Auk'
(pp. 3^-42) Dr. Edwin \V. Doran proposes certain rules for the construc-
tion of vernacular names of birds, relating mainly to the use or non-use
of the hyphen in certain classes of names. If the use of the hyphen could
be permanently regulated b\ the formulation of a set of rules, how great
a boon would be conferred upon writers, and particularly upon editors!
As, however, the u.se of the hyphen \aries within wide limits, in accord-
ance with the radically different rules enforced by editors or publishing
houses, from its practical non-use to its employment to connect remote
elements into a compound word, there is little hope of securing a uniform
system of hyphenization in the construction of bird names. Every observ-
ing persr)n knows that many of the current magazines have adopted what
may fairly be termed an anti-hyphen fad, this greatly abused but very use-
ful sign Inring practically tabooed by them as a connective between the
^"^w^] General Notes. 7 1
parts of compound words. Or, to put it still better, compound words are
either printed as a single word or their elements are treated as separate
words, generally the latter. But in publications which allow the hyphen
its time-honored function, great diyersit^ is met with in the manner of its
use in just the class of cases to which Dr. Doran has called our attention.
In discussing this matter by letter with Dr. Doran, I stated that I should
greatly prefer current usage to his rules, and write Gyrfalcon and Sparrow
Hawk instead of Gyr-falcon and Sparrow-Hawk. 1 should also write not
onU" such names as Redpoll, Yellowthroat, and Bluebird -without the
hyphen, but also Kingbird, Nighthawk, and Meadowlark in the same
way, as against King-bird, Night-Hawk, and Meadow-Lark, as required by
his rules.
This, of course, brought up the question of what is 'current usage';
and Dr. Doran replied that he would determine current usage, or "good
usage," or "general usage" by such authorities as the * Century Diction-
ary," the 'Standard Dictionary,' Murray's great 'English Dictionary,'
and Newton's 'Dictionary of Birds," and states, no doubt correct Iv, that
his rules conform to those employed in these authoritatiye works. In
other words, hard-and-fast rules are followed for the determination of
what phrases are properly to be written as compound words, requiring
the use of the hyphen. The 'Century,' he admits, writes 'Kingbird'
while all the others write 'King-bird.' **One can hardly," he says, "be
said to go counter to good usage, with such authorities as these on his
side; there are no better in the English-speaking world." ^
But i^ there not another side to the subject.^ The form words finally
take in a language is reached by a process of change, or through ' evolu-
tion,' by the suryiyal, perhaps not of the fittest, but of the form most
favored. Many compound words now almost uniyersally printed as one
word without a hyphen, were originally used as two separate and distinct
words, and later as a hyphenized compound word, and later still as a
single word without any hyphen. For example, the word handbook is
still current in three forms — hand book, hand-book, and handbook,
though the first is now rare. Many similar cases must occur to every-
one, especially among words that are comparatively new, ow ing their ori-
gin to recent inventions and discoveries requiring the coining ot new-
terms to indicate new processes, forces, and substances.
Frequency of use of a compound word has obviously much to do with
its form. It is common to write 'forehead' * fore-neck,' and 'hind neck,'
• I trust there is no breach of courtesy in thus referring to a private corre-
spondence. Dr. Doran has expressed the hope that a subject so important
will be fully discussed, and for this reason preferred to publish his criticism of
the A. O. U. Check- List vernacular names in 'The Auk'; and has further-
more had the kindness to suggest that I should publish my views on the sub-
ject in the same issue of this journal.
72 General Notes. [^^*J
the frequency of their use being indicated by the order in which thev
are here written. Forehead is a common everydajr word in constant
use ; fore-neck is in less frequent employ and is a more special term, while
hind neck is comparatively infrequent; but in modern descriptive nat-
ural history writing, where all are in frequent use, the tendency is to
give all the same form, writing each phrase as a single word without the
hyphen. In the same way we have, in the same class of descriptive writ-
ing, * toothrow,' * underparts,' and * upperparts,' although the dictionaries
treat each as either two separate words, or as requiring the hyphen. It
is thus the users of words and not the dictionary makers, with their fixed
rules based on ' language-principles,^ that determine the form of much-
used compound words. When * general usage ' has established the form
of a word, contrary to the ruling of our 'standard authorities,^ they later
usually fall in line, as shown abundantly by the history of many com-
mon word-forms.
In the aise of bird names (and other animal and plant names as well), it
is more common to blend an adjective and a noun, as in bluebird, than
two nouns as in nighthawk; and in the treatment of both these classes
of words, our * standard authorities,' the dictionaries, are more or less
inconsistent, for the reason just stated. For example, * flycatcher' is
almost universally written without a hyphen, while * gnatcatcher ' and
* oystercatcher ' are almost as uniformly written with a hyphen. In the
Check-List, and almost universally, except in the dictionaries and in
English publications, we have Barn Owl, Orchard Oriole, and Marsh
Hawk, instead of Barn-Owl, Orchard-Oriole, and Marsh-Hawk, etc. In
the Check-List, we have Meadowlark and Nighthawk, on the ground that
in the one case the bird is not a lark and in the other, is not a hawk; and
the name in each case is written solid as one word for the purpose of indi-
cating the fact by making a new name.
The rule requiring the compounding and hyphenizing of such bird
names as Ivory (Jull, Herring Gull, Wood Duck, Night Heron, Clapper
Rail. Stilt Sandpiper, Mountain Plover, Passenger Pigeon, Wood Ibis,
Song Sparrow, Clitt Swallow, Tree Creeper, etc., is a purely arbitrary,
dictionary ' language principle' so long as (iray Gull, Green Heron,
Brown Creeper, Painted Hunting. Varied Thrush, and all similar bird
names are treated by the same ' languagtr-principles' as composed of two
separate words. The practical inconvenience of enforcing the dictionary
rules in such cases is considerable, Kince in indexes, in looking for Ivory
Gull, Herring (jiill, and similarly with other names, we would find our
gulls siattcrod under half-a-do/en ditlerent letters of the alphabet, and
our pigeons, sparrows, pewees, \varl)lcrs, etc., similarly dispersed. In
the case of the Ivory (iull, ivory is just as much a descriptive adjective
as gray, or hiack-baikcd. referring to its color (inaccurately of course),
and not indicating that it is made of ivory or has anything to do with
ivory. ' Water-Thrush * is thus written in the Ciieck-List especially to
indicate that it is not a thrush, and ' (^^lail-Dove to indicate a group of
pigeons that, superficially at least, have a resemblance to both quails and
doves. It would be better to write the first waterthrush, in conformity
with meadowlark and nighthawk.
In short, the whole matter resolves itself into a question of convenience,
since convenience determines use, which in turn is * current usage* ; and
current usage as already said, is not necessarily established by our * stand-
ard authorities,* but by the people to whom the words are most necessary,
and by whom they are hence most used. In British English many words
are spelled differently from what they are in American English, and
hyphens are used in the former much more freely, as a rule, than in the
latter. In American publications of all sorts, except dictionaries, the
names of birds, animals and plants are written, as regards hyphenized
words, practically in accordance with the system followed in the A. O. U.
Check-List. By the British method, and by Dr. Doran's rules, we should
lose most of our sparrows, gulls, plovers, rails, etc., and should have, in
their places, Song-Sparrows, Tree-Sparrows, Field-Sparrows, Sage-Spar-
rows, Vesper-Sparrows, and similarly hyphenized gull-names, plover-
names, rail-names, and soon to the end of the list, producing little short
of a revolution in the arrangement of our bird names in indexes, and in
the use of the hyphen in vernacular names of animals in general, and
the introduction of a method entirely contrary to present tendencies in
American English. Better a little inconsistency than hard-and-fast rules
that tend to inconvenient and cumbersome word-forms without anv adc-
quately offsetting advantage. — J. A. Allen, Am. Afus. Nat. Hist., New
York City.
RECENT LITERATURE.
Ridgway*8 ^Birds of North and Middle America.' Part II. — It is with
great pleasure that we record the appearance of Part II * of Mr. Ridgway's
* Birds of North and Middle America.' In reviewing Part I (Auk, XIX,
* The Birds | of | North and Middle America : | A Descriptive Catalogue |
of the I Higher Groups, Genera, Species, and Subspecies of lUrds | known to
occur in North America, from the | Arctic Lands to the Isthmus of Panama,
I the West Indies and other Islands | of the Caribbean Sea, and the Gala-
pagos Archipelago. | By | Robert Ridgway, | Curator, Division of Birds. | —
I Part II. I Family Tanagridae — The Tanagers. | Family Icteridx — The
Troupials. | Family Coerebidae — The Honey Creepers. — Family Mniotiltidx*
— The Wood Warblers. | — | Washington: | Government Printing Office. |
1902. = Bulletin of the United States National Museum, No. 50. Part II. —
8vo, pp. i-xx -f- 1-834, pll. i-xxii.
74 r<ecent IMerature. ^^"^
Jan. 1902, pp. 97-102) the scope and general character ot this great work,
the classification adopted, and the method of treatment employed, were
stated at some length ; it is hence necessary in the present connection
merely to state the scope and some of the special points of the present
volume.
Part I included only the single great family Kringillid*, while Part II
covers the four families Tanagridie, Icteridie, Cotrebidae, and Mniotiltidaf.
As previously noted, Mr. Ridgway has transferred the genera Pitylus
and Siiltaforiro\x\ the Tanagridx* to the Fringillida*. The genus Calypto-
philus is also now excluded and provisionally referred to the Mimidae;
certain species referred by Dr. Sclater to the genus Cklorospiza^ forming
the genus Hemiapin^us Cabanis, are removed to the Mniotiltida; ; and the
genus hidophanes Ridgway is transferred from the Cotrebida to the
Tanagridif. As now constituted, 21 genera of Tanagrid«e come within
the scope of the present work, and are represented by 112 species and
subspecies.
The family Icterida comprises 21 genera and 11 1 species and subspecies,
of which 42 are included under the single genus Icterus^ which the author
finds himself unable to satisfactorily divide into subgenera. He also
confesses his inability to separate the family into subfamilies, notwith-
standing the wide extremes in structure and habits shown by its different
components.
The family Ca'rebid.T include^ 6 genera and 29 species and subspecies.
The family Mniotiltidie has 2S genera and iSi species and subspecies,
of which 57 belong to the single genus Dendroica, 14 to Helmimtkopkila,
23 to Geothlypis, and 9 to Basilcnterus. ''^ HelmiHthopkila ctHcinnatieHsis
(Langdon) is not introduced into the * key ' for the reason that it is ob-
viously a hybrid between //. //'////.sand Oporornis formosa^^ ; //. lawrencei
and H. leurohrofic/iialis^ however, are treated as species, but the problem
of their relationships is considered a very complicated one, it being
"altogether probable .... that dichromatism as well as hybridism enters
into the question of their origin." It seems hard to lay the ghost ot
Wilsoii's y(H$cicapa minuia^ or ' Small-headed Flycatcher,' which here
still niascjuerades as Wibonia microcephala Ridgway, on account of "the
peculiar combination of characters indicated in the original description
being shared by no other bird to my [Ridgway's] knowledge." That
there could have l>een any error in Wilson's description is not intimated.
The Sylvia man faun of Wilson {Dendroica motttana of the A. O. U.
1I\ pothetical List) is, however, synonymisod as the young of D. vireHS\
but Audubon's Sylvia carhonala is given a place as DtHdroica carbomaia,
although it "continues to l>e known only from Audubon's description and
colored plate."
Among the new species and subspoi ics here described for the first time
are two from the I'nited States, namelx, Coinpso/klypis americana rama'
limr (p. 486, geographic distribution added on p. 783), the Mississippi
Valley form of the Parula Warbler, which is said to have a breeding range
^*1^^^^] ^^^^^^ Literature. 75
"from LoiiiFiana and Texas to Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota *'; and
Wilsonia pusilla ckryseola, separated as a Pacific coast form of W. p.
fileolttta^ breeding from southern California to British Columbia. The
new extralimital forms include Phoenicothrauph rubica nehoniy from
Yucatan ; Geothlypis incompta^ from Abaco Island, Bahamas ; Geotklyfis
exigua^ from Andros Island, Bahamas ; Geothlypis flavida^ from New
Providence, Bahamas; Geothlypis nelsoni micro rhync ha ^ from Hidalgo,
Mexico; Basileuterus culirivorus Jlavesceus^ from the State of Jalisco,
Mexico; and Rhodinocincla rosea eximea^ separated as the Central Amer-
ican form of true rosea of South America.'
In respect to generic changes, Megaquiscalus is raised to a full genus
for the Boat-tailed Grackles, as is Holoquiscalus for the West Indian
Grackle.s, thus restricting ^uiscalus to ^. quiscnla and its subspecies.
Peucedramus is very properly raised to a full genus for the Olive Warbler ;
Oporornis and Chamcethlypis are also raised to full genera, and the old
genus Setophaga is restricted to 5. ruticilla and S. picta.
Under Chamcethlypis^ Geothlypis poliocephala ralphi of the A. O. U.
Check-List is considered inseparable from iruQ poliocephala. Of Piranga
rubriceps, introduced into the Check-List as a straggler (standing as
[607.1] ) on the basis of its capture in California, Mr. Ridgway says : "The
identification of the specimen on which the record is based in undoubtedly
correct ; but even granting no mistake has been made as to the specimen
having actually been taken in California, the occurrence must have been
wholly fortuitous, most likely an escape from captivity, and the species
has no claim to a place in the North American fauna " (p. 776). It is so
exclusively a South American bird that it is treated as extralimital to the
scope of the work here under notice. In all probability Icterus icterus^ a
South American Oriole said to have been taken at Charleston, S. C, has
no better claim to a place in our list, and should be similarly excluded. It
may be added that several * Texas* birds admitted provisionally on the
authority of Giraud, — as Setophaga miniata, Cardellina ntbri/rons,
Ergaticus ruber ^ and the two species of Basileuterns — receive no confir-
mation of their claim to recognition as Texas species, the collation of the
records and material thus far gathered only serving to throw greater doubt
upon the supposed Texas origin of Giraud's specimens on which these
species are alleged to have been originally based. The nearest point of
record for several of them is still the highlands of Mexico.
Icterus audubonii is treated as a subspecies of /. melanoccphalus. The
1 We would suggest that it would be a convenience to reviewers and bibli-
ographers, and probably to others, if the author would indicate, either in the
text, table of contents, or in a separate list, the new forms described, as they
are not always clearly indicated in the text, and have to be determined by an
examination of the context. Omission is also made, in several instances, to
indicate a type specimen for the new form.
76 ReceMt Literature. [J^
range of Agelaius pkoeniceus richmondi is extended northward to include
"the» coast district and lower Rio Grande Valley of southern Texas,"
which therefore brings it within the limits of the Check-List. All the
North American forms of Sturnella are made subspecies of magna ^ except
neglecta^ which Mr. Ridgway continues to look upon as a full species.
Mr. Ridgway admits eight forms of the Geothlypis trichas group, aftd
discusses at some length their distribution and relationships, as also the
seven forms recognized from the Bahamas. We regret the lack of space
to transcribe his very interesting presentation of the case. G. trichas
scirpicoJa Grinnell is considered as not separable from G, t. arizela
Oberholser.
The present volume exceeds the first in size by about one hundred
pages, and includes 55 more species and subspecies, Part 11 containing
433 — 3'^ species and 117 subspecies. The 22 plates illustrate the struct-
ural details of 77 genera.
In execution Part II conforms in all its details with Part I, so that the
explanation of methods of treatment, and the high commendation already
given for Part I, apply equally to Part II, which is marked throughout by
the extreme care and thoroughness so well known to characterize Mr.
Ridgway's technical work. Finally, we heartily congratulate the author
and all ornithologists that wc have assurance that Part III is so well
advanced that we may confidently expect its publication before the end of
the present year, it being already in press. — J. A. A.
Mrs. Bailey*8 'Handbook of Birds of the Western United Sutes.'*—
As stated in the publisher's announcetnent, "This book is intended to do
for the western part of the United States what Mr. Frank M. Chapman^s
* Handbook* has done for tlie East. It is written on similar lines, and
gives descriptions and biographical sketches of all our western birds in a
thoroughly scientific yet not unduly technical form, including all the
United States species not treated by Chapman, besides those which arc
common to both sections of the country." This is a perfectly fair state-
ment of the scope and character of the work, which in method of execu-
tion and accuracy of detail merits the highest commendation. The author
has had rare opportunities for personal observation of the birds in life of
which she writes, having spent several seasons in the field in Texas, in
Arizona, and in California, and has enjoyed an especially favorable
environment for the production of a thoroughly accurate and well-
1 Handbook of Hirds | of the | Western United States | including | the
Great Plains, (ireat Hasin, Pacific Slope. | and Lower Kio C»rande Valley | By
Florence Mcrrtam liailey | With thirty-tlvcc full-pajje plates by I>ouis | Agassii
Fuertes, and over six hundred cuts in the text | | Vignette] Boston and New
Vork I Houghton. Mittlin and Company | The Riverside Press, Cambridge
I 1902 — i2mo, pp. i-xc -f »-5i2. Price, $3-50, postaj^e extra.
^**/iJ^] Rtceni Literature, ^"J
balanced manual of the birds of the western United States. Indeed, as
stated in her * prefatory note/ she has had the advice and the help of
experts, and the resources of the National Museum and Biological Survey
collections as a basis for the technical side of her work.
In an * introduction * of nearly 80 pages are stated, first, the general
sources of information upon which she has relied in the general treat-
ment of the subject Then follows a section (pp. xxvi-xxxiii) on collect-
ing and preparing birds, nests, and eggs by her husband, Mr. Vernon
Bailey, who has also contributed more or less of the biographical matter
throughout the book. There are directions for note-taking and keeping
journals, and several pages on *■ life zones,* with a map, by her brother Dr.
C. Hart Merriam, of the United States west of about the looth meridian
and northern Mexico, shaded to indicate the various life areas. * Migra-
tion ' and * economic ornithology * are briefly treated, and there are half a
dozen pages on * bird protection ' by Dr. T. S. Palmer. Then follow a num-
ber of briefly annotated local lists, most of them here for the first time pub-
lished, as : * List of the Birds of the vicinity of Portland, Oregon,* by A.
W. Anthony ; • List of Water Birds of San Francisco Bay,* by William H.
Kobb6; ^List of Birds of Santa Clara Valley and Santa Cruz Mountains,
exclusive of Water Birds,' by Walter K. Fisher; ♦ List of Birds to be
looked for in the vicinity of Pasadena,* by Joseph Grinnell; * List of Birds
of Cheyenne and vicinity,* by Frank Bond. A *List of the Birds of
Fort Sherman, Idaho,* is compiled from the late Df. J. C. Merrill* s notes
in Vols. XIV and XV of * The Auk,' and a list for Pinal, Pima, and Gila
Counties, Arizona, is compiled from W. E. D. Scott*s papers published in
Vols. III-V of *The Auk.' An important but very condensed list of
* Books of Reference * occupies pp. Ixxxiii-lxxxviii.
The main body of the work (pp. 1-477 treats of the species and sub-
species in systematic sequence, in the order of the A. O. U. Check-List,
and following its nomenclature. An appendix gives a * Field Color Key *
to the genera of the more common passerine birds, and is followed by a
very full index. The systematic portion of the book is furnished with
very freely illustrated keys to the higher groups, as well as the usual keys
to the genera and species. Mr. Fuertes*s 36 full-page plates illustrate in
full-length figures leading types of the bird life of the region, and a large
number of additional heads, by the same author, and here first published,
contribute further to the attractiveness, as well as usefulness of the work.
Many new outlines of structural features are added from drawings by Miss
Franceska Weiser, while a large number of additional illustrations are
from the publications of the Biological Survey, 'The Auk,' 'Osprey,* and
the author's previous works. Besides all these, a large number of photo-
graphic illustrations from bird skins are introduced, often with excellent
effect, but, owing largely to the small scale of the reproduction, not infre-
quently they fail to be either very useful or attractive embellishments.
Without going further into details, it may suffice to say that the author
is to be congratulated on having produced a very much needed Handbook
78
liecent Literainre. Ljm
in a thoroughly creditable manner, and has thereby merited the thanks of
thousands of bird student^ to whom her book will truly prove a * boon.* —
J. A. A.
Brewster's ' Birds of the Cape Region of Lower California. ' ^ — The
Cape Region of Lower California, as here defined, comprises the terminal
portion of the peninsula '* southward from the northern base of the moun-
tains between La Paz on the Gulf shore and the town of Todos Santos on
the P.acific Const,'' and is a sharply defined faunal and floral area, charac-
terized by peculiar climatic conditions which have left their impress upon
the animal and plant life- It is a mountainous country, separated from
the more northern part of the peninsula by a low desert tract which forms
a formidable barrier to the extension of plant and animal life, cither from
the north southward or from the south northward. It has a rather humid
climate, and is situated on the edge of the tropics, the Tropic of Cancer
crossing the center of the region. Its area embraces about two degrees of
latitude and one of longitude.
The basis of this excellent monograph consists of a collection of '* up-
wards of 4,400 birds" made for the author by Mr. M. Abbott Frazar in
1S87. An * Introduction ' of twelve pages is devoted largely to an itiner-
ary of the trip, which describes in detail the localities where Mr. Frazar
collected, and also defmes the region and indicates its peculiar physical
characteristics. The 'Systematic Notice of the Birds' occupies pages
13-219. and is followed by a bibliography, and a good index. Mr. Brew-
ster regrets that there is so little to record respecting the life histories of
the species, Mr. Frazar's field notes proving scanty, and other ornitholo-
gists who have visited the region seem to have been more intent on
gathering and preparing specimens than on recording field observations.
'* The main portion of my paper," savs the author. " treats only of birds
which are definitely known to have occurred in the Cape Region, but in
dealing with the distribution ot such of these as are not confined to this
area, 1 have consulted — and frequently cited, also — all the more impor-
tant records that I could find relating to the central and upper parts of the
I'eninsula as well as to southern California, and in addition I have out-
lined, briefly, the general range of each species or subspecies along the
Pacific coast, hoping thereby to ^how more clearly the precise relations in
which the ditlerent forms stand geographically to the Cape fauna."
Acknowledjjmeni is made to his as^i^tant. Mr. Walter Deane, for the
preparation of the bibliography, which includes some seventy titles, and
for preparing the s\nonymy. lie has performed the task, says Mr.
Brewster, '* with infinite care and faithfulness, verifying every citation by
1 Birds of the Cape Region of L>wer California. By William Brewster.
Bull. Mus. (?omp. Zoiil.. Vol. XLl, No. i. pp. 1-J41, with Map. September,
^?iJ^] /?ec*»/ Literature, 79
direct examination of the original text. A fuller Rvnon^'inv has been
given for the thirty* or more birds which appear to be either peculiar to
the region under consideration or especially prominent members of the
fauna The synonymy is intended to serve, at least primarily, merely
as an index to what has been published on the characteristic birds of the
Cape Region, and on the local history only of those which visit it during
migration or in winter, or which breed but casually or very sparingly
within its confines."
The number of species recorded for the region is 167, with 88 additional
subspecies, or a total of 255 forms. Of these four are described as new,
and 36 are recorded for the first time as occurring in the Cape Region.
The new forms are : Totanas melanoleucus frazari^ Megascops xantusi.
Bubo virginianus elachistun^ and Tachycineta thalassina brachyptera.
The latter is mentioned as " an interesting illustration of the recognized
fact that isolated, non-migratory birds are given to having shorter wings
than those which regularly perform extended journeys." Mr. Brewster
had previously described three new species and nine new subspecies from
t-his same collection, which makes sixteen new forms characterized bv
him from the Cape Region, or one half of those recognized as peculiar
to it.
Among the noteworthy points in the present admirable paper is a dis-
cussion of the relationship oi Brackyrhawpkuscrax'eri tind B. hypoleucus^
Mr. Brewster reaching the conclusion that the doubts that have been
expressed as to their specific distinctness are without foundation. The
conclusion is also reached, after the comparison of a large amount of
material, that Buteo borealis lucasauus is not separable from B. b. cal-
urus. Specimens from the Cape St. Lucas region are slightly smaller
than more northern examples of calurus, as would be expected, but " so
far as color and markings are concerned they cannot be separated from
calurus^ Alelauerpcs formicizwrus august i/rons is considered as" speci-
fically^^ distinct " from its nearest allies," but no reasons for this opinion
are here stated. The Cape form of Myiarchus cinerasceus is believed to be
worthy of subspecific recognition, under the name pertiuax applied to it
by Baird in 1859, but it has not of late been considered as separable from
ciufrascens. On the other hand, Mr. Brewster finds that the characters
ascribed to Sayornis nigricans semiatra^ as distinguished from nigricans^
are " too trifling and inconstant to deserve anything more than passing
notice." He agrees with Mr. Ridgway that the so-called Astragalinus
psaltria arixonce is " scarcely a definite form." Ammodramus halophilus
is considered as not separable from A. rostra tus guttaf us, or at least, that
it is premature to give it recognition till we know more about it. Vireo
gilvMS swainsoni is believed to be " a good subspecies." The case of
Hylocickla guttata nana (Aud.) is discussed at length, and the reasons
fully given for the revival of the name nana for the small Hermit Thrush
of the Pacific coast region.
The * Cape Region * of Lower California has long been of special interest,
So Recent Literature. [^^*J
owing to its geographical position and peculiar physical characterittics,
and Mr. Brewster's detailed and painstaking analysis of its bird life is a
most welcome addition not only to the literature of ornithology but to
geographical zo5logy. — J. A. A.
Henshaw^s ' Birds of the Hawaiian Islands/* — The author modestly
says: '^There being at present no popular work upon Hawaiian birds, the
present little volume has been prepared with the view of breaking ground
in this department, and with the hope that it may prove of assistance to
those who are already bird-lovers and, as well, may stimulate others to
become such." While thus avowedly popular in character, it is much out
of the line of ordinary popular bird books, inasmuch as it deals with ques-
tions outside of the usual range of such works. Nearly the first quar-
ter of the book is devoted to such general subjects as the origin of the
Hawaiian avifauna, its peculiar environmental conditions, environmental
changes disastrous to Hawaiian birds, the diseases of Hawaiian birds, the
ornithological knowledge of the natives, the history of ornithological
investigations in the islands, faunal zones, etc. This is followed by
* Part n. Descriptive,* which gives a very full biographical account of
each species, and a description of its external characters. Following this
is a table showing the geographical distribution of the native species by
islands, and an index.
The number of species treated is 125, ^Mncluding residents, migrants
and strays, together with a few that are extinct or practically so." Eleven
species have been introduced into one or more of the islands and have
become more or less firmly established. "There are 60 species of wood-
land Passeres that are endemic and are peculiar to the islands, these being
distinctive! v the Hawaiian Birds."
Notwithstanding the fact that in recent years so much has been done
to make known scientifically the birds of the Hawaiian Islands, through
the great works of Mr. Scott B. Wilson and Mr. Walter Rothschild, and
the lesser writings of other investigators, we have here for the first
time an attempt to place within the reach of the ordinary bird lover a
descriptive list combined with a full account of what is known of their
life histories, based largely on the original observations of the author.
"WMth the exception of a few species," says Mr. Henshaw, "that arc
evidently comparatively recent comers from America, like the Night
Heron, Gallinule, Marsh Hawk, and the Short-eared Owl, Hawaiian
birds are quite unlike any others. They fall naturally into a few groups
of related species, and so different are they from the birds of other lands
that their relationships are traceable only with great difficulty." Accord-
1 Birds of the Hawaiian Islands { being a | Complete List | of the | Birds of
the Hawaiian Possessions | with Notes on their Habits | By | H. W. Henshaw
I — Trice |i.oo I — I Honolulu, H. I. | Thos. (i. Thrum, Publisher. | 1902 -
8vo, pp. 146.
^**™^1 Rectui Literature. 8 1
ing to Dr. Gadou, the greater part of the distinctive I7 Hawaiian birds
belong to the single familj Drepanididse, almost beyond doubt of Amer-
ican origin, and find their nearest relationship in the American familv
Cccrebidae. Thej were probably the first birds to obtain a foothold in the
islands, and later received a few additions from Australia.
Hawaiian birds apparently do not take kindly to innovations, and pre-
fer the virgin forests to the proximity of man. "Unlike many European
and American birds, which flourish in the garden and orchard and find
comfort and safety in man*s protection, none of the island species seem to
desire to be on neighborly terms with man, or to be capable of adapting
themselves to the changes which follow in his wake. For a time they are
content to fly over his clearings and to feed in the forest hard by ; but to
nest by his door and profit by his bounty seem to be foreign to their wild
natures and presently, unable to reconcile themselves to his unwarranted
intrusion into their ancient fastnesses, they retreat to the unvexed and vir.
gin forest." The destruction of the forests, that has followed the invasion
of civilized man, is hemming them into constantly diminishing areas,
"and In a few years the opportunity to study the habits of some of the
unique bird forms which have been developed upon these islands will be
lost forever." Even slight changes in environmental conditions have a
marked influence and species "even l>ecome extinct when the causes seem
wholly inadequate." Mr. Henshaw believes that among the causes of the
decline of certain species is "the necessity of continuous inbreeding," and
gives his reasons at considerable length for this belief, citing examples in
illustration. They are also obviously affected by prolonged storms and
slight changes of temperature, and are also subject to diseases, especially
by the growth of tumours on the feet, and sometimes about the mouth.
These tumours have been found to be of bacillic origin, and are most
prevalent on "the windward side of Hawaii, where the annual rainfall is
from 130 to 180 inches." Apparently fully one tenth of the species of
Hawaiian birds are either extinct or rapidly approaching extinction, or
about one sixth of the distinctively Hawaiian forms.
In referring to the work of Mr. R. C. L. Perkins, who began collecting
in 1892, Mr. Henshaw notes that as his large collections contained but
one new species, we may consider that the list of Hawaiian birds is prac-
tically complete, but the still more important study "of their life histories,
of their relations to each other and to the avifauna of other lands,"
remains as a still more important study. To this end the author's 'Birds
of the Hawaiian Islands ' is an important contribution, as well as an incen-
tive and an aid to future observers. — J. A. A.
Snodg^ass and Heller on the Birds of Clipperton and Cocos Islands. * —
' Papers from the Hopkins Stanford Galapagos Expedition, 1S98-1899. XI.
The Birds of Clipperton and Cocos Islands. By Robert Evans Snodgrass
and Edmund Heller. Proc. Washington Acad, of Sciences, Vol. IV, pp. 501-
520. Sept. 30, 1902.
82 Recent Literature. \!itL.
CHpperton Island lies in latitude lo"*^ 17' north and 109^ 13' weftt, ano
about 600 miles distant from the mainland, the nearest point of which is
the west coast of Mexico, near Acapulco. It is little more than a coral
reef, practically without vegetation, and its land fauna consists of a few
species of sea birds, which resort to it in immense numbers for a breeding
station, a single species of lizard, a dragonfly, a beetle, and a few diptera.
Cocos Island, situated about five degrees further south and some twenty-
two degrees further east, off the west const of Costa Rica, and about 350
miles from the mainhmd, is mountainous and covered with trees and a
dense undergrowth. The plant species are few, however, and the land
fauna consists of a few indigenous birds, a lizard, and a few species of
insects. Though visited by several kinds of water birds, it is not. like
Clippcrton Island, a great breeding resort for sea fowl. Both islands are
described in much detail, and most of the birds obtained at each are
described at length. The birds recorded from both islands number only
15 species, of which only five — all boobies and terns — are recorded from
Clippcrton Island and 10 from Cocos Island, while two are common to
both localities. Two of the species, a tern and a booby, were first described
by the authors of the present paper from specimens taken by them at theiSe
islands. Of the four indigenous land birds found at Cocos, three are
peculiar to the island, two of them having been first- made known by Mr.
A. W. Anthony in 1895. — J. A. A.
Knight's *The Birds of Wyoming.' i — This is a fully annotated and
well illustrated list, based in part on "published reports pertaining to the
birds of the State," partly on unpublished observations of ornithologists
or collectors of Wyoming birds, and partly on collections made especially
for the museum of the University of Wyoming by Mr. Chas. W. Gillmore,
now of the Carnegie Museum. Mr. Knight, being a geologist, makes no
claim to being an ornithologist, and appears to have prepared the work in
response to constant inquiries "for some literature on the birds of the
State," which, as curator of the museum, he felt called upon to furnish.
He is entitled to congratulations on having prepared what seems to be
an excellent list of the birds of Wyoming, which, with the other per-
tinent matter included, forms a ^ Bulletin ' that must be of great assistance
to students of Wyoming birds. The introductory matter includes a r^sum^
of the literature pertaining to the subject. 'A Note on Studying Birds,*
and a reprint of Prof. Laurence Bruner's * Birds in their Relation to
Agriculture," this preliminary matter occupying pp. 1-23, while a supple-
» The Birds of Wyoming. By Wilbur C. Knight. Bulletin No. 55. Wyo-
ming Experiment Station, University of Wyoming, Agricultural College De«
partment, I^ramie, Wyoming. Septemlwir, 1902. Svo, pp. 174, with 48 full-
page half-tone plates and numerous text illustrations. Sent free upon request,
by the Director of the Kxperiment .Station.
^ wf^l R€C€nt Literature: 83
tnent gives the Bird and Game laws of the State. * A Preliminary List of
the Birds of Wyoming, with Notes/ occupies pp. 22-158, recording 288
species and subspecies, to which is added a * Hypothetical List* of 12
species. The annotations relate mainly to the manner of occurrence of
the species, but include also, in the ca^e of the hawks and owls, copious
extracts from Dr. A. K. Fisher's report on the food of hawks and owls,
and in the case of the blackbirds from Prof. F. E. L. BeaPs report on the
food of these birds. The numerous plates, and the illustrations of struc-
tural details in the text, all drawn by Mr. Frank Bond, and here for the
most part first published, add greatly to the usefulness and attractiveness
of this praiseworthy effort to give needed information about the birds of
Wyoming. — J. A. A.
Henninger's List of the Birds of Middle Southern Ohio.^— This list
is based on the observations of the author during the period from August
15, 1894, to July I, 1902, and is the first formal list of the birds of the
region, which is stated to be restricted mainly to Scioto and Pike Counties.
The list numbers 216 species, of which two are introduced, and seven are
considered as * hypothetical * and placed in a separate category. The list
is not put forth as a complete enumeration of the birds of the region, but
as a trustworthy list so far as it goes, each record having been carefully
scrutinized, while most of the species recorded "are represented by speci-
mens in the author^s or local collections." The annotations relate mainly
to relative abundance and the dates of migration. The list is thus a wel-
come and important addition to faunal literature. — J. A. A.
Blatchley^s * A Nature Wooing.' * — The scene of Professor Blatchley's
little book is mainly the vicinity of Ormond, Florida, and consists of
observations, mostly in the form of a journal, on the animal and plant
life of the region visited, being only to a small extent ornithological.
It is v^itten in a popular vein, by a scientific observer, an appendix
of 20 pages giving formal lists of the species of various orders of in-
sects collected, while passim there are numerous references to birds,
reptiles, mollusks, etc. Pages 174-179 give, with illustrations, an account
of the discovery of two humeri of the Great Auk in a shell mound at
Ormond, as already recorded in ♦ The Auk * (XIX, July, 1902, pp. 255-258)
by Dr. O. P. Hay. The volume will afford pleasant reading to nature
lovers, especially those visiting the region to which it relates. — J. A. A.
* A Preliminary List of the Birds of Middle Southern Ohio. By Rev. W. F.
Henninger. The Wilson Bulletin, Vol. IX, No. 3, Sept., 1902, pp. 77-93.
•A Nature Wooing at Ormond by the Sea. By W. S. Blatchley, Author of
* Gleanings from Nature.' Indianapolis : The Nature Publishing Company.
1902. i2mo, pp. 145, with 12 pll., map, and 63 text illustrations. Price, post-
paid^ I1.25.
\
84 Recent Literature \^^
Keyser^s * Birds of the Rockies/ ' — This is a narrative of the author's
experiences in a rather limited portion of Colorado, supplemented by an
annotated list of the birds thus far recorded from the State, based, with due
acknowledgment, on Prof. W. W. Cooke's * The Birds of Colorado.* The
author's field of observation included the immediate vicinity of Pikers Peak,
and other points in the Rockies to the northward and southward, and also
excursions to the foothills and adjoining edge of the Plains to the east-
ward. He evidently enjoyed his experiences with all the enthusiasm of
an ardent bird lover, and recounts them at length in ecstatic phrases for
the entertainment of those of similar ilk who may not have enjoyed his
opportunities. He is often prolix and repetitive in telling of his feelings
under these inspiring surroundings as well as in recording what he taw
and learned in the way of new bird acquaintances, but he is evidently so
sincere and so much in earnest that much can be pardoned. While the
work is not given forth as a record of new discoveries, it cannot fail to be
entertaining and enjoyable to the class to which it most obviously appeals
— the amateur bird lover. The book is beautifully printed and illustrated,
Mr. Horsfall's vignettes and marginal illustrations being very appro-
priate and pleasing. Besides, Mr. Keyser is an intelligent observer, and
has a good general knowledge of his subject. In his opening chapter,
* Up and Down the Heights/ he has something to say of the vertical
migration of birds in the Rockies, and of the faunal differences between
this region and the States to the eastward of the Great Plains, — of the
eastern forms one misses, of the western types that take their places, and
of the representative, slightly differentiated forms that replace familiar
eastern species. In the second chapter, * Introduction to Some Species,*
certain eastern and western forms are compared, and in a pleasant way
much information is conve^'ed that cannot fail to interest and instruct
the average lay reader. The other eleven chapters, under the titles,
*Bald Peaks and Green Vales,* * Birds of the Arid Plain,' 'Over the
Divide and Back,' * A Pretty Hummer,' • A Notable Quartette,' etc., deal
with some particular locality or excursion, or with some particular species
or group of species, so that in the course of the volume most of the com-
mon birds of the region come in for a share of the author's attention.
The colored plates, by Mr. Fuertes, of some of the more characteristic
and striking species, contribute greatly to the general attractiveness of a
book that is well worthy of extended sale, and which occupies a hitherto
somewhat neglected field in the list of popular bird books. — J. A. A.
' Birds of the Rockies | By l.eander Keyser | Author of " In Bird Land,"
etc. I — I With Kight full-page Plates (four in color) | by Louis Agassis
Fuertes ; Many Illustra- | tions in the Text by Bruce Horsfall, and | Eight
Views of Ix)calilies from photographs | — | With a complete Check- | List of
Colorado Birds | [monogram] — | Chicago. A. C. McClurg and Co. | Nineteen
Hundred and Two. — 8vo, pp. i-xviii, -1-19-355, pll. 8 (4 in color), 8 full-
page half-tones, and 30 half-tone marginal text cuts.
^*W ^] Rtctut Littraturt, 85
BoRoughs** * John James Audubon.' ^ — Of the twenty-five * Beacon Biog-
raphies * thus far issued, only two relate to naturalists — Louis Agassiz and
John James Audubon.
The first was very happilj treated by Alice Bache Gould, ' and a more
fitting author for the second could hardly have been found than John
Burroughs, himself an ornithologist and a poet-naturalist, able to weigh
Audubon's work, and to sympathize with his tastes and limbitions. In
the brief preface the author very fairly compares Audubon and Wilson,
their temperaments, opportunities, methods of work and their achieve-
ments. Then follows a * chronology * of the important events in Audu-
bon's life, and a just and very readable r^sum^ of his history, character,
and works, based of course on previously published sources of informa-
tion. He recounts the meeting of Audubon and Wilson at Louisville,
Kentucky, in March, 1810, as told by Audubon himself, and also as briefly
noted by Wilson. There are appropriate and very interesting extracts
from Audubon's journals and other writings, but mainly the biography is
an admirably condensed account of Audubon's life and character. In
comparing Audubon with Wilson he says (preface, p. x) : "Both men
went directly to nature and underwent incredible hardships in exploring
the woods and marshes in quest of their material. Audubon's rambles
were much wider, and extended over a much longer period of time.
Wilson, too, contemplated a work upon our quadrupeds, but did not live
to begin it. Audubon was blessed with good health, length of years, a
devoted and self-sacrificing wife, and a buoyant, sanguine, and elastic
disposition. He had the heavenly gift of enthusiasm — a passionate love
for the work he set out to do. He was a natural hunter, roamer, woods-
man ; as unworldly as a child, and as simple and transparent. We have
had better trained and more scientific ornithologists since his day, but
none ^with his abandon and poetic fervor in the study of our birds."
Again (p. 33): "Wilson was of a nature far less open and generous than
was Audubon. It is evident that he looked upon the latter as his rival,
and was jealous of his superior talents ; for superior they were in many
ways. His drawings have far more spirit and artistic excellence, and his
text shows far more enthusiasm and hearty afliliation with Nature. In
accuracy of observation, Wilson is fully his equal, if not his superior."
Mr. Burroughs does not hesitate to openly question the accuracy of
some of Audubon*s tales of adventure during his early wanderings, some
of. which "sound a good deal like an episode in a dime novel, and may
well be taken with a grain of allowance." Of his bird paintings, he says :
"His bird pictures reflect his own temperament, not to say his nationality;
* John James Audubon. By John Burroughs. The Beacon Biographies of
Eminent Americans. Edited by M. A. DeWolfe Howe. Boston: Small,
Maynard and Company, 1902. i2mo, pp. xxii -f- 144.
« See Auk, Vol. XVIII, 1901, p. 285.
86 Recent Literature, R^jJ
the birds are ver^ demonstrativef even theatrical and melodramatic at
times. In some cases this is all right, in others it is all wrong. Birds
differ in this respect as much as people do — some are verj quiet and
sedate, others pose and gesticulate like a Frenchman. It would not be easy
to exaggerate, for instance, the flashings and evolutions of the redstart
when it arrives in May, or the acting and posing of the catbird, or the
gesticulations of the yellow-breasted chat, or the nervous and emphatic
character of the large-billed water thrush, or the many pretty attitudes of
the great Carolina wren ; but to give the same dramatic character to the
demure little song sparrow, or to the slow moving cuckoo, or to the
pedestrian cowbird, or to the quiet Kentucky warbler, as Audubon hat
done, is to convey a wrong impression of these birds." The coloring, as,
well as the posing, *Ms also often exaggerated." But in view of all that
Audubon accomplished, and often under such adverse conditions, *Mt ill
becomes us," says Mr. Burroughs, "to indulge in captious criticism."
In brief, Mr. Burroughs has well accomplished his task, and placed
within the reach of the many persons interested in the personal history
of the great pioneer painter-naturalist, in a handy and comparatively
inexpensive volume, a concise history of his life, character, and works.
The photogravure portrait serving as frontispiece is from the well-known
painting by Healy, made in 1838, now owned by the Boston Society of
Natural History. — J. A. A.
Strong on the Development of Color in Feathers. — In a paper * of 40
pages, illustrated with 9 plates, Dr. Strong gives a detailed account of his
investigations of the development of color in feathers. The work was
done in the Zoological Laboratory of Harvard University, under the
direction of Dr. E. L. Mark. It was begun in the fall of 1899, and was
continued at intervals for many months, the material used being princi-
pally the remiges of the Common Tern {Sterna htrundo)^ but feather
germs were also used from ^^ Passerina ciris Linn., Passerina cyan^a
Linn., Munia atricapilla Ilumc, and the common dove," and dry feathers
from Cyanocitta crista ta^ Siaiia sialif^ Pitta sordida^ Pitta molmccensis^
Cotinga cayana^ and Mega scops asio. Dr. Strong was well qualified for
the task by his special training in the requisite technique of such investi-
gations, and enjoyed the exceptional advantages of a well equipped
laboratory, famous for its facilities for histological investigation. The
paper is necessarily highly technical, and the results and not the methods
will here receive notice.
A brief introduction is followed by 'II. Methods and Materials \ • III.
The Development of the Feather,' considered under 'A. The Feather
* The Development of Color in the Detiiiitive Feather. By R. M. Strong.
Bulletin Mus. Comp. Zoiil., Vol. XL, No. 3. pp. 146-186, pll. i-ix, October,
1902.
^ tw^] Recent Literature, 87
Germ •; • B. The Differentiation of the Feather,' as (1) the barbules, (2) the
barbicels, (3) the barb, (4) the rhachis, (5) the residual cells, (6) the corni-
fication and withdrawal of the feather. *IV. The Production of Color in
the Feather'; * V. The Pigmentation of the Feather*; under which are
considered, (A) the chemical nature of feather pigments, (B) the origin of
pigment, and (C) the distribution of pigment in feathers. • VI. Change
of Color without Molt ' ; ' VII. Summary ' ; and * Bibliography.*
In his introduction the author says : "A theory of change of cftlor with-
out molt was the subject of a rather warm controversy about the middle
of the nineteenth century, and there has been something of a revival of
the discussion in the last few years. It has seemed to me that a solution
of the problem could not be attained without a thorough consideration of
the causes of color and its development."
Under * VI. Change of Color without Molt,* he states: "The changes
in color claimed by many writers to occur without molt may be grouped
under two heads: (i) the destructive, and (2) the constructive. Under
destructive changes are included the results of abrasion and physical
disintegration. Constructive changes include supposed regeneration and
rearrangement of pigment.** Then follows a reference to the recent
writers on the subject, who have claimed change of color without molt,
of which he says: "Descriptions of repigmentation have been mostly
pure speculation. Within a few years the following remarkable expla-
nation of the pigmentation of the feather has been given by Keeler ('93) **:
which he then quotes. He cites the still more recent work of Birtwell,
from whom he quotes concerning the supposed rearrangement of the
melanin granules in the feathers of the Indigo Bunting; and also quotes
Chadboume*s argument for a so-called vital connection of the feather
with the organism. After noting the claims of these and other authors,
and explaining to some extent the sources of their errors, he says : "There
is no satisfactory evidence of the occurrence of repigmentation ....
"Pigmentation takes place, as has been shown, at a \^\'y early stage in
the differentiation of the feather, when the cells composing its fundament
are in an active condition and in intimate relation with sources of nu-
trition. In the case of melanin pigments, there are branched pigment
cells which supply pigment in the form of rod-shaped granules directly to
the feather fundament. The contention for a flow of pigment from the
barbs into the barbules, etc. (Keeler), is at once made absurd by the fact
that the barbules are pigmented before the barbs are difierentiatedA
"Variations in color patterns are usually correlated with variations in
the distribution of pigment in the earlier stages of the feather's develop-
ment. When completed, the feather is composed of cells which have
been entirely metamorphosed into a firm horny substance and its pigment
is imbedded in that lifeless matter. The cells composing a barbule are
fused into a solid, more or less homogeneous structure. The pigment 0/
one portion of the barbule is as effectually isolated from that of another as
* Not italicized in the original.
88 Rectfti Literature. [J^jJ
is the coloring of various parts of a piece of agate} Likewise in the barb
and rhachis, pigment 18 definitely and permanently located either in the
solid cortex or in effectually separated cells of the medulla; and there are
no pores large enough to admit the passage of melanin granules. The
characteristic longitudinal arrangement of melanin granules, which one
finds at the close of comification of the feather, is permanent ....
*' When the feather is completed, the dermal pulp possesses no func-
tional connection with it ; the barbs and barbules are then practically
isolated from the vital processes of the organism and have no further
power of growth.
" The arguments against change of color without molt through repig-
mentation or regeneration may be summed up as follows :
'* I. Most feather pigments are too resistant to chemical reagents to
warrant belief in their solution and redistribution.
*' 2. Pigmentation of the feather has been observed to take place only
in the younger stages of the feather germ.
*' 3. At the end of comification melanin granules have a definite
arrangement, which is permanent.
" 4. When comification has ensued, the various elements of the feather
are hard, more or less solid, structures and their pigment contents are
effectually isolated from one another. ,
" 5. There is no satisfactory evidence of the occurrence of repigmen-
tation, and all the histological conditions render such an event highly
improbable."
The results of his histological studies on the formation and growth of
the feather, the differentiation of the various parts of its structure, the
origin and supply of pigment to the feather, etc., are summarized in six-
teen numbered paragraphs at the close of the paper, from which we quote
the following :
*' 15. Before comification has ceased, all the pigment which the feather
is ever to receive has been supplied to the cells composing its fundament
[the growing base of the feather].
^* 16. Changes in the color of plumage may take place (i) by a molt,
during which the new feathers may have the same pigmentation as their
predecessors or a different one ; (2) by a loss of certain portions of the
feather ; or (3) by physical disintegration in the cortex of the feather as
the result of exposure. There is no satisfactory evidence of a process of
repigmentation, and the histological conditions of the feather render such
a process highly improbable."
Dr. Strong's paper is one of the most noteworthy ornithological papers
of the year, and should go far toward the settlement of the much dis-
cussed que»ition of the repigmentation of feathers. We have here the
results of an impartial investigation by an expert histologist, In opposi-
tion to speculation and conjecture, put forth by persons untrained in
modern histological methods. — J. A. A.
^ Not italicized in the original.
^Iw^J Recent Littraiure, 89
Publications Received. — Bailey, Florence Merrlam. Handbook of
Birds of the Western United States, iimo, pp. xc + 512, pll. 33, and
600 text figures. ' Houghton, Mifflin & Co. Price, $3.50, net.
Bangs, Outram, Description of a New Thrush from Chiriqui. (Proc.
N. Engl. Zool. Club, HI, pp. 91, 92.)
Blatchley, W. S. A Nature Wooing at Ormond bj the Sea. i2nio,
pp. 245, 12 pll. and 62 text illustrations. The Nature Publishing Co.,
Indianapolis. Price, postpaid, $1.25.
Brewster, William. Birds of the Cape Region. (Bull. Mus. Comp.
Zool., Vol. XLI, No. I, pp. 241 and map.)
Finsch, O. (i) Ueber zwei neue Vogelarten von Java. (Notes from the
Lejden Museum, Vol. XXIII, 1902, pp. 147-152.) (2) Ueber Dicteum
sclluiians Hartert. (Ibid.^ pp. 153-155. ) (3) Ueber zwei bisher verkannte
Arten : Cemtropus nigrorufus (Cuv.) und C. grilU Hartl. (Ibid,^ pp. 156-
161.) (4) Zur Versohnung Zweier toten Meister. (Hartlaub-Pet^nyi).
(Joum. f. Orn., 1902, pp. 349-356.)
Oirtanner, A. Eine zerst5rte Kolonie des Alpenseglers, Afu$ melba
(L.). (Orn. Monatsschr., XXVII, 1902, pp. 376-388.)
Henshaw, H. W. Birds of the Hawaiian Islands. 8vo, pp. 146. Thomas
G. Thrum, Honolulu, 1902. Price, $1.00.
Kellog, V. L., and B. L. Chapman. Mallophaga from Birds of the
Pacific Coast of North America. (Journ. New York Ent. Soc, Vol. X,
pp. 20-28, pi. iii.) . ^
Kellog, Vernon L., and Shinkai I. Kuwana. Mallophaga from Birds.
(Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci., Vol. IV, pp. 457-499* pH. xxviii-xxxi.)
Kern, Margaret. Vesper Sparrow; or, What the Birds Say. i2mo.
pp. 240. J. S. Ogilvie Publishing Co., New York. Price, $1.00.
Knight, Wilbur C The Birds of Wyoming. (Bull. No. 55, Wyoming
Experiment Station, Laramie, Wyo.) 8vo, pp. 174, numerous half-tone
plates and text illustrations. Sent free on application to the Director,
Experiment Station, Laramie, Wyo.
Keyser, Leander. Birds of the Rockies. 8vo, pp. i-i8-f I9-35S» P*^* 8
(4 in color), and many text illustrations. A. C. McClurg and Co.,
Chicago, 1902. Price, $3.00, net, $3.20, delivered.
Richmond, Charles W. Birds collected by Dr. W. L. Abbott and Mr.
C. B. Kloss in the Anadaman and Nicobar Islands. (Proc. U. S. Nat.
Mus., XXV, No. 1288, pp. 287-314.)
Sage, John H. Spring Migration. Average dates of arrival of Birds
within fifteen miles of Hartford, Conn. Prepared for the Hartford Sci-
entific Society, 1902. i6mo, 12 pp.
Shufeldt, R. W. Some United States Partridges. (Baily's Mag. of
Sports and Pastimes, Oct. 1902, pp. 251-255.)
Snodgrass, Robert Evans, and Edmund Heller. The Birds of Clipper-
ton and Cocos Islands. (Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci., Vol. IV, pp. 501-520.)
Strong, R. M. (i) The Development of Color in the Definitive Feather.
(Bull. Mus. Comp. Zo51., Vol. XL, No. 3, pp. 147-186, pll. i-ix.) (2) A
Case of Abnormal Plumage. (Biol. Bull., Vol. Ill, pp. 289-294.)
QO A'or€S a ma News. LjjJ
Trowbridge, C. C. Tlie Relation of Wind to Bird Migration. (Am.
Nat., Vol. XXXVI, 1902, pp. 735-753-)
Tschusi zu SchmidhofTen, Vict. Ritter v. Ueber palaearktische Fomien.
(Orn. Jahrb., 1902, pp. 234, 235).
American Ornithology, II, Nos. 10-12, Oct.-Dec., 1902.
Anales del Mus. Nac. de Montevideo, IV, Pt. i, 1902.
Annals of Scottish Natural History, No. 44, Oct. 1902.
Aquila, IX, 1902.
Audubon Calendar for 1903, Massachusetts Audubon Society.
Bird-Lore, Nos. 5, 6, 1902.
Birds and Nature, XII, Nos. 3-5, 1902.
Bulletin Brit. Orn. Club, XII, Nos. XCI, XCII, Oct.-Nov., 1902.
Canadian Record of Science, VIII, No. 8, July, 1902.
Condor, The, IV, Nos. 5, 6, 1902.
Emu, The, II, No. 2, Oct. 1902.
Forest and Stream, LIX, Nos. 13-26, 1902.
Journal Maine Orn. Soc, IV, No. 4, Oct. 1902.
Knowledge, XXV, Nos. 204-206, Oct.-Dec, 1902.
Naturalist, The, A Month. Journ. Nat. Hist, for North of England,
Nos. 549-551, Oct.-Dec, 1902.
Ornithologische Monatsberichte, X, Nos. 10-12, Oct.-Dec, 1902.
Omithologische Monatsschrift, XXVII, Nos. 9-10, Sept.-Oct., 1903.
Omithologisches Jahrbuch, XIII, Heft 5, 6, Sept.-Dec, 1902.
Ottawa Naturalist, XVI, Nos. 7-9, Oct.-Dec, 1902.
Our Animal Friends, XXX, Nos. 2-4, Oct.-Dec, 1902.
Proceedings Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, pt. 2, 1902.
Proceedings Indiana Acad. Nat. Sci., 1901 (1902).
Science, N. S., XVI, Nos. 40^-416, 1902.
Wilson Bulletin, The, IX, No. 3, Sept. 1902.
Zo5logist, The, (4), V, Nos. 70-72, Oct.-Dec, 1902.
NOTES AND NEWS.
Dr. Jamks Ci'siiiNCi Mkrrill, a Fellow of the American Ornitholo-
gists' Union, died at his home in Washin^^ton, D. C, on October 27, 1902.
He was born March 23, 1853, in Cninbridjje, Massachusetts, where hit
boyhood was spent and the earlier part of his education obtained. He
afterwards attended school in Cicrniany, and on returning to this countrjr
entered the Medical Department of the University of Pennsylvania, from
which he was graduated in 1874. Al>out a year later he was appointed
Assistant Surgeon in the United States Army. For manj jears after this
he was stationed at various military posts in the West and Southwest,
where be devoted most of his leisure time to studying and collecting birds
and their nests and eggs. He also collected insects, especially beetles,
and to some extent mammals and fishes, and he was an ardent sportsman
and hunter of big game. Nearly all of his specimens were given to per-
sonal friends or to museums, the greater part of the bird skins going to
Mr. Brewster's collection, and most of the nests and eggs to the National
Museum.
On November i6, 1892, Dr. Merrill was married to Mary Pitt Chase of
Maryland, and on March 13, 1894, he was made a full Surgeon with the
rank of Major. Three years later (April i, 1897) he was appointed Libra-
rian of the Surgeon General's Office at Washington. Here he spent the
remainder of his days, performing, with his accustomed steadfastness and
ability, tasks irksome to a man of his temperament, and so ytry arduous
and confining that by degrees his health gave way under the strain. He
kept steadily at his work, however, until within a few months of his
death, although in the summer of 1902 he was induced to spend a few
weeks at White Sulphur Springs, Virginia, in the vain hope that the rest
and change might do him permanent good.
Tyv. Merrill was elected an Active Member of the American Ornitholo-
gists' Union at its first Congress in 1883. He was intensely loyal to its
interests and universally beloved and respected by its members, for he had
rare personal charm and marked ability as a naturalist, although his
extreme modesty prevented him from undertaking tasks and attaining
honors to which he might otherwise have successfully aspired. He was
by no means uninterested in purely technical matters of science and fully
qualified, both by nature and training, for dealing with them effectively,
but his published writings relate almost exclusively to personal field
observations on the habits and distribution of western birds and mammals.
They are not numerous but their quality is of the first order, for he was
an exceptionally accurate and intelligent observer as well as a pleasing
and finished writer. His more important ornithological papers are: —
* Notes on the Ornithology of Southern Texas, being a list of birds
observed in the vicinity of Fort Brown, Texas, from February, 1876, to
June, 1878 * (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. I, 1878, pp. 1 18-173) 5 'Notes on the
Birds of Fort Klamath, Oregon. With remarks on certain species by
William Brewster' (Auk, Vol. V, 1888, pp. 139-146, 251-262, 357-366) ;
and ' Notes on the Birds of Fort Sherman, Idaho' (Auk, Vol. XIV, 1897,
PP- 347-357 ; Vol. XV, 1898, pp. 14-22).
In accordance with a standing order of the Union respecting deceased
Fellows, a special memorial of his life and work will be presented at the
next Congress of the American Ornithologists' Union, and published
later in * The Auk.' — W. B.
92 Notes and News, [^^J
Dr. Emil Holub, a Corresponding Fellow of the American Ornitholo-
gists* Union, died at Vienna, Februarjr 31, 1902, in the 55th jear of his
age. For the following notice of the life and work of this well-known
African traveller and collector we are indebted to *The Ibis * (July, 1902,
p. 521).
*' Dr. Holub was a native of Bohemia and of Czech descent. He was
educated as an apothecary, but emigrated early to South Africa, and
practised as a doctor at Kimberly and elsewhere. His original induce-
ment to penetrate into the far interior of the country was his ardent taste
for natural history, especially ornithology, to the pursuit of which his
first seven years of travel were mainly devoted. His journeys were
described in his * Sieben Jahre in Stid-Afrika' (Wien, 1881), a work which
was translated into English and published in London. In conjunction
with the late Freiherr v. Pelzeln, the collection of birds made on this
occasion was described by him in a volume entitled * Beitriige zur Orni-
thologie Sudafrikas ' (Vienna, 1882). Dr. Holub subsequently returned
to South Africa, and made a more extended expedition into the Marotse
and Mashukulumbe countries north of the Zambesi, now forming part of
Northern Rhodesia. During his four years' wanderings on this occasion
(1883-87) a large collection of native arms and implements, as well as of
natural objects, was made, and was exhibited at Vienna on his return to
Europe. This journey was described in his work * Von der Capstadt ins
Land der Maschukulumbe* (2 vols., Vienna, 1890)."
Chester Barlow, a Member of .the American Ornithologists* Union,
and one of the best known of the younger ornithologists of this country,
died at Mountain View, Santa Clara County, California, Nov. 6, 1902.
Death resulted from an incurable form of tuberculosis and took place
after a few weeks of marked debilitation and but a few days of final
confining sickness. Interment was made at Mountain View in the
presence of a large nuinl>er of friends* prominent among whom were
many members of the Cooper Ornithological Club of which Mr. Barlow
was a founder and the Secretary for nine years.
Although but 28 years of age he had accomplished much for ornithology,
and the position which he held among his fellows in California and
among the -younger ornithologists throughout the country was unique.
He was a thoroughly self-made man, and the large degree of popularity
which he enjoyed was due to sterling qualities combined with a loving
disposition and an imprcsKionablc nature. He was educated in the com-
mon schools of Santa Clara, California, and immediately after gradua-
tion took a position as a clerk in the Santa Clara Valley Bank. Indeed,
while still in school he helped support his widowed mother by assisting
with the accounts at this l)ank in spare hours, having begun his career as
stable boy for one of its senior officers. His ability and integrity soon
won promotion, and in the course of a few years he became assistant
cashier and later was elected a meml)er of the l)oard of directors. He
was married Oct. 15. 1899, to Miss Jeannette Nicholls of Santa Clara,
^*?w ^] A^<?/e5 and News, 93
and his home life was a very happj one. He spent all his leisure in the
woods and fields indulging his love for the birds and things of nature,
showing an energetic spirit and a rare enthusiasm. He knew the haunts
of all the birds near his home in the Santa Clara Vallejr, and though his
time was much occupied hy business, he seldom failed to contrive a way
to obtain a daily hour or two in the field during the spring and summer
months. He was a careful and discriminating collector and a very ardent
advocate of bird protection. He was also an enthusiastic and successful
photographer, being one of the first in this country to obtain good
pictures of birds in their haunts. Although having no special education,
and making no profession of wide knowledge of technical ornithology,
in his short career he unquestionably accomplished more for the advance-
ment of bird study in California than any other one man has done. He
was preeminently a man of action — a man who obtained results. He is
entitled to all the credit for the original organization and much of
the subsequent prosperity of the Cooper Ornithological Club. To his
enterprise and foresight was due the birth of the Club^s 'Bulletin/
later *The Condor,' and to his unfailing industry and vigilance, its
recognized position at present as the best ornithological journal of its
class in the world. As secretary of this club and as editor of * The Con-
dor * he became quite widely known, and his correspondence was exceed-
ingly voluminous; and such was the charm of his nature that many who
had never seen him learned to love him through the hearty, sympathetic,
and likewise virile letters that he wrote them. It was his dearest wish to
visit the eastern States to meet some of his correspondents and attend a
congress of the A. O. U., and had he lived he would have done so as soon
as circumstances permitted. As it is, those who mourn him are on both
sides of the continent, and those to whom his death is almost like that of
a brother are not a few. — W. H. O.
LuDWiG KuMLiEN, an associate of the American Ornithologists' Union,
died at his home in Milton, Wisconsin, Dec. 4, 1902, after long suffering
from cancer of the throat, in the 50th year of his age. He was a son of
the late Thure Kumlien, one of the pioneer naturalists of Wisconsin, and a
valued correspondent of Baird, Brewer, Cassin and Lawrence, and was born
at Sumner, Wisconsin, March 15, 1853. He was educated at the Albion
Academy and the University of Wisconsin, and at the time of his death
was Professor of Physics and Natural History in Milton College, to which
he was chosen in 1891. He was for a time an assistant in the United
States Fish Commission, and a special agent of Fisheries for the Tenth
Census, and previously naturalist of the Howgate Polar Expedition, spend-
ing two years in the Arctic regions, and forming very important col-
lections in various departments of natural history. 1 1 is report as
naturalist of the expedition was published in 1879, forming Bulletin No.
15 of the U.S. National Museum (8vo, pp. 179), entitled 'Contributions to
94 M?/e.« and N€w$, [JjjJ
the Natural History of Arctic America made in connection with the How-
gate Polar Expedition, 1S77-78' (Birds, pp. 69-105). He contributed to
the late G. Brown Goode's * North American Food Fishes/ and to
various other publications of the Fish Commission, particularly in
reference to the fishes of the Great Lakes, and was for a time employed in
scientific work at the Milwaukee Public Museum. He was an occasional
contributor of notes and short papers on ornithology to * The Auk,' *The
Nidologist,' * Forest and Stream,' and other natural history publications,
but his most important ornithological publication was his report on the
birds of the Howgate Expedition. He was married in 1893 to Miss
Anabelle Carr, who, with three young children, survives him.
Curtis Clay Young, an Associate of the American Ornithologists^
Union since 1891, died at Port Daniel, Province of Quebec, Canada, July
30, 1902. He was born in New York City, November 2, 1874, and was
preparing at the Brooklyn Latin School to enter the Lawrence Scientific
School of Harvard University when forced by ill health to abandon
further formal study. His love of ornithology became his chief interest,
and remained so until his death. In spite of increasing physical disability
he made collecting trips to Port Daniel, Qt^iebec, to Dutch Guiana, the
Island of Trinidad, and the Bahamas. He was also a member of the
Linna^an Society of New York, and of the Brooklyn Institute. His
collection of birds, numbering about 800 skins and 400 sets of eggs, is to
be placed in the museum of Vassar College. — W. F.
Perry O. Simons, widely known as an energetic and careful col-
lector of birds and mammals, and for several years past employed by
the British Museum to collect in western Mexico and in western South
America, was assassinated by his native guide near Cuevas, Argentina,
about the end of December, 1901. Through his career as a collector he
accomplished so much for the promotion of science that it seems desirable
to place on record in 'The Auk' some account of his life and services.
For the following biographical sketch we are indebted to his brother, Mr.
Luther B. Simons, of Maywood, Nebr., who for several years assisted
his brother in his work in South America, and who has kindly furnished
the facts here given in response to our solicitation.
Mr. Simons was born at Mineral Point, Wisconsin, October 6, 1869,
where he spent his boyhood on a farm, and took great pleasure in hunting,
fishing, and trapping. In 1S86 he left his Wisconsin home and went to
Riverside, California. lie always had a fondness for books, and a
strong desire to secure an education. He was graduated from the River-
side High School in 1H93, and the following year entered Stanford Uni-
versity. He spent four years in Stanford, his special course being
eleitrical engineering. During the summer vacations he visited the
mountains of California and Arizona, with other Stanford students, to
hunt, fish, and collect specimens of birds and mammals, and soon became
^"w^ ] ^'^'^^ "^ ^^*- 95
an expert collector. In 1896-97 he was employed by Mr. W. W. Price to
collect in Mexico. He left San Francisco November 35, 1896, accompanied
hy his brother, for Mazatlan, Mexico, and the next ten months were spent
In collecting in the States of Sinaloa and Durango. The collection of
mammals was purchased by the British Museum, and gave such satis-
faction that Mr.^01dfield Thomas, the Curator of Mammals, soon engaged
Mr. Simons for a three years collecting trip to the Andean region of South
America. He was again accompanied by his brother. They left San
Francisco September 28, 1898, on the steamer * City of Sidney.* Work
was begun at Guayaquil, Ecuador, and after collecting for some time at
various points near the coast, the brothers crossed the Andes by way of
Mount Chimborazo, and camped for some time at Riobamba. **From
Rtobamba," to quote from Mr. Luther B. Simons' s letter, "we went down
the Rio Chambo as far Rio Topo; then returning to Riobama we traveled
southward, visiting Cuenca and Loja, two prominent cities in the high-
lands of Ecuador. Leaving Ecuador we entered Peru, traversed the
desert of Piura and Sechura, and passed on down the arid coast to
Lambayeque, and thence inland to Cajamarca. Here we were detained by
a revolution, and witnessed a big battle, but were not molested.
"From Cajamarca to Lima we traveled partly in the high Andes and
partly along the desert coast, there being not a single trail through the
interior of Peru, the country is so broken by deep caf^ons. From Lima
we crossed the Andes by the Lima and Oroya Railroad and made a large
collection on the Rio Perene. We then returned to Lima and took passage
by steamer for Mollendo, the southern port of Peru. Here we made
small collections and then passed on to Arequipa, Puno, Lake Titicaca,
and Santo Domingo. After a month's stay at Santo Domingo we re-
turntrd to Puno and shipped what specimens we had, and then took pas-
sage on the steamer *Coya' for La Paz, Bolivia. From this point we
went into the interior, to a place called Mapiri, on the upper Madra de
Dios River.
" We had now been absent two years, which was longer than I had
agreed to remain with the expedition, and after making a thorough col-
lection at this point I bade my brother a sad farewell, returned with the
specimens to La Paz, and then to Mollendo, sailing thence for San
Francisco. My brother had intended to hire some native assistants, but
later decided to travel alone. For a year longer he prosecuted his work
very successfully, collecting at many points in southern Bolivia and the
northern border of Chili. From Antofagasta he went by steamer to
Valparaiso, and then by rail to Mendoza, Argentina, collecting at various
points in Chili and Argentina. The last letter I received from him was
written at Mendoza, December 15, 1901. From information I have
received from the British Consul General at Valparaiso, he had dispatched
his collecting chest, tent, etc., from a place called Puente del Luca to Val-
paraiso, and had attempted to cross the Andes on foot to Los Andes,
Chili, with a native guide, who, when near a place called Cuervas, Argen-
^6 Aotes and News, Flj?
tina, i8 supposed to have struck him on the back of the head with a
* penca/ or loaded knot at the end of a rein, and then to have driven a
spike through his forehead. His bodj was found and buried near where
the tragedy occurred. The murderer, whose motive was robbery, is now
in prison at Mendoza."
Mr. Simons collected birds as well as mammals, sending large collections
of the former to the British Museum, but upon which no formal report
appears to have yet been published.
Mr. Thomas has described many new species, as well as several new
genera of mammals collected by Mr. Simons during his three years* work
in western South America, where he collected at numerous points, both
on the coast and at high altitudes in the Andes, from southern Ecuador
to northern Argentina. This notice of Mr. Simons may be fittingly
closed by the following brief but emphatic tribute from Mr. Thomas pub-
lished in the ' Annals and Magazine of Natural History * for April, 1902
(p. 237 footnote) : ** While this paper is in press news has been received
that Mr. Simons, the most succes^ul mammal collector that I have ever
had to deal with, has fallen a victim to his intrepidity, and has been mur-
dered by a guide when crossing the Andes alone with him. Brave to a
fault, cheery and enthusiastic, fond of a wild life, successful as a trapper,
painstaking, systematic, and extraordinarily rapid in his work, Mr.
Simons was the perfection of a collector, and we shall not easily find hit
like again. I shall hope to publish later a summary of his Andean
journeys and their scientific results."
During the absence of Mr. Otto Widmann, of Old Orchard, Mo., on a
visit to Germany during the past summer, his house was burned and with
it the greater part of his library and his manuscripts, including hi«
twenty-five years' observations on birds, and the manuscripts of his
nearly completed work on the birds of Missouri. Under this terrible dis-
couragement he can feel sure of the deep sympathy of his fellow orni-
thologists; whose respect and esteem he has gained by his many contribu-
tions to American ornithology, and through personal acquaintance. It is
to be hoped that Mr. Widinann's great loss will not prevent his placing
before the ornithological world the results of his long experience in a
comparatively little known field.
A NKW work on the * Birds of Ohio,' by William Leon Dawson, with
introduction and analvtical kevs hv Lvnds Jones, is announced bv the
Whoaton Publishing Company of Columbus, Ohio, for publication in
September. 1903. The work will l>e a royal octavo of about 500 pages,
with So coloritype and about 200 half-tone plates, the latter illustrating;
the "habitats or favorite haunts of each bird resident of Ohio,'* as well
as many photographic representations of live birds. It will be sold only
by subscription, at from $5.00 to $750, according to the style of binding
^*i9o^^] ^^**^ ^^^ News. 97
Respecting the long delayed new edition of the late Dr. Coues's ' Key
to North American Birds,^ we have received the following circular of
information from the publishers, which we feel sure will interest all
readers of *Thc Auk/
*' Messrs. Dana Estes & Co. announce that the fifth revised edition of
the ' Key to North American Birds/ bjr Dr. Elliott Coues, so long and
patiently awaited by the public, will be ready in the spring of 1903. The
reason for the unusual delay in its publication may be briefly stated.
When Dr. Coues died in 1899 he left the manuscript wholly finished, but
the copy was rendered hard to decipher without the exercise of most
intelligent care by reason of innumerable interlineations, erasures, ab-
breviations, 'riders,* and detached notes, written in a minute, and some-
times difficult handwriting. It was evident that had the Doctor lived he
would have cast his material, although completed as he left it, into a form
which would present fewer difficulties to the compositor. His sudden
death left the copy in such shape that the task of revision and preparation
for the press required double the amount of work that had been anticipated.
The publishers, however, have had the good fortune to obtain the services
of a thoroughly equipped ornithologist, who has read the proof with the
most painstaking care, which has been ably supplemented by the efforts
of a number of professional proof readers. The result is a book which
Y>T, Coues would have been proud to own as the crowning work of his
life. The publishers announce it as being absolutely authoritative and
definitive, and express confidence that it is entirely free from errors of
statement or form.
"Some of the features which will make the Vork more than ever in-
dispensable to ornithologists, professional as well as amateur, may be
briefly summarized :
"i. The detailed, careful descriptions of species — as in former * Keys.*
"2. The accounts, much fuller than in former editions, of the breeding
habits of birds — dates, nests, and particularly the detailed description of
eggs, with careful measurements of same.
"3. The full collation in the text (not in an appendix as in former
editions) of the nomenclature of species in the * Key,* with the nomencla-
ture and numeration of the American Ornithologists* Union Check-List.
"(4) The full synonymies and bibliographical references in the case of
nearly all species — a new feature of the * Key,* and invaluable to students
of all degrees of advancement. To the preparation of this important
feature of the last edition of his * Key,' Dr. Coues brought his rare gifts
as bibliographer and nomenclator. The painstaking character of this
work makes it possible for the student to extend with ease his researches
in the case of a great many species.
"(5) The professional discussion of questions of classification and
nomenclature by perhaps the most eminent of modern ornithologists.
"(6) The introductory (/.«., general) descriptions of ordinal, family,
and other groups, are much amplified over those in preceding editions of
98 Notes and News, [J*
the * Key,* being of a broad scope, which make plain the comparative
relationships of North American families, genera, and species of Mrds,
with extralimital forms (Old World and neotropical). This broad treat-
ment makes of the ' Key ' more than the merely faunal work which Ha
title would imply — /.e., while it is still emphatically a 'Key to North
American Birds,* it contains, more than ever in the past, much general
information in regard to birds.
"(7) An invaluable feature of preceding editions — the scholarly ex-
planation of the etymology of scientific names — is retained, and will
continue to make the * Key' unique among works of its class.
•'Throughout the * Key * — in all departments, life histories, de-
scriptions, etc. — Dr. Coues*s famous descriptive powers are fully dis-
played as in the past."
' London Birds and other Sketches/ by J. Digby Pigott, is announced
by Edward Arnold (37 Bedford St., London), a large crown octavo, with
photogravure illustrations. It includes, besides several chapters on Lon-
don birds and London insects, sketches of the * Birds of the Outer Fames,*
*• The Shetlands in the Birds'-nesting Season/ * Haunts of the Shearwater,*
* In Dutch Water Meadows,* etc.
' Bird-Lore *s * plans for 1903 include an article on the first (1873) edition
of Coues*8 * Key * by its financial sponsor Prof. F. W. Putnam which will
doubtless contain some interesting historical details, and, in view of the
proposed publication this spring of the revised, two-volume edition of the
' Key * will be especially interesting. The article will be accompanied by
photographically reproduced pages of proof of the systematic portion of
the • Key,* with corrections and characteristic annotations by Dr. Coties.
* Bird-Lore* also proposes to publish the photographs of the fifty odd
prominent ornithologists forming its Advisory Council and this series,
in connection with the group photographs of the Founders of the Ameri-
can Ornithologists' Union, members of the Nuttall Club, and of the
Delaware Valley Ornithological Club, will indeed make this magazine an
album of American Ornithologists. The February number will contain
an article by Mr. A. J. Campbell of Melbourne, author of *Nest8 and Eg]gt
of Australian Birds,* on the Mound-building birds of Australia, with, we
believe, the first photographs of the singular structures erected by these
birds to be published in this country.
Among the minor Ornithological Clubs, good work has been done at
London, Ont., by the * Ornithological Section of the Entomological
Section of Ontario.* At the recent annual meeting of the Entomological
Society held in that city the name of the * Ornithological Section * was
changed to * The Mcllwraith Ornithological Club.* This was done at
the request of the members of the Club, who wished to acknowledge the
indebtedness of Canadian ornithologists to Mr. Thomas McIIwraith of
Hamilton, one of the founders of the A. O- U. and the oldest as well as
the foremost Canadian in the science.
The papers read at the meetings of the McIIwraith Club are usually
published in the ' Ottawa Naturalist/ but a few have appeared in * The
Auk.' The officers of the Club are : Chairman, J. E. Keay ; Secretary W.
E. Saunders.
The Third Annual Confsrbncb of the Audubon Societies was held
in Washington November 19 and ao, in connection with the A. O. U.
Congress, a joint meeting of the Audubon Society delegates and the
American Ornithologists' Union being held on the morning of Decem-
ber 20, to hear the report of the Chairman of the A. O. U. Committee on
Bird Protection, and an address by Dr. T. S. Palmer on the results of the
enforcement of the Federal law for the protection of birds. A public
meeting of the Aududon Society delegates was held on the evening of the
19th, and the annual business meeting on the evening of the 20th. Dele-
gates were present from sixteen of the different State Societies. At the
public meeting a number of formal papers were read relating to various
phases of the work of bird protection, and at the business meeting the
special work to be undertaken by the National Committee of Audubon
Societies was outlined, this including an attempt to secure the passage of
proper laws for the protection of birds in a number of States which have
thus far failed to take such action. A Committee was also appointed,
consisting of William Dutcher, Frank M. Chapman, T. S. Palmer, and
Witmer Stone, to examine the sample stock of wholesale millinery dealers,
with a view to systematic and intelligent cooperation between the whole-
sale millinery trade and the Audubon Societies. Mr. Dutcher was re-
elected Chairman of the National Committee, and funds were guaranteed
to defray the cost of employing a clerical assistant to enable the Chairman
to carry on the arduous duties that are inseparable from this important
position. The educational side of bird protection work was deemed of
the highest importance, and steps were taken to bring the Societies in
closer touch through cooperative publication of educational leaflets and
the establishment of a bureau for the exchange of lantern slides for use in
lectures on bird protection.
In furtherance of this plan the Chairman has prepared the following :
*' APPEAL FOR BIRD NEGATIVES.
" One of the most effective methods of educational work employed by
the Audubon Societies is the illustrated lecture.
" Very few of the Societies, however, have been able to secure illustra-
tions owing either to lack of means or of suitable negatives from which
to make slides.
I OO Notes and News. {j^.
" The National Committee thinks it so important that all of the Societies
should have a number of bird lectures continuously in use that it appeals
to the members of the A. O. U. who have bird negatives which they have
ceased to use, to contribute them to the National Committee in order that
slides may be made from them and furnished to the several societies,
without cost.
" Negatives of any species of wild North American birds will be
accepted.
** Acknowledgment of all contributions will be made in * Bird-Lore,*
the official organ of the Audubon Societ es.
William Dutcher,
Ckairman National Committee
of Audubon Societ iesV
As shown by the report of the Chairman of the A. O. U. Committee on
Bird protection, published elsewhere in this number of * The Auk,* very
satisfactory progress has been made the past year in securing better laws
for the protection of birds, and a better enforcement of those already
enacted, and the great extension and important influence of the work of
the Aududon Societies.
^^jjj^'^] DuTCHKR, Report of Committee on Bird Protection. lOI
SUPPLEMENT.
REPORT OF THE A. O. U. COMMITTEE ON THE
PROTECTION OF NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS.
BY WILLIAM DUTCHER, CHAIRMAN.
Plates III- VL
I have considered the birds ;
And I find their life good,
And better the better understood. — George McDonald.
The Scottish poet struck the keynote of bird protection when
he said, the more we study the life of birds the better we under-
stand them, and he intimates that it is impossible to find anything
that is not good in bird life.
Nearly a score of years since one of the Fellows of our Society,
the late George B. Sennelt, first called the attention of ornitholo-
gists to the rapid disappearance of our non-game birds, especially
the water birds, owing to their use as millinery ornaments, this
fashion having then assumed alarming proportions.
As the result of his alarm note, the original A. O. U. Bird Pro-
tection Committee was organized in 1886 and much good work
was accomplished ; later a National Aububon Society was organ-
ized and managed by * Forest and Stream,' until it outgrew its pro-
moters, or the fashion of wearing the plumage of wild birds seemed
to decline, when the Audubon Society and the A. O. U. Protection
Committee ceased to exist, except in name. It was hoped that
the reform was a permanent one, but a few years later the fashion
revived to a greater extent than ever before. Coincident with
this revival a few local or State Audubon societies were organized,
and have since been doing splendid aggressive work. They are
confined, however, exclusively to localities where the most active
ornithological work has been done, notably, Massachusetts, Con-
necticut, New York, Pennsylvania and Illinois. Necessarily the
work of these societies is local, and it was not until another orni-
thologist, Mr. Abbott H. Thayer, appealed to the bird-loving pub-
102 DuTCHER, Report of Committee oh Bird Proieciiom, fjiJ
lie for financial support with which to establish a warden system
for the protection of the breeding sea birds, that anything of a
national character was attempted.
How very successful has been the result of Mr. Thayer's appeal
to preserve the bird life of the seashore for posterity is shown by
the annual reports of this Committee. While the ornithologists of
the country are investigating the habits, food and distribution of
birds, they note and call attention to their disappearance, both
by natural and artificial causes, and sound the alarm which is
responded to by the Audubon Societies that are at the present
time doing such energetic, systematic and effective work in bird
protection. In this connection it is interesting to note how closely
Audubon societies and work for the protection of birds follow in
the steps of scientific ornithological work.
The accompanying map (PI. Ill) shows that in the States where
the American Ornithologists* Union has the largest membership,
Audubon societies have been established, and that where there are
no working ornithologists, no Audubon societies exist, and none are
likely to be founded. This is notably the case in the Gulf States
and in some parts of the West. This may in some degree be
accounted for by the smallness of the population in these localities ;
happily, however, where the smallest number of people live is the
least need for protection work, the greatest need being in the most
densely populated centers, especially near the great cities and
towns having a large foreign element among their citizens who will
kill anything that flies, be it large or small.
The two great bodies of bird-lovers should go hand in hand,
one for the purpose of obtaining an intelligent insight into bird
life, and the other for the protection of the life of the bird.
During the past few years Audubon Societies have been organ-
ized quite rapidly, so that now thirty-two are in existence, some of
them doing excellent and valuable work, while others are merely
organizations in name, being small, and their influence almost re-
stricted to the town in which they are located ; however, these latter
will serve as the nucleus from which to expand in the future. Many
of the most active Audubon workers have for a long time agitated
the subject of a national body composed of representatives from
each State society who could give attention to all subjects of a
national character.
^J DOTCUUt, R^ort of CommitU* #■ Bird PreltcUon. 103
N
104 DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Prottciicn, XjiwL
During the past year, after two meetings of delegates, one held
in Cambridge, Mass., in November, 1901, and a second in New
York in April, 1902, the idea culminated in the formation of a
federation known as the National Committee of Audubon Societies.
The primary work of this Committee is to look after legislation,
the formation of new Audubon societies, and the distribution of
uniform literature, in conjunction with the work of the A. O. U.
Protection Committee. As the work done by these two bodies is
so closely related, and as the same person acts as the chairman of
each, but one report is deemed advisable. Before, however,
detailing the actual results accomplished during the past twelve
months the Chairman takes this opportunity of suggesting certain
lines of activity for the coming year, as well for members of the
American Ornithologists' Union as for the members of the various
Audubon Societies.
Every ornithologist should be the center of bird knowledge in
his locality, not working for his own pleasure only, but seeking to
gather about him all of the bird lovers in his section to instruct
them in the life history, and especially the economic value, of birds.
He should especially seek to interest the young people and chil-
dren, for he may thus be educating and developing a learner who
will some day develop into an Audubon or a Baird. These local
groups will enlarge, their influence spread, and soon may result in
an Audubon Society, if one does not already exist, or in
strengthening the one now at work. The ornithologist should also
make himself thoroughly acquainted with the game and bird laws
of his State, and if they are satisfactory and comprehensive,
should never in the slightest degree violate them, either in spirit
or in deed, and he will thus be in a position to exact from every
other citizen a like strict conformity with the bird statutes. If the
bird laws are not satisfactory he should at once agitate the subject
of adopting the American Ornithologists' Union model law for his
State, and should by every means in his power seek to create
public opinion in favor of a new bird law.
Besides his knowled{j:e of the distribution and migration of the
birds of his vicinity he should acquire a comprehensive knowledge
of the food habits of the birds, in order that he may intelligently
direct the attention of the agriculturists of his locality to the good
^f -^^J DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, I05
that the birds are doing and how great an asset to the State they
are from an economic standpoint. To get this professional knowl-
edge it is not necessary for him to collect bird stomachs for
investigation, for the necessary investigations have already been
admirably made by the Division of Biological Survey of the
United States Department of Agriculture. The many excellent
reports issued as the result of the work of the corps of experts of
this division, should be studied carefully by every person who con-
siders himself an ornithologist.
Again, an ornithologist should seek to attract attention to the
economic and ethical side of bird life and to mould public opinion
through short, pithy articles in the press. Strictly scientific state-
ments clothed in a popular and attractive dress will always be read
and do good, and will often be republished by many widely
separated papers. If prejudice exists among the people regard-
ing certain birds, such as owls, hawks, etc., and if any birds which
are really non-game birds are considered as game birds, a well
devised and instructive series of articles regarding these species
should be contributed to the press. Prejudice is always the result
of lack of knowledge and the ornithologist should seek to inform
the public by every means in his power of the good offices of birds*
and thus change prejudice to ardent friendship.
The work of the Audubon Societies follows somewhat the same
channels, but instead of being the effort of a single individual, is
that of a number of well equipped individuals who work as a unit,
and direct the efforts of a large number of helpers known as local
secretaries. Every well equipped Audubon Society should have
an Executive Committee with an active, energetic chairman who,
if possible, should be an ornithologist, or if this be not feasible
there should be one on the committee. One of the members
should be a lawyer to whom should be referred all legislative and
legal matters that need attention. The treasurer, if such can be
obtained, should be a person who can successfully, by personal
influence, finance the affairs of the society, and the secretary
should be a person who is capable and willing to devote much
time and labor freely to the work. On the committee should be
some person who is ready with the pen, and capable of establishing
active relations with the public press. Moreover, the executive
\
I 06 DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection* \!\wL
committee should never be a large one, but one harmonious in
feeling, easy to get at and responsive to an urgent call. The
president of the society need not necessarily be an ornithologist,
but should be a man or woman well known in the State and of
widespread influence. The larger the list of vice-presidents the
better ; these should be well known and influential persons from
all portions of the Commonwealth, and should include teachers,
preachers, legislators, agriculturists, etc., but only those who are
heartily and earnestly in sympathy with the work of bird pro-
tection. With this equipment for the work let us consider briefly
what the work of an active, energetic Audubon Society is.
First, — As rapidly as possible the State should be organized
into small districts and in each one should be established a local
board, with a secretary to carry out the plans suggested by the
parent society, and also to secure members for the society and to
create local sentiment in favor of bird protection, and the enforce-
ment of the laws.
Second, — A number of illustrated lectures should be kept
actively in circulation among the local branches. These lectures
should not be too scientific in character, but the narrative of bird
life, explaining the lantern slides, should deal briefly with the food
habits, and especially with the song and home life of the bird.
Everything in the lecture should induce a desire in the hearer to
continue the study of the bird as a fellow citizen, entitled to love
and protection. The lectures may be efficiently supplemented by
bird charts, if scientifically correct in drawing, and by well selected
libraries of bird books, to be loaned for stated periods to the local
clubs or branches.
Third, — In the United States at the present time there are
enrolled in the public and private schools nearly 18,000,000
children. It is with this vast body of plastic minds that the
Audubon Societies must deal and must bend every energy to see
that they are early taught to know and love the birds. The hope
and promise of bird protection in this country lies in the education
of this vast army of young people. If they can be brought into
sympathy with the Audubon movement, as it now exists, there will
not be so much need of legislation, nor will so many wardens be
needed in the future. The Societies in each State should get in
^^ow^^l I^TC*™*» Report of Committee on Bird Protection. 107
touch and establish working relations with the Superintendent of
Public Instruction, to the end that educational bird leaflets may be
distributed among the teachers, who will have them read to or
distributed among the pupils. The seed thus sown among the
children will bear fruit of love for nature that will affect the parent
and the home.
Fourth, — Another activity of the Audubon Societies should be
to exact strict conformity to the bird laws of the State, not by
prosecutions in their own name, but by securing legal evidence of
violations of bird laws that come under their notice and furnishing
it to the legally constituted authorities, usually the game commis-
sioners, for use in prosecutions. All such violations as killing
protected birds by pseudo sportsmen, wantonly for sport or
practice, by boys who rob and destroy nests, or kill birds with
catapult or airgun, by the foreign element who imagine that liberty
means license, by all who engage in the barbarous practice of what
is known as side shoots, and by the pot hunter who kills protected
birds and sends them to market where the dealers may keep them
in cold storage for future use ; by the plume hunters who shoot
the breeding birds that the devotees of fashion may be pampered
at the price of suffering and cruelty.
In every section of the country may be found large and flourish-
ing organizations of women, banded together for mutual improve-
ment. These women's clubs can be made powerful auxiliaries and
helpers of the Audubon movement if the matter is brought to their
notice in a reasonable and intelligent manner. On numerous
important occasions during the past year a consideration of the
Audubon movement has formed one of the subjects of debate
by conventions of women's clubs. If the club women of America
frown upon the use of birds' plumage for millinery ornaments very
much ground will have been gained for the cause.
That it is necessary to watch the markets and millinery establish-
ments at the present time is only too well known. Very recently
nearly 80,000 Snow Buntings were found by a State game warden
in a cold storage house in one of the larger eastern cities, and
were identified by a trained ornithologist. The writer of this
report has recently seen offered for sa e by one of the leading
department stores in New York such valuable birds as Flickers
1 08 Dl'Tcher, Report of Committee on Bird Protection. ■ Ffjjjl^
made up for millinery ornaments. The millinery advertisements
in the papers openly offer birds* plumage, seemingly without fear
of the laws. The following taken from a New York paper, of
Oct. 21, 1902, shows that the work of the Audubon Societies is
not yet finished. "At $20.00 Hat of tan felt, shepherdess shape;
bound with tan velvet, trimmed only with a beautiful bird, the
colors of whose plumage — white, rich red brown, gray and black,
blend artistically with the hat."
Letters have been brought to the attention of your Committee
that have been sent out by feather dealers offering to buy in large
quantities such birds as herons, terns, gulls, etc. Further, the
Committee has on file a strictly reliable account of the killing of
40,000 game birds, mostly sandpipers, on the North Carolina
coast, for millinery purposes, the bodies of the birds having been
thrown away after the plumage was secured. In this connection
it may be well to suggest to sportsmen that if they wish the game
birds of the country preserved they must insist that all game laws
should contain a section as follows : " It shall be unlawful for any
person to catch or kill, buy or sell, have in possession or ship, at
any time, any wild bird known as a game bird, to be used as an
article of dress or for millinery purposes."
Fifth. — The Audubon Societies should get in touch with the
farmers' clubs, the granger, agricultural and horticultural societies
of their own States in order that their members may be taught
how much good the birds do the agricultural and forestry in-
dustries. The agricultural interest of the country is by far the
largest and most important one, and those directly interested in it
far outnumber those interested in other industries. The farmers
should be taught to feel regarding the much misunderstood and
persecuted owl family as the late Lord Kimbcrley did, who once
said, " Almost the greatest crime which any one can commit on
my estate is to kill an owl.**
During the past year legislative work has progressed satisfacto-
rily, two States having adopted the model law, viz., Kentucky and
Ohio ; Congress adopted it for the Territory of Alaska, and it was
adopted in tht* Northwest Territories, under the title of the ' Useful
Bird Ordinance,' approved April 19, 1902. This ordinance applies
to a larger extent of country than is covered by any law in the
Vol. XXI
tvn
J DuTCHER, Rtfort of Committee on Bird Protection. 1 OO
United States, and coupled with the provision of the Alaska law,
gives practically uniform protection to non-game birds throughout
the region north of the United States and west of Hudson Bay,
with the single exception of British Columbia.
During the coming legislative season it is proposed to make an
active effort to obtain the passage of the A. O. U. model law in
the following States: California, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Ore-
gon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and
West Virginia. ^
The accompanying map (PI. IV) shows how large a part of the
United States still requires legislative work. The Committee
urges upon the members of the Union and of the Audubon
Societies resident in the several States mentioned above to make
the passage of the A. O. U. model law * their personal interest.
A citizen of a State has a far greater influence in such matters
than an outsider, no matter how well intentioned and sincere his
efforts may be. Create a sentiment by speaking or writing to
your senator and represeatative and urge the merits of the bill
and the vital necessity for its passage. Get as many as possible
of your friends and neighbors to do the same, get the press and
clergy to take up the subject, and likewise the farmers' clubs. In
this manner the voice of the people will be heard from all parts of
the State and the intelligent legislator will carry out the wishes of
his constituents.
The subject of bird protection long since passed the emotional
stage, and while there may still be connected with the growing
movement some pure sentiment, it cannot be considered any
longer sentimental, but is founded on cold facts.
Careful investigation has proved that birds are of great economic
value, and to the end that this important asset of the State and
Nation may.be preserved, the Audubon movement exists in this
country.
While the Audubon Societies and the American Ornithologists'
Union are struggling to preserve the bird life of our own country,
is there not a broader view to take of bird protection ? Should
> The model law is given in full in the report for 1902 (Auk, XIX, p. 59).
1 lO DuTCHEK, Report of Committt* am Bird Protteliom. [j|[
Vol. XXI
1903
J DuTCHBR, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, III
we not take some steps to prevent the loss of bird life in other
countries ; in other words, should this movement not be an inter-
national one ?
It is eminently fitting that the bird protectors of the United
States should join hands with the bird protectors of the other
world powers to stop the use of the plumage of wild birds, regard-
less of the habits of the bird.
Recently there appeared in the press a notice published by the
Millinery Merchants' Protective Association, as follow :
''Inasmuch as the Audubon Societies of New York and other cities
have sent out circular letters warning the trade against burring and sell-
ing birds and bird plumage, which has caused the impression to prevail
among some buyers that all birds and bird plumage are prohibited, we
find that it is necessary, in order to inform the trade of what they can and
cannot use, to make the following statement :
''Milliners are warned to eliminate from their stock the birds of
America protected by State laws, which include what have been popularly
used for the last two or three seasons for millinery trimming, namely,
gulls, sea pigeons, herons, terns, and grebes.
''The laws, both National and State, do not affect the following im-
ported birds : paradise, parrots, parroquets, merles, impeyans, nicobars,
albenas, Japan and Chinese pheasants, golden pheasants, marabous,
gouras, and argus."
These birds certainly all have their mission to perform in the
countries in which they are found, as the North American birds
have on this continent. While it may not be possible for this
government to legislate to prevent foreign bird skins from being
admitted, yet it is believed to be a duty of the A. O. U. and the
Audubon Societies to call the attention of the bird-loving citizens
of foreign countries to the great numbers of exotic birds that are
killed to furnish millinery ornaments for the American trade. It
b reported that the Government of India, in September of this
year, issued an official order prohibiting the export of wild bird
skins and feathers. This will take from the market a great many
parroquets, impeyans and nicobars. As the United States has
recently come in possession of a vast insular province in the
East, we should also urge the Executive of the United States to
instruct the Civil Government of the Philippines not to permit any
112 DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Proteciiom. \Avi
wild birds to be killed or shipped from those islands for millinery
purposes.
The question of bird protection is important enough for the
American societies to agitate and recommend an International
Congress for the purpose of devising means of preserving the
wild birds of the world. We should at this Congress of bird
students and bird protectors send words of greeting and warning
to like bodies in other portions of the world, and to that end your
Committee suggest that a committee of five members be apFK)inted
by the President of the A. O. U. to prepare and forward memorials
to all bird protective societies in England, Germany, Holland,
Japan and Australia, or to any other foreign country from which
wild bird skins are exported. The committee should be composed
of three Fellows of the Union and two Fellows who are members
of the National Committee of Audubon Societies.
One of the vital necessities in movements of this character is
money ; without it the work is seriously handicapped and retarded.
During the past three years an exi>enditure of less than eighteen
hundred dollars per annum has served, by the strictest economy,
to meet the necessary demands of warden service, printing leaf-
lets for educational work, postage, and actual necessary traveling
expenses. No salary or compensation of any kind has been paid.
The work, however, is expanding so rapidly and the demand for
bird literature is so great from all parts of the country that a much
larger sum of money must be received this year than heretofore
or the Committee cannot answer all of the calls upon it. The
detail necessitates the employment of clerical aid in order to give
prompt attention to the large correspondence and other office
work. Additional wardens will be necessary this year, more of
the 18,000,000 school children should be reached, more farmers
should be educated in the economics of birds than ever before.
These are the plans it is hoped to be able to carry out if the
friends and lovers of the birds will give the financial support.
The sordid aspect of continually holding up to view the money
question is disagreeable but is unfortunately necessary. Too few
people realize their public social responsibilities. If they have
been good to the family they think their whole duty performed,
but there is a broader field --the civic duty of doing good to their
VoLXX
1903
1 DvTCHBR, Report of Co.mmittee on Bird Protection, 1 1 ^
neighbors and the State. The protection of birds, from the
economic standpoint, is as much a civic duty as voting honestly
and intelligently. The A. O. U. and the Audubon Societies are
the forces to do the work, but from the citizen who realizes his
civic obligations must come the means.
The work accomplished during the past twelve months is given
in detail under three heads, viz., (i) Legislation, (2) Warden
System, and (3) Audubon Work.
The results are given by States, in order that the citizens of
each may see all that has been done for the birds of their Common-
wealth.
Arkansas.
Legislation, — The bird law is very satisfactory ; the only im-
provement that can be siiggested is to remove all of the beneficial
hawks and owls from the excepted si>ecies, leaving only such as
have been proved to be harmful by the investigations of the U. S.
Department of Agriculture.
Warden System, — No wardens are employed under the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — There is no Society at present in the State,
although the subject of organizing one has been under considera-
tion for some time and possibly may be accomplished in 1903.
An active and efficient member of the A. O. U. Protection Com-
mittee, Mrs. Louise McGown Stephenson, resides in Arkansas and
she reports the following results: "Although my efforts toward
organizing an Audubon Society in the State have been fruitless so
far, there is no doubt that the subject of bird protection has been
brought to the minds of a great number of people during the past
year, and in such a manner that I can really see its effects. A
case that attracted a great deal of attention, because of its unusual
character, was that against a young man charged with caging a
mockingbird, in violation of the statute. A fine of $3.00 and costs
was imposed and paid and the bird was released. In May, I read
a paper, * The Economic Value of Birds*, before the Arkansas
State Federation of Women's Clubs, and exhibited the Audubon
Bird Charts, and distributed many copies of the A. O. U. Protec-
114 DuTCiiKR, Report of CommHite om Bird FroimcH^m. [ j^
tion Committee's report, as well as numbers of the Govemmeot
bulletins. I have given a set of bird charts to the white and
colored schools, and the kindergarten. Several school boards
throughout the State have promised to place the bird charts in
their schools. In April, I wrote to all the Circuit Judges, asking
them to charge the grand juries in their circuits regarding the
bird law.
" I promise diligence in the coming year and hope to achieve
more tangible results from daily work."
California.
Legislation. — This State has practically no laws whatever for
the protection of non-game birds, except the crane and meadow-
lark. Gulls are protected if within five miles of the town of Santa
Monica. An effort will be made at the next session of the legisla-
ture, 1903, to have the A. O. U. model law adopted; this will
afford an opportunity for the large and flourishing society of
ornithologists, the Cooper Club, to display the same intelligent
activity in bird protection that they give to bird study. The very
large and valuable agricultural interests of the State certainly
demand that the valuable birds of the State shall be protected by
the most comprehensive laws.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed. However,
through the Thayer Fund, the serv'ices of Mr. J. M. Willard of
the Cooper Club were secured to investigate the condition of bird
life in the vicinity of Eagle and Tule Lakes; his report, given in
full, indicates how very necessary it is that a good bird law should
be enacted at once. He says:
*' Three men joined forces to gather grebe plumes for the
market. After a couple of season's work, one of them dropped
out, leaving the others, who were half-brothers, still at work.
These men were Tom Kurr and Oscar Rankin. They owned a
boat, and a team with which to haul it from one lake to another.
As far as I could find, they only shot on Kagle Lake and Tule
Lake ; although it is probable that they shot on other neighboring
waters. The ranchers of the country around these lakes seem to
^*J^3^] DuTCHKR, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, 1 1 3
consider the slaughter of the birds as a legitimate trade, and
encourage it rather than otherwise.
^'On June 29, 1899, I visited Eagle Lake and found the hunters
encamped on the south end : they had a boat, and mornings and
evenings they skirted the edge of the lake and shot every grebe
they could see. I asked if they did not often shoot the parents
from the young ; and the answer was : * Oh, yes, but the young
soon die. We do not shoot the mother if we see the squab.* But
they had killed four or five young that morning. Their season
opened about the first of May, and at the time of my visit they
claimed to have secured about six hundred skins; fifteen to
eighteen grebes was considered a good day's work. In preparing
the skin they strip it off, cutting down the back. An abundance
of plaster of Paris is sprinkled on, and after a little drying the
skin is ready for shipment. Their only market was in San
Francisco ; but I could not get the name of the firm. The last of
July the hunters moved their seaf of operations ; but on the 23rd
of September I met them returning. I know nothing of their
further operations that year.
" Not knowing the condition of the birds on Tule Lake before
the shooting began, I cannot form a very good estimate as to the
injury sustained.
" At the time of my visit to Tule Lake this year the water was
very low, and most of the tules of the shallower portions of the
lake were beaten down. I walked out into the very center of the
lake, the water coming scarcely above my ankles most of the time.
Going into the marsh only an American Bittern was seen, but as I
came out I started a flock of fifteen grebes, which flapped away
with discordant cries. Later I found numbers of waders, chief
among which were Black-necked Stilts.
"The lower end of the lake was much deeper, and there was a
little open water between the bunches of tules; on this water
were ducks, coots and grebes in abundance. Considering the
lake from what I saw at this end, I should say that the grebes are
still abundant, but taking the lake as a whole I do not think there
are many grebes on it. I do not think, however, that the upper,
shallower end of the lake is a good place for grebes, at this season
of the year at least; further, there might have been numbers of
I 1 6 DuTCHER, Report of Coutmitiee on Bird ProttctioM. f hm!
birds all about me hidden in the tules, startled by the noise of
my passage, for I made considerable, floundering waist-deep over
and through the mat of fallen tules.
" I can speak with greater authority on the condition of the birds
of Eagle Lake, for I am familiar with it from a six months' stay
in the region.
^'I do not think that the number of grebes has been affected
seriously, if at all, by the hunters. There were not many birds
near the shore, but out from shore half or three-quarter/ of a mile
were numbers of the birds. Several pairs of ducks were seen in
shore, and gulls, terns, cormorants, pelicans, and even plover, were
abundant. One goose had her brood still with her.
'^ The birds out in the lake were, of course, too far away for me
to distinguish species ; but frequently birds would swim in shore,
in pairs or singly, and these were usually grebes. When I was on
the lake in 1899, 1 rowed out among these birds, and was able to
determine that most of them were grebes.
'' So much for the work of the * professional ' plume hunters. I
do not think that their work has had much permanent effect on
the birds. The persons who do the most lasting harm are the
ranchers in the neighboring mountains and valleys. In July, 1899,
I witnessed a sickening slaughter. Three men visited a heronry
of Great Blue Herons, in which the young birds were about two-
thirds grown. With rifles they shot every heron, young and old,
that they could see, killing forty or fifty in all. Elarlier in the
season they had visited a breeding ground of gulls, pelicans, and
cormorants, and had broken every tgg they could find. The
reasons j;iven for this slaughter is that the birds are killing off the
fish from the lake, and that they are of no use in the world."
Mr. Willard adds, in a subsequent letter, that he is heartily in
sympathy with the movement for the passage of good bird laws
in the Pacific Coast States, where they are badly needed.
Audubon Work. — The Audubon Society is merely a local one
at Redlands and is not doing any active State work.
The Cooper Club should take the matter of a good bird law in
hand at once, and should also foster and encourage the Audubon
movement in California. . ♦
^^9<^^] DUTCHER, Report of CommiUet on Bird Protection, HJ
Connecticut.
Legislation, — The bird law is very satisfactory, as it embraces
in its sections all of the A. O. U. model law.
Warden System, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — The Connecticut Society is doing most
excellent work and is one of the most aggressive and well-
equipped in the country. It reports a membership of 7,165.
It has distributed many leaflets, besides 2,000 copies of the
bird law; these have been posted in all express offices, and in 126
summer hotels, and it is contemplated putting them in saloons.
It has three illustrated traveling lectures and eighteen circulating
libraries. The latter have been in 35 different schools, three
months each.
Bird charts have been sent to 53 schools and libraries. The
illustrated lectures have been sent out 54 times.
The Society puts its energies in lectures, charts, and libraries.
Delaware.
Legislation. — The A. O. U. model law is in force.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — The secretary of the Delaware Audubon
Society reports a membership of 535. "We have distributed no
leaflets, but copies of our bird law have been posted in all the
stations along the line of the Delaware Railroad and in every
post-office in towns where we have a member ; also many have
been placed in the public schools. The President owns an illus-
trated lecture and has been most generous in 4ts use. Our Society
is very scattered, but we have created a public sentiment in favor
of bird protection."
District of Columbia.
Legislation. — The law is satisfactory and is rigidly enforced.
Audubon Work, — This Society reports 292 members. Number
of leaflets and circulars distributed, 245, besides copies of laws
I l8 Ditcher, Report of Commiitee on Bird ProtteUom. [j^^
sent to all who have applied for them, and to many who have not.
This Society feels that its most effective work has been accom-
plished in its educational efforts, through the schools and frequent
meetings and lectures in the winter months, and field meetings
during April and May, for the past three years. Classes for
teachers have been formed and courses of six weeks' study given.
All milliners and dealers have been warned against selling the
plumage of native birds. Occasional inspections of markets,
millinery establishments, and live bird stores have been made.
The Society has not directly made any prosecutions but has
furnished evidence that has led to convictions in a number of
cases.
A reference library of bird books is owned, to which additions
are made from time to time.
Florida.
Legislation. — The law is satisfactory and is being enforced.
Warden Work, — Florida contains so much wild land, especially
in the southern portion, and is the home of so many interesting
and beautiful birds, that the Thayer Fund employs a special
ofBcer who has legal authority to make arrests and who devotes
his entire time to the work of bird protection. As the territory
that he has to cover is very large, and the methods of travel are
slow and uncertain, it would be a great help in the work if the
Society could secure the funds with which to purchase a light-
draft naptha or electric launch. This would enable our warden
to move rapidly from place to place and readily overtake plumers,
who have to depend on sails as a motive power while visiting the
breeding grounds when pursuing their nefarious business. Our
warden, Mr. Bradley, is well known to several members of the
A. O. U.. and also to members of the Florida Audubon Society.
How very necessary this special work in Southern Florida is,
can host be shown by a letter dated April 30, 1902, addressed to
the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Florida AuduboD
Society by one of the memlx^rs, a resident of the southern section
of the State, to whom the question was referred for investigation.
*' I did not at once answer your letter in reference to rookeries
^wf^] ^^TCHKR, Report of CommHtee on Bird Protection, 1 19
and the appointment of game wardens to look after them, because
I was not then certain where the greatest need for protection, in
this section of the country, existed. But I have since found out.
I returned only last night from an extended cruise among the
Keys to Cape Sable and the Southwest coast. At Cape Sable I
found the paradise of plume hunters and the purgatory of birds.
The latter, driven from haunt to haunt all over the State, have at
last reached the uttermost limit of mainland territory, and to it
the hunters have followed them. There dwells in a state of
constant terror the last surviving Hock of Flamingo known to
exist within the boundaries of our State ; they number nearly one
thousand birds and are wonderfully beautiful to look upon. There
are also Roseate Spoonbills, flgrets, Wood Ibises, and many other
species in sadly diminished numbers, but still numerous enough
to delight the heart of an ornithologist or bird lover. But, alas,
the relentless plume hunter has followed them even to this remote
sanctuary^ and the reported destruction of bird life last month is
heart sickening. The utter extermination of those beautiful
remnants can only be averted by the prompt appointment of a
resolute game warden and a rigid enforcement of existing laws.
'^ The game warden, to deal with this situation, must be a resi-
dent, well acquainted with local conditions, a strong, fearless man,
and one fully alive to the value of bird protection ; also, he must
be not only willing but anxious to serve.
" Fortunately for the birds and for us, I found residing at Cape
Sable, a man who combines in himself all these requirements.
He is a young man, brought up from earliest childhood on the
east coast of Florida, a thorough woodsman, a sturdy, fearless
fellow, filled with a righteous indignation against the wretches
who, in of>en defiance of all laws, are using every effort to kill off
the few remaining birds of that section, and he is anxious to be
invested with authority for the protection of those that still remain.
He has a brother equally interested in the subject who would
make a most efficient deputy. I have known these boys for many
years, and can honestly say that I know of no better man for
game warden in the whole State of Florida than the elder. It is
a case in which the promptest possible action is desirable, since
another season will doom the Cape Sable flocks to destruction if
I 20 DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, [u^n
measures for protection are not taken in time. The warden must
have fullest authority from the State and be supported by the
entire strength of our Society ; also a certain remuneration must
be given him, as he will be obliged to cover much territory at a
great expense of time."
Since his appointment in May last Mr. Bradley has been actively
engaged in visiting all parts of his territory, posting notices, and
thoroughly informing the citizens that there^ is now a law protect-
ing birds. A large class o^ the citizens are law abiding, but were
not before acquainted with the fact that a bird law is in force. In
several other channels he has rendered valuable service, especially
in investigating the subject of * egging,' which has heretofore been
carried on in an alarming and very destructive manner. Every
effort will be made during the coming breeding season to stop
this wasteful practice, as it is now absolutely illegal.
Another warden was employed, Capt. C. G. Johnson, keeper of
the Sand Key Lighthouse, about seven miles from Key West. A
large number of sea birds breed on this and adjacent keys, all of
which have been thoroughly posted with warning notices. The
warden reports that no birds have been shot nor have any eggs
been taken by fishermen or others. Some eggs are destroyed
every year by turtles crushing them when they are crawling up on
the key to deposit their own eggs. The warden also writes that
the Key West fishermen are all under obligations to him for
permitting them to come ashore on the key in order to catch
sardines for bait. " They have all been notified by me personally
about the law, and I do not think that they will give any trouble
in the future." I was informed by a previous keeper that several
thousand breeding birds could not successfully raise more than a
few hundred young, so thoroughly were the eggs collected or
trampled on in order to get fresh ones on the succeeding visit.
The sea birds that breed on the various keys at the Dry
Tortugas have had complete protection, as per the following letter
from T. C. Treadwell, Captain, commanding U. S. Naval Station,
April 21, 1902.
''Dear Sir: ^
m
"Replying to your letter of the 12th inst. with regard to the protec-
tion of birds on these keys, I have to state as follows :
^^W ^] E)UTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, 121
^It has been the custom here for a long time to get eggs from Bird
Kej. A short time after my arrival here (in June last) I issued an order
forbidding this and published the poster of the Ornithologists' Union, and
birds have not been harassed since that time.
'^I will have the warning notices you sent posted, and issue necessary
orders for the protection of the birds on these keys, and do ^iCiiatever I
can to help the Ornithologists* Union in their work.
"Bird Key is less than a mile from Fort Jefferson. Upon this key
gulls, terns, etc, breed in enormous numbers, also to some extent on
Loggerhead, about three miles distant.
"There are in this vicinity, besides the above gulls and terns, pelicans,
hawks, doves, boatswain birds, and other sea birds."
Pelican Island, in Indian River, which is the breeding home of
a large colony of Brown Pelicans, was cared for by a paid warden
during the present year. Mr. Paul Kroegel, who was in charge,
reports that the island was posted with warning notices, and that
he kept close watch over it. He also says that owing to reckless
slaughter in former years the birds are not nearly as plentiful as
fonnerly, but as the birds are not being disturbed this year they
have become very tame. On May 25 they had about finished lay-
ing eggs. On July 25 he wrote that "the young were all able to
fly. I believe this to be the most peaceful season the birds have
known. Living as I do directly opposite the island I can see
every boat that goes there. I have only had occasion to go there
four times in addition to my regular trips. It is impossible to tell
how many young were raised but I should judge about five hun-
dred or more."
As it is important that this colony should always be protected,
it has been deemed advisable to get legal possession of it, and to
that end your Committee has had it surveyed and has taken all
the necessary steps to purchase the island from the State of Flor-
ida, the title still being in the name of the Commonwealth as
unsurveyed public lands. It is hoped that before the next breed-
ing season is reached the A. O. U. will have absolute control of
the island as owner in fee simple. In this connection it is fitting
to call attention to the very valuable aid rendered by Mrs. F. E.
B. Latham, of Grant, in securing protection for this colony of pel-
icans, and also for material help in other matters relating to bird
protection in her section of Florida.
122 DuTCHKR, Report of Committee on Bird Protectiom. yjy^
Audubon Work, — The State Society is particularly aggressive
and is doing fine work, especially in educational lines. The
chairman of their Executive Committee reports the distribution of
about 4,000 leaflets. "In addition, 2,200 warning notices have
been sent to every part of the State ; 300 of these were posted in
the offices of the Southern Express Company and one in every
post office in the State.
" Fifteen Massachusetts Audubon Bird Charts, accompanied by
the * First and Second Book of Birds' (Miller), are in circulation
as the nucleus of a library. They are in charge Of local secretaries
who place them in schools in their towns. Notices have been sent
to persons found violating Stale bird laws, and sales of caged wild
birds have been prevented. Letters were written to Florida Con-
gressmen urging the passage of the Alaska Game bill. An article
was written by a member of the Society on the aigrette, entitled
* Does Fashion make Women Heartless ? ' This was originally
published in the Florida * Times-Union ', was copied in many
other papers, and was eventually published in leaflet form for
general distribution.
" As the introduction of bird study in schools seemed to be a
matter to bring before the people, several articles on this subject
have been contributed to the ' Times-Union ', and all have been
published, through the courtesy of the editor, Mr. Wilson.
"Special editorials on bird protection have been written and
published by Mr. Painter, editor of the * Florida Agriculturist.*
" For the first time, in Florida, summer schools were opened
at various large centers, and it was the endeavor of the Society to
have some attention given to bird and nature study, and it is felt
that our success was largely forwarded by Mr. Sheats, State
Superintendent of Instruction. The influence of the summer work
is showing itself in the schools of the State, as the following
extracts from letters bear witness : * E^st Florida Seminary and
Military Institute, J. M. Guilliam, Sup't. In our science work we
show the value of birds and shall try to have every student leave
the institution a lover and protector of birds.* The President of
the State Normal School says : * Our model school has a large
amount of nature study and we urge young teachers to cultivate a
love of birds and explain their economic value to their pupils. It
^^M *] DUTCHKR, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, I 23
is a pleasure to me to encourage this work, which I hope in the
future to carry on in a more systematic manner.*
"The membership of our Society is about 400; lately some 230
circular letters soliciting membership have been sent out and it is
hoped good results will follow. When we realize what interest
has been developed since the Society was organized in 1900,
especially among the educational classes, we feel we are furthering
bird protection."
Illinois.
Legislation, — The bird law is satisfactory, as it embraces nearly
all of the A. O. U. model law.
Warden System, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — This is one of the larger and more aggressive
societies, especially in its activity against the sale of illegal millinery
goods in Chicago. It reports a membership of 14,272, and that it
has distributed several thousand leaflets, of which 1,000 were sent
to milliners and contained the portion of the law bearing on their
work. Slides to illustrate a bird lecture have been prepared, and
it is expected that a traveling lecture outfit will shortly be in use.
It also has two traveling libraries in circulation.
Convictions for violation of the bird law have been obtained
through the Game Commissioner and his wardens. An effort will
be made to have a law passed establishing a Bird Day in con-
junction with Arbor Day. The President of the Society has
examined the stock of a number of Chicago millinery houses to
point out illegal plumage. The proprietors of a number of these
houses have written letters to the executive officers of the Society
expressing full sympathy with Audubon work and also promising
not to sell any North American birds. The National Committee
leaflet, * Ornithology in the Schools,* will be distributed by the
Superintendent to teachers in the State. The Society will also
have printed an ' Outline of Bird Study * ; this outline has been in
part printed by the Illinois Federation of Women's Clubs, in one
of its hand books under programs for study classes, and was there
credited to the Aud\ibon Society. Durmg the past year one leaflet
I 24 DuTCHKR, Report of Committee on Bird Protectiom, ft^
was published, * Birds in Horticulture,' by Wm. Pracger. The
Executive Committee is now divided into sub-committees, — on
Meetings, Legal Millinery, Bird Study, and Junior Members, —
for each of which there is a special chairman, and publications.
Indiana.
Legislatioti, — The bird law is excellent, being after the A. O. U.
model ; but the beneficial hawks and owls should be removed from
the excepted class.
Warden System, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — This Society is actively at work along the
line of enforcement of the law, as shown by the following report:
" E. E. Earle, Chief Deputy Commissioner of Fish and Game
for Indiana, was in consultation with W. W. Woollen, secretary of
the Indiana Audubon Society, for the purpose of securing the
cooperation of that society with the State Fish and Game Com-
mission, more effectually to protect the birds. His pro|>osition,
which will be accepted, is to deputize every member of the
Audubon Society an officer of the Commission, with full police
power, and the duty of arresting and prosecuting all persons found
violating the law for the protection of birds.
^^ It is also proposed to have deputies placed at all the lake and
other summer resorts, with explicit instructions to arrest, after
warning, tourists, strangers and others who may violate such laws.
Placards will be posted in the hotels at all summer resorts, giving
a synopsis of the fish and bird law of Indiana."
Iowa.
Legislation, — The bird law needs improving, as it only protects
a limited number of species. As, however, there will not be a
session of the legislature until 1904, nothing can be done during
the coming year except to endeavor to crejite a sentiment in favor
of the A. O. U. model law.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon IVork. --'Yhcro. are two societies in the State, one
with headquarters at Keokuk and the other at .Schaller. The
^*J'^^J DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, 1 25
latter reports a membership of 200, and that it has distributed
some thousands of the National Committee leaflet No. 2, 'Save
the Birds.' It also has an illustrated traveling lecture which is
doing good educational work. No report was submitted by the
Keokuk society.
Kentucky.
Legislation, — During the past year the American Ornithologists*
Union model law for the protection of non-game birds was adopted
in this State.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed in Kentucky;
3,000 muslin warning notices, giving the text of the bird law,
displayed in the post offices of the State, were furnished by the
Thayer Fund.
Audubon Work, — The Kentucky Society is a very small one,
having only 100 members. About 500 leaflets were distributed,
in addition to the warning notices. One library of bird books is
in circulation. Two convictions under the new law have been
obtained.
Louisiana.
Legislatum.—OM June 26, 1902, a new game law was approved
by the Governor. It gives partial protection to six species of non-
game birds, but leaves unprotected all of the other valuable and
beneficial non-game birds of the State. It permits the trapping
and caging of Mockingbirds and Redbirds "for domesticating
purposes." This practically means that the live bird dealers, who
make their headquarters in New Orleans, can send out their
trappers and secure Mockingbirds and Cardinals enough to supply
the rest of the world. If the citizens of Louisiana awake some
day to the fact that their gardens and fields have been denuded
of these beautiful singers they will know that her legislators saw
fit in 1902 to refuse to pass the A. O. U. model law, which had
been introduced. The Hon. J. A. Mcllhenny made a strong
but uphill fight for the bill, which was finally defeated by the
influence of the cage bird dealers.
126 Dutch ER, Report of Committee om Bird Protecti^m. fjiui
IVarden System. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund, nor is it deemed expedient to make any effort to patrol the
few remaining sea bird colonies on the Louisiana coast until there
is a law to protect them.
Audubon Work, — During the past few weeks a Society has
been organized, which will at once be incorporated. Some very
ardent bird protectors will be its officers and managers, and much
good work is expected from them. Its first and most important
duty will be to educate the people of Louisiana regarding the
value of birds as an asset of the State, in connection with its
agricultural and forestry interests. When the people have awak-
ened to these facts they will take measures to protect the birds.
Maine.
legislation, — The law is entirely satisfactory.
Warden System, —Warden work has been continued this year
with the most satisfactory results. All of the stations have been
visited by some member of the Union, and tlie following extracts
from their letters and the reports of the wardens will give in detail
the practical benefits resulting from the operation of the Thayer
Fund.
(;. E. Cushman, warden at Bluff and Stratton Islands, reports
as follows: '^ As I am a fish and game warden for the State, I
have a chance to go along the coast, and I have seen more terns
this year than last, and it has been remarked to me several times
this year that there are more gulls on our coast than for years^
and that they arc very tame. I protect all kinds of birds."
Mr. A. H. Norton, a member of the Union, visited these colonies
July I, and writes: *'It gives me much pleasure to report a most
satisfactory condition there. The colony breeding on Stratton
Island resorts to the brackish rivers which flow from the Scar-
borough marshes, to feed, and while at Pine Point, one of the
seaward harriers l)ctween the ocean and these marshes, I was
greatly pleased to see lar^e flov ks of the terns resting on the sea-
ward beach at high water, a thin;; I have never witnessed there
before, and there were also large tiocks on the edge of the marshes
at rest.
Vol XX
190S
1 DvTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection. 12*J
''I think that the birds have been practically unmolested at
both feeding resorts and breeding grounds. By the way, I had
furnished one of the fishermen at Pine Point, which is a favorite
gunning resort in the season, a good supply of the warning notices,
and some of these he tacked upon the door of his house, and I
think that the result was good. At any rate, the residents there
are quite familiar with the law and respect it, as far as I have
been able to observe."
Mr. Norton, while inspecting the islands in Muscongus Bay,
discovered that terns had commenced to breed again on the Outer
Green Island and Junk of Pork. These islands formerly supported
colonies of terns but later were abandoned. It is evident that
protection and the enforcement of the bird law of Maine may
result in the growth of the infant colonies on these two islands ;
he suggests that these islands be posted in 1903, in the hope that
the colonies may increase to their former abundance.
Mr. Norton also visited Metinic Green Island, where he was
confident he would find a colony of terns. He reports as follows :
" I was not prepared for the sight which was before me. From
the time I departed from Burnt Island Life Saving Station, one or
more terns were always in sight. Upon arriving I found the
birds in practically an unmolested condition, and extremely tame.
I need not say that this magnificent colony of birds owes its
existence to-day to your vigorous and successful action against the
market for tern skins. I estimate the colony at upwards of two
thousand. Two pairs of Laughing Gulls rose at our arrival, and
search revested two nests. That night thirty-two Laughing Gulls,
all adults, came to roost on the ledges just off the shore. Sea
pigeons were in some numbers, grouped in little bunches upon
the water or resting upon the rocks. Petrels were also breeding,
but in small numbers in comparison with other colonies in this
region. The Terns were the Common and Arctic, the latter being
far the most abundant. At this time few nests contained eggs ;
some young were just hatched, and from these every stage of
growth was before me. As I walked along the shore, the young,
which could fly short distances, went in all directions before me,
and the usual throng of screaming adults hovered above.
"In every direction the adults were going out and coming in
I 28 Dutch ER, Report of Committee on Bird Proiectiom, Lhi
with food. A few young were with their parents three miles from
land. Here, as at Freeman's Rock, a great mortality among the
young was observed. There was at this island, at half tide, some
large pools, and a calm cove protected from the ceaseless surf,
and these, at the right stages of the tide, were filled with young
terns bathing like land birds, and evidently they were in the height
of enjoyment when thus engaged. In 1896 I visited this island
and recorded a fairly large group for the size of the place ; to-day
I judge the colony has doubled, and in view of the ease by which
this place could be given protection an overflow seems the natural
result. The island contains about 1 2 or 15 acres, and owing to
the absence of sheep is covered with a rank growth of grass. Mr.
Snow, thci^owner of the island, signified his willingness to lease
the island to the A. O. U., and would probably act as our warden.''
Capt. J. E. Hall, keeper of the Matinicus Rock Lighthouse,
reports that the terns were not disturbed at all, and that there
was a large increase; he also states that there was an unusual
mortality among the young birds owing, he thinks, to the very
cold season and heavy rainfall which chilled the very young birds.
Mr. F. H. Herrick, a member of the Union, visited this island
for the Committee and estimates that this colony numbers about
3,500 birds.
Capt. Mark Young, owner of and warden on No-ManVLand
Island, reports as follows : " Not an egg has "been taken nor a
Herring Gull killed in the colony I have charge of. The first
eggs were found May 15, arid the first young bird June 8." Mr.
Herrick visited this island also, and states that Capt. Young takes
great interest in his birds and makes a good warden. He says :
"I spent some days on the island, July 11-14, and estimate the
number of birds at 3,000. Very few eggs were then to be seen,
but young in all stages, up to one and a half pounds ; no chicks
had taken to the water at that period. I expected to find the
birds far wilder than at Great Duck Island, but could see little
difference in this respect. At either place they settled readily
within 20 or 30 feel."
Mr. A. H. Norton, who made an extended tour of investigation
along the Maine coast for the Protection Committee, reports that
a fair sized colony of terns still flourishes on the Eastern and
Western Barge Islands, near Mt. Desert Island.
^wf^] DuTCHBR, Report of Committee om Bird Protection, 1 29
Capt W. F. Stanley, keeper of the Great Duck Island Light-
house and the warden, reports as follows regarding the large
colony of Herring Gulls in his charge: "Commenced to arrive
March 12, and the number increased until the last of May. The
first egg was found May 15, and the first completed set of three
eggs May 22." He estimates that there are 3,400 birds on Great
Duck Island and about 2200 on Little Duck. He has had no
trouble in protecting the birds or eggs and the only mortality was
from natural causes, almost always accidents.
Mr. Herrick, who spent some days on the Duck Islands, reports
these colonies in excellent condition.
Mr. W. L. Baily, one of the members of the Union, also visited
the Duck Islands this season to complete his study of the life his-
tory of the Herring Gull. He reports that the "gulls were pos-
sibly more abundant than in 1901. There seemed to be more
birds but few more nests ; the great quantity of birds that were
hatched last year were not there and must be wanderers unless
they have settled in other parts.*'
Capt O. Cummings, keeper of the Nash Island Lighthouse and
the wardea of Cone Island, reports as follows : " No eggs were
taken nor were the Herring Gulls disturbed." This colony num-
bers nearly 1,000 adult birds, and there was a normal increase
during the breeding season. This was the only colony that was
not inspected.
Capt. O. B. Hall of the Crumple Island Life Saving Station
was the warden for the colonies of Terns, Herring Gulls and other
birds on the islands in his vicinity. He reports that all of the
Herring Gulls that bred in 1901 in this locality arrived as usual in
the spring, but shortly after left and bred further east on Pulpit
Rock. This he attributed to the fact that the herring were more
abundant there. He posted warning notices, and the birds were
not disturbed. Their increase was normal.
* The terns started to breed on Egg Rock as usual, but during a
very heavy storm on June 27, the rock was swept by the heavy
surf and all the eggs and young were destroyed. The adult birds
then deserted the rock.
Mr. Norton visited this station and confirms the report of Capt.
Hall ; he also adds : " On Freeman's Rock, a mound or ledge
130 DuTCUER, Report of Commiiiee on Bird Fr^UcH^m. \jti.
rising like a rugged cone for perhaps fifty feet and containing less
than two acres of area, was a flourishing colony of terns and
Black Guillemots. From the top of the rock the entire colony of
terns was in sight at once. I roughly estimated them at from
five to seven hundred old birds, with Arctic Terns decidedly in
the majority. I found the warning notices most conspicuously
placed, and on the small rocks they commanded attention long
before we reached them. Further observation led me to consider
this a most important factor in the protection afforded by the Com-
mittee. The birds here were very tame, and there were no evi-
dences of molestation. A few nests still contained eggs (July 25),
and young were in every stage of growth to those that could take
short flights ; none were on the wing, and were everywhere to
be found, making it necessary for one to look carefully before each
step when walking in the scanty herbage. Abundant as were the
living, I noticed quite an extensive mortality among the downy
young, and their decaying bodies were scattered over the island.
There was no visible cause, but two things suggested themselves :
one, an epidemic ; the other, that the damp, cold summer just
passed had not supplied sufficient warmth and sunlight to keep
them from being chilled. The Sea Pigeons were also tame; they
were in little groups of from two to six, and in one instance a flock
of fifteen was seen."
Capt. R. G. Johnson, keeper of Libby Island Lighthouse and
the warden for the Brothers Islands and Libby Island, reports as
follows : " Since the enforcement of the law there has been an
increase in the number of young Herring Gulls raised on the
Brothers. They sit on the shores in large numbers after they
become full fledged. There is also a marked increase in the
number of terns on Libby Island. I do not allow any shooting
on the island."
Capt. L. E. \Vri<];ht was the warden for the Old Man Island and
Double Shot Island, each of which was the breeding place of
Herring Gulls. He reports that the birds were not molested, as
all classes of people take it for granted that the birds must be let
alone.
Mr. Norton, who passed close to the Old Man colony July 26,
reports that numbers of gulls were hovering about it and were
VoLXX
1903
J DuTCiiKR, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, I 2 I
lighting on the ground and trees. The same day Mr. Norton
visited Machias Seal Island and reports as follows : '' Of Puffins,
I saw but few, but was assured by the officials of their abundance
at evening and morning. Petrels were abundant, and terns were
by the thousands. With my limited time I was unaKIe to de-
termine the presence of anything but the Common Tern and
Arctic Tern. Capt. Kelly told me that no one molests the birds."
Audubon Work, — There is no Society in Maine, but the Orni-
thological Society is practically doing the same work in a very
intelligent and satisfactory manner, all of its large membership
being ardent bird protectors. The Secretary, Mr. A. H. Norton,
writes as follows regarding Audubon work : " Expect to have some
data of value to present at our annual meeting, and it seems that
success must come of the efforts that are being made. If the
spirit of bird protection could be worked more into the rural public
schools, I believe that it would be seed sown in the right ground,
With the millinery market banished, a few years of protection, the
early inculcation in the young of the principle of kindness to
living creatures, I believe that our bird colonies will be secure."
Maryland.
Legislation, — None. The present law is a very good one,
although there are some valuable birds that it does not protect,
and others that are not protected the entire year. Killing the
Mourning Dove should not be permitted at any time, nor should
the sale of Flickers be permitted in Baltimore, as it furnishes a
market for birds which must be illegally killed in other portions
of Maryland or in other States.
Warden System, — The same warden was employed who has
acted for the two previous years ; he reports a very steady and
material increase in the colony of Common Terns under his care,
and that no attempt was made by plume hunters to disturb the
birds ; he also says that little or no egging was done, as the fisher-
men think it cheaper to buy eggs of domestic fowls for use rather
than risk the heavy fine for taking the eggs of terns.
Audubon Work, — The Maryland Society is small, numbering
132 DuTCHER, Report of CommiUee on Bird Pr^ieciiam. \awL
only 80 members, and has done no active work during the past
year. The National Committee will make an effort during the
coming season to enlarge and build upon the existing nucleus.
The city of Baltimore, being a large distributing center, needs an
active and aggressive body of Audubon workers to see that the
wholesale millinery establishments do not deal in illegal plumage.
An effort should also be made to improve the present bird law,
as suggested under the head of legislation. The Maryland
members of the A. O. U. are urged to take a personal interest in
this matter and push bird protection work in their State.
Massachusetts.
Legislation, — The bird law in this State may and should be
improved. It does not protect the beneficial hawks and owls, nor
does it protect the Herring Gull and Black-backed Gull between
November i and May i, practically the only season when they
are resident in Massachusetts. In this connection it is but just
to call attention to the fact that the Audubon Society, through its
Protective Committee, has made earnest and repeated efforts to
improve the law and promises renewed efforts during the coming
legislative session.
Warden Work, — Mr. Mackay, who has for so many years
energetically and successfully protected the tern colonies on
Muskeget Island, reports that during the past season they were
cared for in the usual manner, and he also reports that the tern
colony on Penikese Island was protected by the owners, the Messrs.
Homer. By permission of the owner of Naushon Island, Mr. J.
M. Forbes, his manager, Charles O. Olsen, was apf>ointed warden
for the Wepeckets Islands. The islands were liberally posted
with warning notices and the warden reports that this colony of
terns has not been disturbed to any extent this year. On June 15
he counted 860 eggs and found four young birds just hatched.
Mr. J. E. Howland of Vineyard Haven, an ardent sportsman and
an earnest bird protector, volunteered to post warning notices in
the growing colony of Least Terns on Marthas Vineyard. He
reports : " I have a number of times visited the shore and have
seen a good many Least Terns about; they nest in limited
^*?<w^j PuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection. 1 33
numbers all along our south shore. I informed a member of the
State Police, who lives in Exlgarton, of the posting of the notices,
and he gave parties in that section to understand that the warning
must be respected."
Audubon Work, — The Massachusetts Society is another of the
aggressive and progressive ones. It reports a membership of
5,362. It has distributed in the neighborhood of 8,000 circulars
during the past year, besides posting 800 copies of the bird law.
Two illustrated lectures and five libraries are kept at work con-
tinuously.
Definite evidence of violations of the law have been brought to
the attention of the Fish and Game Commission, thus enabling
the State officers to obtain convictions. A second bird-chart has
been published, and the annual bird calendar has been continued.
Each winter a lecture course is maintained. The Society has no
local secretaries, some of whom are doing splendid work in the
way of free lectures, hat shows, and bird walks. The report of
the Society for 1897-1902, published Oct. 10, 1902, gives an
admirable resumd of the good accomplished by this * very much
alive * group of bird protectors. The liberal circulation of this
excellent publication will do very much to advance Audubon work,
not only in Massachusetts but throughout the whole country.
Michigan.
Legislation. — The bird law is, in many respects, an excellent
one, but is not comprehensive enough, as it does not protect all
of the non-game birds. By a very simple amendment to Section
14, Public Acts of 1 90 1, the law would be much improved.
Warden Work. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund. Late in the season a large colony of Herring Gulls was
called to the attention of the Chairman, and it is proposed to have
them guarded by a paid warden during the breeding season of
1903.
Audubon Work. — There is no society in the State, but some
educational work has been done by the Chairman of the National
Committee. Through the courtesy of the Great Record Keeper,
Emma E. Bower, M. D., of the society of the ' Ladies of The
134 HuTCHER, Report oj Committee om Bird Froteciiom. [jjjj
Maccabees for Michigan,' 2700 copies of the National Committee
Leaflet No. 3, * Save the Birds,* has been sent to the local branches
and will be read to the members, who number over 68,000.
Minnesota.
Legislation. — The bird law is a good one but should be
amended by giving protection to the beneficial hawks and by re-
movin<j: the ' Turtle Dove ' from the list of game birds. There
should also be a provision preventing caged birds from being
offered for sale and from being shipped out of the State. If the
words ** wild birds" were to he substituted for "harmless birds"
in the law it would be much more effective.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed by the 'ITiayer
Fund. In this connection it is suggested that if any A. O. U.
member will * locate ' within the State any large colonies of breed-
ing water birds, especially Gulls and Black Terns, wardens will be
appointed for service during the breeding season.
It appears from examinations of millinery stock in other States
that the Black Tern is the species that is now most used as a
millinery ornament.
Audubon Work. — Two societies are working in the State, the
one at Lake City being rather local in its efforts. It was started
by a few persons who loved birds and desired to study them, the
principal object being to interest the children and teach them to
love and protect the birds. The State Society reports a member-
ship of 1200.
Missouri.
Legislation. — The Executive Committee of the Missouri Audu-
bon Society has drafted a new game bill which will be introduced
at the next session of the Legislature, early in 1903. It is very
comprehensive; the A. (). U. model law is used for the sections
referring to the non-game birds. If this bill becomes a law, game
animals and all birds will be hedged about with the ver)' best
kind of legal protection.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed in the State.
Audubon Work. — While the Missouri society is small, consist-
^ w^] I^^^'rcH'«» nefort of CommitUe on Bird Protection. 1 35
ing of about 180 members, it is remarkably active and aggressive.
It has advocated through the press a better bird law and has dis-
tributed 28,000 circulars having the same object in view. Re-
markable success has rewarded its efforts, and it has succeeded
in creating a demand throughout the State for the reforms that
the society recommends. It promises that when its bill becomes
a law it shall be enforced to the letter.
Nebraska.
Legislation. — There is grave doubt whether under the present
bird law any protection is given to the large class of harmless but
useful water birds. Further, no one should be permitted to kill
the beneficial hawks and owls, even on his own premises. Doves
should be removed from the list of game birds. It would be a
marked improvement if the A. O. IT. model law were to be adopted
by the Legislature.
Warden System, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work. — There is no society in the State, but the
members of the Nebraska Ornithologists' Union have been very
active in bird protection work, especially along educational lines.
Leaflet No. 2 of the National Committee, ' Ornithology in the
Schools,' was written by a member of the Nebraska Society, and
it has had a circulation of many thousand copies. It has circu-
lated thousands of leaflets on bird protection issued by the De-
partment of Ornithology of the University of Nebraska. Prof.
Bruner and Dr. Wolcott of the society, give illustrated lectures on
birds, both emphasizing bird protection.
m
New Hampshire.
Legislation. — The bird law is very satisfactory, the A. O. U.
model having been adopted, together with a strong common
carrier clause.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
1^6 DuTCHER, Report of Committtt on Bird Protection. ("jjli
Audubon Work, • — The society reports a membership of 306.
About 4000 leaflets and circulars have been distributed during
the past year ; also 500 copies of the bird law have been posted
or distributed. An illustrated lecture has been loaned to all who
apply for it, free of cost, the only condition being that the lecture
shall be free to the public. During the past year it has been
almost constantly in use and has apparently given great satis-
faction. One circulating library is in use. The Society has had
the cooperation of the very active State Fish and Game Commis-
sion, and has in several cases been instrumental in checking vio-
lations of the law. Fines have been im[x>sed by the Commission.
As there is no appeal from their action, no cases have come into
court. The same activities which have engaged the society from
the beginning will be continued. These are especially interesting
women's clubs in the work, the formation of branch societies, and
the distribution of bird literature at grange meetings and teachers'
institutes, and furnishing to the public schools an outline of bird
study for regular use throughout the year.
The Secretary adds : " So far as concerns the local and State
work of our society, my feeling is one of hopefulness, but when I
see, as I did in my recent trip, both in New York and Boston, how
regardless both milliners and wearers of millinery are of the exist-
ing bird laws and of the feelings of bird lovers, I must acknowl-
edge that the work of the Audubon societies is but begun. It is
evident that our efforts to influence public opinion in behalf of
bird protection must be continued with unabated zeal."
New Jersey.
Lrgislation. — The law is satisfactory and is being actively
enforced by the Fish and Game Commissioners, who show no
mercy to anyone found guilty of killing a non-game bird at any
time, or game birds out of season.
IVanien System. — Two wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund to guard colonies of Laughing Gulls and Terns on the
coast. During the coming season these wardens will have the
power of arrest conferred upon them by the Fish and Game Com-
mission, which will add very much to their etlectiveness. Cftpt.
VoLXX
igoj
] DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection. 1^7
R. S. Ludlam, of Stone Harbor, reports that the 'mudhen,* /. ^.,
Clapper Rails, did splendidly, but that the colony of about i ,000
Laughing Gulls did not raise over 100 young this year, owing to
the loss of nearly all the eggs by a heavy storm tide early in June.
The colony of terns is very small but made a normal increase.
The birds were not disturbed by men or boys during the season.
Capt. J. B. Rider, of Little Egg Harbor, reports that the colony
of terns in his charge did well this year and probably raised about
600 young, as near as he could judge ; they were not disturbed.
These two small colonies of terns and the one colony of Laughing
Gulls are all that are left of the once countless numbers that bred
on the New Jersey coast ; all were cruelly and wantonly sacrificed
on the altar of fashion. It will take years of the most patient and
watchful care to repopulate the beaches and marshes of the New
Jersey coast with these beautiful and graceful sea birds.
Audubon Work. — The New Jersey Society reports about 500
members. Local societies have been started in seven places dur-
ing the past year. About 300 leaflets have been distributed, also
some warning notices. Appeals and letters were sent out to over
200 persons last spring in an effort to pass an anti-pigeon shooting
bill, which proved unsuccessful. During the coming winter the
attempt will be renewed. A circular will shortly be sent out in an
effort to check the use of wild bird plumage for millinery orna-
ments.- The Society is doing all it can to create sentiment in favor
of bird protection and to aid the Fish and Game Commission in
its effective enforcement of the bird laws.
New York.
Legislation, — An amendment, which materially strengthened the
previously excellent bird law, was passed at the last session of the
legislature, as follows: "Section 141. Wherever in this act the
possession of fish or game, or the flesh of any animal, bird or fish,
is prohibited, reference is had equally to such fish, game or flesh
coming from without the State as to that taken within the State."
A great many convictions have been obtained during the past
yeaf by the Forest, Fish and Game Commission, who deserve
great credit for the effective manner in which they are enforcing
128 DuTCHER, Report of Committer on Bird Proieciiom, [ JjI?
the bird statutes. The suit referred to in the report of 1901, was
settled early this year by the payment on the part of the defend-
ant of the sum of $260; there is also a judgment for a large
amount held against him, which it was agreed not to press unless
he was again found violating the law. The moiety of the fine paid
that was given to the member of the Audubon Society who fur-
nished the evidence was contributed to the Endowment Fund for
the Protection of North American Birds.
Warden Work, — Three wardens were emplc)yed by the Thayer
Fund, as in the previous year.
Capt. C. W. Rackett, who had charge at ihe norih end of Gar-
diner's Island, reports that no terns were shot nor were any eggs
taken, and he thinks that the increase has been large.
Capt. H. S. Miller, who has charge of the colony at the south
end of Gardiner's Island, also re[X)rts a very satisfactory season
for the terns, and a material increase. This large colony of terns
is very fortunately located, as Mr. John Lyon Gardiner, the propri-
etor of the island, will not allow any shooting or trespassing, and
therefore the terns and other birds are exceptionally well pro-
tected. There is also a fair-sized colony of terns on Fisher's
Island, which was protected by Capt. Fowler. This colony is
somewhat scattered, and it is more difficult to give them absolute
protection, they being nearer the cruising ground of the hundreds
of small craft that are to be found in Long Island Sound during
the summer months.
At the request of Mr. Harold Herrick of New York, President
Baldwin of the Long Island Railroad had warning notices, giving
the bird laws, posted in every station. This action probably did a
great amount of good. The members of the Bird Section of the
Rochester Academy of Science have done splendid protection
work during the past year by posting a large number of warning
notices in Munroe County, and by work in the schools among the
teachers and scholars.
Audubon Work. — The Secretary of the New York Audubon
Society reports that it is now better equipped to develop the educa-
tional features of the work than ever before. Through the efforts
of Miss Blunt, one of the local secretaries, a sufficient sum of
money was secured to equip an illustrated traveling bird lecture.
^W^J ^U'''C"^*» ^^port of Committee on Bird Protect torn, I^Q
The lecture has been given many times before audiences varying
in numbers up to three or four hundred. Three sets of colored
plates of birds are owned and loaned for class work. Fifty sets of
the Massachusetts Audubon Bird Charts have been distributed
among the local secretaries. Over 18,500 leaflets and law posters
have been distributed during the past year. Of these nearly
1,500 were sent directly to the milliners, live bird dealers and
wholesale butchers in Greater New York. The special circular
sent directed their attention to the State and Federal laws pro-
tecting birds, and requested a strict observance of the same.
Eleven new local secretaries have been added during the past year,
making the number at the present time 68. The total member-
ship of the society is 3,418. The Hon. Charles R. Skinner, Sup-
erintendent of Public Instruction, has agreed to send a copy of
the National Committee leaflet No. 2, * Ornithology in the Schools,'
to every school in the State early in the coming year.
North Carolina.
Legislation, — The bird laws of this State are very unsatisfac-
tory. A, few birds receive protection a portion of the year only,
the balance none at all. County laws now in force should be
superseded by one law for the whole State, which should be com-
prehensive and stringent. In few States on the Atlantic Coast
has there been such a wholesale slaughter of bird life as in North
Carolina. When thousands of game birds are killed in a single
season for the feathers alone it is time to cry, halt ! and for the
strong arm of the law to interfere. Until the legislature of North
Carolina sees fit to pass an effective bird law this slaughter will
continue, but it is to be hoped that one will be enacted before it is
too late.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund, as it has been found useless to engage wardens where there
is no law to be enforced. When a good bird law is placed on the
statute books of North Carolina, wardens will be at once
employed to guard all of the colonies of sea birds that remain on
the coast.
Audubon Work, — The Audubon Society of North Carolina
140 DuTCHER, Report of Committer on Bird Protection. \j,t!i.
"for the Study and Protection of Birds and the Preservation of
Game/' was organized in Greensboro, North Carolina, on the nth
of March, and was incorporated on the 21st day of October, 1902.
At the present time its membership is as follows: Life mem-
bers, 8 ; sustaining members, 86 ; regular members, 308 ; junior
members, 386 ; total, 788. Six branch organizations have been
formed in graded schools, and it is the pur[X)se of the Society to
grant charters to these branch societies. They are as yet in an
experimental stage ; some have regular meetings and much inter-
est is displayed, while others have been all but failures. About
9000 leaflets have been distributed, and the secretary has given
fifteen public lectures, presenting the objects and aims of the
Audubon Society. It is assisting the National Committee in pro-
curing better legislation for the preservation of birds, and as a
means of doing this is preparing to distribute 100,000 leaflets in
the State before the meeting of the legislature in January, 1903.
Ohio.
Legislation, — During the past year a radical improvement was
made in the game laws of Ohio, the section covering the non-g^ame
birds practically being the A. O. U. model law. If the Ohio
Audubon Society sees that the statute is enforced the birds will
receive ample protection.
By a special act of the legislature an annual Forest and Bird
Day was authorized to be observed in the State.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed, but the Thayer
Fund furnished for distribution in the State 3,000 warning notices,
giving extracts from the non-game bird sections of the law, and
the penalty for violating the same.
Audubon Work. — The Secretary reports as follows : " The
Audubon Society of Ohio has just completed the fourth year of
its existence. From a stniggling nestling, it has grown steadily
and healthily toward maturity, as nestlings should, and already its
win^s are plumrd for glorious flight. As the eagle, 'she dwelleth
on the rock and hath her lodging there.' That rock is success.
"The Audubon Society exists no longer as a sneer and a by-
word, in the eyes of the jjeople, a sentimental fad, but as an
Vol. XX
] DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, 1 4 1
earnest body of Nature-lovers and students, too far removed from
vulgarity to contemplate with pleasure the wanton destruction of
any living creature. ^
" From the auspicious inauguration of the Society until the
present time there has been a growing knowledge with the public
of the aims and purposes of the great Audubon movement, so that
inquiries concerning the whys and wherefores of the work are
rapidly diminishing in number. The demand now is not so much
* Tell me something about this new Society,* as * Give me litera-
ture, that I may by this means tell others the s'tory.'
" The mails have been used hundreds of times for the purposes
of the Ohio work this past year, and the four newspapers that
are printed in English in Cincinnati, have received and kindly
published notices of all monthly meetings.
"There has been a constant and impelling desire that the
teachers and club women of our State should receive our literature.
" In November of last year, the Corresponding Secretary carried
a message to hundreds of women assembled at the State Feder-
ation of Women's Clubs in the city of Dayton, she having been
granted, by the courtesy of the President of that organization, ten
minutes' time upon the program of the convention, and in con-
junction with the Recording Secretary, who, by the way, did
splendid service at the same time in the public schools of Dayton
in behalf of Bird Protection, distributed much literature from that
point.
"The President and acting Treasurer met the Game Commission
at the Cuvier Club, during the session of the Ohio Legislature, and
proved themselves extremely useful in making valuable suggestions
to the Commission relative to the proposed amendment of Section
6960 of the laws of Ohio, the section relating to the non-game
birds.
" Our President originated and secured the passage of the bill
making it obligatory upon teachers to observe Forest and Bird
Day in the schools of the State.
" Our Society is always represented in as many County Institutes
for Teachers as possible. If there cannot be personal represen-
tation, a message is sent.
"A Branch Chapter is just forming this week in Cleveland,
142 Dutch ER, Report of Commiitm on Btrd ProUction, [^^
which its projectors state, is to be the banner organization of the
State.
" The workers in Cincinnati are being apppointed to the dif-
ferent school districts of the city, for the purpose of conducting a
vigorous campaign in the schools during the winter months.
" Of all classes, the mothers are the hardest to reach, and our
greatest hope lies in the teachers, who are molding, in large
measure, the generations to come."
Oregon.
Legislation. — The bird law is very defective, as it does not
protect all of the non-game birds of the State.
Wardtti Work, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work. — The Secretary re[X)rts as follows: "The
Audubon Society of the State of Oregon came into existence July
I, 1902, as the result of the untiring enthusiasm of the Rev. Wm.
R. Lord, the delegate whom Oregon sends to the present con-
vention. The association has about 300 active members, but this
is hardly a correct index to the interest that has been aroused.
Last spring Mr. Lord gave bird talks to 18,000 public school
children, to about 1,000 teachers, and to 3,000 other adults in
evening lectures, everywhere receiving a hearty response to bis
message. There is every indication of a large increase in the
membership next spring.
" No leaflets or circulars have been sent out, publicity having
been obtained in other ways, viz., by means of Mr. Lord's talks,
the circulation of his book on Oregon and Washington birds,
which has been placed on the list for supplementary reading in
the public schools by the State Text Book Commission of Oregon,
and by the frequent and full newspaper reports of the work of the
association.
"Copies of our bird laws are in the hands of our president, and
are sent out upon request.
"Lectures have in the main taken the form of impromptu talks,
without illustration. We have a collection of unusually attractive
photographs of Oregon sea and land birds, taken in their native
^MW^J I^UTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection. 1 43
haunts by some of our members. Stereopticon slides have been
made of these. The photographs, enlarged to life-size, are of rare
beauty as well as of scientific value.
" There have been one or two prosecutions and convictions of
offenders against the bird laws; one $10 fine for robbing nests in
Portland was imposed by the eftorts of our president, who is an
attorney. •
"Our work has chiefly taken the form of bird boxes and field
observations. The John Burroughs Club of Portland offers annual
cash prizes to the school children of Oregon for their knowledge
of native birds. There is a growing interest in these contests,
which embrace both a field .test, 60 ^, and a composition test,
40 %, An auxiliary club of 71 members at our State capital is
about to introduce its work into the public schools. Mr. Lord
expects to continue bis lecture work next spring. Other projects
will be planned to meet the demands of the hour as they arise."
Pennsylvania.
Legislature, — The non-game bird laws are in a very unsatis-
factory condition, inasmuch as there is doubt whether the law of
May 14, 1889, as amended April 15, 1891 (Sec. 30-36), was
repealed or superseded by the law of 1897. The first of the above
statutes is by far the better of the two and should be re-enacted,
if it is not now in force. The Audubon Society should bring a
test case to have the matter legally determined.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund. In this connection the following very interesting letter is
presented :
" On my father's birthday I take great pleasure in sending the
enclose^ check as a contribution towards the fund for the pro-
tection of the gulls and terns. One of the last things which gave
him pleasure in this world, a few days before his death, was
watching from his window at Wood's Hole, a large flock which
had come into the harbor after a sehool of young herring. He
used to lament their [x>ssible extinction, and would have rejoiced
in this effort to prevent it. Yours very truly, Lucv H. Baird."
Audubon Work, — The Secretary reports a membership of 6,800.
144 DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection. fj^
''About 2,000 educational leaflets were distributed during the
year, also 1,000 copies of the bird laws have been posted. Our
best work has been accomplished with our circulating libraries.
There are twelve of these of ten books each. These were sent to
sixteen different schools, making a total of 29 periods of three
months each. A number of the teachers wrote appreciative letters,
telling how much the books had been used and enjoyed."
Rhode Island.
Legislation, — The bird law is satisfactory.
Warden System, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — The Secretary reports the membership to be
621. About 500 leaflets have been distributed. An illustrated
lecture is owned and is in constant use, also a circulating library.
Fifty sets of the Massachusetts Audubon Society Bird Charts have
been purchased during the past year and have been distributed
among the country schools of the State. It is planned to have
bird lectures under the auspices of the society during the present
winter.
South Carolina.
Legislation, — Some of the provisions of the bird law are excel-
lent, but the law is not comprehensive enough, as it does not give
protection to a large number of species. ITie bird lovers of
South Carolina, and especially the agriculturists, should insist
that the law be improved at the next session of the legislature.
Warden System. — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work. — This Society is local and has not accomplished
anything outside of its immediate neij^hborhood. An effort will
be made by the National Committee during the coming year to
enlarge and strengthen the nucleus already established. The
A. O. U. members and all bird lovers are urged to aid this effort.
^*lw^] DUTCHBR, Report of Committee om Bird Protection, 14c
Texas.
Legislation, — An effort will be made to have the American
Ornithologists' Union model law passed during the next session
of the legislature, which convenes in January, 1903. While some
of the song, insectivorous and sea birds are protected under the
present law, many are not, and a large number of counties are
exempted from the statute. The large agricultural interests of
Texas imperatively demand that a comprehensive bird law shall
be enacted at once and strictly enforced.
It is a pleasant duty to call attention to the very valuable work
being done by the Southern Pacific R. R. Co., through its Indus-
trial Agent, Prof. H. P. Attwater, who visits all portions of the
Commonwealth to lecture to farmers' clubs and granges; this
gives him an opportunity to call attention to the value of all bird
life and thus create a sentiment in favor of its protection. The
Thayer Fund has furnished a large number of leaflets regarding
birds for distribution among the agriculturists and teachers of
Texas.
Warden System. — It has not been deemed best to employ any
wardens on the Texas coast until a satisfactory law is in force.
If the next legislature enacts a good law wardens will be engaged
for the breeding season of 1903.
Audubon Work — There is no Society in Texas at the present
time, but steps are being taken to organize one, and it is hoped
that before the next report is made a large and aggressive society
will be at work.
Vermont.
Legislation, — While the present law is a very good one in its
main features, it can be improved. An efTort in that direction is
now being made, the A. O. U. model law being before the legis-
lature, which is now (November) in session.
Warden System, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — A society has been established about a year,
it having existed as a bird club for some time previous to organi-
1 46 DuTCHER, Report of CommitUo on Bird Froitciiom. f^^
zation as an Audubon Society. The enrolled members number
250 The local work done has been very satisfactory and its
influence is spreading to other portions of the State, two branch
societies having already been formed. They have succeeded in
interesting the children to an unusual degree by junior meetings
and bird walks. Two libraries of bird books are in circulation
among the districts schools, and have stimulated interest in bird
study.
Virginia.
Legislation. — The bird laws of this State are wholly bad ; very
few non-game birds are protected at all, some are protected during
a portion of the year, while that most destructive of all methods
of bird extermination, egging, is legalized by law during the early
weeks of the breeding season.
The county system of local bird laws is in vogue, and it should
be superseded at once by a law covering the whole State. Bird
protection cannot successfully be promoted where the law protects
a species in one county and in an adjoining county no protection
is given. It is a well established legal proposition that wild birds
are an asset of the State and do not belong to the citizen as an
individual, therefore the State should provide a law for their pro-
tection and preservation, just as it does for any other of its val-
uable rights and assets.
The A. O. U. members and the Audubon Society, as well as all
bird lovers, should combine in a strenuous effort to have the A. O.
U. model law adopted. At the last session of the legislature a
bill was introduced by Representative James R. Caton, at the
request of the Virginia Audubon Society, but it was not carried
through the House, although it was favorably re[X>rted and reached
its third reading. The session was short, and was largely taken
up with a constitutional amendment.
The effort for a new bird law will be renewed at the coming
session of the legislature, and in the interim educational work will
be done through the press and by the distribution of leaflets, in
order that a public sentiment for bird protection may be aroused.
If from every portion of the State the constituents of the delegates
'^?^] ^'''''C*'^' Report oj Committee on Bird Protection, I^y
write and urge, or even go so far as to demand a new law, the
appeal will be listened to.
Warden Work, — On the Virginia coast some of the most impor-
tant work attempted by your Committee is done through the
Thayer Fund. The work, however, is very largely moral suasion
rather than legal protection. . The law is so thoroughly unsatisfac-
tory that the wardens find it hard to give absolute protection
during the early weeks of the breeding season. With all the draw-
backs it is our pleasant duty to report that ail of the sea bird col-
onies on the Virginia coast are making a steady gain. If the legal
taking of eggs could be stopped, the gain would be much more
rapid than it is now. It is now impossible for plume hunters to
visit this coast and kill Terns and Laughing Gulls by the thou-
sands, as they did only a few years since ; if such an attempt were
to be made the plumers would have to reckon with a very deter-
mined party of eight wardens, extracts from whose reports are
herewith given.
Capt. J. M. Fedderman, of Assateague Beach, says : " Eggs are
taken, but no one can estimate the number, as parties hunt for them
at all times. From two boys I took i6 Marsh Hen's eggs and 6
Willet's eggs, which were replaced in the nests and were afterward
hatched. On August 26 a party did some shooting, but on inves-
tigation I was unable to find any gulls or terns on them and
therefore could not have them fined. There is a good harbor here
for vessels, and tfie sailors give the most trouble looking for
eggs ; boys being the next most troublesome. Summer boarders
rarely disturb eggs but shoot at anything that flies, merely for
practice. Marsh Hens are much more numerous than four or ^\t.
years back, and there has been some gain in the numbers of Wil-
lets. If means could be devised to stop the taking of eggs the
increase in birds would be surprising."
Capt. J. B. Whealton, of Wallops Beach, says: ** Most of the
people in this vicinity are in favor of protecting birds, but there
is a class of baymen that will take eggs, and sometimes kill breed-
ing birds. They give more trouble than any other persons. Prior
to two years since the gulls were almost all destroyed, but now there
is a big increase ; I should judge they have doubled in numbers,
and there is also a marked increase in the Willet ; more young
Willets were seen in August than at any time in five years past."
148 DuTCHER, Report oj Committee om Bird Protection, ^tal^
Capt. L. F. Taylor, of Metomkia Inlet, says : "There has been
a normal increase in the Laughing Gulls and Willets, but for some
reason the Marsh Hens do not seem to be so numerous. The
increase in Big and Little Strikers (Terns) seems to be larger than
it was last season. Very few eggs have been taken in my local-
ity; on only one occasion did I have to prevent egging by a
party of two. They desisted at once when I cautioned them."
Capt. J. A. D. Savage, of Wachapreague Beach, says : *' The
Marsh Hens have made some increase, but the other species, viz.,
Black-headed Gulls, Flood Gulls, Willets, and Strikers have not
increased materially. This can be accounted for as follows : the
beach here is gradually washing away and getting lower, which
-^ compels the beach breeding birds to move to other localities where
they can find higher beaches and where there is less danger from
storm tides. I believe that fewer eggs have been taken this
season than ever before, and I do not know of a single instance
when birds were killed. Those who made a business of killing
birds in former years have been forced to desist, knowing that
they are watched and will be brought to account if caught."
Capt. J. W. Richardson, of Parramores Island, says: **It is
not unlawful to take eggs during a part of the breeding season and
many are taken each year : but I can see that since I have been
acting as warden there are many more birds now than formerly,
with the exception of the Willet and Marsh Hens, which are only
holding their own. This is owing to the tact that they arc
slaughtered after the open season commences, which opens
nearly a month too early. The law should be changed."
Capt. J. E. Johnson, of Hog Island, says : " Many eggs arc taken
during the open season, but by reason of the protection given the
birds I can see that hundreds are raised each year ; it is espe-
cially noticeable in the Black-headed Gulls, Terns and Willets.
Marsh Hens do not seem to increase, owing, I think, to the high
tides that destroy many of them."
Capt. J. R. Andrews, of Cobbs Island, says: "Large numbers
of the eggs of the Black-headed Gulls were taken during the open
season, also a few of the eg<;s of Terns and Skimmers. The men
who rake for clams give me the most trouble, as they live in boats
which are anchored very near the marshes where the gulls breed.
VoL XXl
190S
J DuTCHBR, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, 149
The egging is mostly done at night when it is impossible to
catch the offender. This year I found a new colony of about
1,000 Skimmers on an island where they had not bred before;
there were also about 500 Common Tenis and 30 pairs of Wil-
son's Plover breeding on the same island. This must be an over-
flow from the colonies near the station."
Capt. G. D. Hitchens, of Smiths Island, says : "There is a great
increase in the birds since they bave been protected on Smiths
Island and on the Isaacs, and the increase is greater this year
than last." The cooperation of the Marine Hospital Service to
prevent egging on Fishermans Island was asked by your Com-
mittee and was accorded by Surgeon General Wyman, who wrote
as follows : " The Quarantine Officer reports that he believes it
advisable to cooperate with your Union in its work, and to this
end has directed his subordinates on Fishermans Island to desist
from further gathering eggs thereon or in that vicinity."
The bird colonies on the Virginia beach were visited by a num-
ber of members of our Society during the past season and all unite
in reporting that very satisfactory work is being done by the ward-
ens. Mr. Kirkwood made his annual inspection trip in August
to all the stations. A few statements are extracted from his very
full report :
"Capt. N. B. Rich, who last year had charge of the Assateague
Beach station, is now a superintendent of the life saving service.
When sending out orders to the various captains he added a
clause directing them to protect the birds all they could without
interfering with their regular life saving duties, and they now feel
that they can talk in quite a different tone from that used formerly.
The wardens all agree that the law should be changed.
" The increase in the numbers of Least Terns is too great to be
the result of colonies on this beach ; some of them must have
come from further north.
"I did not see any Royal Terns, so they probably have been
exterminated, so far as Virginia is concerned. On the whole,
birds were more numerous than last year, the increase being about
normal, except in the case of the Least Tern, which is entirely
beyond expectation."
Audubon Work, — There is a small society which is doing con-
150 DtrrctlBi^ R9p0rt of C&mmith^ 0m Bird Pt^UeHmL [jJll!
siderable work in trying to get better legislation, in whkh effort
all the Virginia members of the A. O. U. should }oin.
Washinoton.
Legislation, — The bird law is very limited in its scope and only
protects song birds. An effort will be made at the next session
of the legislature (January, 1903) to have the A. O. U. model law
passed.
Audubon Work, — There is no Audubon Society in the State,
and little has been done in bird protection work as yet.
An interesting incident regarding the tameness of sea gulls b
related by Sergeant Albert I. Smith of Battery I, First Artillery, U.
S. A. : '' It may interest you to hear of an incident that was part of
my daily pastime while stationed at Fort Canby, which is a lonely
post, sticking up on the jagged coast cliffs. There were innumer-
able sea gulls inhabiting the rocks and during the rigorous winter
months I noticed that the poor birds scarcely caught sufiiciett
food from the stormy waters of the coast. I b^^n by depositing
among the rocks the collected remains from our mess table after
each meal. The feathered indigents readily understood my pur-
pose and gathered in vast numbers to partake of our soldier food.
Soon they grew exceedingly tame and particularly alert for the
buglers mess call, the notes of which no doubt, were as welcome
to them as to us. Round and round they would circle, screaming
for joy, and when I appeared on the rocks with their food box they
would flutter about me like gentle barn-yard poultry, scrambling
over my body or alighting on my wrists to peck a morsel from
my fingers."
The above story is vouched for by Mr. William H. Kobb^, who
says : ^^ The gull story is doubtless true. I have often seen the
Battery cooks thus feed the birds, which became so tame as to
become a nuisance, walking up and down the road and even into
the kitchen. I can hardly believe that the birds could distinguish
mess from any other call, but it is possible that all the calls during
the middle of the day had the same effect upon them.^
V«LXX
■•09
1 DuTCHSR, Report of Committee on Bird Protecii^m, I IJ |
Wisconsin.
Legislation, — The law is entirely satisfactory.
Warden Work, — No wardens were employed by the Thayer
Fund.
Audubon Work, — Audubon work is going on actively and suc-
cessfully, especially among the school children. The membership
is now very nearly 18,000. The Society owns nearly 200 lantern
slides of birds, 70 being colored, which are rented for a small sum
to any school branch or local society desiring to use them. One
circulating library of bird books is owned ; there have been so
many calls for it that the society hopes to add others in the near
future. By the courtesy of the State Superintendent of Public
Instruction the Arbor and Bird Day Manual for 1902 carried the
invitation of the Audubon Society to each public school in the
State to cooperate in the work of bird protection and to form a
school branch. The success of these branches is almost entirely
due to the intelligent assistance of the teachers, without which it
would be impossible to carry on any organized work among the
children of the Commonwealth. The Society publishes a small
monthly magazine, devoted especially to bird subjects for children.
The Thaykr Fund.
The treasurer of the fund submits the following statement,
showing the subscriptions and disbursements during the year end-
ing November i, 1902, to the correctness of which he certifies.
[;:r
William Di^toier, Trtasnrer.
■
■V"--
In Account with Thaykr Find.
Balance brou(fht forward from 1901
$30.. f«
SUBSCRIPTIONS.
J. E. Ihuver
%l$liXXl
Mrs. n. L. Higgin.on
$.0.00
S. B. Yty
S. McV. Hinton
C. L. Freer
100.00
Mr.. M. L. Parsons
10.00
Miss L. L. Kane
:ooxx)
J. J. Donaldson
10.00
Mrs. Qi A. Shaw
50,00
W. G. Van Name
Mrs. V. E. Macv
S0.00
L. H. Baird
10! 00
C. H. Dodge
50.00
Miss Fanny Dwighl
10.00
M s. D. I'ir.kman
50.00
A. C. Gelpcke
to.00
W K. Dodge
B. EI. Christy
George Dorr
50.00
H. Elerrlck
IOlOO
George W. \'anderbilt
50.00
E. Bowditch
Florida Audubon Society
50.00
Mrs. W. A. Wardsworth
10.00
Charles H. Raymond
25.00
Mrs. E. Davi.
10.00
C. P. Latimer
JS.oo
Mrs. T. M. Brewer
10.00
E. D. Sharpe
»SOo
H. S. Baldwin
9.00
Mrs. J. S. Kennedy
isoo
L. J. Emery
S-oo
E, L. Osgood
35.00
Mrs. tl. Holt
5.00
Dean Sage
J500
Rev. L. F. Chamberlain
s-oo
I[. S. RuBsell
25.00
Mrs. S. L. King
5-00
E. L. Parker
25«'
Elizabeth A. Gatter
5-00
F. J. lleckei
JJ.OO
Harriet E. Clarke
5.00
S. G. Ward
IJ.OO
n. 11. White
5.00
J. PiMOholt
25.00
M, L. Van Orden
5.00
W. tlunneweii
is-00
F. M. Day
S-oo
G- Abbott
15.00
S. Brooks
5.00
Ur. 11. C. Eno
25.00
Geo. C. Shattucit
5.00
S. IJ. Wnrren
25.00
Miss Cowper Lord
5.00
Anne Whilnej
Miss Lord
5.00
W. B. Uickerman
20.00
Benj. Nicoll
5.00
Conn. Audnbon Society
JO. 00
Adeline Willi.
John Markoe
10.00
S- L. King
5.00
\Vm. BnwMcr
19,62
Mrs. Theodore Thoma*
Rulbven I>eane
i9.fij
J. L. Cox
5.00
Mr. and Mr>, W. M. Smith i<;.oo
Mrs. W. Putnam
5.00
Royal. M. and Reg. C. Robbing 14.00
Mrs. C. Platl
Mrs. J. W. Elliot
15.00
Mrs. Drinton Coie
5.00
W. S. Rainsford
11. ou
Mrs. S, S. Darrell
5.00
Corniliu. B. Smirh
10.00
A- It. Duncan
Adeline Manning
10.00
H conlribulion. from $1.70 to
Miu A. F. Bnwh
$1.00 each
4>'4.f
Mi.. Clara L. Crane
10.00
^*?io^^] I>UTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection, l^T^
EXPENDITURES.
Arkansas.
2 Bird Charts $2.38
Express 44 2.82
California.
J. M. Willard, trav. expenses — investigation
of colony of grebes, etc., at Tule Lake*. 49.00
Telegrams 4.35 53.35
Colorado.
2 Bird Charts ...... 2.38
Florida,
2 Government coast charts showing bird
kejrs .50
Express 2.15
Mrs. F. E. B. Latham, trav. expenses visit-
ing breeding colonies .... 2.50
Warning notices 40.85
Sec'jr of State — 3 certified copies of law 5.05
Negative of birds on Pelican Island . 2.00
J. O. Fries, survey of Pelican Island 10.00
" " expenses in the matter of pur-
chase of Pelican Island .... 25.00
P. Kroegel, affidavits " " " " 4.00
4 Wardens, salaries 250.00
Telegrams and exchange .... 1.41 343^46
Geor^'a.
Bird books for Agric. Com. of Legislature .
Telegrams to legislators ....
Printing circular letter to Hort. Societies
Indiana.
2 Bird Charts for Audubon Society
Chairman, trav. expenses to Legislature
7.20
3-55
1.50
12.25
2.28
28.00
30.28
154 I>UTCHSR, Report 0/ CommiH9€ 0m Bird FraiociUm. £^
Iowa,
2 Bird Charts for Schaller Audubon Society
Slides for Iowa Audubon Society
Advertising in Des Moines ' Capital ^ .
Kentucky,
Dr. T. S. Palmer, trav. exp. to Legislature
Chairman, " " "
Warning notices
Certified copy of law
Express
Telegrams
a.38
11.80
2.5s
19.00
3035
34-50
1.03
.70
533
«6.73
9a8i
L,auisiana.
Circular letters sent to Legislators
Typewritten copy of House Bill 132, A. O. U
Model Law
Chairman, trav. expenses to Legislature
Certified copy of bird law
Telegrams . _
13-60
5-00
«35-89
3-75
6.36 I<^.6o
Maine.
I X Wardens, salaries
A. H. Norton, trav. expenses inspecting
breeding colonies
H. L. Spinney, "
(i
«
Maryland.
Warden, salary
Massachusetts.
Warning notices
X Warden, salary
Express
J. E. Howland, posting warning notices
at Marthas Vineyard
>94-40
37-30
3-50 325-20
25.00 25.00
6.00
30.00
•95
350 40.4s
Nebraska.
2 Bird Charts
Express on Leaflet No. 2
a.38
1.02
3.40
▼AKX
] DuTcnoi, RtpTt 0f Cmmiit99 #» AM FMi$iMm* 155
Chairman, trar. ezpentet to Legislature
Telegrams
Wardens, salaries ....
4-43
•49
40.00 44«9i
Nrtff York,
Chairman, trav. expenses to Legislature
E. HiclL, warden, trav. ex p. in re illegal
shooting
X Copy Check-List to Forest, Fish & Game
Com
t Certified copy New York Law .
a Bird Charts for Sup't Schools of N.
State
a Wardens, salaries
Warning notices ....
Birds purchased in evidence
Telegrams
Advertising
Express
Y.
1^95
9.83
1.05
1.30
4.76
40.00
24.00
.36
2.00
•30
105.78
North Carolina,
Bird books for A. S. Doane ....
Bird charts for N. C. Audubon Societv
Printing leaflet No. i (N. C.) for Aud. Soc ^
" " No. 2
Express on above .
it
<i
c<
«
«-75
2.36
12.25
12.20
1.30
29.86
Okio,
Chairman, trav. expenses to Legislature
Warning notices
28.00
41.00
69.00
Virgimia.
Chairman, trav. expenses to Legislature
Telegrams to legislators
F. C. Kirkwood, trav. expenses inspecting
breeding colonies ....
Wardens, salaries
40.65
2.08
44-35
230.00 317.08
1^6 DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection* \!\wL
General Expenses of Committee.
Printing
Advertising .
Postage
2 Bird Charts for office
Letter cases .
Clasp envelopes, sending out reports and
pamphlets
Express . . • . , •
Telegrams and messenger . •
Sundries
Balance forwarded to 1903
220.30
20.00
144.00
2.x8
2.00
1538
7-45
1-59
12.25 425.15
$2102.52
«43.77
$2246.29
The above report and financial statement are
Respectfully submitted, for the Committee,
William Dutcher.
New York City^ November i, 1902.
ENDOWMENT FUND FOR THE PROTECTION OF NORTH
AMERICAN BIRDS.
Contributions, 1901 ....... $170.05
Contributions, 1902 ....... 5K*S8
Interest earned ........ c.6n
Total amount of Fund, November i, 1902, $227.58. Deposited in Free-
stone Savings Bank of Portland, Connecticut, bv direction of Council of
American OrnithologiKts' I'nion, incorporated in 1888 at Washington.
District of Cohimbia.
FORM OF BEQl'EST.
1 do hereby give and l>o(jueath to "The American Ornithologists*
Union " of the City of Washington, District of Columbia, for the Endow-
ment Fund for the Protection of North American Birds,
dollarK.
^*i«T DuTCHKR, Report of CommiiUo on Bird Proiectiotu 1 57
LIST OF COMMITTEES.
A. O. U. Protkction Committks for 1903.
William Dutchbr, Chairman^ 525 Manhattan Avenue, New York.
Abbott H. Thayer, Monadnock, New Hampshire.
John M. Swain, Portland, Maine.
Ralph Hoffmann, Belmont, Mass.
James H. Hill, New London, Conn.
William L. Baily, Ardmore, Pa.
Frank C. Kirkwood, Baltimore, Md.
T. Gilbert Pearson, Greensboro, N. C.
Robert W. Williams, Jr., Tallahassee, Fla.
Frank M. Miller, New Orleans, La.
Frank Bond, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Mrs. Florence Merriam Bailey, Washington, D. C.
Edward B. Clark, Chicago, Ills.
Mrs. Louise McGown Stephenson, Helena, Arkansas.
H. P. Attwater, Houston, Texas.
A. W. Anthony, Portland, Oregon.
Subcommittee on Laws.
Theodore S. Palmer, M. D., Washington, D. C*
A. O. U. Committee on Foreign Relations.
Frank M. Chapman, New York, N. Y.
Charles W. Richmond, M. D., Washington, D. C.
Theodore S. Palmer, M. D., Washington, D. C.
RuTHVEN Deane, Chicago, Ills.
William Dutcher, New York, N. Y.
National Committee of Aubudon Societies.
William Dutcher, Chairman^ 525 Manhattan Avenue, New York.
Subcommittee on Relations with Millinery Trade.
Witmer Stone, Philadelphia, Pa.
Frank M. Chapman, New York, N. Y.
Wiluam Dutcher, New York, N. Y.
158 DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection- [^
DIRECTORY OF AUDUBON SOCIETIES. 1903.
California. President, Albert K. Smiley, RedUnds ; SecreUurj, Mrs.
George S. Gay, Rediands.
Connecticut. President, Mrs. M. O. Wright, Fairfield ; Secretary, Mrs.
W. B. Glover, Fairfield.
Delaware. President, A. R. Spaid, 1819 Delaware Ave., Wilmington ;
Secretary, Mrs. W. S. Hilles, 904 Market St., Wilmington.
District of Columbia. President, Gen. G. M. Sternberg, U. S. A.«
Washington; Secretarjr, Mrs. J. D. Patten, 2213 R St, Washington.
Florida. President, L. F. Dobamerich, Maitland; Secretary, Mrs. I.
Vanderpool, Maitland.
Illinois. President, Ruthven Deane, 24 Michigan Ave., Chicago;
Secretary, Miss Mary Drummond, 208 West St., Wheaton.
Indiana. President, Stanley Coulter, Lafajrette; Secretary, William
Watson Woollen, Commercial Club, Indianapolis.
Iowa. President, Mrs. James B. Diver, Keokuk; Secretary, Mrs. L.
E. Felt, 524 Concert St., Keokuk.
Sckaller Audubon Society^ Iowa. President, Mrs. T. J. Akdrk,
Schaller ; Secretary, Miss J. E. Hamand, Schaller.
Kentucky. President, Mrs. Montgomery Merritt, Henderson ; Sec-
retary, Ingram Crockett, Henderson.
Louisiana, President, E. A. McIlhenny, Avery^s Island; Secretary,
Miss Anita Pring, 1449 Arabella St., New Orleans.
Maine. President, Prof. A. L. Lane, Waterville ; Secretary, Mrs. C.
B. Tuttle, Waterville.
Massachusetts. President, William Brewster, Cambridge ; Secretary,
Miss H. E. Richards, Society of Natural History, Boston.
Maryland. President, W. C. A. Ha.mmel, State Normal School, Balti-
more; Secretary, Miss A. W. Whitney, 715 St. Paul St., Baltimore.
Minnesota. President, John W. Taylor, St. Paul ; Secretary, Miss S.
L. Putnam, 124 Inglehart St., St. Paul.
La Ike City Audubon Society, Minnesota. President, Mrs. G. F. Benson,
Lake City ; Secretary, Mrs. C. A. Koch, Lake City.
Missouri. President, Walter J. Blakelv, St. Louis; Secretary,
Ai'GUST Rkksk, 2516 North 14th St., St. Louis.
Xebraska. President, Dr. Rohert H. Wolcott, Lincoln; Secretary,
Wilson TorT, Dunbar.
Nc-v Hampshire. President, Mrs. Arthir E. Clark, Manchester;
Secretary, Mrs. F. W. Batch klder, Manchester.
AVu' York. President, Morris K. Jksci», New York; Secretary. Miss
Emma II. LocKWoon, 243 West 75th St., New York.
i\ I' zv Jersey. President, Alexander CJilhert, Plainfield; Secretary.
.Miss JiLiA S. ScRiUNKR, 510 V.. VtoxxX St., Plainfield.
Xor/h Carolina. President J. Y. Joyncr. Raleigh; Secretary, T.
GiLHERT Pearson, Greensboro.
^ wf^] DuTCHER, Report of Committee on Bird Protection . 1 J 9
Okio. President, Wm. Hubbell Fishbr, 13 Wiggins Block, Cincin-
nati; Secretary, Mrs. D. Z. McClelland, 820 W. 9th St., Cincinnati.
Oklahoma, President, H. D. White, Enid ; Secretary, Mrs. Adblia
HoLCOMB, Enid.
Oregon. President, ; Secretary, Miss Gertrude Met-
calfe, 634 Williams Ave., Portland.
Pennsylvania. President, Witmer Stone, Academy of Natural Sci-
ences, Philadelphia; Secretary, Mrs. Edward Robins, 114 South 21st
St., Philadelphia.
Rhode Island. President, Prof. Alpheus S. Packard, Brown Uni-
rersity. Providence ; Secretary, Miss Martha R. Clarke, 89 Brown St.,
Providence.
South Carolina. President, Miss C. H. Poppenheim, 31 Meeting St.,
Charleston ; Secretary, Miss S. A. Sbiyth, 35 Legare St., Charleston.
Tennessee. President, ; Secretary, Mrs. C. C. Conner,
Ripley.
Vermont. President, Mrs. Frances B. Horton, Brattleboro; Secre-
tary, Mrs. Fletcher K. Barrows, Brattleboro.
Virginia. President, John B. Henderson, Jr., Washington, D. C.;
Secretary, Mrs. Mary G. Plant, Glencarlyn.
West Virginia (branch of Pennsylvania Society). President, Witmer
Stone, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia ; Secretary, Mrs. E.
Robins, 114 S. 21st St., Philadelphia.
Wisconsin, President, W. S. Marshall, 116 E. Gorham St., Madison ;
Secretary, Mrs. R. G. Thwaites, 260 Langdon St., Madison.
Wyoming, President, Frank Bond, Cheyenne ; Secretary, Mrs. N. R;
Davis, 2216 Ferguson St., Cheyenne.
i
CONTENTS.
The a. Q. V. Chki-I.hi- It> HhHM **>> In Pvna
N..i». ,_. -.t. - -.-.I. ..... r:- ....... ... 1.UM) luAHb, N- V, h, .. .1,-.— . ..-.....— .
Tvr UiAKt or A CtKliinat.^ Kcct. By OirlnA Fv Htnmf. Wtl- H
JtN EriiKHK- »r Hour ir tk* CaxUImi'W* Cm* lto'r>T. 1^ £lm Hmmrd R^tm.
<rtM m ....
Twuirrrni C°min~. .■> tus Akiui^.h n*aiiMBUiwir>' Ufioo. Br /ate tf. JT^*
■ GiRuiAI. KtiTJiJ — BiMdldd Ciuuiidi ol Ihc Blue* ml Sotoito P«w*»i — A L'a»«iU*. «
. n* MclUnXh ORititinlntml IIhK in; Thlnd Annwl Cnn
tor IS-.-.--.....
1-^ .lWr*..«l K. llll \I'K."
■ ■' lo WILLIAM I'l itHFH.
1" VirBK, N. V. FoTtisn Sob-
OfRNEY AKU JACKSON, i
THE AUK:
A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF
ORNITHOLOGY.
Vol. XX. April, 1903. No. 2
THE DOMESTIC AFFAIRS OF BOB-WHITE.
BY JOHN N. CLARK.'
To THE man who keeps his eyes and ears open, there are new
sources of entertainment and instruction bursting upon his vision
at every turn. They often come as surprises — for Nature, ever
proiific in resource, offers a new program at every interview.
Such were the thoughts that suggested themselves as I took the
pen to recount a little episode that afforded much entertainment
for me the past sununer.
I frequently observed during later June and early July a stately
Bob-white stationed on a post near at hand where at early morn
and fading day he called out with great energy his weather prog-
nostications with little favor to the haymakers, as if he were a
trusted employee of the Weather Bureau.
By the roadside in that immediate vicinity grow numerous
patches of what I call scrub. There are hazel scrub, wild rose
scrub, and blueberry and dwarf willow scrubs — annually mowed.
Mowing does not destroy or discourage them, but puts them in the
form so popular in Japan when practiced upon trees kept in plant
form by trimming and training. These scrubs, cut to stubs from
six to ten inches, renew their annual leaf and vigor and afford nice
^[This article has a sad interest, owing to the death of the author since the
manuscript was received for publication. See ' Notes and News * in the pres-
ent number of ' The Auk '.— Edd.]
162 Q,\.MiViy Domestic Affairs of Boh'Whit€, \kSt
runways for small birds and quadrupeds beneath their green cover,
and often a nice nesting place for Madam White, as I have several
times observed in the passing years. This year circumstances
detained the mowing till Tuesday, the fifth day of August. I
hesitate somewhat from fixing this as the exact date as I had no
interest at the time nor any thought of the subsequent interest
involved. I know it was Tuesday and am strongly impressed with
its correctness. Early in the afternoon I took a walk up the road
to inspect the progress of my employee and found him skillfully
clipping away the weeds and shrubbery that had sprung up by
the roadside. Almost his first casual remark was, " There is a
quail's nest in the shrubbery the other side of the road." A
quail's nest, thought I, pretty late in the season for Bol>white to
set up domestic affairs. But my curiosity led me to the spot and
a little inspection. Old Bob sprang up out of the shrub with
startling whir of wing and dropped into a small growth of bush a
few rods away. The nest was built in a scrub of blueberry bushes
that had been cut about ten inches from the ground year after
year, interwoven with the annual growth of grasses and weeds
pertaining to a wayside. The nest was a neat little bower, deftly
woven, covered and concealed. Only a few steps away was the
pviblic road with teams, pedestrians and even dogs passing every
hour of the day. But little recked Bob-white in his cozy nest
for, as 1 have already intimated, it was Old Bob had possession
and twelve, clean, white eggs. A moment's inspection sufficed to
satisfy my curiosity and I quietly withdrew to avoid any possible
diversion in the domestic affairs of the White family.
It was about this time, or shortly after, in crossing a field a few
rods back of this nest, I was startled to tind mvself in the midst of
a tlock of young birds, juvenile Bob-whites about the size of an
English Sparrow, upspringing on ever)' side and scurrj'ing in
every direction, evidently proud of their ability to take wing,
though of little use would that he to protect them from old Tabby's
|)aw had she been in my place. What attracted my special atten-
tion was the fact of only one old bird being with the flock of little
ones and that bird a female liob-white. I would add further that
this flock was observed several times in the following weeks and
always with one solitary guide and protector, and that one the
mother.
^^1903^] Clark, Domestic Affairs of Bob-^ kite, 1 63
Tuesday, the twelfth day of August, in passing the spot I
thought of the White family and turned aside for a moment's inter-
view. I found *01d Bob' still on guard, promptly responding,
relieving himself in haste from his nursery duties with evident
solicitude. It brought one matter of interest to my mind, the dic-
tum of a recent writer in one of our ornithological publications that
Old Bob never took upon himself any share in the domestic cares
and resp>onsibilities of his household, not even to the bringing an
occasional tidbit to the wife absorbed in household duties, yet here
he was faithfully discharging the whole duties of overseer, house-
keeper and wet nurse. And I i^ll add that during the whole
period of observation there was no appearance of Madam White
at the premises. The nineteenth found * Old Bob,' ever faithful,
unwearied in his devotion to the household and its cares, and my
interview was a very brief one.
The twenty-sixth day of August, I was thinking what a fine
thing it would be if I could catch * Old Bob ' as incubation was
complete and the babies cuddled together in their nursery just
ready to launch forth upon life's weary wanderings mid swarming
enemies. What a prize it would be for my camera ! But no such
good fortune awaited me and no change appeared in the household
affairs of the White family.
September second ; another month opens on the scene and it
occurred to me that if Old Bob should get out a brood they would
make poor broilers for the Dogs of War so soon to be let loose,
October first being only one month away. Old Bob burst upon
the scene with his usual vigor, the same startling whir of wings
to which my nerves could never get reconciled, dropped in his old
place and began to whine piteously. I peeped into the nest to find
everything unchanged.
" Poor Bob," said I, "right sorry I am for you. All these weary
weeks, in storm and sunshine, faithful to life's duty as you view it,
and all for naught"; and here I fell to blaming myself for the dis-
turbing interviews that might have wrought this disastrous end to
all his care, and I went away feeling the deepest sympathy and
regret for poor Bob.
My sympathy and regrets were all wasted. The morrow found
the nest deserted, and only empty shells neatly cut in halves, as if
severed by an expert with sharp tools, filled the nest.
164 Hksshaw^ £mper0r Giwse im Nawaii, [apt;
A recent author on ornithological subjects arranges a list of
birds into two classes, one, like the sparrows, that annually rear
two broods in the season; and one, including Bob-white, never
rearing but one. This little episode does not prove him incorrect
and yet there are points circumstantially convincing to my mind
that he was mistaken.
It was just one month after the events narrated above. Octo-
ber had come : the Nimrdds had put on cap and boots and the
fusillade had already begun, but not yet near. I was reading
quietly in my chair when I was startled by the heavy report of a
gun, fired evidently only a short distance away from my yard but
the scene invisible by intervening foliage. A little later I saw go
marching proudly by, a boy with a big gun in one hand and a big
male Bob-white in the other, great triumph sparkling in his eyes.
He probably feasted that night. Menu — Quail on toast, seasoned
with a mayonnaise of glory.
OCCURRENCE OF THE EMPEROR GOOSE
IN HAWAII.
BY H. W. HENSHAW.
The present season of 1902-03 bids fair to be a notable one as
regards the occurrence of North American birds in the Hawaiian
Islands. About the middle of October there occurred a heavy
northeast trade storm, and, coincident with it, an unusually heavy
flight of ducks and geese reached the island of Hawaii. Flocks of
the former, consisting of scores, and even of hundreds, were
reported from various points on the windward side. The ducks
were mostly of two species, viz., the Pintail {Dafiia acmta), and
the Shoveller (JSfiatuia dypeatd). Although these two species are
of annual occurrence upon all the islands of the group, where they
winter, they have not been known in such abundance upon the
island of Hawaii, not a favorite with ducks, for many years.
Among the flocks were doubtless not a few individuals of species
/
^tm^] Hbnshaw, Emperor Goose in Hawaii. 165
hitherto unknown to occur in the islands, but when killed these
usually fell into the hands of natives and of sportsmen from whom
next to nothing can be learned respecting the contents of their
game bags save that among them were strange ducks.
The capture of three " Black-headed Ducks " has been reported
from Puna and a photograph of two of these, taken after death
by Mr. H. E. Wilson, is before me as I write. From this I
identify them, with but little doubt, as the American Scaup Duck
{Aythya mariia nearcticd). Neither of the Scaups has hitherto
been reported from the group.
A fine specimen of the Red-breasted Merganser (^M, serrator)
fell into the hands of Mr. C. M. Walton of Pahala, Kau, by whom
it was preserved. This is the second recorded instance of the
occurrence of this duck in the archipelago, though there is reason
to believe that its presence here is not so very exceptional.
December 9, a specimen of Larus giaucescens, in superb juvenile
winter plumage, was shot near Hilo by Mr. John Rinehart. This
gull is known to occur in Hawaiian waters more often than any
other North American gull, being piloted down here from San
Francisco by both steamers and sailing vessels.
But the most interesting capture to be recorded is that of four
Emperor Geese {Phiiacte canagicd) at Kalapana, on the Puna
coast, December 12, by Mr. H. E. Wilson, who fortunately possessed
the interest and skill requisite to preserve all four. Two of the
birds I have seen. They are in superb winter plumage, and are
not only the first to be reported from the Hawaiian Islands but, if
I mistake not, from any locality anything like so far south as
latitude 19°. Several species of geese in small numbers have
found their way to the islands from time to time during the fall
migration, and during the present season small companies have
been reported here and there along the coast. No doubt it was in
company with other geese or with ducks that the present
wanderers were enticed to southern latitudes.
Such casual occurrences as those above noted — but few in
comparison with the many that are never chronicled — indicate the
manner in which birds may be introduced to new and distant
lands, and how the habit of annual winter migration to suitable
regions is begun.
1 66 Henshaw, Emperor Goose im Hawaii. F a|?
The habitual winter migration of ducks from the northwest
coast to the islands, as well as that of the plover, has unquestion-
ably been going on for many centuries, and had begun long before
the islands possessed human inhabitants to profit by the visits of
food birds. Yet no doubt the migration from America is very
recent as compared to the length of time most of the land birds
have been island residents.
At first thought it seems strange that, with the exception of the
Short-eared Owl — now a long time resident and even yet a casual
emigrant from the northwest — no west coast land birds have
found their way hither, or at any rate have become established in
the islands. The most probable explanation of the fact is that
when blown off the coast, as the land birds must frequently be,
and even when such strays join flocks of water birds on their way
hither, as no doubt they often do, their strength gives out long
before they reach port. Circumstances must needs be very excep-
tional when even so strong and hardy birds as woodpeckers can
fly two thousand miles without stopping, if indeed they can perform
the feat under any conceivable conditions. In the unlikely event
of the birds reachrng land after so prolonged and tremendous a
flight there remains the probability of their dying from exhaustion.
Nevertheless, the ancestral stock from which have sprung the
Meliphagidiii and the Muscicapidae, which are probably of Austra-
lian derivation, and the Drepanidid®, which may have come from
neotropical America, successfully solved what must have been
practically the same problem of prolonged flight over the ocean,
and why not such birds as the American Picidae, Fringillidxs and
Corvida;, to say nothing of other hardy and strong flying birds, not
one of which has a representative in the island avifauna?
In referring to the migration of the west coast water birds to
the archipelago I have elsewhere expressed the belief that, as time
went on, the number of American species wintering in the islands
was likely to increase, and that perhaps some might become per-
manent residents. I did not for the moment take into account th^
constantly increasing number of island sportsmen and gunners to
whom everything that flies is game, and who are not only sure to
prevent the possibility of additional species locating on the islands
but who threaten the existence of several species k>ng resident.
^*i^^^l Fisher, Preserving Equilibrinm by Use of One Wing. 1 67
It is much to be regretted that the few species which are legitimate
objects of pursuit by sportsmen, like the Hawaiian Goose, Hawaiian
Duck, and the Plover and Turnstone, are becoming scarcer and
scarcer every year. Yet it is at least to be said that these birds
serve as food, and hence are not entirely wasted. No such excuse,
however, can be urged in defence of the slaughter of such birds as
the Hawaiian Stilt, Night Heron, Mud Hen {Gallinuia), and Coot
(Fuii^d), These birds, though occasionally eaten by the natives
and Portuguese, are too * gamy ' for most palates, and are usually
shot and thrown away, with the natural result that they have been
quite exterminated in many localities and are becoming scarcer
and scarcer in all districts.
PRESERVING EQUILIBRIUM BY THE USE OF
ONE WING.
BY WILLIAM HUBBELL FISHER.
PiaU VII,
I WAS at the Brown Palace Hotel, in the city of Denver, Colo-
rado, from March 14, 1902, until the 21st day of the following May,
and occupied a room on the seventh floor, about ninety feet above
the pavement of the street. There I quite frequently fed the
House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus frontalis) of the neighbor-
hood with bird seed spread upon my window sill. These birds
became quite familiar. Often as many as twelve or fourteen of
them were upon the sill at once. As the spring advanced, they
came in pairs, and it frequently happened that a hungry pair
having taken possession of the seed would drive off all the others
until thpy had satisfied their appetites. In driving off the other
birds, this pair would often meet with great opposition, and fre-
quently severe combats occurred, often in mid air. I have pictures
of the birds one darting down upon another as a hawk does upon
his prey. At other times, the possessors of the locality would
drive the intruders to the edge of the sill, and would often push off
the intruder. Two of my instantaneous photographs reveal the
1 68 Yisw^K, Preserving Bquilibrium by Ut€ of Omt Wimg. [jf^
fact that when a bird — an intruder — had been thus driven to the
edge of the sill and was being pushed off, he used one wing to
keep himself from being forced into the air, the other wing not
being in use.
On such occasions, the attacking bird would rush at the intruder
and drive him almost off, and push him to the edge of the sill, and
then as quick as a flash, in a nonchalant way, return and get ready
to eat again the bird seed.
I have the pleasure of presenting a copy of one of the photo-
graphs thus taken, which illustrates such use of a single wing.
The photograph was taken with a focal plane shutter. The move-
ment of the wing must have been very rapid, as I did not observe
it with the naked eye. The bird is evidently using the air to pre-
vent its l)eing forced off the sill somewhat as a man would use his
arm against a post when being forced down a declivity.' In illus-
tration of this, I submit a photograph of two boys, one pushing
the other down a declivity in Eden Park, Cincinnati.
I am aware that in the case of pigeons, where two males are
tightint;, the birds use only the wing next to their opponent.
They strike their opponent over the back or head with the single
■wing with great force, the wing being returned with wonderful
celerity to its place at the side, the other wing not being in use.
but I have never before observed the use of a single wing to pre-
vent the i)ircl from being thrown into an abyss, as in the present
instance.
I have ancnher photograph of a House Finch, when driven to
the sill, using the outer wing only for the same purpose. In this
second instance, the outer wing is the left one.
Vol. XX
1903
J BoNHOTB, Migration at some Bahama Lighthouses, 1 69
BIRD MIGRATION AT SOME OF THE BAHAMA
LIGHTHOUSES.
BY J. LEWIS BONHOTE, M. A., F. Z. S. L., M. B. O. U.
The birds dealt with in this paper from Cay Lobos were
received in two consignments and cover the period of twelve
months, from August, 1900, to May, 1901. Forty species are in-
cluded, bringing the total number of species observed on the Cay
to 54, which, when we consider that the Cay is but a bare rock of
a few acres, standing well out at sea, is no inconsiderable number
for observations extending over such a short period. It is to be
regretted that Mr. Thompson has been removed to another station
so that we are unlikely to receive further consignments from this
locality; but Mr. Thompson has already sent a small collection
from his new station, which is dealt with in this paper, and we
may therefore hope to receive many further records from him.
Of the birds procured one of the most noticeable is Aramus
giganteus^ but from the direction of their flight, and the time of
year (28th Jan.) it is probable that they were merely moving
along the coast of Cuba, and not on any direct migration. For-
fhyrio tnartinica occurs as a solitary wanderer, most probably,
considering the lateness of the hour (4 a. m.), from some northern
region. Helmintherus swainsoni^ Dendrceca ccerulea^ Sylvania
mitrata, Pyranga rubra, and Etnfidonax acadicus are recorded for
the first time within the limits of the Bahamas.
Looking at the collection from a Cuban point of view we may
notice the occurrence of Dendrotca evelynce, which has not yet,
as far as we are aware, been observed in Cuba, but which,
from the occurrence of this specimen, probably occasionally
straggles there.
As regards the nights on which large movements were observed,
the 20th Oct. and the 22nd Nov. were those on which most species
were procured on the fall migration, and in both cases the wind
was northeast. October seems to be the chief migratory month,
as specimens were got on every night that the elements proved
favourable.
On the spring migration the nights of the 15th and 21st March,
I yo BoNHOTE, Migration at some Bahama Ligktkomses, [a "^
the 15th April and the 13th May were the richest in variety of
species, and on three of these occasions the wind was southeast.
On the 15th April, however, the night in which 17 different species
were procured, the wind was north-northwest Although we
think it is well to draw attention to these facts, too much stress
should not be laid on the direction of the wind, as the number of
birds striking is probably far more dependent upon the state of
the atmosphere (/. ^., rainy, misty, cloudy, etc.) than on the actual
direction of the wind. In the cases under consideration it will be
noticed that, with the exception of the 13th May, Mr. Thompson
records rain or mist in every instance ; it may be well also to
notice that the birds invariably come up to the light against the
wind and strike on the lee side of the antern.
As regards species which were observed but of which no speci-
mens were sent, we notice Swallows on the 20th and 31st August ;
Kingfisher (CeryU alcyon) 21st August and ist Sept.; Rice Birds
{Dolichonyx) ist and 8th Sept., and Mr. Thompson estimates that
on the last mentioned date the flock consisted of at least 200
individuals. A Barn Owl also was seen on the ist September.
Flocks of small birds visited the island on the 4th and 9th Sept.,
28th Oct. and 27th November,
On the 20th April a large migration took place, the greater
bulk of which were small Passeres, but it also included Fighters
{Tyranttus) and Rice Birds (Dolichonyx), The last spring move-
ment recorded is on May 10, when a small flock of Passeres
rested on the Cay.
There remains only for me to give my best thanks to Messrs.
Thompson and Solomon for all the trouble they have taken and
to hope that they may send us many more equally interesting
consignments.
Cay Lobos Light.
Turdus mustelinuB.
No. 8. a. 15th April, 1901.
Turdus fuscescens.
No. 15. a, 15th April, 1901.
Mniotilu varia.
No. 2. a^b, 29th Oct., 1900.
No. 4. c-f, 2i8t March, 1901.
^^i^T BoNHOTE, Migration at some Bahama Lighthouses. 1 7 1
No* 5» g^^' 23rd Marcli, 1901.
No. 3. /. 3rd April, 1 901.
N06. 8 and 15. h-m, 15th April, 1901.
Parula americana.
No. 2. a-€, 20th Oct., 1900.
No. 6. f, 29th Oct., 1900.
No. 9. g^ h, 22nd Nov., 1900.
No. 4. I-/. 2i8t March, 1901.
No. 5. m-o. One male, two females, 23rd March, \^
No. 6. /. One female, 25th March, 1901.
No. 4. q. nth April, 1901.
No. 6. r. One male, 15th April, 1901.
No. II. 5-ir. Two males, one female, 13th May, 1901.
No. 12. %K One female, 14th May, 1901.
Helmintherus swainsoni.
No. 5. a^ b, 23rd March, 1901. No. 6. c. 26th March, 1901.
This is the first record of this species within the Bahama area.
Dendrcsca coronata.
No. 9. a, 22nd Nov., 1900. Struclc at midnight.
No. 2. b, 14th Feb., 1901. No. 5. </, e. 23rd, March, 1901.
No. 4. c. 2 1 St March, 1 901.
Dendroeca palmarum.
No. 6. a. 29th Oct., 1900. No. 5. g. 23rd March, 1901.
No. 7. b-d, 30th Oct., 1900. No. 8. h. 15th April, 1901.
No. 9. «. 22nd Nov., 1900.
Dendroeca caerulea.
No. 6. a, b, 26th April, 1901. Hitherto only recorded from Cuba
and Grand Cayman in the West Indies.
Dendroeca discolor.
No. 5. a-c. Males, 23rd March, 1901.
No. 8. d-g. Four males, 15th April, 1901.
No. II. h. One male, 13th May, 1901.
Dendroeca tigrina.
No. 2. a. One male, 20th Oct., 1900.
No. 9. b. 22nd Nov., 1900.
No. 2. c-€. Three females, 14th Feb., 1901.
No. 8. y, g. One male, one female, 15th April, 1901.
No. 5. i. One male, 21st April, 1901.
172 BoNHOTR, Migration at sotrn^ BaMama Ligrktkam$4s. f Apr!
Denditsca c«niletcens.
No. 2. a. One male, 20th Oct., 1900.
No. 5. b. One male picked up on the cay, 28th Oct., 1900.
No. 5. c-€. One male, two females, 23rd March, 1901.
No. 7. /. One male, 14th April, 1901.
No. 8. g^ A. Males, 15 April, 1901.
No. 9. i. Male, 19th April, 1901.
No. 12. k. Female, 14th May, 1901.
Dendrcsca dominica.
No. 4. a-d. 2i8t March, 1901. No. 5. e-f, 23rd March, 1901.
Dendrceca striata.
No. 2. a. Female, 20th Oct., 1900.
No. 15. 6, c. Males, 15th April, 1901.
No. 10. d-f. 10th May, 1901.
No. II. g, h. One male, one female, 13 May, 1901.
Seiurus aurocapillus.
No. 9. a. 22nd Nov., 1900. No. 11. e, 13th May, 1901.
No. 15. b'd. 15th April, 1901.
Seiurus motacilla.
No. 6. a. 26th March, 1901. Struck the Light at 3 A. M.
Seiurus novel>oracensis.
No. 7. r/. 30th Oct., 1900. No. 5. b. nth April, 1901.
Oporonis agilis.
No. 10. a. 9th May, 1901. Struck at 7.30 A. M. There are only two
previous records of this species in the Bahamas ; the first from Cay Sal,
where Mr. Winch met with it on migration about the 14th May, 1891
(Auk, Vol. VIII. p. 352). and the second obtained by myself at Nassau
during the autumn migration on the 12th Oct., 1898.
Geothlypis trichas.
No. 2. a. One male, 29th Oct., 1900. Struck at midnight.
No. 6. b, Male, 29th Oct., 1900.
Vol. XXI
1903
J BoNHOTS, Migration at tome Bahama Lighthouses, I ^^
Sylvania mitraUu
No. 6. a, 15th April, 1901.
Setophaga ruticilla.
No. 2. a-c. One male, two females, 20th Oct., 1900.
No. 7. d, Male, 14th April, 1901.
No. II. e, 13th May, 1901. Struck at 2 a. m.
Vireo flavifrons.
No. 5. a, 23rd March, 1901. Struck at 11.20 p. m. This species is
said by Corj (Cat. B. W. Indies, p. 116, 1892) to have occurred on New
Providence but I have not been able to find a copy of the reference. (A.
H. Jennings, John Hopkins Univ. Cir., Vol. VII, p. 39). I have, however,
recently obtained a single specimen myself on Andros.
Vireo crassirostris.
No. 5. a, 23rd March, 1901.
Pyranga rubra {Linn.).
No. 8. a. Female, 15th April, 1901. A certain amount of confusion
seems to exist with regard to the synonymy of this species, and a mistake
occurred in my previous paper on the birds of New Providence (Ibis,
1899, p. 518). In that paper a bird is recorded in the introduction as P.
testiva and occurs in the text as P. rubra. That specimen is the P. eestiva
(Gmel.) of the * British Museum Catalogue,' which is the same as the P.
rubra of Cory, * Birds of the West Indies,* p. 85 and * Cat. W. Ind. Birds,'
p. 114. The specimen under consideration, however, is the P. rubra
(Linn.) of the B. M. Cat., recorded by Cory as P. erythromelas (Vie ill.)
in his • Birds of the West Indies,' p. 86. This is therefore the first record
of this species within the Bahama area.
Cyanospiza cyanea.
No. 8. a, 15th April, 1901.
Tyrannua griseus.
No. 9. a. a4th April, 1901. Six specimens of * Fighters,* presumably
of this tpedet, inhabited the Cay for three days, March 24th-26th.
I y^ BoNHOTS, Migration at tome Bahama Ligktkomses. \j^
Empidonax acadicus [=: virescens].
No. 8. a. 15th April, 1901. The first record from the Bahamas.
Dorichia evelyne.
No. 8. a. 15th April, 1901. The occurrence of this bird so near the
Cuban coast points to its occasional occurrence on that island.
Spyrapicus varius.
No. 4. a. 2 1st March, 1901. This specimen must have been a verjr
bright male; the white tips and the outermost spots of the primaries are
tinged with pinkish and the white margins of the outer tail-feathers are
of a dull pinkish brown.
Columba leucocephala.
No. 10. a. 2i6t Dec, 1900. Struck the tower at 12.20 a. m.
Charadrius fulvus.
No. 4. a. 25th Oct., 1900.
Strepsilas interpres.
No. 8. a. 14th Nov., 1900. Shot on the Cav.
Tringoides macularius.
No. 10. a. 25th April, 1901.
Ardea virescens.
No. 2. (u b. 20th Feb., 1901.
No. 8. c. 22nd April, 1901. ".Vhout 30 arrived on the night ot the
jotli and all left the follo\vin«]^ dav with the exception of one, which wa*
shot on the 22nd." — T. R. T.
I have compared these specimens with the individual I obtained at
Nassau in 1S98 and I find that that specimen should be referred lo A.
bakamcfists of Brewster and not to this species as erroneouslv rect)rdcd
(Ibis, IVS99, p. 519).
Nyctiardea violacea.
No. 3. a, 23rd (^ct., 19CX). Immature.
No. 4. b» 2i8t March, 1901. A tine adult.
^wOT^l ^OJUHOTR^ AfigraiioH at some Bahama Ligkikouses. I^C
Aramus giganteus.
No. I. a-^c. 28th Jan., 1901. Nine examples were seen in all; they
came from the N. W. and left going S. E. This is the first record within
the Bahama area.
Porphyrio martinica.
No. I. a. 19th Oct, 1900. Struck at 4 A. m.
*Porzana Carolina.
No. I. a. 19th Oct., 1900.
Sterna cantiaca [acu/lavida'\. Blackshank.
No. 12. fl-c. 17th Jan., 1901.
No. I. d, 23rd Jan., 1901. This species and 5. dougal/i sleep on the
Cay whenever a strong breeze is blowing.
Sterna dougallL Redshank.
No. II. a-c. 26th Dec, 1900. Shot on the Cay.
No. 12. d, 14th May, 1901. Struck at 1.15 A. m.
Sterna antillarum.
Mr. Thompson has sent me some eggs of this species laid on the Cny.
Sterna fuliginosa.
No. 5. a, 23rd March, 1901. I also received eggs of this species
from a Cay about thirty miles from the station.
Extract) from ScktdmUt.
Dil«
N^..,m^
Wwlur
Wind
19OCI..190O.
P. marlinica, P. Carolina
Fog Ji rain
S. W. I
M- z;iria. P. amtritane.
Rainy
N. N. E. 3
U. tigrina^ D enruU-
ic€Hi, D. itnala, G. Iri-
ekat. S. ruticilU
jj " "
N. viMatea
Clear
E.6
M ■■ "
C.fi,lvu<
Rainy
N. E.6
D. (arulrutns
19 " "
P. awuricana. D. faima-
"
-
30 " "
D. paima'rum. S. nazfoora-
14 Nov., "
S. iHliTfris
MUty
N."e.5
S.
P. amrricana. D.corauattt.
D. palmarum, D. ligrU
no. S. aKrocafillHI
Mi.ty
N.E.
s.
21 Dec, "
C. Ituioftphala
Rain & fog
S. W.3
s.
i8 Jan.. 1901.
J*, gigaitltus
N. W.4
.4 Feb.. •'
0. CBTomala, D. tigrina
Rain ft mist
S. W. 1
N. W.
N. W. 4
21 Mar.. "
M.varia.P,<iwi,rUaHa,D,
ccTBnala. D. diiminiea,
S. variut, /V. vMnca
Rain
S. E. 4
N. W.
23 " "
naM. D. palmarum, D
diiiolvr, D. cvrultitrni,
D, dBminica, P'. Jh\i-
from, y. traairoiiHi,
S. fuligiufsa
Foggy
S. E. 1
S.ft W.
,j « ■!
P. amiriiana, H. maiH-
S. K. z
s. w.
ioai. S. mftitid Ut
3 Apr- "
St. vuria
N. W. 3
11 " "
N. W. 3
U " "
U. itrruUifem, S. rulicilla
N.n'^.3
T. mutltliHui. T. Juiti-
Mi».y
S. K,
cfHi.M.varia. P.amtri
e.ina.D.fslmarum. D.
orrn/ia. I) striata, D-
dii»<l,'r, V. tigri«a. D.
nrruleitiHs, S. aiirir-
rafi/iui, .V. ntK-e^ra-
ffnsii. .S. milnilo. P.
ru^ta, C. cy.iHta, k.
a<adiiMi, D. fvtiyna
19 " "
D i.rruIiM<m
Misty
s: E. s
N.W.
D. Hgrina.
N.N. W.4
jj " "
A. viri»iH>.
14 " "
T. ir-i'lf,.
9 M»j, "
D ilrtala. O. aiilh.
Cloudy
S. E. 1
13 " "
/■, amiriolHU. D, diicoloT.
Clear
S. E. 1
D. itriata. S. aurtva-
pillui. S. rutirilla.
.4 " "
P. am,'>iafM, D. csruU-
~
^^W^l BONHOTX, Migration ot spmt Bahatma Lighthouses, 1 77
The Bird Rock CoNsioim xnt.
Mr. Thompson having been trtntferred to the above light laat autumn
I have much pleasure in tabulating below the results of the first consign-
ment from his new station.
Bird Rock Light, situated in Lat. 22^50' N., Long. 74^15' W., marks
the northeastern limit of the Crooked Island Passage and is on a small caj
lying just off Crooked Island. It is, of course, too early to speak defi-
nitely as yet, but. as might be expected, it does not appear to lie on any
great migration route, and the few specimens captured during the fall of
last year are solitary stragglers, with the exceptioi\ of a flock of Coccyxus
americamMs which struck the light in some numbers on the night of the
15th October.
Margaropa fuscatus.
No. 5. 14th Nov., 1901. One specimen struck at 9.50 p. m.
Dendrcsca striata.
No. 4. Several specimens, adults and young, i6th Oct.
Vireo calidrls.
No. I. 14th Sept. Struck at 5.15 p. m.
Coccyxus americanus.
No. 3. 12 specimens, 15th Oct.
Zenaidura macrura.
No. 2. 29th Nov. Shot on the cay.
Chamsepelia passerina.
No. I. One specimen, i8th Sept.
Porzana Carolina.
No. 3. One specimen, 15th Oct., 1901.
Date
Name of Bird
Weather
Wind
Side of
light struck
Sept, 1 90 1.
C. passerina
V, calidris
Misty
U
S. W. 2
S. E. 3
N. E.
>ct, "
C. americanus^ P. Carolina
Rain & mist
S. 5
N.
« i(
D, striata
Misty
W. 5
E.
lov., "
M. fuscatus
Clear
N. E. 2
N. W.
i< i<
Z. macrura
Mist & rain
X. by E. 5
1^8 Ho'SHOTK^ Mi^^raiion at some Bahama Li'ifktkomses, \j£
The Cay Sal Consignments.
From the Cay Sal Light I have received, through the kindness of Mr.
J. S. Solomon, two small consignments, the one covering the spring
migration of 1901 and the other the autumn and winter movements of
1901-02.
The lighthouse of Cay Sal is situated on the westernmost point of the
Cay Sal Bank in Lat. 23° 55' N., Long. 80^25' W., and lies nearly midway
between Florida and the north coast of Cuba. During the year covered
by the schedules no great movements appear to have been observed, most
of the birds arriving singly or in twos and threes; the greatest rush
recorded took place on the 13th of March and was made up of four or fi«-e
small species of Passeres, which commenced striking about 2 a. m. and
continued until dawn. Manv of these birds remained on the cav three
days before continuing their journey.
The only other large movement took place, curiously enough, on the
15th December, a time when, as a rule, but little migration is to be looked
for ; as in the previous rush the species represented were much the same ;
they commenced to strike at 10 p. m. but ceased about 5 A. m. and very
few were seen on the cay the next day.
The other point of note is the occurrence on two occasions of the
Purple Gallinule (P. marttnica) which is probably therefore a regular
migrant to the Bank.
Mniotilta varia.
No. I. (lib. 13th March, 1901.
Parula americana«
No. I. a-li. Six males, two females, 13th March, 1901.
Helminthophila bachmant
No. I. a. 13th March, 1901.
Dendrceca coronata.
No. I. a. 13th March, 1901. No. i. b~t\ 15th Dec, 1901.
Dendrceca palmarum.
No. I. a-f. 13th March, 1901. No, i. g, k, 15th Dec., 1901.
G eothlypis. trichas.
No. I. a-f. Four males, two females, 13th March, 1901.
No. I. g. One female, 15th Dec, 1901.
Ammodramus savannarum.
No. I. a-k. 15th Dec^i90i.
^f^^^J BoNiiOTK, Migration at som€ Bahama Lighthouses. I yo
Dolichonyx oiyzivorus.
No. 3. a-c. Three males in full plumaige, iSih March, 1901.
Coccyzus americanus. Rain Crow.
No. 2. a. 17th March, 1901. This is the same species as that previ-
ously recorded (Auk, 1901, p. 148) as C. minor from Cay Lobos but not
the same as C minor maynardi from Nassau.
Porphyrio martinica.
No. 5. a, 24th April, 1901.
No. 2. b. 9th Feb., 1902. Struck the lantern at 11.30 p. m.
Sterna fuliginosa. Egg Bird.
No. 4. a, i8th April, 1901. "These birds breed on the Cay every
year, when they gather by thousands from May to August." — J. S. S.
Extracts from Schedules,
Date
Name of Bird
Weather
Wind
Side of
light struck
i3Mar., 1901.
Af. varia^ P. americana^
H. bachmani^ D. coro-
natOf D. palmarum^ G.
trichas
Cloudy
E. S. E. 5
N.&N.E.
17 " "
28 " "
1 8 Apr., "
24 " "
C. americanus
D. oryzivorus
S. fuliginosa
P, martinica
Cloudy
Cloudy
Cloudy
Cloudy
N. E. 5
S.s
E. S. E. 6
N.W. 4
—
1 5 Dec., "
D. coronata^ D. palma-
rum^ G^ trichas^ A.
savannarum
Cloudy
N.N.W.5
S. E.
9 Feb., 1902.
P. martinaca
Cloudy &
squally
N. E. 6
S.
1 80 Ray, Land Birds of Lako Vallty, Cat. \^
LApr.
A LIST OF THE LAND BIRDS OF LAKE VALLEY.
CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA MOUNTAINS,
CALIFORNIA.
BY MILTON S. RAY.
Plaits VIII and IX.
The following notes are the result of two seasons I have spent
in Lake Valley, — from June 4 to 20 in 1901, and from June 16 to
July 3 in 1902. My brother William R. Ray has accompanied me,
and in 1902 Olof Heinemann joined us. I had the pleasure of
meeting Mr. Loren E. Taylor in 1901 and Messrs. Chester Barlow,
Henr>^ R. Taylor, W. W. Price, and F. M. Willard in 1902, at
various points in the region, all of whom are well known workers
in this locality. The observations of Messrs. Wilfred H. Osgood,
R. H. Beck, and Forrest Hanford have also added a number of
species to the list. Liberal extracts have been taken from the
' Land Birds of the Placerville-Lake Tahoe Stage Road ' by
Chester Barlow (Condor, Vol III, No. 6).
A very small portion of Lake Valley lies in Nevada, as the State
line turns a little north of here and runs southeast across the
mountains. The valley is about 15 miles bng and 8 miles wide.
On the north it is bounded by Lake Tahoe, while on all other
sides it is surrounded by rugged, snow-capped mountain ranges.
The j^rincipal peaks are: Tallac on the west, rising to 9785 feet;
further west and to the south snowy Pyramid attains 10,030 and
Crystal 10,015 f*-*<-^t. while on the eastern range Job*s and FreeKs
Peaks have an altitude of 10.637 and 10,900 feet respectively.
Lakes are numerous, there being a score of them between Mount
Tallac and Pyramid Peak at altitudes varying from 6400 to 8500
feet. Star Lake, the only one on the east, is one of the highest in
the world, the altitude beini; about 9000 feet. It usually remains
covered with a thick coat «>f ice until the end of June, and is a
great resort for Clarke Nutcrackers and other birds of the Hud-
son ian /.one.
The altitude of Lake Valley is a little above that of Lake
Tahoe. which is 6220 feet, and for the most part the valley is level.
^wf*] ^^^' ^^^ ^"^ ^^ ^*' Vallty, Cat, l8l
though hilly adjacent to the mountain sides. It presents six dis-
tinct types of country.
(i.) The major portion is sandy, more or less thickly wooded
with pine, tamarack, sagebrush and the broad-leaved wild sun-
flower. The majority of the timber on the eastern half is second
growth.
(3.) There are also large areas of fertile grassy meadows along
the numerous streams whose banks are fringed with willow, aspen
and other trees.
(3.) At the mouth of the Little Truckee River, called Row-
lands, is a marsh extending about three miles along the lake shore
and from one to three miles inland. The above three types of
country lie in the Transition Zone.
(4.) Portions of the hillsides are very rocky, sparsely wooded,
but thickly covered with the thorny buck brush, manzanita, and
wild beach. This district lies in the Canadian Zone.
(5.) On the mountain sides are dense forests of massive firs,
balsam, pine, and tamarack. Picturesque lakes, rushing torrents,
and foaming waterfalls characterize this portion of the country,
the lower part of which belongs to the Canadian Zone, and above
8000 feet to the Hudsonian Zone.
(6.) The last type is the barren rocky areas above the timber
line on the various mountain peaks, or the Alpine Zone.
The principal points of the region are :
• Altitude.
Lakeside (State Line) 6220
6220
6220
6220
6700
Bijou (P. O.) 2 miles west of Lakeside, on lake shore
Rowlands, 4 " " " " " " "
Tallac (P. O.) 7 " " " " " « »*
Glen Alpine, 14 " " " " a rocky gorge
Sierra House, 2| miles southeast of Lakeside, in Lake Valley 6300
Mejer's Station, 7 " south " " " " " 6400
Summit, 12 " southwest*' " on the ridge 7600
Phillip's SUtion 14 " " «* " " « «« 6900
The weather in the valley is erratic. In summer magnificent
thunderstorms, followed by a downpour of rain, hail, and occasion-
ally light snow, are common while in a few hours the sun will be
shining and the sky clear. The climate in general, however, is
cold in the morning and evening and rather warm at midday.
Bird life in general is varied and numerous, in striking contrast
1 82 Ray, Land Birds of LaH Valley, Cal. [jfj^^
to places west of the summit, like Echo, Slippery Ford, and River-
ton. This is no doubt due to the fact that species of many zones
occur here, owing to the diversified character of the country. The
breeding season is very early for the altitude of 6220 feet, it being
about the same as Slippery Ford, west of the summit, at 4000 feet
elevation.
It is a noticeable fact that even 500 or 1000 feet make a differ-
ence in nesting dates, allowing for the usual variation. For in-
stance, at Bijou on Lake Tahoe, on June 7, eggs oijunco hyanalis
thurberi were well along in incubation, and by June 15 most nests
contained young. At Phillip*s Station eggs slightly incubated
were found June 16, and on July 3, 4 and 5 we observed young
birds flying about at Wright's Lake and various other places on
this mountain plateau ; while at 9000 feet, on July 6, while ascend-
ing Pyramid Peak, two nests of eggs were found in which incuba-
tion had just commenced. The lateness of the season also delays
nesting, but only of certain species, it having little effect on birds
breeding in protected situations, like woodpeckers, bluebirds and
chickadees.
List of Species.*
17. Oreortyx pictus plumiferus. Painted Partridge. — Rather
scarce on the floor of the valley although a number were seen near Tallac
in June, 190 1. It is common on the mountain sides, especially on the
road to Star Lake.
iS. Dendragapus obscurus fuliginosus. Sooty Grousb.— This bird
is more often heard than seen. It is not uncommon on the ranges tur-
roiindinp: Lake \alley. On July 4. 1902. on the road to Pyramid Peak, a
parent with youni; about the size of a Valley (^iiaiJ, was flushed from the
brush aloii;:^ the road. In her solicitude for the young she could h^ve
been hit with a drivinj( wliip. Mr. I'rice slates they remain in these high
altitudes all tlie year, and aUo lecords a set of seven eggs, well advanced
in iniiihation. found at (Jlen Alpine, June 7, 1900.
19. Zenaidura macroura. M<»i km\<. Dovk — Common, ettpecially
about IJijon. 1 am itulintd totliink these birds ilo not breed here until
late in |id\. as not \\ itlist;nuliiiL; tluir alnnidance I found no nest*.
' Asterisk sij;nilirs ski:i t.ikm
Sixteen water birds h.ivt.- I> •••ii li-N'r-l, s > this list siarts with No. i-.
^°iw^] ^^^' ^''*^ ^'''* ^/^«** Valley, Cal. 1 83
20. Cathartes aura. Turkey Vulture. — A common species in the
valley ; a number were seen almost every day.
21. Accipiter veloz rufilatus. Western Sharp-shinned Hawk. —
Not uncommon about Lake Valley ; in fact all the birds of prey were far
more numerous here than at any point on the trip.
22. Accipiter cooperi. Cooper Hawk. — Observed about Glen Alpine
Springs by Mr. W, W. Price, and also at the base of Pyramid Peak, where,
he states, they no doubt breed.
23. Accipiter atricapillus striatulus. Western Goshawk. — Seen
near Pyramid Peak in June and July, 1897, by Mr. Price where, he states,
they undoubtedly breed.
24. Buteo borealis calurus. Western Red-tailed Hawk. — The
most common raptore in the region. I noticed it every day on various
rambles. A field glass is very handy for identifying these birds when at
a great height.
25. Aquila chrysaStos. Golden Eagle. — Observed about Glen
Alpine by Mr. Price, and about Pyramid Peak and Mt. Tallac, where it
nests on rocky ledges.
26. Falco sparverius deserticolus.* Desert Sparrow Hawk. — This
bird is rather scarce in Lake Valley. During the first week of June, 1901,
one was shot on the Bijou camp grounds. Seen about Mt. Tallac and at
Pyramid Peak by Mr. Price, where he found a nest at 9000 feet on July 5,
1897.
27. Nyctala acadica. Saw-whet Owl. — A single specimen, shot by
Mr. A. S. Bunnell at Glen Alpine in July, 1898.
28. Bubo virg^nianus saturatus. Dusky Horned Owl. — We saw a
Horned Owl, probably this variety, near Forni's, at the base of Pyramid
Peak, on July 5, 1902.
29. Glaucidium gnoma. Pigmy Owl. — Mr. Price shot three at Glen
Alpine on August 10, 1900; one an adult female, the others young of the
year.
30. Ccryle alcyon. Belted Kingfisher. — Fairly' common along the
lake shore between Bijou and Rowlands, and it probably nests in the
sandy bank which forms an unbroken line between these two points.
31. Dryobates villosus hyloscopus. Cabanis Woodpecker. — Mr.
L. E. Taylor secured two specimens at Fallen Leaf Lake on Sept. 2, 1901.
I also noticed this bird occasionallv about Rowlands.
32. Xenopicus albolarvatus. White-headed Woodpecker. -7- This
woodpecker and Colaftes cafer collaris are the only species of this fam-
ily which can be really called common in Lake Valley. The male is an
attractive bird, with his glossy black coat and white hesid. They are
especially fond of the grub of a large beetle found in newly-dead tama-
racks, and as these are also the principal bait used for catching the
famous Tahoe trout, the experienced fisherman looks for a trunk this
bird has recently tapped. The bird breeds commonly in Lake Valley*
nesting in dead pines and tamaracks from 5 to 25 feet up. By June i
most nests contained young in various stages.
184 Ray, Land Birds of Lake VmiUy, CmL [^
33. Picoidet tenuifostris. Sebrra Thrbb-tobd Woodpbckkk. — Mr.
W. W. Price records two joung shot at the head of Glen Alpine gorge
July, 1898, and a pair near Pyramid Peak, August, 1896.
34. Sphjrrapicua thyroideua. Williamson Sapsucxul — Noted as
nesting at the base of Pyramid Peak by Mr. Chester Barlow. Mr. L. E.
Taylor collected an immature female at Cascade Lrake on August 8.
35. Ceophloeua pileatua abieticolm. Northkrk Pilbatkd Wood-
PBCKBR. — Mr. Taylor collected a male at Gilmore Springs, near Tallac,
Sept. 3, 1901.
36. Melanerpes torquatua. Lbwis Woodpbckul. — Mr. R. H. Beck
records it as common and breeding about Bijou in the summer of 1896.
Personally I have not obsenred it in the r^ion.
37. Colaptea cafer coUaria. Rkd-shaftbd Flickul. — A common
species, nesting at various heights in dead pines in LakcTValley and on
the mountain sides. All nests examined during June, 1901 and 1903, con-
tained young.
38. Phalaenoptilua nuttallii califomicua. Dusky Pooiiwill. — Mr.
Taylor collected a female at Meyer*s Station on Sept. 3, 1901.
39. Chordeilea virginianua. Nighthawk. — The Nighthawk is
extremely common, and only on cloudy days when they fly low is one
able to realize the abundance of these birds. I noticed at least 100 In one
band on the road to Star Lake, darting back and forth in what was
evidently a good feeding ground. A single set of two eggs is recorded
by Mr. Price as being found on a bare rock near Suzy Lake late in July,
but where the thousands of Nighthawks breed is still a mystery. I have
never found a nest nor an indication of one, and probably the reason is
the birds do not start to breed until the end of July or later.
40. Calypte anna. Anna Hummingbird. — Mr. Price records a
female, evidently a straggler, as being shot near Pyramid Peak, July, 189&
41. Selaaphorus platycercua. Broad-tailbd Hummingbiiii>. —
Recorded as a rather rare summer visitant at Lake Tahoe in Grinneirs
*' Check-list of California Birds.*
42. Selasphorus rufua. Rufous Hummingbird. — Mr. W. W. Price
notes this bird as common and nesting about Glen Alpine. I also saw it
occasionally at Bijou.
43. Contopua borealia Olivb-sidbd Flycatchbr. — This flycatcher
is not abundant in Lake Valley ; I noticed it occasionally at Rowlands,
but more often on the mountain sides among the heavy timber.
44. Contopua richardaoni. Western Wood Pbwbb. — A very com-
mon bird throughout the region. I found a freshly built nest on June 7,
1901, near Lake Tahoe at 30 feet up in a dead tree near a small stream;
another at Bijou, on June 20, 1901, placed on a branch of a small tamarack,
15 feet up, with three fresh eggs. On June 18, 1903, near Bijou, a nest
was found saddled on a tamarack branch, 12 feet up, and also contained
three fresh eggs ; and another nearby was situated in a tamarack 40 feet
up with the same complement. The last two nests, now before me, are
^nw*] ^^^' ^•^ ^''^ i>//^*# Valiey, Cml 1 85
similar in construction and material, being externally composed of
gratset. weed fibres, bits of bark and string, and lined with horse-hair and
▼ariout bird feathers. In one the brilliant yellow feathers of the Western
Tanager are conspicuous. This nest measures 4 inches across, the cavity
being 3 by 1} inches deep. The most interesting nest of this bird I ever
saw was at Echo on June 15, 1902. It was on a small dead branch hang-
ing from the main trunk of a giant pine, fully 75 feet up. The nest
and bird were so small at this great height that they could be scarcely
teen, and my friend Olof Heinemann, who was with me, gazed for a
number of minutes before he could perceive it. The female was observed
whirling round and round in the almost completed nest and presently flew
off and returned with a bit of material which was carefully placed. Few
can realize the time and patience required to build these, one of the most
beautiful of all forest bird homes.
45. Bmpidonaz trailli Traill Flycatcher. — This bird is rather
scarce; a single nest was found July i, 1902, made of hemp fibres and
grasses and laced to an upright fork of a willow beside a small stream
near the Sierra House. It contained a single fresh egg, of the usual pale
buff blotched with reddish brown. This is the highest altitude at which
I have ever found this bird. At Buck's Ranch, Plumas County, elevation
5000 feet, I found a nest, which I collected with the parent, June 29, 1901,
in a willow, 3 feet up, near a small brook. It contained four eggs in which
incubation had just begun. The bird is evidently a late breeder, in fact,
in this region all the flycatchers breed late.
46. Bmpidonaz hammondL Hammond Flycatchrr. — Mr. Price
states he has observed young of this species frequeiTtly about Pyramid
Peak late in the summer.
47. Otocoria alpeatria merrilli. Dusky Horned Lark. — On October
6, 1901, Mr. Taylor collected a female at Meyer's Station, and another
near Lake of the Woods on October 9, at 8900 feet altitude.
48. Pica hudaonica. American Magpie. — Common about Rowlands
and in thickets along streams. I found numerous nests during the month
of June containing full-grown young, but in most cases the young had
already left. The nests were rough looking structures of sticks and all
placed in willows from 7 to 20 feet up.
49. Cyanocitta atelleri frontalia. Blue-fronted Jay. — Scarce on the
floor of the valley ^ut abundant on mountain sides. A nest found near
Fallen Leaf Lake, placed on the branch of a small fir in plain view, 8 feet
up, contained four large young on June 15, 1901. A late nest for this
species was noted near Phillip's Station in a tamarack 15 feet up, which
contained four small unfeathered young on July 3, 1902. When about
the nest the Jays are very quiet and drop their usual noisy ways.
5a Nucifrmga columbiana. Clarke Nutcracker. — This bird is not
common in the valley, although the day we arrived, June 16, 1902, 1 saw
a large band of Nutcrackers near Rowlands, and noticed others occasion-
ally in the pine woods during my stay. They are abundant at high
altitudes, as SUr Lake and Pyramid Peak.
1 86 Ray, lAind Birds of Lake Valley, Cal. [jf^
51. Xanthocephalua xanthocephalua. Yellow-hkadsd Blackbird.
— Thousands of these birds nest everv year at Rowland^s marsh, in the
thick tules over, usually, a considerable depth of water (4 to 10 feet).
Freshly built nests, eggs in all stages of incubation, and fully fledged
young were found during the month of June. Sets contained from two
to five eggs. The nests were compactly made and well fastened to the
tules, but when the young become grown the nest is frequently tipped to
one side, precipitating the juveniles into the water. In one nest, in a
rather sparse tule patch, the young birds were just on the verge of falling
out, and on our approach one of them tumbled into the water. We
replaced the young one in the nest, when another repeated the act, and
another, until we finally gave up attempting to put them back. We
paddled a short distance away and watched the nest; soon the occupants,
probably none the worse for their immersion, decided to set forth again.
All of them succeeded in keeping afloat until they clambered up in the
tules with an agility which surprised me when the helplessness of most
young birds is considered.
52. Agelaius phceniceus neutralit. * San Diego Red-wingbd
Blackbird. — This species outnumbers all other birds in the marsh and
it is strange it should have been overlooked by previous workers (it not
being recorded in Mr. Barlow's list). I shot seven red-winged black-
birds at random and nil proved to be this species, as were all the red-
wings I observed. On every trip to the marsh I found numberless nestt,
placed usually in small willows just above the water or attached to marsh
grass. All sorts and conditions of eggs and young were found during
June. On account of the unusually heavy snowfall in 1901, the lake rose
rapidly in June, flooding hundreds of nests of this bird. Many were
deserted, some containing eggs and others drowned young.
53. Agelaius gubemator califomicus. Bicolored Blackbird. — Mr.
Beck observed this bird nesting in the marsh near Bijou (presumably
Rowlands) in June, 1896.
5^. Agelaius tricolor. Tricolored Blackbird. — Observed nesting
on the shores of Lake Tahoe by Mr. Beck who collected a set of five eggs
on June 12, 1896. Personally I have never seen either this or the pre-
ceding species and do not think they can be considered by any means
common.
55. Sturnella mag^a neglecta. Western Meadowlark. — Not un-
common in the broad meadows about Lakeside, Bijou, and Rowlands.
They were rather shy, and I did not secure a specimen. To me the song
seemed somewhat different from that heard in our coast vallevs but a bird
■r
shot at Meyer's Station on Sept. 30, 1901, by Mr. Taylor, is recorded as
this species, so I am, no doubt, mistaken.
56. Scolecophagus cyanocephalus. Brewer Blackbird. — Common
about Rowland's marsh and various meadows throughout the valley. I
found nests in a variety of situations ; some were placed in a depression
in the damp ground in meadows, some in willows a foot or lest above the
^°iv?^] ^^^' ^""^ ^'''^* of Lak9 ValUy, Cat. 1 87
water, like those of the Red-wing, and others a f^w feet up in tamarack
saplings. All these situations are quite at variance with those selected
on the coast, which is generally in a pine or evergreen about 20 feet up.
I noticed in June, 1901, large numbers of these birds nesting in the sage-
brush near Carson, Nevada, owing to the absence of trees ; but the most
unusual nests were a number found in cavities of old piles over the water
at Bijou and Rowlands. One of these, at the latter place, was above 20
feet of water and 50 jards from the shore. It held five large young on
June 29, 1902, but could not be photographed successfully owing to the
lack of contrast, the birds, nest and pile all being dark requiring a time
exposure impossible in a canoe. As with the other blackbirds, the
breeding season extends through June, although the majority of nests
had young by June 15.
57. Coccothraustea vespertinus montanus. Western Evening
Grosbeak. — Observed by Mr. Barlow at Echo, just west of the summit,
on June 14, 1901.
58. Pinicola califomica. California Pine Grosbeak. — Mr. Barlow
saw this bird at Forni*s, at the base of Pyramid Peak, on June 9, 1900.
59. Carpodacus purpureus califomicus. California Purple Finch.
— Collected at Glen Alpine on June 24, 1900, by Mr. Price, who states it
it rare on the east slope of the range.
60. Carpodacus cassini. Cassin Purple Finch. — This purple finch
is found, though not abundantly, in Lake Valley. It was common about
Wright's Lake and Forni's in the Pyramid Peak region in July, 1902. At
Bijou, June 10, 1901, I located a nest in a massive pine over 100 feet up and
so far out on the branch as to be inaccessible. A few davs later I located
a nest near Lakeside in a similar situation.
61. Carpodacus mezicanus frontalis. House Finch. — Extremely
common, especially about Bijou. I am inclined to think the abundance
of this bird has been attributed by error to Carpodacus cassini. I found
numerous nests in small pines and tamaracks, from six to fifteen feet up,
and placed in the usual careless manner with little or no attempt at con-
cealment. Here the birds are late breeders, nest building commencing in
the latter part of June, and in most cases no eggs were deposited until
July I or later. Most sets consisted of three eggs, of the usual white
ground color with a faint tinge of bluish, lightly spotted.
62. Loxia curvirostra bendirei. Sierra Crossbill. — Rare. Mr.
Taylor collected a female near Meyer's Station Sept. 1, 190 1, and it has
been seen on two occasions by Mr. Price, once near Pyramid Peak, and
at Glen Alpine.
63. Leucosticte tephrocotis. Gray-crowned Leucosticte. —
Observed by various writers on the summit of Pyramid Peak. On our
visit, July 5, 1902, numerous leucostictes were seen flying about the boul-
ders and on the broad patches of snow. I patiently watched a number
for about half an hour with a field glass but failed to notice any indication
of a nest in the vicinity. In the meantime my brother and Heinemann
1 88 Ray, Land Birds of Lake Vaiiey, Cai. [^^
had already started back for camp and, desiring to make a short cut, went
down the slope where it is verj precipitous. Here, after some distance,
it became difficult to advance or retreat. A little distance awaj a pair of
leucostictes was observed in a rockj ledge. The pair was watched, and
soon one flew into a long, winding, impenetrable cavitjr among the huge
granite slabs of the ledge. On their approaching the spot the bird flew
out and began hopping about showing some anxiety. There is little
doubt that the birds had a nest there but it was impossible to reach it.
e>4. Aatragalinus paaltria. Arkansas Goldfinch. — A straggler was
shot by Mr. Price on the summit of Mount Tallac, August, 1892.
65. Spinua pinua. Pink Siskin. — Observed commonly by Mr. Price
at the head of Glen Alpine gorge where he has taken young in July and
August.
66. Zonotrichia leucophrjrs.* Whitkk:rownkd Sparrow. — This
sparrow is found sparingly about Bi]ou and Lakeside in Lake Valley, but
is abundant on the summit and about Pyramid Peak. It is a pleasing song-
ster, the song being similar to that of Z. /. nuttalU^ but the ending is
more abrupt. I have heard the male singing as late as nine o'clock at
night and at the first signs of daybreak. On June 10, 1901, scarcely fifty
yards from camp, my brother stumbled on a nest well concealed among
the grass at the foot of a small willow. We had passed this spot a num-
ber of times but the parent had been so alert as to steal off unnoticed.
The ^%%^^ four in number, were fresh and measured .87 X .62, .86 X .62,
.83 X .62, .72 X •59' They are greenish white with numerous small spots
of reddish brown. The nest is^of weed stems and grasses, lined with
horse*hair. It measures 4^ inches, over all, while the cavity is z\ bv 2
inches deep. I took the parents with this nest and the male, with n
broken wing led me a merry race over the meadow, as I had used the la«»t
shell in my auxiliary barrel.
67. Zonotrichia leucophrya gambeli. Intermediate Sparrow. —
Mr. Taylor secured three specimens about Glen Alpine and one at Mevcr*s
Station during the latter half of September, 1901, while in its migration
from the north.
68. Spizella socialis arizonae.* Western Chipping Sparrow. — Very
common throughout the valley, nesting in pine and tamarack saplings,
usually five or six feet up. The nests are all very similar — of gras^»
and vegetable fibres lined with horse or cow-hair, or both. They are
placed insecurely, owing to the character of the trees, near the end of the
branch. In Yosemite Valley, in the summer of 1898, 1 found most nests
placed in willows where they had a better foundation. The reason why
the birds do not select the willow as a nesting site here is probably
because they are not fully leaved when the breeding season commencres.
Some nesting dates are as follows : June 10, 1901, Bijou, four eggs, fresh;
June II, 1901, Bijou, four, incubation just begun; June ii, 1901, Bijou,
four small young ; June 17, 1902, Bijou, four eggs, incubation Just begun ;
July 2, 1902, Bijou, four fresh eggs.
^fiosT ^^^' ^^^ ^''^ of I^k€ Valley, Cal, 1 89
69. Spisella breweri. Brewer Sparrow. — Several were shot near
Meyer^s Station in July, 1896, bj Mr. Wilfred Osgood. I saw what I took
to be this bird on the brush covered rocky slopes on the east side of the
valley, but did not notice it about Bijou.
70. Junco hyemalis thurberi.* Sierra Jukco. — A common summer
resident; frequents the fertile meadows and localities adjacent to streams
more than the dry, sparsely wooded sections of the valley. My first nest
was found on June 7, 1901, containing four eggs that were just blowable.
This nest was completely hidden by the wide drooping leaves of a wild
sunflower, and was situated on the bank of an irrigating ditch, two miles
over the State line in Nevada. My prettiest set of eggs was taken a long
distance west of the summit, One mile west of Maple Grove, near River-
ton, on June 13, 1902. While driving along the road we flushed a junco
from a dripping mossy bank just above the road. The nest was very
damp, and well lined with coon hair. The eggs, three in number, were
fresh, and heavily marked in a wreath around the larger end with great
blotches of rich chestnut red and lavender. Near Phillip^s Station, on
June 16, 1902, a nest was discovered on the ground, flush with the surface,
with four eggs of the lightly marked type, in which incubation had just
begun. A curious nest was noted at Bijou in an empty tin can. It had
held two eggs, but these had rolled out on the ground and the birds had
deserted it. At an altitude of about 9000 feet, while climbing Pyramid
Peak, on July 5, 1902, 1 collected a nest with three partly incubated eggs
placed under the projecting ledge of a great boulder. Another was found
with four eggs, in which incubation had also just begun. It was located
in a similar situation and appears in the photograph by my brother who
found it. All the above nests are similar in construction, being made
of grasses and weed stems and some are lined with horse or other hair.
71. Melospiza cinerea montana. Mountain Song Sparrow. — A
rather common bird about Rowlands and also seen occasional! v in thickets
along streams, where a nest was found on the ground June 20, 1902, con-
taining five badly incubated eggs. It was so securely hidden by a tall
broad-leaved plant that I would have passed it by unnoticed had not the
parent fluttered off at my feet. On June 22, 1902, I found a nest at Row-
land's Marsh in a willow, over deep water, containing four small young.
72. Melospiza lincolni. Lincoln Sparrow. — On June 7, 1902, Mr.
Forrest Hanford secured a specimen on a meadow at 7,200 feet elevation,
where it was probably about to breed.
73. Passerella iliaca unnalaschensis. Townsexd Sparrow. — Mr.
Price records six sparrows of this form taken on Silver Creek, within
three miles of Pyramid Peak, in September, 1896. One specimen was
very light colored and referable to the Fox Sparrow rather than to P. i.
unalasckeusis,
74. Passerella iliaca megarhyncha. Thick-billed Sparrow. —
Rather abundant on the bushy, rocky hillsides in the eastern part of Lake
Valley, where it delivers its sweet song from some patch of brush or jagged
rock. I was unable to locate any nests.
190 Ray, Land Birds of Lake Valley, CaL [jj*
75. Oreospiza chlorura. Grbbn-tailed Towhbb. — Mr. Taylor
secured two specimens in September at Glen Alpine Springs.
76. Zamelodia melanocephala. Black-headed Grosbeak. — I
noticed it on a ridge east of Fallen Leaf Lake where a male was pouring
forth his clear, joyous notes from the top of a fir.
77. Cyanospiza amcena. Lazuli Bunting. — A single specimen was
shot in September, 1896, on Silver Creek, at about 7000 feet, bv Mr. Price,
who states it is rare above 4500 feet.
78. Piranga ludoviciana. Western Tanager. — The most brilliantly
colored bird in the region. While it is fairlv abundant in Lake Vallev,
it is more common in the heavy timber on the mountain sides. A nest
was found June 11, 1901, on the Bijou camp grounds in a tamarack only
15 feet up (misprinted 25, Osprey, Vol. V, No. 8), containing five fresh
eggs. Another, at Fyi^e, 38 miles west of the summit, was 50 feet up in
a pine, and held four partly incubated eggs. The average height, how-
ever, is about 30 feet. The nests are frail grosbeak-like structures of
rootlets. ^
79. Petrochelidon lunifrona. Cliff Swallow. — Common; forty
nests were found under the eaves of an old saloon built over the water at
Rowlands. Eggs and young in all stages during June.
80. Hirundo erythrogaster palmeri. Western Barn Swallow. —
Common, nests in barns and other outbuildings about Bijou and Row-
lands. A rather strange nest was found at the latter place on June 19.
1902, containing four fresh eggs. It was plastered against a rafter in a
small cottage, the bird gaining entrance through a small jagged hole in a
windowp.niie.
81. Tachycineta bicolor. • Tree Swallow. — Abundant aloni; the
lake shore, especially about Rowlands, where it nesls in dead trees »fid
stumps about the marsh. A nest found at this place on June 12. 1901.
was placed in a hole of a pile of an old wharf, over the water, and held
six eggs in which incubation had just Ix'gun. The nest wan profusely
lined with tVatliers. On June 22, 1902, a nest was found in the name hole
with five well incubated eggs and two others nearby held large young.
82. Tachycineta thalassina. Violet-green Swallow. — Seen in
August on the lakes in (jlen Alpine nearly every year by Mr. Price.
83. Vireo gilvus swainsoni. Western Warbling Vire«). — Ob-
served by Mr. Barlow on the Forni meadow near Pyramid Peak, altitude
7500 feet, in June, 1900.
84. Vireo solitarius cassini. Cassin Vireo. — ,Mr. Price notes it as
rare in Glen Alpine except during the early migration of the young when
they are very common.
85. Helminthophila rubricapilla gutturalit. Calaveras Warblbr.^
Mr. Price states it is rather common at Glen Alpine and on the slopes of
Mt. Tallac to at least 8000 feet.
86. Helminthophila celata lutescens. Lutbscbnt Warblkr. —
Observed by Mr. Price to be rather common in Glen Alpine in July and
August, although he states he has no evidence that it breeds.
^^w "^l ^^^' ^^^^ ^*'^^' of Lak€ ValUy, Cal. 191
87. Dendroica aestiva morcomi. Western Yellow Warbler. —
This I noted as the commonest warbler in Lake Vallej. All nests I
found were in pines or tamaracks, and placed rather insecurely when on
the end of the branch, owing to the character of the tree, but when found
in saplings the nest was placed against the trunk. One in a tamarack,
12 feet up, near Bijou, contained three well incubated eggs on June 25,
1902, and another, found on the same day, near by, held four small young,
and was placed S feet up in a pine.
8S. Dendroica coronata hooveri. Alaska Myrtle Warbler. — I am
reluctant to make observations that may be questioned, but I am reason-
ably sure I saw a bird of this species near Lakeside on June 26, 1902. It
was a male and lit close to me on the dead limb of a pine. Unfortunately
I did not have a gun with me but having that * Audubonian ' fire-arm,
the field glass, I was enabled to examine the bird well. My notes, made
at the time, tally with the descriptions of this bird. It had some resem-
blance to Dendroica auduboni^ but the conspicuous white throat distin-
guished it in an instant.
89. Dendroica auduboni. Audubon Warbler. — This highly colored
warbler is, next to Dendroica astixm^ the most abundant species in the
valley, and in some districts is even more common. A nest found with
four almost fresh eggs on June 17, 1902, at Bijou, was placed 25 feet up
against the main trunk of a tamarack. Another at Emerald Bay, on the
lake shore, in a pine four feet up, held five eggs, four well incubated and
one perfectly fresh. This was on June 27, 1902. Both sets are heavily
and richly marked, as is usual with the eggs of this species. The nests
are similar, of hemp fibres, fine rootlets, bits of bark, and lined very pro-
fusely with feathers, and can be distinguished by their large size from
those of D. (estiva at a glance.
90. Dendroica townsendi. Townsend Warbler. — A male was shot
near Gilmore Lake, on the slope of Mt. Tallac, at 8500 feet, early in
August, 1900, by Mr. Chas. Merrill and is recorded by Mr. Price.
91. Dendroica occidentalis. Hermit Warbler. — Mr. Price notes it
as rather rare, except late in July and early in August, about Silver Creek
when the migration of the young takes place.
92. Geothlypis tolmieL Tolmie Warbler. — Mr. Price states it is
rather common up to 8000 feet, both in the Silver Creek region and on
Mt. TalUc. -^
93. Qeothlypis trichas occidentalis. — Western Yellow-throat. —
Mr. Price dbserved a yellow-throat in the marshes about Tallac referable
to this species, but secured no specimens.
94. Wilsonia pusilla pileolata. Pileolated Warbler. — This war-
bler is not uncommon in the willow thickets along streams and about
Rowlands. Mr. Price records it as common in Glen Alpine, where a nest,,
placed on the ground under a fallen aspen, at Lily Lake, was found in
July, 1898, with five eggs. Mr. Barlow also saw this bird on the summit
on June 14, 1901.
192 Ray. Land Birds of Lake Vmiiey, Cmi. [jjjf
95. Cinclus mezicanus. American Dippkr. — Rare in the vallejr
proper but not uncommon along the turbulent ttreams in the mountains
that surround it. On June 35, 1902, 1 noticed a pair of dippers and joung
along a small stream on the road to Star Lake.
96. Troglodjrtes aedon parkmani Parkmam Wren. — Mr. Price
observed this bird in Glen Alpine and shot a pair early in August, 1900,
on Mt. Tallac at 8000 feet.
97. Certhia familiaria aelotea. Sierra Creeper. — Rather scarce.
I noticed several pairs of these birds in groves of dead pines in marshy
tracts at Rowlands.
98. Sitta carolinensis aculeata. Slender-billed Nuthatch. — I saw
this bird frequently on the summit in the middle of June, 1903. Also
observed by Mr. C. Barlow and Mr. L. E. Taylor. Mr. Price also remarks
it is common above 6000 feet on both sides of the range, at Silver Creek
and about Glen Alpine.
99. Sitta canadensis. Red-breasted Nuthatch. — Mr. Price notes
it as common at Silver Creek during migrations and states it may breed
there.
100. Sitta pygmsea. Pygmy Nuthatch. — A family were noted on
Silver Creek, at 7000 feet, in August, 1896, and several were taken by
W. W. Price, who states it is possible they were migrating.
loi. Parus gambeli. Mountain Chickadee. — The sprightly little
chickadee is rather common about the valley and was observed up to
above Star Lake, at about 9000 feet altitude. A curious nest of this bird
was found on June 26, 1902, near Bijou, placed in a pine stub, the entrance
being from the top of the stub running down about a foot perpendicu-
larly. The parents were confiding little fellows, flitting back and forth
with food for the five young ones notwithstanding I stood only a few
feet away.
102. Reg^lus satrapa olivaceus. Wkstern Golden-crowned King-
i-KT. — Mr. Taylor collected a female at Glen Alpine, Sept. 19, 1901.
103. Regulus calendula. Ruby-crowned Kinglet. — Mr. Tavlor
took an adult female at Glen Alpine, Sept. 19, 1901. Mr. Price statfK it
breeds commonly in the forests of alpine hemlock on the slopes of Pyra-
mid Peak and at the head of Glen Alpine but that he has never succeeded
in finding a nest.
104. Myadestes townsendi. Townsknd Solitairk. — Mr. Taylor
collectetl four specimens at Glen Alpine Sprinj^.s in September, and one
at Meyer's Station, Oct. 7, 1901.
105. Hylocichla ustulata. Ri'sskt-hacked Thrush. — A ^inJJle
record. Mr. 11. R. Tavlor found a nest at Echu just west of the summit
(altitude 5700 feet), June 16, 190J. with four ejjgs, placed in a small dense
fir tree in a meadow.
106. Hylocichla aonalaschkae sequoiensis. Sikrra Hermit Thrush.
— I have never noticed this bird on the fioor of the valley but as soon as
the ascent of the mountain nides is commenced the song is heard. The
y
^ wf*] BowDiSH, Food Habits of Wtst Indian Birds. 1 93
bird 18 nowhere 80 abundant as about Phillip^s Station, on the summit.
Here this peerless singer was heard occasionally through the dajr but
more often at dusk. I found a nest, built principally of rootlets, placed
in a small tamarack 6 feet up, along the road east of Phillip's Station on
July 3, 1902. It contained three rather pale blue eggs in which incuba-
tion had just begun. I discovered two other nests the same day, one
along the road, 6 feet up in a tamarack, with four small young; the
other was found deep in the woods, artfully placed among the branches
of a dead tamarack, and held four large young. In the last two cases
the parents were reluctant to leave the nest, and' hopped about the
branches near by, showing great anxiety and settled down on the nest
immediately after we left.
107. Merula migratoria propinqua. Western Robin. — As usual in
the Sierras the robin was the most common bird of its size, in Lake
Valley as well as up to 8000 feet altitude. It begins to lay in the Lake
Valley about the first of June, and a little later or earlier at other points,
according to the altitude.
108. Heaperocichla nsevia. Varied Thrush. — Mr. Price collected a
specimen on Silver Creek, Oct. i, 1896.
1091 Sialia arctica. • Mountain Bluebird. — Very common in Lake
Valley. I found nine nests one day on a ramble near Bijou, all placed in
dead trees or stumps, from 3 to 15 feet up. After the first week in June
nests contained partly incubated eggs, although an occasional late nest
was found. The Western Robin, Western Chipping Sparrow and the
Mountain Bluebird are the three commonest birds in the pine woods,
and although the latter is last on this list it is by no means the least
interesting bird in the region.
FOOD HABITS OF SOME WEST INDIAN BIRDS.
BY B. S. BOWDISH.
So FAR as I have noticed, few writers have given much attention
to the extent to which many birds of families which in the States
are considered more or less strictly insectivorous, feed in the West
Indies largely on fruit and seeds.
In *The Auk' for October, 1902, Mr. John Grant Wells men-
tions Vireo calidris as feeding more or less on small red berries,
and occasional mention of other cases may be found.
In Porto Rico the woodpecker, Melanerpes portoricensis^ forms
194 BowDiSH, Food Habits of West Indian Birds, \ j^^
about half its bill of fare of fruit and seeds. The Gray Kingbird,
Tyrannus dominicemis^ sometimes gleans more than half of its
living from vegetable substances ; Pitangus taylori feeds about as
largely on fruit, etc. ; Myiarchus antillarum and Blcuicus blamoi
also feed quite largely on such matter. These species constitute
the list of native flycatchers.
In Cuba three Woodpeckers — Xiphidioptcus percussus^ Melan-
erpes super ciiiaris^ and Colaptes chrysocaulosus — according to the
stomachs that I have examined, subsist on a diet not more than
one third of which is insectivorous.
Two native Vireos of Porto Rico, V, calidris and V, iatimeri,
feed to some extent on vegetable matter, and at times half or
more of the food of the former is vegetable.
Finally, Warblers coming to Cuba and Porto Rico from the
States for the winter were found to eat more or less weed-'seed
and in some cases to feed very largely on it.
In these islands, teeming with insect life, it seems a little
remarkable, even considering the temptation afforded by abun-
dance of fruit, that birds habitually considered insectivorous
should feed on vegetable matter to the extent of almost completely
changing their normal food habits, and I have no explanation to
account for it.
Following is the result of examinations of a few stomachs :
Melanerpes portoricensis. $ and $, July 2, seeds and buds with a
small percentage of insect matter; ?, Dec. 13, seeds and remains of
worms; ?, Dec. 28, seeds ; ?, April 8, insects; 9* ^^prtl 22, seeds and
remains of spiders ; ? , two seeds and small insects ; <y, Aug. 3, insects:
4 specimens (3 ? and i ?), Mav 26, one beetles, others seeds and remains
of fruit; ?, May 30, beetles and other insects ; 9. June 27. dragonfly; ^,
Sept. 6, insects and seeds.
T3rrannu8 dominicensis. i and $ , July 2, small shells and coleoptera;
? , Oct. 4, insects, chiefly coleoptera ; J, Jan. 18, a few small berries from
trees; 9, Jan. 20, one large berry-seed and remains of insects; J.Jan.
24, berries and insects; $ and 9» J*'*"- 26, seeds and insects; ?, Jan. 27,
seeds and insects ; (f , Jan. 28, insects and seeds ; J, Jan. 29, insects.
Myiarchus antillarum. 9<J"ly ^^1 seeds and coleoptera ; $,Jan. 18,
wasps ; sex ^ July i, beetles and seeds of small fruit , <y, July 11, worm ;
J, March i, fruit and lx*etles ; (f , June 26, seeds of small fruit and one
beetle; J, July 18, seeds of berries ; ?, a few seeds and large quantity of
coleoptera; 9t Sept. 5, seeds ot a small yellow fruit and one beetle; $,
^°W^] BowDiSH, Food Habits of Wtst Indian Birds. 1 95
Sept. 19, five seeds and a beetle ; $ , Oct. 5, large white grub and other
insects; 9* Oct. 15, several seeds of small fruit and wasps ; $, Oct. 19,
two thirds berries and one third inEects.
Blacicus blancoi. <y, Feb. 3, beetles ; J, Feb. 10, beetles ; ? , May 30,
flies ; ^, June 2, beetles ; ?, June 25, beetles ; ? , July 15, beetles ; ? , July
18, insects and remains of berries; J, seeds of berries; J, July 21,
beetles; J , July 27, beetles ; <?, July 31, beetles ; J, Aug. 3, insects ; ?,
Aug. 25, flies and millers; 2 J and i 9, Aug. 30, beetles; 2 J, Sept. 2,
insects; J, Sept. 3, beetles; J, Sept. 14, beetles; ?, Sept. 15, beetles ;
$ and ?, Sept. 22, beetles ; (f , Sept. 23, beetles ; ^, Oct. 16, beetles.
Vireo calidris. J, July 2, insects; J, May 27, insects; ?, July i,
almost entirely seeds of small fruit ; ? juv., May 30, legs of beetle; <y,
May 30, insects and seeds of a small red fruit; J 1 July 14, insects; $y
July 17, small fruit remains ; ?, Sept. 28, insects.
Vireo latimeri. J, ? and juv. $y Apr. i, insects and in juv. small
centipede; (f, Apr. 22, insects; $ juv. July 17, grasshopper and small
red berries and seeds; $ and $, July 26, insects and small fruit seeds;
<J, Aug. I, chiefly seeds ; J juv., Sept. 5, worm and insects; $ juv.,
Sept. 14, insects; $^ Sept. 17, large tree seed and several beetles; Sy
Sept. 18, cricket and five tree seeds; <y,Sept. 23, flies and worm ; (f,
Sept. 25, small worms; (J^, Sept. 26, small hairy caterpillars; $ and $,
Sept. 27, beetles and one seed ; 9 ' Oct. 9, 10 small black seeds and trace
of insects; $ ^ Oct. 10, yellow berries and legs of insects.
I also found seeds in the stomachs of the Black and White,
Parula, Myrtle, Palm, and Prairie Warblers, particularly the Myrtle
and Palm, the latter feeding almost exclusively on seeds of weeds,
near Santiago and Guam a, Cuba.
This would appear largely to eliminate the question of food
supply from the problem of causes of bird migration.
196 Obsrholsbr, Review of tkt G^mms Cmtkerfgs. [aoin
A REVIEW OF THE GENUS GATHER PES.
BY HARRY C. OBERHOLSER.
Identification of the Texas Cailon Wrens has involved a
canvass of the entire group, the results of which investigation are
presented herewith.
The genus Catherpes Baird * is a very well-defined one, of which
there seem to be five recognizable forms, all, without doubt, sub-
species of Catherpes mexicanus,
Catherpes mexicanus mexicanus (Swainson).
Thryothorus mexicanus Swainsom, Zool. Illustr. Ser. 2, I, 1829, pi. xi.
Troglodytes murarius Lichtenstein, Preis-Vcrz. Mcx. Vogel, 1830,
No. 80.
Thriothorus guttulatus Lafrssnays, Rev. Zool. 1839, p. 99.
Chars, subsp. — Largest and darkest, the depth of color especiallj
noticeable on the upper surface.
Type locality, — Real del Monte, Hidalgo, Mexico.
Geographical distribution. — Tableland of Mexico, excepting the north-
ern portion.
This essentially Mexican race occurs nowhere in the United
States, all records to such effect belonging under the other forms.
Catherpes mexicanus albifrons {Giraud).
Certhia albifrons Giraud, Descr. Sixteen Species North Am. Birds,
1841, p. 31.
Chars, subsp. — Similar to Catherpes mexicanus mexicanuSt but rather
smaller, except the bill; and decidedly paler above, the head more grayish.
Type locality. — "Texas" [probably northeastern Mexico].
Geographical distribution. — States of Nuevo Leon, Coahuila, and prob-
ably Tamaulipas, Mexico; north to Texas at the mouth of the Pecos River.
1 Pac. R. R. Rep., IX, 1858, p. 356 (type Thryothorus mexicanus Swain-
SON).
V«LXX
S9PS
1 Obbrholsbr, Rtview of tkt Gtnus Cmtktrpts. igj
The specimen upon which Giraud based his description of Cer-
thia aibifrons^ although a dark, immature bird, with a small bill,
agrees best with the form that enters the United States only along
the lower Rio Grande, — a conclusion already announced by Mr.
Nelson ; ^ but that this type, now in the United States National
Museum, came originally from within the present boundaries of
Texas, as claimed, may well be doubted, particularly if the results
of investigation regarding others of Giraud's reputed "Texas"
birds be admitted as negative evidence.
Catherpes mexicanus polioptilus, subsp. nov.
Ckars, subsp, — Like Catktrpes mexicanus albifrons^ but paler above
and with a much shorter bill.
Type locality. — Deer Mountain, Chisos Mountains, Texas.
Geographical distribution. — From western Texas, through New Mex-
ico, Arizona, and northwestern Mexico to Lower California.
Description. — Type, male adult. No. 168350, U. S. Nat. Mus., Biological
Survey Collection; Deer Mountain (opposite Mount Emory to the east),
Chisos Mountains, Texas, 6500 feet; H. C. Oberholser. Upper surface
grajish brown, becoming rufescent posteriorly, and spotted with darker
brown and buffy; rump and upper tail-coverts chestnut ; wings fuscous
irregularly barred and margined externally with light chestnut; tail pale
chestnut, with narrow black bars; ill-defined superciliary stripe dull
whitish; cheeks, lower part of auriculars, throat, and jugulum white;
abdomen chestnut, sparingly dotted with darker brown.
Specimens from New Mexico, Arizona, and Lower California
are, as a rule, somewhat darker than those from Texas, and though
evidently verging more or less toward punctulatus^ apparently
belong here.
Variation, both seasonal and individual, is great in both poliop-
tilus and conspersus. Young birds of these races seem to be
darker than adults.
Catherpes mexicanus punctulatus Ridgway,
Catherpes mexicanus punctulatus Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. V,
1882, p. 343.
» Auk, XV, 1898, p. 160.
198
Oberholser, Synopsis of ike G^nus Psaltriparus.
[Aak
Apr
Chars, subsp. — Similar to Catherpes mexicanus polioptilus^ but decid-
edly darker above, and of smaller size.
Type locality.— Forest Hill, Placer County, California.
Geographical distribution. — California (excepting the southeastern
part), Oregon, and southern Washington (Almota).
Catherpes mexicanus conspersus Ridgway.
Catherpes mexicanus var. conspersus Ridgway, Amer. Nat. VII, Oct.
1873, p. 602.
Chars, subsp. — Resembling Catherpes mexicanus polioptilus^ but
smaller (except the bill); paler and more rufescent above, particularly
on the head.
Type locality. — Fort Churchill (southeast of Wadsworth), Nevada.
Geographical distribution. — Wyoming and Colorado, west to Nevada
and southeastern California.
Average millimeter measurements of males of the five forms of Cath-
erpes are as follows :
OE
6
\
5
2
5
5
5
Catherpes mexicanus
Catherpes mexicanus
Catherpes mexicanus
Catherpes mexicanus
Catherpes mexicanus
mexicanus
albifrons
polioptilus
punctulatus
conspersus
Wing
Tail
ExpoMd
culmen
Tamu
65.8
56.2
22.2
"9-7 .
62.8
538
24.3 18.5 !
634
54.6
20.7 19. 1
59-9
50-4
19.I 18.3
59.6
52.1
20.4
«7.S
Middle
Toe
I5.I
143
>3-7
13.6
>3-2
A SYNOPSIS OF THE GENUS PSALTRIPARUS.
BY HARRY C. OBERHOI^ER.
The genus Psaltriparus^ though by Dr. Gadow not considered
separable from Acredula^ ^ is, nevertheless, an easily recognizable
group. As commonly accepted it comprises the few small species
of Paridae treated below.
1 Cat. Birds Brit. Mus., VIII, 1883. p. 54.
Vol. XXI
1903 J Oberholser, Synopsis of the Genus Psaltriparus. I GO
Psaltriparus Bonaparte,
Psaltriparus Bonaparte, Compt. Rend. XXXI, 1850, p. 478.
Psalirites Cabanis, Journ. f. Orn. 1881, ■ p. 333 (norn. emend, pro
Psaltriparus^.
Tvpe. — Psaltriparus personatus Bonaparte ; ^ Parus melanotis Hart-
laub.
Range. — Guatemala, Mexico, and the western United States.
Psaltriparus melanotis melanotis {HartlauV),
Parus melanotis Hartlaub, Rev. Zool. 1844, p. 216.
Psaltriparus personatus Bon AT ARTRt Compt. Rend. XXXI, 1850, p. 478.
Psaltrites kelviventris Cabanis, Journ. f. Orn. 1881, p. 333, pi. iv, fig. i.
Type locality. — Mexico (southern part).
Geographical distribution. — Guatemala, and southern Mexico north
at least to Hidalgo and Michoacan.
The black sides of the head and the rich brown color of the
bllck serve readily to distinguish this form from all others of the
genus. The bird described by Cabanis as Psaltrites kelviventris^ ^
from Western Mexico, interrogatively Tehuantepec, though some-
times synonymized with Psaltriparus plumbeus^ is undoubtedly the
female of P. melanotis,
Psaltriparus melanotis iulus Jouy.
Psaltriparus melanotis iulus Jouy, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. XVI, 1894,
p. 776.
Type locality, — Hacienda El Molino, Jalisco, Mexico.
Geographical distribution. — Jalisco, with probably north central
Mexico.
Similar to P, melanotis^ but the back paler, as are also the
lower parts.
Psaltriparus melanotis Uoydi (Sennett),
m
Psaltriparus Uoydi Sennktt, Auk, V, Jan. 1888, p. 43.
Psaltriparus santarita Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. X, September,
1888, p. 697.
* Loc. cit.
200 Obbrholsbr, Synapsis of ike Gemms Psmliripmrus. \!^.
Tyft locality, — Limpia Cafion, near Port Davis, Texas.
Gtograpkical distribution, — Southwestern Texas, southern New
Mexico, southern Arizona, and northern Mexico.
Resembles P, m, iulus^ but the back is almost clear plumbeous
instead of light brown. Specimens from northern Mexico (Chihua-
hua) show intergradation with iulus^ so that P, lloydi must be con-
sidered a subspecies of P. melanotis.
Adult males of lloydi are of course distinguishable at a glance
from the very distinct Psaltriparus plumbeus, but females and
young require to be examined more closely. The adult female of
the former differs from both sexes oi plumbeus in having a distinct
blackish streak along each side of the head above the auriculars.
Young males present generally a greater contrast between the
color of the head and back than is seen in plumheus^ and, further-
more, nearly always have, even when very young, some black or
blackish brown on the sides of the head or neck, with often a
narrow black or blackish collar on the hind neck, — this, however,
frequently incomplete or partially obscured. Young females have
but very slight indication of blackish on the sides of the head,
sometimes none, in which latter condition they cannot with cer-
tainty be separated from plumbeus.
The type of Mr. Ridgway's Psaltriparus santarita is an imma-
ture male of lloydi^ as a careful examination shows, and it can be
easily matched by young male specimens from any part of the
range of the latter.
Psaltriparus plumbeus {Bairti),
Psaltria plutnbea Baird, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. June, 1854, p. 1 18.
Type locality. — Little Colorado River, Arizona.
(ico^rapbical distribution. — Western Texas to eastern California,
north to eastern Oregon and western Wvoniing.
Psaltriparus minimus minimus (Tawnsena).
Parus minimus Townsexd, Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. VII, pt. fi.
i8?7, p. 190.
Type locality. — Columhia River.
iieographical distribution. — Pacific coast region, from San Francisco
Bav, California, to Washington.
VoLXXl
1903
J OBmRHOi,smRt Symof sis of tAg Ggttus Psai/riparms, 20I
The darkest specimens come from the state of Washmgton.
Those from the northern coast of California, particularly near San
Francisco Bay, are intermediate between minimus and califomicus,
Psaltripanis minimus califomicus Ridgway,
Psaltriparns minimus califomicus Ridgway, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash.
n, 1884, p. 89.
Type locality, — Baird, Shasta County, California.
Geographical distribution. — California, excepting the northern coast
region ; northern Lower California.
Lighter colored than true P, minimus^ and apparently a good
form. We therefore can see no reason for the suppression of the
name califomicus^ which Mr. Grinnell has recently sought to
accomplish. ^
Psaltriparus grindae Ridgway.
Psaltriparus grinda^iUGyfKy, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. VI, 1883, p. 155
(Belding MS.).
Type locality. — Laguna, Lower California.
Geograpkico I distribution. — Southern part of Lower California.
This bird seems to be specifically distinct from Psaltriparus
minimus, as Mr. Brewster has recently stated. ^
The name, moreover, should be credited to Ridgway instead of
Belding, to conform to the present treatment of manuscript
names.'
* Pac. Coast Avifauna, No. 3, 1902, p. 72.
'Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, p. 205.
202 Snodgrass, Land Birds of Ctmtral Washington, \k^.
A LIST OF LAND BIRDS FROM CENTRAL
WASHINGTON.
BY ROBERT E. SNODGRASS.
During the summer of 1902 the Washington Agricuhural Col-
4ege equipped and maintained in the field for one month, a biolog-
ical collecting expedition. The material obtained includes princi-
pally mammals, birds, reptiles, fishes, insects and plants. The
birds are given in the appended list.
The region selected as the basis of exploration is the old dry
canon of the Columbia River in the northeast quarter of Douglas
County, known as the Grand Coulee. This is simply a great
gorge fifty miles long and from one to two miles wide, cut down
three hundred to five hundred feet into the enormous layers of
basalt that form the top of the country throughout central and
southeast Washington.
Although the Grand Coulee is now dry, with the exception of
scattered, mostly alkaline lakes, having neither outlets nor inlets, it
certainly at one time was nothing less than the channel of the
Columbia River. There is no doubt that the latter, during glacial
times, was so dammed up to the west that its original course
became entirely closed. Its waters then rolled back upon them-
selves and a great lake was formed between the mouths of the
Sans Foil and Okanogan Rivers. When this became too great for
its embankments, an outlet stream started off overland to the
southwest. This, however, soon cut for itself a channel in the soft
basalt rock, and before the glaciers released the dammed up
waters of the lake and let them once more follow their natural
course in a great bend to the west and south, this short-cut stream
had formed the Grand Coulee. It met the old river bed far to
the southwest, near the Saddle Mountains and just south of where
the Northern Facific Railroad now crosses the Columbia. Since
returning to its old course the river has cut its caiion down five
or six hundred feet below the floor of the Coulee. This has given
to the people living in this region the notion that, if water ever
did flow through the Grand Coulee, it must have gone north and
not south.
Vol. xxn
1903
J Snodgrass, Land Birds of Central Washington. ^^3
The Grand Coulee is, then, simply what was once a temporary
short-cut for the Columbia River around the eastern face of the
glaciers. Its walls, except in the neighborhood of Coulee City,
are vertical cliffs rising in places probably between four hundred
and five hundred feet. Their bases are everywhere hidden behind
high banks of talus. This talus is continually accumulating, and is
almost everywhere so new that it consists of angular fragmental
material. At Coulee City, only, the walls of the Coulee are low
and sloping. They are here worn down to such a gentle inclina-
tion that the, Central Washington Railway is graded nearly across
the caSon. At only four other places has it been possible to con-
struct a wagon road or even a trail out of the Coulee.
Of course the mere geological interest of the Grand Coulee can-
not make it of any biological importance. However, the fact that
its floor is only in a few places capable of cultivation, has caused
it to be left, by the advancing flood of wheat that has over-
whelmed much of the Big Bend country, almost intact and in its
original, native, undisturbed condition. It is a sunken biological
oasis in a desert of wheat flelds. Nothing can be more distressing
to a naturalist than to travel across the Big Bend country and for
a whole day to see not one square foot of Nature's original sage-
brush verdure ; to camp at night on a strip of land a few feet wide
between a dusty road and a barbed-wire fence ; and to * bum' wood
and water from a neighboring farm-house. Not even are there
willow- and weed-fringed streams in the depressions between the
hills. There is nothing left of Nature but the air and the dust of
th^road.
This desolateness, however, is occasionally relieved by coming
upon great stretches of most refreshing ' scab-land * country. Such
areas alternate with the wheat deserts in Lincoln County and
occupy also a large space along the eastern edge of the Grand
Coulee. On them there is scarcely any soil, only enough for sage-
brush to grow on. The surface is cut by erosion into irregular
hollows, low hills, abrupt walls, ridges and small tower-like buttes.
A weird and wild aspect has this country — Nature's reserve for
the naturalist. In the hollows are scattered about small densely
alkaline lakes whose waters have a beautiful greenish-black color
by transmitted light. The traveler on these strips is never
20A. Snodgrass, Laud Birds of C€miral Waskimgimt. [JkSi.
haunted by the distressing expectation of finding drinking water.
The wild and formidable nature of the country is somedmes tram-
pled on by bands of grazing cattle, but nowhere does it and never
wilbit submit to the hideous insult of being made to support a
wheat field or a farm-house. The Sage Sparrow, the Sage
Thrasher and the Homed Toad live in perfect tranquillity, for no
fear have they that their children's children or great-grandchildren
will here ever be subjected to the shame of living on else than
the sage-brush of their fathers.
To the student of geographical distribution the Big Bend fauna
must be of special interest, since the country represents the north-
ern limit of the sage-brush region in the Northwest. Immediately
to the north of the Columbia River arise the low but pine clad
Okanogan Mountains. On the west the sage-brush is limited by
the Cascades. On the east it is bounded to the north by the
region of small pines occupying Spokane County, and to the south
by the (naturally) bunch-grass covered hills of the Palouse coun-
try. Collecting in the Grand Coulee possesses a great attractive-
ness due to the intrinsic interest of the region it represents, and,
furthermore, it is enhanced through the variety given to the fauna
by numerous small reedy marshes scattered through the canon.
Numerous water birds breed in the Coulee, but we did not have
time to devote much attention to them. We have specimens of
the following species: Anas boschaSy Erismatura Jamauensis,
Fulica americana^ Tringa maculata, and yEgiaiitis vocifera.
Specimens of most of the species recorded in the following list
were secured. Some were merely seen, but such are so described*
and in most cases the identification could not be mistaken.
Where doubtful, the doubt is indicated. The paper by W. L.
Dawson on the Birds of Okanogan County, referred to several
times in the list, is that published in * The Auk' for April, 1897,
pages 168-182.
1. Pedioecetes phasianellus columbianus. Columbian Siiarp-tailbo
CiRoi'SK (known here in the Northwest a8 * Prairie Chicken '). — None of
the>e were met with in tlic Coulee region, but several individuaU ^-cre
seen at Crab Creek and a whole family at Sprague in the southeast part of
Lincoln County. They are or have been plentiful throughout the whole
southeastern part of the State.
2. Centrocercus urophasianus. Sage Hen. — These great birds are
^*J^^] Snodgrass, Land Birds of Ctntral Washington, 205
reported to be common throughout Douglas County. We obtained three
specimens — an adult female and two jroung — from a small band of them
southeast of Coulee City. None were seen in the Grand Coulee and we
were told by inhabitants that they never come down into the caiion.
3. Zenaidara macroura. Mourning Dovr.— Rather common through-
out the Big Bend country. Several nests were found on the ground in
the sage-brush.
4. Cathartes aura. Turkey Vulture. — A number seen flying about
in the Coulee. Observed as far north as the Columbia River.
5. Circus hudsonius. Marsh Hawk. — Several seen in the Coulee
flying above the small marshes.
6. Accipiter cooperi. Cooper's Hawk. — Rather common along the
high cliff walls of the Coulee, keeping generally above shot-gun reach.
7. Buteo borealis calurus. Western Red-tail. — Common every-
where.
8. Falco sparverius deserticolus. Desert Sparrow Hawk. — Com-
mon everywhere along the cliffs of the Coulee, nesting in holes high up
on the walls.
9. Asio wilsonianus. American Long-eared Owl. — Not seen in
the Coulee region. Common along Crab Creek in Lincoln County.
la Bubo virginianus pallescens. Western Horned Owl. — Only
two individuals of this owl were seen : one was in the wheat fields near
Wilbur in the northwest part of Lincoln County, the other was at Crab
Creek in the southwest part of the same county. Although neither was
secured there can be little doubt as to the variety since this is the resident
form about Pullman in Whitman County.
11. Speotyto cunicularia hypogsea. — Burrowing Owl. — This owl
is common throughout the centra! and southeastern part of the State.
12. Ceryle alcyon. Belted Kingfisher. — Several observed at Crab
Creek in Lincoln County. None met with in the Coulee.
13. Melanerpes torquatus. Lewis's Woodpecker. — One specimen
obtained in the pines that occur sparsely scattered about in the north end
of the Grand Coulee. The granite underlying the basalt is exposed as
rough hills on the floor of the Coulee for eight miles south from the head.
On this granite there grew a few evergreens, mostly small trees of Pinus
pond^rosa. ^
14. Colaptes cafer collaris. Red-shafted Flicker. — Several Flick-
ers were heard in the pines of the northern end of the Coulee and one or
two were seen, but no specimens were obtained. It is probable that they
were of the form named, for Dawson records it from Okanogan County
just north of here.
15. Phalsenoptilus nuttallii. Poor-will. — Abundant both in the
Coulee and over the region southeast of it. Found specially numerous
at Crab Creek in Lincoln County. According to Dawson, this bird in
Okanogan County "is confined to semi-arid regions in valleys and
'drmwi.''*
2o6 Snodgrass, Land Birds of Central Washingtom, Capt!
i6. Chordeiles virginianut henryL Western Nighthawk. — Verv
<:ommon throughout the Big Bend country.
17. Tyrannus tyrannus. Kingbird. — Common throughout the Bij^
Bend country, nesting abundantly. Taken the whole length of the
•Grand Coulee.
18. Tyrannus verticalis. Arkansas Kingbird. — This flycatcher wa*i
found everywhere that the last was observed except at the southern end
of the Coulee. We found it from a short distance north of here, however,
to the Columbia. It is common throughout Lincoln and Whitman
Counties.
19. Sayornis saya. Say's Piicebe. — Is not abundant but occurs
everywhere in the Big Bend country.
20. Empidonax difficilis. Western Yellow-bellied Flycatcher.
— This species was not observed anywhere in the Grand Coulee, nor in
the Big Bend country till we got south to Crab Creek in the toutheastcm
part of Lincoln County. Along Crab Creek there is a dense growth of
<trees, affording a resort for birds such as does not occur northwest or
west of it. Hence, we found that this was the northwest limit of many
birds common to the southeast in Whitman County. This flycatcher is
one of them.
21. Otocoris alpestris merrilli. Dusky Horned Lark. — Common
throughout the Big Bend region.
11. Pica pica hudsonica. American Magpie. — These birds occur
throughout the whole length of the Grand Coulee, but they are not very
<:ommon. They were not observed on the plains to the east and south-
east, but were again found at Rock Creek in Whitman County.
23. Corvus americanus. American Crow. — A few bands observed
at the head of the Coulee along the Columbia River. Found common
at Rock Creek below Rock Lake in the northwest part of Whitman
■County.
24. Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus. Yellow-headed Blackbird.
Coininon in two marshes in the Grand Coulee, one near the middle, the
other about eight miles from the head. Not seen elsewhere in the Big
Bend, but found at Rock Creek in Whitman County.
25. Agelaius phoeniceus. Rei>*wingkd Blackbird. — The writer
cannot be certain that the Red-winged Blackbird of the inland North-
west is A. pha'niccHs^ not having material at hand for comparison. Occurs
in all marshy places.
26. Sturnella magna neglecta. Wrstkrn Meadowlark. — Common
everywhere.
27. Icterus bullocki. Bullock's Oriole. — Occurs in favorable placet
in the Grand Coulee throughout its length, but was not found common
anywhere.
28. Scolecophag^s cyanocephalus. Brk\vkr*s Blackbird. — Com-
mon everywhere except in sage-brush remote from water.
29. Astragalinus tristis. American Goldfinch. — Goldfinches were
^®'^^] Snodgrass, Land Birds of Central Washington. 207
not common in the Big Bend country. A few were seen at Freshwater
Lake in the south half of the Coulee, and they were rather numerous
along the Columbia at the head of the Coulee.
30. Pocecetes gramineus confinis. Western Vesper Sparrow.
— This is probably the most common bird of the Big Bend region. It
inhabits alike the original undisturbed sage-brush covered tracts and the
most extensive wheat fields. Everywhere it flits up before one, and it is a
constant occupant of all barbed-wire fences.
31. Chondestes grammacus strigatus. Western Lark Sparrow. —
Common everywhere in the Coulee and also throughout the Big Bend
country.
32. Spixella brcwcri. Brewer's Sparrow. — This very little sparrow
iissociates everywhere with the much larger but similarly-colored Vesper
Sparrow. It is, however, not nearly so abundant as the latter. The
Columbia River is apparently almost the northern limit of its range in
Washington, for Dawson reports but one specimen from Okanogan
County.
33. Amphispiza belli nevadensis. Sage Sparrow. — We found this
species common on the sage-brush plain south of the Grand Coulee
between the towns of Adrian and Ephrata on the Great Northern Railway,
And also about Soap Lake (or Alkali Lake) in the southern end of the
Coulee. North of here we did not meet with it, either in the Coulee or
on the plains at either side, nor did we see it anywhere to the east or
southeast. Dawson does not report it from Okanogan County. We
probably collected the bird at the northern limit of its range. It has
ticver been taken in Whitman County, and nothing is known of its
range in the middle of the southern part of the State.
34. Melospixa melodia montana (?) Mountain Song Sparrow. —
'This is a rare bird in the Big Bend. A few individuals were seen and
heard near Freshwater Lake about two miles south of Coulee City. Only
one specimen was obtained here. No others were met with in the whole
country until we got to Crab Creek in the southeastern part of Lincoln
County. The bird is abundant all over Whitman County.
35. Pipilo maculatus var. ? One individual seen near the town of
Ephrata on the Great Northern Railway, just southwest of the mouth of
the Grand Coulee. No others met with.
36. Cyanospiza amoena. Lazuli Bunting. — A few individuals seen
at Freshwater Lake in the southern part of the Coulee, and a few at the
head along the Columbia. Only one specimen obtained.
37. Piranga ludoviciana. Louisiana Tanager. — This species was
found only on the bank of the Columbia at the head of the Grand Coulee.
38. Petrochelidon lunifrons. Cliff Swallow. — Common through-
out the entire length of the Coulee, nesting along the cliffs. This is also
the commonest swallow all over the Big Bend country.
39. Hirundo erythrogaater. Barn Swallow. — This swallow was
not met with in the Coulee. A few were seen about the towns of Wilbur
.and Harrington in Lincoln County.
2o8 Snodgrass, Lund Birds of Central Washington. \,hm.
4a Tachycineta thaUasina lepida. Northern Violbt-grbkn Swal-
low. — This species was common at various places in the Grand Coukef
but was not so universally abundant as the Clifif Swallow.
41. Lanius ludovicianus ezcubitorides. White-rumpbd Shrikk. —
Not common but found the whole length of the Coulee.
42. Dendroica sstiva. Yellow Warbler. — Found wherever favor-
able clumps of small trees or bushes occur.
43. Qeothlypis trichas occidentalis. Western Yellow-throat. —
Common in reedy marshes of the Grand Coulee. Taken also at Rock
Creek in the northwest part of Whitman County.
44. Icteria virens longicauda. Long-tailed Chat. — We found this
bird near the town of Ephrata southwest of the mouth of the Grand
Coulee, at various places in the Coulee as far north as the Columbia, at
Crab Creek in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, at Rock Creek
in northwestern Whitman County. It occurs also about Pullman and
along the Snake River in Whitman County.
45. Setophaga ruticilla. American Redstart. — One male specimen
taken in dense growth of trees along Crab Creek in southeastern part of
Lincoln County. A female seen here also, but otherwise the species was
not met with.
46. Oroscoptes montanua. Sage Thrasher. — This bird is seldom
seen and it confines itself to the undisturbed sage-brush areas. We saw
two individuals near the town of Ephrata on the Great Northern
Railway, another in the Grand Coulee somewhat north of the middle,
a fourth at Crab Creek in Lincoln County, and a fifth one in the wide
strip of 'scab-land' just south of Sprague in Lincoln Countj*. Two
specimens were obtained.
47. Qaleoscoptes carolinensis. Catbird. — This bird is common in
Whitman County, and we found it in the southeastern part of Lincoln
County at Crab Creek. Nowhere beyond here, however, /. *., to the north
or west, did we meet with it.
48. Salpinctes obsoletus. Rock Wren. — This wren is common
throughout the length of the Grand Coulee, but it almost confines
itself to the slopes of talus along the bases of the walls. It occurs
also in all of the ' srab-land ' country where there is a great deal of bare
rock forming low walls and projecting in rugged irregular masses. It
is never to be found on a level open country. Even in the Coulee it
seldom ventures far out onto the flat floor of the caflon, invariably asso-
ciating itself only with rocky places.
49. Cistothorus paliistris plesius. Westkrn Marsh Wren. — Rather
common in some of the marshes of the Grand Coulee. Although the
writer has no material at hand for other localities for comparison, there
is probablj' no doubt of the identification here given.
50. Parus atricapillus occidentalis. Oregon Chickadee. — Found
common along Crab Creek in Lincoln County, but not met with in the
Coulee country.
^^^T Gtfif^ra/ Notes, 209
51. Merula mig^toria propinqua. Western Robin. — Found
throughout the Coulee but nowhere very plentiful.
52. SialU arctica. Mountain Bluebird. — Two specimens obtained
in the Grand Coulee, both north of the middle. No others seen any.-
where in the Big Bend country.
GENERAL NOTES.
The Dovekie (Alle alle) on Long Island, N. Y. — January 15, 1903, Mr.
George W. Mott of Westminster Kennel Club brought in a Dovekie to
be mounted. I inquired where he procured it, and he informed me that
it had been given him by a boy who found it the morning previous,
lying in the road midway between the steamboat dock and Babylon
Village. It evidently had struck either the electric light or telephone
wires, as the neck and breast were much bruised. The bird was found
in a road crossing meadows near Great South Bay, and at least three
and one half miles from the ocean. Both plumage and body were in
good condition. — Henry Mott Burtis, Babylon, L, /.
A Hybrid Duck, Anas bosckas X Nettton caroliuensis. — Hybrids among
the Anatidae are well known to be of frequent occurrence and some of the
crosses are so common as to be scarcely worthy of record. A specimen
that has recently come into possession of the Academy of Natural Sciences
of Philadelphia, however, seems to be quite an unusual mixture, and
a hasty glance through the literature fails to discover a similar record,
although there are several instances of hybrids between Anas boschas and
the old world species Nettton crecca.
The bird in question was secured by my friend, Dr. Charles B. Penrose
of Philadelphia, on the upper part of Currituck Sound, N. C, on January
i7i '9^3* ^^ i^ ^ drake and combines in almost equal proportions the
characters of the Mallard and Green-winged Teal. The back is mainly
Teal with the plainer feathers of the Mallard showing on the median
line ; the wings are also those of the Teal but the speculum is bluer and
edged with black, while the fulvous bar is mixed with black and white.
Below the belly is dusky like the Mallard's, w^ith the same fine transverse
vermiculations, and while the breast is spotted with black like the TeaPs,
the ground color is rich chestnut, with a tendency to lighter edges to the
feathers as in the Mallard. The head is solid green like that of the Mal-
lard with a narrow white neck band, and with a rufous frosting on the
occiput covering part of the area so colored in the Teal. On the sides of
the breast are the characteristic diagonal white stripes of the Teal.
Size intermediate between the two.
2 1 0 Gtmeral Nott. [jjjj
The bird is strikingly beautiful and its flesh, in the opinion of an epi-
cure, was as fine as any duck he had ever eaten. — Wither Stonk, Acad^
€my of Natural Sciences^ Pkiladtiphiay Pa.
A Correction. — In ' The Auk' for 1903, p. 76, 1 noted a European Wid-
geon {Mareca Penelope) taken in North Carolina as probably the first to
be recorded from the State. I find a record, however, which I previously
overlooked, in the Bulletin of the Nuttall Club for 1879, p. 190, where
the capture of two males is recorded, one on Dec. 17, 1878, and one on
Jan. 17, 1879, by De L. Berier. — Reginald Hebbr Hows, Jr., Concord^
Mass,
Wood Ibis in Montana. — It will be of interest to the readers of 'The
Auk' to know that a specimen of the Wood Ibis, Tantalus loculator
Linn., was taken in Montana early in October, 1902. The specimen was
sent me from Madison Valley, Madison County, where it was shot by
Mr. Bert Maynard, Ennis, Mont While Mr. Maynard and two other
men were in the barnyard feeding the pigs, the bird came and lit on the
ground among the pigs and sheep and began feeding on the grain. It
was reported to be either ''very tame or very tired" and did not take
flight even when closely approached.
The bird is young and undersized and was identified for me by Edgar
A. Mearns, Major and Surgeon, U. S. A. The head and neck are not
bald as in the adult, but are clothed with the plumage of the young.
The specimen is deposited in the collections of the Montana Agricul-
tural College. — R. A. Cooley, Montana Agric. College^ Boxeman^ Mont.
Woodcock Notes. — 1 have recently received several interesting dates
regarding the occurrence of the American Woodcock (Pkilokela minor)
in Massachusetts. Mr. Edward A. Brigham of Grafton. Mass., infomu
mc that he shot a bird several years ago on Christmas Day which wa^ in
excellent condition. Also, that on March 7, 1901, he saw a bird of thi»
species — the earliest spring date in hi8>xperience. On March 17, 1903,
he put up a fine large bird at the same place. Deputy Thomas L.
Burney of Lynn, Mass., informs me that he has a specimen of a Wood-
cock, which was picked up on Estey St., Lynn, Mass., by Mr. Geo. Wood
man on Dec. 11, 1902, while still alive, but in an emaciated condition.—
GsoRCiE II. Mackay, Boston^ Mass.
A Turnstone {Arena ria inter pres) Taken in the Mid-Pacific. — 1 wa»
a passenger on the schooner * Julia E. Whalen ' returning from Marcus
Island when, on August 28, 1902, in Long. 174^ W., Lat. 33" N., a Turn-
stone came alongside; and after a few moments dropped down on the
deck. I saw the bird when it was quite a distance off, coming from a
northerly direction and flying directly for the vessel. On its nearer
approach it was not diflicult to determine the species, as it made two or
^ wf^l General Notes, 211
three narrowing circles about the schooner preparatory to alighting,
which it soon did in a dazed and somewhat exhausted condition. I
caught the bird in my hands, and on examination I found it to be literally
nothing but skin and bones. However, we were loath to take its life and
accordingly improvised a cage on the bottom of which was placed a
quantity of small pieces of rock from the ship's ballast. No sooner had
our captive been placed in the cage than it began to flip these stones over
with its beak, in search of its usual quarry. A dish containing salt water
was placed within reach. After taking a few swallows, it proceeded to
toss stones and loose bits into the receptacle with its beak, and then, for
want of something better to do, it waded in and tossed them out again.
Fresh water it did not seem to care for at all. We were at a loss to know
what we could ofier the bird from the ship's store that it would be liable
to eat. Lobster, being shell-fish, was first tried. Of this the bird would
only take bits in its bill when it would note an unusual flavor, and con-
demn it as food. Bits of oyster were tried and similarly rejected.
Tinned clam, roast meat, and fresh fish were refused. Boiled rice and
other cereals were offered without avail. Finally cockroaches, which
were the only insect pest on shipboard, were suggested and tried. It
was interesting to watch the Turnstone assault them. The bug, which
is an adept at self concealment, would no sooner strike the bottom of the
cage than it would scurry under a stone. The bright-eyed bird would
give instant chase, roll the stone to one side and snap up the bug. Then
beating it vigorously on the ground several times, it would lay it down
and observe it narrowly. Taking it up again and giving it a flnal thrash
or two it proceeded to gulp it down. Cockroaches were evidently not
suitable food, for on the second morning after its capture the bird was
found dead.
I made it into a skin, which bears a tag stating that it was an adult
male, taken on the date and in the locality mentioned, in full autumn
plumage, measuring 9.30 in. in length ; w^ing, 6.05 in. ; culmen, .85 in. ;
tarsus .95 in.
At the time the Turnstone came on board we were some 500 miles to
the north and east of Midway Island, which was the probable destination
of the bird (and where we had observed the same species only a few days
previously). Assuming the bird had started from Alaska on its fall
southerly migration it was at the time of its capture 1800 miles out from
the nearest land, and must have been in continuous flight for more than
40 hours before it sighted our vessel. The fact that it was alone was
unusual, as the species commonly migrates in small flocks, of which we
•aw quite a number while we were performing our journey of over 7000
miles in the Mid-Pacific. — Wm. Alanson Bryan, Bhhop Museum,
Honolulu^ H, I,
Nesting of the Goshawk in Southern New Hampshire. — On the 21st
of July, 1902, I came upon a large Accipiter in a clearing in some woods
212 General Notes. FjVJ
at Alstead, N. H. The bird screamed loudly and when I began to search
for a nest, flew at me twice like a bolt, so that I instinctively^ put up an
elbow to guard my head. I found a nest containing two nearly full-grown
young in a smallish pine about forty feet from the ground. On the 27th
I saw at 4.45 A. M. a full-grown Goshawk kill and begin to devour a pullet
under the window of the farm-house where I lived. I therefore on the
29th shot one of the young hawks from the nest and sent it to Mr.
Brewster, who has identified it as a young Goshawk {Accipiter atricapil-
lus), Alstead is seventeen miles from Keene, in southern New Hamp-
shire. According to Mr. G. M. Allen this is the most southern breeding
record which he can find for this bird in New England. — Ralph Hoff-
MANN, Belmont -t Mass.
Barn Owl on Long Island, N. Y. — On April 23, 1902, Mr. James
Forster, Superintendent on Harbeck Place at Islip, L. I., sent me a fine
adult American Barn Owl {Strtx pratincola) lo be mounted. The bird
was in fine plumage but rather thin in flesh. No further data could be
obtained, as Mr. Forster moved away shortly after. — Henry Mott
BuRTis, Babylon^ L. /.
The Short-eared Owl {Asio acct'pitrinns) Taken Far Out at Sea.—
The steamer * Tampico,^ which plies between Honolulu and Puget Sound,
was boarded, when 680 miles ott the mainland, by a Short-eared Owl which
had in all probability been lured out to sea in pursuit of shore birds which
at this season are in full migration, and, losing its bearings, became a
wanderer at the mercy of the high seas. The bird was observed by the
mate at 8 p. m. circling about high overhead. After a time it alighted on
one of the yards and there remained during the night and the greater part
of the following forenoon, when it was captured and placed in a cage.
Capt. Ames, regarding the captive as a mascot, and not an ill omeo,
decided to keep it alive, and ordered it to be carefully fed on a diet of raw
meat. Despite all care and attention it died Oct. 10, 1902. one day after
the steamer had arrived at Honolulu. Only the wings and feet were
preserved. I had the privilege of examining them and, together with
the description furnished by the captain, satisfied myself that the bird
was none other than an adult Asio accipitrinus. The wing measured
12.50, the tarsus about 1.75.
Since it is generally believed that the stock from which the Hawaiian
variety of owl was derived came originally from America, the above bit
of evidence may l)e regarded as in a measure confirming that view.
Taken in connection with the record of the specimen observed (in
October, 1900) by Capt. Johnson of the bark * Roderick Dhu,* tome 500
miles off the Hawaiian Islands, it makes a chain of evidence showing the
relationship of the Hawaiian 'Pueo' to the continental form, and at the
same time tending strongly to invalidate the subspecies tandvicensn tA
current writers.
^ W^T G^"^*'^^ ^^^^^ 213
That both of the foregoing records were made during the month of
October seems more than a mere coincidence. The migration of the owls
themselves, or the migration of certain birds which they pursue, may
account for it. Be that as it may, the result has been the same and these
Islands have received their stock of owls as a result of some such circum-
stance. — Wm. Alanson Bryan, Bishop Museum^ Honolulu, H. I.
Note on Psitacula modesta Cabanis. — Psitacula mode.sta Cabanis
(Schomburgk, Reisen in British-Guiana, III, 1848, 727) was described
from a female taken in British Guiana. This specimen, so far as known
to me, has until now remained unique. Count Salvadori in 1891 ( Cat.
Bds. Brit. Mus., Vol. XX, p. 245, footnote) says: "Graf von Berlepsch,
who has recently examined the typical specimen in the Museum of
Berlin, has sent me a description of it, which agrees in every respect with
the female of Psittacula sclateriP Salvin, five years earlier ( Ibis, 1886,
p. 70) stated, under Psittacula modesta : "Graf von Berlepsch is of
opinion that P, sclaieri is referable to this species. P. modesta being the
older title."
Berlepsch and Hartert, in their recent memoir * On the Birds of the
Orinoco Region * (Nov. Zool., Vol. IX, p. 108, April, 1902 ) record a male
specimen of P,* sclateri* from "La Union on the Caura River," Vene-
zuela, without further comment. This is the most eastern record of P.
sclateri I have met with, the previous records being from Peru and
Ecuador.
I have before me a male specimen taken by Mr. C. C. Young, on the
Saramaca River, Dutch Guiana, May 31, 1899. It bears a striking
resemblance to a male specimen of P, sclateri {No, 6313, Am. Mus. Nat.
Hist.), from the Verreaux Collection, labeled "Rio Javarri " ( a cotype ? ).
The Guiana bird differs in being of a lighter, more yellowish green
below, particularly on the breast, and in the rump being of a brighter
shade of ultraiparine. That the two forms are specifically the same there
teems no reason for doubt, bu^ it seems probable that the Andean form is
separable from the Guiana form, although the differences, judging from
the specimens here under notice, are not strongly marked, the two forms
being recognizable, respectively, as Psittacula modesta and P. modesta
sclateri, — J. A. Allen, American Museum of Natural History^ New
York City.
Breeding of the Evening Qrosbeak in Captivity. — In the spring of 1901,
I was given three Evening Grosbeaks alive, two females and a male, by
Mr. Geo. E. Atkinson. These birds were taken at Portage la Prairie,
Manitoba, one young female in 1899, and a pair in February, 1900. These
birds are typical Coccothraustes vespertinus, and had previously shown no
disposition to. breed, nor did they till the spring of 1902. In March I
noticed that the male was not getting on with the females as well as he
had previously, being frequently chased about by them ; in April he had
subdued them, and very soon showed a decided preference for one and so
214 General Notes, Laib?
persecuted the other that I had to remove her to a separate cage. About
this time, or a little earlier, I noted a decided brightening of the beaks of
both sexes, and the birds became very noisy, though I noticed no attempt
at a song on the male^s part.
It was the middle of June before I removed the birds to an outside avi-
ary, and they very soon began to build, though slowly at first, the male
leading in the work ; the foundation of twigs was finished by June 25,
and the walls begun. They used a good deal of excelsior, and the rootlets
from an old Catbird^s nest. The female took charge of the lining, using
dried grass in preference to hair. By the 28th the nest was finished, and
on July I the first egg was laid, the set of four eggs being completed on
the 4th. The eggs were laid in the early morning, and the male roosted
at night close beside the nest. I removed the set on the 7th, as I was
leaving for a two weeks^ absence, and could not attend to the young if
hatched. From the beginning of the nest building the male increai^d
his attention to the female, putting freshly shelled sunflower seed in her
beak and feeding her at every opportunity ; if she were sitting the food
was carried to her. Before the tgg laying both birds were noisy, uttering
their rather harsh note incessantly, but as the female became absorbed in
caring for the eggs she joined less in the outcry, and the male too became
quieter, though both birds joined in protesting if any unusual object
became visible from the cage. They were not greatly disturbed by my
entering the cage to feed them, though at first the female always left the
nest.
The male in his efforts to fix the female's attention assumed a curious
posture, very closely resembling that of a young bird when fed. He
began by alighting a little below her, preferably on the ground, throwing
his head back and uttering a low, rather harsh call, as a nestling does
when expecting food; his wings were partly spread and fluttered very
rapidly till the black primaries became an outline, causing the snow white
of the secondaries to stand out with vividness; otherwise the bird was
motionless, with the tail partly spread.
About the i6th of July three eggs of a second set were noticed in the
nest; one had disappeared before my return, and on the 30th, one of the
two remaining; c^gs hatched. The young birds' nakedness was empha-
sized in contrnst with the pure white down patches, particularly that on
the head. The second ejjg did not hatch, and I removed it. I was from
the first considerably handicapped in the matter of food; the old bird»,
as the brecdin*^ season commenced, gradually changed their food. Sun-
flower, their favorite seed, was neglected, and they ate a small amount of
lettuce and chick weed, a ^ood many strawberries, a little grated carrot and
what insects I could get for them; they refused mockingbird food but ate
the yolk of hard-boiled e«j}^s. Meal-worms I was unable to gel in any
number, but earthworms \Nere plentiful and the birds ate them in quan-
tity. The male kept a sharp lookout for any insect that wandered into
the cage; ants* eggs were also eaten. I had to use care in gathering
^'^^^J General Notes, 215
insects, as the trees in the garden had been sprayed and I feared giving
them poisoned food.
The old birds partly masticated the worms and fed them to the young
bird in the form of pellets. On the 5th of August the young Grosbeak
had its eyes open and seemed to be thriving on the food given it. On
the 13th I found it had left the nest, and I replaced it. I fancy from this
time the old birds began to neglect it, as they started to moult. On the
15th I noticed that the bird was not being properly cared for and I had to
replace it in the nest at night. The first time it resumed its place in the
nest it was covered by the female, but other nights it sat on the edge of
the nest, the parents roosting beside it. It would not consent to being fed
by me, and died on the i6th. The old birds were not at all disconcerted
at its loss, and I noticed a lessening of the number of worms consumed,
and very soon the normal fqod of seeds was resumed. Later on the birds
removed the lining from the nest and finally threw down the remainder.
The young bird's call for food was never loud.
Description of young bird^ sixteen days old, — Downy neossoptiles still
adhered to the tips of feathers. Above smoky brown bases of feathers
lighter, giving the back a mottled appearance ; top of head darker ; fore-
head creamy brown ; bare space in front of eye (lores) black. Under-
neath creamy brown ; under tail-coverts white; tail (two thirds grown)
marked as in adult female; wings black ; primaries (partly grown) edged
on outer side with creamy white; three outermost quills black; second-
aries and greater wing-coverts with broad markings of white, the coverts
showing a tinge of yellow. Bill greenish horn ; feet flesh-color.
Length 114. mm.; wing 64. mm.; tail 19. mm.
Sex, a male as nearly as could be determined; decomposition was very
rapid which, together with the age, made the sexing uncertain. Much of
the down was lost in skinning, from the same cause.
Description of eggs, — Ground color a clear blue, having distinct spots,
almost blotches, of black distributed sparingly about the middle, leaving
the smaller end clear, or almost so, the larger end more or less thinly
covered with small spots, blotches, and penciled markings of black,
accompanied more sparingly by the same markings in a washed or indis-
tinct brown; a few markings of the same about the middle. Measure-
ments: No. I,. 23 X 16 mm.; No. 2, 24 X 17 mm.; No. 3, 26 X 17 mm.
No. 1 had a very weak shell and was empty or nearly so ; No. 2, like
No. I in markings, both eggs having less of the heavy markings about
the middle. No. 3 and 4 are like the second set and probably typical. —
J. H. Fleming, Toronto^ Ontario.
A Further Note on the Subspecies of Passerculus sandwichensis
inhabiting Labrador. — Mr. J. D. Sornborger lent me some time ago for
examination three specimens of Passerculus from Labrador. Two are
from Okak, and one from Hopedale. As they are not sexed they do
not serve to amplify the data in regard to the sexual range of size the
race shows.
2 1 6 General Notes, [jjjj
No. 145 1 (52), taken at Hopedale by W. W. Perrett in 1898, in slightljr
worn plumages, measures, wing, 2.75; tail, 1.86; tarsus, .80; bill, 41 X ^3.
No. 1452 (55), taken at Okak hy C Schmitt on July 6, 1896, in
unworn plumage, measures, wing, 2.90; tail, 1.95; tarsus, .84; bill, ~|0 X .26.
No. 1453, taken at Okak by C Schmitt on June 29, 1897, in worn plum-
age, measures, wing, 2.56; tail, 1.87; tarsus, .80; bill, .39X*24.
It was pointed out by Dr. Allen in 1871 ( Winter Birds of Florida ) that
Savanna Sparrows show tremendous individual variation, which is by
the way true to a great degree in all Fringillidse, and he tabulated the
measurements of twenty-six breeding specimens from Massachusetts
which showed a range of wing measurement from 2.44 to 2.95, only two
of which, both males, however, measured over 2.80, and these two, Nos.
5092 and 5096 in the collection of the Museum of Comp. Zoology, I have
remeasured, and had my measurements checked, and find they now
measure 2.90 and 2.62 respectively. Of some hundreds of memsurements
published by others, and taken from fresh and dried skins, I have yet to
find but this one bird from south of Labrador whose wing measurement
overlaps sexed Labrador specimens.
The range of wing measurements shown by Labrador specimens which
I have examined is as follows: — males, 2.86-2.93; female, 2.65*.
Unsezed, including immature, 2.56 (worn), 2.75-2.90.
I present these facts not to help prove the validness of the race in the
face of the A. O. U. Committee's ruling, for recognition of subspecies
unfortunately is often, if not generally a matter of personal opinion and
judgment, but I present them simply as facts. — Rbginald Hbber
Howe, Jr., Concord^ Mass.
A Winter Record for the Chewink on Long Island, N. Y. — On January
12, 1903, I saw in a small piece of woodland near Long Island City,
N. Y., a male Chewink (Pipilo eryikrofkikalmus). It was in full plum-
age and very active, but permitted me to approach within twenty-five feet
of it. I have looked for it since, but have not seen it again. This is the
only instance known to me of this species wintering here. — W. F.
Hendrickson, Long Island City^ N. Y.
Note on Sylvia cserulea Wilson. — In *The Auk* for January, 1897
(XIV, p. 97), Mr. Ridgway published a short note entitled * DemdroicM
ccerulea vs. Dendroica rara^"* stating that Sylvia cttrulea Wilson ( 1810)
was unfortunately preoccupied by Sylvia ccerulea Latham ( 1790), and that
the earliest tenable specific name for the Cerulean Warbler is rara
( Sylvia rara ) Wilson, 181 1 . Of course, here was a clear case, provided the
^Specimen kindly loaned by Mr. W. E. Clyde Todd, No. 393, Carnegie
Museum, taken at Nain, Aug. 26, 1901, by D. A. Atkinson. Appreciably
larger than the average of southern females.
^^^1 General Notes. 2 1 7
^ts were as alleged. In the same number of * The Auk* (p. 131) the
proposed change was endorsed by the A. O. U. Committee on Nomen-
clature (Eighth Supplement), and is of course adopted in Mr. Ridgway's
'Birds of North and Middle America' (Part II, p. 570).
In *The Auk' for April. 1899 (XVI, p. 185), Mr. Oberholser called
attention to the ruling of the A. O. U. Committee on this case, and
showed that in accordance with this ruling the name of the House Finch
would be Carpodacus mexicanus obscurus (McCall) instead of C. m. fron-
talis (Say), on the ground that Say's name Fringilla frontalis (1823) was
preoccupied by a Fringilla frontalis Vieillot (181 7). Mr. Oberholser
evidently accepted the Committee's ruling on the Dendroica ccerulea case
with reservation, which he says "involves an interpretation of Canon
XXXUI of the A- O. U. Code of Nomenclature to which little if any
attention seems to have been called." He continues : "It appears advis-
able to raise this question, inasmuch as it affects the validity of some
other current names; and this the more as in regard to it there seems to
be neither unanimity of opinion nor uniformity of practice. Briefly
stmted, it is this : in considering the tenability of specific names, so far
as preoccupation is concerned, shall any account be taken of homonyms
which are mere combinations . e., not original descriptions? To illus-
trate: Motacilla cetrulea of Linnaeus, 1766, was called Sylvia ccerulea by
Latham in 1790, — evidently a simple transfer of Linnaeus's species to
another genus. Now, does this Sylvia ccerulea of Latham, 1790, preclude
the use of Sylvia arrulea Wilson, 1810, for another and widely different
species, the former being now a Polioftila^ and the latter a Dendroica ?
Canon XXXIII is apparently quite explicit upon this point, its text being
as follows : * .... a specific or subspecific name is to be changed when it
has been applied to some other species of the same genus, or used previ-
ously in combination with the same generic name.' The phrase, ' or used
previously in combination with the same generic name,' seems to leave
no doubt of its meaning ; and a strictly literal interpretation of this clause
will treat alike all combinations, whether or not they happen to be those
of original descriptions."
I have quoted Mr. Oberholser at length, for the reason that he has
stated the case so fully and concisely. The phraseology of that portion
of Canon XXXIII quoted by Mr. Oberholser is open to his construction
of it, and apparently to no other. Yet that no such ruling was intended
by the Committee I am sure ; for (if I may be pardoned a seemingly
egotistical reminiscence) I may say that I formulated Canon XXXIII,
and the explanatory remarks under it, and I am sure that nothing was
further from my intention, or that of the Committee, than to enact a
provision open to a construction so at variance with general usage in such
matters, and with the practices of the Committee, previously (as individ-
uals) and since. The two pages of ' remarks ' under Canon XXXIII discuss
all phases of the subject except this, and clearly show that the Committee
had in mind only homonyms given as names to species described as new,
2 1 8 General Notes. [j^
and not homonvms due to the shuffling of names, or to the reclasttfication
of species under other genera than those under which thejr were originalljr
described. In fact, any other construction never occurred to me prior to
Mr. Oberholser's discussion of the case of Sylvta cttrulea Wilson.
In regard to the action of the Committee on this case, I must confess,
with shame, that I did not look up the matter, and did not know that
Latham's Sylvia cttrulea was simpljr Linnaeus*s Motacilla cttruUa^ but
supposed Latham's Sylvia cterulea was bestowed upon a species con-
sidered hy him as not previously described.
As 1 had never before known of any attempt to change a name in
ornithology on such grounds I was taken quite unawares, and voted for
the change without knowing the real facts in the case. Whether or not
the original change was an inadvertence on the part of Mr. Ridgway, he
has in other cases followed a directly opposite course. In the case of
the House Finch the Committee ruled (Tenth Suppl., Auk, July, 1901,
311) that Fringilla frontalis Vieillot, 181 7, did not render invalid Frin-
gilla frontalis Say, 1824, for the reason that Vieillot's Fringilla frontalis
was simply the reference of a previous Loxia frontalis to the genus Frin-
gilla. This case is perfectly parallel to that of Dendroica carnlea vs. Z>.
rara^ which has not heretofore been formally challenged, and thus has
not come before the Committee for reconsideration. — J. A. Allen, Am.
Mus. Nat. Hist., New York City.
A Late Pall Record for the Cape May Warbler {Dendroica tigrina)
in Eastern Massachusetts. — Toward dusk of Oct. 9, 1902, at the time
when smaller birds are actively moving about, I noticed a few restless
warblers in a Norway maple near my home in Ponkapog, Mass. It was
impossible for me to determine the species, as they remained near the top
of the tree, but one bird was shot, and proved an immature female Cape
May Warbler. I am not positive as to the identity of the other birds in
this group, but one other bird which I saw was not Dendroica tigrina. —
Frki). B. Mt Kechnie, Boston, Mass.
Late Records for Eastern Massachusetts. — Mr. Louis A. Shaw of
Chestnut llill, Mass., informs me that he shot on the 20th of November,
1902, an adult male Wilson's Warbler ( Wilsonia pMsilla), which he had
first noted on the previous day. This is the second record of the capture
of this warbler in late autumn in Massachusetts (Hoffmann, Auk, 1900,
p. 196). Mr. Shaw also reports seeing Fox Sparrows {Passerella iliaca)
on December 4, 1902, and a Rubvi'rowned Kinglet {Regulus calendula)
on November 16, 1902. — RntiiNALi) IIkhkr Howe, Jr., Concord^ Afass.
A Case of Mistaken Diagnosis. — In August, 18S2, while searching in
an aiuient shell-heap near Northeast Harbor, Mt. Desert Island, Maine, I
found what appeared to be the upper mandible of a bird's bilL In the
same shell-heap, two years before, I had found part of the tarsus of a
^^W^l Recemt Liieraturw, 2 1 9
wild turkey (Bull. Nutt. Omith. Club, Vol. VI, 1881, p. 60). Taking the
* bill ^ to Mr. Wm. Brewster for identification we found that it resembled
most closely the bill of Cabot's Tern, being considerably smaller than
the bill of the Royal Tern. It differed, however, from the bills of these
and other terns in having a very hard epidermis with a brilliant polish.
Feeling considerable doubt as to the identity of the specimen, I showed it
to Mr. J. A. Allen, who believed that it was not in his province and sug-
gested that Mr. Walter Faxon might clear up the mystery. Respecting the
Crustacea, Mr. Faxon, however, promptly replied that it was not a crab's
claw. At Mr. Brewster's suggestion I then sent it on to the Smithsonian
institution and received the following reply. "Where Mr. Brewster has
failed I ought perhaps to be duly cautious in expressing an opinion.
Nevertheless a careful examination and comparison of the fragment of a
bird's bill vou enclose leaves little doubt in my mind as to the bird, which
is the Royal Tern (Sterna regia). Compare the remnant with the bill of
that bird and I think you will agree that in contour the agreement is very
close. The cutting edges of the fragment are worn down, and the size
other\vise reduced by rubbing, as witness its polish. Due allowance being
made for loss of size, and it appears to me that the conclusion expressed
above is inevitable .... I should have added that Mr. agrees with
me." Not satisfied with the identification I let the matter rest and did not,
fortunately, rush into print with the interesting note. Two vears later,
while examining a dogfish, Sgualus americanusy I was struck with the
resemblance of the spine in front of the anterior doVsal fin to my shell-
heap bird's bill with its polished epidermis. On comparing them the
identity is unquestionable. — Charles W. Townsend, M. I>., Boston^
Mass.
RECENT LITERATURE.
Ornithological Magazines. * The Condor.' — The fourth volume of
'The Condor,' 1 for IQ02, consists of about 150 quarto pages of excellent
matter relating mainly to Pacific coast ornitholo<;fv. The Januaiy-
* The Condor, Bulletin of the Cooper Omithologioal Club of California.
Published bi-monthly at Santa Clara. Cal., ill the interests and as ihe official
organ of the Club. Waller K. Kisher, Editor. Palo Alto, Cal. : Joseph
Grinnell, Business Manager, Palo Alto, Cal. Subscription, Si.oo a year in
advance; single copies, 25 cents. Vol. IV, 1902, pp. i-iv, 1-14S, with num-
erous half-tone illustrations.
220 Recent Literature. [jjj^
February number includes * A Trip to Mono Lake, Ornithological and
Otherwise,' by Walter K. Fisher (with half-tone illustrations) ; * A Study
of Bird Songs,' by John J. Williams; * The Pinyon Jay/ by II. C Johnson ;
*The Crissal Thrasher in California,* by M. F. Oilman ; • The L(»ui»«tana
Tanager,* by J. H. Bowles; * The Wingless Cormorant of the Galapagos/
by Rollo H. Beck ; and numerous shorter articles, including local records
of interest, editorials, reviews, and the official minutes of the Club.
This number appears with a new cover design, by Walter K. Fisher,
''typifying the land of the setting sun and its lordly condor.'' The adop-
tion of three editorial rules is announced, as follows : (i) The omission
of "the possessive 5" in common names of animals and plants, unless a
contributor expressly requests its retention. It looks a little odd to see
* Clarke Crow,* instead of the familiar * Clarke's Crow/ and so on with
similar names, but *' as the name was given in the sense of a dedication,
no particular ownership being intended or implied/' the innovation has
much in its favor, and this form will doubtless seem natural and proper
as soon as its novelty wears off. But we can hardly give consent to
< pinyon ' and * canyon,* etc., although this form has recently acquired a
wide vogue, even among writers from whom we should expect better
things. (2) The use of the single t', in the genitive singular of specific
and subspecific names — a very convenient rule, and in most cases a more
correct form than iV, which is often absolutely incorrect ; but the change is
contrary to the A. O. U. Canon XL, which requires : "The original orthog-
raphy of a name is to be rigidly preserved, unless a typographical error
is evident." This rule is intended to prohibit the emendation of names,
particularly generic names, as the context clearly implies, since the ending
of specific and subspecific names is necessarily subject to modification to
make them agree in gender with the name of the genus. It is perhaps to
be regretted that the A. O. U. Committee did not provide for a uniform
ending of the genitive singular, so that we might avoid such abomina-
tions as coopern\ gairdnerii^ etc., and auduboni^ bachmani^ etc., with
either one i or two /V, as the original describer happened to write; and
whether he used one 1 or two no one can ever certainly remember and
must verify by looking up the case. (3) The printing of the initial letter
of common names in lower case, unless personal or geographic. This
may do in newspapers and magazines, and in general literature, but for
strictly ornithological works or journals it strikes us as in bad taste, in
all instances where a particular species is formally mentioned.
The March-April number contains * The Scissor-tailed Flycatcher/ by
Florence Merriam Bailey; *Some Experiences of 1901/ by P. M. Sillo-
way ; • Hummingbird Experiences from my Note Book,* by MolHe Bryan ;
* Winter Observations on the Colorado Desert,' by F. S. Daggett ; • A
tew Notes on the Nesting of Trockilus alexandri^^ by R. S. Wucste; also
many < records ' and shorter communications, including letters and the
official minutes of the Club ; and in addition to these several technical
papers. The latter include * Status of Cyanocitta steiieH cmrbonmcem
^*?w*] Recent Literature. 221
Grinnell/ by Walter K. Fisher, and * The Monterey Fox Sparrow,' bv
Joseph Grmnell. Mr. Fisher attempts to defend carbonacea against the
dictum of the A. O. U. Committee (namely, "Not considered worthy of
recognition by name"), and incidentally gives a synopsis of the western
jays of the stelleri group, illustrating their ranges by a map, and indi-
cating thereon * areas of intergradation.* While the question is merely
one of opinion between Mr. Fisher and the Committee as to whether the
degree of differentiation characterizing carbonacea is * worthy of recogni-
tion by name,' the paper is an interesting and valuable contribution to
our knowledge of just what are the differences between the several races
of these jays, their ranges, and areas and manner of intergradation.
Mr. Grinnell believes that Monterey winter specimens of Passerella
represent the Fringilla meruloides of Vigors, whose breeding range is
assumed to be the Yakutat Bay region of Alaska, and that Ridgway's
Passerella iliaca anncctens is merely Vigors's meruloides renamed.
The May-June number contains : * Among the Sea Birds of the Oregon
Coa8(<^ by William L. Finley; * Nesting of the Prairie Falcon,* by
O. W. Howard ; 'Notes on a small collection of Birds from the Island of
Maui, Hawaii,', by Richard C McGregor; * Unprotected Breeding
Grounds,' by Vernon Bailey ; * A Study of Bird Songs ' (Chapter II), by
John J. Williams ; and the usual shorter communications, reviews, and
official minutes, with, in addition, two technical papers, as follows : *The
Downy Woodpeckers of California,* by Walter K. Fisher; and * The
Western Barn Swallow,* by Joseph Grinnell. Mr. Fisher separates the
"so-called Gairdner Woodpecker from California" from " typical
gairdneri oi Oregon and Washington under the name Dryobaies fubes-
cens turati^ founded on Picus turati of Malherbe," on the ground of
smaller size and lighter coloration. He gives a synopsis of the Western
races of the Downy Woodpecker, ol which he recognizes four, namely :
(i) Dryobates pubescens nehoni OhcrhoXstTy (2) D. p. leucurus (Hartlaub
z=z D. p. homorus Cabanis =: /?. /. crtfarf«5" Batchelder), (3) D. p. gaird-
neri (\.ud.)^ (4) D.p. /«rtf// (Malherbe).
Mr. Grinnell bestows the name Hirundo erythrogastra palmeri on the
H. e. unalasckkensis W. Palmer {nee Gmelin ), which he says shows a
"significant tendency toward Hirundo tytleri ]er don of Kamtschatka."
The July-August number has * Incubation Advanced/ by Corydon
Chamberlin; * Vocal Powers of the Yellow-billed Magpie,' by H. R.
Noack ; * Some Echoes from the Sierra,' by Chester Barlow ; * Notes on
the Black-throated Gray Warbler,' by C. W. Bowles ; ' Nesting of the
Little Flammulated Screech Owl on San Gorgonia Mountain,' by M.
French Gilman ; * Winter Plumage of the Black-tailed Gnatcatcher,* by H.
S. Swarth; *An Unusual Set of Eggs of Clarke Nutcracker,' by H. C.
Johnson; * Notes on the Verdin,' by M. French Gilman; * Bird Studies in
Strawberry Valley, Aug. 25-Oct. 25, 1902' [sic], by Mrs. C A. Moody;
'A Domesticated White Pelican' (illustrated); and the usual * notes,'
reviews, editorial matter, correspondence, etc., including an extended
222 Recent Literature. Fa^
review by ' W. K. F.* of Grinneirs * Check-List of California Birds.* Also
a paper on *The Southern White-headed Woodpecker,* by Joseph Grio-
nell, who separates the southern form as Xenopicus graxHrosiris^ on the
basis of its "much heavier bill and slightly larger size." Although ''the
differences between X. albolarvatut and X, gravirostris are slight, and
apparently exist only in dimensions, chiefly those of the bill," it Is given
rank as a full species, and this, notwithstanding the admission that
*< geographical continuity of ranges possibly exists ; but it seems quite as
likely that a broad hiatus exists in the vicinity of Tehachapi Pass." This
affords another instructive illustration of Mr. GrinnelKs criterion for
species {cf. Auk, XIX, 1902, p. 406). No measurements are given, but
the bills of both forms are illustrated by outline figures.
The September-October number contains *In Memoriam: Dr. James
G. Cooper,* by W. Otto Emerson, with portrait; 'The Ornithological
Writings of Dr. J. G. Cooper,* by Joseph Grinnell, consisting of an anno-
tated list of his papers ; * A Letter from Dr. Coues to Dr. Cooper.' dated
Feb. 21, 1869; *Some Observations on the Rufous-crowned Sparrow/ by
C. Barlow (illustrated); *The Redwood Belt of Northwestern Cali-
fornia. I. Faunal Peculiarities of the Region,* by Walter K. Fisher;
' Status of the Arizona Goldfinch in California,* by Joseph Grinnell
(considered as "only an extreme, and by no means uncommon male
plumage of the Arkansas Goldfinch); 'Nesting of Swainson Hawk,' bj
C. S. Sharp; * Audubon Warbler in Washington,' by J. H. Bowles; 'A
Study of the Black-headed Grosbeak,* by Anna Head; and editorial
comment, ' notes,* etc.
The November-December number contains: 'Birds of the Little Sur
River, Monterey County,* by Joseph Grinnell; 'The Holba^ll Grebe in
Montana,' by P. M. Silloway ; *The Redwood Belt in Northwestern Cali-
fornia. II. Land Birds,* by Walter K. Fisher (63 species); *A List of
Birds collected in Norton Sound, Alaska,* by Richard C. McGregor (64
species) ; * The Least Tern at San Diego,' [by F. W. Kelsey]. A notice
of the death of the Editor of *The Condor,' Chester Barlow; a letter
from Garrett Newkirk, and reviews of several ornithological papers bv
♦J. G.' and ' W. K. F.' complete the number, which closes the vcar'K
volume of 148 pages, illustrated with numerous half-tones.
With the beginning of Volume V the editorship of *The Condor' wa»
assumed by Mr. Walter K. Fisher, who is well fitted for the position, and
under whose supervision we trust that the prosperity and usefulness
which has hitherto char.ncterized this excellent journal will be still further
increased.
* Bird- Lore.' — As is perhaps well-known, * Bird Lore' is a strictly non-
technical ornithological magazine, even to the uniform exduKion of
technical bird names. It is conducted on a high plane as regards literarv
standing and merit, and its two-fold aim is the promotion of bird studr
among the people at large and the protection of birds. Typographical! v.
as regards text and illustrations, it is a model of book-making, and its
^^^] Recent Literature. 223
matter, while non-technical, is scientifically accurate, and its methods for
popularizing the study of ornithology are devised with excellent fore-
thought, and provide instruction on broad and well-systematized lines.
The editor^s experience as an investigator, and lecturer on ornithology,
and his enthusiasm as a bird-lover, fit him especially for the task of edit-
ing a magazine of the scope and purpose of ^ Bird-Lore.* The magazine
consists of the following departments : * General Articles,' of varied
scope, mostly contributed by well-known writers on ornithology; *For
Teachers and Students/ mostly editorial matter; * For Young Observers * ;
* Notes from Field and Study * ; * Book News and Reviews,' including
notices of the leading ornithological magazines, and of the leading papers
and books on both technical and popular ornithology; * Editorial'; and
'Audubon Department,' edited by Mrs. Mabel Osgood Wright. In the
following notice of Volume IV, for 1902,* it will be impossible to mention
more than a few of the leading articles of each number.
January-February number, general articles : * Recollections of Elliott
Coues,' by D. G. Elliot, with portrait of Coues at twenty-one ; * Couck at
his First Army Post,' by Capt. C. A. Curtis, U. S. A. (retired) ; * Extract
from Journal of Elliott Coues' First Journey to the West' (from Am. Nat.»
June, 1871); * The Western Evening Grosbeak,' by Wm. Rogers Lord;
» Bird Clubs in America. I.- The Nuttall Club,' by Francis H. Allen
(illustrated with a full-page photograph of the Nuttall Club in session) ;
* Bird-Lore's Advisory Council ' (giving names and addresses of the 63
members of the Council); *How to Name the Birds. Studies of the Fami-
lies of the Passeres,* by Frank M. Chapman (a series of illustrated papers
running through the year) ; * The Christmas Bird Census' (reports from
numerous correspondents giving lists of birds observed on Christmas day,
1901, at many widely separated localities). * For Young Observers,' con-
tains a * prize essay* on the Crow, by Fred T. Morrison (aged 11). Then
follows: *Book News and Reviews,' including reviews of Ridgway's
'Birds of North and Middle America,* Part I, the 'Proceedings of the
Nebraska Ornithologists' Union,' Seton's ' Lives of the Hunted,' and
Kellogg's 'Elementary Zocilogy,' by the editor, and of ' The Condor," by
'T. S. P.,' and ' The Osprey,' by 'A. K. F.' A page of short editorials,
and ' The Audubon Societies* complete the number, this latter depart-
ment including 'A Midwinter Meditation,' by Mrs. Wright (pp. 37-39),
' Bird-Lore. An Illustrated Bi-monthly Magazine devoted to the Study and
Protection of Birds. Edited by Frank M. Chapman. Official Organ of the
Audubon Societies. Audubon Department edited by Mabel Osgood Wright.
Vol. IV, 1902. The Macmillan Company, Harrisburg, Pa., and New York
City. Royal 8vo, pp. i-viii -f 1-208. Subscription rates, United States,
Canada and Mexico, 20 cents a number, $1.00 a year; in all countries in the
International Postal Union, 25 cents a number, $1.25 a year, post-paid.
2 24 Recent Literature, \j$i,
full of pertinent hints to the over-zealous bird-student, in this author*s
best vein of * putting things/ This department also contains a • Direc-
tory of State Audubon Societies,* and the * Fifth Annual Report of the
Pennsylvania Audubon Society/ by its secretary, Mrs. Julia Stocton
Robins. There are also two half-tone illustrations of a Crow Roost, near
Salem, N. J., from photographs by moonlight, taken by C. D. Kellogg.
The foregoing indicates the general character of the contents of each
number. Respecting the other five numbers of Vol. IV, only very gen-
eral reference can be made. March-April number : * Voices of a New
England Marsh,' by William Brewster (pp. 43-56, illustrated); * Bird
Clubs in America. II. The Delaware Valley Club,' by Samuel N. Rhoads
(with a photograph of the Club in session) ; * English Starling,* by Edith
M. Thomas (poem) ; and the usual instalment of * How to Name the
Birds,' and the usual reviews and other departmental matter, including a
noteworthy paper by Mrs. Wright on * After Legal Protection, What.*'
May-June number: 'The Increase of the Chestnut-sided Warbler,' by
A. Radclyffe Dugmore (illustrated); •The Chcbec's First Brood,' by
Francis H. Herrick (illustrated) ; * The Wood Thrush and the Whip-poor-
will.' by Garrett Newkirk (poem, illustrated); *A Grebe Colony,* by
Gerard A. Abbott. * How to Name the Birds* (illustrated), and the usual
varied department matter concludes the number, which gives a very fall
account of the * First Meeting of the National Committee of the Audubon
Societies of the United States,* held in New York City, April 4, 1902.
July-August number : « Concerning the * Bad Repute of Whiskey John,'
by Fannie Hardy Eckstorm ; * Nighthawk Notes,' by George H. Selleck
(illustrated); « The Veery's Note,' by Ernest Crosby (poem); 'The Nest-
in i; of the Yellow-throated Vireo,* by John Hutchins. September-October
number: * The Destructive Effect* of a Hail-storm upon Bird Life/ by
II. McI. Morton, M. D. (at Minneapolis, Minn.); * A Goldfinch Idyl,' by
Ella Gilbert Ives (illustrated) ; ' A Question of Identity,' editorial, am^wer-
in«i the question "What constitutes justifiable grounds for publicly
recording the occurrence of an exceedingly rare species, or of a species
beyond the limits of its own country .^ *' * A Debt of Bird Student*,*
editorial, — their obligations to the American Ornithologists' Union.
November-December number: * On Journal Keeping,' by Ernest
Thompson Scton ; • Flamingoes' Nests/ by Frank M. Chapman, giving
views of nests in situ of colonics of these birds, and an account, from
personal observation, of the Bahama colonies ; *The Weapons of Birdft,*
by Frederic A. Lucas (illustrated); 'Whiskey John in Colorada,' by
Edward R. Warren (illustrated); 'Bird-Lore's Advisory Council, — por-
traits of William Dutcher, T. Gilbert Pearson, Lynds Jones, and E. W.
Nelson; 'How to Study Birds,' by Frank M. Chapman, — the first of a
series of illustrated papers, to run throuf^h Vol. V, giving instructions to
students as to how and what to observe in studying birds. *Thc Screech
Owl's Valentine,' a poem by Florence A. Van Sant, and the usual field
notes, correspondence, reviews, Audubon Society Reports, report of the
V«1.XX
19m
J Recent Lit€rature. 2 25
Twentieth Congress of the A. O. U., etc., complete the number, which
contains also the Index to the volume.
*The Wilson Bulletin.* — As a popular magazine of ornithology *The
Wilson Bulletin/ which has just completed the ninth volume of its sec-
ond series (fourteenth of the whole series), fills a very important place in
the journals of its class. The Volume for 1902^ contains in each number
from four to eight general articles, various notes, and a few pages each of
editorial matter and reviews of recent books and papers on ornithology.
Its scope is defined as "the study of living birds'*; — their habits, their
relations to their surroundings, and their economic relations to man.
Naturally it is a strong supporter of bird protection and of popular bird
study, especially in the field.
The March number contains : *The Rock Nuthatch [Si//a syriaca] and
its Nest,* by H. C Tracy, with illustrations,' * Food Habits of the Wilson
Snipe,* by Benj. T. Gault; ' Notes on the Winter Birds of Arkansas/ by
N. Hollister (an annotated list of about 50 species) ; ' A Columbus [Ohio]
Mid-winter Horizon,* by W. Leon Dawson ; four pages of ' Notes * relat-
ing mostly to Ohio winter birds, by the editor ; * Some Franklinville
Fringillines,* by * Franklin* — a humorous skit on trinomialism ; five
pages of editorial notes and comment, and six pages of reviews. The
June number has : * Bird Studies in Lorain County, Ohio. Winter Stud-
ies,* by Lynds Jones (pp. 37-58, with a map of the county), a summary
of ornithological and weather conditions, covering several winters, with
pertinent comment ; * A Preliminary List of the Birds of Yakima County,
Washington,* by Wm. Leon Dawson (an annotated list of 123 species);
Incubation Period of the Mockingbird,* by John W. Daniel, Jr. ; 'A Bird
New for Ohio,* by Lynds Jones (Mareca fenelope) ; and five pages of
editorial matter, notes, and reviews.
The September number has: *A Preliminary List of the Birds of
Middle Southern Ohio,* by Rev. W. F. Henninger (noticed in ' The Auk,*
XX, 1903, p. 83) ; * The Spring Migration of 1901,' with an Average Table
for Lorain County, Ohio, by R. L. Baird ; * Maryland Birds,' by Rev.
J. H. Langille; *Kirtland*8 Warbler (Dendroica ktrtlandi) again in Ohio,'
by Lynds Jones (two observed opposite Ashland, Ky., Aug. 28, 1902);
and six pages of editorial matter, notes, and reviews.
The December number contains : • The Cuban Tody ( Xodus muliicolor)^
by John W. Daniel, Jr., with a half-tone plate ; * Some Bluebird Boxes
and Troubles.* by Frank Bruen ' ; ' My Summer Boarders, Season 1902,'
by Wm. J. Mills; 'All Day with the Birds, May 7, 1902,* authorship not
* The Wilson Bulletin, Published Quarterly by the Wilson Ornithological
Chapter of the Agassiz Association. Edited by Lynds Jones, Oberlin, Ohio.
Old Series, Vol. XIV ; New Series, Vol. IX, 1902. 8vo, pp. 144, with illustra-
tions. Subscription, 50 cents a year. Published on the 15th of March, June,
September, and December.
226 Recent Liter atmre, Fjf'J'
stated ; * Winter Birds/ by Lynds Jones (Scioto and Pike Counties, Ohio,
and Bristol, Conn.) ; * An Addition to the Birds of Middle Southern
Ohio,* {Larus philadelfhia) by W. F. Henninger ; * A New Year Horizon
for All,* by the Editor; * A New Bird for Ohio, Red-legged Duck {Anas
obscura rubrifes)^ by W. F. Henninger; and ten pages of editorial mat-
ter, * general notes,* reviews, and correspondence.
In the December number the editor briefly reviews the history of the
nine volumes of * The Wilson Bulletin,* forming the * New Series,* in
which he says : ''From a small beginning our official organ has come to
fill a place in the study of our birds which we may well point to with
pride. While the development has been slow it has been sure.*^ This is
indeed a modest claim, in view of the many valuable papers that in recent
years have resulted from the work of various members of the 'Wilson
Ornithological Chapter,* and which have found a medium of publication
in *The Wilson Bulletin * ; for all of which great credit is due to the efforts
and example of the editor, Professor Lynds Jones of Oberltn. — J. A. A
Jacobs's ^ The Story of a Martin Colony.* * — This is a very interesting
and suggestive account of the growth and prosperity of a Purple Martin
colony under the author*s protecting care during a period of seven years
— 1896-1902 — at Waynesburg, Pennsylvania. In 1896 a twenty-room
bird house was ereAed by the author in his grounds, but to his dis-
appointment only one pair of birds at first availed themselves of these
ample accommodations, but later these were joined by four other pairs, of
which "the males were all birds of the previous year." But through dis-
turbances by English Sparrows and other mishaps only eleven young
birds reached maturity. The next year ten pairs took possession and
35 young birds "were successfully brought out." The third year addi-
tional house room was provided by the erection of a new 34-room dormi-
tory. This was occupied by fourteen nesting pairs, and thirteen of the
males being birds of the previous year led Mr. Jacobs to believe that all
were from the house first erected. The number of young reaching
maturity this season was between 90 and 100, several mishaps having
interfered with the prosperity of the colony. The wonderful increase in
three years prompted the erection of further quarters in 1899, and the
colony continued to increase. In 1901 there were 67 pairs of nesting
birds, and in 1902 the annual census of the colony, taken May 28, gave
the following results : "Rooms occupied, 73; containing eggs, 50; con-
taining both eggs and young, 2 ; nests undergoing construction, 20;
total number of eggs and young on this date, 245."
1 Gleanings | No. II. | The Story of a | Martin Colony. | Illustrated. | — |
Observations on a Colony | of Purple Martins. | (Progne Subb.) | — | By J.
Warren Jacobs. | — | Waynesburg, Pa., | Independent Book and Job Ofiice.
I 1903. — Svo, pp. 24, and 3 half-tone plates. Price, 35 cents.
^w«^^] . Recent Literature, 227
Mr. Jacobs*8 brochure contains three half-tone plates, illustrating the
houses with their colonies of breeding birds, and the general narrative of
the founding and increase of the colony is followed hy sections entitled :
* Return from the South,' giving the dates of spring arrivals from 1891
to 1902 ; * Nest Building, Deposition and Number of Eggs, and Incuba-
tion,* and relates the manner of nest building, the number of eggs to the
set, and the length of the period of incubation. The record shows that
a total of 1 1 50 eggs were laid during the seven years, and that 850 young
reached maturity. *The Growing Young and the Parents* Care* is the
title of a most interesting and instructive chapter, and is followed by:
* Something about Their Food*; 'Their Enemies, Causes of Death,
etc' ; * Off to the South ' ; * A Chapter on a Cabinet Series of Their
Eggs*; and * On the Construction of Houses/ The author says: ''I
have robbed my pets but I do not wear their feathers in my hat ! " Dur-
ing the seven years of his fostering care he confesses to having taken
eleven sets of eggs for study, of which one had been deserted, and the
others were soon followed by the deposition of second sets. The sets
vary in number from 3 to 7 eggs to the set, and the size of the eggs is
largest in the smallest set, but the smallest average size does not always
coincide with the largest number of eggs to the set.
in short, Mr. Jacobs*8 history of his Martin colony is a valuable contri-
bution to ornithology, as regards both the economic and natural history
phases of the subject. — J. A. A.
Pycrmft on ' The Significance of the Condition of Young Birds at
Birth.** — Mr. Pycraft believes that too much stress has been laid by
systematists on the widely diverse conditions the young of different
groups of birds present at birth, as regards their helplessness or other-
wise, and whether clothed or more or less naked ; and further claims that
the significance of these conditions has been misunderstood. "The real
explanation of the matter," he says, "seems rather to turn upon a ques-
tion of expediency, designed, so to speak, to reduce infant mortality." He
claims to present facts "strong enough, on the one hand, to refute the
older views, and on the other, to justify the theory, firstly, that birds were
originally arboreal and their young nidifugous ; secondly, that nidicolous
habits and helplessness of young birds are specialized adaptations to an
arboreal or gregarious mode of life ;'and, thirdly, that the young of galli-
naceous birds form a link in the chain of evolution of nidifugous habits.
The free finger tip and arrested development of the outer quill-feathers
point to a prior arboreal habit, whilst the accelerated development of the
inner quill-feathers indicates an adaptation to enable the young to escape
>The Significance of the Condition of the Young at Birth. By W. P.
Pycraft, A. L. S., F. Z. S. Popular Science Monthly, Vol. LXII, Dec. 1902,
pp. 1 08-1 16.
22o J^ecemt Littraturt. LAbJ
from the enemies surrounding a terrestrial nurserjr. The third and last
stage is represented by the protective coloration, a device which has been
almost universally adopted by nidifugous birds, owing to its greater
effectiveness."
The Hoatzin is taken as the main clew to the problem. In the structure
of its wing ''we have a revelation of a phase of bird-life hitherto unsus-
pected; inasmuch as its peculiar developmental stages, each with its
period of functional activity, enable us to interpret the hitherto meaning-
less and puzzling characters seen in the wing of the fowl and turkey, and
their allies. These constitute well-nigh invincible proofs of an earlier and
universal arboreal existence, extending back to the time of the earliest
known bird archaeopteryx. Certainly the skeleton, especially the wing,
lends the strongest support to this view. This carries us further back
still, and suggests the conclusion that the reptile stock from which the
aves are descended was probably also arboreal."
He explains that infant mortality could be reduced (i) by depositing
the eggs on the ground, or (2) curtailing the activity of the young, the
latter being produced by reducing the amount of food-yolk and inducing
an earlier hatching period. But sp^ce will not permit us to give a synop-
sis of his many ingenious suggestions. — J. A. A.
Strong on a Case of Abnormal Plumage.^ — The case here described
is that of an abnormal condition in the juvenal plumage of a hybrid
between the Common Ring Dove {Turtur risorius) and the Red Ring
Dove {T. humilis) of China, in which the remiges, rectrices and contour
feathers were crossed by a subterminal band of paler color, in which the
barbules were imperfectly developed. "It is significant," says the author.
"that these abnormalities occur at uniform distances from the distal ends
of the feathers throughout the whole plumage, and it seems reasonable to
conclude that the conditions responsible for the abnormalities were con-
stitutional, and affected the germs of all the feathers simultaneously,
though in three dilterent degrees of intensity." The abnormalities ire
ascribed to malnutrition at the time the juvenal plumage was developing.
The character of the malformation is described in detail and illustrated
with figures. — J. A. A.
Trowbridge on ' The Relation of Wind to Bird Migration.' * — In * The
Auk' for July, 1895 (XII, pp. 259-270), Mr. Trowbridge published an inter-
esting paper on ' Hawk Flights in Connecticut.' The present paper con-
tains further observations on the migrations of hawks in southern Con-
1 A Case of Abnormal Plumage. By R. M. Strong. Biolog. Bull., Vol. HI,
No. 6, pp. 289-294, with 6 text figures. Nov. 1902.
' The Relation of Wind to Bird Migration. By C. C. Trowbridge. Aroer.
Nat., Vol. XXXVI, 1902, pp. 735-753, with 3 maps.
^iJ^] Rectnt Liitraiurt, %7S^
necticut, and on the effect of the wind on the migrations of. various oth^r
species of birds. His conclusions are as follows :
^ I. That the migratory movements of hawks are largely determined by
the direction of the wind, hawks regularly depending on favorable winds
as a help in mig^tion.
^2. That an adverse wind not only retards the migratory movement,
tet that it almost completely arrests It.
"3. That the^migratory period of the various species of hawks lasts
for from about fifteen days to one month ; during this time the migratory
movements take place on days when favorable winds occur.
"4. When the wind is favorable and approximately parallel to the direc-
tion of migration, hawks fiy and sail at a high altitude and occasionally
soar in circles.
"5. When the wind is favorable but nearly perpendicular to the migra-
tory direction (the favorable component being small), hawks fly low and
soar continually, often alternating soaring with the wind and flying or
sailing against it.
"6. That hawks migrate during the daylight, and, other conditions
being the same, they are most abundant in migratory nights when the
atmosphere is clear.
''7. When a migratory flight of hawks takes place, continued favorable
winds exhaust the number of hawks ready to n^ake the migratory journey,
but a second favorable wind about one week later may cause a second
flight equal in magnitude to the first.
^8. That a favorable wind, when the favorable component is small,
may caus^ decided deviations of the course of migrating birds from the
main migrating direction."
The author believes that other birds take advantage of favorable winds
in migrating, and that in the case of the Falconidae the habit has become
well formed. Several tables are given showing the influence of weather
conditions upon the flights of migrating hawks in southern Connecticut.
A series of maps of the coast-line of the New England States and New
Jersey is given showing the lines of flight of hawks in both autumn and
spring in relation to the direction of the wind. — J. A. A.
Richmond on Birds from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.* — The
collection contains 520 specimens, representing nearly 100 species, col-
lected mostly at the Great and Little Nicobar Islands by Dr. W. L. Abbott.
Nine species are described as new. Besides giving the collectors* valua-
ble field notes, measurements and critical remarks are added by Dr.
^ Birds collected by Dr. W. L. Abbott and Mr. C. B. KIoss in the Andaman
and Nicobar Islands. By Charles W. Richmond, Assistant Curator, Division
of Birds, U. S. National Museum. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XXV, No.
12S8, pp. 287-314, 1902.
236 Rtcent LiUraiurt. xXpt-
Richmond. The generic name Callocalia Gray, 1S40, is shown to be
antedated hy Salamga I. Geoffr., 1837. — J. A, A.
Richmond on Birds from the Coast and Islands of Northwest Suma>
traJ — This collection, consisting of about 450 specimens, representing
about T40 species, was also made by Dr. W. L. Abbott, whose untiring
efforts have done so much in recent years to enrich the collections of
birds and mammals in the U. S. National Museum. The present collec-
tion was made during a five months' cruise along the northwest coast of
Sumatra and adjacent islands. Nineteen of the species Dr. Richmond
has described as new, including 11 in tlie present paper and 8 in a previ-
ously published paper {cf, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XV, 1902. pp.
187-190). The list is briefly annotated from Dr. Abbott's notes, and Dr.
Richmond supplies here and there considerable important technical
comment. — J. A. A.
Fisher on a New Tern from Necker Island.* — As one of the fruits of
the cruise last year of the U. S. Fish Commission steamer ' Albatross ',
engaged in deep-sea dredging around the Hawaiian Islands, Mr. Walter
K. Fisher has described a new tern as Procehierma saxaiaiis^ first obtained
on Necker Island, but also observed at French Frigate Shoals and Bird
Island, of the Leeward Islands, Hawaiian group. It was found breeding
at these islands in considerable numbers, and eggs and young were
obtained. It is nearly related to two other members of the genus found
in southern seas. — J. A. A.
Bonhote's ^ Field Notes on some Bahama Birds.' — In volumes VIII
and IX of the *Avicultural Magazine,' Mr. J. L. Bonhote gives a very
pleasantly written account of his observations on the birds of the
Bahamas. He divides the country into ''four classes'* (i) the thick bush
or * coppet,' (2) the * Pine Barrens,' (3) the open swamps or lagoons, and
(4) the outlying rocks or * Cays,' each of which is treated separately with
its characteristic birds. His paper is thus not a systematic, faunal list,
^ Birds collected by Dr. W. L. Abbott on the Coast and Islands of North-
west Sumatra. By Charles W. Richmond, Assistant Curator, Division of
Birds. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XXVI, No. 1318, pp. 485-542. Feb.,
1903.
*A New Procehterna from the Leeward Islands, Hawaiian Group. By
Walter K. Fisher. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XXVI, No. 1322, pp. 559-
563. Feb., 1903.
^ Field Notes on some Bahama Birds. By J. L. Bonhote, M. A., F. Z. S.,
M. B. O. U. Reprinted and repaged from the * Avicultural Magarine,' Vol
VIII, pp. 278-288, Vol. IX, pp. 19-24, 54-^2, 87-95; 8vo, pp. 55, and 6 half-
tone plates.
but a popular account prepared expressly to fnterest the general reader.
His observations are, however, interesting and valuable to the ornitholo-
gist. All of the principal species are passed in review, some of them
brieflj, while others are noticed at some length. The six half-tone plates
illustrate chiefly the nesting habits of the Noddy and Sooty Terns,
although two are devoted to the Fishhawk. — J. A. A.
Mrs. Wheelock^s ' Nestlings of Forest and Marsh.^ ^ — This pleasantly
written book "claims to be as accurate as careful observation in the field,
with and without a glass, can make it," and has been written from the
author^s own notes "gleaned during several years of study of the nesting
habits of our familiar birds, and some not quite so well known." The
observations here recorded appear to have been made chiefly in the lake
shore region near Chicago, and include studies of the nesting habits of
the Meadowlark, Bluebird, Red-winged Blackbird, Yellow-headed Black-
bird, Robin, Crow, Phcebe, Wood Pewee, Baltimore Oriole, Chickadee,
Marsh Wrens, Sora Rail, Spotted Sandpiper, Killdeer Plover, Bob-white,
Woodpeckers, Swallows, Blue Jay, etc. Mrs. Wheelock is evidently an
enthusiastic and painstaking observer, and has managed to record the
ways and motives of her feathered neighbors with a minuteness that sug-
gests here and there the aid of a helpful imagination. The numerous
half-tone illustrations of nests and nestlings add greatly to the realism of
her graphically related experiences in the field, and combine with the
text to render her book especially attractive as a popular contribution to
the life-histories of some of our commoner birds. — J. A. A.
Proceedings of the Delaware Valley Ornithological Club.^ — The second
number of ' Cassinia * ' consists of the 'Abstract of Proceedings' of the
Club for the year 1902, preceded by the principal papers read before the
Club during the year. The frontispiece is a portrait of Edward Harris,
illustrating a biographical sketch by George Spencer Trotter, of this
friend and patron of science in the early days of American ornithology.
He was especially a friend of Audubon, accompanying him on his tour
through the South Atlantic and Gulf States in 1837, and on his Missouri
River Expedition in 1843. Although he published little, he appears to
have played an important part in the early history of ornithological work
in this country. He was born at Moorestown, N. J., Sept. 6, 1799, where
he died in 1863. He is commemorated in ornithological literature in the
names of several North American birds named in his honor by Audubon,
as Picus karriisif Falco karrist\ Harrises Sparrow, etc.
1 Nestlings | of | Forest and Marsh | By | Irene Grosvenor Wheelock |
[Vignette] With Twelve Full-Page Photogravures and many Illustrations in
the I text from Original Photographs from Nature by | Harry B. Wheelock
I Chicago I A. C. McClurg & Co. | 1902 — i2mo, pp. 257.
'Cassinia: A Bird Annual. Proceedings of the Delaware Valley Orni-
thological Club of Philadelphia, No. VI, 1902. Roy. 8vo, pp. 66. Feb. 1903.
23^2 JRtcsmi UiBratmr^. [jj^
Other papers are * Henslow^s Bunting {Ammcdrawuu kemsUmi) in New
Jersey,' hy Samuel N. Rhoads ; * The Unusual Flight of White Heroos [in
New Jersey] in 1902,' by William B. Evans ; * Notes on the Germantown
Grackle Roost/ by Arthur CopeEmlen; * The Heart of the New Jersey
Pine Barrens,' by Herbert L. Coggins ; * Report on the Spring Migration
of 1902,* by Witmer Stone. Following the * Abstract of Proceedings,'
and *Bird Club Notes,' is a list of the officers and members. — J. A. A.
Publications Received. — Berlepsch, Hans Graf von. (t) Mitteilungen
Uber die von den Gebrtldern G. und O. Garlepp in Bolivia gesammelten
Vogel und Beschreibungen neuer Arten. (Journ. f. Orn., 1901, pp. 81-98.)
(2) Beschreibung zweier neuer Drosselformen aus SQdamerika. (Ornithol.
Monatsb., 1902, pp. 69-71.)
Berlepsch, Graf Hans von, and Jean Stolzmann. (Proc. Zo51. Soc.
London, 1902, pp. 18-60.)
Big^ell, Effie. My Woodland Intimates. 12 mo. The Baker and
Taylor Co., New York. $1.00.
Bonhote, J. L. Field Notes on Some Bahama Birds. (AvicuH. Maf^..
Vols. Vni and IX ; also separate, pp. 33.)
Buterlin, S. A. Limicolae of the Russian Empire. Part I, pp. 1-67,
pll. i-xi, colored. (In Russian.)
Dresser, H. E. The Reproduction of Colours by Photography. (Naturr.
I>ec. II, 1902, with colored plate.)
Dubois, Alphonse. Synopsis Avium, fasc. x-xii, 1902.
Fisher, Walter K. A New Procehterna from the Leeward Islands,
Hawaiian Group. (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XXVI, pp. 559-563.)
Howe, Reginald Heber, Jr. A North American Faunal Index to the
* Ornithologist and Oologist.' (Contr. to N. Am. Orn., Vol. I, pp. 33-38.)
Howe, Reginald Heber, Jr., and Edward Sturtevant. A Supplement to
the Birds of Rhode Island. 8vo, pp. 24. Middletown, R. I., 1903.
Jacobs, J. Warren. The Story of a Martin Colony. Illustrated. 8vo.
pp. 24. Waynesburg, Pa., 1903.
Riley, J. H. Description of a New Qiiail-Dove from the West Indies.
(Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., Vol. XVI, pp. 13, 14. Feb. 21, 1903.)
Richmond, Charles W. (1) Note on Pimtroloxias tHormata (Gould).
(Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash.. Vol. XV, pp. 247, 248, Dec. 16, 1902.) (2) Bird*
collected by Dr. \V. L. Abbott on the Coast and Islands of Northwest
Siiinatpn. (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XXVI, pp. 485-524.)
Sclater, P. L. List of Parrots represented in the Society's Collection
ill January. 1902. with Remarks on Some of the Rarer Species. (Proc.
Zool. Soc. Loiul., 190J, pp. 166-171, pll. xviii, xix.)
Seth-Smith. D. Parrakeets, IxMiig a Practical Handbook to tho>e
SjH'cies kept in Captivity. Parts 1-3, 1902. Svo, with colored platc*«.
R. IL Porter, London. Price 6s net per part.
Shufeldt, R. W. The Classification of Certain Groups of Birds. (Am.
Nat., Vol. XXXVII, Jan., 1903, pp. 33-64.)
^^i»^] Rtic^ni IMeraiure. Z33
Strong, R. M. A Case of Abnormal Plumage. (Biolog. Bull., Vol. Ill,
Nov., 1902, pp. 389-294.)
Trowbridge, C. C. The Relation of Wind to Bird Migration. (Am.
Nat., Vol. XXXVI, pp. 735-753.)
Weed, Clarence M. A Partial Bibliography of the Economic Relations
of North American Birds. (Bull. No. 5, New Hampshire Agric. Experi-
ment Station, 1902.
Wheelock, Mrs. Irene Grosvenor. Nestlings of Forest and Marsh.
A. C. McClurg & Co., Chicago.
American Ornithology, III, Nos. 1-3, Jan.-March, 1903.
Aimals of Scottish Natural History, No. 45, Jan , 1903.
Avicultural Magazine, New Series, I, Nos. 1-5, Dec. 1902-March, 1903.
Bird-Lore, V, No. i, Jan., 1903.
Birds and Nature, XllI, Nos. 1-3, Jan.-March, 1903.
BuUetin Brit. Orn. Club, XIII, Nos. XCIII-XCV, Dec-March, 1903.
Cassinia, Proc. Delaware Valley Orn. Club, No. VI, 1902.
Condor, The, V, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., 1903.
Emu, The, II, Part 3, Jan., 1903.
Forest and Stream, LX, Nos. 1-12, 1903.
Journal Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., XX, No. 3, Nov. 25, 1902.
Journal Maine Ornith. Soc, V, No. i, Jan., 1903.
Knowledge, XXVI, Nos. 207-209, Jan.-March, 1903.
Naturalist, The, A Month, Journ. Nat. Hist, for North of England,
Nos. 552-554, Jan.-March, 1903.
Omithologische Monatsberichte, XI, Nos. 1-3, Jan.-March, 1903.
Omithologische MonatsKchrift, Nos. 11, 12, Nov. -Dec, 1902.
Ottawa Naturalist, XVI, Nos. 10, 12, Jan.-March, 1903.
Our Animal Friends, XXX, Nos. 5-7, Jan.-March, 1903.
Proceedings California Acad. Sci., Zool., Ill, Nos. 5 and 6, Jan. and
Feb., 1903.
Proceedings and Transactions Nova Scotia Institute of Science, X,
Part 3, 1902.
Warbler, The, I, No. i, Jan.-Feb., 1903.
Zoologist, The, (4), VII, Nos. 73-74, Jan.-March, 1903.
234 Corresfomdemce, \jSat.
CORRESPONDENCE.
Some Suggestions.
Editors of * The Auk ^ : —
Dear Sirs : — I take this occasion to voice the feelings of man/
amateur ornithologists who are members of the A. O. U. We all hare the
keenest sympathy for the success of the cause for which *The Auk'
stands as the organ of the A. O. U.» and we fully realize that the highest
advancement of American ornithology can be accomplished only through
and by professional men, and that *The Auk* must and should be their
favored organ.
But we further believe that the continued success of *■ The Auk * and
Union depends upon the moral and financial support which they receive
from the amateur members of the A. O. U. In many, maybe in most
instances, this support must be dependent upon the contents of ' The
Auk.' Many of the readers of * The Auk ' — and I am one of them — are
only secondarily interested in technical and local faunal articles. Their
leisure opportunities, and perhaps their inclinations, are sufficient to grasp
only the general features of systematic and faunal ornithology. On the
other hand they are intensely interested in general and field ornithology,
and peruse and study those matters which relate to the habits and life
histories of the feathered kind with the keenest enjoyment. Such reading
appeals to their sympathy and feelings, enlivens and deeper s their
interest, and may lead them on to the study of scientific ornithology,
which is in most instances regarded at first as dry and uninteresting.
I feel assured that if ^ The Auk * coniained more articles of the nature
of Bent's late article on North Dakota Anatidae, or Peabody*8 on Le
Conte's Sparrow — articles interesting to the student as well as to the
professional — the membership of the A. O. U. would be measurably
increased, the funds available for publishing * The Auk* would be
greater, and its value both to the scientist and to the amateur would be
enhanced.
Very truly yours,
J. C. Knox,
Jan. 17, 1903. Jackson^ Minm,
[The above letter is in line with others. received from time to time by
the Editors of * The Auk,* offering suggestions for its improvement from
the standpoint of the lay reader. But Mr. Knox's letter is exceptional in
its courteous tone, and in the rensonablcsness of its suggestions. That
the matter may be better understood, it seems well to present in this con-
nection a few words of editorial comment.
•The Auk' is, first of all, the organ of the American Ornithologi*t*8
Union, which is primarily an association of professional ornithologists, or
/•^^*] Correspondence, 235
advanced workers in orn{thologv« whose purpose of organization wan to
promote community of interest, and cooperation among the leaders of the
science, and to secure a medium of intercommunication, and for the puhli-
cation of the results of their investigations. Secondarily, the purpoKc of
the Union was to secure the affiliation of all American hird students. — to
bring the amateurs into touch with the professionals, in the hope that
their interest in hird stud^ would thereby be fostered and their cftortK be
in a measure favorably guided hy being brought into contact with the
more experienced workers. For this reason the lay clement was invited
to accept enrollment in the Union, to attend its annual congrcsKes, to
present papers and otherwise participate in the scientific proceedings, and
especially to form acquaintances and associations that would prove
pleasant and helpful. Such has been, we believe, to as large an extent ai»
could be reasonably expected, the outcome of the founding of the Union.
Its meml>ership is. however, so widely scattered that, although the con-
gresses are held alternately in the larger eastern cities, the social feature
of the organization is necessarily somewhat limited.
In regard to *The Auk,* its function is, first of all, that of a medium of
publication for the working ornithologists, and holds the position of the
* Proceedings * or 'Annals' of a scientific society. It pays nothing for
the articles contributed to its pages, and rarely solicits contributions.
More matter is offered for publication than can be accepted, and the
editorial function as to choice of material is limited to excluding what
seems the least desirable. It thus differs notably from the ordinary
literary magazine, which pays for its contributinuK and whose editorial
management is supposed to cater to the public needs or tasle.
Mr. Knox refers to certain papers as being especially desirable and
stimulating to the clientele for whom he assumes to speak. The editors
of 'The Auk* never reject articles of this character; they arc only too
glad to receive this class of papers. The rejected matter is almost wholly
of the class to which Mr. Knox specifically objects. The editors of 'The
Auk* cannot publish for the entertainment of its readers what does not
come to their hands. Technical papers, containing the result.<« of special
research by members of the Union, should, in the nature of the case, be
promptly accepted; faunal papers, which are a real contribution to
knowledge, are not lightly to ht passed by ; but if they relate to com>
paratively well known regions, or contain little that is new, they are
rated at once as unavailable. Finally, it is the aim of the editorial staff
of *The Auk * to cater especially to the popular side of ornithology, to
furnish to the amateur readers papers that they will enjoy and find
profitable. The technical side will always take care of itself ; the demand
for space for such contributions is always greater than the supply, and it
is papers of this character that get the cold shoulder and not those of a
popular character, provided of course that they contain something worthy
ol record. — Eds.]
236 Corr€sfond€mc€, f
AriK
Vtcnafiular NamM of BMa.
Editors of *Thr Auk*.
Dear Sirs: — The subject of vernacular oames d birda ia iK>t of
supreme importance in ornithology^ but, since it has been opeaad* I
hope I may be allowed to make a little suggestion. First let me sajr,
though I am well aware that Dr. Allen's views need no endorsement fron
me, that I am in entire accord with them in the matter of hrphenating,
and this in spite of a tendency toward purism which should perhaps lead
me to stand by the dictionaries and Dr. Doran. It has always seemed to
nie that the words * song,' * tree,' ' swamp,' etc, as used in connectioo
with the names of sparrows are as truly adjectival in sense as if they
were actual adjectives instead of nouns, and I can see no good reason why
the combinations should be differentiated in form from such names as
* chipping sparrow' and 'white-throated sparrow.' The case of 'quail-
dove ' is different, of course, as are those of * water-thrush ' and * meadow-
lark.' Personally I should have preferred * meadow-lark,' ' night-hawk,
etc., reserving the single-word form for the more familiar compounds of
tlie word ^ bird,' but I cheerfully follow the A. O. U. in vernacular as well
as in the scientific names. (There is just one bit of sentimentalism in
the list, which I cannot countenance : I refuse to call a snow bunting a
^ snowtiake.' I also prefer, in conversation, to speak of white-bellied
instead 'white-breasted' nuthatches.)
But, to come to the point of this communication, it seems to me that
a mucli more serious difficulty than that of the hyphens is the lack of
qualifying or what I may call 'specific* and 'subspecific' adjectives for
the names of certain birds like the chickadee, the horned lark, the red-
poll, and the towhee. Why should we not have full vernacular names for
Parus atricupilius, Oiocoris alpestris^ Acantkis linaria^ PipUo trytkrofk-
thalmuss etc., which will tell exactly what species and subspecies is
referred to in any given case without the help of the scientific name?
Wc should not always have to use the complete name, of course, but it
would be convenient to have one to use when needed and one that is
sanctioned by the Union. I hope that this matter may be considered bjr
the Committee on Nomenclature when the next edition of the Check-List
is prepared.
Francis H. Allen.
lioston^ .Muss.
A Rare Work on American Ornithology.
Kditors of * Thk Auk ' : —
Dntr Sirs: — Captain Thomas Brown's folio 'Illustrations of the
American Ornitholoi^y of WiUon and Bonaparte* is such a scarce book
that you may deem it worthy of a notice in your pages. By a careful
^'^jj*] Correspondence, '237
search 1 have been able to trace onl^ three copies of it. One of these is
in the library of the Zoological Societjr of London, another in the posses-
sion of Professor Alfred Newton, the third (a very imperfect copy) in a
private library in Tarrytown, N. Y. The latter is the one that was twice
sold at auction in New York City, Nov. 23, 1896, and Feb. 23, 1897.
In 183 1 the first European edition of Wilson and Bonaparte^s ^American
Ornithology * was published in Edinburgh, without plates, forming four
volumes of Constable's * Miscellany ^ and edited by Professor Jameson.
That the 'Illustrations' of Capt. Brown were originally intended to
accompany the text of the Constable * Miscellany' edition is clearly shown
by contemporary notices. In a notice of Jameson's edition in the * Edin-
burgh New Philosophical Journal' (Jameson's), July-Sept., 1831, p. 409,
we read : ''As a proof of the interest the work [ Jameson^s edition] is
exciting, we may add, that the plates of the original works are re-engrav-
ing and publishing. Three editions are now in progress, one in folio,
another in royal octavo, a third the size of the Edinburgh [Jameson's]
edition of Wilson and Bonaparte, and as stated in the advertisement^
intended to bind up with that work." In an advertisement dated April,
183 1, issued with some copies of the first volume of Jameson's Wilson &
Bonaparte, as well as in a critical notice of the first part of Capt. Brown^s
'Illustrations' which appeared in the 'London Literary Gazette' for
October 8, 1831, the ' Illustrations' are spoken of as forming a companion
to the letter-press of Jameson's edition of Wilson & Bonaparte. From
the Constable advertisement we further learn that the first part of the
'Illustrations' was published in April, 1831, and consisted of five plates;
pricCf medium folio, colored, 15 s. ; plain, 10 s. ; a few in elephant folio,
colored, one guinea. "To be completed in ten parts, each containing ....
five plates." The work finally exceeded by much the limits at first
assigned to it, the plates amounting to 124 at their completion in 1835,
when an engraved title-page was issued, which I transcribe from the
copy in the library of the Zoological Society:
"Illustrations | of the | American Ornithology | of | Alexander Wilson
I and I Charles Lucian Bonaparte | Prince of Musignano | With the addi-
tion of I Numerous recently discovered Species | and Representations of |
The Whole Sylva | of | North America. | By | Captain Thomas Brown.
I FLS. MWS. MKS. MPS. | Late President of the Royal Physical Society.
I &c. &c. &c. I Edinburgh. | Frazer & Co. 54 North Bridge | William
Curry, Junr. & Co. Dublin | & Smith, Elder & Co. 65 Cornhill | London.
I MDCCCXXXV. I Designed & engraved by James Turvey." Folio.
Collation : Engraved title-leaf, engraved dedication-leaf, pp. i-lii [Sys-
tematic Index], pll. col. I-CXXIV. Plate XCVI. is erroneously numbered
CVI. (rectified in the Index) and 68 of the plates have numbers gummed
on after printing (these also are properly allocated in the Index).
The Tarrytown copy, which I have also had the privilege of seeing,.
although very defective (lacking 37 plates, title-page, dedication and
index), is interesting inasmuch as it retains one of the original brown
238
Corre$fondeMC€. \k£
LApr.
paper wrappers, probably belonging to Part I. The title as printed on
this wrapper differs from the definitive engraved title, and reads as
follows:
''Illustrations | of the | American Ornithology | of | Alexander Wil-
son, I and Charles Lucian Bonaparte ; | with the addition of numerous
recently discovered species. | And including | representations of the prin-
cipal insects, | forest trees, and fruits of America. | Drawn, engraved, and
coloured | under the superintendence of | Captain Thomas Brown, F. L. S.
M. W. S. &c. I President of the Royal Physical Society. | Edinburgh : |
published by Henry Constable; | Hurst, Chance, & Co. and Moon, Boys, &
Graves, London; | John Cumming, Dublin. | 1831."
Brown's book is not in any true sense an edition of Wilson and Bona-
parte. It is composed partly of original figures, but in a large measure
it is compiled from the works of Wilson, Bonaparte, Audubon, Richard-
son and Swainson, and Jardine and Selby. As specimens of the
engraver's art these plates exemplify the best work of the then leading
engravers of Edinburgh, such as W. H. Lizars (who engrared Selby's
plates and the earliest of Audubon's), E. Mitchell, R. Scott, Jas. Johnstone,
John Miller, Samuel Milne, etc. In copying, however, the artist often
lost the spirit of the originals, and in many of the new figures, which
must of necessity have been drawn from stuffed birds, ignorance of the
life attitudes of the subjects is often painfully apparent. In one of the
early plates the perching of an Arctic Owl on a Magnolia tree was proba-
bly a bit of unconscious humor on the part of the artist who designed the
plate.
In 1834, a year before the completion of this series of plates, Capt.
Brown published the Game Bird plates as a separate work, with a title-
page engraved specially for it by Turvey, which reads as follows:
"Illustrations | of the | Game Birds | of | North America | Chiefly the
size of Nature | By | Captain Thomas Brown | F. L. S. M. W. S.
M. K. S., M. P. S. I Late President of the Royal Physical Society, | &c.
&c. ^:c. I Edinburgh | Frazcr & Co. 54 North Bridge ; | Wni. Curry, Junr.
& Co. Dublin ; | John Smith & Son Glasgow ; | & Smith Elder & Co. 65
Cornhill. | London | MDCCCXXXIV. Designed 4nd engraved by James
Turvey." 16 pll. col., folio (2\\X i(>\ in.).
I found a copy of this book, of which I can find no mention in anv
bibliojrraphy or library- or sale-catalogue, in a book-shop in Birmingham
last year. It consists, as I have said, of the Game Bird plates of the
larjt^er work, sixteen plates, unnumbered. l)eing plates 69-83 and 102, of
the larjjer work. In these plates the birds only are colored, whereaK in
the copies of the larger work that I have seen, the accessories (plants
insects, and backgrounds) are colored also. This set of sixteen plates
includes figures of several of our western birds which are interesting as
being among the earliest published portraits of those species. From the
following account of the Game Bird plates one can form some notion of
the character of the more extended work; ex pede HercuUm :
Vol. XX
1903
J Corresfomdence, ^39
PI. I. [LXXV. of the larger work]. "Tctrao cupido " [Tympanuchus
americanus (Reich.)]. Fig. i, ^, after Wilson; Fig. 2, $, original.
The habitat is given, " State of New TorkV Since Wilson's figure was
made from a Kentucky specimen, it may be that the female (Fig. 2) was
drawn from a Long Island Heath Hen (T. cupido), which would be very
interesting, if true. I believe De Kay*s rude figure (Birds of New York,
PI. 77, fig. 175) is the only picture of a Heath Hen not from Martha*s
Vineyard, besides the original figure of Catesby.
PI. II. [LXXIV.] Fig. I, "Tetrao umbellus " [Bonasa umbellus (Linn.)],
i, after Wilson ; Fig. 2, "Tetrao phasianellus " [Pedioecetes p. columbi-
anu« (Ord)], $ , after Bonaparte.
PI. III. [LXXVU.]. "Tetrao canadensis." [Fig. i, ,J, Canachites frank-
linii (Dougl.); Fig. 2, $, Canachites canadensis (Linn.)]. Both after
Bonaparte.
PI. IV. [LXXVIIL]. "Tetrao franklinii" [Canachites franklinii
(Dougl.)]. Fig. I, ^, perhaps altered from Rich. & Swains., F. B. A., PI.
61 ; Fig. 2, 9 > original.
PI. V. [LXXVI.]. "Tetrao obscurus" [Dendragapus obscurus (Say)].
Fig. I, ^, orig.; Fig. 2, $ , after Bonaparte.
PI. VI. [LXXIX.]. "Tetrao richardsonii " [Dendragapus obscurus rich-
ardsonii (Dougl.)]. Fig. i, i ; Fig. 2, $. Original. A fine plate
designed by Jos. B. Kidd, a young landscape artist of Edinburgh, a
friend of Audubon. Engraved by R. Scott.
PI. VII. [LXXX.]. "Tetrao urophasianus " [Centrocercus urophasia-
nus (Bonap.)]. Fig. i, ^, orig.; Fig. 2, $, after Bonaparte.
PL VIII. [LXXXI.]. "Lagopus saliceti " [Lagopus lagopus (Linn.)].
P*fir- *f it spring plumage; Fig. 2, ^, summer plumage; Fig. 3, ?, win-
ter plumage. Original.
PI. IX. [LXXXII.]. Fig. I, Lagopus leucurus Sw. & Rich., adapted
from Sw. & Rich., F. B. A., PI. 63; Fig. 2, Lagopus rupestris (Gmel.),
orig.
PI. X. [LXXXIII.]. "Lagopus mutus " [Lagopus rupestris (Gmel.)]-
Fig- i» Si winter; Fig. 2, 9, summer. "Inhabits Winter Island."
Original.
PI. XL [LXIX.]. "Perdix virginiana" [Colinus virginianus (Linn.)].
Fig. I, S% after Wilson ; Fig. 2, ?, orig.
PI. XIL [LXXII.]. Fig. I, "Ortyx capistrata " [Odontophorus capueira
(Spix)], "drawn by Captain Brown," evidently from the type specimen
of Ortyx capistratus Jard. & Selby (= Odontophorus capueira), in the
collection of Sir Wm. Jardine, purchased by him from a collection of skins
sold in Edinburgh (Jardine & Selby. 111. Orn., I. PI. 38, 1828) ; Fig. 2,
" Ortyx neoxen us " [young ^, or 9, of Eupsychortyx cristatus (Linn.),
outline seemingly copied from the little wood-cut in Bennett's • Gardens
and Menagerie of the Zoological Society," Vol. II, p. 311, 1831, though
the details must have been filled in from a specimen, I should suppose.
Ortyx neoxenus Vigors, the types of which were in the gardens of the
2A0 Carrespamdemce, \_km
Zoological Society of London, were identified bjr Gould as Empsyckortyn
crista tus (Linn.).
PI. XIIL [LXX.]. Fig. I, "Ortyx macroura " [ Dcndrortyx macrurut
(Jard. & Selby)], a representation of the tjpe in coll. Jardine (Jardine ft
Selby, 111. Orn., L PI. 49, 1828), probably adapted from the plate in fardine
& Selby; Fig. 2, "Ortyx montezumse" [Cyrtonyx montezumK (Vig.)],
after Jardine & Selby, Vol. III. PI. 126, 1833. but altered.
PI. XIV. [LXXL]. Fig. I, *'Ortyx douglasii " [Lophortyx elegans
(Less.)]; Fig. 2, "Ortyx californica" [Lophortyx califomicus (Shaw)],
S ; Fig. 3, do., ? . Original.
PI. XV. [LXXIII.]. "Ortyx picta" [Oreortyx pictus plumifer Gould)].
Fig. I, i ; Fig. 2, ? [?]. Original. The earliest pictorial representation
of the species, so far as I know, but unfortunately a wretched performance.
The so-called female, particularly, looks as if it might have been con-
structed from Douglases remarkable description of the female of
Ortyx pictus,
PI. XVI. [CII.]' Fig. I, "Scolopax noveboracensis"[Macrorhamphu»
griseus (Gmel.)] ; Fig. 2, "Scolopax wilsonii" [Gallinago delicaU Ord];
Fig. 3, "Scolopax minor" [Philohela minor (Gmel.)]. All after Wilson.
That a very small edition of Brown*8 work was published is evinced by
its excessive rarity at the present time. The book was not of a character
to meet any real want, and moreover it entered into competition with
the great work of Audubon's, then publishing. An entry in Audubon's
journal in October, 1830, goes far toward explaining the failure of Capt.
Brown's undertaking, and at the same time brings out in bright relief the
indefatigable industry and colossal self-confidence of Audubon :
"A few days after I began writing on the Biography, it was known in
Edinburgli that I had arrived, and Professors Jameson, Graham, and others
whom I had known, called on me; and I found at the * fourteenth hour,*
that no less than three editions of ' Wilson's Ornithology * were about to
be published, one by Jameson, one by Sir W. Jardine, and another by a
Mr. Brown. Most persons would probably have been discouraged by
this inforniatioii, but it only had a good effect on me, because since I
have been in England 1 have studied the character of Englishmen as
carefully as I studied the birds in America. And I know full well, that
in England novelty is always in demand, and that if a thing is well
known it will not receive much support. Wilson has had his day,
thoui^ht I to myself, and now is my time. I will write, and 1 will hope
to be read ; and not only so, but I will push my publication with such
unremitting vigour, that my book shall con^e before the public before
Wilson's can be got out.
"Writing now became the order of the day. I sat at it as soon as I
awoke in the morning, and continued the whole long day. and so full
was my mind of birds and their habits, that in my sleep I continually
dreamed of birds. I found Mr. McGillivray equally industrious, for
although he did not rise so early in the morning as I did, he wrote much
^*W^] Correspondence, 24 1
later at night. . . . ; and so the manuscripts went on increasing in bulk,
like the rising of a stream after iibundant rains, and before three months
had passed the first volume was finished. . . .
^^Marck 13, 1831. Mjr book is now on the eve. of being presented to the
world. The printing will be completed in a few da^s."^
What became of the rojal octavo plates and of the 18^ series intended to
bind up with the little Jameson edition of Wilson and Bonaparte, both of
which were announced in the 'Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal ' for
1831, as cited above? I think it probable that the former were appropri-
ated by Sir William Jardine, that they were in fact the plates which
adorn his octavo edition of Wilson and Bonaparte, which appeared in
1832. Otherwise they are unaccounted for. If, too, one examines even
an untrimmed copy of Jardine^s original issue, he will perceive that the
plates are cut down nearly to the quick, indeed quite to the plate mark ;
as if originally designed for a royal octavo atlas and doomed by an after-
thought to be the accompaniment of a sma il ociavo text.
The fate of the 18^ plates appears to have been even more disastrous
than that of the folio series edited by Capt. Brown. After diligent
enquiry I find but two indications of the existence of any of these plates
at the present time. Some years ago Professor Newton furnished Dr.
Coues with an account of the first part of a set of little plates illustrating
Wilson and Bonaparte*s Ornithology, issued by the publishers of
Jameson^s edition and uniform in size with that edition. The title as
given by Coues (* Birds Col. Valley,^ p. 6co) was as follows:
"American Ornithology. | Illustrations | of | American Ornithology; |
reduced from the | original work of Alexander Wilson. | London : | pub-
lished by William Spooner, 259, Regent Street, | Oxford Street; | Hurst,
Chance, and Co., 65 St. Paul's Church-Yard; | and Constable and Co.,
Edinburgh. | [No date.] i6mo? i8mo? (say 4X6 inches). No. i, con-
taining 8 plates."
Finally, Mr. Witmer Stone has a copy of Jameson's edition of Wilson
and Bonaparte which contains nineteen colored plates (3! X 5I in.)
scattered through the first two of the four volumes. That these plates
were made for the book in which they are found is proved by the fact
that many of them bear the appropriate page-references to the text of
that edition. I have little doubt that they represent a fuller set of the
series Professor Newton saw, and that they belong to the small 18^
edition announced in the * New Edinburgh Philosophical Journal ' in 183 1.
Yours very truly,
Walter Faxon,
Feb. 17, 1903. Cambridge, Mass.
'The Life and Adventures of John James Audubon, the Naturalist. Edited,
from materials supplied by his Widow, by Robert Buchanan. London, 1868.
Pp. 17«» 173-
242
Notes and Nrws,
[Aak
Apr.
NOTES AND NEWS.
Thomas McIlwraith, a Fellow and one of the Founders of the Amer-
ican Ornithologist's Union, died at his home in Hamilton, Ontario, on
January 31, 1903, in his 79th year. He was born in Newton, Ayr, Scot-
land, 25th of December, 1824, and in 1853 settled in Hamilton, Ontario,
where he became a prominent and successful business man, retiring from
active business about ten years ago. From early boyhood he was an
ardent lover of nature and later became especially interested in birds.
As early as i860 he had become a local authority on the birds occurring
about Hamilton, notices of which he published in the * Canadian Natu-
ralist' in t86o and 1861 (Vol. V, pp. 387-396, and Vol. VI, pp. 6-18, 129-
198).
In x866 appeared his carefully annotated * List of Birds obaenred near
Hamilton, Canada West* (Proc. Essex Institute, V, 1886, pp. 79-96),
numbering 241 species. This brought him prominently to tJie notice of
the leading American ornithologists, with a number of whom he main-
tained for many years a y^ry active correspondence. In 1886 appeared
his * The Birds of Ontario, being a list of Birds observed in the Provinoe
of Ontario, with an Account of their Habits, Distribution, Nests, Eggs,
etc.,* an octavo volume of about 300 pages. A second edition, entirely
rewritten and greatly enlarged, including descriptions of the species, was
published in 1894, forming an excellent and greatly appreciated manual
of the Birds of Ontario.
In 1883 Mr. McIlwraith was invited to the meeting of the leading Amer
ican ornithologists, held in New York City, which resulted in the founding
of the American Ornithologist's Union. He was made a member of the
Committee on Bird Migration, and the work of the District of Ontario
was assigned to him for supervision. In 1889 he was elected a member
of the Council, which office he held for one year. He had gathered a
large collection of Canadian and British birds, many of which he liad
mounted. He was warmly esteemed in the community In which he lived,
and left a wide circle of friends among the members of the A. O. U., by
whom he has long been held in high respect.
John Nathaniel Clark, a Member of the American Ornithologists*
Union, died at his home in Say brook, Conn., Jan. 13, 1903, at the age of
72 years. He was born in Saybrook Jan. 14, 1831, and was a descendant
of John Clark of England, who settled at Saybrook Point in 1636. He
was widely known and greatly respected, and had long taken a prominent
part in the affairs of his native town, having for sixteen years held the
office of probate judge, besides filling other public offices with credit and
^*i^] ^9^^ '^^ News. 243
fidelitjf. He was educated in the public schools of hit native town, and
during hit earlier life taught tchool for twenty jeart in Wettbrook and
neighboring townt.
From earlj life he was enthutiastically interested in birds, and for
manjr years was an authority on the birds of southern Connecticut. He
had gathered a nearly complete collection of the birds, and their nests
and eggs, of his region, and from time to time for many years contributed
interesting notes of his discoveries to various natural history journals,
notably to *• The Auk,^ and its predecessor, the * Bulletin of the Nuttall
Ornithological Club.' He was the first to make known the nest and eggs
of the Little Black Rail, two nests of which were discovered by him at
Saybrook, Conn., respectively in 1876 and 1884.
Mr. Clark was a regular attendant at the annual Congress of the
American Ornithologists' Union, participating in its proceedings, and
where his presence was always welcomed as a pleasant feature of the
occasion. He was absent from the last Congress, but contributed, as
usual, to the program of the meeting. His last paper, entitled *The
Domestic Affairs of Bob-white,* is published in the present number of
*The Auk * (pp. 161-164). He had many warm friends among the older
members of the A. O. U., by whom his memory will be long cherished,
not less for his amiable personality than as an ardent field student of
birds.
Edward Stanley Watsrs, an Associate of the American Ornitholo-
gists' Union since 1894, died at his home in Holyoke, Mass., December
27, 1903, at the age of 71 years. He was born March 22, 1831, at Salem,
Mass., where his family had resided for several generations, and where
his father was judge of the Salem police court. After a preparatory
course at the Salem Academy he entered Harvard University, but ill
health prevented his graduation. He became, however, a civil engineer,
and at the outbreak of the civil war he joined the Engineer Corps, and
was soon assigned to the staff of General Burnside, and later to that of
General Meade. Although engaged throughout the remainder of his life
in engrossing business affairs, he was greatly interested in natural
history, especially in botany and geology, and evidently in ornithology,
although he published little if anything relating to these sciences. He
was an expert hydraulic engineer, and the construction of the big dam at
Holyoke, across the Connecticut River, and one of the largest in the
country, is a monument to his engineering skill. At the time of his
death, and for many years previously, he was the treasurer and agent of
the Holyoke Water Power Company. He was recognized as a man of
high moral tone, but is said to have never mingled much in social life or
in politics, belonging to but one organization, the Holyoke Horticultural
Club. He is survived by two brothers, one of whom is Henry Fitzgilbert
Waters, of Melrose, Mass., the well-known genealogist.
244 Noi€s and Newt. \j$.
Thb Michigan Ornithological Club wm organized in Detroit,
Feb. 13, 1903, to succeed an earlier nimilar organiiation whidi disbanded
about three years ago. The officers elected are : President, A. B. Corert,
Ann Arbor ; Vice-President, Dr. Philip E. Moodj, Detroit ; SecretarT-
Treasurer, Bradshaw H. Swales, Detroit. A bird protection Committee
was established, consisting of Edward Arnold, Chairihan, Battle Creek ;
James B. Purdy, Plymouth ; and Prof. Walter B. Barrows, Agricultural
College; to act in conjunction with William Dutcher, Chairman of the
American Ornithologists' Union Bird Protection Committee. The Club
will publish a journal to be called the * Bulletin of the Michigan Ornith<^
logical Club,' with A. W. Blain, Jr., as editor. It will be an illustrated
quarterly, devoted to the ornithology of the Great Lakes Region. One
of the purposes of the Club will be to secure more effective legal protec-
tion for the birds of Michigan. The Club has already about fifty mem-
bers, scattered throughout this and the adjoining States. Monthly
meetings will be held at Detroit, and an annual meeting at the same time
and place as the annual meeting of the Michigan Academy of Sciences.
The second annual meeting of the Vermont Bird Club was held in
the Williams Science Hall in Burlington, January 16 and 17. Papers were
read by Mrs. E. B. Davenport on * Birds of Mount Mansfield obser^-ed
between June 6 and July 31, 1902,' mentioning 75 species ; by Carleton D.
Howe, * Some suggestions to the Vermont Bird Club'; by G. II. Roftf,
* Nesting of the Golden-crowned Kinglet,* an account of ten nests found
in Rutland County; by Miss M. M. Tuttle, 'Nesting of the Prairie
Horned Lark,' in Poultney, in March, 1902. Mrs. Davenport gave an
account of the last meeting of the A. O. U. ; Mr. Ross reported the
taking of a Barn Owl in Danby ; Prof. V^otey reported the Red Phalarope
from Greenboro, and Mrs. Horton an albino Cuckoo from Brattleboro.
Twenty new members were added, increasing the membership to nearly
one hundred. The following officers were elected for the ensuing year:
President, Prof. G. H. Perkins, Burlington; Vice-President, C. D. Howe.
Essex Junction ; Secretary and Treasurer, G. H. Ross, Rutland. Steps
are to be taken to secure an accurate list of the birds known to occur
in the State, with the object of publication.
We regret to learn from the publishers (Dana Estes and Company,
Boston) that the publication of the new edition of Dr. Coues*s * Key to
North American Birds,' announced to appear in the spring of 1903 (see
Auk, XX, p. 97), is unavoidably deferred till the coming fall.
•TiiK Warbler' is the title of a new ornithological magazine, of which
the initial number (Vol. I. No. i) has just appeared. It is of royal octavo
size, and will be published bi-monthly, by the Mayflower Publishing
Company (John Lewis Childs. president), at Floral Park, N. Y., under the
editorship of the Rev- H. C. Munson. ("Subscription price, 30 cents for 3
^ wf^J ^^^^^ ^^^ News. 245
jrears.") *The Warbler* was formerly a department of the popular jour-
nal of floriculture *The Mayflower *. It will be devoted "to the study and
protection of North American wild birds, and to promoting a better appre-
ciation of them." The present number well sustains the above-quoted
editorial promise. Among the popular articles on birds is the beginning
of a series of papers on 'Birds of Prey*, illustrated with half-tones of
groups of specimens in Mr. Childs's \try large collection of mounted
North American birds at Floral Park, to which, we learn from *The
Warbler,* he has just added a fine specimen of the Labrador Duck, pur-
chased of the Free Public Museum of Liverpool, England, for $1000.
At the last meeting of the American Ornithologists* Union, held in
Washington, Nov. 17-20, 1902, the question of holding the next meeting
of the Union in California was considered. For various reasons an
attempt to hold the regular annual congress so far from the geographical
center of the membership seemed impracticable, and the proposition
finally took the form of a proposed special session, for the presentation
of scientific papers, to be held in California during the spring or early
summer of 1903. The matter was finally referred to a committee, with
power to make all the necessary arrangements for such a meeting, pro-
vided the proposition proved feasible. This committee consists of Dr.
C. Hart Merriam, Dr. T. S. Palmer, and Mr. John H. Sage. Late in Feb-
ruary the Committee issued a circular of information, stating that "the
railroads are not only willing to grant very favorable rates, but that most
satisfactory arrangements may be made with respect to stop-over privi-
leges." It also gave the following itinerary for the outward trip :
"The plan is to leave Chicago May 3, to reach San Francisco on or
about May 13, and to hold the special meeting May 15-16 in conjunction
with the California members of the A. O. U. and the members of the
Cooper Ornithological Club. The stop-overs now planned are at Albu-
querque and Santa F^, New Mexico, the Fossil Forest on the Desert of the
Little Colorado, the Grand Cafion in Arizona, and San Bernardino, River-
side, Pasadena, and Los Angeles in southern California. This will
enable the party to visit points of greatest historic, ethnologic, and
scenic interest in Arizona and New Mexico, including the old Mexican
town of Santa F6 and at least one of the picturesque Indian pueblos
where the stone and adobe dwellings and picturesque costumes of the
people are in strange contrast with those of the East. The feature of the
trip will be the stop At the Grand Cafion of the Colorado in northern
Arizona, where time will be given for a descent into the most sublime and
wonderful chasm known in the whole world.
"In southern California the route traverses the Mohave Desert with its
fringing belt of tree yuccas, and then descends through 'Cajon Pass to San
Bernardino, whence a side trip is planned to the celebrated orange groves
at Riverside. At Pasadena an opportunity will be given to ascend Mt.
Lowe in the Sierra Madre, and at Los Angeles to visit the coast at Santa
Monica or Redondo." A trip to the Yosemite is also planned.
246 Nott and News, f^
The cost of a round-trip ticket will be a tingle fare from the starting
point to Chicago, plus $5aoo; to which should be added $6.50 for the
round trip to the Grand Cation, making a total of $74.50 for the round-
trip ticket from New York.
The tickets for the round trip are good from May 2 to Julv 15, and the
return trip may be made over any route the holder may be pleased to
select, with an additional charge of $11.50 if the return is made by way
of Portland or Seattle, over either of the northern roads. The plan is to
go as a single party, then disband and return as the various members may
elect, as regards date and route. With the unrestricted 8to|>-over privi-
leges granted by the railroads, members have the opportunity of devoting
most of the ten weeks available for the trip to sight-seeing or in ornitho-
logical field work at such points as they desire especially to select.
The number of applications for enrollment for the trip thus far received
seems to render it certain that the plan of holding a special spring meet-
ing in California is an assured success. Detailed information regarding
the trip may be obtained from Mr. John A. Sage, Portland, Conn^ to
whom all communications should be addressed.
Mr. William Dutcher, in his annual report as Chairman of the A.
O. U. Committee for the Protection of North American Birds, published
in the last number of *• The Auk,' showed (see map, pL IIP) tiiat 16 States
had adopted the A. O. U. 'model law,' and 15 others were enumerated
which were without such a law, and respecting which the Committee
"proposed to make an active effort" to obtain its enactment during the
then approaching legislative season. It is a subject of congratulation to
all bird lovers that prior to March 20 the A. O. U. model law had been
adopted by the legislatures of North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, and
Washington, and had been favorably reported, or passed through one
branch, in the legislatures of Colorado, Michigan, Missouri, Texas, and
Virginia. Mr. Dutcher is to be especially congratulated on the excellent
results thus far accomplished during the present year, since much of this
success is due to his unremitting efforts in this good cause.
The American Museum of Natural History in New York city
began some fifteen years ago to place on exhibition a series of bird
groups illustrating the bird life of eastern North America, since which
time between 50 and 60 groups have been placed in its exhibition halU.
These include a wide range of type<«, illustrating most of the families of
1 Unfortunately in ' making up * the January issue the two maps acconpan-
ing Mr. Ducher*s report were transposed as to position and number; to accord
with the references in the text Plate III should be numbered Plate IV, and
Plate IV should be plate III, and their location in the text correspondingly
changed. The titles at the bottom of the plates are, however, correct, so
that no serious confusion need result.
^*W^] ^o/«5 and News. 247
North American birds. At first the groups were mostly limited to the
Passeres, and each group usually consisted of a single pair of birds, with
its nest and eggs, or young, as the case might be, placed in their natural
surroundings, reproduced in facsimile. Later more ambitious pieces
were attempted, but not till 1901 was there anything on a very large
scale.
In that year the ' Bird Rock Group ^ was installed containing seventy-
three birds, illustrating seven species, and forming a group seventeen
and a half feet long and six feet ten inches high. The species represented
are the Common and BrUnnich^s Murres, the Razor-billed Auk, the
Kittiwake Gull, the Puffin, Gannet, and Leach's Petrel, the scene being
a section of a cliff on Bird Rock, in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, where all
these species nest in close proximity. The reproduction is realistic in
the highest degree, so that the group gives the visitor to the Museum an
exact representation of the home life of the breeding sea bird colonies in
the far north.
This masterpiece of the taxidermist's art is admirably supplemented by
a large descriptive label, and with large photographs from nature of
portions of the Bird Rock colony, and a diagrammatic explanation of the
group. In addition to the label, the Museum has issued a * guide leaflet '
to the group, in the form of a supplement to the * American Museum
Journal,' (Vol.1, No. 11, Oct., 1901)1 forming an octavo pamphlet of 24
pages, with numerous half-tone illustrations from photographs from
nature and of the group. The text gives a history of this famous Bird
Rock from the time of its first description by Jacques Cartier in 1534 ^^
the present time, followed by an enumeration and description of the sea
birds still breeding there. This pamphlet is placed on sale, for the
convenience of visitors, at the nominal price of five cents per copy.
A companion piece to the Bird Rock Group has just been installed,
representing, on a similar scale and in an equally realistic manner, the
bird life of the seashore as illustrated at Cobb's Island, on the coast of
Virginia. This group is of the same length and height as the Bird Rock
Group, but the width has been considerably extended, to give room for
the better display of the birds, which occupy a sandy beach instead of
the irregular face of a cliff.
To supply the background effect, furnished by the cliif itself in the
Bird Rock Group, resort has been very successfully made to the skill of
the panoramic artist, who has supplied a canvas background appropri-
ately supplementing the scene suggested by the birds in the foreground,
with so skillful an effect that the line of junction of the real and the
simulated is difficult to distinguish. The number of species included is
seven, represented by sixty-three specimens, and their haunts and manner
of nesting are presented with extreme fidelity of detail. The birds repre-
sented are the Black Skimmer, the Common Tern, the Least Tern, the
Gull-billed Tern, the Oyster-catcher, and the Wilson Plover. The scene
is a sandy beach, strewn with oyster and other sea shells, interspersed with
248 Notts and News. [jjjj
tufts of the coarse grass characteristic of such beaches- The group can-
not, however, be considered complete until supplied with its large descrip-
tive label, now in preparation, and illustrated with enlarged photographs
from nature, and with the * guide leaflet* that will give the details of bird
colony life on the beaches of a low sandy island.
The Museum is to be congratulated on taking the lead in the work of
providing realistic representations of bird life as it exists under widely
varying conditions in nature, for it is perfectly safe to say that no other
Museum in the world has placed before its visitors such attractive and
instructive bird exhibits as are here to be seen. Therefore not only is
credit due the Museum authorities for furnishing the means and the
authorization for such work, but especially to the Associate Curator of
the Department of Mammalogy and Ornithology, Mr. Frank M. Chapman,
for its conception, and the gathering personally in the field of the mate-
rial for the groups, the photographs for their illustration, and the buper-
vision of their preparation. To Mr. H. C. Denslow is also due great
praise for the skill displayed in the preservation and posing of the numer-
ous individual birds represented, especially the downy nestlings and half
grown young which form so important a feature of the exhibit.
The National Committkr of Audubon Societies has begun to issue
•A series of * Educational Leaflets/ which it is hoped will be the means of
doing much good among agricultural people and in the schooU through-
out the countrv.
No. I, treating of the Nighthawk, was published Jan. i, 1903, and No. 2,
on the Mourning Dove, March i. No. 3, on the Meadowlark, and No. 4.
on the Robin, will Ix? published May i and July i, respect i%-ely.
It is hoped that the demand for these leaflets will be so large that the
Committee will Ik* warranted in continuing the issue at intervals of tuo
months until a large number ot the common species of birds of North
America have l>een thus treated.
The leaflets are of unit'orni size, 5} X SJ inches, 4 pp. The first page
is ilhistrated with a half tone 4X5 of the species tre«itcd, from original
drawings hv Louis Ai^assiz Kiiertes. The second page give?* the descrip-
tion and distribution of the species, while the rem.Tinder of the leaflet
gives the latest facts lej^arding tlie economic status of the species, from
data furnished by the Biological Survey, I'. S. Department of Agriculture.
li^aoh leaflet contains a series of • Study Points for Teachers and
Scholars.' which will, if followed, enable them to gain a comprehensive
knowIed>{e of the bird in (piestion.
These leallets can U* supplied for 50 cts. per hundred, or $3.00 per
thousand, postage or expressagc included.
It the n)enihcrs of the A. (). V . will encourage the distribution of these
leaflets thev will he advancing il>e cause of bird protection along educa-
tional lines, the channel through which the most good can be done at the
present time.— Wii.ija.m Diiciikk, CAairnniM, A. O. U, Proteciiom Com-
mittt'C.
CONTENTS.
ll<Ai.'an»-C <i» TUK Esrllii)* liouw Ik [lAitiUt. B) JIT. It', Itmlun.
(/■au» r//.i , . . ,
W. ^ , Vf. /, jr l; M. B, O. V,
A LlH (!► tB» Lll~U B ISO* lit IUK( VnuLM, Cl-ii- •
CluvooKM^ By Mffmr i". Jt^. (Wata ►'/// .
roOI' HUaiTt IIF SOMI WH7 1hd<«r I>i»» By K
A Rrfitw or rii* Rixi:> CAnuni**L Bt Hurrf '- -
A Svnorire nr tii» ii««i» Pi*i,i«tfAi.ii«. B» //«!»/ ' - i^'.-i---'
h l.KT (•> L*VU BlM» >l>aH QlH-rtAI. WuiltKbTIW. E? JtlMn e. Jlll^pm.
i-.K^rxi. N'.f»-.— Tt
..iloT. i>(i A H
>Ah WUko. 11
r»^« on ■ N» Ton rmn Sirkn Itltiul. )|.
no*. Un WhKlMk-i'S'HillnciuI r<H*u ic
I )ra>llmli.«i<3l Club, i, ■ ; l>uh]iuilnD. Riccivt
inu AxciiiKtti.^ClWuunr; ThanunMclInHillli, iin John Nulunkl DMk. !«> r.iH.^
Wai«n,t». l-hc MkhlKm liniiiholnKlnl nub, it<i Vmnovl BbitUHh :.,
b«Ml PuUiuUuio. M<: frupoKri A (I. H Uri1ii( la U hcM In LUUan.*
« Ibc Amnbin Muiniiii -i Naiuiil IIIiUht, t^i VVi.ik •>! tlw A. M V I >.
LSI
Ciuj
TuRM* ( — $1,00 u \ria. inOuJIng pottugc, Ktikilv In ailVaiKP. sioule mum-
bets, 7? ii-iiifc. FriT \(> lloiorarj Kellovn, and h> Pcllutt*. MrmWr*,Ml
A«Hidurcf uf ilic A. G. U iiul In um-jin (or Jue*.
SubMriptions and Adv«fU««nenlB *liotiUI Iir luUliratril lo -TMIi .MUL*
V IVu»i.-r(.> Strkui, Camiiriiiv.k. Mab^., or it> WILUAM DL'TCIItB.
ll<i>li>o( Mniiagrr. Sis Miniiattak Avk.. Nnw Vokk, S. V. Fofaln S«fr
«ctibera loM. ohhiio ' I')iii Aik ' ibrouxli Gl'RKE^' AND JACKhON. j
^
CONTINUATION Or THE
BULLETIN OF THE NUTTALL ORNITHOLOGICAL CIU8
The Auk
a 0uarterlv Journal of fiDtnit^ology
, ZZ — JTTX.7, 1903— ITo. 3 1
THE AUK :
A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF
ORNITHOLOGY.
Vol. XX. J^-ly, 1903, No. 3
NOTES ON THE ORNITHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS
OF PETER KALM.
BY SPENCER TROTTER.
A PECULIAR interest lends itself to pioneer work in any branch
of knowledge, and the early history of things holds a charm that
is hard to explain on purely logical grounds. Such an interest
gathers about the work of Peter Kalm, the Swede, who travelled
in North America during the years 1748-175 1. Kalm was prima-
rily a botanist and was sent out to America to gather specimens
of plants and seeds with a view to the acclimatization of different
species in Sweden. On his return to Sweden he published an
accoimt of his observations and travels in a work of three volumes
entitled * En Resa Til Norra America,' which appeared at Stock-
holm between the years 17 53-1 761. The original was later trans-
lated into English, German, and Dutch, the English translation
by John Reinhold Forster appearing in three volumes und£r the
title of 'Travels into North America,' published at London in
1770-177 1. Forster was an English naturalist of some note and
his name is commemorated in one of the beautiful species of
North American terns.
Accustomed as we are to look upon Wilson and Audubon as the
pioneers in American Ornithology we are apt to lose sight of ear-
lier workers in the field who left behind no great monuments.
To be sure, Mark Catesby's work (i 730-1 748) is a pre-Wilsonian
monument of illustrated ornithology, and the works of Ekiwards,
2 CO Tkottkr^ KalmU Omit kologieal Observaiioms* L^«^
Pennant, and Latham contain numerous illustrations of North
American birds. Peter Kalm's work, on the other hand, is merely
a desultory account of the different birds he observed during his
sojourn, principally in the country about Philade^hia, scattered
through the text of the volumes, coupled with observations
borrowed from the more intelligent Swedish and English resi-
dents. The greater number of species seems altogether to have
escaped his notice, probably because the plant rather than the bird
was in his mind's eye. Kalm's observations have little scientific
value, but they possess a certain freshness that commends them
to every lover of the wayside. It is restful in these days of accu-
rately annotated lists of many geographical forms to turn to the
simple statements of what this man saw and heard and thought.
The birds he tells us about are only the common birds known to
the country folk. His observations give us a glimpse of historical
background — a bit of real bird life in America more than half a
century before the father of American Ornithology begmn his work.
Kalm mentions a number of birds observed during the voyage,
including the Petrel, Shearwater, Tropic Bird, Gull, and Tern.
''The Petrel {Proallaria PdagUa^ Linn.)," says Kalm, ^^ was our
companion from the channel to the shores of America.''
It is probable that he had under observation not only the Stormy
Petrels (/I pelagicd) but the other two species of '^ little black
white-rumped * Mother Carey's Chickens'" — Leach's Petrel
{Oceanodroma kucorhoa)^ and Wilson's Petrel {^OceanUes oceankus)
as well.
The shearwater described under the name of ^^ ProctUmrm
PufflnuSf Linn." is probably referable to three species — the Manx
Shearwater {Puffinus puffinus)^ the Greater Shearwater {P. major),
and the Sooty Shearwater {P. fuHgifwsus) — for Kalm speaks of
having seen the bird from " the channel to the American coasts " ;
also that ''it has a brown back, and commonly a white ring round
its neck." The first species is abundant on the eastern side, but
rare on the western side of the Atlantic, while the word "com-
monly " would seem to indicate that some individuals of the Sooty
Shearwater — a solid colored species — were also seen. A num-
ber of land birds took refuge on the ship from time to time, and
were noted by Kalm.
^Hu^] TRornm, Kulm^9 OrmitUi0gieal OhtervaiUm, 25 1
The foUowing observations peitain to the several species of
American birds noted by Kahn. These ornithological observa-
tioos are scattered through the book, sandwiched in among the
mass of heterogeneous matter gathered by this untiring recorder.
'' No circumstance interesting to natural history or to any other
part of literature has been omitted." The first English edition of
3 vols, (from which these notes have been drawn) and the second
edition of 2 vols. (1772) contain numerous notes by the translator.
The binomial nomenclature, affixed to the species, is evidently the
work of Kalm after his return to Sweden, for, as Dr. Coues
observes, '' these accounts are among the bases of several Linnaean
species, though largely anticipated by Catesby and Edwards''
(Birds of the Colorado Valley, Bibliographical Appendix, p. 585).
Ducks — Sp. 1 — Under date of October 30, 1748, Kalm men-
tions seeing large numbers of ducks between Staten Island and
''the town of New York.'' "We saw a number of wild ducks in
immense quantities upon the water : the people called them Blue
bills, and they seemed to be the same with our Pintail dtuks^ or
Lmnams^s Anas acuta \ but they were very shy." (Eng. Trans.,
Vol. I, p. 237.)
Wild fowl had evidendy greatly decreased in numbers even at
fte time Kalm wrote, as appears in a note written at Philadelphia
under date of November 9, 1748. The note is concluded with
the following observation : ^* But since the arrival of great crowds
of Eur&peans^ things are greatly changed : the country is well
peopled, and the woods are cut down : the people increasing in
this country, they have by himting and shooting in part extirpated
the birds, in part scared them away : in spring the people still
take both eggs, mothers and yoimg indifferently, because no regu-
lations are made to the contrary. And if any had been made, the
spirit of freedom which prevails in the country would not suffer
them to be obeyed."
Cranes. — Under date of February 17, 1749, at the village of
Raccoon, New Jersey, a few miles below Philadelphia and almost
opposite the site of Chester, Pa., Kalm makes the following obser-
vation:
''Cranes {Ardea Canadensis) were sometimes seen flying in the
day-time, to the northward. They commonly stop here early in
2C2 Tkott'B.k^ Kaln^s Ornitkologrical Observaii^ms. FJoS
spring, for a short time, but they do not make their nests here,
for they proceed on more to the north. Certain old Swedes told
me, that in their younger years, as the country was not yet much
cultivated, an incredible number of cranes were here every spring ;
but at present they are not so numerous. Several people who
have settled here, eat their flesh, when they can shoot them.
They are said to do no harm to corn, or the like." (Eng. Trans.,
II, p. 72.)
The Whooping Crane (Grus americana) was at one time
abundant on our Atlantic seaboard, and this is the species prob-
ably referred to by Kalm. Dr. Coues says of G. anuricana : *' So
wild and wary a bird must be much influenced by the settlement
of the country."
Partridges. — At Raccoon, New Jersey, where Kalm spent
much of his time among the Swedes, is a note under date of
January 22, 1749, in which we can hardly fail to recognize our
Virginia Partridge or " Bob White." The " hazel-hen " referred
to in the following note is undoubtedly the Ruffed Grouse —
" the birds which the Swedes in this country call Partridges and
Hazel-hens were in whole flocks in the woods " (Eng. Trans., Vol.
I, p. 290). While at Montreal Kalm heard of a bird which he
judged to be the ^^ Ptarmigans^ or Snow-hens {Tetrao Lagopus)P
(Eng. Trans., Ill, p. 58.)
Wild Turkey. — " Turkey Cocks and Hens run about in the
woods of this country, and differ in nothing from our tamer ones,
except in their superior size, and redder, though more palatable
flesh. When their eggs are found in the wood, and put under
7//r^r>' hens, the young ones become tame; however when they
grow up, it sometimes happens that they fly away ; their wings are
therefore commonly clipped, especially when young. But the
tamed turkeys are commonly much more irascible, than those
which are naturally tame. The Indians likewise employ them-
selves in taming them and keeping them near their huts." (Eng.
Trans., I, p. 209.)
Wild Pigeon.— At Raccoon, New Jersey, under date of March
3, 1749, occurs the following note: — " Wild Pigeons (Columba
Migratorid), flew in the woods, in number beyond conception, and
I was assured that they were more plentiful than they had been
'^^^^^j Trotter, Kalm*s Ornithological Observations, 253
for several years past. They came this week, and continued here
for about a fortnight, after which they all disappeared, or advanced
further into the country, from whence they came." (Eng. Trans.,
II, p. 82.)
Hummingbird. — "Of all the rare birds of North America^ ih^
Humming Bird is the most admirable, or at least most worthy of
peculiar attention. Several reasons induce me to believe that few
parts of the world can produce its equal. Dr. Linnaus calls it
Trochilus Colubris. The Swedes and some Englishmen call it the
King's bird, but the name of Humming bird is more common."
(Eng. Trans., I, p. 210.) •
Following this statement are five pages devoted to the description
and habits of this interesting little bird, which seems to have
excited the wonder and admiration of so many of the early travel-
lers in America.
Whip-poor-will. — At Raccoon, New Jersey, under date of
April 22, 1749, Kalm gives a somewhat lengthy account of this
species, calling attention to the peculiarity of its notes as
follows : — " I heard it to-day, for the first time, and many other
people said, that they had not heard it before this summer ; its
English and Swedish name is taken from its note ; but, accurately
speaking, it does not call Whipperiwilly nor Whip-poor-will^ but
rather Whipperiwhip^ so that the first and last syllables are
accented, and the intermediate ones but slightly pronounced.
The English change the call of this bird into Whip-poor-will ^ that
it may have some kind of signification : it is neither heard nor
seen in day-time; but soon after sunset it begins to call, and con-
tinues for a good while, as the cuckow does in Europe." Obser-
vations on the habits of the bird follow. (Eng. Trans., II, p.
Woodpeckers. — At Philadelphia, under date of October i, 1748,
Kalm writes : " A Black Woodpecker with a red head, or the Picus
pUeatuSy Linn, is frequent in the Pennsylvanian forests, and stays
the winter, as I know from my own experience. It is reckoned
among those birds which destroy the maize ; because it settles on
the ripe ears, and destroys them with its bill. The Swedes call it
TUlkrokay but all other woodpeckers, those with gold yellow wings
excepted, are called Hackspkkar in the Swedish language. I
254 Trottbk, Kmlm*$ OrmtkoUgitml Ob9mrvmiimu> [ j^^
intend to describe them altogether more exactly in a particular
work. I only observe here, that almost all the different species of
woodpeckers are very noxious to the maize, when it begins to
ripen : for by picking holes in the membrane round the ear, the
rain gets into it, and causes the ear with all the cum it contains to
rot." (Eng. Trans., I, p. 148.)
Kalm had not yet spent a winter in America, though be speaks
in the above note of knowing this bird to stay through the winter
from his own experience. It is evident, therefore, that his original
notes were carefully gone over upon his return to Sweden, in view
of their publication. Under date of March 11, 1749, at Raccoon,
New Jersey, a list of the woodpeckers was drawn up, and later
revised. It b interesting as being probably the first annotated
list of any group of North American birds. (Eng. Trans., II, pp.
85-88.) In this review of the woodpeckers by Kalm the most
notable fact, which must be taken cum grano salusj is the occur-
rence of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker, as far north as the Dela-
ware Valley. Possibly the bird had been observed as a straggler
(for Kalm speaks of it as being only an occasional visitor) on the
borders of the dense cedar swamps and pine forests of South Jersey.
and this region we know is decidedly Carolinian in its faunal and
floral features. At that time also a more or less unbroken wood-
land must have extended far up along the shores of the Delaware.
quite to the site of the old Swedish village of Raccoon. But this
is idle speculation, for the bird has never been authenticnlly
reported from Pennsylvania or New Jersey.
The Pileated Woodpecker is a true forest lover, and even in the
time of Alexander Wilson had, like the Indian, reirt-aled into the
wilderness beyond the ever widening domain of cleared land.
Kalm seems to have been imbued with the notion that the
smaller species of woodpeckers were enemies to agriculture and
the orchards. The sins of the real sai>-sucker were shared for
many long years by his less-o (Tending brethren. The word
"flicker" does not appear among the local names of CoIafUs
auratus, the species being referred to as the "gold-winged wood-
pecker" and also under its Swedish names of " Hiltock'' and
"Piut." The ground-loving habits of this bird, the palatability of
its flesh, and its resemblance to the European cuckoo are com-
mented upon.
^ w[*l TmOTTKR, Kalm's Ornithological Observations, 255
The remarks of Kalm concerning the abundance of the Red-
headed Woodpecker (Melanerpes erytkroccphalus) in early winter as
predicting a mild season brings to mind an observation made
some years ago by Chris Wood, the collector. He predicted a
winter of great sickness from the fact that Red-headed Wood-
peckers were miusually numerous, and added that he had never
known this prognostic to fail. This is an interesting piece of folk-
lore and is probably akin to the old saying that ^^ a green Christ-
mas makes a fat churchyard."
The species enumerated, other than those above mentioned, are
Sphyrapicus variuSy Dryobaies vilhsuSy D. pubescens^ and Me-
kmerpes caroUnus.
Crow. — At Philadelphia, under date of September 26, 1748, is
the following observation concerning crows. " The Crows in this
country are little different from our common crows in Sweden,
Their size is the same with that of our crows, and they are as
black as jet in every part of their body. I saw them flying to-day
in great numbers together. Their voice is not quite like that of
our crows, but has more of the cry of the rook, or LtnncBus^s Corvus
frugilegus," (Eng. Trans., I, p. 121.)
Under date of February 10, 1749, Kalm alludes to the premiums
set upon crows' heads in the following passage. " They belong to
the noxious birds in this part of the world, for they chiefly live
upon corn. After the maize is planted or sown, they scratch the
grains out of the ground and eat them. When the maize begins
to ripen, they peck a hole into the involucrum which surrounds
the ear, by which means the maize is spoiled, as the rain passes
through the hole which they have made, and occasions the putri-
f action of the corn. Besides eating corn, they likewise steal
chickens. They are very fond of dead carcasses. Some years
ago the government of Pennsylvania had given three-pence, and
that of New Jersey four-pence premium for every head of a crow,
but this law has now been repealed, as the expenses are too great."
Blackbirds. — In remarking upon the decrease of wild fowl
(already cited) Kalm goes on to say : " But though the eatable
birds have been diminished greatly, yet there are others, which
have rather increased than decreased in number, since the arrival
of the Europeans : this can most properly be said of a species of
^
256 Trottib.r^ Kalm's OrHi'tkological Obstrvaiious, [tuf
daws which the English call Blackbirds [a foot-note speaks of them
as ^^ Properly shining blackbirds ^^\ and the Swedes Maize thiet^es,
Dr, Linnceus calls them Gracula Quiscula." (Eng. Trans., I, p.
291.)
Under date of February 23, 1749, at Raccoon, New Jersey, is a
lengthy account of blackbirds, in which the author, among other
observations, calls attention to the following :
" A species of birds, called by the Swedes, maize-thieves, do the
greatest mischief in this country. They have given them that
name, because they eat maize, both publicly and secretly, just
after it is sown and covered with the ground, and when it is ripe.
The English call them blackbirds. There are two species of them,
both described and drawn by Catesby, Though they arc very
different in species, yet there is so great a friendship between
them, that they frequently accompany each other in mixed fk>cks.
However, in Pennsylvania, the first sort are more obvious, and
often fly together, without any of the red-winged stares As
they are so destructive to maize, the odium of the inhabitants
against them is carried so far, that the laws of Pennslyvania and
New Jersey have settled a premium of three-pence a dozen for
dead maize thieves. In New England^ the people are still greater
enemies to them; for Dr. Franklin [Benjamin Franklin] told me,
in the spring of the year 1750, that, by means of the premiums
which have been settled for killing them in New England^ they
have been so extirpated, that they are very rarely seen, and in a
few places only. But as, in the summer of the year 1749, an
immense quantity of worms appeared in the meadows, which
devoured the grass, and did great damage, the people have
abated their enmity against the maize-thieves ; for they thought
they had observed, that those birds lived chiefly on these worms
before the maize is ripe, and consequently extirpated them, or at
least prevented their spreading too much. They seem therefore
to be entitled, as it were, to a reward for their trouble. But after
these enemies and destroyers of the worms (the maize-thieves)
were extirpated, the worms were more at liberty to multiply : and
therefore they grew so numerous, that they did more mischief now
than the birds did before. In the summer, 1749, the worms left
so little hay in New England, that the inhabitants were forced to
^*«W^] Trotter, KalnCs Ornithological Observations. 257
get hay from Pennsylvania^ and even from Old England, The
maize-thieves have enemies besides the human species. A species
of Httle hawks live upon them, and upon other little birds. I saw
some of these hawks driving up the maize-thieves, which were in
the greatest security, and catching them in the air. Nobody eats
the flesh of the purple maize-thieves or daws {Gracula quisculd)\
but that of the red-winged maize-thieves, or stares {Oriolus
Photniceus) is sometimes eaten. Some old people have told me,
that this part of America^ formerly called New Sweden^ still con-
tained as many maize-thieves as it did formerly. The cause of
this they derive from the maize, which is now sown in much
greater quantity than formerly ; and they think that the birds can
get their food with more ease at present" (Eng. Trans., II, pp.
73-79-)
The purple " maize-thieves '' are apparently as abundant now,
about Philadelphia, as they were in the time that Kalm wrote of
them. They come to us about the last of February, as Kalm
noted more than a century and a half ago, and during the early
autumn swarm in incredible numbers over the fields of standing
corn. One autumn blackbird roost that I have known of for
several years past, on the edge of a populous town, must contain
thousands of birds. The babel of voices from this roost at sun-
down is a sound never to be forgotten and falls on the distant ear
as a continuous roar.
Bobolink. — In a journey up the Hudson during the month of
June, 1749, Kalm first saw the bobolink, as is attested by the fol-
lowing note: ^^ The white-backed Maize-thieves appeared now and
then, flying amongst the bushes : their note is fine, and they are
not so large as the black maize-thieves {Oriolus Phijeniceus), We
saw them near New York, for the first time." (Eng. Trans., II,
p. 274.)
Cardinal. — At Raccoon, New Jersey, under date of February
14, 1749, Kalm has entered in his journal the following note:
^* Red-bird is another species of small bird. Catesby has likewise
figured it. Dr. Linnaus calls it, Loxia Cardinalis, It belongs to
that class of birds which are enemies to bees, lying in wait for
them and eating them. I fed a cock for five months together in
a cage ; it eat both maize and buckwheat, for I gave it nothing
258 Trotter, Kalm*s Ormitk^Ugiemi Ok$€rvmiUm$. [^
else. By its song it attracted others of its species to the court-
yard, and after we had put some maize on the ground under the
window where I had it, the others came there every day to get
their food ; it was then easy to catch them by means of traps.
Some of them, especially old ones, both cocks and hens, would
die of grief on being put into cages. Those on the other hand
which were grown tame, b^^ to sing exceedingly sweeL Their
note very nearly resembles that of our European nightingale, and
on account of their agreeable song, they are sent abundantly to
London, in cages. They have such strength in their bill that
when you hold your hand to them they pinch it so hard as to
cause the blood to issue forth. In spring they sit warbling on the
tops of the highest trees in the woods, in the morning. But in
cages they sit quite still for an hour ; the next hour they hop up
and down, singing ; and so they go on alternately all day.'' (Eng.
Trans., II, p. 71.)
Snowbird. — In the journal at Raccoon, New Jersey, dated
January 21, 1749, is the following note: ''A small kind of birds,
which the Swedes call Snowbird, and the English ChucMird, come
into the houses about this time. At other times, they sought
their food along the roads. They are seldom seen, but when it
snows. Catesby, in his Natural History of Carolina^ calls it Passer
Nivalis ; and Dr. Linnceus, in his Sy sterna Naturce^ calls it Emberiia
hycmalis.^^ (Eng- Trans., II, p. 51.)
Again, under date of March 3, 1749, at Raccoon, is the follow-
ing : " The Swedes call a species of little birds, Snofogel, and the
English call it Stuno-bird. This is Dr. Linnaus^s Emberiza hyema-
lis. The reason why it is called snow-bird is because it never
appears in summer, but only in winter, when the fields are cov-
ered with snow. In some winters they come in as great numbers
as the maize thieves, fly about the houses and barns, into the gar-
dens, and eat the corn, and the seeds of grass, which they find
scattered on the hills." (fc^ng. Trans., II, p. 81.)
Swallows. — "April the i6th [1749]. This morning I returned
to Raccoon [from Chester, Penna., on the opposite side of the
Delaware]. This country has several kinds of swallows, viz. such
as live in bams, in chimneys, and under ground; there are like-
wise martens.
^^^^] Trotter, Kalm'% Ornithological ObservatioHs. 259
'' The Bam Swallows ^ or House Swallows are those with a f ur-
cate4 tail. They are Linnaeus's Hirundo rustica, I found thero
in all parts of North America which I travelled over. [This state-
ment shows that the original entry about swallows in the journal
was shaped up after Kalm's return to Sweden, for as yet he had
only travelled as far as New York and back]. They correspond
very neaily to the European House Swallow in regard to then:
colour, however there seems to be a small difference in the note.
I took no notice this year when they arrived : but the following
year, 1750, I observed them for the first time on the loth of
April (new style) ; the next day in the morning, I saw great num-
bers of them sitting on posts and planks, and they were as wet as
if they had been just come out of the sea. [At this point is
inserted a lengthy editorial excursus by Forster on the hibernation
of swallows.] They build their nests in houses, and imder the
roofs on the outside ; I likewise found their nests built on moun-
tains and rocks whose top projected beyond the bottom; they
build too under the corners of perpendicular rocks; and this
shews where the Swallows made their nests, before the Europeans
settled and built houses here ; for it is well known that the huts
of the Indians could not serve the purpose of the Swallows,
" The Chimney Swallows are the second species, and they derive
their name from building their nests in chimneys which are not
made use of in summer : sometimes when the fire is not very
great, they do not mind the smoke, and remain in the chimney. I
did not see them this year till late in May^ but in the ensuing year,
1750, they arrived on the 3rd of May, for they appear much later
than the other Swallows, It is remarkable that each feather in
their tail ends is a stiff sharp point, like the end of an awl ; they
apply the tail to the side of the wall of^ the chimneys, hold them-
selves with their feet, and the stiff tail serves to keep them up :
they make a great thundering noise all the (fay long, by flying up
and down in the chimneys ; and as they build their nests in chim-
neys only, and it is well known that the Indians have not so much
as a hearth made of masonry, much less a chimney, but make their
fires on the ground in their huts, it is an obvious question, where
did these Swallows build their nests before the Europeans came,
and made houses with chimneys ? It is probable that they form-
260 Trotter, Kalm's Orniikological Observations. f j[^
erly built them in great hollow trees. This opinion was adopted
by Mr. Bartram [the elder Bartram — John Bartram, the first
American botanist and correspondent of Linnaeus], and many
others here. Catesby has described the Chimney Swallow and
figured it, and Dr. LintuEus calls it Hirundo Pelasgia,
"The Ground Swallows ox Sand Martins^ {Linmeus's Hirundo
riparia) are to be met with everywhere in America \ they make
their nests in the ground on the steep shores of rivers and lakes.
" The Purple Martins have likewise been described and drawn
in their natural colours by Catesby. Dr. Linmeus likewise calls
them Hirundo purpurea. They are less common here than the
former species ; I have seen in several places little houses made of
boards, and fixed on the outside of the walls, on purpose that
these Martins may make their nests in them ; for the people arc
very desirous of having them near their houses, because they both
drive away hawks and crows as soon as they see them, and alarm
the poultry by their anxious note, of the approach of their ene-
mies. The chickens are likewise used to run under shelter, as
soon as they are warned by the Martinsr (£ng. Trans. II, pp.
140-148.)
Probably half a century before Kalm wrote the Swifts, the
Martins, and the Bam Swallows had forsaken the rock ledge and
hollow tree to cast in their lot with the settlers, doubtless remind-
ing many a sad heart of —
"The swallow twittVing from the straw-built shed,"
in the old homes across the sea.
Mockingbird. — While journeying to New York, at a point not
far from Philadelphia, Kalm entered a note in his journal, under
date of October 27, 1748, from which the following passage is
taken. "At one of the places where we stopt to have our horses
fed, the people had a Mocking-bird in a cage ; and it is. here reck-
oned the best singing-bird, though its plumage is very simple, and
not showy at all. At this time of the year it does not sing.
Linnaus calls it Turdus polyglottos, and Catesby in his Natural
History of Carolina, Vol. I, p. 27, tab. 27, has likewise described
and drawn this bird. The people said that it built its nests in the
bushes and trees, but is so shy, that if anybody come and look at
its eggs, it leaves the nest, never to come to it again/' (EnS-
Trans., I, pp. 217-219).
^iL^l Trottek, KalnCs Ornithological Observations, 26 1
This is interesting as an early northern record for the mocking-
bird. From Kahn's statements it would appear that the bird was
a more or less common summer resident in the region about Phila-
delphia. The species does occasionally breed in this neighbor-
hood and may have been much more abundant in the earlier days
of the settlements.
Catbird. — Under date of September 7, 1748, at Philadelphia
is the following note : "Mr. Peter Cockj a merchant of this town,
assured me that he had last week himself been a spectator of a
snake's swallowing a little bird. This bird, which from its cry
has the name of Cat bird, {Muscicapa Carolirunsis, Linn,) flew from
one branch of a tree to another, and was making a doleful tune."
(Eng. Trans., I, p. 61.)
The rest of the narrative is a "snake story." Suffice it to say
that the snake swallowed the bird, but was ultimately killed by
the valiant Cock. Mr. Cock, by the way, was a very reputable
citizen.
Robin. — In Kalm's journal at Raccoon, under date of March
12, 1749, is the following short note concerning the robin : "The
bird which the English and Swedes in this country call Robin-red-
breast, is found here all the year round. It is a very different bird
from that which in England bears the same name. It is Linnceus*s
Turdus migratorius. It sings very melodiously, is not very shy,
but hops on the ground quite close to the houses." (Eng. Trans.,
II, p. 90.)
Bluebird. — A note dated Raccoon, New Jersey, February 14,
1749, says : "The Swedes and the English gave the name of blue-
bird to a very pretty little bird, which was of a fine blue colour,
Linnaeus calls it Motacilla Sialis, Catesby has drawn it in his
Natural History of Carolina, Vol. I, pi. 47, and described it by the
name of Rubecula Americana ccerulea nitida, pectore riifo, ventre
albo. In Catesby's plate I must observe, that the color of the
breast ought to be dirty red or ferruginous ; the tibiae and feet
black as jet ; the bill too should be quite black ; the blue colour
in general ought to be much deeper, more lively and shining ; no
bird in Sweden has so shining and deep a blue color as this : The
jay has perhaps a plumage like it. The food of the blue bird is
not merely insects, he likewise feeds upon plants; therefore in
262 Maxon, Birds cf Madison Commiy^ N. Y. [j||^
winter, when no insects are to be met with, they come to the farm-
houses in order to subsist on the seeds of hay, and other small
grains." (Eng. Trans., JI, p. 70.)
There is little of value to the ornithologist in these fragmentary
notes, but the quaintness of the statements, and the pictures which
they call up of birds against the background of those early times
possess a certain charm in themselves. Moreover, as Dr. Coues
has remarked, some of these descriptions formed the basis of sev-
eral Linnsan species. Kalm saw the birds for himself and came
directly in contact with their surroundings. Therein lies the
charm. He left no great work as a monument, but so long as
the beautiful Kalipia grows on our hillsides his name will be
remembered as that of the friend of Linnseus.
NOTES ON THE BIRDS OF MADISON COUNTY, NEW
YORK, WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO
EMBODY'S RECENT LIST.
BY WILLIAM R. MAXON.
The notes here offered are intended to supplement Mr.
Embody's * Birds of Madison County, New York,* which was
reviewed briefly in *The Auk * for January, 1902. Mr. Embody's
list, professedly incomplete, embodied mainly the results of inves-
tigations in the southeastern portion of the county and properly
might have borne a less general title ; for, small as Madison
County is, it is extremely diverse in its biologic associations and
many distinct areas must be studied carefully before anything like
a comprehensive understanding, or for that matter more than a
tolerably complete list, of the avifauna may be had. The central
portion of the county, including several high-lying swamps and
adjacent hills near Peterboro, have been worked by Mr. G. S.
Miller, Jr., who has kindly furnished me many notes hitherto
unpublished. To the southward and westward, however, is a simi-
^1w^] Maxon, Birds of Madison Commiy, AT, K 263
lar territory of higher elevation, with crests ranging to 2000 feet
and more, which so far as I know is quite untouched ; and in the
northwestern portion a considerable territory, including several
low swamps not much above the level of nearby Oneida Lake,
likewise awaits investigation. These unexplored areas are bound
to yield interesting results. Of this I am convinced by the unex-
pected returns from several short excursions I have undertaken, in
the northeastern p>ortion, over the Stockbridge West Hill which
reaches a maximum altitude of 1300 feet. Here, for example, I
found a good sized colony of the Cerulean Warbler.
Madison County falls for the most part well within the Transi-
tion or Alleghanian zone, but there is an odd intermingling of
Canadian and Carolinian forms. The Stockbridge West Hill and
its opposite slope at the east form the sides of a broad northerly-
trending glacial valley (drained by Oneida Creek), some twelve
miles long, which, at a point some seven or eight miles south of
the eastern end of Oneida Lake, runs out to the level country
marking the bed of the ancient stream, that once swept Central
New York from the westward. It is this region with which I am
most familiar and to which my own records mainly apply. The
following notes are published with especial reference to Mr.
Embody's list ; and in several instances reference is made to ear-
lier records overlooked in its preparation.
1. Ardetta ezilis. Least Bittbrn. — Said to be *^ rarely seen in
Madison County. One male taken May 30, 1897.'' Several specimens
have been taken in the Cowasselon Swamp near Oneida during August.
2. Nycticorax nycticorax naevius. Black-crowned Night Heron.
— Not mentioned in the list; may be put down as an occasional transient
visitant (See Bagg in Auk, XIV, 227, 1897).
3. Agialitis vocifera. K^lldeer. — Given as a ^'very common sum-
mer resident." In the northeastern parts of the county the bird is
rather uncommon, and it seems likely that its distribution is very local
throughout.
4. Colinus virginianus. Bob-white. — **None recorded since 1893.
Formerly a not uncommon summer resident." Still occasional between
Oneida and the Lake. A nest was taken at Peterboro in the summer of
1894, the only time the bird has been known to occur in that vicinity.
(See also Auk, XIV, 226, 1897, and XVII, 178, 1900.)
5. Zenaidura macroura. Mourning Dove. — *'Rare. One bird seen
April 28, 1896." This statement is to be accounted for only upon the
264
Maxon, Birds of Madison County ^ N. K ff'Jl
LJoly
score of oversight. The bird is common all the way from the lowlands
of Oneida Lake south along the Stockbridge Valley to Munnsville and to
Eaton where I have repeatedly observed small flocks in the buckwheat
fields. Out of more than 25 nests found the majority were in apple trees
but occasionally in a pine, a white cedar, or upon a fallen log.
6. Haliaetus leucocephalus. Bald Eagle. — Decidedly less common
than formerly, but still to be seen on Oneida Lake. Lewis Point, near
South Bay, has been a favorite nesting place for many years.
7. Dryobates villosus. Hairy Woodpkcker. — **^Very common resi-
dent. Breeds." It seems extremely doubtful if this species is "very
common " in any part of the county; certainly it is tolerably rare in the
northern portion.
8. Sphyrapicus varius. Yellow-bellied Sapsucker. — Mr. Embodv
reckons this a "very common transient visitant." It is only tolerably
common as a migrant, but a few remain to breed.
9. Melanerpes carolinus. Red-bellied Woodpecker. — "Of rare
and irregular occurrence. One recorded March 8, 1898." Mr. Miller has
recorded also (Auk, IX, 201, 1892) taking a bird at Peterboro, Feb. 16, 1SS6.
10. Antrostomus vocifenis. Whip-poor-will. — Included bv Mr.
Embody only in his hypothetic list. A common summer resident, how-
ever, in the low woods about Oneida Lake, particularly at Lewis Point
Mr. Miller has taken one specimen, a fall migrant, at Peterboro.
11. Chordeiles virginianus. Nighthawk. — "Of rare occurrence,"
and only two records given by Mr. Embody. The bird is a common
summer resident in the vicinity of Oneida and by Oneida Lake ; it may
be heard almost any early evening. Mr. Miller regards it as "not uncom-
mon at Peterboro."
12. Carpodacus purpureus. Purple Finch. — Given as "very uncom-
mon during the breeding season," which is far from true for northern
Madison County. As a migrant it is tolerably abundant, but onlv a com-
paratively small number remain through the summer. I have never dis-
covered a ncst.^
i^ Loxia curvirostra minor. American Crossbill. — Mr. Miller
reports this to be found at Peterboro throughout the summer. Mr.
Embodv's latest record is for Mav is» but it is said that the "birds may
appear at almost any time during the year."
14. Ammodramus savannarum passerinus. Grasshopper Sp.kr-
ROW. — Mr. Kmhody is quite correct in regarding this as "not an uncom-
mon summer resident." In tact where it does occur it is tolerably com-
mon ; but it was unknown from this district up to July 5, 1895. (See
Auk, \\\\ 227, 1897, and XVII, 178, 1900). It is nearly as common at
> At Thousand Island Park, Jefferson County, last summer, the }*arple
Finches were very common and were observed to sing freely during the firet
two weeks of July, the length of a visit.
^°w^] Maxon, Birds of Madison County, N, Y. 265
the Savnnnah Sparrow. At Peterboro, however, Mr. Miller took only
one specimen during ten years' collecting.
15. Zonotrichia albicollis. White-throated Sparrow. — Given in
the list onlv as a "common transient visitant." Mr. Miller has found it
breeding at two stations near Peterboro ; and I have observed it to be
common in shrubby half-cleared ground near Oneida Lake.
16. Junco hyexnalis. Junco. — Recorded by Mr. Embody only as a
visitant. Mr. Miller observes that the bird breeds "between Peterboro
and Morrisville," as he has seen young scarcely able to fly. I have
observed individuals on the hills near Oneida well along in May.
17. Melospiza lincolni. Lincoln's Sparrow. — Mentioned by Mr.
Embody only in his hypothetic list. Mr. Miller reports having taken a
specimen at Peterboro during spring migration.
18. Pipilo erythrophthalmus. Towhee. — Not mentioned. A single
specimen was taken during spring migration near Oneida by Mr. Percy
Klock, and Mr. Miller also took one at Peterboro. Mr. Egbert Bagg and
the writer found the Towhee resident in low woods near Oneida Lake in
Oneida County several years ago (see Auk, XVII, 178, 1900), and there is
no doubt that the bird breeds also in similar situations a little farther
along the shore within the limits of Madison County.
19. Progne subis. Purple Martin. — "Rarely seen," etc. Breeds at
Oneida and seems to be holding its own against the English Sparrows.
I took a set of 4 eggs from an electric arc lamp at Oneida, July 12, 1895.
20. Stelgidopteryx serripennis. Rough-winged Swallow. — Said to
be "rarely seen," and three records given. According to Mr. Miller it is
a "not uncommon summer resident near Peterboro."
21. Vireo flavifrons. Yellow-throated Vireo. — "Listed as a not
uncommon summer resident." Common in northern portion of the
county where I have observed several nests. (See Osprey, New Series, I,
37-39» 1900)
22. Vireo solitarius. Blub-headed Vireo. — Given by Mr. Embody
only in the hypothetic list. Mr. Miller states that it is commoai at Peter-
boro during migrations and that a few remain throughout the summer.
i"^. Mniotilta varia. Black and White Warbler. — "Common
transient visitant." Mr. Miller calls it a common breeder at Peterboro.
24. Dendroica rara. Cerulean Warbler. — "Rare summer resi-
dent," etc. There are earlier records than Mr. Embody 's. See Auk, XVII,
178, 1900, where is recorded the discovery of a colony on the Stockbridge
West Hill. I have often visited this colony. As late as July 22 (1902)
many of the birds were still in song. Mr. Miller has taken a single
specimen at Peterboro.
25. Dendroica blackbumiae. Blackburnian Warbler. — Given only
as a "common transient visitant." Mr. Miller states that the Black-
burnian is "tolerably common " at Peterboro; and I have found it to be a
regular but rather rare summer resident among hemlocks in mixed woods
on the Stockbridge East Hills.
266 Maxon, Birds of Madisom County, N. Y. [ ^JJJ
26. Dendroica virens. Black-throatbd Green Warbler. — Re-
corded as *' fairly common during migrations." It is, however, a not
uncommon summer resident among the hemlocks in several localities in
the northeastern part of the county. Mr. Miller states that it is common
at Peterboro.
27. Dendroica palmarum. Palm Warbler. — Mentioned only in
hypothetic list. Mr. Miller calls it a not uncommon migrant at Peter-
boro.
28. Geothlypis ag^s. Connecticut Warbler. — Not listed. A rare
fall migrant at Peterboro, according to Mr. Miller.
29. Geothlypis Philadelphia. Mourning Warbler. — Given aii **a
rather rare transient visitant. Occasionally seen during the summer.*'
According to Mr. Miller it breeds rather commonly at Peterboro. I find
it in high woods on the Stockbridge East Hills.
30. Icteria virens. Chat. — Not listed. Mr. Miller has taken a single
specimen at Peterboro.
31. Wilsonia mitrata. Hooded Warbler. — "Rare. Two individ-
uals seen May 29, 1900, one of which was captured, now in the writer's
collection." The Hooded occurs as a regular (breeding) summer ref^ident
in the woods with the Cerulean on the Stockbridge West Hill where I
found it first in 1S96, subsequently in 1898 and 1900. (See Auk, WH.
17S, 1900.) Two specimens were taken ; one, June 24, 1898, which i^ in
my own collection ; a second, adult female, June 15, 1900, now in the
U. S. National Museum collection (No. 1 72461). Upon one of my visits
in 1900 a partially fledged bird was seen with one parent. On July 22,
1902, an adult bird in song was seen again in the same restricted area
where the previous ones were observed. Altitude about 1250 feet.
32. Wilsonia canadensis. Canadian Warbler. — Put down as **nt>i
uncommon during migrations." Should be given as a not uncommon
summer resident. Mr. Miller calls it common at Peterboro; but I h.nve
summer records from only two stations, both not far south of Oneida.
33. Toxostoma rufum. Hrown Thrasher. — Mr. Embody record*
a single specimen. The bird is rather rare in the northern part of the
county, being most often seen in the lowlands toward Oneida Lake. Mr.
Miller calls it an extremely rare migrant at Peterboro.
34. Certhia familiaris americana. Brown Creeper. — Mr. Embod\'<
records indicate that it breeds near Hamilton, and according to Mr. Miller
it breeds at Peterboro.
35. Hylocichla guttata pallasii. Hermit Thrush. — Given only as a
common transient visitant, which would be my verdict. Mr. Miller, hon-
ever, found it breeding commonly at Peterboro.
36. Hylocichla alicse. GRAV-tiiEEKED Thrush. — Given only in the
hypothetic list. Mr. Miller states that it is not an uncommon migrant at
Peterboro.
^^w ^] Stone, Winter Crow Life in Delaware Valley, 267
NOTES ON WINTER CROW LIFE IN THE
DELAWARE VALLEY.
BY WITMER STONE.
Some years ago Messrs. Samuel N. Rhoads, Henry W. Fowler,
and the writer became interested in collecting data relative to the
winter habits and distribution of Crows in the lower Delaware
Valley, especially with regard to the location of their roosts and
the direction of their morning and evening lines of flight. As
often happens circumstances prevented the completion of our
work, and our notes have remained for a long while untouched.
Upon looking them over with a view to continuing the main line
of investigation I find some correlative material bearing upon the
winter life of the crows of the vicinity of Philadelphia which,
seems worthy of publication, and I present it here with due
acknowledgments to my colleagues for their valuable aid in gath-
ering the information together.
The immediate vicinity of the Delaware River, from some dis-
tance north of Philadelphia all the way to the bay, is a great ren-
dezvous for winter crows. To the passengers on the ferryboats
they are a familiar sight, as they mingle with the Herring Gulls,
flapping low over the water to pick up such scraps as may go
floating by or in more severe weather alighting on the grinding ice
cakes, and walking about where the pack has been frozen solidly
together.
On the broad meadows which line the shores of the river, both
above and below the city, crows abound during the daytime and
walk about in search of food until it is time to seek their roosts
on the New Jersey side of the river, when the long straggling
flights may be seen winging their way homeward, sometimes in the
bright glow of a winter sunset, at others in the teeth of a blinding
storm, but always stubbornly heading for the particular roosting
ground that generations of ancestors have used before them.
It seems a pity that a bird whose habits present such an inter-
esting and unique field for study should be subject to persecution,
especially since the Department of Agriculture has shown that his
good deeds in the destruction of insects quite equal his depreda-
268 Stone, Winter Craw Life in Delaware Valley, \ y^
tion and that if not positively beneficial he is at least '* on the
fence. " Where the law does not stand in the way, however, man
usually tries every path that leads to wealth and some enterprising
individuals have, from time to time, made a fair profit by trapping
these poor hungry winter crows to be used in lieu of pigeons in
trap shooting contests.
In severe weather, when the ground is white with snow, the
crows have a harder time than ever to secure a living, and hunger
makes them comparatively tame, so that they fearlessly approach
barn-yards, refuse dumps, and any apparent source of food. It is
at such times that the trappers successfully ply their trade.
A piece of ground conveniently near a strip of woodland or fence
row, and sufficiently cleared and open to attract the attention of the
crows and allow free use of the net, is selected. A rough shelter
is constructed for the concealment of the trapper, and near by a
spring-pole about fifteen feet in length, is planted at such an
angle that the free end is only about four feet from the ground.
A similar pole is planted about forty yards off ; between these and
some distance behind them a row of stakes is driven into the
ground, to which the net is attached. These are also provided
with trigger releases which restrain the free edge of the net until
the spring poles are liberated. The net is an ordinary ^had sein,
fourteen yards long and thirteen feet wide, and is attached to the
spring poles at either end. When set for action the spring poles
are bent back and the net is restrained by the triggers. It is then
quite inconspicuous and can be almost entirely concealed by a
sprinkling of grass. Pieces of horse flesh, which is preferred for
bait on account of its toughness, are now scattered along between
the ix)les and at the proper time the triggers and poles are simul-
taneously set free by a jerk on a rope that is held by the trapper,
and the feeding crows are immediately covered and entangled in
the meshes of the net.
Trapping is begun in November and continued until March
whenever the conditions are favorable ; one man often secures as
many as five hundred birds in a season, and it is estimated that
at least two thousand crows have been killed in one year to test
the marksmanship of Philadelphia's trap shooters. The birds arc
sprung singly from ordinary pigeon traps at twcnt)- to twenty-five
^*J*^^^] Stone, IViM^r Crow Life in Delaware Valley, 269
yards rise, the tails being docked about two inches to allow free
action in the trap. The crows * get off ' more deliberately than
pigeons but their flight is more erratic so that they prove harder
to hit. About twenty per cent, usually escape from the grounds
though many of these are badly wounded, and probably not five
per cent, survive.
One of the most troublesome factors in crow trapping is the
presence of hawks in the vicinit)' of the nets. These birds abound
along the river marshes in winter, where they find quantities of
Field Mice {Microtus pennsylvanicus) to prey upon and naturally
in severe weather they take to the crow bait quite as readly as the
crows themselves. As long as a hawk is there the crows will not
remain on the ground long enough to justify a cast of the net,
but continue to hover over and mob him until he is fairly settled
at his feast, when they retire to the neighboring trees and await his
departure, which is greeted with a rousing demonstration.
To rid themselves of this nuisance the trappers are compelled to
net a number of hawks, nearly all of which prove to be the Red-
shouldered Hawk (^BuUo lineatus). This fact is interesting, as
previous experience showed that nine tenths of the hawks shot on
the Delaware meadows were the Red-tailed Hawk {B, borealis),
A few of the latter species and one Black Hawk (^Archibuteo /ago-
pus sancti-johannis) have been netted.
Fortunately for the crows trapping can only be carried on
successfully in winters when the ground is covered with snow for a
considerable period. The abundance of the pigeon supply also
materially affects the demand of crows, and these facts do not tend
to draw a great many men to this interesting field of business.
Furthermore, the temporary retirement of the chief crow trapper,
who has been spending some time in jail — on another charge —
has given the birds a respite of late, which we trust will continue.
One of the most interesting facts developed in the investigation
of this crow trapping was that both the Fish Crows {Corvus ossif-
ragus) and Common Crows (C americantis) were caught in the
same net, and that the former species was by no means rare, being
clearly distinguished by both trappers and gunners under the name
of Pigeon Crow and regarded as better for trap shooting than the
larger species, since it was not necessary to * dock ' so much of
the tail to get the birds in the traps.
270 Stone, IVimtcr Crow Life in Delaware ValUy. [^jj
An inspection of the bams and comcribs where the crows were
conRned until sold, showed that about one in five was of the
smaller species. This is of course not an index of the relative
proportion of the two species, but simply of those caught, and
doubtless indicates that the Fish Crow was more susceptible to the
allurements of the trapper than his larger brother. The abundance
of the Fish Crow in winter on the meadows to the north of the dty
is interesting since, so far as Mr. Fowler has been able to ascer-
tain, the species does not nest so far up the Delaware River. On
the I'inicum meadows, below the city, it has frequently been
reported as a summer resident, but careless observers and collec-
tors have more than once confused the two species, and so far as
my personal experience goes such nests as I have examined in
this locality were imquestionably the property of C americanus,
though I am still of the opinion that the Fish Crow breeds their
also, and that a colony of nests in the Lazaretto woods belongs to
the latter species. Farther down the river the Fish Crow undoubt-
edly nests regularly as well as along the New Jersey coast, while
of late years several pairs have occupied tall trees in the small
parks in the heart of Philadelphia. The pair which have been
domiciled in Logan Square, directly opposite the Academy of
Natural Sciences, have been frequently observed and seem to be
quite oblivious to their surroundings, feeding their young on the
lower branches of the trees to the astonishment of the House
Sparrows, and even making depredations upon the disarticulated
skeletons which our taxidermist had put out on the roof to bleach.
Our observations would seem to indicate, that the Fish Crow is
a resident species along the river but that it pushes farther north
along the valley in severe winter than its normal breeding range
extends. That it mingles much more with the Common Crow
than some of the older writers would have us believe seems certain,
although this may apply only to the district under consideration
and similar spots where the ranges of the two overlap.
As the Fish Crow is not a very common species in collections.
Mr. Fowler secured at my request a series of twenty-five specimens,
all of which are now in the Academy's or in my own collection.
The difference in color as compared with the Common Crow and
the increased gloss of the plumage is constant through the whole
^*lw ^] Stone, Wimter Craw Life in Delaware Valley, 27 1
series. In size the largest Fish Crow fails to equal the smallest
Common Crow, though exceptional examples approach more
closely in dimensions of wing than is generally supposed. The
bulk of the specimens, however, differ widely, and emphasize the
distinctness of these two species. Indeed, to my mind it is the
only distinct type of Crow in the United States apart from C
ameruanuSy all the others, even C caurinus^ being apparently geo-
graphic derivatives of the latter. The measurements of twenty-
five specimens are as follows :
Wing, 9-56-11.55 ; average, 10.68 ins.
Culmen, 1.41-1.63; arerage, 1.52 ins.
Bill from nostril, 1.02-1.20; average, i.io ins.
Some of the largest individuals are females, and there does not
seem to be much difference in the average size of the two sexes.
A series of fifteen Common Crows from the same vicinity yields
the following measurements, which will show the comparative
dimensions of the two species as found in the Delaware Valley in
winter.
Wing, 11.60-13.35 ; average, 12.28 ins.
Culmen, 1.75-2.03; average, 1.86 ins.
Bill from nostril, 1.25-1.52; average, 1.34 ins.
The average size of the skulls of the two species is as follows :
C americanusy length, 3.58 ins.; greatest breadth, 1.48 ins.
C. ossifragusy length, 3.03 ins.; greatest breadth, 1.28 ins.
27 2 Sto'S'b.^ Generic Names of North American Owls, Ljuiv
ON THE GENERIC NAMES OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN OWLS.
BY WITMER STONE.
As IS well known, there has been considerable difference of
opinion among ornithologists as to what species of owl should be
regarded as the type of the Linnaean genus Strix, In the
A. O. U. Check-List the question was decided in favor of the Bam
Owl, which consequently stands as Strix flammea. In * The Auk '
for January, 1900, p. 65, the late Dr. Coues raised the claim that
when Brisson, in 1760, divided the Linnaean genus into Strix and
Asio he fixed Strix stridula as the type of the former. This ques-
tion has been before the A. O. U. Committee on Nomenclature
ever since, and it was in the course of investigating into its merits
that I discovered other complications in the nomenclature of our
Owls, which have led to the present paper.
Before entering upon a general discussion of the subject I may
say, that I can find no warrant for Dr. Coues*s claim. Brisson
simply gave generic names to the two groups of owls which
Linnaeus termed (under his genus Strix) ^auricuJata ' and * inauricu-
111 tie ' ; and gave no indication of a type. This fact seems to me
perfectly clear, and were there no other questions involved the
generic names of our owls would remain as at present. Unfor-
tunately, however, such is not the case, and Dr. Coues's further
claim that " the last word on the subject has not yet been said ''
is abundantly proven.
To begin at the beginning : Linnaius, in the loth edition of his
* Systema,' included all the owls known to him in the genus Strix,
arranging them in two groups as follows
AURICULAT/K. InaURICULAT.E.
huluK aluco (:=^fliimmea of XII ed.).
scatuiiaca (doubtful). ftincrca (doubtful).
asio, tiyctea,
ottis. siridiihi,
scops, ulula,
f*as senna.
Vol. XX
1903
J Sto'S'b,^ Generic Nttmes of Nortk American Owls. ^73
These are all recognizable species except scandiaca znd futurea^
which have been usually dropped out of consideration as com-
posite or doubtful.
As already stated, Brisson in 1760 gave names to these two
groups, calling the eared owls Asia and restricting Strix to those
without ears.
In 1799 Cuvier (Lemons d' Anat. Comp., Tab. II) did precisely
the same thing, using the names t?/«xand Strix respectively; and
in 1806 Dumdril (Zool. Analytique, p. 34) again named the eared
owls of Linnaeus, calling them Bubo. •
Hence we have three names coextensive and absolutely synony-
mous— Asio Brisson = Otus Cuvier = Bi4bo Dumeril ; and neither
of the latter can be revived for any part of the original group
included under Asio, />., the auriculatce of Linnaeus (r/! Allen,
discussion of the nomenclature of the genus Dicotyks, Bull. Am.
Mus. Nat. ^ Hist, XVI, 1902, p. 162). This disposes absolutely
of Bubo, artd I had supposed of Otus also, but Dr. Chas. W.
Richmond calls my attention to the fact that Pennant had used
the name Otus long before Cuvier, and upon looking up his
* Indian Zoology,' 1790, p. 34, we find a plate and description of
*' Otus bakkamasna^ The identity of this bird has been somewhat
in doubt, but the majority of writers have regarded it as the small
screech owl of Ceylon and it has been so accepted by Blanford
(Fauna of Brit. Ind., Ill, p. 297) and Sharpe (Hand List of Birds,
I, p. 286), though neither of them seem to have realized that in so
doing they were bound to adopt the generic name Otus for the
Screech Owls.
The identification of Pennant's bird with the Barn Owl, which
has been proposed by some, cannot be upheld, as the description
and size are quite at variance with that species. This, moreover,
would make the Barn Owl the type of Otus and leave the Snowy
Owl as the type of Strix/
In the preface to Pennant's Indian Zoology of 1790 he states
that there waS an earlier edition published by Forster in 1781, but
upon consulting this 1 find the bird under the name Strix
bakkamcena. Both Sherbum and Blanford, however, quote a
still earlier 1769 edition, in which the name Otus is used, so that
we are apparently safe in accepting this as the date of the genus
2^4 Stone, Generic Names of North American Orvls. L hlw
Otus, though I have not personally been able to con3ult this
edition.
The recognition of this early use of Otus fixes the name beyond .
question upon the Screech Owls and cancels the action of Savigny
who, in 1809, established the genus Scops for these birds. It also
avoids the controversy as to whether the use of Scopus Briss., 1 760,
for the Umbrette invalidates Scops of Savigny, a question upon
which American and British authors have long been at variance.
With the Screech Owls asto and scops thus removed from the
genus As to of Brisson we have left only the species bubo and otus.
In 181 5 Rafinesque (Analyse, p. 69) used the name Bubotus,
but Dr. Richmond, who has examined a copy of this rare work in
the Library of Congress, informs me that the name is " merely a
new name or emendation of Bubo Dum^ril/' and consequently falls
with that.
In 1832 Wagler (Isis, p. 122 1) proposed Nyctalops for his new
species N, stygius. This bird is now regarded as congeneric with
''''Asia otus^^ (Linn.) Briss., and removing the latter to the genus
Nyctalops we have left as the type of Asio^ Strix bubo Linn.
It must not be thought that the Great Homed Owls were not
provided with generic names, other than Bubo Dum^ril, which we
have shown to be untenable, for we find three proposed in 1837,
and others later. The former are
Ascalaphia Geoitr., Echo du Monde Savant, III, p. 4. (type A. savii^nii
(icotir. =: Bubo ascalapkus Savign.).
Hcliaptcx Swains., Class. Birds^ II, p. 217 (type S. arciica Swains. = Bttbo
suharctica IIov).
Crrmi Ilodgs., Jour. As. Soc. Bengal, VI, p. 372 (type V. cavraria
lIodgs.=: Otus benfralensia Frankl.).
If my argument is correct, and Strix bubo is by elimination the
type of Asio Brisson, we shall not have to consider these names
at all, but I give them in order to complete the record. Moreover,
they will probably not have to be considered in any case, since
Swainson in the same year (1837) restricted Asio Brisson to the
species bubo and virginianus, bringing us to the same point that I
have reached by elimination.
If my views are adopted no change will be required in the
genera of any of the * earless ' owls, while our * eared ' species
will stand as follows :
^•^•^^1 STOJUfLt Generic Names of North American Owls. 275
Family ASI0NID.«.
r
Genus Nyctalops Wagler, 1832. Tjpe N siygius Wagl.
Asio Auct. {nee Brisson).
Otus Auct. {nee Pennant, nee Cuvier).
366. Nyctalops wilsonianus (Less.)*
367. Nyctalops accipitrinus (Pall.).
Genus Asio Brisson, 1760. Tjpe Strix bubo Linn., by elimination
Otus Cuvier, 1799 {nee Pennant).
Bubo Dum^ril, 1806.
Bubotus Rafin., 1815.
375. Asio virgin ianus (Gmel.).
375<7. Asio v.pallescens (Stone).
375*. Asio V, subarcticus (Hoj).
375f. Asio V. saturatus (Ridgw.).
375</. Asio V. paeifieus (Cassin).
Genus Otus Pennant, 1769. Type O. bakkamcena Penn.
Scops Savigny, 1809.
Megascops A. O. U. Check-List.
373. Otus asio (Linn.).
373«. Otus a. floridanus (Ridgw.).
373^. Otus a. mccalli (Cassin).
373f. Otus a. bendirei (Brewst.).
373</. Otus a. kennicottii (Elliot).
373*. Otus a. maxwellia (Ridgw.).
373^". Otus m. cineraceus (Ridgw.).
373^. Otus a. aikeni (Brewst).
373A. Otus a. macfarlanei (Brewst.).
373.1. Otus trickopsis (Wagler.).
374. Otusflammeola (Kaup).
374rt. Otus flammeola idahoensis (Merriam).
I regret very much to work such a revolution in the nomenclature
of such well-known birds as these owls, but it seems to me after
much careful study that these changes are inevitable if we follow
the rules in our Code of Nomenclature, and I consider the sooner
we have done with a disagreeable job the better.
It will be noticed that the alterations are due entirely to the
discovery of the early use of the generic name Otus by Pennant
and by the enforcement of the rule relating to synonyms in the
case of Bubo Dum^ril. Had Dr. Bowdler Sharpe been aware of
the former and realized the proper treatment of the latter case
when he wrote his excellent review of the owls in 1875 (Ibis, p.
276 STOisTLy Generic Names of North AmericaM Ou'ls, f jlSv
324J he must, I think, have reached the same conclusion that I
have here presented.
A revision such as I have offered will inevitably be severely criti-
cised by those who do not believe in any change in our nomen-
clature, but who do not offer any explanation as to how we are to
arrive at a fixed system of names, without such change. When
they ask, " Are we any nearer to stability than we were ten years
ago ? " I would answer, yes I There are obviously only a certain
number of publications, in which descriptions of genera and spe-
cies occur, and with the invaluable works of reference that Mr.
Sherburn is placing in our hands we shall soon be past the possi-
bility of the resurrection of old names.
The reason that we have to make so many changes at the pres-
ent time is simply because this phase of the subject has only
recently attracted the attention of more than a very few workers.
Why such wholesale criticism should be aimed at the revision of
nomenclature I fail to see, when revision in classification, in any
branch of natural science, is accepted as a matter of course. The
changes in one field, since the time of Linnseus, are just as radi-
cal as in the other. When the anatomy and embryology of each
member of a group is known, the classification will reach a defi-
nite basis ; and when all the published names are found and inter-
preted the nomenclature will likewise be finally adjusted.
However, I fear that explanations will not be of much avail,
except in the case of those who have been brought face to face
with questions of this sort and have been compelled to make a deci-
sion ; and I must confess that with these changes and others
which have been elsewhere proposed in the case of certain of the
earless owls, some of the pages of our Check-List will present a
decidedly unfamiliar appearance. Indeed, there is danger that
their contemplation may result, on the part of some of us, in
actions which, according to Thomas Pennant, are characteristic of
the owls themselves, for he tells us in his quaint * Genera of
Birds* (1781 ) that they are accustomed to wink in the day time,
prey [pray?] in the evening, and snore loudly at night!
^^wof*"^] Brooks, Birds of ike Cariboo District, B. C. 277
NOTES ON THE BIRDS OF THE CARIBOO DISTRICT,
BRITISH COLUMBIA.
BY ALLAN BROOKS.
Plate X,
Desiring to study the fauna of the northern interior of British
Columbia, I spent fifteen months, from June, ic^oo, to October,
1901, in the Cariboo district, a large portion of the time being
devoted entirely to collecting. The first eleven months were
spent in the heavily timbered country in the northern portion of
the district, Quesnelle Mouth, Willow River, and the mountains
southeast of Barkerville. From May, 1901, till the following
October I made my headquarters at the 158-Mile House, in the
southwestern corner of the district, just north of the 5 2d parallel.
Excursions were made from this point to the Chilcotin plateau,
Lac la Hiche and Horsefly River.
The country around Quesnelle, on both banks of the Eraser,
and north to Fort George, is entirely covered with forest, mostly
coniferous, — spruce, balsam, Murray pine and Douglas fir, with
a good deal of birch and poplar. The altitude of the Eraser at
Quesnelle is 1600 feet.
The mountains in this region are mostly low, level plateaus, but
towards Barkerville they merge into the Cariboo Range, rugged and
snow-capped, with timber lii>e at about 5500 feet.
Towards the southern portion of this range the climate becomes
more humid and the valleys, such as the upper Horsefly, possess a
forest growth very similar to that of the coast region, — hemlock,
cedar, Douglas fir, yew, etc., with a heavy growth of underbrush,
red dogwood, devil's club, etc.
The southwestern corner of the Cariboo district, like the
Lilloet district to the southwest, is diversified with a good deal of
open and partially timbered country; the 158-Mile House is
situated on a plateau of about 3000 feet altitude (Carpenter's
Mountain). Here there is a good deal of natural prairie, with
numerous lakes and ponds, and scattered groves of timber and
brush, the fauna and flora having many of the characteristics of
the plains to the east of the Rockies.
278 Brooks, Birds of ike Cariboo DisiHci, B. C. \^}Si
The whole district has a very cold winter climate and a moder-
ately warm summer. Mosquitoes and blackflies swarm, and bird-
nesting in the swamps and woods is generally anything but a
pleasure.
1. Colymbus holtKBllii. HoLr>(£LL*s Grebe.
2. Colymbus auritus. Horned Grebe.
Both these grebes were abundant, breeding on nearlv everv pond and
lake. The larger species wages incessant war upon the smaller one. the
larger birds diving and coming up beneath the smaller ones time and
again to the terror of the poor little fellows, who often desert their ne'*t>
in consequence.
3. Podilymbus podiceps. Pied-billed Grebe. — Rare.
I kept a good lookout for the Western Grebe (.'Eckmopkorus ocri-
dentalis), but never saw one, not even during migrations. Their lino of
migration is probably straight eastward from southern British Columbia,
where they are common.
4. Gavia imber. Loon. — Abundant: the only species of loon
observed.
5. Lams Philadelphia. Bonapartr*s Gull. — The only gull observed
during the breeding season. Breeds in the neighborhood of Qiicsnelle
Lake.
6. Merganser americanus. American Merganser.— Breedin;;
on the streams and the larger lakes but absent from the smaller lake<>
that are devoid of fish.
7. Lophodytes cucullatus. Hooded Merganser. — Scarce.
8. Anas boschas. Mallard.
9. Mareca americana. Baldpate.
10. Nettion carolinensis. Green-winged Teal.
Tiiese three species are all abundant breeders.
11. Querquedula discors. Blue-winged Teal.
I J. Spatula clypeata. Shoveller.
13. Dafila acuta. Pintail.
These three ducks are rather scarce breeders in the neighborhood of
isS-Mile House.
I did not observe the Gadwail, the Cinnamon Teal, nor the Redhead,
which are probably not found north of Lac la Hache.
14. Aythya vallisneria. Canvas-back. — Common breeder. The
nests are bulky platforms of reeds, similar to a Coot's, found generally
on small swampy ponds, away from the larger lakes, where the male."
associate in tlocks. Eggs were taken from 21st of May to 6th June.
15. Aythya marila. Scaup Duck. — Observed only during ii»
migrations.
16. Aythya afBnis. Lesser Scaup Duck. — Abundant, breeding
much later than the Canvas-back or Ring-necked. The nests were
The Auk. Vol. XX.
iu^'^Uhf^
Vol. XX
1903
J Brooks, Birds 0/ ike Cariboo Districts, B. C. ^79
usually in coarse grass, with a waterway, generally a muskrat*s runway,
connecting with the nearest open water. Clutches varied from seven to
eleven eggs each. First eggs taken on 21st June.
17. Aythya collaris. Ring-necked Duck. — A rather scarce
breeder, I was able to take only one set of eggs, evidently a second
laying, as there was no down. This was on the 27th June. The nest
was in a tussock of grass, in eight inches of water ; it was composed of
coarse green grass and arched over with the drooping blades of the
tussock. The nine tggf^ contained small embryos.
Young broods of this species were observed before the Lesser Scaups
{A. affinis) had started to lay. The young in down are very light colored,
resembling the young of the Canvasback and Redhead, and quite dif-
ferent from the dusky, unspotted young of the Lesser Scaup. (See PI. X.)
18. Clangula clangula americana. American Golden-eye. — Com-
mon during migrations, but not observed during the breeding season.
19. Clangula islandica. Barrow^s Golden eve. — A rather scarce
breeder in the neighborhood of 158-Mile House, but common in
La Hache Valley. One set of eggs was taken from a hole in a dead
Douglas fir, fifty feet from the ground, probably the deserted nest of
a flying squirrel. The tree stood about four hundred yards from the
nearest water. The eggs (seven) at this date (17th June) contained large
embryos. I saw another nesting hole but was unable to reach it. The
female brought fourteen young ones out from this.
20. Charitonetta albeola. Buffle-head. — Almost every lake has
one or more pairs of these charming little ducks. Unlike Barrow's
Goldcneye, the nests were always in trees close to, or but a short distance
away from water. These nests were invariably the deserted nesting holes
of flickers, and in most cases had been used several vears in succession bv
the ducks. The holes were in aspen trees, from five to twenty feet from
the ground, and the entrance was not more than three and a quarter
inches in diameter. The number of eggs ranged from two to nine, eight
being the average ; in color they resemble old ivory, without any tinge
of green. I have several times seen the eggs of this duck described as
"dusky green," but these have evidently been the eggs of some species
of Teal. The female Buflflehead is a very close sitter, never leaving the
nest until the hole was sawed out, and in most cases I had to lift the bird
and throw her up in the air, when she would make a bee-line for the
nearest lake, where her mate would be slowly swimming up and down
unconscious of the violation of his home. In many cases the eggs had
fine cracks, evidently made by the compression of the bird's body when
entering the small aperture.
21. Harelda hyemalis. OLD-squAW. — Common on the larger lakes, but
by June they had all gone North, with the exception of a single female
which remained on a small lake near the 158-Mile House throughout the
summer.
22. Histrionicus histrionicus. HARLEqi'iN Duck. — A scarce summer
resident on some of the mountain streams.
280 Brooks, Birds of ike Cariboo District^ B, C. fjoiy
23. Oidemia deglandL White-wingkd Scoter. — Numbers of thc*e
scoters remained on the larger lakes near the I5$-Mile House throughout
the summer, and to all appearances they were paired and breeding, vet I
never found a nest, nor saw any broods of young.
24. Oidemia perspicillata. Surf Scoter. — Seen throughout the
summer but does not breed.
25. Erismatura jamaicensis. Ruddy Duck. — A common breeder.
While watching the curious antics of the males, through a binocular at
very close range, I was struck with the peculiar formation of the head,
there being distinct elevations over each eye resembling those ot a frog.
These were evidently caused by inflation from the inside of the skin.
Young when first hatched are, as might be expected, very large, and dive
for their food, unlike all other young ducks, which take their food from
the surface for several weeks.
26. Branta canadensis. Canada Goose. — Common. This is the
only goose that breeds in Cariboo, Chilcotin, etc. I failed to find any
evidence of the breeding of Hutchins*s Goose, and all residents whom I
questioned asserted positively that they had never seen any of the smaller
geese breeding, though a few may remain through the summer, at> they
do in southern British Columbia, evidently non-breeding birds.
Many sets of the eggs of Canada Geese are taken and set under hen!( ;
these often produce undersized birds, which has led to the statement, so
often made, of the breeding of Hutchins*s Goose in British Columbia.
27. Olor buccinator. Trumpeter Swan. — Swans of this species
breed in northern Chilcotin.
28. Botaurus lentiginosus. American Bittern. — Breeds in ihc
southern portion of the district.
29. Grus mexicana. Sandhill Crane. — Breeds in suitable localiiic".
The smaller species (G". cauadat^is) passes through on migration^ onlv.
30. Rallus virginianus. Virginia Rail.
31. Porzana Carolina. Sora.
32. Fulica americana American Coot.
All three are common and breed.
33. Phalaropus lobatus. Northern Phalaropk. — This phalnrope
may breed in northern Cliilcotin, tiiough I could find no evidence of its
doin*j; so near the 15S Mile House.
34. Gallinago dclicata. Wilson's Snipe. — Common summer resi
dent.
35. Tringa maculata. Pectoral Sandpiper.
36. Tringa minutilla. Least Sandpiper.
These two sandpipers were frequently seen throughout the summei.
but weie evidently non-breeding birds.
37. Tringa bairdii. Baird's Sandpiper.
38. Ereunetes pusillus. Sk.mipalmated Sandpiper.
39. Calidris arenaria. Sanderlinc;.
All were taken at Qiiesnellc during migrations.
^llJ^^l Brooks, Birds of the Cariboo District^ B. C. 28 1
40. Tetanus melanoleucus. Greater Yellow-legs. — Breeding in
mzxiy localities but all efforts to find the nest were unsuccessful, owing to
the extreme watchfulness of the male bird, which kept constant watch
from the extreme summit of some tall spruce. Young were first observed
on 15th June.
41. Helodromas solitarius cinnamomeus. Western Solitary Sand-
piper.— I think the Solitary Sandpiper breeds in the district, as I took
young with the down still adhering to their plumage.
42. Baitramia longicauda. Bartramian Sandpiper. — Frequently
seen on both spring and autumn migrations. Mr. Sidney Williams took
one specimen at Quesnelle and I shot another at the 158-Mile House.
43. Actitis macularia. Spotted Sandpiper. — Common breeder.
44. Numenius longirostris. Long-billed Curlew. — Breeding in
the La H&che valley, but not observed in the Cariboo district proper.
45. Squatarola squatarola. Black-bellied Plover.
46. Charadrius dominicus. American Golden Plover. — Seen only
during fall migrations.
47. ^gialitis vocifcra. Killdeer. — Common, breeds.
4$. Dendragapus obscunis richardsonii. Richardson's Grouse.
— Common in partially wooded country in La Hache valley,
Chilcotin, and at Soda Creek, and again on the summits of the mountains
of the Cariboo Range, but not in the intervening heavily wooded country.
All those secured showed faint traces of a terminal tail bar.
49. Canachites franklinii. Franklin's Grouse. — Abundant in all
suitable localities. Towards the northern portion of the district many
show an approach to typical canadensis.
50. Bonasa umbellus togata. Canadian Ruffed Grouse.
51. Bonasa umbellus umbelloides. Gray Ruffed Grouse.
Most of the Ruffed Grouse of the dibtrictare intermediate between
these two races, but ultra-typical examples of each were taken.
52. Lagopus leucurus. White-tailed Ptarmigan. — The only
Ptarmigan observed. I could find no record of A. rupesirisy although
it occurs further south.
53. Pedisecetes phasianellus columbianus. Columbian Sharp-
tailed Grouse. — Abundant at 158-Mile House; scarce at Ques-
nelle. Those taken at the latter locality show a close approach to
typical phasianellus.
54. Zenaidura macroura. Mourning Dove. — Scarce ; in the south-
em portion of the district only.
55. Nyctala tengmalmi richardsoni. Richardson's Owl. —
Quesnelle.
56. Glaucidium gnoma califomicum. California Pygmy Owl.
— Taken as far north as Willow River.
57. Dryobates villosus leucomelas. Northern Hairy Wood-
PBCKBR. — Common at Quesnelle and in the mountains.
58. Dryobates villosus hyloscopus. Cabanis's Woodpecker.
— Breeding at i58>MiIe House.
282 Brooks, Birds of tkt Cariboo District, B. C. [ J^J
59. Dryobates pubescens homorus. Batchblder*s Woodpeckkr.
— Scarce ; not observed during the winter months.
60. Picoides arcticus. Arctic Thrbe-tobd Woodpecker. — Not
uncommon. As far as could be judged without actual comparison, all
the specimens taken were fully as large as eastern birds. The subspecies
lately described by Mr. Outram Bangs occurs in the Okanagan district to
the southward.
61. Picoides americanus. — Taken from Willow River to Clinton;
breeds throughout this region.
62. Sphyrapicus varius nuchalis. Red-naped Sapsucker. —
Common summer resident.
63. Ceophloeus pileatus. Pilbated Woodpecker. — Resident:
observed as far north as Willow River.
64. Colaptes auratus. Flicker.
65. Colaptes cafer coUaris. Red-shafted Flicker.
In the neighborhood of the 158-Mile House both species occur and
interbreed. From one nest hole I took seven nestlings, which varied
from typical cafer collaris to nearly typical auratus.
66. Cypseloides niger. Black Swift. — Observed in the southern
portion of the district.
67. Selasphorus alleni. Allen*s Hummingbird. — Breeding near
158-Mile House.
68. Stellula calliope. Calliope Hi;.mmingbird. — Breeding in the
mountains west of Clinton in the Lilloet district.
69. Bmpidonax traillii alnorum. Alder Flvcatciier. — Breeding
birds taken at Qiiesnelle were closer to alnorum than to typical
traillii \ the latter is the species breeding in the southern portion of the
district.
70. Otocoris alpestris leucolaema. Pallid Horned Lark. —
Breeding above timber line near Barkerville. The spotted young are
darker in coloration than would be expected from the color of the adult.
71. Otocoris alpestris merrillii. Diskv Horned Lark. — Breeding;
on Chilcotin plateau.
72. Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus. Yellow-headed Blackhird.
— Noticed only at 158-Mile House, as a straggler.
73. Carpodacus cassini. Cassin's Pirple Finch. — Summer resi-
dent at Soda Creek, and probably also at Qiiesnelle.
7^. Leucosticte tephrocotis. Gray-crowned Leccostictr. — Breed-
ing above timlnrr line near IJarkerville. The young were fullv fledged
the last week in July.
75. Leucosticte tephrocotis littoralis. Hephirn's Lelvosticte.—
After identifying the typical species as the species breeding in the dis-
trict, I was surprised to find littoralis the common winter visitant around
Quesnelle, where no tephrocotis were then seen.
76. Acanthis homemannii exilipes. Hoary Redp<»ll. — I took
one nearly typical example at Quesnelle, and also have several taken by
Mr. Sidney Williams at that place.
^°w *] Brooks, Birds of the Cariboo District, B. C, 283
77. Pooecete» gramineus. Vesper Sparrow. — The Vesper Spar-
rows of Cariboo seem closer to the typical species than to either of the
subspecies affinis or confinis. They were common at 158-Mile House, and
were also breeding at timber line near Barkerville.
78. Ammodramus sandwichensis ? — The Savanna Sparrows of
Cariboo belong to the large, small-biljed race, found throughout the
interior of British Columbia, and are quite distinct from the small gray
form breeding in the Lower Fraser Valley and generally identified as
alaudinns. I suspect the former is closer to alaudinus and that the latter
is an undescribed subspecies.
79. Spizella monticola ochracea. Western Tree Sparrow. — Breed-
ing near Barkerville.
80. Spizella breweri. Brewer*s Sparrow. — Two males taken at
158-Mile House, 3d July, 1901.
81. Melospiza lincolni striata. Forbush's Sparrow. — Tolerably
common breeder; one set of five eggs taken at 158-Mile House, 5th June.
82. Ampelis gamilus. Bohemian Waxwing. — Breeding from 158-
Mile House northward. I arrived at Quesnelle too late for eggs, but
kept a sharp lookout for Waxwings the following spring at 158-Mile
House. 1 first noticed them there on nth June, when 1 came across a
small flock and shot one which proved on dissection to be a female about
to lay. On returning to the same spot I found the Waxwings, consisting
of a colony of five pairs of birds, still there, and soon discovered a nest in
a Murray pine, near the end of a limb and about twenty-five feet up, this
then (i2th June) contained two eggs. On the 15th 1 took this set, which
then consisted of four eggs. The nest was loose and bulky, composed of
Usnea moss, dry grass and weed stems, and lined with fine material, with
a few green aspen leaves in the lining, no doubt to render the eggs less
conspicuous. On the 26th June 1 carefully looked over all the trees in
the neighborhood with my binocular, and found three more nests, all in
tall Douglas fir trees ; two of these 1 was able to climb to ; each contained
four eggs within a few days of hatching. The nests were similar to the
first but without the green aspen leaves, probably due to the fact that the
nests were better concealed from above. I was unable to reach the fourth
nest, nor could I find that of the remaining pair of birds.
83. Ampelis cedrorum. Cedar Waxwing. — Not observed at 158-
Mile House, but found breeding at Quesnelle, where it evidently laid its
eggs later than the larger species.
84. Helminthophila celata. Orange-crowned Warbler. — A scarce
summer resident; specimens of old and young birds showed this to be
the typical celata and not lutescens.
85. Helminthophila pereg^ina. Tennessee Warbler. — This was a
common breeder at 158-Mile House, where its sharp insistent song was to
be heard from every copse in the partially wooded district. An account
of its nesting has already been given in * The Auk ' for January, 1902 (Vol.
XIX, pp. 88, 89).
284
Brooks, Birds of the Cariboo Dtstrict, B. C. F jjjj
86. Dendroica auduboni. Audubon's WARbLER. — Tolerablv com-
mon breeder.
87. Dendroica maculosa. Magnolia Warbler. — Several seen at
Quesnelle during fall migration.
88. Dendroica striata. Black-poll Warbler. — I shot a Black-poll
Warbler in the first plumage at Qiiesnelle but was unable to find it in the
thick brush. I am very well acquainted with the species and am positi\e
of the identity, as when first seen the bird was within five feet of mc\ und
I had a good look at it.
89. Sieurus noveboracensis notabilis. Grinnell's Water-thru s 11.
— Breeding at Quesnelle, and less commonlv at 158-Mile House.
90. Setophaga niticilla. American Redstart. — Breeding through-
out the district.
91. Galeoscoptes carolinensis. Catbird. — Breeding as far north as
Soda Creek.
92. Regulus calendula. Ruby-crowned Kinglet. — Breeding near
isS-Mile House. On the nth June I found a nest in a small spruce not
four feet high; the nest was close to the stem and about two feet from
the ground ; it was a very deep cup, almost a vertical cylinder. The
sitting bird must have been entirely concealed. It contained five egg**, a
sixth imperfect one was sticking in the foundation of the nest ; it had
evidently been pushed through the lining and a fresh floor built over it.
The owners were raising a great outcry over the intrusion of a wander-
ing brood of Whiskey Jacks ; two grouse feathers were carefully put over
the entrance to the nest, which made me think that it had been ritlcd by
the jays and the lining pulled out. "
93. Hylocichla ustulata swainsoni. Olive-backed Thrush. — A
common breeder from Clinton to Qiiesnelle.
94. Hylocichla guttata pallasii Hermit Tiirumi. — This was the
form of Hermit Thrush occurring at Quesnelle; a skin from I5iy-Mile
House seems closer to the typical form.
^ w^^ J Clark, Habits of Certain Venezuelan Birds. 285
NOTES ON THE HABITS OF CERTAIN VENEZUELAN
BIRDS.
BY AUSTIN H. CLARK.
In *The Auk' for July, 1902 (Vol. XIX, pp. 258-267), I
published a list of the birds of Margarita Island, Venezuela, based
on a collection made by myself in that locality in the summer of
190 1. During my stay on the island, as well as while at various
towns on the mainland, I took copious notes on the habits of the
different species, which lack of space prevented my giving, at that
time, in as much detail as I would have desired. In view of the
fact that so few people ever visit this part of the world, or ever
see these birds under the conditions which pertain there, I shall
take this opportunity of selecting the most interesting from among
them, and giving a brief sketch of their peculiarities, treating them
in the order in which they were given in the list.
The Booby Gannet {^Sula sula Linn.) was one of the commonest
sea-birds at the time of my visit. The first were pbserved far
out in the Caribbean ; and on nearing the South American coast,
little companies of half a dozen or so became rather frequent.
But in no place did I see them so abundant as in the channel
between Margarita and the mainland, and, at certain times, about
Cartipano. . They seemed to approach the land solely for the
purpose of feeding, after which they withdrew to open water.
Just off Cartipano there was a certain spot to which every day
came hundreds of sea-birds of many species to fish. Over one
half of this congregation were common Brown Pelicans {Felecanus
fuscus Linn.), and most of the rest were these gannets. Overhead
soared a score or more Frigate Birds {Fregata aquila Linn.), while
various gulls and terns composed the remainder. All the larger
members of this vast flock acted in perfect unison, wheeling about
until a sufficient altitude was obtained, all diving with a great
splash, then all slowly rising again to repeat the performance.
Every now and then a Frigate Bird would come swooping down
upon some hapless gull. I was much puzzled, at first, to find a
plausible explanation for the fact that, day after day, the birds
collected in practically the same spot to feed. The water there
286 Clark, HahiU of Ctrtaim V!tmesmelam Birds. ff^
LJ«iy
was fully as deep as in the surrounding parts, and, from the land,
no difference whatever was discernible. I thought I had found a
possible clue to the mystery one day, while I was watching some
boys fishing off the end of the wharf. Every few minutes some
fish or other, most often a sea-catfish {Galackikys) would rise to
the surface, feebly struggling, to be almost instantly gobbled by
some watchful gull or Frigate Bird. I obtained a couple of these
fish, but could find no marks whatever on them to indicate in
what manner they had been disabled. The inhabitants told me
that at certain times fish run ashore here by the cait-load, and
say it is due to the larger fish driving them in ; but the United
States vice-consul at Cariipano, Sefior Orsini, believes that the
real cause is the escape of sulphurous fumes through some crevice
in the sea bottom, tainting the water so as to make it poisonous
for the fish, which, to escape death from suffocation, run ashore.
As the whole country about the town is very rich in sulphur, such
an explanation seems highly probable ; and it may well be that
under the spot where the sea-birds congregate, coming to it from
miles up and down the coast, there is some sulphur spring
or temporary opening slowly giving out some volcanic gas or
other which disables the fish. Unfortunately I could not visit the
spot to test the truth of my theory; but I took several catfish
which I found one day washing up on the beach, and carried them
to a salt lagoon, entirely cut off from the sea. When placed in
this, they immediately swam to the bottom, and I saw them no
more.
Single boobies may often be seen fishing in company with
solitary pelicans, imitating in every way the actions of their larger
companions, diving at the same time, and rising simultaneously.
Mr. Outram Bangs has suggested to me that perhaps the booby.
being smaller and more active, finds a good fare in the fish which
the uncouth pelican fails to catch. Just before dark, the gannets
retreat to the channel between Margarita and the mainland, and
fly about, uttering a peculiar note midway between a caw and a
quack. They are unsuspicious, and pay no attention whatever to
a boat, resembling pelicans in this respect ; but they are not so
readily caught by means of a hook and line as the latter. Directly
east of Margarita there is a large rock, rising to a considerable
^**i^^l Clark, Habits of Certain Venezuelan Birds. 287
height above the surface of the sea. My attention was drawn to
it from the fact that the few White Boobies (? Sula piscator Vieill.)
seen seemed to come from that direction. An examination of this
rock in early spring might yield interesting results in regard to
the breeding of many of the sea-birds of this region.
A bird which claims our attention from its great abundance
and large size, is the Black Vulture {Catharista urubu Vieill.).
You are almost never out of sight of one, while they congregate
by thousands about the cities, soaring overhead, or perched on
the house-tops. The poorer quarter of Caricas is a favorite
rendezvous for these birds, attracted thither, doubtless, by the
unrivaled assortment of foul odors to be found there, as well as
by the prospects of rich and bounteous repasts. Near Cartipano
they were strangely scarce, due to the generally clean and whole-
some condition of the town. On Margarita they were quite
common, soaring about over the hillsides, generally keeping near
the ground, and collecting by the score on the beaches to feed on
the dead dogs which were continually floating in, as a result of a
war of extermination made on canines during my visit. They are
quarrelsome birds, using both claws and beak on an adversary ;
and I once saw one fatally hurt by others in a fight over the eyes
of a dog which had just washed up on the beach near Porlamar.
In the town of Port-of-Spain, on the English island of Trinidad,
where * corbeaus ' are strictly protected by law, they are espe-
cially abundant, and may be seen at all times, walking about the
streets, as tame as are English Sparrows in our cities. In fact,
so highly do the people of Trinidad esteem the vultures as
scavengers, that many crimes which are regarded as serious in
our ideas of justice are punished less severely than the killing or
injuring of one of these birds. In Port-of-Spain it is a common
sight to see a vulture with one of its feet crippled from having
been stepped on or run over while engaged in a contest with
others over a bit of offal.
Perhaps the most characteristic bird of the coast region of
Margarita, certainly the one which most surely claims the attention
of the traveler unused to the American tropics, is the Parrakeet
(Conurus aruginosus Linn.). One is never out of hearing of their
incessant noise while near the coast, and little fiocks of a dozen
288 Clark, Habits of Ctrtaim Verngzueiam Birds. [ f^
to twenty are continually passing and repassing. They have two
traits which are more or less common to all the group: they
become instantly quiet and motionless on alighting, and are
therefore very hard to locate in a tree; and they show great
solicitude for a comrade in distress. I had been on Margarita a
couple of weeks before I was able to secure a specimen, in spite
of their abundance, so restless are they ; but at last I succeeded,
by dint of skilful manceuvreing, in wounding one, which came
fluttering down, square onto a 'tuna' bush, on which it was
impaled, struggling and screeching. The remainder of the flock,
about a dozen in all, immediately descended, and hovered about
their unfortunate companion, some alighting on the g^und, and
others in a neighboring thorn tree, displaying as much anxiety as
a robin does, when, some intruder is in the vicinity of her nest.
In fact, so unsuspicious were they, and so heedless of my presence.
that I secured eight and could have got others, had I been able
to care for them properly.
Perhaps I might add parenthetically an item in regard to these
eight parrakeets, which illustrates one of the inconveniences of
tropical collecting. I took them back to £1 Valle, the little town
in which I was staying, together with four Burrowing Owls
{Speotyto brachyptcra Richm.), a White-tailed Buzzard (Buteo
albicaudatus Vieill.), and a number of shore-birds and terns. As
I had had no food since early morning (it was then the middle of
the afternoon) and had passed a particularly trying day, walking
many miles over shadeless, scorching sand, I thought that 1 would
eat a light repast and take a short nap before skinning my
trophies. In about half an hour I arose, and was much interested,
as well as surprised, to see a long line of feathers, green, brown,
gray, and white, moving along close to the wall, and disappearing
into a hole. Investigation revealed the fact that the motive force
behind each feather was a small ant. A hasty examination of my
specimens showed me that seven of my parrakeets were bO
denuded as to be useless, all the owls were ruined, and the water
birds were so greasy as to be unfit for preservation ; the hawk,
also, had begun to decay. After this rather severe experience, I
never rested until the results of my day's collecting had been put
in order, and out of the reach of these interesting, but obnoxious
insects.
^**'W^] Clark, Habits of Certain Vtnexuelan Birds. 289
In the forest, replacing the parrakeet of the coast region, we get
the large green Amazonian Parrot. This bird is common, and
very noisy, its cry resembling the word hro^ by which name it is
known to the natives. When flying, from its great breadth of wing, it
seems to lack both head and tail, being apparently of the same
width from one wing tip to the other. Although of some size, it
is a difficult bird to see, owing to its color, and its adroitness at
concealing itself. If it were not for its continuous racket, it would
often escape detection.
At Cartipano I had the opportunity of observing some very small
parrakeets, about the size of an English sparrow. They were
regular visitors in the courtyard of the hotel, and could be seen
occasionally in the outskirts of the town. Their habits were quite
sparrow-like, both in searching for food, and when flying. I was
informed here, and had it confirmed at Trinidad, that they were
abundant a few miles back from the coast. There is a more or
less traveled route from Cartipano to Ciudad Bolivar, passing
through the barren hill region of the coast, and then crossing the
great "wilderness" which borders the Orinoco. Along this trail,
large mammals of many species are common, such as the jaguar,
puma, and ocelot, and macaws, toucans, many parrots, and numbers
of other birds are abundant. From what I was able to learn, this
would be a most interesting, as well as profitable trip for some
ornithologist with leisure and an inclination for new experiences.
It takes a little over two weeks, and is performed by means of
mules and burros. The United States consul at La Guaira told
me that, had he a knowledge of taxidermy, he could do a great
deal for science by preserving the many curious mammals and
birds which were brought to him out of this little explored region.
We have no bird, which, for pure foolishness and general lack
of spirit, can be compared with the Two-banded Puff-bird {Bucco
bicinctus Gould). Resembling somewhat, with its large beak and
dark breast bands, a clumsy kingfisher, it can be approached very
closely without taking alarm ; and when it does fly, it merely goes
to the nearest available tree or bush and awaits the second approach
of the intruder. Even when shot at, it flies only a few yards, and
then alights, inviting its pursuer to try again. Sometimes it does
not fly at all, but remains stupidly staring at the cause of the
2QO Clark, Habits of Certain Ventxutlan Birds, F j^J
disturbance, until you either take pity on its idiocy, or kill it. I
have shot two of them, perched near together, the second not being
moved in the slightest degree by the death of the first Some-
times, indeed, when out collecting with native boys, I have refused
to shoot a puff-bird, whereupon they would attack it with stones,
on a few occasions actually succeeding in killing it without caus-
ing it to take alarm. This bird is provided with a couple of blunt
spurs on its wrists, with which it might possibly give one an
unpleasant surprise ; but I never saw an individual attempt to use
them, as when wounded, no matter how slightly, they always seem
quite resigned, and do not struggle as would a robin or blue- jay
under similar circumstances.
Bonaparte's Woodpecker {Meiaturpts subeUgans Bon.) is an
abundant bird on Margarita, and one can almost always hear it at
a greater or less distance. Its cry is a loud rattle, peculiarly
harsh and grating, which gets to be quite monotonous on short
acquaintance. In spite of its abundance, I had a hard time
getting specimens, as it seems to be difficult to kill ; so much so,
in fact, that it was one of the last birds added to my list. Their
nests are commonly constructed high up in the cocoanut palms.
The little Buff-breasted Hummingbird {Doh-romya pallidii
Richm.) is sure to force itself upon one's attention by means of
its strikingly loud voice. Just before dark, their notes, with a
peculiar metallic quality, can be heard coming from the thick
scrub on the hillsides. A close approach reveals the songster,
perched upon some prominent twig. Here he sits, until some
rival flies up and drives him off. He generally has not long to
wait, as these, in common with many other hummingbirds, are
very pugnacious.
During my stay on the island, I discovered a nest of Alice's
Hummingbird {Amazilia alicUe Richm.), neatly constructed after
the manner of the red-eyed vireo ; but while I was engaged in
getting some means by which to reach it, my native companions,
thinking I had left it, took the opportunity of testing their skill at
stone-throwing, with the result that the nest was totally destroyed,
and the bird killed. The boys also found some nests of .\tala's
Emerald {C/tlorosti/bon carihbica Lawr.), but I was not fortunate
enough to do so. The birds were, in two cases, readily captured.
^ W^T Clark, Habits of Certain Vtntzuelan Birds. 29 1
Of all the feathered tribe on the island, the Lance-tailed
Manakin {Cheiroxiphia lanceolata Wagl.) seemed, to me the most
pleasing and generally attractive. Occurring in the mountain
forest, its clear whistle is a distinctive feature of this part of the
country. The natives call it "tintoro" which is a very good
rendering of its note ; the first syllable being moderately high, the
next medium, with a rising inflection, the last low. Owing to the
thick undergrowth and miserable footing in the deep woods on
Margarita, I had some trouble at first to secure specimens, as
everything naturally fled at my painfully noisy approach, until I
tried imitating their song, which was very successful. I found
two nests in the forest, both about five feet from the ground, one
built after the manner of an orchard oriole, and the other a loose
structure like that of a rose-breasted grosbeak. Both contained
four eggs, resembling those of a scarlet tanager, but somewhat
lighter in color. As no birds could be found in their vicinity, I
did not disturb them ; but from Capt. Robinson's description of a
nest of this species which he found at La Guaira, I judged that
one of these, if not both, belonged to this bird.
A surprise is in store for the novice when he first meets with
the Barred Ant-shrike (Thamnophilus doliatus Linn.). One day,
shortly after my arrival, while wandering about in the deep woods,
I heard a cawing in the distance. Hoping to add some jay or
other corvine bird to the fauna of the island, I carefully crept to
the spot whence the sound proceeded, only to find that a solitary
ant-shrike had been making all the disturbance. These birds sit
very erect, resembling, with their long crests, our cedar waxwing.
The Creeper {Dendropkx longirostris Richm.), colored after the
fashion of the Common Dipper (Cinclus cinclus Linn.) is a ver)^
different bird in life from what one supposes from an examination
of specimens in collections. As a rule they are mounted in
museums on T perches, which gives them, except for their beaks,
the general appearance of some peculiar thrush. But in reality,
they never, as far as my experience goes, assume that position, act-
ing more nearly like large nuthatches than anything else. Their
cry is a rattle like that of the belted kingfisher, but harsher and
more grating. They nest in the post-cactus.
One of the most brilliant of the common birds was the large
\
202 Ci^KRK, Habits of Certain Ven€MU€iam Birds, xASf
oriole known as the Troupial (Icterus icterus Linn.). They were
particularly noticeable in the hot coast r^on, where they were a
welcome offset to the discouraging presence of the black vulture.
Their loud but cheerful song consists of three Motes, the first
rather low, the second high, and the third intermediate. The
word '^troupial" accented on the middle syllable is a good
onomatopoetic rendering of it. I was unable to find their nests.
Another common bird, resembling ther troupial in many ways,
although less energetic, is the Margaritan Oriole {Icterus xantk-
omus heliocides Clark) . This bird has precisely the same notes as the
other but less loud, and pitched a trifle higher. The males seemed to
me to be considerably brighter and more strongly orange than any
I had ever seen in collections, an observation which was found to
be true on comparing my specimens with others from different
localities. Their nests are commonly seen constructed after the
manner of those of our common oriole, and placed near the tip
of the long cocoanut fronds.
The lagoons bordering the island, especially a few miles to the
eastward of Porlamar, formed the abiding place of many shore
birds and terns, while on the edges of the mangrove swamps
herons of many species could be seen. The commonest of the
terns was a large one which I took to be the Sooty Tern (Sterna
fuliginosa Gmel.). This was seen in immense flocks, wheeling
about over the shallow water, showing now black, now white,
according as their white breasts or black backs were visible. I
also met with them afterwards at different places among the West
Indies, but never in such numbers as at Margarita.
One day while on the sandy plain near the coast, my attention
was attracted by a flock of about twenty very large birds, in the
form of a wedge flying in the direction of the lagoon which sepa-
rates the two parts of the island. Their size and actions suggested
geese ; and it occurred to me that perhaps they were flamingoes.
Although these birds have never been recorded from this locality
the central lagoon and mangrove swamp seem to furnish a good
situation for them, and I should not be surprised if at some future
time specimens of them are obtained there.
There was one other problem connected with the bird fauna of
Margarita which I wa* unable to solve. Near the top of a high
Vol. XX
•90s
1 Clark, Habtts 0/ CtrUiiu VemtxutUtH Birds, 293
spur of the central mountain just south of Kl Valle, there was a
large cave, consisting of a spacious chamber, with an entrance
about ten feet in diameter, and two shafts, one leading directly up
through the roof, and the other slanting. The only inhabitants
were a number of small bats (belonging to the genera Peropuryx,
Micronycieris, and Giossophaj^a). The whole Hoor was covered
with the skeletons of small birds and manunals, the larger |)art
being those of the small doves. I recognized also Bonaparte \s
wood|x.'cker among them, and in addition the remains of a murine
opossum (? Mitrmosa robinsoni Bangs) and some small rodent.
The question arose, what brought them there .^ The cave was
high above any place where these forms could be found conunonly,
if at all. and no birds but vultures were seen in the vicinity ;
neither were there any traces of owls having lived here. The
remains must have been accumulating for many years, as in some
places they were over an inch deep, and the ground in front of the
cave was strewn with them.
In spite of the work done in this locality by Capt. Robinson and
myself, there are still several species on the island which neither
of us obtained : and it is to be hoped that, in the near future, some-
one will visit Margarita and make a much more complete list than
we have been able to do.
294 LooMis, Gtografhic VariaUou in N'omtmclaimrt, LJdf
RECOGNITION OF GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION
IN NOMENCLATURK*
BY LEVERETT MILLS LOOMIS.
It seems inborn in the human mind to desire to know the names
of objects, and if the objects are new, new names are invented.
When the South Atlantic States were settled back in 1600, the
English colonists named our Robin after its English namesake —
in their eyes, longing for the familiar things of England, the Robin
of the New World was the Robin of their old home. But in the
Mockingbird they found no European counterpart; they could
give it no onamatopoetic name, for it had the notes of all birds, so
they called it the Mocking Bird. A quaint old writer, who has
hidden his identity under the initials ' T. A.,' and whose tract is one
of the rarest in the long list of Americana, in writing of the birds
of Carolina, says : " Birds the Country yields of differing kinds
and Colours .... For Pleasure, the .... blew bird, which wan-
tonly imitates the various Notes and sounds of such Birds and
Beasts which it hears, wherefore, by way of Allusion, it 's call'd
the Mocking Bird ; for which pleasing Property it *s there esteem 'd
a Rarity."
Later came Mark Catesby, the ornithologist, and proceeded to
give a new name, for the trick that ornithologists have of giving
new names to familiar birds, is an old trick, as old as the trade of
ornitholog}-. This new name for the Mockingbird, which appeared
in Catesby's sumptuous folio, *The Natural Histor}' of Carolina,
Florida, and the Bahama Islands,' was Tttrdus minor cinerechalbus
non miicuhitus,
Turdiis minor cinereo-alhus non maculatus^ however, was not to
be lasting ; a master mind came into the world, an iconoclast.
This image-breaker was Linnaeus, who had genius for system —
his *Systenia Naturx ' reduced ornithology to system. The Mock-
ingbird, still the sweet singer of the Southland, is given a new
^ Read at the special session of the American Ornithologists* L^nion and
Tenth Anniversary of the Cooper (Ornithological Club, San Francisco, May I5,
1903.
Vol XX
1903
1 LooMis, Geographic Variation in Nomenclature, 295
name, Turdus polyglottos ; Turdus the name of the genus and
polyglottos the name of the species.
Along the way cut out by Linnaeus numerous bird students
traveled. Boie in 1826 took the Mockingbird out of the genus
Turdus and put it in a genus of his oWn, giving the genus the name
Mimus^ the species name remaining 2ls poiygiottus ; the whole name
of the Mockingbird thus rehabilitated was Mimus polyglottus. In
1827, Swainson likewise instituted a new genus for the Mocking-
bird, styling it Orpheus,
Vigors, in 1839, in working up the birds obtained by the ship
*Blossom ' in her voyage along the Pacific Coast gave the Mock-
ingbird the specific name leucopterus, coupling it with the generic
name Orpheus^ for he supposed he had discovered a new species
of Mockingbird.
In 1858, Professor Baird thought possibly he had found a long-
tailed Mockingbird in California, and tentatively named it Mimus
caudatus. In 1865, Dr. Coues called the Mockingbird of Arizona
Mimus polyglottus, var. caudatus.
The last author, Dr. Mearns, to deal with the Mockingbird,
tells us in *The Auk ' for January, 1902, that there are two kinds
of Mockingbirds in the United States; namely, Mimus polyglottos
polyglottos^ Mimus polyglottos leucopterus, I fear it will be said that
ornithologists have advanced backward from the binomial Mimus
polyglottus o{ Boie toward the Turdus minor cinereo-al bus non maat-
latus of Catesby.
With partial knowledge of geographic variation, came departure
from the binomial system. Mimus caudatus of Baird was found
to intergrade with the eastern bird and was reduced to Mimus
polyglottus, var. caudatus. Later the leading American ornitholo-
gists agreed to leave out the abbreviation var., and have the pure
trinomial, as in Mimus polyglottos leucopterus. With this change,
the term subspecies came into vogue, supplanting the word variety.
Then followed a period when great series were accumulated, and
subspecies multiplied, and now a large part of the United States
birds bear trinomials — even Catesby is outdone, for he called the
Cardinal by the binomial, Coccothraustes ruber, while in the last
systematic work on American birds the Cardinal has this cogno-
men, Cardinalis cardinalis cardinalis — in short, cardinalis three
times, and out.
2o6 LooMis, Geographic Variation im Komenclaiure. \\^^
The study of specimens has made known geographic variation,
as such study has made known individual variation and variation
in sex, age, and season. Systematic ornithologists have groptrd
their way into the light ; of the sixteen variants, bearing trinomials
among California * swimming birds,' fifteen were first deucribccl
as species.
The Song Sparrow from Petaluma, California, originally de>i--
nated Ammodromus samuelis, has become a sort of classic illu>-
tration of the way the facts of geographic variation have dawned
upon the minds of systematic ornithologists.
Variation in sex and season in like manner has added to the
darkness ; for example, the male and female of Williamson '.^ Sap-
sucker have been placed in different genera, and the winter and
summer plumages of the Marbled Murrelet have each been
described as distinct species.
Nomenclature has been a means in gaining knowledge of varia-
tion. In seasonal and sexual variation it has proved a temp>orary
structure. Is this not also true in geograpliic variation ? Is not
nomenclature (binomial or trinomial) in geographic variation a scaf-
folding to be torn down rather than the edifice that is to abide?
Granting all that is unfolded in the most elastic theories of
evolution concerning incipient species — it matters not whether
they hail from islands where geographic variation breaks down in
individual variation, or whether they be the arliticially selected
sections from regions where the arid passes into the humid — \\e
are still confronted with the question : Is the science of ornithol-
ogy to be advanced or retarded by continuing the recognition of
geographic variation in nomenclature ?
A glance at later American works on ornithology, conlainin;;
life-histories as well as the systematic aspects of the subject,
reveals that variants are often treated in the same manner as full-
Hedged species; both are given a vernacular name, description,
habitat, and biography. For example, the variant of the Murre
occurring on the Pacific is placed on the same footing, in this
respect, as the Tufted Puffin, notwithstanding the hiatus that
separates the Tufted Puffin from all other birds ; the Tufted Puffin
represents complete isolation of a form, the variant of the Murre
variation within the bounds of such an isolated form. Whatever
^*ioc?^l LooMis, Geographic Variation in Nomenclature. ^97
future possibilities there may be in evolution, the Tufted Puffin
and the variant of the Murre are not now of the same rank. We
are to work out the questions of bird life of to-day, not those of
ten thousand years hence. In spite of our boasted advance, we
treat variants under trinomials in the same manner Professor
Baird treated them in 1858 under binomials, fulfilling the adage
that " extremes always meet."
If we deal with the food of birds, we find it convenient to ignore
variants ; the intermediates might be the only individuals with full
stomachs. Thus it happens, that Dr. Judd has lumped all the
Loggerheads in dealing with the food of our Shrikes.^ Turn in
what direction we will in the study of birds upon the basis of
subspecies, intermediates bar the way.
Systematic ornithologists have been forced to seek stability in
nomenclature in the law of priority. From subspecies, however,
there is no refuge, except the opinion of experts, which varies
with the type of mind of the individual expert.^
Mr. Ridgway in the preface to the first part of his * Birds of
North and Middle America * says : " No doubt many of the forms
which the author has recognized as subspecies in the present work
may appear trivial to others, especially those who have not h; d
advantage of the material upon which they are based; but in all
cases it has been the author's desire to express exactly the facts
as they appear to him in the light of the evidence examined, with-
out any regard whatever to preconceived ideas, either of his own
or of others, and without consideration of the inconvenience which
may result to those who are inclined to resent innovations, forget-
ful of the fact that knowledge cannot be complete until all is
known."
Dr. Allen in a review of this work remarks : ^ "Yet it is some-
times possible for slight differences to become magnified and
their importance over-estimated by long and intense consideration
of them — in other words, there is danger of losing one's poise of
* Bull. No. 9, U. S. Dept. Agric, Div. Biol. Surv., p. 20.
* The case is aggravated when the attempt is made to create species from
extremes of geographic variation.
'The Auk, Vol. XIX, p. 102.
298 LooMis, Geographic Variation in Nomenclature. FjuIt
judgment in dwelling upon minute details, which tend thereby-
to assume exaggerated importance."
Dr. Gill reviews the subspecies question as follows : * " There
is a serious taxonomic problem that will confront us in the treat-
ment of North American birds. Our ornithologists very generally
have manifested a disposition to study the variations, of species
and to discriminate the variants as subspecies. There is a ten-
dency in the same direction in other branches of zoology and by
some it has been called the statistical method. It has been ver}-
recently employed in ichthyology. For example, Mr. Walter
Garstang, of Plymouth, appears to have shown that there is an
average of minor characteristics which differentiate the mackerels
of different ranges as distinct races, but he has not deemed it
necessary to name such races. Such studies are valuable and
should not be decried. Nevertheless an instability is introduced
in any group in which undue prominence is given to such varia-
tions which is embarrassing. I do not see any end to such split-
ting, but an interminable number of subspecies looms threatening
in the future. I would suggest that in the new ornithology a ver}*
subordinate rank should be given to the subspecies. The species
might be described in generalized terms, that is, including all the
variants, and the diversification into' subspecies indicated in terse
phraseology immediately after the diagnosis of the common char-
acters."
Better still, if we treat geographic variation not as subspecies,
but as we treat variation in sex, age, season, etc. By pOrsuing
this course we have a stable criterion. It may be rather trying at
the outset, arousing in us feelings akin to superstition, to call all
Song Sparrows Meiospiza cinerea ; nevertheless the geographic
variations ignored ^ are not greater than the sexual variation in
Williamson's Sapsucker and the seasonal variation in the Marbled
Murrelet, once of sufficient import for generic and specific distinc-
tion.
The question is not whether we affirm or deny the existence of
^The Osprey, Vol. HI, p. 92.
* The variation in size in the Song Sparrow b insignificant compared with
the variation in size exhibited in the Canada Goose.
^**iw^] California Meeting of the A. O. U. 299
subspecies; the question is whether a bird name should be an
attempt to express the facts and theories of evolution, or whether
a bird name should be a convenient handle to forms exhibiting no
intergradation, the species of to-day. In trying to manufacture a
nomenclature for birds of remote ages, past and future, are we not
putting an impediment in the way of the study of existing birds ?
What then shall we call the Mocking Bird of the writer of the
old tract on Carolina, the Tardus minor cirureo-albus non maculatus
of Catesby, the Turdus polyglottos of Linnaeus, the Mimus polyglot-
ius of Boie, the Mimus polyglottus^ var. caudatus of Coucs, the
Mimus polyglottos polyglottos^ Mimus polyglottos leucopterus of
Meams? Call them ^\\ Mimus polyglottos y giving in the general
description of the species geographic variation along with the
other variations.^
THE CALIFORNIA MEETING OF THE AMERICAN
ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION.
BY J. A. ALLEN.
In the April number of * The Auk* (XX, pp. 245, 246) reference
was made to a proposed special meeting of the A. O. U. to be
held in California some time in May of the present year. Details
were given of the itinerary for the outward trip and of the probable
cost of transportation for the round trip. The proposition met
with such cordial approval that two Pullman cars were required for
the accommodation of the members and their friends who desired
to avail themselves of so favorable an opportunity to visit the
Pacific coast. Chicago was the point of rendezvous for the depar-
^ Since the above was written, I have read Dr. Allen's observations on
* Species, Varieties, and Geographical Races ^ in the *■ Mammals and Winter
Birds of East Florida^ (Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Vol. II, no. 3, April, 1871,
pp. 242-249). So far have we drifted, that the republication of these obser-
vations, written more than thirty y^ars ago, would be a timely elucidation of
the present questions in ornithological nomenclature.
300 California Meeting of tkt A, O. U. [^^
ture, the A. O. U. special cars being attached to a train of the Santa
F6 Railway leaving that city at 10.30 p. m,, May 3 ; and San Fran-
cisco was reached on the afternoon of May 14. The eleven days
thus spent were exceedingly profitable to the travelers, the
journey being broken at several points for the purpose of making
side trips to places of special interest, as the old historic town of
Santa F^ in New Mexico, where a day was spent ; at Adamana, in
eastern Arizona, in the Little Colorado Desert, a day was given to
the wonderful * Petrified Forests ' ; two days were allotted to a side
trip from Williams, Arizona, to the Grand Cafion of the Colorado ;
a morning at Hesperia, Arizona, gave opportunity for an examina-
tion of the famous yucca trees in the Mohave Desert ; an afternoon
at Riverside, California, was a delightful experience, and a day*s
stop at Los Angeles was improved by many of the party to make
a trip to the summit of Mount Lowe.
Very few of the members of the party had previously visited the
country traversed, and everything was new and intensely interest-
ing ; and, fortunately, among the few to whom the country was
not new were experts who through previous extended field work in
the region were able to give information respecting its topographic
features and the peculiarities of its flora and fauna.
At Chicago an informal reception was given to the A. O. U.
members by Mr. and Mrs. Ruthven Deane, at whose house they
thus had opportunity to meet many Chicago ornithologists and
naturalists ; a reception was tendered them at Los Angeles by the
Southern Division of the Cooper Ornithological Club. In San
Francisco they received a most cordial welcome from the members
of the Cooper Ornithological Club and the California Academy of
Sciences, the Museum of the Academy forming the general head-
quarters, and in its lecture hall was held the two days' joint ses-
sion of the A. O. U. and the Cooper Club.
The purpose of holding a meeting of the A. O. U. at some point
on the Pacific coast was, primarily, to bring together as many as
possible of the working ornithologists of the East and the West ;
it was therefore especially opportune that the first special meeting
of the A. O. U. and the Tenth Anniversary meeting of the Cooper
Ornithological Club could be held in joint session.
The meeting was called to order at x x a. m., May 15, Dr. C.
^ W^] California Meeting of the A. O, U. 3 O I
Hart Merriam, President of the A. O. U., in the chair, and Mr.
Charles R. Keyes, Secretary of the Cooper Club, acting as secre-
tary. Mr. Charles A. Keeler gave a brief address of welcome
in behalf of the Cooper Club, and an appropriate response was
made by the President of the A. O. U. An afternoon and an
evening session followed, and the meeting reconvened at 10.15
A. M., May 16, adjourning, sifu die, at 12.30 p. m., of the same day.
Thirteen eastern members of the A. O. U., and thirty-three
members of the Cooper Club were in attendance at the various
meetings, and about twenty visitors.
The following papers were read :
I. Origin and Distribution of the Chestnut-backed Chickadees. Joseph
Grinnell.
• 2. The Cassin Auklet. Howard Robertson.
3. Recognition of Geographic Variation in Nomenclature. Leverett
Mills' Loomis.
•4. Notes on the Fresno District. J. M. Miller.
• 5. Do Valley Quail use Sentinels ? Jno. J. Williams.
6. An Island Community, or Bird-Life on Laysan ; illustrated with
lantern slides. Walter K. Fisher.
7. Notes on the Birds of Chili. Joseph Mailliard.
8. Call Notes of the Bush-tit. Joseph Grinnell.
9. General Habits of the Prairie Falcon. Donald A. Cohen.
10. Oregon Birds caught with a Camera ; illustrated with lantern
slides. Wm. L. Finley.
II, The Bird Islands of Our Atlantic Coast ; illustrated with lantern
slides. Frank M. Chapman.
12. Remarks on the A. O. U. Journey across the Continent. Louis
A. Fuertes.
13. Tl)e Farallon Islands ; illustrated with lantern slides. W. Otto
Emerson.
Resolutions of thanks were adopted on the part of the A. O. U.
members for the courtesies extended to them by the members of
the Cooper Club and the Academy of Sciences, and to the A. O.
U. Committee of Arrangements for the California trip.
The eastern A. O. U. members present were C. Hart Merriam,
President A. O. U. ; J. A. Allen, Louis B. Bishop, H. C. Bumpus,
Frank M. Chapman, John Lewis Childs, Mrs. E. B. Davenport,
J. Dwight, Jr., J. H. Fleming, L. A. Fuertes, W, W. Maires, T. S.
Palmer, Otto Widmann.
• Read by title at the close of the session.
302 California Meeting oj ike A. O. U. [J2^
In the afternoon following adjournment a trip was made to the
Leland Stanford University at Palo Alto, in response to an invita-
tion from its President, Dr. Jordan. The following day Mount
Tamalpais was ascended by rail, the descent being made by the
Ross Canon trail, for the purpose of seeing its fine redwoods, and
getting into close touch with some of the forms of vegetation and
bird life characteristic of this portion of California.
On arrival in San Francisco the A. O. U. party practically dis-
banded, as it was planned to do from the first, the various mem-
bers independently making their plans for the return journey and
for such side trips as their several interests dictated. The
Yoscmite Valley and Monterey were points subsequently visited by
many of the members, while the Farallons, and various points on
the coast, in the San Joaquin and Sacramento valleys, and in the
high Sierras attracted others, some six weeks or more being avail-
able for field work or sightseeing before the expiration of the time
allotted for the trip. Messrs. Chapman, Dwight, Bishop, and
Fuertes planned somewhat extended collecting trips, and were
greatly aided in their plans for work b^ the kindness of various
numbers of the Cooper Club.
The trip is one to be long remembered by those who were so
fortunate as to be numbered among the congenial part)' of forty-
four persons who left Chicago on the evening of May 3, on the
A. O. U. excursion to California. The lay members, so to
speak, will return with greatly enlarged views of the country and
its resources and scenic wonders; the strictly ornithological con-
tingent will have acquired a clearer conception of the varied
physical conditions of the vast region between the Mississippi
River and the Pacific coast, and of its diversified faunal and floral
areas, and the wonderfully varied climatic conditions included
within the boundaries of the State of California ; and last but let
us hope not least in value are the acquaintances the eastern mem-
bers were enabled to form with the leading workers in Pacific
coast ornithology, whom for the most part they had previously
known only through correspondence or their published writings.
The Cooper Club has most thoroughly redeemed its promise (see
editorial in 'The Condor' for July, 1902) to give "a cordial
welcome and a generous reception " to the A. O. U. in the event
of its being able to arrange a meeting in California.
^°wT General Notes, 303
GENERAL NOTES.
Great Black-backed Gull in Oneida County, N. Y. — An immature
female Great Black-backed Gull {Larus marinus) was shot in the southern
part of this town, the latter part of Februarj, 1903. This is the first
recorded occurrence of the species in this county. — W. S. Johnson,
BooHvilUy Oneida County^ N. Y.
Additional Records of the European Widgeon {Mareca penelofe) in
Indiana. — My last record of this duck for Indiana was noted in 'The
Auk,' Vol. XVI, 1899, p. 270.
An adult male was killed March 27, 1903, on the Englis Lake marshes
by Mr. James M. McKay and the mounted bird is now in his possession.
While he came to the decoy alone, there were several flocks of his Amer-
ican cousins on the marsh at the time, in whose company he had undoubt-
edly been.
Mr. Harry Ehlers of Chicago, has in his collection of mounted ducks,
an adult male which he shot April 7, 1898, and a female shot March 28,
1898. This pair was taken on the Kankakee marshes near Thayer,
Indiana. Another male was killed by Mr. Peter Willem of Chicago, near
the same locality on March 31, 1902, and the mounted speciHien is in his
possession.
As a specimen was captured on Licking Reservoir, Ohio, in 1902,* and
three others on the Monroe marshes, Michigan, in 1900 and 1902.2 These
records bring the number to seventeen for the interior and nine for the
State of Indiana. It is not a little strange that all these Indiana birds
should have been taken along the Kankakee River during a period of
twenty-two years. — Ruthvkn Deane, Chicago^ IlL
Hybrid Duck — Mallard {Anas boschas) -\- Pintail (Dajila acuta). — Eight
or ten years ago there was killed in this vicinity by Mr. George Lower
(since deceased) a hybrid duck — Anas boschas (Mallard) -\- Dafila acuta
(Pintail) — which specimen has just been placed in the Colorado Museum
of Natural History in this city. I have recently had an opportunity of
making a detailed study of this specimen and hav& carefully compared it
with typical A. boschas and D. acuta, the results of which comparison I
here give.
Bill plumbeous with black stripe on culmen as in J D. acuta^ but in
measurements showing tendency toward A. boschas, being .75 broad at
base and having culmen of 2.25 ; forehead and crown grayish brown
streaked with black as in D. acuta, this well defined stripe merging intu
plain light cinnamon upon and terminating in a blunt point at the pos-
*The Wilson Bulletin, New Series, Vol. IX, p. 71.
• The Auk, Vol. XIX, p. 284.
304 Gemerai Notts. [A«k
terior extremity of the occiput ; rest of head showing blending of brown
of D. acuta with brilliant metallic green of •$ A. bo»ckas with strong
tendencies toward the latter, the postocular region, extending from the
eye backward across the head and from the stripe on the upper head diag-
onally downward to a point opposite the base of the lower mandible,
bronze-green, which in the remaining portions of the head and neck
shades into more definite bronze ; open collar of lower neck .50 wide in
front, widening to .75 on sides, and in rear extending upward into points,
and here being 1.50 wide, thus showing a clear and very interesting com-
bination of the regular narrow open collar of $ A. bosckas and the long
white stripes of the hind neck of $ D. acuta ; upper chest, covering an
area 4 in. across from neck collar, light cinnamon showing a blending of
the dark chestnut of $ A, bosckas with the white of f D. acuta \ lower
chest, breast and abdomen grayish white Cnot as dark as in ^ ^. bosckas
nor as light as in i D. acuta)^ lower chest covering an area 2 in. wide
without zigzag markings but mottled with half concealed circular brown-
ish spots (the terminal portions of shaft markings as in 9 Z>. acuta);
remaining lower parts with faint zigzag dusky markings am in ^ A.
bosckas; sides and flanks as in i A. bosckas; back and rump very much
as in $ />. acuta but markingrg narrower and white much less prominent ;
tail 5.75. the four middle feathers (which are not as pointed as in <f D.
acuta) fornting the * pin,* one feather of each of the middle and second
pairs overlapping the other along the midrib, the middle pair dishing up
at an angle of 45*^ and the second pair at an angle of 20^, thus showing a
tendency to curl as in ^ ^. bosckas; two middle tail feathers iridescent
green, two second feathers bronze-green narrowly edged with white,
remaining tail feathers with gray centres and white edgings as in ^ D.
acuta but edjjings broader ; upper and under tail-coverts as in $ D. acuta :
"scapulars brownish gray, darker than in S D, acuta and lighter than in
(^ A. bosckas, with zigzag markings finer than in i D. acuta and a tritle
coarser than in $ A. bosckas^ with jet-black scapular patch corresponding
to that of <y D. acuta but of less extent, being only 2.50 in. long by .50 in.
broad; specuhnn brilliant metallic green like that of head of <f A. bosckas
in marked contrast with the metallic violet speculum of S ^' bosckas and
the purplish bronze speculum of rj D. acuta, also differing from both
these species in its anterior bordering, which in this hybrid is bicolored
— gravish brown posteriorly and grayish white anteriorly; remaining
wing markings as in <J A. bosckas; legs and feet same size and color at
in A. bosckas. — A. II. ^ELiiKR, Denver, Col.
The King Rail in Plymouth County, Massachusetts. — On January 20,
1903, an adult female, Rallus elcfrans was short by Mr. Clarence Chandler
at Ellisville, Plymouth County, Mass. The bird was at once sent to me
and proved to be quite fat and in tine plumage. When shot the rail was
skulking among some low l)iishes and dry grass near a salt marsh. —
Arthur Lincoln Rkagii, M. D.. West Roxbury, Mass.
^?io^] General Notes. 305
Early Record for the Piping Plover {^gialiiis meloda) in Rhode
Island. — I have just obtained a Piping Plover which was taken on March
24 last bv Mr. C. B. Clarke, a local taxidermist. The bird, which is a
male in spring plumage, was shot on the Middletown marshes about
three miles east of Newport. I believe this is the earliest spring record
for the State. — LeRoy King, Newport, R. I.
Richardson's Owl {Nyctala tengmalmi rickardsoni) in Illinois. — The
onl^r previous capture of this owl in the State was recorded in the ^Orni-
thologist and 051ogist/^ one having been taken October 15, 1884, at
Rockford. I am indebted to Mr. Robert H. Van Schaack for the follow-
ing information: "The Richardson's Owl was shot by my son, Louis F.
Van Schaack, December 26, 1902, in Kenil worth, III. He found the bird
along a small ditch that drains from the Skokie Swamp; he shot the owl
with a toy air gun." I examined the specimen while in the possession
of the taxidermist who mounted it, who informed me that he had mounted
another specimen of this species about the same time, which was said to
have been shot not far from Chicago, but I have been unable to get any
definite locality or date. — Ruthven Deane, Chicago, III.
Nesting of the Red-bellied Woodpecker in Harford County, Maxyland.
— Until within the last few years, I have found the Red-bellied Wood-
pecker {Afelanerpes carolinus) to be quite a rare bird within a radius of
twenty miles of Baltimore, and, until very lately, most of my records were
made during the winter months.
For the past twenty years it has been common in the vicinity of
Princess Anne, Somerset County, Maryland, but all my dates were made
in the months of November, December, and January, the only time I was
there. Still, from all I can find out, I am sure it is a resident there the
year round, and my friends on the farm tell me they find it very
destructive to the cherries.
On April 21, 1891, 1 made what I called my first spring note on the
species, a bird being seen in a piece of heavy timber at Grace's Quarter
Ducking Shore on the Gunpowder River, Baltimore County. This made
me think perhaps they might nest here, but I saw no more birds within
the breeding season until April, 1899, although, on July 28, 1898, in this
same piece of woods Mr. F. C Kirkwood and I saw an immature bird
busily dodging the fierce attacks of a Red-headed Woodpecker.
Again, August 13, 1899, about one half mile from where the former
young bird was seen, I saw two young, so small that the down was still
clinging to their heads. These were apparently hunting for grubs and
when one would fly it was immediately followed by the other, they
seldom keeping more than ten feet apart.
Finally, after a little over twelve years' search for the nest I was
> Ornithologist and OSlogist, Vol. X, March, 1885.
3o6
General Notes, UaJy
rewarded by finding it May ii, 1902. The nest was in a dead stub
growing up from the side of a red oak, and was twenty-four feet from the
ground. The opening measured 2 X 2^ inches and it was 5 inches from
the outer edge of the hole to the back wall. It went straight down for
11^ inches, and the four eggs were resting on some fine chips.
About twelve inches below the entrance to the nest was a smaller hole.
This had been commenced by the birds, but was abandoned, as they had
run into a hard knot after digging in about li inches. The eggs were
deposited just back of the lower hole, and there was only about one fourth
of an inch of wood between them and the abandoned opening. The
cggSf which are now in the collection of Mr. F. C. Kirkwood, were about
ready to hatch.
The Red-bellied Woodpecker can now be called a resident species for
Maryland, as I have data for every month in the year.
The only authentic record I have of their breeding in the StAte other
than mine is a note of Mr. L. D. Willis, who saw old birds feeding young
near Church Creek, Dorchester County, May 5, 1897. He says the nest
was about 60 feet up, in the dead top of a red oak. — William H. Fisiikr,
Baltimore^ Md.
A Much Mated House Sparrow. — In the spring of 1895 I placed a
small box with a movable top in a tree near a window of my room in
order to try a few experiments with the prolific English Sparrow {Passer
domesticus) and made the following observations in 1S97. During the
coldest days and nights of the winter the box was not inhabited, but
during warm spells it was occupied by three sparrows, a male and two
females. On February 26 I first saw them carry straw to the box to r»fpair
the old nest. The male had driven away one of the females and had con-
siderable trouble to keep her away.
I have noticed that where House Sparrows live in a box they take much
time in constructing their nest, which is often not completed until some
time after the eggs are laid, while those that build in trees build the
whole nest in a day or two.
On March 15 the birds were still building. On March 19 I saw them
copulate ; also on March 23, and again on March 25. Then I shot the
female while the male was only two feet away from her; he not hearing
any noise, could not make out what ailed her, but it did not take him long
to collect his thoughts, for he darted down and was on the ground before
the female touched it. As she struck the ground she bounded in the air
about a foot, which frightened him. He approached to within a foot of
her and fluttered around her. She never even moved her wings after 1
shot her. My dog picked up the dead bird but I made him drop it by
calling to him, but the male did not go back to her. Ten minutes after
the male was courting another female ; he seemed to know his mate was
dead and wanted another immediately. On dissecting the dead bird I
found the ovaries all small and the bird was apparently an old one.
^*59o?^] General Notes. 307
On the morning of March 26 I heard the birds in the tree, and on;
looking out saw the male enter the box and three females were flying
around the outside. He stood in the doorway and acted as if he was
afraid thev wanted to enter, and when one flew near the door he would
rush in, turn around and chatter, as these birds do when flghting. Soon
one of the females left, when the male came out and courted one of the
other two. The other protested but soon flew away. On March 27 I saw
them copulating, and also on March 28, and again on April 2 and 3.
Then I shot the female when the male was not around. This was at
noon. All the afternoon he did nothing but chirp. On dissecting the
female I found the ovaries were well developed, she being nearly ready to
lay ; the bird was apparently a young of the previous year.
On April 4 he had another mate, but she seemed afraid to go into the
box. She would enter half way and then back out. The next day she
went into the box. April 10 and 11 I saw them copulate, and again on
April 17, when I shot the female, at the entrance to the box while the
male was on the top looking over at her. The male was very much
frightened and flew away. On dissecting the female I found the ovaries
very small. On April 22, the male was chirping near the box, coaxing
the females to come near and then driving them away. April 23 he was
courting a female near the box. On the morning of April 24 he had Ave
females near the box. The supply of female sparrows seemed to be much
greater than the demand. April 29 he was again mated. May 6 I saw
them copulating. May 19 I shot this female and a cat got it. I now had
to leave home for a few days, but on May 27 I found he not only had a
new mate but I took from the nest five eggs, four slightly incubated and
one addled. I did not shoot this bird, and on May 30 and 31 I saw them
copulate. I have no further notes, as I was away the rest of the summer.
This bird had five mates up to the first of June, and he did not seem to
mind, only for a few minutes, the loss of any of them, and always got a
new mate sooner when he saw his mate killed (in one case in ten minutes)
than when she was killed when he was away.
Apparently there must be many birds that go unmated throughout the
year, for late in April this male had five females after him, all at one time.
It would be interesting if some one who has the opportunity would experi-
ment by shooting the male and see if the female would get another mate,
and also carry the observation to a later period in the year. We often see
several male birds flghting in the street for one female, but in this case the
male had more females than he wanted. — J. H. Clark, Patersoti^ N. J.
The Louisiana Water-Thrush in Minnesota. — On May 23, 1903, my
father and I, while collecting small birds on the right bank of the Miss-
issippi River near the mouth of Minnehaha Creek, shot an adult male
Louisiana Water-Thrush (Seiurus motacilla). Though the female was
not seen she was probably nesting near by as the male was in full song.
Although Ridgway gives it (Birds of North and Middle America, Part II,
3o8 General Notts, [ JjjJ
p. 640), as breeding in the '^Mississippi bottoms as far as Red Wing,"
about fifty miles below Minnehaha Creek, we had not hitherto found
this species in the vicinity of Fort Snelling. — Louis di Zbrsca
Mbarns, Fart Snelling-^ Minn.
Lophophanes vs. Bseolophus. — If the Crested Tits are to be separated
generically from Parus^ as the writer thinks should be done, the name
Lophophanes should be restricted to the Palsearctic species, and the name
Bceolophus Cabanis, used for the American species. The two groups
differ materially in structural detail, and each runs through the same
scale of variation as to style of coloration, both genera containing
conspicuously "bridled" species {Lophophanes cristatus and Betolophms
wollweberi) and excessively plain-colored species (Lophophanes dichrom$
and Bceolophus inornaius). This parallelism in color-variation has sened
to confuse the case by leading those authors who would separate the two
groups to place B. wollweberi in the genus Lophophanes on account of
its general resemblance in coloration to L» cristatus ; but B, wollweberi
represents the extreme differentiation of the American group in structural
characters.
The species and subspecies of Baolophus recognized by the A. O. U.
Committee on Classification and Nomenclature are as follows : —
731. Bceolophus bicolor (Linn.).
73i<». Bceolophus bicolor texensis (Sennett).
732. Bceolophus atricristatus (Cassin).
733. Bteolophus inornatus (Gambel).
733^7. Bceolophus inornatus griseus (Ridgway).*
733^. Bceolophus inornatus cineraceus (Ridgway).
734. B(eolophus wollweberi (Bonap). —
Robert Ridgway, U. S. National Museum^ Washington, D. C.
Balancing with One Wing. — Soon after reading Mr. Fishers' article
in * The Auk ' for April on one wing equilibrium, I had an opportunity
to observe this same method of balancing in the common Blue Jay. I
secured a young Blue Jay, who had been out of the nest only twelve
hours. When he perched on my finger, I turned the linger over, so as to
destroy his equilibrium. But he would not be thrown off, but once shot
out his left wing and gained his balance. I tried this experiment several
times, with the result that he always gained his balance with one wing.
usually the left one, as in Mr. Fisher's House Finches. He used hi*
> The removal of this form from the genus Parus renders the suppression
of the subspecific name griseus and the substitution of riJgwayi^ as proposed
by Dr. Richmond, unnecessar}'.
/
^^9o?T General Notes, 309
right wing independently of the left, however, two or three times ; but the
left wing was used much more. This must be an inherited instinct, for
the bird had not been with its parents since leaving the nest, for more
than a few minutes, having been immediately placed in captivity, and
the experiment tried twelve hours later. — Ernest Seeman, Durham^ N. C.
Ohio Notes. — I count myself fortunate in having found a pair of
Rose-breasted Grosbeaks in this vicinity. They rarely nest here,
usually remaining with us a few days, then going farther north, but this
pair evidently intends to remain. I first saw them the i8th of May flying
about a thicket of young trees and bushes as if their nests were near.
Since that date I have seen the pair a number of times but have not yet
found the nest. 1 am satisfied, however, that it is in the thicket and I
will probably find it when the young are hatched.
The Red-headed Woodpeckers have apparently deserted this vicinity
permanently ; I have seen but two birds this spring. The numerous
traction lines being constructed, and the consequent building up of the
country districts, is, I think, the chief cause of their disappearance. On
a recent trip through the more eastern counties I found the Redheads to
be numerous.
The various ornithological and nature societies of Cincinnati and
Hamilton County are again considering methods of dealing with the
English Sparrows. In Cincinnati they are particularly troublesome, but
in the past all efforts to control them have failed.
In southwestern Ohio the Cuvier Club of Cincinnati has compelled a
rigid enforcement of the laws protecting our birds and has accomplished
much good. Many of the desirable species are much more common than
formerly. Cardinals, Orioles, Goldfinches, Thrashers, and other species
are numerous. Chats, Flickers, Tanagers, Catbirds, etc., while not so
numerous as the first mentioned species, are quite common. — Nat. S.
Grbbn, Camp Dennison^ Ohio,
Louisiana Migration Notes. — During the past spring at New Orleans,
and at other localities having the same latitude, additional data have been
collected that show the extreme procrastination of many of the Warblers
during the spring migration. In the wake of strong migratory impulses
the last paft of April, several ^species have loitered in this section until
May was nearly half gone. The last Tennessee Warbler was noted May
9, at Audubon Park, New Orleans. April 29, and the week succeeding,
this species had been reasonably common in the willow and hackberry
thicket that grows on the river front at Audubon Park. In company with
the Tennessee Warbler on April 26 and for one or two of the succeeding
days,' were one or two each of the Redstart, Black-throated Green Warbler,
Magnolia Warbler, and Bay-breasted Warbler. In the matter of song,
however, the Tennessee Warbler was alone. Mr. W. B. Allison reports
3 I O Recent Literature, F ^^
that in the oak and pine woods at Bay St. Louis, Miss., on yie Gulf Coast,
the preceding species, excepting the Tennessee Warbler, were still pres-
ent as late as May lo.
The character of weather that induces this delay sometimes persists in
the latitude of New Orleans past the middle of May, so it is doubtful how
late the migrants of the class referred to would be apt to linger. The
extreme record so far established is May 15 for the Redstart and Bav-
breasted Warbler. One of each species was seen on that date in 1902 at
New Iberia, La., 125 miles west of New Orleans, on the edge of the fertile
prairies of southwest Louisiana, in which region migration is noticeably
later than at New Orleans. The lateness of this date is less surprising
for the Redstart than for the Bay-breasted Warbler, as the Redstart has
been found breeding in central and northern Louisiana. Audubon, how-
ever, records that he became acquainted with the Bay-breasted Warbler
in a cotton field in June. I have never seen any explanation of this
anomaly. — H. H. Kopman, New Orleans^ La,
RECENT LITERATURE.
Mudge on the Tongue Muscles of Parrots.* — This paper contains a
detailed and careful study of the muscles of the tongues of various spe-
cies of Parrots and presents a scheme of classification based upon them
and on the bones of the hyoid. Reference is made to the observations
of others on the tongues of birds, but it might have been said that many
of them, and especially the papers by Lucas, dealt with external modifica-
tions only. Nothing is said of these in the present memoir, so that we
do not know whether or not Prof. Mudge^attaches any value to outside
characters, although we infer that he does not since Trickoglo%su$ is not
merely accorded no special rank, but is not even mentioned in the table
of classification. The author states that his investigations show that
the lingual muscles of the parrots are in the course of evolutionary
changes, some of the muscles exhibiting the structural variations indica-
tive of these much more markedlv than others, and that the Loriidv
have advanced farthest along the road of specialization. He then pro-
' On the Myology of the Tongue of Parrots, with a Classification of the
Order, based upon the Structure of the Tongue. By Geo. P. Mudge, A. B»
C. S. lx)nd., F. Z. S. etc. Trans. Zool. Soc. Ix>ndon, Vol. XVI, Oct 1902, pp.
211-272, pU. xxvi-xxix.
^^^^iw^] Recent Literature. 3 1 1
ceeds to trace the various stages of evolution in the order of their proba-
ble occurrence, illustrating the conditions found in a large number of
species by admirable figures. And it may be said that only one who has
done similar work can fully appreciate the time and labor that this study
must have entailed. At the end we are presented with a table giving a
systematic arrangement of the divisions of the parrots defined by the
characters offered by the lingual muscles and hyoid. By these the parrots
are divided into three families, Loriidae, Nestoridse and Psittacidse; and
here the work of Mr. Mudge may be looked upon as confirming the views
of those who have established the first two families on other characters.
The Psittacidse are subdivided into two ' Groups/ one of which contains
only the Psittaculihae and Pyrrhulinae while the second consists of seven
subfamilies comprising the vast majority of parrots. To a certain extent
the geographical boundaries of the subfamilies agree with the anatomical
limits, but we find Caica bracketed with Pyrrkulopais, and Platycercus
with Bolborhynchus^ and the geographic unity is by no means conspicuous,
as it is in the divisions of Graves ^ Hand List.^
It may, perhaps, be a mere personal prejudice, but the Australian region
is so well marked ornithological ly that it seems a little suspicious to see
Australian and South American parrots placed in the same subfamily.
Still every ornithologist is aware that no two schemes for the subdivision
of the parrots agree in their minor details and that of Dr. Mudge is con-
sistent in using the same class of characters throughout.
It would have been interesting to have compared the present arrange-
ment with the results of Prof. Thompson's study of the cranial characters
of parrots but, unfortunately, Thompson failed to put his results into
definite shape and we are in the dark as to just what his ideas may be.
Some might perhaps urge against Prof. Mudge*s classification that
Stringops is not awarded a sufficiently high rank, being placed with other
Australian species in the Cacatuinse, but if Stringops^ though specialized
in some points is, on the whole, merely a cockatoo of generalized
structure this association is what might have been expected on theoreti-
cal grounds.
Finally, it may be suggested, without in the least wishing to depreciate
the most excellent work of Prof. Mudge, that it remains to be seen if an
examination of the lingual muscles of any other division of birds will
yield as good results as has been afforded in the present instance. The
parrots, in structure and habits, are a remarkably homogeneous group of
birds and it would seem that the differential evolution of their tongue
muscles might be more uniform than in any other group, and con-
sequently more available for purposes of classification. — F. A. L.
Winkenwerder on the Migration of Birds. — In the present paper ^ of
^ The Migration of Birds, with Special Reference to Nocturnal Flight. By
H. A. Winkenwerder. Bull. Wisconsin Nat. Hist. Soc, Vol. II, No. 4,
Oct., 1902, pp. 177-263, with diagrams and other illustrations.
312 Recent Literature, [ ^J*
nearly one hundred pages the author makes an important contribiition to
the literature of the subject, through, especially, his record of observations
on the nocturnal movements of birds as observed by himself and others
through telescopes. This detailed record, with the accompanying dia-
grams, forms an *• Appendix ^ of some 50 pages. The main discussion is
divided into four chapters: (i) Historical- Review; (2) The CauMfs of
Migration; (3) Migratory Routes; (4) The Manner of Migration. The
first two chapters seem rather perfunctory and unsatisfactory ; the t^econd,
on the causes of migration, closes with the following statement of the
author's conclusions: ''Birds are set in migratory motions by a complex
combination of changes in temperature, humidity and living nature.
The cause for rnigration, however, is the failure of food in two wide-
spread areas — the north and the south — at opposite seasons of the year**
(p. 196). He also says (p. 191): ''It has been maintained for yearf» that
the question of food will never explain the vernal migrations, however
well it serves that purpose in autumn. . . . The assumption that the que<>-
tion of food will not explain the vernal migration has probably been due
to our ignorance of the physical conditions of the south." He then cites
a remark of VVeismann's to the effect that "ponds, rivers and creeks
become dry, insects disappear and even vegetation fails in many regions
of the south in summer," and quotes "Mr. C R. Ricker " (/r^r, C B.
Riker ^) on the effect of the dry season on vegetation, etc, at Santarem,
Brazil (Mr. Winkenwerdcr, however, does not state the locality of Mr.
Riker's observations), and adds: "Do not cases of this kind give ua
rather striking evidence that the food supply of the south is limited ? '*
To Mr. Winkenwerder the matter is very simple. He says: "We have
thus two areas in the geographical distribution of birds that are deficient
in food at opposite seasons of the year, and we can see readily cnou^li
the cause for migration, both in the spring and in the fall "!
Under •Migratory Routes' the author describes the methods and di^-
cusses the evidence attorded by the extensive series of observations on the
nocturnal niovetnents of birds as seen through telescopes at Madison and
Heloit, Wise, Lake Forest, 111., and Detroit, Mich., during May. 1900. and
also in .\pril, May, September and October, 189S-1901, at Madi>on. The
theory of migratory routes is considered as established, and also the
theory that they are determined by the topographic features of the area«»
traversed.
ruder the head of ' The Manner of Migration ' are considered * Numbeis
associated .in Migration,' *The -\hitude attained in Migration.* and the
'Associations ot Individuals and Species.' Nine thousand bird* per
' Mr. Hiker's name is constantly misspelled "Kicker " throughout the paper.
Colics appears as "Cowch", other names of authors are also misspelled, and
Mr. Brewster's i>aper on bird migration is cited repeatedly as " Bull. Nutt. Orn.
Club, No. I," though sometimes correctly as Mem. Nutt. Orn. Club, No, 1.
^*«9«?^] R€C€nt Literature. 313
hour, it has been calculated, were seen by Dr. G. O. Libby, in 1897,
passing across the field of the telescope at the Washburn Observatory,
during the whole period of observation. Telescopic observations seem
to show that "by far the greater number do not attain an altitude much
over one half mile from the earth's surface," and that former estimates
of the altitudes at which birds migrate have been "far too high." As
other observers have shown, many species are found in close association
in migration, and also that the individuals may move singly, or in strag-
gling bands, or in compact ilocks.
As already intimated, the chief value of the present paper consists in
the record of a considerable mass of new telescopic observations on the
nocturnal flights of migrating birds. — J. A. A.
North American Water-Fowl. —Another bird volume of the 'American
Sportsman's Library ' series,^ recently issued, treats of the * Water-Fowl
Family.' 2 It forms a volume of about 600 pages, under the joint author-
ship of L. C. Sanford, Dr. L. B. Bishop, and T. S. Van Dyke, with numer-
ous illustrations by Fuertes, Bull, Frost, and others, the greater part of the
bird illustrations being by Fuertes. The first fourteen chapters (pp. i-
502), devoted to * Duck-shooting,* 'Goose-shooting,' 'The Swans,' ' Rail-
shooting,' and 'Shore-bird Shooting,* are by Mr. Sandford, while the
three chapters (pp. 503-564) treating of 'The Water-Fowl of the Pacitic
Coast,' are by Mr. Van Dyke. Then follows ' Diagnoses of Families and
Genera' (pp. 565-579), by Dr. Bishop, and a very full and satisfacloi v
index. Mr. Sanford has had a wide experience in the pursuit of North
American ' Wild-Fowl,* and writes from an intimate personal acquaint-
ance with the birds whose habits he so well describes. Some sixty pages
are first given to the general subject of Duck-shooting, describing the dif-
ferent methods prevailing at various localities and under diverse condi-
tions, including some remarks on 'The Decrease of Wild-Fowl ' (pp. 63-
70); then the Ducks are taken up in systematic sequence, species by
species, followed by a similar treatment of the Geese, Rails, and Shore-
Birds. All of the species and subspecies enumerate as North American
in the A. O. U. Check-List, the waifs and strays from other countries, are
included. Under each species is first given, in small type, a very full
description of the birds, including sexual and seasonal variations of
the plumage, in most cases including the downy young, and the eggs
' For a notice of the ' Upland Game Birds' see Auk, XIX, 1902, p. 306.
' The Water-Fowl | Family | By | L. C. Sanford | L. B. Bishop | and T. S.
Van Dyke | New York | The Macmillan Company | London : Macmillan and
Co., Ltd. I 1903 I All lights reserved — Crown 8vo, pp. ix -f- 598, i photo-
gravure and 19 half-tone plates from drawings by L. A. Fuertes, A. B. Frost
and C. L Bull. American Sportsman's Library Series, edited by Caspar
Whitney.
3 14 Recfmi Littraturt, [ ^Jjj
There is atoa s vfTy full statement of the geographical distribution,
prepared evpecially for use in the present connection by Dr. Bishop,
wtio has contributed the j^eneral matter relating to the River Ducks, Sea
Ducks, Mergansers, Geese, Swans, the Rail Family, etc., and the notices
of the extra-limital species, and some other matter. 'The Water-Fowl
Family' is thus a book for sportsmen which may be looked upon as tech-
nically correct in all matters of scientific detail, while the biographies of
the species are satisfactorily full, and the details especially of interest to the
sportsman are not omitted. The attention of ornithologists is directed to
this book as containing much matter of permanent value from the (stand-
point of the naturalist, and especially to Dr. Bishop's carefully prepared
summaries of the * habitats ' of the species, which give both the breeding
and winter ranges, so far as they are at present known. There is aUo a
note by Dr. Bishop (p. 365) on the intergradation of Tringa comrsi and T.
ptilocnemis, and apparently the first descriptions of the downy younj; of
several species of the Ducks and Shore-birds. — J. A. A.
The * New ' Edition of Nuttall. — Two previous editions of the * New
Nuttair have appeared during the last twelve years, the 6rst in 1S91.
reviewed at length and somewhat severely in Volume IX of *The Auk'
(pp. 59-61), and the second in 1896, noticed in * The Auk' for January,
1897 (XIV, p. 109). The present (third) edition * is a reprint from the
electrotype plates of the second edition, with the omission of Mr. Cham-
berlain's preface, and a reversion to the misleading titlepage of the tir»t
edition of tlie ' New Nuttall.* What we have is not * A Popular Handbook
of the Birds of the United States and Canada,' but, as properly exprc«»«»cd
in the title of the second edition, 'A Popular Handbook of the Ornithol-
ogy of Eastern North America.' Why the publishers should revert to
Nuttall's ori;(inal title when the little of Nuttall's original uork that
related to "species which occur only to the westward of the Mis>»issippi
valley " has been omitted (see preface to first edition), is a question the\
will doubtless be frequently called upon to answer by unsuspecting pur-
chasers of ' A Popular Handbook of the Birds of the I'nited States and
Canada.'
The present edition is printed on thin paper, thus bringing it within
convenient compass for binding as a single volume ; and the price beinj»
reduced from $7.50 to $3.00 will doubtless render the work available to a
1 A Popular Handbook | of the | Birds of the United States | and Canada j
By Thomas Nuttall | New Revised and Annotated Edition J By Montague
Chamberlain | With Additions, and One Hundred and Ten | Illustrations in
Color I Hoston | Little, Brown, and Company | 1903 — Crown 8vo, two vol-
umes bound in one, as separately paged * parts.' Part I, I^and Birds, pp. xliv
-f 473; Part II, (Jame and Water Birds, pp. ix -f- 4JI ; pll. col. i — xx, and 173
text cuts. Price, 5j.oo.
^ W^^] Recent Literature. 3 I ^
larger number of readers who would otherwise forego the possession of
the *New Nuttall,' which contains so much of the charming original.
—J. A. A.
Scotfs »The Sjtory of a Bird Lover.'— Mr. Scott's autobiography.'
published under the above title, forms a book of unusual interest. It has
a fascination hard to analyze, as probably few ornithologists who open
its pages will lay the book aside till the narrative of Mr. Scott's varied
experiences as a field naturalist and collector has been perused to the
end. That the title chosen is not unwarranted is evident throughout,
and his enthusiasm will awaken a responsive throb in the hearts of many
readers of kindred spirit. The * Story ' consists of fourteen chapters,
each dealing with either a distinct period in the author's history or with
some special excursion or field experience. It is written, we are informed,
mainly from the recollection of the events chronicled long after they
transpired, and thus evinces the author's retentive memory ; but there are
evidences here and there of slight lapses, or of lack of care in proof-
reading, as in the orthography of the names of some of the persons
mentioned in the early part of the narrative. The style is for the most
part terse, simple, and animated, and has about it a characteristic person-
ality unmistakable to those who have ever known Mr. Scott intimately.
The story begins with an account of the author's 'childhood,' * youth,'
and* student days,' and follows with a general recital, in chronological
order, of his field experiences, beginning with a trip to West Virginia in
1872, to western Missouri in 1874, to Florida in 1876, to Colorado in
1878, and to Florida again in 1878-79; the interval from 1882-1886 was
spent mainly in Arizona, and 1886-90 on the Gulf Coast of Florida ;
Jamaica was visited in the fall of 1890, and two trips were made later to
England. The scientific results of these numerous ornithological expedi-
tions having already been published in a long series of special papers,
only a list of them, in the form of a bibliographical supplement, being
here given ; but with the narrative is incorporated a large amount of per-
sonal reminiscence, relating to the people met with and the general
condition of the country at the various localities visited at dates now
so remote that these incidental references add much to the interest of
the ' Storv.'
The last chapter is entitled ' The Naturalist's Vision,' and deals with
his studies of live birds confined in aviaries. From small beginnings he
has now "a laboratory for the study of live birds," in which "between
four and five hundred individuals are now installed and under constant
observation." He outlines in this chapter some of the more obvious
^The I Story of a Bird Lover | By | William Earl Dodge Scott | [Design]
New York | The Outlook Company | 1903 — 8vo, pp. xi -|- 372, and frontis-
piece.
3 1 6 R€C€nt Literaturt, [ ^^
problems that await investigation, and which maj be studied to advantage
only through intimate acquaintance with individual birds; and 6nally
expresses his conception of how such worlc should be conducted.
As already said, Mr. Scott has given us a very attractive narrative of
his career as a naturalist; and so many matters of interest are chronicled
that we trust a suitable index, rendering them more readily acce^^ible,
will be supplied in future editions of the work. — J. A. A.
Mrs. Bigneirs * My Woodland Intimates.^ — The author of * Mr.
Chupes and Miss Jenny* (see Auk, XVIII, 1901, p. 288) here* presents
us with a series of delightful sketches of out-of-door scenes and incidents,
portraying the changing seasons and the attendant mutations in animal
and vegetable life as observed in a ''quiet, secluded, eastern New Jersey
haunt and its immediate neighborhood." The varying aspects of field
and woodland are noted under such titles as 'August Moods and Con-
trasts*; *En Route' (September); * Good-by to Summer* (October);
*Gray Days and Merry Ways' (November); 'The Solemn Midnight*
(Winter) ; and so on through the circle of the year. While the birds are
her major theme, all nature comes in review. The last chapter, * In the
North Country/ has for its scene "a beloved nook in the Laurentian
Mountains of Canada.** Intense sympathy with her subject, sincerity of
expression, keen and intelligent powers of observation, and a happy fac-
ulty of imparting to others what she has seen and felt characterize * My
Woodland Intimates,* and entitle Mrs. BignelTs second book to rank
high among popular nature books. — J. A. A.
Walter's 'Wild Birds in City Parks.*— The full title' of thi> little
brochure sufficiently explains its purpose, — to furnish "a simple letter of
introduction to 100 birds, the majority of which are commonly seen dur-
ing the spring migration " at Chicago. Some 'General Hints' arc first
given, in the form of a few characteristics of the principal bird families,
followed by ' Particular Hints,' giving the leading distinctive features of
100 species, arranged apparently in no particular order. There is aUo a
* Table of Arrival,* giving the birds in systematic sequence, with date^^
of arrival for the years 1897-1901, as observed in Lincoln Park, Chicago,
iMy Woodland Intimates | Hy | Effie Bignell | author of | "Mr. Chupes
and Miss Jenny " | New York | The Baker & Taylor Company | 33-37 East
17th St., Union Square North | — i2mo, pp. i-xii -f- 13-241. Price. 5i.oo,
net.
^ Wild Birds in City Parks, being hints on identifying 100 birds, prepared
primarily for the spring migration in Lincoln Park, Chicago. By Herbert
Eugene Walter and Alice Hall Walter. Revised edition. Chicago: A. W.
Mumford, Publisher, 378 Wabash Avenue, 1903. i6mo, pp. 45, with chart
for Migration Record. Price, 25 cts.
^**w^] Recent Liter attire, 3 1 7
and also other tables and charts relating to bird migration for tHe same
period and locality. The usefulness of this effort to aid beginners in
becoming acquainted with wild birds in life seems to be attested by the
appearance of the present revised edition. — J. A. A.
Snow's Catalogue of Kansas Birds. — Professor Snow has recently
issued a fifth edition of his Catalogue of Kansas Birds, ^ which first
appeared in April, 1872, and was reissued, with additions, in July, and
again in October, of the same year, the latter being commonly known as
the * second edition,' though here counted as the third. In 1875 a * third *
("in reality the fourth**) edition was issued, dated on the title-page
"November, 1875," and "January, 1876,** on the first page of the text, and
now stated to have been "complete to Jan. i, 1876.** The history and
character of these earlier editions is here given, followed by extended
comment on Goss's and Lantz*s Catalogues and especially on Prof. D. E.
Lantz*s * Review of Kansas Ornithology,* published in 1899 (see Auk,
XVI, pp. 364, 365). There is considerable criticism ot Lantz's ' Review,'
but the general tone seems rather hypercritical. The author treats the
historic portion of his subject (pp. i-ii) at length, and in minute detail,
even to points of trivial importance.
Upon this thorough foundation of criticism and research, such as the
bird fauna of few States has received, Professor Snow proceeds to give us
a ' Catalogue of the Birds of Kansas,* in which all species attributed to
Kansas whose occurrence in the State "cannot be verified bv actual
captures since the opening of the University of Kansas, in September,
1886,** are excluded, including 14 species entered in his earlier editions on
the manuscript authority of Dr. T. M. Brewer and Prof. Spencer F. Baird.
The list, as now revised and annotated, includes 342 species and sub-
species, not one of which is apparently open to question. While doubt-
less others may be added by future captures within the State, we have
here a most thorough and up-to-date exposition of the bird fauna of
Kansas. — J. A. A.
Proceedings of the Nebraska Ornithologists' Union. — The Proceedings
of the Third Annual Meeting of the Nebraska Ornithologists' Union
forms a thick pamphlet of 108 pages, well illustrated with sixteen half-
tone plates and about one hundred text cuts. The meeting was held at
Lincoln, Nebraska, Feb. i, 1902, with the President, Erwin H. Barbour,
in the chair and 19 members present. The officers elected for the ensuing
year were: President, J. M. Bates; Vice-President, Mrs. George H.
^ A Catalogue of the Birds of Kansas (fifth edition) with Notes upon Pre-
ceding Catalogues and Lists. By Francis H. Snow, Ph.D., LL. D., of the
University of Kansas. 8vo, pp. 23, May, 1903. Reprinted from Vol. XVIII,
Trans. Kansas Acad. Sciences.
3i8
Rectnt Littrainre, [ ^^
Pavnc; Corresponding Secretary, J. C. Crawford, Jr. ; Recording Secre-
tary, R. H. Wolcott; Treasurer, August Eiche. After the usual routine
business the President presented his address, entitled 'The Progenitors
of Birds,' which, very fully illustrated, occupies pp. ^39, of the * Pro-
ceedings/ The papers read at the meeting and here published number
a dozen or more, and include, among the longer articles, * Our Winter
Birds,' by M. H. Swenk (pp. 52-58, an annotated list of about 120 spe-
cies) ; * A Comparison of the Bird-life found in the Sand-hill Region of
Holt County in i883-'84 and in 1901,' by Lawrence Bruner (pp. 58-63) ;
* Some General Remarks upon the Distribution of Life in Northwest
Nebraska,* by Merritt Cary (pp. 63-75, includes an annotated list of the
birds) ; * Notes on the Nesting of Some Sioux County Birds,* by M. A.
Carriker, Jr. (pp. 75-89) ; ' Bird and Nest Photography,' by J. S. Trostlcr
(pp. 89-93) J * Record of Nebraska Ornithology,' by Robert H. Wolcott
(pp. 93-105, bibliography). On p. 107 is an interesting note on the
Carolina Paroquet, reported to have been abundant in 1856, and to have
bred on an island in the Missouri River near Brownville, in the south-
eastern corner of the State, but it suddenly disappeared about 1866. The
* Proceedings,' edited by Robert H. Wolcott, form an important contribu-
tion to Nebraska ornithology. — J. A. A.
Fisher on the Birds of Keam Canyon, Arizona.* — This i$ a nominal
list of 39 species, preceded by several pages descriptive of the region, and
general comment on the birds seen and formally listed at the end of the
paper. lie says : "Anyone unacquainted with the conditions of bird lite
in the arid regions would be disappointed with the small number of
speries found in Keam Canvon, and would be surprised at the meaj^re
representation of most of them. Although considerable time between
July 1 8 and August 3 [1894] was devoted to exploring the can von and
surrounding mesa for the purpose of observing birds, only thirtv-nine
species were found, and of these seven were included on single records."
— J. A. A.
Stone on a Collection of Birds from Sumatra. — Mr. Stone state^ that
this collection,' presented to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Phila-
delphia by the collectors, Messrs. Harrison and Hiller, is the "most exten-
sive ever brought to America from this island and adds materially to our
knowledge of the distribution and relationships of a number of specie*.''
The collection includes 138 species, of which one is described as new,
^ A Partial List of the Birds of Keam Canyon, Arizona. By A. K. Fisher.
The Condor, Vol. V, 1903, pp. 33-36.
* A Collection of Birds from Sumatra, obtained by Alfred C. Harrison. Jr.,
and Dr. H. M. Hiller. By Witmer Stone. Proc. Acad. Nat. ScL Phila,
1902, pp. 670-691. Jan. 20, 1903.
^*>9«>^^] Recent Literature. 3I9
and there is extended critical comment on a considerable number of
others. Mr. Stone finds that a majority of the species appear to range
"from the lower Malay Peninsula throughout Sumatra and many into
Java without material differentiation ; and a comparison of the combined
lists from Deli, in the northwestern extremity of the island, with those
from Lampong, in the southeastern corner, show that the majority of the
species occur at both points. In fact, the high mountains of the south-
central part of Sumatra seem to be the only region when a conspicuously
different avifauna exists. The materials are, however, far too limited to
warrant any positive statements on the matter." — J. A. A.
McGregor on Birds from Norton Sound.^ — In June, 1900, Mr. Mc-
Gregor made a trip to Norton Sound, Alaska, on the U. S. Coast and Geo-
detic Survey steamer * Pathfinder,' where he spent the season, from June
27 to September 25. Although for the most part engaged in other work,
he secured a collection of about two hundred bird skins, which, with his
field observations, form the basis of the present paper, comprising a
list of 63 species, with important and in some cases quite extended field
notes. The paper is a most welcome and very interesting contribution to
our knowledge of the summer bird life of the region bordering Norton
Sound. — J. A. A.
McGregor on Philippine Birds. — The first number of a new publication
entitled 'Bulletins of the Philippine Museum * consists of a paper by Mr.
Richard C. McGregor, * giving the more important results of four collect-
ing trips to various islands of the Philippine group. In these notes are
recorded seven species new to the Philippine Islands, including a new C///-
bia from Cuyo Island ; descriptions of previously undescribcd plumages
of four species ; notes on some of the rarer species ; and a list of new
localities for a large number of previously known species, recorded for
the first time from the various islands mentioned in the title of the paper,
including nearly one hundred species from Ticao, where some three
months were spent.
From an explanatory note in No. II of the * Bulletins/ which gives a
list of Philippine bird skins offered in exchange for first-class bird skins
from "Borneo, the Moluccas, Formosa, and the Asiatic coast region adja-
cent to the Philippines," we learn : " The Philippine Commission hns
passed an act providing for the establishment of a Museum of Ethnologv,
Natural History, and Commerce, and has made a preliminary appropri-
^A list of Birds Collected in Norton Sound, Alaska, By Richard C
McGregor. The Condor, Vol. IV, 1902, pp. 135-144.
'On Birds from Luzon, Mindoro, Masbate, Ticao, Cuyo, Culion, Cagaxan
Suiu, and Palawan. By Richard C. McGregor. Bulletins of the Philippii<e
Museum. I, Jan. 10, 1903. pp. 1-12.
320 Recent Literature. \j^
ation to be used in the gathering of material pending the erection of a
suitable museum building for the housing of exhibits and the preservation
of study specimens. Systematic collecting of the birds and mammals of
the Archipelago was begun some months since, and will be steadilr prose-
cuted." The work is under the able direction of Prof. Dean C. Worcester.
Secretary of the Interior, and well-known for his excellent work on the
ornithology of the Philippines, of which only some of the preliminary
results have yet been published. Mr. McGregor is evidently proving a
most valuable aid in carrying out the work above outlined. — J. A. A.
Bangs on New Subspecies of American Birds. — During the last few-
months Mr. Bangs has characterized, in a series of papers in the * Pro-
ceedings' of the New England Zoological Club, a number of new buh-
species of American birds, as follows: (i) Parui carolimeHsts impiger}
based on specimens from the vicinity of Lake Ashby, Florida, which dif-
fer from the northern form in much smaller size and more brownish gray
back. (2) Thryophilus galbraitki.conditus^ from San Miguel Island, Bay
of Panama. (3) Cardinalis cardinaln magnirostris? from West Baton
Rouge Parish, Louisiana, characterized by larger and heavier bill, a^
compared with its allies. (4) Vireosylx^ia josepkee ckiriqmeft$is^ from
Boquete, Volcan de Chiriqui, differing in yellower underparts and
brighter olive green back from V. josepkee^ dtscrihed from Pallatanga.
Ecuador. (5) Merula leucaachen cnepkoraf from the same locality as the
last. (6) Ardea herodias cognata* based on a single specimen from the
Galapagos Islands, with paler colors, smaller size and larger bill than
North American specimens of A. herodias. (7) Scotothnruf z^ertrpacis
dumicola'' a dark southern form of 5. Xfcnrpacis, (8) lifanacuf camdei
electilis,^ a new name for the Mexican form. — J. A. A.
Bangs's Revised List of Birds of the Liu Kiu Islands.' — .\ nominal
'A New Race of the Carolina Chickadee from Southern Florida. Proc. N.
Kngl. ZoiU. Club. Vol. IV, pp. i, 2, March 16, 1903.
'^ A New Wren from San .Miguel Island. Bay of Panama. Ibid., pp. 3. 4.
^ The Louisiana Cardinal, /hid., pp. 5-7.
* A New Race of Virc-iHyh-iu josc/>/iicixoiti Chiriqui. /hid., pp. 9, 10.
* Description of a New Thrush from Chiriqui. /bid.^ Vol. Ill, pp. 91. w2,
Oct. 10, \\)02.
® Description of a New Race of the Great Blue Heron from the Galapagos
Islands. /hid., pp. 99, 100, Feb. 6, 1903.
"A New Race of Scotothurus verapacis ixova Chiriqui. Ibid.y pp. 103, 104.
* Description of a New Subspecies of Manacus candei (Pazurd.). /bid.^ pp.
105, 106.
* Stejneger*s Catalogue of Birds thus far recorded from the liu Kiu
Islands. Japan, revised with Additions to date. Proc. N. Engl. 2^61. Soc^
III, pp. 93-97» Feb. 6, 1903.
^*«<w ^] Recent Literature. 3 2 1
list, bringing Dr. Stejneger's list, published in 1887 (77 species), down
to date, with introductory comment, the number of species now recorded
being 99. — J. A. A.
Barrett Hamilton on the Position of the Legs of Birds during Flight. —
In a paper * of about a dozen pages the author briefly summarizes what
had been previously published on the subject and adds his own obser-
vations and some others previously unpublished. The paper closes with
a list of the species observed, arranged in the two categories : • Legs car-
ried pointing backward,' and * Legs carried bent forward.* The latter
consists almost wholly of passerine birds, while the former includes birds
of all the other orders. The legs of birds, it is noted, often afford great
and constant assistance in flight. **It is almost as if, to some birds, the
legs are nearly more important as organs of flight than of progression on
land."— J. A. A.
Dubois's * Synopsis Avium.' — Since our last notice of this important
work (Auk, XIX, Oct., 1902, p. 409) two additional parts (XI and XII)
have come to hand, carrying the subject into the Herodiones. Part XI
includes the Columbae, Heteroclitae, Crypturi, Gallinje, and part of the
Accipitres ; Part XII completes the Accipitres and Striges, and includes
a large part of the Herodiones. — J. A. A.
North's Nests and Eggs of Australian Birds. — A second edition of Mr.
Alfred J. North's Nests and Eggs of Australian and Tasmanian Birds* is
being issued in parts, of which Part 1 appeared in June, 1901, Part II in
April, 1902, and Part III in April, 1903. The size is full quarto, and it is
tastefully printed on heavy paper, with colored plates and many figures of
nests, heads, and full-length figures of the birds in the text. Part I
contains the Corvidse, and part of the Paradiseidae, which occupy the
greater portion of Part II. Then follow the Campophagidue, completed
in Part II, and the great family Muscicapidie runs through Part III.
Descriptions are first given of the birds, with a few bibliographical refer-
ences, and a statement of the range. Then follows the biographical matter,
' On the Position occupied by the Legs of Birds during Flight. By G. E. H.
Barrett-Hamilton. The Zoologist, April, 1903, pp. 139-149. Also separate,
repaged.
' Nests and Eggs of Birds found Breeding in Australia and Tasmania. By
Alfred J. North, C. M. Z. S., Ornithologist, Australian Museum. (Second edi-
tion of Catalogue No. XII, entirely rewritten, with additions.) Printed by
order of the Trustees of the Australian Museum; R. Ethridge, Jr., J. P., Cura-
tor (= Australian Museum, Sydney. Special Catalogue, No. I.) Part I, pp.
1-36, pll. Ai, Bi, June 11, 1901 ; Part II, pp. 37-120, pll. B2, B3, B4, April
25, 1902 ; Part III, pp. 121-201, pll. A2, A3, A4, April 27, 1903.
122 ' Recent Literature. F jiSr
often quite extended, dealing with the general habits of the species as well
as its nest and eggs. Naturally much space is given to the hittorv of the
Bower-birds, with illustrations of their bowers as well as of their nests
and eggs. The work is admirable in design, and Mr. North's well-known
attainments as an authority on the Australian ornis is a guaranty of thor-
oughness in the execution of this great undertaking. — J. A. A.
Madarazs's Birds of Hungary.' — This forms a quarto volume of about
700 pages, illustrated with nine plates, most of them colored, and 170
text figures, mostly of heads and structural details. It is published,
unfortunately for English readers, in the Hungarian language, but there
is a summary of the work in German, forming nearly one third of the
volume. This is a systematic, annotated list of the 364 species authentic-
ally recorded as found in Hungary, with a statement of their manner of
occurrence and distribution, with references to the main text where thev
are fully described, with synonymy and other technical details. The
work is by a master, and must prove of great convenience and importance
to students of the Hungarian ornis. It is published by the National Mus-
eum at Budapest, and is in every way a most creditable example of book-
making. It originally appeared in fifteen parts, issued at irregular inter-
vals from October, 1899, to April, 1903. — J. A. A.
Seth-Smith's Handbook of Parrakeets. — Parts I-V of this attructi\e
work * have appeared during the last year. It relates especially, a* the
title indicates, to such species as are kept in captivity, and the>»e arc
very numerous. The external characters of the species are given brietly.
with some account of their distribution and habits, but more special retcr-
ence is made to their habits, hardiness, etc., in captivity, and their proper
food and treatment under such artiticial conditions. In some ca*«es quite
extended accounts are given of their habits in their native wilds. Some
five pages are given to the history of our "Carolina Conure," as here
called, which, in view of its approaching extermination has a sad inter-
est. The 17 colored plates thus far issued give very satisfactory figures
*A Magyar Nemzeti Muzeum Kiadvdnya. Magyarorszag Madarai. .\
Ilazai Madarviliig Megismeresenek Vez^rfolnala. 170 Eredeti szovegrajzzal
4s 9 MUmell^klettel. Irta Dr. Madar^sz Gyula. M. N. Muzeumi Igazgatoor.
Anhang : Die Vogel Ungamsauszug in Deutscher Sprache. Budapest. \^/)-
1903. Ara 40 korona. 410, pp. xxiv -|- 666, pll. ix, and 170 text figures.
'Parrakeets: being a practical Handbook to those Species kept in Cap-
tivity. Royal 8vo, to be completed in 6 parts, with text figures and colored
plates. London: R. H. Porter. Price, 6s net per part. Part I, June, 1902,
pp. 1-40, 4 pll.; Part II, August. 1902. pp. 41-80, 3 pll.; Part III. Dec,
1902, pp. 81-128, 3 pll.; Part IV, April, 1903, pp. 129-168, 3 pll.; Part V. pp.
169-216, 4 pll.
^^\<^ ] Recemf Literature, 323
of 28 species, and there are many excellent full-length text cuts of addi-
tional species. The book will have much interest as a popular account
of a very attractive group of birds, and will be, of course, of special value
to aviculturalists. — J. A. A.
Shufeldt on the Osteology of the SteganopodesJ — In a quarto memoir
of over one hundred pages, illustrated with numerous text figures and
ten half-tone plates. Dr. Shufeldt here presents at length the results of
his studies of the osteology and relationships of the Steganopodes. He
first summarizes the classifications proposed for the group by previous
authors and their views as to the relationships of the several types com-
posing the group, and then proceeds to a detailed comparative description
of the osteology of Phaethon^ Sula^ Anhinga^ Phalacrocorax^ Pelecanus^
and Fregata. He closes with some remarks on the classification of the
several types composing the order, which he divides into three super-
families (Pelecanoidea, Phaethontoidea, Fregatoidea), the first embracing
the families Pelecanids, Phalacrocoracida?, Anhingida;, and Sulida*, the
others comprising each a single family, consisting respectively of the
genera Pha'etkon and Fregata. Of the other families, each is also mono-
typic, as regards genera, except Phalacrocoracida;, to which are referred
the two genera Phalacrocorax and Nannopterum. His arrangement thus
agrees with Dr. Stejneger's, proposed in 1882, and followed in the A. O.
U. Check-List. — J. A. A.
Shufeldt on the Classification of Certain Groups of Birds.* — The groups
are the * superorders* Archornithiformes (consisting of ArchtEOpieryx)^ the
Dromxognathse (comprising the Ostriches, Rheas, Emues. and Casso-
waries, and the extinct Moas and the Roc (.<£/y<? /•««), and the Odonto-
holca: (the extinct Hesperornithidae and ^-Enaliornithidic. Extended
quotations are given from Huxley, Forbes, the Parkers (W. K. and T.
J.), Marsh, and others, from which sources a summary of the structural
characters of the diverse members composing these groups is here pre-
sented. The superorder Archornithiformes equals the 'subclass * Saururae
of many recent authors ; the superorder Dromajognathie includes all
the existing and extinct struthionine birds, and is divided into five 'sub-
orders \ as follows : Struthiornithes, Rheornithes, Casuariornithes, Din-
ornithes, and ^pyornithes. Each of these is treated at considerable
length, their difterential characters noted, and those of their constituent
' The Osteology of the Steganopodes. By R. \V. Shufeldt, M. D. Mem-
oirs of the Carnegie Museum. Vol. I, No. 3, 1903, pp. 109-223, pll. xxi-xxx,
and 37 text figures.
^On the Classification of Certain Groups of Birds. (Superorders: Arch-
ornithiformes; Dromaeognathse ; Odontoholcse). By R. W. Shufeldt. Amer.
Nat., Vol. XXX VII, Jan., 1903, pp. 33-64, and 2 half-tone plates.
2 24 Recent Literature. [ jjj
families. The *8uperorder ' Odontoholcse embraces the family He^pcror-
nithidse, of the Middle Cretaceous of Kansas and Colorado, and provi-
sionally the Enaliornithidse of the Upper Greensand. Both groups are
considered as probably ancestral forms of the Pygopodes. — J. A. A.
Publiqiitions Received. — Bangs, Outram. (i) A New Race of the
Carolina Chickadee from Southern Florida. (Proc. N. Engl. Zool. Club,
IV, March, 1903, pp. 1, 2.) (2) A New Wren from San Miguel Island.
Bay of Panama. {Ibid.^ pp. 3* 4-) (3) The Louisiana Cardinal. {Ibid.^
pp. 5-7.) (4) A New Race of Vireosylvia josepha from Chiriqui. {Ibid.^
pp. 9, 10.) (5) Stejneger^s Catalogue of Birds thus far recorded from the
Liu Kiu Islands, Japan, revised with additions to date. {Ibid.^ Feb. 1903,
pp. 93-97.) (6) Description of a New Thrush from Chiriqui. {IbiJ.. pp.
91, 92.) (7) Description of a New Race of the Great Blue Heron from
the Galapagos Islands. {Ibid.,^ pp. 99, 100.) (8) Description of a New
Subspecies of Manacus candei (Parzud.). {Ibid.^ pp. 105, 106.) (9) A
New Race of Scotothoru^ vercepacis from Chiriqui. {/bid.., pp. 103, 104.)
Barrett- Hamilton, G. £. II. On the Position occupied by the Legs of
Birds during Flight. (Zoologist, 1903, pp. 139-149; also separate, repagcd.)
Dutcher, William. (1) Nighthawk (C>l^r</«7c5 Wr^/iriVzir«5). (National
Committee of Audubon Societies, Leaflet No. i.) (2) The Mourning Dove
{Zentiidura carol inetisis), {Ibid..^ No. 2.) (3) The Meadowlark. {/bid..,
No. 3.) (4) The Robin, {/bid. No. 4.)
Elrod, Morton J. A Biological Reconnoissance in the Vicinity of Flat-
head Lake. (Bull. University of Montana, Biolog. Ser., No. 3.)
Finsch, O. (i) Zur Catalogisirung der ornithologischcn Abthcilung.
X. IndicatoriiKu. (Notes from the Leyden Museum, XXVIII, pp. i')j-
'79-) (-) l-'t'ber einen neuen Nashornvogel der Gattung PeHelopuits
Reichb. {/bid., pp. 190-194.) (3) Uebcr die Arten* der Buccrotiden Gat-
tung Ortkolophu$ Cjfant. {/bid.^ pp. 195-205.) (4) I'ebor zwei bi«»her
verkannle Arten : Pitta angolensis \\e\\\. wnd P. pulitk Fraser. {/bid.,
p. 206-212.)
Fisher, A. K. A Partial List of the Birds of Keam Canyon. Arizona.
(Condor, V, No. 2, 1903, pp. 33-36.)
Howe, Rci,nnald lleber, Jr. A List of the Birds of Florida. (Contr. to
N. Am. Orn., 1. 1903, pp. 39-42.)
Madar^sz, Julius von. (1) Magyarorszdg Madarai. 4to, pp. xxxiit -f
606, pi. i-ix aiui many text cuts. Budapest : National MuKeum. iSy9-
1903. (2) X'orliiufi^cs iiber einen neuen Rohrsiinger {/^usciniola mimicn).
McGregor, Richard C (i) Notes on a small collection of Birds from
the Island of Maui, Hawaii. (Condor, IV, 1902, pp. 59-62.) (2) A List
of Birds collected in Norton Sound, Alaska, {/bid.., 135-144.)
Meams, Edgar A. (i) Description of a New Swallow from the West-
ern United States. (Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., XV, 1902, pp. 31, 32.) (2)
Feathers beside the Styx. (Condor, V, 1903, pp. 36-38.)
Mearns, Louis di Z. A List of the Birds observed on the Island of
^^w ^] Recent Literature, 325
Rhode Island and the adjacent waters. (Notes on R. I. Orn., Ill, Nos.
2-4, 1902.)
Meyer, A. B. (i) Neue Vogel von Celebes. (Notes from the Lej^den
Museum, XXIII, pp. 185-189.) (2) On the eggs of the Moa. (Ibis, April,
»903» PP- 188-196.)
North, Alfred J. Nests and Eggs of Birds found Breeding in Australia
and Tasmania. Second Ed. Parts 1-3. 4to, with plates. Australian
Museum, Sydney.
Sanford, Leonard C, L. B. Bishop and T. S. Van Dyke. The Water-
Fowl Family. 8vo, pp. viii -f- 598, illustrated. The Macmillan Company
London and New York, 1903. Price, $2.00.
Scott, W. E. D. The Story of a Bird Lover. 8vo, pp. xii -f 322. The
Outlook Company, New York, 1903. Price, $1.50.
Seth-Smith, David. Parakeets. Parts 4 and 5, April and June, 1903.
London : R. H. Porter.
Shufeldt, R. W. Osteology of the Steganopodes. (Mem. Carnegie
Museum, I, No. 3, pp. 109-223, pU. xxi-xxx.)
Snow, Francis H. A Catalogue of the Birds of Kansas. Fifth Edition,
8v6, pp. 23, May, 1903.
Stone, Witmer. A Collection of Birds from Sumatra, obtained by
Alfred C Harrison, Jr., and Dr. H. M. Miller. (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Phila., 1902, pp. 670-691, Jan. 20, 1903.)
Stone, Witmer, and James A. G. Rehn. On the Terrestrial Vertebrates
of Portions of New Mexico and Western Texas. (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Phila., 1903, pp. 16-34. May 7. 1903.)
Walter, Herbert Eugene, and Alice Hall Walter. Wild Birds in City
Parks. Revised Ed. A. W. Mumford, Chicago, Price, 25 cts.
American Ornithology, III, Nos. 4-6, April-June, 1903.
Annals of Scottish Nat. Hist., No. 46, April, 1903.
Atlantic Slope Naturalist, The, I, Nos. i, 2, 1903.
Avicultural Magazine, New Ser., I, Nos. 6-8. April-June, 1903.
Bird- Lore, V, Nos. 2, 3, 1903.
Birds and Nature, XIV, April-June, 1903.
Boletim do Museu Parense, III, Nos. 3, 4, 1902.
BuUetin British Orn. Club, XIII, Nos. XCVI-XCVIII, 1903.
Bulletin of the Michigan Orn. Club, IV, No. i, March, 1903.
Bulletin of the Wisconsin Nat. Hist. Soc, II, No. 4, Oct. 1902.
Bulletins of the Philippine Museum, Nos. 1 and 2, 1903.
Condor, The, V, Nos. 2 and 3, 1903.
Bmu, The, II, No. 4, April, 1903.
Forest and Stream, LX, Nos. 13-26, 1903.
Journal of the Maine Orn. Society, V, No. 2, April, 1903.
Knowledge, XXVI, Nos. 210-212, April-June, 1903.
Naturalist, 'the, A Monthly Journ. of Nat. Hist, for North of England,
Nos. 555-557. April-June, 1903.
Omithologische Monatsberichte, XI, Nos. 4-6, April-June, 1903.
326
Notes and News. [^^
Omithologische Monatsschrift, XXVIII, Nos. 1-5, Jan.-Mav, 1903.
Omitholisches Jahrbuch, XIV, Heft 3-4, June, 1903.
Ottawa Naturalist, XVII, Nos. 1-3, April-June, 1903.
Our Animal Friends, XXX, Nos. 8-10, April-June, 1903.
Proceedings Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Part 3, 1902 (1903).
Proceedings of the Nebraska Ornithologists' Union, Third Ann. Meet-
ing, 1902.
Proceedings and Transactions of the Nova Scotia Inst, of Science X.
Part 4, March, 1903.
Revista do Museu Paulista, V, iqo2.
Wilson Bulletin, The, X, Nos. i and 2, March and June, 1903.
Science, N. S., XVII, Nos. 429-443, 1903.
Wombat, The, V, No. 4,-Dec. 1902.
Zoological Quarterly, I, No. 1, May 15, 1903 (Pennsylvania Depart, of
Agriculture).
Zoologist, The, (4) VII, Nos. 76-78, April-June, 1903.
NOTES AND NEWS.
Thomas Edwards Slevin, an Associate of the American Ornitholo-
gist's Union, died at his home in San Francisco on December 23, iqoj, in
his 32nd year. lie was born in New York City on January 20, 1S71. A
year of his early ciiildhood was spent in France. In 1878 he removed
with his parents to San Francisco. He came of a race of student>. Iwlh
on his mother's side, Bruguiere, and on his father's side, llis father.
Thomas Edwards Slevin, LL. D., was vice-president of the Geoj^raphi-
cal Society of the Pacific.
The genius to make collections was strongly developed in the Slexin
family. Mr. Slevin's grandfather gathered a large library, and hi* father
collected the Slevin Library of works relating chietly to the Pacific coa^t
— now a part of the public library of San Francisco.
Mr. Slevin*s interest in birds dated from his thirteenth year, when he
made his first attempt at forming a collection. In later years, he attained
a very high dej^ree of skill in the preparation of specimens; in the smaller
birds, his specimens, for durability and beauty of finish, are not excelled
by the work of the leading preparalors in this country. To the very la«t
he was eager to improve in his methods. His collection of birds numbered
about three thousand specimens, and was built up in leisure momentK
after otlice hours, on holidays, and during vacations. It is now incorpo-
rated with the studv series of the California Academy of Sciences and if
a monument to his earnest effort.
^°!w^] ^^^^^ ""^ News. 327
Mr. Slevin received his school education at St. Ignatius College, San
Francisco. From his father and mother, he learned to speak French
fluently. He was a member of the California Academy of Sciences, its
Section of Ornithology, and the Cooper Ornithological Club.
He had in a marked degree that inborn gift to recognize at a glance
and remember the differences in specimens. An exotic species once seen,
its characters were indelibly fixed in his mind. If ornithology had been
to him a profession, rather than his recreation, he would have attained
distinction as a systematic ornithologist. He loved ornithology for the
t»ake of ornithology — not for scientific eminence or for position. Within
a few days of his death, in the closing hours of a long, painful illness, he
had his mother read to him the bird portion of 'North American Fauna
No. 22,* which had just reached him. Two days before the end, he told me,
with a smile, that Ridgway had come, meaning he had received Part II of
•* The Birds of North and Middle America.'
Mr. Slevin*s preeminent characteristic was truthfulness ; he was a man
whose word could be absolutely relied upon. — L. M. L.
George H. Ready, an Associate of the American'' Ornithologists'
Union, died at his home in Santa Cruz, California, March 20, 1903, in
his 45th year. From a notice of Mr. Ready in • The Condor * (V, p. 82)
we learn that he was born in Placerville, Placer County, California,
August 5, 1858, but while still a boy went to Santa Cruz, which became
his permanent home. "Four years ago, from overwork and exposure, he
contracted a cold from which he never recovered. He spent several years
in Phoenix, Arizona, hoping the dry air of that region would restore his
health. But he afterwards wisely concluded that the comforts of a home
in Santa Cruz would be a greater solace and quite as likely a restorer ....
He was an amateur ornithologist, and the birds of the region in and about
Santa Cruz and Phoenix were his familiar friends, few knowing their
haunts as wel^ as he."
Mrs. E. S. Mogridge, well known in this country and in England as a
modeler of plant accessories for bird groups, and for groups illustrating
the life history of insects injurious to forest trees, died at Springfield,
Mass., April 5, 1903. While at this writing we know little of her early
personal history, it is proper that some record should be here made of
her services to science, through her facsimile reproductions of foliage,
flowers, and other plant accessories for various American Museums. In
this she was assisted by her brother, Mr. H. Mintorn. They first worked
on accessories for insect groups for Lord Walsingham, and for bird
groups at the South Kensington Museum, London, where, about 1885 or
1886, their work attracted the attention of Mr. Morris K. Jesup, Presi-
dent of the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Mrs.
Mogridge frequently visited New York, where she had many friends, and
3^8
NoUs and News, [J'^
while on a visit here in 1877, arrangements were made with her to astifrt
in the preparation of bird groups, and later insect groups, for the Ameri>
can Museum, and she was thus engaged, with her brother, at intervals
during the remainder of her life. Other museums also profited hv her
skill, including the U. S. Department of Agriculture at Washington, the
Carnegie Museum at Pittsburgh, the Field Columbian Museum at Chi-
cago, the Brooklvn Institute, and the Natural History Museum at Spring-
field, Mass., where she left uncompleted work. The late Mr<i. R. L.
Stuart of New York City was one of her warm friends and patrons, Mr*.
Stuart generously providing the means for the construction of a large
series of bird groups for the American Museum. Mrs. Mogridge was a
woman of rare skill in her special line of work, exceedingly conscientioub,
and personally a most agreeable and cultured woman. The last twenty
years of her life were passed in America, with occasional visits to Eng-
land. She imparted her art to a considerable number of student^. wIhi
came to her for instruction, so that the kind of work she first introduced
in this country is now carried on at quite a number of our larger
museums.
The Atlantic Slope Naturalist, edited and published bimonthly
at Nazereth, Pa., by W. E. Rotzell, M. D., is among the later new aspi-
rants to fame, of which two numbers have thus far appeared. No. i. tor
March-April, and No. 2, for May-June. Although general in scope, as
its name implies, the first two numbers are mainly ornithological, and
contain bird notes of general interest. The editorial announcement state*'
that "It will be devoted to natural history in general and that of the Kakt-
ern United States in particular." It is intended as "a medium through
which observations may be recorded, opinions may be exp^e^sed, qu<r«»-
tions may be asked, and specimens announced for exchange." The swh-
scription price is 30 cts. a year.
A NEW journal called ' The Zoological Quarterly * has made its appear
ance, Volume I, No. i, bearing date May 15, 1903. It is edited b\ I!. A.
Surface, M. S., Economic Zoologist of the Department of Agriculture of
Pennsylvania, and is to be issued quarterly from his office at Harri-^bui;:,
Pa., as an official medium of publication.
The first number, also bears the title 'Zoological Circular. No. i,' and
carries the general title ' Birds around the Farm,' with the subheading*^ :
'1. Bird Houses and Nesting Sites ' (illustrated) ; * II. Their Economic
Value, Destruction and Preservation ' ; *III. Bird Study : Its Educational
Value and Methods.'
TiiK Anni AL Mketing of the Delaware Valley Ornithological Club
was held at the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, January 1,
1903.
^w^T ^*^*^^ ^^^ AVwi. 329
Sixteen meetings were held during 1902, with an average attendance
of eighteen ; forty-six members attending one or more of the meetings
during the year.
The Club has undertaken a study of the spring bird migration in the
Delaware Valley with very satisfactory results and by soliciting the coop-
eration of any competent observers has brought itself in touch with a
large number of bird students not included in its membership.
The more important papers of the year were, * Gulls and Terns of the
Maine Coast/ by W. L. Baily ; * The G#rmantown Grackle Roost/ by
A. C. Emlen ; * A Trip to Chihuahua, Mcx., by Dr. W. E. Hughes; » An
Expedition to southern New Mexico/ by J. A. G. Rehn ; * Some Old
Testament Birds/ by S. N. Rhoads ; 'The 1^2 Flight of White Herons/
by W. B. Evans.
The second number of * Cassinia/ covering the proceedings of 1902,
was issued in February.
The officers for the present year are : President, C J. Pennock ; Vice-
President, Wm. A. Shryock ; Secretary, Wm. B. Evans; Treasurer,
Stewardson Brown.
Thk Fourth Annual Meeting of the Nebraska Ornithologists'
Union was held in Lincoln, Neb., January 24, 1903, on which occasion
the following papers were read : President's address — * Birds and Man/
Rev. J. M. Bates; • Educational Value of Bird Study,' Mrs. C. S. Lobin-
gier ; • Devices for Interesting Children in Bird Study,' Miss Anna Cald-
well; 'Observations on the Number of Birds to the Square Mile in Cus-
ter County/ Rev. J. M. Bates; * The Crow in Nebraska/ Wilson Tout :
•The Birds of the Niobrara Valley,' Myron Swenk ; 'Birds of Cherry
County, Neb.,' Dr. R. H. Wolcott ; 'Remarks on a Record of Nebraska
Ornithology/ Dr. R. H. Wolcott.
The following officers were elected: President, F. H. Shoemaker,
Omaha; Vice-President, Miss Anna Caldwell, Lincoln; Corresponding
Secretary, J. C. Crawford, Jr., West Point ; Recording Secretary and Edi-
tor (permanent). Dr. R. H. Wolcott, University of Nebraska ; Treasurer,
Mr. August Eiche, Lincoln. The office of Custodian was created as a
permanent office and Myron Swenk, of Lincoln, appointed to fill it.
Newly elected members raised the total membership of the society to
nearly two hundred.
The presentation of a considerable amount of material, including many
skins on which records are based, was reported, and it was resolved to
secure, if possible, for the collection, all the material in the State, upon
which the past records of the occurrence of rare birds in Nebraska had
been based.
A committee was appointed to complete the formal organization of the
Audubon Auxiliary and to put in definite shape terms of affiliation
between it and the Union.
2 3 O Notts a nd News. \ y^
Mr. William H. Kobb£, Yale Forest School, New Haven, Conn., U
preparing a paper entitled * Birds in Their Relation to Forestrj,' and
would be very grateful for any information from the readers of *The
Auk^ concerning this subject. He wishes particularly notes regarding
the action of birds in the dissemination of seeds and in the destruction of
injurious /bre5/ insects. The opinion of ornithologists in regard to the
benefit or the reverse of Woodpeckers to the forest would also prove of
value. All information used will of course be acknowledged by the
author.
From the recently published Seventh Annual Report of the New York
Zoological Society we learn that during the year 1902 the bird collection
was not sensibly increased, owing to the fact that no additional buildingN
or aviaries could be provided, the construction of the proposed Ostrich
House having been necessarily deferred. A number of important species
were added, however, and the successful breeding of several species ik
announced. The attempt to colonize the Osprey, through the introduc-
tion of a nest and some young birds from Gardner^s Island, in a state of
freedom within the Park proved a failure. As soon as the young birds
acquired the power of strong flight "they flew away and failed to return.**
Similar efforts with young gulls were also unsuccessful. Several species
of wild ducks, however, as the Wood Duck, Mallard, Widgeon, and Red-
head are frequently seen about the pools in the Park and several species
of herons are observed, attracted by their relatives in the great Flving
Cage. The number of species in the bird collection on December 31,
1902, was 193, represented by 680 individuals.
In this same volume (pp. 154-159) the Curator of the Department of
Birds, Mr. C William Beebe, has an interesting paper entitled, * Some
Notes on the Psychology of Birds.' It is a pleasure to note that the
fine opportunity here offered for this kind of research is being so intelli-
gently utilized.
Thk eggs ok the Moa forms the subject of an interesting paper in
* The Ibis ' for April (Ibis, 1903, pp. 188-196), by Dr. A. B. Meyer, in
which he gives the history and present ownership of four nearly perfect
Moa's eggs, which represent three species ; also four more or less imper-
fect eggs, and models of five others. The eight of which the localities are
known are all from South Island, New Zealand. Dr. Mever savs: "Moa'iT
eggs are very much rarer than those of ^Hpyornis^ thirty-six of the latter
being known, whereas only three or four perfect Moa's eggs are as^^et
recorded, besides a dozen or more imperfect or reconstructed specimens."
The eggs vary greatly in dimensions, the largest, "a nearly perfect "egg
of Dinornis novat telanui<s Owen, in the Rowley Collection, measuring
252 by 178 mm. .and a perfect ^^^oi Packyornis eUphmntopus *^ 195 b\ 13 q
mm. "Owen constructed the egg of Dinornis maximus to 412 by 326 mm."
Voi. XX
1903
] Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. 33 I
TWELFTH SUPPLEMENT TO THE AMERICAN
ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION CHECK-LIST OF
NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS.^
Two sessions of the Committee liave been held in Washington
since the appearance of the last Supplement. At the first meet-
ing (November 21, 1902) questions of generic and subgeneric
rank only were considered, and much progress was made toward
eliminating these from the category of deferred cases. In April
(16 to 18) of the present year a longer meeting was held, at which
many additional cases were discussed, but action on certain gen-
eric names (^. g,^ Horizopus) was again postponed, owing to lack
of time for their proper consideration.
The list of deferred cases is still formidable, but it is hoped that
at the next meeting of the Committee the number of such cases will
be very materially reduced.
^C. Hart Merriam, Chairman,
J. A. Allen.
William Brewster.
Jonathan Dwight, Jr.
Charles W. Richmond.
Robert Ridgwav.
LWiTMER Stone.
I. ADDITIONS TO THE CHECK-LIST AND ACCEPTED
CHANGES IN NOMENCLATURE.
^Ga. Fnlmams glacialis minor (Kjaerbcelling). This is
eliminated from the Check-List as indistinguishable from F,
glacialis, the alleged characters being the result of sexual or
^ Four Supplements have been issued since the publication of the Second
Edition of the Check-List in 1895 :
Eighth Supplement, Auk, XIV, 1897, pp. 1 17-135.
Ninth Supplement, Auk, XVI, 1899, pp. 97-133.
Tenth Supplement, Auk, XVIII, 1901, pp. 295-320.
Eleventh Supplement, Auk, XIX, 1902, pp. 315-342.
Committee.
332 Twelfth SuppUmtnito the A, O. U, Check-List. [JjJ^
individual variation. {Cf. Chapman, Bull. Aroer. Mus. N.
H., XII, 1899, 229.)
96.1. PnfEliiiis cuneatus Salvin.
"Wedge-tailed Shearwater.
Puffinus cuneatus Salvin, Ibis, 1888, 353.
[B— ,C— , R— ,C— .]
Geog. Dist. — North Pacific Ocean, from the Hawaiian
Islands north to the Bonin Group and Lower California. (Cf,
Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 30.)
96.2. PnfEliiiis bulleri Salvin.
New Zealand Shearwater.
Puffinus bulleri Salvin, Ibis, 1888, 354.
[B— ,C-, R— ,C-.]
Geog. Dist. — New Zealand, north casually to California. (Cf
LooMis, Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci., ser. 3 (Zool.), II, 1900, 319.)
193. Ardea "wardi Ridgw. This becomes a subspecies of
Ardea herodias, to stand as
1946. Ardea herodias ward! (Ridgway).
Ward's Heron.
Ardea 7vardi Ridgway, Bull. Nutt. Om. Club, VII, Jan.
1882, 5.
Ardea herodias 7vardi Chapman, Bull. Am. Mus. X. H., XIV,
1901, 89.
[B-, C— , R- C-.]
Gfx)G. Dist. — Florida, possibly extending along the Gulf Coast
to Texas. (Cf, Chapman, Bull. Amer. Mus. N. H., XIV. 1901,
88.)
The various subgenera of Ardeidne in the Check-List are
raised to generic rank, as follows :
^*w^ Twelfth Supplement to the A, O. U. CheckrList. 333
Genus HERODIAS Boie.
Herodias Boie, Isis, 1822, 559. Type, by elimination, Ardea
egretta Gmelin.
The only North American species will stand as
196. Herodias egretta (Gmelin).
Ardea egretta Gmelin, S. N., I, ii, 1788, 629.
Herodias egretta Cabanis, Journ. f. Om., 1856, 341.
Genus EORETTA Forster.
Egretta Forster, Synop. Cat. Brit. Birds, 181 7, 59. Type,
Ardea garzetta LiNNiCUs.
Egretta is equivalent to Garzetta of the Check-List, over which
name it has priority, Garzetta Kaup dating from 1829, and
Egretta Forster from 1817.
197. Egretta candidissima (Gmelin).
Ardea candidissima Gmelin, S. N., I, ii, 1788, 633.
Egretta candtdissima Gosse, Birds Jamaica, 1847, 336.
Genus DICHROMANASSA Ridgway.
Dichromanassa Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Geol. & Geogr. Surv.
Terr., IV, 1878, 246. Type, Ardea rufa Boddaert.
198. DichromanasBa mfescens (Gmelin).
Ardea rufescens Gmelin, S. N., I, ii, 1788, 628.
Dichromanassa rufescens A. O. U. Committee.
334 Twelfth SufpUmtnt to the A, O, U. Check-List, [ Jjj^
Genus HYDRANASSA Baird.
Hydranassa Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858, 660.
Type, Ardea ludoviciana Wilson (= Egrctta ruficollis
Gosse).
199. Hydranassa tricolor mflcoUis (Gosse).
Egretta ruficollis GossE, Birds Jamaica, 1847, 338.
Hydranassa tricolor ruficollis A. O. U. Committee.
Genus FLORIDA Baird.
Florida Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858, 671. Type,
Ardea cctrulea LiNNiEUS.
200. Florida ctemlea (LiNNiSus).
Ardea cctrulea LiNNiCUS, S. N. ed. 10, I, 1758, 143.
Florida carulea Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858, 671.
Genus BUTORIDES Blyth.
Butorides Blyth, Cat. Birds Mus. Asiat. Soc, 1849 (>852),
281. Type, Ardea javanica Horsfield.
201. Butorides viresoens (Linnaeus).
Ardea virescetis LiNNwtus, S. N. ed. 10, I, 1758, 144.
Butorides virescens Bonaparte, Consp. Av., II, 1855, 128.
201^1. Butorides viresoens frasari (Brewster) .
Ardea virescens frazari Brewster, Auk, V, Jan. 1888, 83.
Butorides virescens frazari A. O. U. Committee.
2016. Butorides viresoens anthonyi (Mearns).
Ardea virescens anthonyi Mearns, Auk, XII, July, 1895, 257.
Butorides virescens anthonyi A. O. U. Committee.
^^1;^^] Twelfth Suppiemeftt to the A, O. U, Check-List. 335
Genus NTCTANASSA Stejneger.
Nyctanassa Stejneger, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., X, 1887, 295.
Type, Ardea violacea LinnjEUs.
208. NyctanasBa violacea (LiNNiCus).
Ardea violacea Linnaeus, S. N. ed. 10, I, 1758, 143.
Nyctanassa violacea Sharpe, Bull. Brit. Orn. Club, V, 1895,
XI.
The following groups of Limicols are given full generic rank
{cf, Coues, Osprey, III, 1899, 144) :
Genus ARQTTATELIaA Baird.
Arquatella Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858, 717. Type,
Tringa maritima BrOnnich.
235. Arquatella maritima (Brunnich).
Tringa maritima BrCnnich, Orn. Borealis, 1764, 54.
Arquatella maritima Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1861, 183.
236. Arquatella couesi Ridgway.
Arquatella couesi Ridgway, Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, V, July,
1880, 160.
237. Arquatella ptUocnemis (Coues).
Tringa ptilocnemis Coues, Elliott's Rept. Seal Isl. Alaska,
1873 (not paged).
Arquatella ptilocfumis Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Ill,
1880, 199.
Genus ACTODROMAS Kaup.
Actodromas Kaup, Skizz. Entw.-Gesch. Eur. Thierw., 1829,
55. Type, Tringa minuta Leisler.
336 Twelfth Supplement to the A, O. U. Check-List. \,^Sf
238. Actodromas acuminata (Horsfield).
Totanus acutninatus Horsfield, Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond.,
XIII, 1821, 192.
Actodromas acutninatus Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Ill,
1880, 199.
239. Actodromas macnlata (Vieillot).
Tringa maculata Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. d'Hist. Nat., XXXIV,
1819, 465.
Actodromas maculata Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1861, 197.
240. Actodromas foscicoUis (Vieillot).
Tringa fuscicoUis Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. d'Hist. Nat., XXXIV,
1819, 461.
Actodromas fuscicoUis Bonaparte, Comptes Rendus, XLIII,
1856, 596.
241. Actodromas bairdii Coues.
Actodromas bairdii Coues, Proe. Aead. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1861,
194.
242. Actodromas minutilla (Vieillot).
Tringa minutilla Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. d'Hist. Nat., XXXIV,
1819, 466.
Actodromas minutilla Coues, Proe. Aead. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1861, 191.
[242.1.] Actodromas damacensis (Horsfield).
•
Totanus damacensis Horsfield, Trans. Linn. Soe. Lond.,
XIII, 1821, 192.
Actodromas damacensis Stejneger. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
VI, 1883, 71.
%
1
^^g«^] Twelfth SuppUmtnt to the A, O, U. Check-List. 337
Genus PELIDNA Cuvier.
Pelidna Cuvier, Rfegne Animal, I, 181 7, 490. Type, Tringa
alpina LiNNiCUS.
[243.] Pelidna alpina (LiNNiCus).
Tringa alpina LiNNiEUS, S. N. ed. 10, I, 1758, 149.
Pelidna alpina C. L. Brehm, Vog. Deutschl., 1831, 661.
243a. Pelidna alpina paciflca (Coues).
Pelidna pacifica Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1861,
189.
Pelidna alpina pacifica Stejneger, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
VIII, 1885, 120.
Genus EROLIA Vieillot.
Erolia Vieillot, Analyse, 18 16, 55. Type, Erolia variegata
Vieillot (= Tringa ferruginea BrCnnich).
244: Erolia ferruginea (BrCnnich).
Trif^a ferruginea BrOnnich, Om. Bor., 1764, 53.
Erolia ferruginea A. O. U. Committee.
Erolia replaces Ancylocheilus (Kaup, 1829) of the Check-List.
It refers unquestionably to the Curlew Sandpiper, although
described and figured by Vieillot as a three-toed species.
Genus OX7ECHIJS Reichenbach.
Oxyechus Reichenbach, Syst. Av., 1852, xviii. Type
Charadrius vociferus LiNNitus.
273. Oxyechns vocifema (Linnaeus).
Charadrius vociferus LiNNiEUS, S. N. ed. 10, 1, 1758, 150.
Oxyechus vociferus Reichenbach, Syst. Av., 1852, xviii.
338 Twelfth Supplement to the A, O, U. Ckeck-List. [ ^^
Genus OCHTHODROMTJS Reichenbach.
Ochthodromus Reichenbach, Syst. Av., 1852, xviii. Type,
Charadrius wiisonia Ord.
280. Ochthodromns wilsonins (Ord).
Charadrius wiisonia Ord, in Wilson's Am. Orn., IX, 18 14,
77» Pl- 73> fig- 5-
Ochthodromus wilsonius Reichenbach, Syst. Av., 185 2,
XVllI.
Genus PODASOC7S Coues.
Podasocys Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1866, 96.
Type, Charadrius montanus Towns end.
281. PodasocjTB montanns (Townsend).
Charadrius montanus Townsend, J cum. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Phila., VII, 1837, 192.
Podasocys montanus Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1866, 96.
296. Cjrrtonyz montezumte (Vigors). This becomes
296. C3rrtoiiyz montezumce meaxnsi Nelson.
Mearns's Partridge.
Cyrtonyx montezumce mearnsi Nelson, Auk, XVII, July,
1900* 255.
[B Ml, part, C Z^\,part, R 485, /^r/, C 578, /^r/.]
Geog. Dist. — Western Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona, south
into Mexico. (C/I Nelson, Auk, 1900, 225.)
810a. Meleagris gallopavo fera (Vieillot). In the first
edition of the *Nouveau Dictionnaire' (Vol. IX) Vieillot used
the name Meleagris siivestris, which was later changed to
Af. fera {cf. Sherborn, Auk, 1902, 419-420). The latter
^^^^] Twelfth SupfUmtntto the A, O, U. Check- List. 33^
name was inadvertently adopted by the Committee in the
Ninth Supplement, but should now be replaced by
dlOa. MeleagrlB gallopavo silvestris (Vieillot).
Meleagris silvestris Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. d*Hist. Nat., IX,.
1817, 447.
Meleagris gallopavo sy Ives tr is Allen, Auk, XIX, 1902, 420*
[322.] Qaotrygon chxysia (Bonaparte). The authority and
reference should be corrected to
[322.] Qaotrygon chrjrsia Salvadori.
Geotrygon chrysia Salvadori, Cat. Birds Brit. Mys., XXI,.
1S931 571 ((/"• RiLBY, Auk, 1902, 397).
337c. Buteo borealis Incasanns Ridgway. This is found
to be indistinguishable from Buteo borealis calurus^ and is to
be eliminated. {Cf, Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. ZodL,.
XLI, 1902, Z"^,^
Subgenus T1NNUNCX7LU8 Vieillot.
Tinnunculus Vieillot, Ois. Am. Sept., I, 1807, 39. Type^
by elimination, Falco columbarius LiNNiEus.
This should replace the subgenus yEsalon of the Check-List,,
and the subgenus Tinnunculus, for the Sparrow Hawks, will become
Subgenus CERCHNX2I8 Boie.
Cerchneis Boie, I sis, 1826, 970. Type, Fako rupicolus
Daudin. {Cf, Howe, Contr. N. Amer. Orn., I, 1902, 28.)
360a. Falco sparverins deserticoliis Mearns.
An earlier name for this subspecies is found in
360a. Falco sparverins phaloena (Lesson).
Tinnunculus phalana Lesson, Compl. CEuv. Buffon, XX,.
1847,. 178.
340 Tv/elfth SuppUmtmtto tht A. O. U. Ckeck-Lisi. [^^
Fako sparverius phaktna Nelson, Auk, XIX, Oct. 1902^398.
(Cy. Nelson, Auk, 1902, 398.)
368. Sjrminm nebulOBom (Forster). This name, which has
been in constant use for the Barred Owl, is found to apply
exclusively to the Great Gray Owl {cf, Preble, N. Am.
Fauna, No. 22. 1902, 109). The earliest available name for
the Barred Owl appears to be
368. Sjrminm varinm (Barton).
Strix varius Barton, Fragm. N. H. Penn., 1799, 11.
Symium varium Preble, N. Am. Fauna, No. 22, 1902, 109.
368a. Sjrminm varinm alleni fRioGWAv).
Strix nebulosa alleni Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Ill,
1880, 8.
Symium varium alleni Preble, N. Am. Fauna, No. 22, 1902,
109.
3686. Symium varinm helveolnm (Bangs).
Symium nebulosum helveolum Bangs, Proc. N. E. Zool. Club,
1, 1899, 31.
Symium varium helveolum Preble, N. Am. Fauna, No. 22,
1902, 109.
370. Scotiaptex cinerea (Gmelin). This becomes
370. Scotiaptex nebulosa (Forster).
Strix nebulosa Forster, Philos. Trans., LXII, 1772, 424.
Scotiaptex nebulosum Preble, N. Am. Fauna, No. 22, 1902,
109.
[870a.] Scotiaptex nebulosa lapponica (Thunberg).
Strix lapponica Thunber(;, K. Vet. Akad. nya Handl., XIX,
1798, 184.
Scotiaptex nebulosa lapponica A. O. U. Committee.
^wfT Twelfth SuppUmemtio the A. O, U, Check-List, 341
378.2. Megascops xantnsi Brewster.
Zantus's Screech Owl.
Afegascofs xantusi Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI,
1902, 93.
[B — , C — , R 403, /tfr/, C 470, /tfr/.]
Geog. Dist. — Cape Region of Lower California.
375€. Bubo virginianiis elachiBtus Brewster.
Dwarf Horned Owl.
Bubo virginianus eiachistus Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp.
Zool., XLI, 1902, 96.
[B— ,C— , R-, C-.]
Geog. Dist. — Lower California.
394€. Dryobates pnbescens turati (Malherbe).
"Willow Woodpecker.
Fiats turati Malherbe, Monogr. Picid^es, I, 186 1, 125, pi.
28.
Dryobates pubescens turati W. K. Fisher, Condor, IV, 1902,
68.
[B 77,/<7r/, C i^^a^part^ R 361^7, /<jr/, C 441, /^r/.]
Geog. Dist. — "California, except-, desert ranges and eastern
slope of Sierra Nevada, coast region north of Marion Co., and
region nortH of upper end of Sacramento Valley." (C/*. Fisher,
Condor, IV, 1902, 70.)
Subgenus ASYNDBSBCCTS Coues. This becomes
Genus ASTNDESMTJS Coues.
Asyndesmus CouES, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1866, 55.
Type, Picus torquatus Wilson.
408. Ajiyndetuniis torquatus (Wilson).
342 Twelfth Supplement to the A. O, U, Chech-List. ^^^
Picus torquaUis Wilson, Amer. Orn., Ill, 1811, 31, pi. xx,
fig- 3-
Asyntiesmus torquatus CouES, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1866, 56.
Subgenus CBNTURUS Swainson. This becomes
Genus CENTITRTTS Swainson.
Centurus Swainson, Classif. Birds, II, 1837, 310. Type,
Picus carolinus Linnaeus.
409. CenturuB carolinus (LiNNiCus).
Picus carolinus Linn/eus, S. N. ed. 10, I, 1758, 113.
Centurus carolinus Bonaparte, Geog. & Com p. List, 1838, 40.
410. Centnras aurifrons (Wagler).
Picus aurifrons Wagler, Isis, 1829, 512.
Centurus aurifrons Lichtenstein, Nomencl. Av., 1854, 76.
411. CenturuB uropygialis Baird.
Centurus uropygialis Baird, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1854, 120.
454^. MyiarchuB cinerascens pertinaz (Baird).
Lower California Flycatcher.
Myiarchus pertinax Baird, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
Myiarchus cinerascens pertinax Brewster, Bull. Mus. Com p.
ZooL, XLI, 1902, 117.
[B i^i, part, C 2^^, part, R iiz^part, C lll^part?^
Geog Dist. — Southern Lower California.
Subgenus NUTTALLORNIS Ridgway. This becomes
VoLXX-j Twelfth Supplement to the A, O, U, Chech-List, 343
Genus NUTTALLORNIS Ridgway.
Nuttallomis Ridgway, Man. N. Am. Birds, 1887, 337. Type,
Tyrannus borealis Swainson. {Cf, CouES, Osprey, III,
1899, 144.)
459. Nuttallomis borealis (Swainson).
Tyrannus borealis Swainson, Fauna Bor.-Amer., II, 1831,
Nuttallomis borealis Oberholser, Auk, XVI, Oct. 1899, ZZ^-
474a. Otocoris alpestris leucolsema (Coues), of the Check-
List, becomes
474a. Otocoris alpestris arcticola Orerholser.
Pallid Horned Lark.
Otocoris alpestris arcticola Oberholser, Proc. U. S. Nat.
Mus., XXIV, 1902, 816.
[B- C— , R— , C-.]
Geog. Dist. — **In summer, Alaska (chiefly the interior), with
the valley of the Upper Yukon River ; in winter, south to Oregon,
Utah, and Montana." {Cf, Oberholser, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
XXIV, 1902,816.)
474e. Otocoris alpestris arenicola Henshaw. This becomes
474c. Otocoris alpestris leucolsema (Coues).
Desert Horned Lark.
Eremophila alpestris b. leucolcema Coues, Birds N. W., 1874,
38.
Otocoris alpestris laicolcema Stejneger, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
V, 1882, 34.
[B— , Cs3*, R3ooa,C83.]
Geog. Dist. — Western United States, from central Dakota,
344 Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Ckeck-List. [f^^
western Kansas and western Nebraska to Idaho and Nevada,
north to Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Assiniboia, south in winter
to Colorado, Texas, southeastern California, and northwestern
Mexico.
474e. Otocoris alpestris chrysolsema (Waglerj. This
becomes
474e. Otocoris alpestris ^ctia Oberholser.
California Horned Lark.
Otocoris alpestris actia Oberholser, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
XXIV, 1902, 845.
[B — , C na.part^ R ^oob^part, C 84, /^r/.]
Geog. Dist. — " Coast region of northern Lower California and
of southern California north to San Francisco Bay, including the
San Joaquin Valley." (QC Oberholser, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus..
XXIV, 1902, 845). True chrysohema Wagler is conhned to
Mexico.
47 4A:. Otocoris alpestris hoyti Bishop.
Hoyt'B Horned Lark.
Otocoris alpestris hoyti Blshop, Auk, XIII, 1896, 130.
[B— , C— , R— . C— .]
Gkoo. Dist. — ** In summer British America from the west shore
of Hudson Bay to the valley of the Mackenzie River, north to the
Arctic coast, south to Lake Athabasca; in winter southward to
Nevada, l^tah, Kansas and Michigan, casually to Ohio and New
York (Long Island)." {Cf, Oberholskr, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mu>.,
XXIV, 1902, 812.)
474/. Otocoris alpestris occidentalis (McCall) .
Montezuma Horned Lark.
Otocoris 1 occidentalis Mc Call, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila..
1851, 218.
^"i^] T-^'flftf^ Suppiemeut to the A. O. U. Check-List. 345
Otocoris alpestris occidentalis Stone, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Phila., 1899, 21.
[B-, C-, R— , C— .]
Geog. Dist. — " In summer, central New Mexico, west to central
Arizona ; in winter, south to northern Sonora and Chihuahua,
Mexico, and southeast to Texas." ( Cf, Oberholser, Proc. U. S.
Nat. Mus., XXIV, 1902, 856.)
474f72. Otocoris alpestris insularis Townsend.
Island Homed Lark.
Otocoris alpestris insularis Townsend, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
XIII, 1890, 140.
[B-,C— , R-,C~.]
Geog. Dist. — Santa Barbara Islands, California.
475. Pica pica hudsonica (Sabine). This should be cor-
rected to
475. Pica pica hudsonia (Sabine), the latter being the origi-
nal spelling of the specific name.
482a. Aphelocoma sieberii couchii (Baird).
Couch'B Jay.
Cyanocitta couchii Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858,
588.
Aphelocoma sieberii couchi Oberhoi^er, Auk, XIX, 1902, 300.
[B— C— , R-, C— .]
Geog. Dist. — Northeastern Mexico to southwestern Texas
(Chisos Mountains). (Cf. Oberholser, Auk, XIX, [902, 300.)
501c. Stnmella magna argutnla Bangs.
Southern Meadowlark.
Stumella magna argutnla Bangs, Proc. N. E. Zool. Club, I,
1899, 20. 9
346 Twelfth Supplement to the A, O. U. Check-List. [JjJ
[B 406, /ar/, C 214,/rtr/, R 26^, part, C 320, /ar/.]
Geog. Dist. — Florida and the Gulf coast to Louisiana, north
through lower Mississippi Valley to southeastern Illinois, and
southwestern Indiana.
Subgenus MEOAQUISCALUS Cassin. This becomes
Genus MEOAQUISCALTTS Cassin.
Megaquiscalus Cassin, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1866,
409. Type, Quiscalus major Vieillot. (Cf, Ridgwav,
Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 235.)
513. MegaqniscaluB major (Vieillot).
Quiscalus major Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. d*Hist. Nat., XXVIII,
1819, 487.
Megaquiscalus major Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No.
50, pt. II, 1902, 235.
513a. MegaquiscaluB major macronms (Swainson).
Quiscalus macrourus Swainson, Anim. in Menag., 1838, 299.
Megaquiscalus major macrourus Riikjway, Bull. \} . S. Nat.
Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 235.
No. 512 of the Check-List thus becomes No. 513a, the serial
number 512 being eliminated.
Genus COCCOTHRAT7STES Bkisson. This is eliminated
from the Check-List.
Subgenus HESPERIPHONA. This becomes
Genus HESPERIPHONA Bonaparte.
Hesperiphona Bonaparte, Consp. Avium, I, 1850, 505.
Type, Fringilla vespertiriaW, Cooper. {Cf. Ridgway, Bull.
U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 57.)
^"liw^l rwe(/?il Supplement to the A. O, U. Check-List, 347
514. Hesperiphona vespertina (W. Cooper).
Fringilla vespertina W. Cooper, Ann. Lye. N. H. N. Y., I,
ii, 1825, 220.
Hesperiphona vespertina Bonaparte, Consp. Avium, I, 1850,
505-
514a. Hesperiphona vespertina montana Ridgway.
Hesperiphona vespertina var. montana Ridgway, in Hist. N.
Am. Birds, I, 1874, 449.
530a. AstragalinoB psaltria arisonse (Coues). This is
eliminated from the Check-List (as equivalent to No. 530) ,
the characters ascribed to it being due mainly to age or sea-
son. {Cf, Grinnell, Condor, 1902, 115, 116; Brewster,
Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 136.)
Subgenus PASSERCULUS Bonaparte. This becomes
Genus PASSERCXTLTTS Bonaparte.
Passerculus Bonaparte, Geog. & Comp. List, 1838, 33.
Type, Fringilla savanna Wilson. (Cf, Ridgway, Bull. U.
S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 187.)
541. PassercaloB princeps Maynard.
Passerculus princeps Maynard, Am. Nat. VI, 1872, 637.
542. Passerculus sandwichensis (Gmelin) .
Emberiza sandwichensis Gmelin, S. N., I, ii, 1788, 875.
Passerculus sandwichensis Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX,
1858, 444.
542a. Passerculus sandwichensis savanna (Wilson).
Fringilla savanna Wilson, Am. Orn., Ill, 181 1, 55, pi. 22,
fig. 2.
348 Twelfth Suf fitment to the A. O. U, Ckeck-Lisi. [J^
Passerculus sandwichensis savanna Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat.
Mus., Ill, 1880, 178.
5426. PasBercaluB sandwichenBis alaadinns (Bonaparte).
Passerculus alaudinus Bonaparte, Comptes Rendus,
XXXVIl, 1853,918.
Passerculus sandwichensis y. alaudinus Ridgway, Field and
Forest, III, 1877, 198.
542c. Passercaliis sandwicheiuiis bryanti Riik;way.
Passerculus sandwUhensis bryanti Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat.
Mus., VII, 1885, 517.
543. Passercaliui beldingi Ridgway.
Passerculus beldingi Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., VII,
1885, 516.
544. PasserculUB rostratns (Cassin).
Ember iza rostrata Cassin, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1852.
348.
Passerculus rostratus Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858.
446.
544a. Passerculas rostratas gnttatus (Lawrence).
Passcrcu/ns guttatus Lawrence, Ann. Lye. N. H. N. V., VIIL
1867, 473.
Passerculus rostratus var. guttatus CouES, Check-List, 1874,
bWh. Passerculas rostratus halophilns (McGregor).
Ammodramus halophilus McGregor, Auk, XV, July, 1S98.
265.
Passeratlus rostratus halophilus Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat.
Mus., No. 50, pt. 1, 1 901, 202.
^*i9^] Twelfth Supplement to the A, O, U, Check-List. 349
544c. Passercvliui roBtratna sanctomm (Ridgway).
Passerculus sanctorum Ridgway, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., V,
1883, 538.
Passerculus rostratus sanctorum Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat.
Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 201.
Subgenus COTURNICT7LU8 Bonaparte. This becomes a full
genus, to include Nos. 545, 546, 546a, and 546^. Hence
Genus COTTJRNICULTTS Bonaparte.
Subgenus CBNTRONTX Baird.
Centronyx Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858, 440.
Type, Emberiza bairdii Audubon.
545. Cotnmiculiui bairdii (Audubon).
Emberiza bairdii Audubon, Birds Amer., VII, 1843, 359, pi. •
500.
Coturniculus bairdii Bonaparte, Consp. Avium, I, 1850, 481.
Subgenus COTURNICULUS Bonaparte.
Coturniculus Bonaparte, Geog. & Comp. List, 1838, 32.
Type, Fringilla passerina Wilson.
546. CotamiculuB savannanun passerinuB (Wilson).
Fringilla passerina Wilson, Am. Om., Ill, 18 11, 76, pi. 26,
% 5-
Coturniculus savannarum passerinus Ridgway, Proc. U. S.
Nat. Mus., VIII, 1885, 568.
54Ga. CotnmicaliiB savannamm bimaculatns ( S w a i nson) .
Ammodramus bimaculatus Swainson, Philos. Mag., n. sen, I,
1827, 435-
Coturtiiculus savannarum bimaculatus Ridgway, Bull. U. S.
Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 205.
350 Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. C keek-List. [^jjj
546^. Cotamiculiui saTannamm floridaniis Mearns.
Florida Grasshopper Sparrow.
Coturnicuius sa7>annarum floridanus Mearns, Proc. U. S.
Nat. Mus., XXIV, 1902, 915.
[B-, C— ,R-,C— .]
Geog. Dist. — Central Florida (Kissimmee prairie region).
Nos. 547, 547^, and 548 are transferred from Coturnicuius to
Ammodramus. The reference to the subgenus Ammodramus on
p. 227 (Check-List, 1895) is to be removed, and the reference to
the genus on p. 223 is to be placed above No. 547.
581. Melospixa melodia (Wilson). This becomes a sub-
species of Melospiza cinerea (Gmelin), hence Nos. 58i-58ii(,
together with four additional subspecies (58i/-58i£^) and No.
5 8 1. 1, will become
^ 581. Meloepisa cinerea melodia (Wilson).
Fringilla melodia Wilson, Am. Orn., II, 18 10, 125, pi. xvi.
Melospiza cinerea melodia Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 354.
58 1 a. Melospiza cinerea f allaz ( Hai rd) .
Zonoh-ichia fallax Baird, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1854,
1 19.
Melospiza cinerea fallax Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No.
50, pt. I, 1901, 362.
581^. Melospiza cinerea montana (Henshaw).
Melospiza fascia la montana Henshaw, Auk, I, July. 1884,
224.
Melospiza cinerea montana Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 358.
581c. Melospiza cinerea heermanni (Baird).
Melospiza /leerman ni Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858,
478.
^*Iw ^] Tweljik Supplement to the A, O. L'. Check-List, 35 I
Melospiza cinerea heermanni Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 364.
h%\d, Melospixa cinerea samuelis (Baird).
Ammodramus samuelis Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX,
1858, 455.
Melospiza cinerea samuelis Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 369.
581^. Melospiza cinerea morphna (Obekholser).
Melospiza melodia tnorphna Oberholser, Auk, XVI, April,
1899, '83.
. Melospiza cinerea morphna Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 372.
581/. Melospixa cinerea mfina (Bonaparte). ,
Passerella rufina Bonaparte, Consp. Av., I, 1850, 477.
Melospiza cinerea rufina Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No.
50, pt. I, 1901, 373.
581^. Melospiza cinerea rivnlaris (Bryant).
Melospiza fasciata rrimlaris Bryant, Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci.,
2d ser., I, Sept. 2,9, 1888, 197.
Melospiza cinerea rivularis Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 363.
581A. Melospiza cinerea graminea (Townsend).
Melospiza fasciata graminea Townsend, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
XIII, 1890, 139.
Melospiza cinerea graminea Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 369.
581t. Melospiza cinerea dementce (Townsend).
Melospiza fasciata clementie Townsend, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
XIII, 1890, 139.
FAuk
352 Twelfth SuppUmemt to ike A. O, U. Check- List. jj^y
Melospiza cinerea elements Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. li 1901, 368.
581^*. Melospisa cinerea jnddi (Bishop).
Melospiza fasci at a juddi Bishop, Auk, XIII, April, 1896, 132.
Melospiza citurea juddi A. O. U. Committee.
58 lA;. Meloepiza cinerea merrilli (Brewster).
Melospiza fasciata merrilli Brewster, Auk, XIII, Jan. 1896,
46.
Melospiza cinerea merrilli Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. 1, 1901, 361.
581/. Melospiza cinerea posiUnla (Ridgway).
Alameda Song Sparrow.
Melospiza fasciata pusillula Ridgway, Auk, XVI, Jan. 1899,
35-
Melospiza cinerea pusillula Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. 1, 1901, 370.
[B— ,C— ,R— ,C— .]
Geog. Dist. — Salt marshes of San Francisco Bay, California.
5817/7. Melospisa cinerea cooperi (Ridgway).
San Diego Song Sparrow.
Melospiza fasciata cooperi Riix;way, Auk, XVI, Jan. 1899,35.
Melospiza cinerea cooperi Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus..
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 367.
[B-,C— , R-,C-.]
Geog. Dist. — San Quentin Bay, Lower California, north along
the coast to Monterey Bay, California, east to Fort Tejon, San
Bernardino, etc.
581;<. Melospiza cinerea caurina (Ridgway).
Takutat Song Sparrow.
Vol. XX j Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Check-List. 353
Melospiza fasdata caurina Ridgway, Auk, XVI, Jan. 1899,
36.
Melospiza cinerea caurina Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 375.
[B-,C-,R-,C— .]
Geog. Dist. — Coast of Alaska, from Yakutat Bay to Lituya Bay.
581o. Melospiza cinerea kenaieiuiis (Ridgway).
Kenai Song Sparrow.
Melospiza melodia kenaiensis Ridgway, Auk, XVII, Jan. 1900,
29.
Melospiza cinerea kenaiensis Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 375.
[B— ,C— , R— ,C— .]
Geog. Dist. — Coast of Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, from east side
of Cook Inlet to Prince William Sound. {Cf, Ridgway, Bull. U.
S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 376.)
i>81.1. Melospisa cinerea insignis (Baird).
Melospiza insignis Baird, Trans. Chicago Acad. Sci., I, 1869,
319, pi. xxix, fig. 2.
Melospiza cinerea insignis Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 376.
<>02. Sporophila morelleti sharpei Lawrence. This
becomes
602. Sporophila morelleti (Bonaparte).
Morellet's Seed-eater.
Spermophila morelleti Bonaparte, Consp. Avium, I, 1850,
497-
Sporophila morelleti Cabanis, Mus. Hein., I, 1851, 150.
[B 388, C 200, R 252, C 296.]
354 Twelfth SupplemeMi to the A. O. U, Chech-Liit. [^JjJ
Geog. Dist. — Lower Rio Grande, in Texas, south through
eastern Mexico and Central America, to Costa Rica (both sides).
The subspecies sharpei is not satisfactorily differentiated from
morelleti, {Cf, Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I.
190^ 575-)
[607.1.] Piranga mbricaps Gray. This is removed from the
* Check-List ' and becomes
18.1. Piranga mbriceps Gray, of the ' Hypothetical List.'
Genus IRIDOPROCNE Coues.
Iridoprocne CouES, Birds Colo. Valley, 1878, 412. Type,
Hiriimio bicolor Vieillot. (Cf, Coues, Osprey, III. 1899.
144.) Hence No. 614 becomes
014. Iridoprocne bicolor (Vieillot).
Hirundo bicolor Vieillot, Ois. Am. Sept., I, 1807, 61. pi. 31.
I\ridoprocne\ bicolor Coues, Birds Colo. Valley, 1878, 412.
015t/. Tachycineta thalassina brachyptera Brkwstkk.
Saint Lucas Swallcw.
Tachycineta thalassina brachyptera Brewster, Bull. Mu*-.
Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 167.
[B 22%, part, C 11^, part, R 1^6, part, C 161, /<//-/.]
Geo(;. Dist. — Cape region of Lower California. {Cf. Brkwstkr.
Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 167.)
627rf. Vireo gilvns swainsonii (Baird).
VTeBtern VTarbling Vireo.
Vireo swainsonii Baird, Pacific R. R. Reports, IX, 1858.336.
V[irco'] g[ilviis']suuiinsonii Co\:z^y Key N. A. Birds, 1872. 121.
[K 245, part, C i2S<7, R 139^, C 175.]
mmeHr /o lit A. O. U. Chtck-litt. 355
United Sutes, east to the Rocky
titer to central and western Mexico.
. Comp. Zool., XH, 1902, 174: RiDG-
1896, 472.)
fiCERUS RAKiNEsyus. This name Is cor-
atUtheroB, to agree with the original spelling.
fba nigrifrons Brewster. This has been
ergrade wiih D. auduboni {Cf. Riixjwav, Bull.
IS., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 555) ; hence
lea auduboni nigrifoons (Brewster).
■rifrotts Brewster, Auk, XVI, April, 1899, 94.
Waudiifioni nigrifrons Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat.
K SO, pt. II, 1901, 555.
^ypis trichas slnnoaa J. Grinnell.
^t MarBb T'ellow-tbroMt
^s truhiii siriuiisii Grinnell, Condor, III, May, 1901,
[B — , C — , R — , C — .]
- Salt mnr.shes of San Francisco Bay, California.
^IAV, Bull. U. S. Nit. Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1901, 672.)
[•othlypis poliocephala ralphi Ridgwav. This
Qcothljrpis poliocephala Bairp.
Rio Oraode 7eUow-Ulroat.
'totklypis pelioeephala Baird, Review Am. Birds, 1865, 125.
[B— , C— , R— , C— .]
. DisT, — Lower Rio Grande Valley, in Texas, south into
(Morelos, Michoacan, Sinaloa, etc.).
356 Twelfth SuppUment to the A. O, (/. Check-List. [^^
The supfK)sed subspecies ralphi proves to be indistinguishable
from G. poliouphala {cf, Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50,
pt. II, 1902, 687).
6855. 'Wilsonia pnsilla chryseola Ridgway.
Oolden Pileolated VTarbler.
iP'ilsonia pusilla chryseola Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 714.
[B 213, /ar/, C 102a, party R 12 ^a^ party C 148/ar^.]
Geog. Dist. Pacific Coast district, from southern California
to British Columbia, southward during migration to Arizona,
Lower California, and western Mexico. {Cf. Ridgway, Bull. U.
S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 714.)
Subgenus TBLMATODYTES Cabanis. This becomes
Genus TELMATODYTES Cabanis.
Telmatodytes Cabanis, Mus. Hein., I, 1850, 78. Type, Certhia
palustris Wilson. {Cf, Coues, Osprey, III, 1899, 144.)
725. Telmatodytes palustris (Wilson).
Certhia palustris Wilson, Am. Orn., II, 1810, 58, pi. 12,
fig. 4.
Telmatodytes palustris Henry, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.,
1859, 107.
725a. Telmatod3rte8 palustris paludicola (Baird).
Cistothorus palustris, var. paludicola Baird, Rev. Am. Birds,
I, 1864, 148.
Telmatodytes palustris paludicola Ridgway, Geol. Ex. 40th
Parallel, IV, 1877, 425.
725^. Telmatodytes palustris griseus (Brewster).
Cistothorus palustris griseus Brewster, Auk, X, 1893, 216.
Telmatodytes palustris griseus A. O. U. Committee.
^"^w ^ Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Chech-List. 357
725c. Talmatodytes palustris plesiuB (Oberholser).
Cistothorus palusiris plesius Oberholser, Auk, XIV,|^i897,
188.
leJmatodytes palustris plesius A. O. U. Committee.
725.1. Talmatodytes mariance (Scott).
Cistothorus mar iarue ScoiT, Auk, V, April, 1888, 188.
Telmatodytes mariafus A. O. U. Committee.
727c. Sitta carolinensis nelson! Mearns.
Rooky Mountain Nuthatch.
Sitta carolinensis nelsoni Mearns, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.
XXIV, 1902, 923.
[B 278, /jr/, C iZa.part, R ^la.part, C 58,/</r/.]
Geog. Dist. — Rocky Mountain region of the United States,
south into Mexico (Chihuahua and Sonora). (C/. Mearns, Proc.
U. S. Nat. Mus., XXIV, 1902, 923.)
l^ld, Sitta carolinensis lagunce Brewster.
Saint Luoaa Nuthatoh.
Sitta carolinensis laguna Brewster, Auk, VIII, 1891, 149.
[B — , C 38dr, part, R 5 la.part, C 58, /nr/.]
Geog. Dist. — Cape region of Lower California. ( Cf. Brew-
ster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Z06I., XLI, 1902, 203.)
The range of No. 727*^ thus becomes restricted to the Pacific
coast region of the United States.
Subgenus LOPHOPHANES Kaup. This becomes
Genus B2BOLOPHX7S Cabanis.
Baolophus Cabanis, Mus. Hein., I, 1850, 91. Type, Farus
bicolor LiNNiEUS.
Lophophanes was based on Parus cristatus Linnaeus, which is
generically distinct from the American crested Titmice. This
358 Twelfth Supplement to the A, O. U. Check- List. [j'jj
necessitates the adoption of Baohphus as the generic name of P,
hicolor and its alh'es {cf. Ridgway, Auk, XX, 1903, 308.) Hence
731. Bceolophus bicolor (LiNN^eus).
Parus bicolor Linnaeus, S. N. ed. 12, I, 1766, 340.
B\aoIophus'\ bicolor Cabanis, Mus. Hein., I, 1850, 91.
731a. BceolophuB bicolor texensis (Sennett).
Parus bicolor texensis Sennett, Auk, IV, 1887, 29.
Baolophus bicolor texensis Ridgway, Auk, XX, 1903, 308.
732. BceolophuB atricristatns (Cassin).
Parus atricristatus Cassin, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1850,
103, pi. 2.
Baolophus atricristatus Ridgway, Auk, XX, 1903, 308.
733. BceolophuB inomatns (Gambel) .
Parus inornatus Gambel, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1845.
265.
Bieohphus inornatus Ridgway, Auk, XX, 1903, 308.
783c/. Beeolophus inomatns grisens (Ridgway).
Lophophanes inornatus griseus Ridgway, Pr. IT. S. Nat. Mus.,
V, Sept. 5, 1882, 344.
BiPolophns inornatus griseus Ridgway, Auk, XX, 1903,308.
788^. Beeolophns inomatns cineracens (Rii>gway).
Lophophanes inornatus cineraceus Riik;way, Proc. U. S. Nat.
Mus., VI, 1883, 154.
Bicolpphus inornatus cineraceus l^\iyGyiK\'y Auk, XX, 1903,308.
784. Beeolophns woUwebari (Bonaparte).
Lophophanes woUweberi Bonaparte, Compt. Rend., XXXI,
1850, 478.
BiPohphus wolhvebcri Ridgway, Auk, XX, 1903, 308.
^^U^^] Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Chech-List. 359
7416. Pams mfescens barlowi J. Grinnell.
Barloii^'s Chickadee.
Parus mfescens barloivi J. Grinnell, Condor, II, 1900, 127.
[B— , C-, R— , C— .]
Geoo. Dlst. — Coast Range of California, from Monterey
county to San PVancisco Bay. {Cf Grinnell, Condor, II, 1900,
127.)
II. PROPOSED CHANGES IN NOMENCLATURE NOT
ADOPTED.
CyclorrhynchuB vs. Phaleris {cf Grant, Cat. Birds Brit.
Mus., XXVI, 1898, 607). The type of Phaleris, by
elimination, is Alca pygmaa Gmelin, hence no change is
necessary.
•^7. StarcorariuB parasiticas vs. S cepphus, and
•^8. Stercorarins longicandus vs. S, parasiticus (cf, Roths-
child & Hartert, Novit. Zool., 1902, 413). In the opinion
of the Committee the proposed changes are undesirable.
l:i!3a, 123/>. Phalacrocoraz pelagicus robustus et resplen-
dens vs. P. pelagicus^ and
124. Phalacrocoraz urile vs. P, hicristatus {cf. Grant, Cat.
Bds. Brit. Mus., XXVI, 1898, 361, 358). A change in these
cases appears to be unwarranted.
151. Clangula clangula vs. C. glaucion {cf, Godman, Biol.
Cent.-Am., Aves, III, 1902, 225). As Clangula has page
precedence over glaucion no change is necessary.
Charitonetta vs. Clangula. {Cf Godman, Biol. Cent.-
Am., Aves, III, 1902, 226). As Charitonetta seems fairly
entitled to generic recognition, no change seems advisable.
360 Twelfth Supplement to the A, O. U. Chech-List. [^^
Olor VS. Cygnus (cf, Elliot, Auk, 1899, 226). In accor-
dance with its former ruling (Auk, 1899, 129) the Commit-
tee decided that the change in this case was unnecessary.
298c. Canachitds canadensis canace vs. C. canadensis, and
2986. Canachitds canadensis osgoodi vs. C, canadensis (cj.
Grant, Ibis, 1902, 233, 234). No change is considered
necessary.
320. Colnmbigallina passerina terrestris vs. Chamttpeiia
passerina^ and
320^1. Colnmbigallina passerina pallescens vs. Chamiepeha
passerina (cf, Godman, Biol. Centr.-Am., Aves, III, 1902,
250)-
The Committee finds no reason for altering the status of these
subspecies in "the Check-List.
Bnteola {Cf. Coues, Osprey, III, 1899, 144). The characters
are too slight to warrant the adoption of Buteo/a as a full
genus.
Strix vs. Aluco^ and Strigidse vs. Aluconidce (cf. Coifs, Auk.
1900, 66). No change is deemed necessary. Dr. Coutrs
was in error when he stated that Hrisson fixed the type of
the genus Strix in 1760. (Cf. Stone, Auk, XX, 272.)
394^. Dryobates pubescens homoms vs. (). /. ieuctims (./.
\V. K. Fisher, Condor, IV, 1902, 69). It is considered
inexpedient to make a change here, as Hartlaub's description
of D. Icftiunis is too brief and inaccurate to render identi-
fication a matter of certainty.
Antrostomus vs. Caprinmlgus (cf Tenth Suppl., Auk. 1901,
317). In the absence of precise anatomical information con-
cerning the members of these genera, it is thought to be
unwise to change the status of the species in the Check-List.
4(')4.2. Empidonaz insulicola vs. E. difficilis {cf Grinnell,
Fac. Coast Avif., No. 3, 1902, 43). No argument is advanced
for this proposed change, and no action by the Committee is
deemed necessary.
^**»w ^] Twelfth SnpfUmtHt to ike A. O. U, Check-List. 36 1
484c. PerisoreuB canadensis nigricapillus vs. P, c. Jumi-
frons {cf, Howe, Osprey, 1902, 105).
485. Perisoreus obscnms vs. P, canadensis obscurus {cf,
Howe, Osprey, 1902, 105).
485a. Perisoreus obscnms grisens vs. P, canadensis (cj.
Howe, Osprey, 1902, 105).
The proposed changes in the above three cases appear to be
quite unnecessary.
Subgenus Picicorvns vs. genus Picicorvus {cf, Coues, Osprey,
III, 1899, 144). Picicorvus is not considered worthy of full
generic rank {cf Seventh Suppl., Auk, 1895, 167).
501a. Stnmella magna hoopesi vs. 5. m, mexicana {cf.
Chapman, Bull. Am. Mus. N. H., XIII, 1900, 298, 303).
This form is considered to be sufficiently distinct from S, m,
mexicana to retain its present status in the Check-List.
550{/. Ammodramns maritimns macgillivraii vs. A. mari-
timus {cf Howe, Contr. Am. Orn., I, 1902,32). The Com-
mittee is unable to find sufficient grounds for reversing its
decision in this case.
622a, h, c. Lanins Indovicianns excnbitorides, gambeli,
and anthonyi vs. Z. lud<nncianus {cf Grant, Novit. Zool.
1902, 461).
No change is considered necessary in respect to the status of
these subspecies of Lanius,
Dendroica montana vs. D, virens {cf Ritx;way, Bull. U. S.
Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 784). The identification of
Wilson's Sylvia montana with Dendroica virens appears to be
not without question, and its present position in the Hypo-
thetical List is thought to best represent its status.
713a. Heleodjrtes bmnneicapillns bryanti vs. H, brunfici-
capillus and
362 Twelfth Supplement to the A, O, U. Ckeck-List. [^
748a. Psaltripams minimns califomicns vs. /'. minimus
{cf, Grinnell, Pac. Coast Avif., Ill, 1902, 68, 72). As no
reasons are advanced for the proposed changes, no action
by the Committee appears to be necessary.
III. SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES NOT ACCEPTED.
Xenopicus grattirostris Grinnell, Condor, 1902, 89.
Characters too trivial and inconstant for recognition.
Otocoris alpestris enthymia Oberholser.
Otocoris alpestris ammophila Oberholser.
Otocoris alpestris kucansiptila Oberholser. (Cf. Ober-
holser, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XXIV, 1902, 817, 849.
864.)
The characters exhibited by these forms are considered loo
slight for recognition in nomenclature.
Cyanocitta stelleri borealis Chapman, Bull. Am. Mus. N. H..
XVI, 1902, 240.
Rejected as being almost indistinguishable from true stc/leri,
the alleged differences proving to be mainly seasonal.
Ammodramus australis (Mavnard). (Cf, Dubois, Syn.
Avium, fasc. IX, 1901, 632.)
This is equivalent to A, savannarum passerinus^ it having been
based on a winter migrant of the latter obtained in the Bahamas.
Melospiza sanaka McGregor, Condor, III, 190 1, 87.
Not distinguishable from M. cinerea.
Melospiza fasciata ingersoUi McGregor, Bull. Cooper Orn.
Club, I, 1899, 35.
Almost identical with M, c, merrilli.
Melospiza rinerea go uldi (Baird). (Cf, Grinnell, Pac. Coast
Avif., Ill, 1902, 65.)
A later name for M, c. samuelisy the t}'pe of gouldi being merely
a specimen of samuelis.
Melospiza melodia santiccrucis Grinnell, Condor, III. 1901,
92.
^*iw ^] Twelfth Supplement to the A, O, U, Check-List, 363
Not considered worthy of recognition, its relationship with M. c,
cooperi being too close for separation as a distinct subspecies.
Progne subis floridana Mearns, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
XXIV, 1902, 918.
Inseparable from P, subis, the alleged color characters being
due to age.
Hirundo eryihrogaster palmer i Grinnell, Condor, IV, 1902,
71-
Considered as not satisfactorily distinguished from H, erythro-
gaster, {Cf, also Tenth Supplement, Auk, XVIII, 313.)
Geothlypis trichas scirpicola Grinnell, Condor, III, 1901, 65.
Rejected as being equivalent to G, /. arizela,
IV. DEFERRED FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
[Cases added to this list since the appearance of the last sup-
plement are marked with an asterisk.]
Colsrmbidce vs. Podicipidce {cf, Oberholser, Auk, 1899,
286).
Phalerince vs. Simorhynchince {cf, Oberholser, Auk,
1899, 286).
52. Lams vegce vs. Z. argenlatus {cf, Kobb^, Auk, 1902, 19-
24).
94. Pnffiniia fnliginosiiB vs. P, griseus {cf, Salvin, Cat. Bds.
Br. Mus., XXV, 1896, 386).
120. Phalacrocoraz dilophns vs. P. auHtus {cf. Grant,
Cat. Bds. Br. Mus., XXVI, 1898, 373).
121. Phalacrocorax mezicaniiB vs. P, vigua mexicanm {cf
Grant, Cat. Bds. Br. Mus., XXVI, 1898, 378).
127. PelecanuB calif omicus vs. P.fuscus [= occidcntalis'] cali-
fornicus {cf Grant, Cat. Bds. Br. Mus., XXVI, 1898, 478).
Ralluslcvipes Bangs, Bull. New Engl. Zool. Club, I, 1899, 45.
364 Twelfth SuppUmeni to the A, O. U, Ckeck-List, [J^
216.1. Porsana cotnmicnlns (cf. McLain, Bull. Cooper Om.
Club, 1, 1899, 99).
[230.1.] Gallinago major (Gmelin) vs. G, media (cf, Ober-
HOLSER, Auk, XVI, 1899, 179).
* Totanus melanoleucus frazari Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp.
Zoo!., XLI, 1902, 55.)
277a. JBgialitis meloda circnincincta vs. y£. meloda {if.
Sharpe, Cat. Bds. Brit. Mus., XXIV, 1896, 294).
* Lagopus leucurus peninsularis Chapman, Bull. Am. Mus.
N. H., XVI, 1902, 236.
*310. Meleagris gallopavo merriaxni vs. Af.g. intermtdia
{cf Grant, Ibis, 1902, 235).
«
818. Leptotila folviventris brachsrptara vs. /. bnuh-
ypteraicf. Godman, Biol. Centr.-Am., Aves, III, 1902, 259).
*Acdpiter velox rufilatus {cf Grinneli., Pac. Coast Avif., III.
1902, 32).
Buteo Inyrealis umbrinus Ban(;s, Proc. New Engl. Zoi>l. Club.
II, 1901, 67.
^ Huteo borealis socorroensis (cf Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp.
Zool., XLI, 1902, 35).
* o.")X. FalCO richardsonii vs. F, coiumbarius richardsonii {cf,
Brkwstkr, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoul., XLI, 1902. 90).
* Ccn/tncis sparvcrius paiilus Howe, Contr. Am. Orn., I, 1902.
26.
Nyctala vs. Cryptoglaux {cf Rrhmond, Auk, 1901, 193).
*Mi)b. Bubo virginianna arcticiia vs. B. v, subantUus {cf
Richmond, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 1902, 86).
•(77. Sornia alula vs. S. u, doUata {cf Sharpe, Hand-List, L
1899, 296^.
^^w T Twelfth Supplement to the A. O. U. Chech-List. 365
*Speoiyto cunicularia becki Rothschild & Hartert, Novit.
ZooL, IX, 1902, 405.
*396a. Dryobates scalaris Incasanna vs. D. lucasanus {cf,
Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zocil., XLI, 1902, 102).
Picoides arctuus tenuirostris Bangs, Auk, 1900, 131.
*4076. Melanerpes formicivoms angnstifrons vs. M,
angustifrons {cf, Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Z06I., XLI,
1902, 105).
*Myiarchus crinitus residuus Howe, Contr. Amer. Orn., I,
1902, 30.
*458a. Sayomis nigricans semiatra vs. S, nigricans {cf,
Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 1 19).
Contopns vs. Horizopus (cf, Oberholser, Auk, 1899, 331).
Contopus richardsoni saiuratus Bishop, Auk, 1900, 116.
*Otocoris alpestris aphrasta Oberholser, Proc. U. S. Nat.
Mus., XXIV, 1902, 860.
*Cyanocitta s teller i carbonacca (cf W. K. Fisher, Condor,
1902, 41).
*Agelaius phivniceus richmondi (cf Ridgwav, Bull. U. S. Nat.
Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 335).
*501&. Sturnella magna neglecta vs. S, ncglecia (cf.
Ridgwav, /. r., 365) .
*503. Icterus andnbonii vs. /. melanocephalus anduboni (cf
Ridgwav, /. r., 282).
Loxia curvirostra bendirei (cf Merriam, N. Am. Fauna, No.
16, 1899, 123; Ridgwav, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50,
pt. I, 1901, 50).
*544&. Ammodramns rostratns halophilus vs. A. r. gut-
tatus (cf Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902,
139)-
366 Twelfth Supplement to the A. O, U. Check-List. [J^^
5676. Jnnco hyemalis connectans vs. /. oreganus shufeldti
{cf, RiDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 285).
567c. Junco hyemalis thnrbari vs./. oreganus thurberi {cf.
RiDGWAY, /. C. 287).
567(/. Jnnco hyemalis pinosns vs. /. oreganus pinosus {cf.
RiDGWAY, /. C. 288).
568.1. Jnnco annectens vs. hybridity between/, caniceps and
/ mearnsi {cf. Ridgway, /. c. 276).
570a. Jnnco phceonotns dorsalis vs. /. dorsalis {cf Ridg-
way, /. c. 297).
574a. Amphispiza belli nevadensis vs. A. ntifadensis {cf.
Grinnell, Auk, 1898, 59; Fisher, ibid. 190).
Melospiza cinerea cleonensis {cf. Ridgway, Bull. U. S. Nat.
Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 371).
* Melospiza cinerea phcea Fisher, Condor, 1902, 36.
*Melospiza coronatorum Grinnell & Daggett, Auk, 1903, 34.
Passerclla iliaca fuliginosa Ridgway, Auk, 1899, 36.
Passerella iliaca annectens Ridgway, Auk, 1900, 30.
Passerella iliaca insular is Ridgway, Auk, 1900, 30.
Passerella iliaca towmendi Ridgway, Auk, 1900, 30.
* Passerella iliaca annectens vs. P. i. meruloides {cf. Grinnell,
Condor, 1902, 45).
♦588c7. Pipilo macnlatns atratns vs. P. m. mega!ony.x {cf.
Grinnell, Condor, 1902, 23).
591a. Pipilo fnscns albignla vs. P. albigula {cf. Ridgway,
Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 433).
591& Pipilo fnscns crissalis vs. P. crissalis {cf, Ridgway,
/. c. 434).
591c. Pipilo fnscns senicnla vs. P. crissalis senicula {cf.
Ridgway, I.e. 436).
*
^^w T rwtf//"/* SuppUmeut to the A. O. U, Check-List. 367
5916?. Pipilo foscUB carolce vs. P, crissalis carolce (cf, Ridg-
WAY, /. c, 43s).
591 (f. Pipilo fuscuB carolce. Proposed elimination from
the Check-List {cf. Condor, 1901, 108).
Subfamily PTILIOGONATIN2B vs. Family Piiliogonatidce {cf.
RiDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 21).
Lanius ludovicianus migrans W. Palmer, Auk, 1898, 248.
♦ 649. Comp80thl3rpi8 nigrilora vs. C pitiayumi nigrilora {cf
RiDGWAY, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. II, 1902, 490).
* Compsothlypis americana ramalince Ridgway, /. c, 485.
*658. Dendroica rara vs. Z>. cceruUa (A. Allen, Auk, XX,
1903, 216).
Subfamily MIMINJB vs. Family Mimidie {cf, Ridgway, Bull.
U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 23).
* Heleodytes brunneicapillus couesi {cf Mearns, Auk, 1902,
143)-
* Heleodytes brunneicapillus an thony ilA¥.\Rj!is, Axik^ 1902, 143.
Salpinctes obsoletus pulverius Grinnell, Auk, 1898, 238.
*Salpinctes obsoletus pulverius vs. S, pulverius {cf Grinnell,
Pac. Coast Avifauna, III, 1902, 68).
*Cistothorus palustris dissaeptus Bangs, Auk, 1902, 352.
Subfamily SITTUN2B vs. Family Sittida {cf Ridgway, Bull. U.
S. Nat. Mus., No. 50, pt. I, 1901, 22).
740a. ParuB hndsonicus stoneyi vs. P, h, evura {cf Grin-
nell, Pac. Coast Avifauna, I, 1900, 60).
*Parus hndsonicus littoralis {cf Chapman, Bull. Am. Mus. N.
H., XVI, 1902, 245).
Chamcea fasciata intermedia Grinnell, Condor, II, 1900, 86.
742a. Chamcea fasciata henshawi vs. C. fasciata {cf
Osgood, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., XIII, 1899, 41).
368
Twelfth Supplement to the A.O.U. Check-Lht,
[Auk
'*743/>. Psaltripams minimus grincUe vs. P. grindie (cf.
Brewster, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, 1902, 205).
*758&. Hylocichla ustnlata cedicavs. H, ustulata {if. Grin-
NELL, Auk, 1902, 128-130).
H}'!ock/i/(j aonahisc/ik(c slevini GKistiVAX, Auk, 190 1, 258.
*Sia/ia sialis grata {cf. Howe, Contr. Am. Orn., 1902, 31 ).
Action on the following generic and subgeneric names is still
deferred.
/Egialeus Rcichenh.
Aristonetta Baird,
Astur Lacep,
* Chamitthlypis I^itigio,
Chroicocephalus Eyton,
Cymochorea Cones,
Dytes Kaup.
Encloniychura Oberh.
Kx a n t h e 111 o ps Elliot,
Fuli*;ula Stt'p/t.
Hcteropygia Cones.
Hicrofalco Cntut.
Hydrocoloeus Kaup.
Limonites Kaup.
* Myioborus Baird,
* Oporornis Baird.
Ortygops Heine.
Pallasicarbo Coucs,
*Peucedramus Coucs,
Phcebastria Reichcfib.
Proctopus Kaup.
Pseud uria Cones.
Psiloscops Cones.
Tachytriorcliis Kaup.
CONTENTS.
■i:iaM<ll<naaiBlTHiliU-.K:«L[IHiar4iiMaMrnw iLAut- t|r j^Mnrr n«M<
BttMrt-'RaCK^f Lwt. Hr n'tOUmAUMiP. , . . .
Nhtmo* Wiwtm Own L>» IK iif> Ti(i^«*>* Viujn.- Bf M'MMvr JTlaar.
(Id *wa Qwkdi Ki>H*i «• r<i« N<iiii<> AHnioa D«il> Of Ifaiwr XHa*. .
NirTBo* Tii> UniH » Tn Cahmu I>i<nii7. B»t>» Ciumw*. Bf JJkvA
RWWMIIIE* r4 IlkicMMiic Vjtn«TiiiNiiiNiia«i>ii*iV«K. tlf Itfrrta MM JU
I . Mmrtt^i in mdiiHu, ISI-. K)l«la 1
I ri<* Kliif Rtll W PI/nuiniJMPMniTT. i
> , .. I ~^^l ■' R<iuU ttUuri. 111). Riili"
t»M K ilvA Maud Hauu Spaxun, ixOi 'n>« Luuhb-x W4nn-'rr»^ih In W
K*c*>n ljiw«»»»».— UdJ«» re
1.(1 Mn. BiT'tlV. "Mr W'r^vlhni'
!f.m.'. Uul"r» '' ' - '■ ■■'■
;: tlhhttno ">- •■
1 . ^ili>Sniiili^ 1lOT>nM<it nt rimttioL, u
I ; fUulcldl iiB llw CltuUuilUu III Ccrulii U
lnr>~-ilUlaU) rinwai rdnni
, HI, H« K«l«™l lU^T J"U"i<
IMV S«*. U»-
tTUfi AUK,' |>iil.li-ft._-,l L.. Uif C.
rv.MHi, I. «illicil t>j Ur. J- A. Al.1.1
Trn«' - — *i,r« n Tcur. Including ptrtlage, itriclljr in aJmiiW. SluuJe nHiiS'
(nr- ■-'- '■-'^ <o llooonnj FrlliiMit. Biiii'iu IVllow*. Mtnilwn.au>l
A I.I. i,n\ in lUTCan for due*.
^ % i^nUactneoM iluiuld he oddieiwd iii 'TltE AL^K.'
Ill I CANlr((iiii.i:, Ma»»-. or to WILLIAM UfTCtlliR,
ii.i NUTtiiAnnK Ave,. Nicw Vokk. Sr V, Powpj snV
«tiib«i. .1.1 <.i,u,u, Tiiij Ai'K- tlirnuitK GCKNKV AND JACTiSON.
Ail aninlet and commuaicatlona tnti^nileil Iht puhLliuillon add all twttk* and
pubUcMltDnatorniirliir. •I«iitM f-p ■.ft" t" Itr.J. A. AI.LUN, Atleti
MaimtciiplJ fiir un.. ■ i. n.iu-h llii^ t-diioT nl '■
licfiio- the JbIC nr »i4 ■■ I M -If HilrnJril, H'
Itn 'Oenvnil Nolo.' .^ not laier tlwfi ■:
- - ■■ - .I'-r mvam!i|.»'!W{flt>i'
^mttiAffi
r'
THE AUK:
A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF
ORNITHOLOGY.
Vol. XX. October, 1903. No. 4.
FURTHER NOTES ON THE PHILADELPHIA VIREO,
WITH DESCRIPTION OF THE NEST AND EGGS.
BY WILLIAM BREWSTER.
Plate XL
In the ^Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club' for Janu-
ary, 1880, 1 published some * Notes on the Habits and Distribution
of the Philadelphia Vireo ( Viteo fhiiadelphicus),^ This article
was followed in 1897 by Dr. Dwight*s *A Study of the Philadel-
phia Vireo {Vireo philadelphicHS) ^^ which gives by far the fullest
and best account of the bird's habits, and especially of its song,
that has ever appeared. Of its breeding habits we still know very
little. "On the 9th of June, 1884, while camped near Duck
Mountain/' Manitoba, Mr. Seton found a nest which " was hung
from a forked twig about eight feet from the ground, in a willow
which was the reverse of dense, as it grew in the shade of a pop-
lar grove. The nest was pensile, as usual with the genus, formed
of fine grass and birch bark. The eggs were four in number,
and presented no obvious difference from those of the Red-eyed
Vireo, but unfortunately they were destroyed by an accident before
they were measured .... The bird on being shot answered per-
fectly to Coues's description, except that on the breast it was of
a much brighter yellow than I was led to expect." (Ernest E. T.
Seton, Auk, II, 1885, pp. 305, 306). The identification of this
nest must be accepted, of course, as wholly satisfactory, but that of
y
370 'Bkkwstkk, Notes OH the Pkiladelpkia Vireo. [^^
the nest taken in 1895 at Lansdowne, Ontario, Canada, by Mr.
Young and attributed by him with apparent confidence to the
'present species, leaves much to be desired. The parent birds, he
tells us, were merely "observed" through "strong field glasses."
Although " decidedly smaller than the Red-eye " they were " more
bulky in shape," while " the yellow shading of the breast was not
very evident." These statements are not calculated, on the whole,
to inspire confidence, especially as Mr. Young admits that he '* had
never met with the species before." Had he been familiar with
its appearance in life he would have known that it looks less
instead of "more bulky" than the Red-eye and that the yellow of
its under parts is invariably conspicuous when the bird is viewed
in a good light. The chances are that the Vireos he saw were
merely small individuals of V, oiivaceus. At all events the record
is not supported by good enough evidence to be worth serious
consideration. The nest to which it relates was built in a low
shrub {Spircea saltcifolid) and contained, in addition to two eggs
of the Cowbird, a single egg of the rightful owner which " was
marked exactly like that of the Red-eye Vireo but was smaller,
and according to its size was rather more globular in shape "
(C. J. Young, Auk, XV, 1898, pp. 191, 192).
As I reported in 1880 (in the article above mentioned), the
Philadelphia Vireo is a not uncommon summer resident of the
region lying about Lake Umbagog in western Maine and northern
New Hampshire where its favorite haunts are second-growth
woods about the edges of farms or other openings and burnt lands
sparsely covered with young poplars and paper birches. In
places of this character I found it very generally if somewhat
sparingly distributed during the greater part of June, 1879, but
although the behavior of several pairs which I had under almost
daily observation that season convinced me that they were breed-
ing I failed to discover any of their nests. Nor was I more for-
tunate in 1 88 1 when the numbers of the birds appeared to be
unchanged. My next spring visit to Umbagog was made in 1896
when, with the assistance of Mr. C. H. Watrous, Mr. R. A. Gil-
bert and one of the local guides, I devoted upwards of five con-
secutive weeks (May 12-June 15) to looking for rare birds and
nests in the immediate neighborhood of the lake. The corre-
^^Iqoj ^] Brewster, Notes oh the Philadelphia Vireo, 3 y i
spending period of the following year was also spent in the same
locality with the same companions. The field work accomplished
during these two seasons was by far the most thorough and suc-
cessful of any that I have ever done, before or since, in this
region, yet on both occasions I failed to meet with the Philadelphia
Vireo after the close of its vernal migration, although I searched
for it faithfully and persistently in the places where I had seen it
in former years, as well as in other similar localities. Whether it
was really absent during these two summers or, for some reason,
not in full song up to the date of my departure — in which case I
might easily have overlooked it — I am not, of course, able to say,
but I can confidently affirm that it reoccupied certain of its ances-
tral haunts near the southern end of Lake Umbagog during the
past season, and that at least one pair attempted to breed there,
for I found and took their nest and eggs.
This piece of good fortune fell to my lot quite unexpectedly
and by the merest chance — as so often happens in such cases.
I had gone to the lake on June 1 1 with no thought of doing any
field work but chiefly for the purpose of superintending the pack-
ing and shipment of a portion of my camping outfit for which I
had prospective use elsewhere. The 12th and 13th were stormy
days, admirably adapted for continued and contented application
to drudgery of this kind. On the 14th, however, the weather was
perfect, and as my task was practically finished I started for a
walk immediately after breakfast. On reaching the woods I
found them so very wet, after the heavy rains of the preceding
two days, that I was glad to follow a road that led through an
extensive tract of second growth poplars and paper birches, inter-
mingled with a few balsams and red spruces. I had gone but a
short distance into this cover, when an unfamiliar looking plant
growing by the roadside arrested my attention. As I paused to
examine it, I became conscious that a Vireo which I took, at first,
to be a Red-eye, was singing in an aspen {Populus tremuloides)
directly overhead. No doubt I had been hearing him for some
time, letting the sound " pass in one ear and out the other," as
most of us are accustomed to do when the tiresome * Preacher ' is
holding forth. Nor is it likely that the song of this particular
bird would have finally attracted my notice had it not suddenly
3^2 Brewster, Notes on the Philadelphia Vireo. \c^
occurred to me that the notes of the Philadelphia Vireo are closely
similar to those of the Red-eye and that I had found the former
species in this very same piece of woods in 1879. No sooner
had this thought entered my mind, than I began to give critical
attention to the voice that continued to come almost unceasingly
' from somewhere among the upper branches of the aspen. It was
exceedingly like that of Vireo olivaceus but pitched in a slightly
higher key, while the notes were less varied and separated by
decidedly wider intervals. One of them, moreover, was dissimilar
in form to anything that the Red-eye habitually utters. As I
noted these slight peculiarities it came back to me that they were
all characteristic of the song of the Philadelphia Vireo which, by
the way, I had last heard in 188 1, and hence did not remember
very vividly. All the while I had been momentarily expecting to
get a sight at the singer, or, at least, to ascertain his exact posi-
tion, for there was not a breath of wind and no bird, however
small, could have stirred among the easily agitated leaves of the
aspen without betraying his whereabouts. The leisurely, halting
song, however, continued to afford the only tangible evidence that
a Vireo was concealed somewhere among the dense, deep green
foliage. After encircling the tree a dozen times or more, tilting
my head upwards until the muscles of my neck ached intolerably,
I lost all patience and deciding that the bird must be sitting quite
motionless on some leafy twig — as Vireos will sometimes do for
many minutes at a time, when singing in the heat of the day — I
collected a number of stones with the intention of throwing them
at random into the denser parts of the tree, hoping thereby to
dislodge the sluggish bird. Just as I was about to carry this plan
into effect it occurred to me that the males of certain of our New
England Vireos are given to singing on the nest while taking their
turns at incubating the eggs.^ This reflection caused me to drop
the stones and begin looking for a nest instead of a bird. A few
moments later I saw, through an opening in the foliage, in the
very middle of the tree, scarce ten feet below its topmost twigs
and fully thirty feet above the ground, a globular object of a light
^ I have never known the Red-eye to do this but it is a common if not
regular practice with the Warbling and Solitary Vireos.
^^Iw^] Brewster, Notes on the Philadelphia Virco, 373
grayish brown color. Holding my glass on it with some difficulty
— for I was now actually trembling with excitement — I made it
out clearly to be a small, neatly-finished and perfectly new-looking
Vireo's nest attached to a short lateral twig of one of the long,
upright terminal shoots that formed the crown of the aspen.
Looking still more closely I could see the head of the sitting bird
and even trace the swelling of his throat and the slight opening of
his bill as he uttered his disconnected notes. Soon after this he
left the nest and flying to a neighboring tree alighted on a dead
twig where I had a clear view of him and quickly satisfied myself
that without question he was a Philadelphia Vireo. He looked no
larger than a Nashville Warbler, and his breast, when he turned
it towards the sun, appeared bright yellow, while his throat was
unmistakably — if less strongly — tinged with the same color. It
was fortunate that I was able to thus positively identify him by
sight at this particular time. Had I not done so I should have
continued my walk without troubling myself further about either
him or his nest, for the song which he now began — and con-
tinued, with occasional brief pauses, for upwards of ten minutes
— was to my ears absolutely indistinguishable from the typical song
of Vireo olivaceus. The voice appeared to be the same in pitch
as well as quality, the notes similar in both form and expression,
and the delivery equally rapid. I regret that it did not occur to
me to time the number of separate utterances per minute, but I
feel sure that there must have been as many as the most voluble
* Preacher * often succeeds in producing. Dr. Dwight says that
" V, philadelphicus sings at the rate of from twenty-two to thirty-
six notes a minute, averaging a trifle over twenty-six, while V,
olivaceus rattles on at the rate of from fifty to seventy, their song
rate averaging a trifle over fifty-nine." This, no doubt, is ordi-
narily true, but equally without question the rule just quoted is
not always adhered to by either species — as, indeed. Dr. Dwight
seems to have known, or at least suspected. His comparative
description of the songs of the two birds is so good and true at
most points that, as a whole, it is not likely to be ever improved
upon. Nevertheless by reason of its very depth and subtilty of
analysis it tends to obscure what is really the crux of the whole
matter, viz., the fact that the differences with which it deals so
2^ A. Brewster, Notes on the Philadelphia Vireo, foct
ably are too slight and inconstant to be easily recognized or safely
relied on as a means of identification. In other words, only
those who possess critical and highly trained ears can hope to
distinguish the Philadelphia Vireo from the Red-eye by its song
alone, while even the experts in such matters are likely to be
occasionally deceived.
The bird which we left perched on the dead branch remained
there, as I have just said, upwards of ten minutes, basking in the
sunshine and pouring out a perfect flood of song. At the end of
this period he flew directly back to the nest and on entering it at
once resumed the listless, interrupted singing which I have already
described. I am nearly sure that he did not again leave it that
forenoon, for whenever I revisited it — as I did every fifteen or
twenty minutes — I found him still there and still singing. He
seemed rather ill at ease, keeping his head in almost constant
motion and occasionally turning half around in the nest. Once
he stretched his neck well out and down over the rim to seize the
loose end of one of its component strands, which he tugged at so
violently with his bill as to perceptibly shake the whole structure.
Perhaps this was done merely to relieve his evident ennui, or he
may have been giving vent to irritation caused by the prolonged
absence of his mate, who was not seen at all on this occasion.
When we took the nest, early the next morning (about six
o^clock), the male was again sitting and beguiling himself as
before by frequent snatches of his leisurely song. He did not
leave the nest until my assistant, Mr. Gilbert, reached and slightly
shook the branch to which it was attached, when he flew directly
off out of sight through the woods — no doubt in search of his
mate, for he returned with her a few minutes later. Both birds
came close about Gilbert's head while he was still in the top of
the tree, making their low scolding note which so closely resem-
bles that of the Warbling Vireo, but the male seemed shy and
suspicious and soon departed again. The female was much tamer
and showed more concern, remaining in the tree until she was
finally shot — just after the nest and eggs had been safely lowered
to the ground. On skinning her I found that she would have
added no more eggs to the three perfectly fresh ones which were
found in the nest.
^*J^-J^] Brewster, Notes on the Philadelphia Vireo. 37:;
The nest was hung, after the usual Vireo fashion, in a fork
between two diverging, horizontal twigs. One of these, a lateral
branch from the upright shoot already mentioned, is rather more
than a quarter of an inch in diameter and evidently formed the
chief support, as the other twig is scarce thicker than the flower
stem of a buttercup. The nest is firmly bound to both for some
distance along its rim. It is much longer than broad, measuring
externally 3.20 inches in length, 2.75 in width, and 2.65 in
depth; internally 2.00 in length, 1.50 in width, and 1.35 in depth.
Its walls are more than half an inch thick in places, its bottom
almost a full inch. It appears to be chiefly composed of inter
woven or closely compacted shreds of grayish or light brown bark,
apparently from various species of deciduous trees and shrubs as
well as, perhaps, from dried weed stalks. The exterior is beauti-
fully decorated with strips of the thin outer bark of the paper
birch, intermingled with a few cottony seed tufts of some native
willow still bearing the dehiscent capsules. Most of these
materials are firmly held in place by a gossamer-like overwrapping
of gray-green shreds of Usrua, but here and there a tuft of willow
down or a piece of curled or twisted snow-white bark was left free
to flutter in every passing breeze. It would be difficult to imagine
anything in the way of external covering for a bird's nest more
artistically appropriate and effective. The interior, too, is admir-
ably neat and pretty, for it is lined with the dry, tan-colored
needles of the white pine (among which are a very few slender
blades of grass), arranged circularly in deep layers around the
sides and bottom of the cup in which the eggs were laid. Most
of these materials are also used habitually by the Red-eye, but
the nest of the latter is seldom, if ever, so liberally and tastefully
decorated. That of the Solitary, however, is occasionally orna-
mented in much the same way and to a nearly equal degree.
The nests of both these species, as well as those of the Warbling
and Yellow-throated Vireos, are almost invariably larger, rounder
and relatively shallower than this nest of the Philadelphia which,
mdeed, most nearly resembles that of the White-eyed Vireo in
size and proportions, although the nest of the latter is usually
much deeper and more purse-shaped.
The eggs measure respectively .80 x ,54; .81 x .53 and .79 x
•2^6 BKKWSTKKy Notes ott the Philadelphia Vireo. focu
.54 (one hundredths of an inch). They are elongate ovate in shape
and pure white, sparsely spotted with burnt umber, chocolate and
dull black. Most of the markings are small and rounded while
many of them are mere specks. On two of the eggs they are
rather generally distributed save about the smaller ends which are
immaculate, but on the third egg they are practically confined to
the larger end. All three eggs resemble most closely those of the
Red-eyed Vireo but they are decidedly smaller than average eggs
of that bird, while in respect to shape they are unlike any Vireo's
eggs in my collection, a peculiarity which is not likely to prove
constant, however. Many of my Red-eye's eggs have similarly
clear white shells, but all the eggs of the Warbling Vireo, in my col-
lection, are more or less strongly tinged with cream color, and with
most of them the dark markings are blacker and somewhat coarser
than in these eggs of V. philadelphkus.
As I have already said, the Philadelphia Vireo's nest found in
Manitoba by Mr. Seton was only about eight feet above the ground,
in a small willow, while that which I took at Lake Umbagog was
at a height of fully thirty feet in a well-grown aspen. Which of
these two situations comes the nearer to being the usual or typical
one cannot be settled, of course, on the basis of evidence so scanty
and conflicting as that above mentioned. No doubt the nest will
be found to vary considerably in position — as well as details of
construction — in different regions or even with different birds in
the same region ; but I am now inclined to believe (although with
Dr. Dwight I have hitherto had a directly opposite impression)
that in northern New England, at least, it will prove to be ordL
narily built, like that of the Warbling Vireo, in the tops or among
the upper branches of good-sized trees. If this be so it is no
longer difficult to understand why those of us who have spent sea-
son after season in places where the Philadelphia Vireo breeds
rather numerously have looked in vain for its nest in thickets or
among the lower branches of the trees.
^^I^ojf^] Rhoaus, A utfudoftiantt. 377
AUDUBONIANA.
BY S. N. RHOADS.
The three Audubon letters herewith presented recently came
into my possession and were found to contain so much of an
apparently unpublished character of interest to ornithologists that
it was thought best to have them printed.
All were written to Edward Harris of Moorestown, one of the
most faithful and helpful friends of Audubon during his life, and
the one man, not related to the Audubon family, who most sub-
stantially aided the widow of J. J. Audubon in the financial diffi-
culties which she underwent just prior to Edward Harris's death
in 1863.
The light thrown upon Audubon's relations with, and attitude
toward, contemporary American and English ornithologists, espe-
cially Townsend, Nuttall, and Bonaparte, is of no small value and
significance. So little indeed do we know about Townsend, out-
side his charming and classic * Narrative/ that these historic ref-
erences to him by such a man as Audubon are a precious legacy
and but confirm the impression that with Townsend there prema-
turely perished one of the humblest, gentlest, and therefore truly
greatest, of Nature's noblemen.
Perhaps at no period in Audubon's life was the pressure greater,
from the literary and scientific side, than when these letters were
written to Harris. The insatiable claims oi priority had taken fast
hold upon a spirit naturally averse to technique and artificiality,
and in his journal of even date we see how he occasionally revolted
against this form of slavery and sighed for the woods and fields.
Within the mere closet naturalist these heart to heart talks of
the Great Bird Lover with his scholarly friend may stir no emotions
deeper than curiosity, but there are others who can keenly sympa-
thize with Audubon's struggles in a foreign land to forestall his
friendly rivals on both sides of the Atlantic, and can forgive the
importunity, suspicion, vanity and supersensitiveness which tor-
mented his artistic, freedom-loving soul in the greatest crisis of his
life.
378 Rhoads, Auduboniana. LOc?
Letter No. i.^
Duplicate London, Oct. 26th., 1837.
I have this moment received your dear letter of the 4. instant,
for the contents of which, I do indeed most truly thank you, but
the most important point contained in it. Dr. Spencer is now at
Paris quite well and quite happy. I have not heard of his sup-
posed intentions to visit Russia, at least not until you have shewn
yourself in Europe for awhile. When will you come ? I have not
received one single letter from Dr. Morton since my return to Eng-
land, and have been the more surprised at this, because I look upon
him as a worthy good man and as on one whom, smce my last visit
to him, I cannot but consider as my friend.
The return of Dr. Townsend to our happy land has filled me
with joy, and trebly so when you tell me that he is as friendly dis-
posed to me as I ever have been towards him. I congratulate
you, my dear friend, in the step which you have so kindly taken in
my favour, by first selecting all such Birdskins as you or Townsend
have considered as new, and also in having given freedom to Dr.
Morton to pay Dr. Townsend Fifty Dollars for the skins selected
by you, under X\iQ prudent considerations or restrictions talked of in
your letter. May I receive all the Bird skins very soon, for depend
upon it, now or never is for me the period to push on my publication.
If I have any regret to express it is, that Townsend or Dr. Morton or
yourself did not at once forward to me the whole of the Bird skins
brought latterly by Townsend, for I can assure you that it has
become a matter of the greatest niceity to distinguish the slight
though positive species lines of demarkation between our 3pecies of
Birds — and if on this reaching you, the least doubt exists amongst
yourselves respecting any one, why send it to me at once by the
very earliest conveyance. If by New York, with letter to M.
Berthoud to lose not a day, provided a packet, either to Liverpool
' Outside address :
To Edd Harris Esq^
Moorestown New Jersey
9 miles from Philadelphia Pennsylvania
U. S. A.
^*iW^] Rhoads, Auduboniana. 379
or London, is ready to sail I Had Townsend sent me the whole
of his disposible birds, I might now have perhaps been able to
have mad[e] him a remittance in cash, which the single arrival of
the German Naturalists, who are now in California may hereafter
put an end to. Mention this to him, nay, shew him this letter if
you please and assure him that I am willing to exert myself in his
behalf. Indeed, I wish you to urge him in forwarding me either
his own manuscripts or a copy of all .such parts as appertain to
Birds, as soon as possible, knowing (I think) that he will not
undertake to publish them himself under his present (I am sorry
to say) embarrassed pecuniary circumstances. Tell him that I
want all about the habits of any Birds which he has written upon,
especially, however, those found from the beginning of his journeys
until his return, and appertaining to species belonging to our fauna
or otherwise. Their exact measurements, dates, localities, migra-
tories or vice versa inclinations, descriptions of nests, eggs &c.
periods of breeding ; in a word all that he can, or will be pleased
to send me — and you may assure Townsend, that all he will con-
fide to me will be published as coming from hini^ although I may
think fit to alter the phraseology in some instances. Tell him to
be extremely careful in the naming his new species, and that [if]
he thinks of difficulties in this matter, to leave it to me, as here I
am able to see all the late published works (and they are not a
few) and work out the species with more advantage than any one
can at present in Philadelphia. Do not take this as egotism far
from it, it is in friendship and for his sake that I venture on under-
taking such an arduous task. I am exceedingly [anxious] to receive
a letter from ^im (for Nutall, though an excellent friend of mine
and a most worthly man, will not answer me in time on this sub-
ject) of all the birds contained in the plates now at the Academy of
Natural Sciences in Philada., which he saw on the Rocky Mountains^
over those mountains, on the Columbia Rii^er and off the coast of
our Western boundaries. This I want much, and if he would sim-
ply dictate to you plate i. not there, plate 2. there, plate 3 there &c.
&c. this would amply answer my purpose, and this I wish you not
to neglect to forward me as soon as possible by duplicate 1 Of course
I cannot speak upon any one of the new species of which you
speak until I have examined them all. To talk of new species in
iSo Rhoads, AuduboMt'ana, Loct^
London is a matter not now understood in any part of America,
and sorry will you be as well as himself, when I assure you that
out of the twelve supposed to be, and published by Dr. Morton,
from Townsend's first cargo, not more than six are actually unde-
scribed, although I have taken upon myself the risk of publishing
his names to the Birds on my plate, but which of course I am
obliged to correct in my letter press. The little beautiful owly I
would venture to say has been described by Vigors at least ten
years ago, &c. &c. Swainson never goes to bed without describ-
ing some new species, and Charles Bonaparte, during his late
visit to London, has published as many as 20 of a night at the
Museum of the Zoological Society Insects &c. &c. Stir, work
hard, [be] prompt in everything. My work must soon be fin-
ished, and unless all is received here by the month of May next,
why I shall have to abandon to others what I might myself have
accomplished. God bless you, many* happy years. We are all
well, thank God, just now. Remember me and us kindly to all
around and every friend and believe me ever your most truly
and sincerely attached friend,
John J. Audubon.
To Edward Harris, Esq".
Addressed, care " Messrs. Rathbone, Brothers & Co.
When you send to Liverpool. Liverpool."
^If Townsend has brought Birds Eggs, ask him to send them
me. I will return all to him that he may want. I greatly regret
that you did not find me the luater Birds of which you speak, as
I might have perchance found something new or clirious among
them. The Golden Eye Duck especially, if any he had ?
J. J. Audubon.
^ This paragraph, with the signature, is the only part of this letter in Audubon's
own hand. The preceding portion was a copy of his draft, and marked " Dupli-
cate." Undoubtedly Audubon had to make so many alterations in the original
that he was ashamed to forward it. The address on the wrapper is Audubon's
penmanship.
^foM^] Kiio ADS, Auduboniana. 38 1
Letter No. 2 J
Edinburgh, 14th. Sep^, 1838.
My Dear Friend :
Not having received anything from you in answer to my last,
I suppose that you may yet be away from Glasgow, but as we
ourselves are going off tomorrow morning to the "Highlands,"
with a view to be at Glasgow on Thursday next, I wTite to you
now, with the hope of meeting with you then ! Nothing of impor-
tance has occurred here since my last, but the book has consider-
ably swollen in its progress towards completion.
We all unite in best wishes to you and I remain as ever your
most truly attached and sincere friend,
John J. Audubon.
We intend being at home again on Saturday next.
Letter No. ^. ^
Edinburgh December 19th., 1838.
My Dear Friend:
Your letter of the 13th. instant to Victor reached us this morn-
ing, and glad were we all to hear from you.
My object in writing to you is, for the purpose of assuring you
that I feel great in preparing a box of bird skins for you according
to your desire. It is true, however, that as I am now on the eve
of commencing my synoptical arrangement of our birds, I shall
not be able to show you as many of my specimens I could other-
wise have done, but you must take the will for the deed. The
' Outside address :
To Edward Harris Esq*".
Comrie's Royal Hotel,
Glasgow.
* Outside address :
To Edward Harris Esq*".
Care of Messrs. Hottinguer & Co.
Paris.
■jSz Rhoads, Audubontana. Locf
Box will be taken as far as London by Victor, who will leave us on
the first of January'. You will find in it a list of the contents, and
I trust such bird skins as may answer your purpose well. Besides
these Victor will also attend to your request as soon as in New
York and will ship to you by way of Havre as you direct.
I am glad that you should have seen what you conceive to be
the great rara avis F. Washingtonii. I am sorry you could not
have pocketed it, but who knows if it is not left yet in store for
you and I to shoot a pair of these noble birds at The West, and
that, after having satisfactorily examined its habits, its eggs, or its
young ! Bonaparte^ between you and I, is exceedingly ignorant
as regards our birds, as I found to my cost when "he was in
London, and where he pumped me sadly too much, but it is now
over and I forgive him as I do all others who have or who may
try to injure me.
John Bach man wrote to me that he had left in commission to
Trudeau, the purchase for me of a copy of Vieillot*s Osieaux de
TAmdrique Septentrionale and also a copy of Boi^ or Boj^ work on
birds generally, but I have received neither books or promises of
them from Trudeau. Pray ask him something upon this subject,
and if he has not purchased them as yet, perhaps you would under-
take the task yourself, and show to Havell as soon as possible, for
I shall be sadly in want of them in a few weeks more. I should
also like you to try to find Mr. Augustus Thomdike of Boston, to
whom Victor wrote a few days ago, with the view to enquire from
^ that Gentleman when he wished his copy of the Birds of America
to be delivered. Victor addressed the letter to " his Hotel " or to
the care of the "American Embassy." We are not sure, however,
whether he is in Paris at present, and let me know what discover-
ies you have made as regards this. — Victor will remain ten days
in London and wishes you, should you write to him there, to put
your letter under cover to Havell and request him to keep it.
Victor will write to you from thence.
I cannot account why Trudeau has not written to me in answer
to my last, now full two months old ? Should yow perchance dis-
cover a specimen of the Bird of Washington in Paris and purchase
the same, I should like you to send it me on loan to enable me to
compare it with mine, and the Immature of the F. Albicilla of
Europe !
^*?903^^1 Rhoads, Auduhoniana. '283
I have got twelve sheets of the 5th. Vol. of Biographies already
printed, and I expect to have quite finished by the ist. of April
next. I have decided on the Trichas resembling Syhia Phila-
delphia of Wilson. It is a distinct species, but what will probably
surprise you more, the 5. Agilis of the same author is also perfectly
distinct from either. All this you will plainly see when you read
their separate descriptions and compare the three species.
I wish you would ask Trudeau whether he recollects the speci-
men of an Eagle sent by Town send in his first collection, num-
bering 54 and which the latter has lost, though he considered it as
a new species. It was procured in California. Townsend speaks
sorrowfully of the loss of this specimen. It never came under my
eye, did it come under yours ? Ask Trudeau whether he ever saw
my Hirundo Serripennis in America, Bachman wrote to me that
Trudeau thought he had at New York in the skins of Frederick
Ward. I think Trudeau will be pleased with the anatomy of our
birds, as it opens misteries hitherto unknown in connection with
the relative affinities of some species toward others and assists in
the formation of groups &c., in what some day or other, will be
called a Natural arrangement !
I wish I could have spent a few weeks in Paris with you and
Trudeau, as I readily imagine that some new species of North
American birds may yet be found there unknown to the World of
Science. I have written to Mr. Chevalier and to Townsend, but
will not, I dare say, hear anything more of the former until through
Victor, who intends to see him very shortly after his arrival in
America.
My Dear Wife is much better than when you saw her, and I
hope that when once again she has been safely landed on our
shores and enjoyed the warmth of our own Summers, her health
will be quite restored.
The Little Lucy has grown as fat as butter, and the rest of us
are well.
We all unite in kindest best wishes to you and to Trudeau, and
I remain as ever, my Dear Friend,
Yours,
John J. Audubon.
6 Alva Street.
3S4 FisHHR, Birds ofLaysan Island. [^
NOTES ON THE BIRDS PECULIAR TO LAYSAN
ISLAND, HAWAIIAN GROUP."
BV WALTER K. FISHER.
Plates XII-XVI.
We ix> not naturally associate land birds with tiny coral atolls
in tropical seas. It is therefore a strange fact that such a diminu-
tive island as Laysan, and one so remote from continental shores,
should harbor no less than five peculiar species; the Laysan
Finch {Te/espha canlans) and Honey-eater (ffimaliom free/hi),
both 'drepanidid ' birds, the Miller Bird {AcroapAaius /amUiaris) ,
the Laysan Rail (Porsanu/a palmeri) , and lastly the Laysan Teal
{Anas laysanensis). I use the term ' land birds ' loosely, in con-
tradistinction to sea-fowl, multitudes of which breed here through-
out the year. The presence of these species is all the more
remarkable because none appear on neighboring islands, more or
less distant, some of which are very similar to Laysan in structure
and flora.
Reaching out toward Japan from the main Hawaiian group is a
long chain of volcanic rocks, atoils, sand-bars, and sunken reefs,
all insignificant i.i size and widely separated. The last islet is
fully two thousand miles from Honolulu and about half-way to
Yokohama. Beginning at the east, the more important members
of this chain are : Bird Island and Necker (tall volcanic rocks),
French Frigate Shoals, Gardner Rock, Laysan, Lisiansky, Mid-
way, Cure, and Morell. Laysan is eight hundred miles northwest-
by-west from Honolulu, and is perhaps best known as being the
home of countless albatrosses.
We sighted the island early one morning in May, lying low on
the horizon, with a great cloud of sea-birds hovering over it. On
all sides the air was lively with terns, albatrosses, and boobies,
' Thea« notes were made during a visit of the FUb Commiuion steamer
' Albatross' to Laysan, May 17 to 23, 1902, and are abridged from a tnoT«
extended re|>ori on the avifauna of the island, to appear in the Bulletin of the
L'. S. Fish Cor
^°9c?T ^'®"^"» ^«></5 ofLaysan Island. 385
and we began to gain some notion of what a pandemonium the
distant swarm was raising. We landed on the west side, where
there is a narrow passage through the breakers, which curl with
beautiful hues on the coral reef, and then sweep shoreward with
flying foam.
Mr. Max Schlemmer, the superintendent, his two -assistants,
and a couple of dozen Japanese laborers constitute the human
population. The phosphate rock is very valuable for manufac-
turing fertilizer, and is worked assiduously during the summer
months. To Mr. Schlemmer the expedition owed much, for his
unfailing courtesy and substantial aid very materially promoted
the success of our week's visit. '
Laysan is a slightly elevated atoll, rudely quadrilateral in
contour, and suggests a shallow basin or platter. It is three
miles long by one and one half broad. In the center is a wholly
enclosed lagoon, covering perhaps one hundred acres. This is
surrounded by a broad, level plain, that part nearest the very
saline waters of the lagoon being destitute of any vegetable life.
From this plain the land rises as a gentle sandy slope to a low
divide or rim (about twenty-five feet above the water) near the
sea beach. Not a tree breaks the monotonous expanse, but
instead are low bushes {Chenopodium sandwicheum^ Santalum
freycifutianum^ Sccsvola kanigi) and broad areas of high, tussocky
grass. On the narrow seaward slope the turf is short and wiry,
and a broad band between the bare shores of the lagoon and the
beginning of the bush-grass is covered mostly with matted beds of
succulent Portulaca lutea^ and reddish-flowered Sesuvium portu-
Uxcastrum, Beautiful morning-glories, yellow Tribulus (reminding
one of PoUntilla)^ showy Capparis^ and numerous other flowers
add a bit of color to the landscape.
Laysan is a bird paradise. Albatrosses {Diomedea immutabilis
and D. nigripes) "by the thousands rear their young here each
year, free from fear of molestation or injury. More numerous
even are the Sooty Terns {^Sterna fuliginosd), while the Gray-
back Tern (5. lunata)^ White Tern {Gygis alba kittlitzi)^ Noio
{Micranous hawaiiensis), and Noddy {Anous stolidus) are all
abundant. Attractive and interesting birds are the boobies, of
which two species, Suia cyanops and Sula piscator are on the
286 Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. foc?
island in large numbers. The droll Frigate Bird {Fregata aquila)
is here in all the glory of his bright red gular * balloon,' and the
splendid Red -tailed Tropic Bird {Phaethon rubricaudus) in satiny
plumage of the palest rose pink, is a familiar member of the com-
munity; as he nervously flits by in the tropical sunshine his
feathers glisten with the lustre of burnished metal. Among the
Procellariidae, the Bonin Petrels {jEstrelata hypoleucd) may be
mentioned as exceeding even the Laysan Albatross in numbers, but
as they live in deep burrows one would hardly think it. Next
come the Wedge-tailed and Christmas Island Shearwaters {Fuffinus
curuatus and P, nativitatis)^ which are abundant, and the rare
Sooty Petrel {Oceanodroma fuliginosd) nests in some numbers
during the winter months.
We were at once impressed by two striking facts: the great
numbers of birds and their surprising tameness. Especially true
is this of the sea-fowl. They seemed little put out by our pres-
ence and pursued their ordinary duties as if we were an essential
part of the landscape. Even the land birds were fearless.
While we sat working, not infrequently the little warbler, or
Miller Bird, would perch on our table or chair backs, and the
Laysan Rail and Finch would scurry about our feet in unobtru-
sive search for flies and bits of meat. Each day at meal-time the
crimson Honey-eater flew into the room and hunted for millers.
As we strolled over the island the Rails scampered hither and
thither like tiny barnyard fowls, but soon returned, craning their
necks to discover why they had so foolishly retreated. As for the
sea-birds there was scarcely a species that seriously objected to
our close approach, or at any rate departed when we attempted to
photograph them. In fact the albatrosses were astonishingly
fearless, and would sometimes walk up and examine some portion
of our belongings, as if they had known us always.
It is far from my intention to speak of the sea-birds in detail
but merely to sketch hastily, though perhaps inadequately, the con-
ditions and creatures amid which the five peculiar land birds have
presumably been evolved.
The Auk, Vol. XX,
^"iQo^f^l Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island, 3^7
Laysan Finch. Telespiza cantans Wilson,
The Laysan * Finch ' is a stocky, independent creature about
the size of a Black-headed Grosbeak, and its appearance strongly
suggests one of the big-billed finches. The fully adult bird is a
light rich yellow, greenish on the back, and a deep brownish on
the wings and tail, the coverts and secondaries edged with yel-
lowish, and this plumage is not assumed until the individual is
over a year old, or perhaps not before the second season. The
female is like the male but a trifle duller in tone. Both illustra-
tions of Plate XII show the species in the subadult, brownish,
streaked feathering, which it will be seen is worn through the
first nesting season.
Telespiza and the next species considered, Himatione freethi^
are placed in the Drepanididae, a family peculiar to the Hawaiian
Islands. The differences between these two birds seem great,
and in fact about the only common character uniting the many
diverse species into the composite family is the peculiar disa-
greeable musky scent said to emanate from birds in the flesh. I
detected no such odor on either of the Laysan species, but it may
have escaped me. The origin of the Drepanididai remains still a
•sealed book, but their affinities seem to be American.
We much enjoyed the company of the Laysan Finch. He is a
sociable, saucy and fearless fellow, and captivates one by his
nonchalant, independent air. We could not walk anywhere with-
out encountering them singly and in little companies — the latter
being mostly males — diligently searching for food among the
bushes or frolicking, toward the center of the island, in open
stretches covered with portulaca and a pinkish flowered sesuvium.
When disturbed they eye the intruder in an inquisitive, half-
doubting manner, and utter their mellow, linnet-Iike call. If
pursued they do not fly far, but escape by running along the
ground, or suddenly crouching under a grass tussock. Not
infrequently they hopped about the piazza where we were pre-
paring specimens, and sought for food beneath the chairs. One
day when I was alone and quite still, a handsome male alighted
on a table at my elbow and proceeded to explore a large heap of
loose papers. He was soon lost in the rustling pile, which he
demolished with great energy in his search for novelties.
3 88 FisiiKR, Birds of Laysatt Mamd. [^
TeUspiza is not particular as to its food, but is fond of the soft
parts of grass stems, tender shoots of bushes, seeds, and espe-
cially of sea-fowl eggs. I once frightened a tern oflF her • nest/
and almost immediately a pair of Finches flew to the e^. One
of them cracked a neat hole in the shell with a few strokes
of its powerful beak, and began to feed, although I was hastily
adjusting a camera only a yard or two away. Nor did the
removal of some rocks which obscured the view bother them
greatly, for they merely hopped a few feet away and watched me
calmly, resuming their repast as soon as I had finished. (Plate
XIII, Fig. I.) But suddenly a Rail rushed out of the grass, and
with feathers erect made for the Finches in such a determined
manner that the pair flew away and left Porzanula sole possessor.
The latter lost no time in finishing the ^%%, (Plate XIII, Fig. 2.)
Undoubtedly the finches eat a goodly number of eggs in the
course of the season, for this was not the only case obser\'ed.
Their favorite nesting site is in the middle of a big tussock of
grass, somewhat nearer the ground than Himatione and Acnh
cephalus usually build. Chenopodium bushes are also frequently
used for we found nests here, as well as in grass clumps bordering
the open near the lagoon — a location very popular with all the
land birds. In each instance, in the latter case, the nest was
wedged in the center of a tussock, well hidden by tall grass stems.
It is constructed of handy materials, such as rootlets, twigs, and
coarse grass, and the whole is rather loosely put together. The
shallow cup, 2\ inches in diameter, is lined with shredded grass.
The position and character of the nest is shown in Plate XII.
There are three eggs in a complete set, although we found some
nests with only two. A fairly typical sf>ecimen is bluntly ovate, of
lustreless white, with small blotches and spots of light sepia and
lilac gray, crowded toward the larger end. and very sparingly
present on the acute half. Sometimes the spotting is distributed
evenly over the whole surface. There is much variation in size
and color. A typical example measures 24 by 18 millimeters.
The finches wore so unsuspicious that I had little difficulty in
securing photographs of ihem at the nest. The reader must
reinemher that none of tiie various precautions usual in bird
photography were here taken. The camera was within a few feel
iiE AUK.V01..X.V
^°w ^] Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. 389
of the nest, in plain sight, and the operator was seated beside it
waiting his chance. The bird in the pictures spent much of its
time scratching sand, just behind the grass tussock, and would
occasionally hop onto the edge of the nest to see what was
happening.
Laysan Honey-eater. Himatione freethi Rothschild.
The Laysan Honey-eater is a brilliant little bird, about the size
of a warbler, and very attractive when seen flitting here and there
in the soft green of chenopodium bushes. Its plumage is of a
lustrous scarlet vermilion, brightest on the crown, with wings, tail,
and abdomen a dull sepia.
They are most abundant in the interior of the island near the
open plain bordering the lagoon. Here on the extensive beds of
succulent portulaca they may be seen throughout the day, busily
walking about like pipits, either gathering insects or drinking
honey from the numerous half-blown buds. The brush-like
tongue of these creatures renders the gathering of honey, and such
tiny insects as may infest the interior of corollas, an easy task.
In fact it was no uncommon occurrence to see one go from flower
to flower, and insert its bill between the petals of a nearly opened
bud, with a certain precision and rapidity which suggested a hum-
mingbird, except of course that the Himatione was on its feet.
I also observed them catching green caterpillars from Chetwpo-
dium sandwicheum bushes, the leaves of which resemble those of
its well-known congener — our garden pig-weed. The Honey-
eaters are partial to small brownish-gray moths or * millers ' which
abound on the island. While we were at lunch, nearly every day
a Himatione flew in and extracted these creatures from cracks
between boards. It then grasped the miller with one foot, after
the manner of a bird of prey, clinging with the other to the rough
board wall, and ate the soft parts of its quarry. After a few
moments the still fluttering victim was released, and the destruc-
tive search resumed. It became evident that the millers, relieved
of important parts of their anatomy, did not thrive after such
treatment. We heartily wished the little bird good luck, for the
390 Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. Focf
millers left unpleasant memories, and likewise the imprint of their
fuzz on many of my negatives.
The nest, like that of Telespiza^ is built in grass tussocks, about
two feet from the ground. The structure is loosely made, of fine
grass and rootlets, and the dainty bowl is lined with rootlets and
brown down from young Albatrosses {Diomedea immutabilis).
There are no large white feathers in the lining, at once making
the nest distinguishable from that of Acrocephalus famtiiaris,
which builds in neighboring tussocks. The complete set seems
to be four. The ovate egg is pure lustreless white, blotched and
spotted at the large end with grayish vinaceous, and with fewer
light and dark spots of Prout's brown. A typical specimen meas-
ures 18 by 13.75 millimeters.
Himatiom freethi is closely related to the Apapane {H. san-
guined) of the larger Hawaiian Islands. The derivation of the
two Laysan Drepanididae is therefore rather plain, for although
Telespiza is a monotypic genus, it Belongs with the large-billed
genera Chloridops^ Rlwdacanihis^ and Loxioides of Hawaii, Pseudo-
nestor of Maui, and Psittacirostra of Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Lanai,
and Hawaii.
Miller Bird. Acrocephalus familiaris {Rothschild).
The sociable little Miller Bird is one of the Reed Warblers
belonging to the Sylviidae, a characteristic Old World group,
although a certain American genus, PoUoptila^ is also included in
the family. It is curious that nowhere else in the whole Hawa-
iian group does any species of Acrocephalus occur. The genus is
a wide .ranging one, extending over the whole of the central and
southern Palaearctic Region, having also representatives in Aus-
tralia and South Africa, while one division of the group is
exclusively Polynesian. Many of the species are highly migra-
tory, and winter in the tropical regions of Asia and Africa, and in
the islands of the Malay Archipelago. But the subgenus Tartare^
or genus as some consider it, to which the Laysan bird belongs, is
a distinctly Polynesian group. It is distributed over the islands
between 30® north latitude and 30° south, and between longitude
^°\'w^] Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. 3^1
120° or 125** east and 120® or 125° west. Oustalet^ considers
that this restricted group, Tar tare ^ which has only eight oceanic
species shows perhaps closer affinities with Berniera of Mada-.
gascar, than with the European and Asiatic Acrocephalus (/. r.,
p. 210). Tartare luscinia is found on Guam and Saipan, T.
syrinx in the Carolines and on Pagan of the Mariana Islands,
T, rehsei on Pleasant Island, T, aquinoctialis on Christmas Island,
7! pistor on the Fannings, 71 mendamz on the Marquesas, T, longi-
rostris through the Society and Paumota Archipelagos, and finally
71 familiaris on Laysan. I am not aware with what species fatn-
iliaris shows closest kin, but 4 priori one would rather favor the
idea that the first colonists to Laysan came from the Carolines or
the Ladrones (Mariana Islands) rather than from the south, for
the reason that the genus is not present in the main Hawaiian
group.
The Miller Bird is one of the most abundant of the species
under consideration and is seen to best advantage during the cool
of the morning or in late afternoon, for then it is very active, and-
at times musical. During the heated portion of the day, after the
custom of our wood warblers, it retires to remain * in seclusion
among shady bushes, or tall tussocks of grass where its nest is
made. Like most of the birds on the island Acrocephalus is rather
unsuspicious, though not by any means so tame as either the
Finches or Rails. I have read that its congeners in other parts
of the world are quite shy, but many rules usual in bird manners
seem here- to be thrown aside. That the little creatures are far
from nervous is demonstrated by the accompanying illustration
(Plate XIV, Fig. i ). The camera was planted about thirty inches
from the nest, and when everything was arranged I crouched
under the instrument, and waited quietly for five minutes till the
bird returned.
Whenever in evidence Acrocephalus always appears busy. It
feeds largely on moths and other insects, and receives its local
name from a fondness for millers, which, as already intimated,
abound on the island. The little warbler drags these insects from
their secluded hiding places with much skill. Its dull brownish-
1 M. £. Oustalet, Les Mammif^res et les Oiseaux des Isles Mariannes
Nouvelles Archives du Museum, 3rd series, VII, 1895, 212.
292 FiSHBR, Birds of Laysan Isiamd. VoSu
olive plumage renders it inconspicuous, and one scarcely takes
notice when it flies about the verandas, or into the dark comers of
a room, searching for its favorite food. We often saw this species
with Himationes gleaning insects in the broad purslane beds near
the lagoon.
The nest is built usually in the midst of a big tussock of grass,
and the birds seem to congregate along with the Finches and
Honey-eaters near the open plain, several times mentioned in fore-
going pages. We were puzzled to find many nests entirely com-
pleted, but without eggs, and finally concluded that the birds had
not yet begun to lay in any numbers. Only two sets, one of three
and the other (incomplete) of two, were taken. The nest is com-
posed of dried grass stems and blades, fine rootlets, and is lined
with rootlets, shredded grass and white albatross feathers, some
of the last being woven into the coarser structure of the nest.
These feathers are strictly characteristic of all the nests we found,
so that the Miller Birds probably began very long ago to make
use of this convenient material. None of the other birds use the
large white feathers, although as already stated the Himatione
employs soft albatross down. The eggs vary in ground color
from the palest olive buff through greenish white to almost pure
white. The markings consist of olive blotches and spots of vari-
ous intensities, crowded at the blunt end, and likewise very tiny
lines and specks, scattered over the whole egg. Sometimes there
are drab shell marks. One tgg was as small as 19 by 14 milli-
meters and another as large as 22 by 15.
Laysan Rail. Porzanula palmeri Frohawk,
The Laysan Rail is a wide-awake, inquisitive little creature with
a seemingly insatiable desire for first-hand knowledge. It is one
of the most naive, unsophisticated, and wholly unsuspicious birds
in the whole avian jcatalogue. Usually it is confiding and familiar
in its relations with man, yet sometimes holds aloof with a show of
reserve. It will occasionally hide behind a bunch of grass, as if
afraid, and then suddenly saunter forth with entire change of
demeanor, and examine the intruder with critical care. One can
^^9oa^^] Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island, 393
never tell just how he will be received by the next Rail. Often
they scurry away as if pursued by a Mte noir, but an insect will
stop them in their mad career, and, having promptly disposed of
this interruption, they seem to forget their former fright and
walk about stretching their necks in a highly inquisitive manner.
It is evident that they are incapable of pursuing any train of
thought for more than an instant. Their ideas seem to flash by
in kaleidoscopic succession, and within a minute they make as
many false starts as a monkey. One can scarcely imagine more
foolish and amusing little birds than these.
Porzanula palmeri is a very distinct form, and whence the
original colonists came is rather difficult to conjecture. Just why
these first birds never left the island, as the Golden Plovers do
now, is also hard to say ; unless, driven by strong winds they were
so completely worn out and lost that they never dared to abandon
the welcome land. The fact remains that they did not leave, and
we now find a bird resembling Porzana in most respects, but with
wings wofully useless and short. The Porzatia type of coloring
is present in a much lighter and bleached form.
The Rails are everywhere on the island in great numbers.
There is scarcely a bunch of grass but harbors a pair. They
probably have no serious enemies, so that the only check to their
increase is space and food supply. It is possible Man-o'-war Birds
may pick one up now and then, especially the chicks, but I saw
nothing to substantiate this. Yet the Rails like to slink about in
the shade of grass tussocks or bushes, much in the same way that
a chipmunk seeks the shadow of a log in preference to crossing
a bright sunny space. This trait suggested the idea that they
might have winged enemies. However if necessity or even incli-
nation calls, the Crakes show no aversion to coming out into the
sunshine, especially for food, so that perhaps it is the hot sun
which causes them to retire to cooler by-ways.
They spend a large part of their time creeping, mouse-like, in
and out of nooks and crannies, as if trying to satisfy their genius
for exploration. Old petrel burrows fallen in, low-bending bushes
and grass tufts are searched with care and precision in this unend-
ing quest. As they walk their heads are thrust forward from side
to side, the very pictures of inquisitive interest. They used some-
394 Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. fo?
times to come up and peer at my shoes, with one foot poised in
air. Scarcely a thing escapes their beady red eyes. The smallest
spider or beetle is snapped up with as much avidity as a more
conspicuous seed.
We caught all our specimens in an ordinary dip-net. Usually it
was only necessary to place the net on the ground edgewise when
presently a rail would make its appearance and proceed to examine
the * new phenomenon * at close range. Often they would fairly
walk into the net, and Prof. J. O. Snyder obtained a photograph
illustrating this amusing incident.
In strolling through the brush we could hear the Crakes calling
here and there. Their song is a plaintive high-keyed little rattle
which resembles remotely an alarm clock with a muffled bell, or
pebbles ricocheting on a glass roof. I have observed them stand-
ing under bushes in the shade rattling away in this manner, with
swollen throats and bills slightly opened. I once saw two approach
one another, with feathers erect and heads lowered, and begin
rattling in each others face. Then they suddenly ceased and
slunk away in opposite directions.
At the house the little Rails walked about the veranda in search
of food with far less fear than the chickens, and while Prof. Snyder
and I were preparing specimens, not infrequently a Rail or two
would be walking under our chairs, searching for morsels of meat.
They took no notice of Albatrosses and other sea birds. I saw
two in a lively serpentine chase about a young Gony's legs, the
big creature appearing like an uncouth mammoth above the trim
little Rails.
They do not seem to exhibit any desire to fly, probably having
learned from experience that their wings are no longer to be
relied upon. I have only seen them spread their wings when
hopping up to a perch, or when running fast. I often chased
them to see if they could rise from the ground, but they would
not even try.
Their food consists of small insects, seeds, green material, and
sea-birds' eggs. Their beaks are rather weak, and I doubt if
they break any eggs except the thinner shelled ones of the terns.
I did not myself see the Rail actually puncture an tgg, but in
Rothschild's "Avifauna of Laysan," the following note from
Henry Palmer's diary is of interest.
^wtn^l Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. 395
" While out this morning both my assistant and I saw a little
Rail break and eat an ^g%. We had disturbed from its nest a
Noddy (Anous) ; immediately the Rail ran up and began to
strike at the ^g'g shell with its bill, but the ^g'g being large and
hard, he was quite a long time before making a hole. The Rail
would jump high into the air, and come down with all its force
on the ^%%^ until it accomplished the task, which once done the
t%% was soon emptied. By this time the Tern came back and
gave chase, but in vain." (Z. ^., pt. I, p. x.)
Porzanulas lurk about the outskirts of tern colonies all the time,
and I once had to frighten a Crake from the nest of 2i Tropic
Bird, while attempting to photograph the tgg* I also saw a Rail
rush at some Telespizas and drive them from a tern's t%^^ upon
which they were feeding, as related in the account of the Finch.
The Rail then set to and finished the repast, dragging the embryo
about in an ineffectual attempt to swallow it. With such habits
it is difficult tt) see how these creatures can ever seriously be at a
loss to find food.
The following episode illustrates, I think, very forcibly the fear-
lessness of these Rails. While photographing a nest, I propped
back the mass of sedge stems which obscured it. The camera
was only a few feet away, and during the adjusting of apparatus,
the Rail crept onto the eggs and energetically began to cover her-
self with the soft lining. After photographing her several times, I
lifted her off, and moved the camera still closer, but almost at
once she slipped back again, and settled down contentedly.
Then, with the focusing cloth I persuaded her to retire to the
tall grass, near at hand. I ran back to the camera, but on turn-
ing perceived my rail skipping across the flattened grasses in hot
pursuit, and I was able to make only a hasty inspection of the
ground-glass before she had settled on the nest again. It was
under these circumstances that Plate XV, figure 2, was secured.
Figure i of the same plate shows the Rail.
The Rails make their nests either in the midst of thick tussocks
of tall grass, near the ground, or else in close-matted clumps of a
juncus-like sedge, which grows in a narrow band along the outer-
most edge of the lagoon-plain, just where the area of bushy grass
and brush begins. We had only to walk over the tangled beds of
396 Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. \^l
this sedge, and watch where the Rails ran out, when a nest could
easily be found. It is placed on the ground at the end of a little
tunnel, about five or six inches long, and is a roundish cavity,
lined above and on all sides, except the little entrance way, with
soft dried stems. The eggs are deposited in a little bowl-shaped
hollow about four inches in diameter (PI. XV, Fig. 2). We found
several sets of threes and a few incomplete sets of twos. The
eggs are large in proportion to the bird, a typical specimen
measuring 31 by 21 millimeters, and in contour they are bluntly
ovate or elliptical ovate. The ground color is a pale olive buff,
closely and rather evenly spotted with pale clay color, or raw
sienna, and faint lilac gray. The clay color is brightest and pre-
dominates. All the eggs collected were fresh. The young appar-
ently begin to hatch about the middle of June.
Laysan Teal. Anas laysanensis Rothschild.
That an islet, scarcely three miles in its longest dimension and
fully three thousand miles from continental shores, should harbor
a peculiar species of the genus Anas, is, to say the least, surprising.
The birds themselves are scarcely less peculiar than their distri-
bution. Most of us picture ducks as among the wariest of wild-
fowl, but the Laysan Teal, though not exactly tame, are at any
rate quite unsophisticated.
I have little to record concerning their habits. They congregate
about a small sedge-bordered, brackish-water pond near the south
end of the lagoon. Here we saw them each day, sunning them-
selves, and preening their feathers on a little heap of rocks near
the center of the pond. We saw them also waddling about in
other parts of the island, but not commonly. Near the house
there was a pair which probably had a nest in the vicinity, for one
of them used to come up to the house after nightfall, and walk
about like a barn-yard fowl. Mr. Schlemmer said it was searching
for millers. Although these ducks can fly perfectly well, they
ordinarily did not take wing until approached within a few rods,
and then never went far. They much preferred to walk about,
which they did in twos and threes, gleaning their food as they
^°»w '^l Fisher, Birds of Laysan Island. 397
proceeded. The stomach of a male collected near the pond was
gorged, with small flies, resembling the common house-fly. We
did not observe any Teal near the ocean and it is probable they
never voluntarily take to salt water.
We discovered one nest within a couple of rods of the pond,
placed under a thick chenopodium bush. Six eggs of the palest
green — almost white — rested in a shallow bowl constructed of
long dry sedges. I wished if possible to secure a picture of the
female, so I photographed the eggs (PI. XVI, Fig. i) and left them
till the following morning. But when I returned to the nest, three
of the eggs had hatched, one young was half out, and another egg
picked. In taking the accompanying photograph (PI. XVI, Fig.
2), one of the ducklings had to be removed in order to show the
others. The type ^%% was preserved in alcohol. It measures 55
by 38 millimeters, and in contour is a blunt ovate.
A few days later Prof. Snyder saw three old birds with broods,
one of which took to the pond. I also saw a baby swimming
about, the rest of the family being somewhere in the sedge tangle.
These young resemble those of Mallards.
The Teal is the least common of the five species just considered,
and although I had no accurate method of estimating I would
place the total number of ducks considerably below one hundred.
It will be an ill day for all the birds on Laysan, if a cat, pig, or nion-
gpose is ever allowed to land. Any or all of these creatures would
make short work of eggs and young birds, and could break up
what is probably the most interesting community of sea-fowl in
the world.
39^ Clark, Black-winged Palm Tanager, focu
THE BLACK-WINGED PALM TANAGER.
BY AUSTIN H. CLARK.
Through the kindness of Mr. Outram Bangs, I have been
enabled to examine the large series of Tanagra palmarutn melan-
optera (Sclater) in his collection, as well as those in the collection
of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Cambridge.
The localities represented in the series, with the number of
specimens from each, are as follows: Panama, 19 ; Santa Marta,
I ; Margarita Island, 3; Trinidad, 2 ; "Venezuela," i ; Yacura,
Venezuela, i ; Lake Titicaca, Peru, 2. In addition to these
examples, I have, in my tabulation, made use of the measurements
given by Mr. Ridgway^ for skins from the following localities:
Costa Rica, 6 ; Panama, . 2 ; Trinidad, 2 ; British Guiana, i ;
Lower Amazons, 5; Rio Huallaga (Peru), 2. This brings the
whole number under discussion up to forty-seven.
For comparison, specimens of T, palmarutn palmarutn^ were
studied from Santarem (i), Bahia (i), and "Brazil" (3).
The object in view was to observe the variations of this sub-
species with regard to its geographical distribution, and to deter-
mine whether the northern bird, occurring about Panama, is
separable as a valid form, which Ridgway considers may prove to
be the case.
Dr. Sclater -^ gives the distribution of Tanagra palmarum as
"southern Brazil and Bolivia northward to Trinidad, Venezuela,
Colombia, Panama, and Costa Rica." The subspecies melanop-
tera is given 3 as occurring in the western part of South America,
from Nicaragua south to eastern Peru (type locality), and east to
Trinidad, including Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and the
Amazons valley. This restricts T, palmarum palmarum to east-
em and southeastern Brazil, north to British Guiana. Ridgway
says that in the same locality in the lower Amazons district,
examples occur, representing as to coloration, at least, both forms ;
* Birds of North and Middle America, Part II, p. 59.
' Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum, Vol. XI, p. 160.
^ Ridgway, loc. cit.
Vol. xx"!
Clark, Black'winged Palm Tanager,
399
while Sclater states that in Guiana (Demerara and the Mt. Ror-
aima region), Surinam (Dutch Guiana), and on the island of
Mexiqana (Lower Amazons), intermediate grades occur, the
olive-green edgings to the wing feathers in these specimens being
only slightly manifest. In the absence of material from these
localities, I cannot make any remarks on this point, but I merely
wish to call attention to the fact that, while Sclater regards melan-
optera as a good subspecies of Tanagra palmarum^ Ridgway is
inclined to consider them as entitled to full specific rank.
In the accompanying table are given the averages for all the
male specimens from the various points.
From the figures it will be seen at once that, as regards the wing,
the largest specimens are from Peru, while the smallest are from
Panama ; starting at Panama, the average rises west into Costa
Rica, and east, through Santa Marta, Yacura, and Margarita
Island, to Trinidad. The lower Amazons specimens are the same
size as those from Costa Rica, and are smaller than those from
Guiana and Trinidad.
Measurements of Tanagra falmarum melanoptera ScL.
Localities
Peru ....
Panama ....
Costa Rica
Santa Marta (i) Colombia
Yacura, Venezuela
Margarita Island
"Venezuela" (i)
Trinidad
British Guiana
Lower Amazons
Wing
98.8
90.8
94.2
93
94
96.3
100
97.2
97-5
94-7
Tail
76.9
68.2
71. 1
72
73
73-3
70.8
72.9
71.4
Ratio of
Wing
and tail
28
36
3^
29
28
31
37
37
33
32
Culmen
13-5
13.2
13
II
14
13
14
13
13.2
Tarsus
%
21
20
20.8
20
20
206
20
21
20.6
20.8
Tanagra falmarum palmarum Max.
Brazil
99
72.2
1.37
H-5
12.2
The tail measurements, however, do not vary in the same way.
Although the birds with the shortest tails are from Panama, those
^OO Clark, Black-winged Palm Tanager, Focl
with the next shortest come from Trinidad, while Margaritan
birds have the longest of any, with the exception of Peruvian
examples. Costa Rican birds are close to those from the lower
Amazons. ^
By dividing length of wing by length of tail, we obtain a ratio
between the two. An examination of these figures shows that
Peruvian birds have the longest tails proportionately, while those
from Trinidad have the shortest. Specimens from middle north-
ern Venezuela (Santa Marta, Yacura, and Margarita) and from
Costa Rica are intermediate. Those from Panama resemble most
closely Trinidad examples, while the lower Amazonian form agrees
with the Costa Rican.
In regard to the length of the chord of the culmen, birds from
Yacura, Margarita, and Trinidad exceed all others. Guianan and
Costa Rican specimens agree in having very short beaks, while
those from Peru, Panama, and the lower Amazons are intermediate.
Tarsal measurements show that Costa Rican and lower Ama-
zonian birds are identical in this character; while Trinidad and
Peruvian birds are pretty close, having the longest tarsi. Panama
specimens have shorter tarsi, agreeing with those from Guiana ;
Santa Marta and Yacura ones have the least of all, while the
Margaritan form is intermediate between them and the bird of
Trinidad.
In measurements the true T, palmarum paltnarum from south-
eastern Brazil is larger than the average of the subspecies melan-
optera examined in respect to length of wing, culmen, and tarsus ;
but in tail measurements it is near the Santa Martan bird. The
ratio between length of wing and length of tail is that of Trini-
dad ian melanoptera.
In short, then, the specimens of T, palmarum melanoptera from
Costa Rica show a striking similarity in all dimensions to those
from the lower Amazons. Peruvian birds are largest, except for
the beak, while Trinidad birds are near them in all respects save
in length of tail. Guianan birds are also close, having longer
tails than those from Trinidad. There seems to be a regular
gradation from Panama along the coast to Trinidad. The most
striking fact is the small size of the Panama birds as compared
with those from Costa Rica on the west and Santa Marta and
Yacura on the east.
^*i<W^] Clark, Black-winged Palm Tanager, 40I
There seems to be no constant variation in color; but this
character is uncertain in these birds, and differences are to be
met with in specimens from the same locality. The violet gloss
is the most noticeable feature. This gloss is, however, mainly
confined to the distal portion of the feather, and seems to undergo
considerable diminution, often a month before the feathers are
renewed again. Even in fresh specimens from the same place
the difference is considerable, some, apparently adult, having
almost none, while others have it very strongly marked.
From the data just given, it appears that, as would be expected,
the largest specimen come from the high mountains of Peru.
Here doubtless food is comparatively scarce, and a bird must
cover a considerable area in order to obtain a sufficient supply.
Size, therefore, is a distinct advantage. The lower Amazons sup-
ports a small race. Food here is abundant, and so natural selec-
tion is not called upon so urgently to weed out the smaller and
weaker individuals. The race is small at Panama for the same
reason ; while mountainous Costa Rica, Santa Marta, Yacura, and
Margarita are inhabited by larger birds. Very likely the birds on
Trinidad are stragglers from the rough and barren Venezuelan
shore, where the small ones have been eliminated.
The series examined contains two interesting specimens. One
has a peculiarly long and narrow bill, but is otherwise apparently
normal. This bird, a male, was taken on Margarita Island, and
was noticed in * The Auk * for July, 1902, p. 266.
The other is a partial albino. It is a young male\ and was
taken at Loma del Leon, Panama, on March 3, 1900. The left
wing has the proximal secondary attenuated, short, and with its
basal and central portions white. The next secondary is normal ;
but the third has a large white distal patch, extending inwards
15 mm. from the tip of the feather. The patch is central in posi-
tion, and does'' not reach the border on either side. From the
appearance of both these feathers the condition may be patho-
logical.
The Black-winged Palm Tanager is very common on the island
of Trinidad, where it can be seen at almost any time about the
' Collection of E. A. and O. Bangs, No. 7467.
A.02 Snodgrass, Geosfiza^ Cocornis^ and Certhidia. LoctT
gardens in Port-of-Spain. It is very active and restless. The
song of this bird is unlike that of any of ours, being a quick
ascending succession of notes, pitched very high. There is a
suggestion of panting and of effort in the song, and its high key,
which makes it somewhat squeaky, is rather disagreeable.
NOTES ON THE ANATOMY OF GEOSPIZA,
COCORNIS, AND CERTHIDIA.
BY ROBERT E. SNODGRASS.
Plates XVII-XX.
Geospiza and Certhidia are the two distinctively peculiar avian
genera of the Galapagos Islands. The former consists of a large
number of species and varieties, and has always been regarded as
belonging to the family Fringillidae. Certhidia^ consisting of
eight varieties comprised in two species, was formerly placed in
the Ccerebidae, but both Lucas and Ridgway now regard it as
belonging to the Mniotiltidae. Cocorttis is known only from the
small island of Cocos, lying off the Gulf of Panama and northeast
of the Galapagos Islands about four degrees north of the equator.
It consists of one known species, and has always been assigned to
the Fringillidae. But it has probably been so classified more on
account of its general resemblance to Geospiza than from a con-
sideration of its own characters.
In all structural points Cocornis really resembles Certhidia more
than it resembles Geospiza. To be sure, the adult males of
Cocornis and of most of the Geospiza species are almost plain
black, while the adults of Certhidia are gray with admixtures of
olive and brownish. Yet, in the shape of the bill and in the struc-
ture of the skull Certhidia and Cocornis are almost identical. On
the other hand, the structural differences between Cocornis and
Geospiza are slight — the slender-billed Geospiza differ from
Cocornis in the characters of the skull and skeleton of the bill,
^'i7<w^J Snodgrass, Geosfiza^ Cocotnis^ and Certhidia. 4^3
scarcely more than Cocornis does from Certhidia, The difference
is not nearly so great as that between the slender-billed and the
thick-billed forms of Geospiza itself. Hence, a study of the
characters of these three genera, is suggestive of a possible deri-
vation of Geospiza from Cocornis and of Cocornis from Certhidia,
This, however, would place Geospiza in the Mniotiltidae 1
In the descriptions of the skulls following it will be shown that
the Geospiza skull departs widely from that of any ordinary Frin-
gillid species. The writer, however, does not possess enough
knowledge of comparative avian anatomy to venture any theory
on the correct classification of the three genera discussed, or on
their possible interrelationships. A few facts are set forth^in the
hope that they may be of value to others.
It is probably not impossible that Geospiza ^ Cocornis^ and Cer-
thidia may be genetically related. Cocos Island is not very dis-
tant from the Galapagos, and an ancestral Geospiza could easily
have gotten there from the latter place. Moreover the climate
and flora are utterly different on Cocos and the Galapagos, and
the conditions look very unfavorable for convergent evolution.
Some authors have claimed a common geological origin for the
islands. In such a case we would look for a relationship at least
between Cocornis and Geospiza.
A study of the plumage phases of the Geospizce shows that they
are most probably descended from a plain yellowish-olivaceous
bird. They advance through six stages from this to the entirely
black phase. The lowest forms never go beyond the third stage,
being in this plumage when adult. ^ Therefore, Cocornis must
have branched off from one of the higher groups, for it is black in
the adult stage. This conclusion is not endangered by the fact
that it is antagonistic to the assumption that the bill and skull of
Cocornis are intermediate between those of Certhidia and the
lowest Geospiza, There are four groups of Geospiza separable on
a color basis, and in each the evolution of the bill has been inde-
pendent. The lowest members of the higher groups have bills
more similar to the Certhidian bill than have those of the lowest
* Discussed in Papers from Hopkins-Stanford Galapagos Expedition, No.
— , Birds, Snodgrass and Heller (MS.), Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci., Vol.
404 Snodgrass, Geospiza^ Cocornis^ and Cerihidia. LOct
group, and it is between the former and Cerihidia that Cocornis is
really intermediate. The theory above suggested involves the
assumption that the four groups of Geospiza became differentiated
in color before the great variation in the bill took place, and con-
sequently, that Cocornis branched off from one of the melanistic
groups comparatively late in Geospizan history. Such an assump-
tion is entirely in harmony with the facts discussed by Mr.
Edmund Heller and the writer in the paper referred to above in
the footnote. The fact that large groups of Geospiza are defi-
nitely characterized by color, while there is an infinite amount of
specific and subspecific variation in the bill, would indicate that
the color differences were evolved and stereotyped long before
the bill variation began.
What immature stages of Cocornis are known indicate that the
adult males reach the black phase through paler phases similar to
those of Geospiza, Certhidia, both in the adult and immature
stages, is of a plain, pale and comparatively uniform coloration.
I. The Skull.
In order to show more strikingly the wide departure that the
Geospiza skull makes from the ordinary Passerine type, a descrip-
tion of one of the most specialized forms will be given first. The
descriptions of other species follow in the order of decreasing
modification.
Geospiza strenua Gould (Plate XVII, Figs, i and 2). — Ridges
of sides and posterior part of skull strikingly prominent ; temporal
crests parallel ; interorbital area on top of skull parallel-sided and
almost as wide as the inter-temporal area. In general the cranium,
viewed from above, has a curious resemblance to a rodent's skull.
Top of head very smooth. Highest point between tips of squa-
mosal processes ; profile descending from here to lambdoidal crest
in a regular curve, to base of culmen less steeply and in more
nearly a straight line. Space between temporal crests transversely
flat, /. ^., the crests are coincident with the dorsal profile. Inter-
orbital area much wider than long, depressed mesially and decli-
vent toward each lateral margin, the anterior margin nearly
straight. Postfrontal process large, trihedral and unciform. Tern-
^*iooi^] Snodgrass, Geospiza^ Cocomis^ and Certkidia. 4^5
poral crest extremely large and high up on side of cranium,
curves upward and posteriorly from posterior angle of base of
postfrontal process, posteriorly it curves downward and ends in
rather prominent process above ear. This crest is greatly larger
than in such thick-billed genera as Cardinalis and Zamelodia (PI.
XVII, Fig. 3) . In these latter forms also the crest is far below
the dorsal profile of the cranium.
Temporal area very long, its length, from one extremity of tem-
poral crest to the other, equal to distance from anterior end of
crest to nostril. This gives an extremely great postorbital length
to the skull, the whole configuration of the cranium being very dif-
ferent from that of any ordinary Passerine skull. Surface of tem-
poral area slightly depressed and roughened, lacking the glazed
appearance of top of skull. Squamosal process very large, its
lower end reflexed posteriorly and lying well behind tip of post-
frontal process. In Cardifialis the tip of the squamosal process is
slightly in advance of the tip of the post-frontal process. Crota-
phyte depression between post-frontal and squamosal processes
^ide and deep.
Tympanic region flat and almost vertical. Lambdoidal crest
prominent, but smaller than temporal ; median part horizontal ;
lateral parts deflexed and then curved inward, terminating on
each side at base of a prominent mastoid process back of lower
part of ear opening. This mastoid process is absent or but
poorly developed in other Passerine genera examined as well as
in other species of Geospiza, Posterior surface of skull receding,
/. e,j when zygomatic bar is horizontal, it extends downward and
slightly forward below lambdoidal crest.
Interorbital septum complete, very thick, and composed of a
double wall. Preorbital parts of skull of ordinary Fringillid
character. Rim of orbit rather thick and heavy in appearance
on account of deflexion of lateral part of interorbital area on top
of skull. In Zamelodia J Cardinal is ^ Pipilo^ Carpodacus^ Astragali-
nus^ and in other species of Geospiza the interorbital surface is
evenly concave, giving the orbital rim a much thinner appearance.
On posterior wall of orbital cavity are three conspicuous, vertical,
crest-like ridges. Lower end of outer one forms a process visible
laterally projecting from lower part of crotaphyte depression.
F AUK. VCL- XX.
PLATE XVII,
NATOMV OF Cl^USPEZA, COCORJfIS, AND CERTHIDIA.
Vol. XX
1903
J SxoDGRASS, Geospiza^ Cocornis^ and Certkidia. 4^7
Geospiza fortis and G, propinqua possess similar ridges. In G,
fuliginosa and G, scandens there are only traces of them. They
are present in some form, either as plates or ridges, in most Passer-
ine skulls, varying greatly in size, but in G. strenua they are far
larger than in any other skull examined by the writer.
The most striking feature about the skull of the thick-billed
Geospiza is the abrupt angle that the tomium of the upper mandi-
ble forms with the zygomatic bar. In G, strenua this angle is
118°. The same angle in Cardinalis is 140°. That is, the
defiexure of the upper mandible from the horizontal is 62° in G,
strenua and only 40° in Cardinalis, In G, strenua the distal
half of the bony ctilmen forms an angle of 90° with the basal part
of the culmen back of the nostril. This angulation is conspicuous
in all the species of Geospiza^ although not so great in the smaller-
billed forms, and is characteristic of the genus. In Cardinalis
and Zamelodia there is no such angulation of the culmen in these
genera, as well as in smaller-billed Fringillidae, the culmen forms
an even curve from base to tip.
Nasal bones large, the inferior or descending arm of each thick,
and forming nearly a right angle with zygomatic bar. Nostril
triangular, of almost an isosceles shape, lower rim horizontal and
on a level with upper edge of zygoma. Width of base of upper
mandible contained 2 J times in greatest posterior width of
.cranium; depth i^ times in greatest posterior depth. Internasal
septum complete.
Ix)ngitudinal bars of palatines thick, diverging slightly posteri-
orly, outward and downward, so that posterior ends lie below
level of zygomatic bar. Posterior ends blunt. Superior internal
laminae large, widened at dorsal edges and solidly fused with
rostrum of sphenoid, not projecting back of anterior ends of
pterygoids. Inferior internal laminae well developed. Lower
mandible extremely large, being specially deep just back of mid-
dle through coronoid process. Depth here more than a third of
the length.
Geospiza fortis fortis Ridgway (Plate XVII, Figs. 4 and 5). —
This is one of the species with but a moderately large bill. The
interorbital area of the top of the skull is much narrower than
in G, strenua^ being contained 2J times in the distance betw^an
AOo Snodgrass, Geosptza^ Cotoniis^ and Certhidia, Locl
the temporal crests. The surface is simply concave instead of
doubly convex. The temporal crests are relatively small and lie
far below the dorsal profile of the cranium, the space between
them being strongly arched instead of flat transversely. The
space between the postfrontal and squamosal processes is rela-
tively narrower than in G, strenua^ but the former process ends in
advance of the other. The interorbital septum is thin, and is
perforated at its upper posterior angle by a hole which is a part
also of a foramen opening into the cranial cavity on each posterior
orbital wall.
The angle of the tomium of the upper mandible with the zygo-
matic bar is 122**; /. ^., the deflexure of the mandible is 58®.
This is 4** less than the deflexure in G, strenua. The angulation
of the culmen is about the same in the two species. The inter-
nasal septum is not complete in G.foriis^ forming simply a deep
median keel on the under surface of the nasal bones.
The lower mandible is slenderer than in G, strenua and the
coronoid process is not so high.
Gcospiza fuUginosa parviila (Gould). (Plate XVII, Figs. 6 and
7.) — The structure of the skull in this species is very similar to
that of G. fortis^ but in it the points in which the G, fortis skull
departs from the G, strenua skull are still more intensified. Both
the temporal and lambdoidal crests are comparatively slight. The
temporal crests are situated far down on the sides of the skull,
and the top of the skull between them is high and roundly convex.
The interorbital space is narrow and simply concave.
The angulation of the culmen is considerably less than in the
other two species described. The deflexure of the upper mandi-
ble from the horizontal of the zygoma is 50°. This is 8° less than
in G, fortis. The nasal septum is entirely lacking.
This is one of the smaller-billed species of Geospiza and the
skull differs conspicuously from that of G, strenua in the much
slenderer upper mandible and in the general lighter appearance
of the preorbital parts. The basal depth of the upper mandible
is contained 2 J times in the greatest depth of the cranium.
Geospiza fuUginosa acutirostris (Ridgway). (PI. XVII, Figs. 8
and 9.) — The skull of this form differs from that of G,fpanmla
in the slightly slenderer, more tapering and less deflexed upper
^'^Q03 ^1 Snodgrass, Geospiza^ Cocortiis^ and Certhidia. 4^9
mandible. The temporal crest is nearly obsolete, and the tem-
poral area below it is less extensive than in G, /, panmla. The
interorbital septum is so thin that it is almost membranous.
The angulation of the culmen is inconspicuous. The deflexure of
the upper tomium is about 48°.
The shape of the nostril changes serially in the four skulls
described. In G. strenua the nostril is almost an isosceles triangle
with the base on a line with the upper edge of the zygoma. In
the smaller-billed species, however, the upper angle becomes
moved successively farther back, and the angle that the descend-
ing process of the nasal forms with the zygoma, which is almost
90** in G, strenua, slightly decreases. In G, f. acutirostris the
upper angle of the nostril lies behind the vertical from the pos-
terior basal angle.
The lower mandible is very slender and there is almost no
coronoid process.
Geospiza scandens fatigata (Ridgway). (Plate XVII, Figs. 16,
17, and 18.) — The Geospiza group, characterized by a long slender
bill, includes a number of forms that were once regarded as con-
stituting a separate genus called Cactornis, The supposed spe-
cies were separated on characters that have since been found to
intergrade in such a manner that they can better be regarded as
varieties of one species of Geospiza. Of this group, which has
been reduced to the species G. scandens, the subspecies G. s.
fatigata may be taken as typical.
There is far less difference between the skulls of G. scandens and
G, fuliginosa than there is between the skulls of the latter species
and G, strenua. That is, the former genus Cactornis did not differ
in cranial structure from the simpler forms of Geospiza nearly
as much as did the species in this genus, as at first limited, differ
from one another.
The temporal and lambdoidal crests are almost identical with
those of G. fuliginosa. The tip of the postfrontal process lies but
slightly before the tip of the squamosal process. The fronto-nasal
suture is deeply concave. It is more concave than in G.f acutiros-
trisy in the latter species more so again than in G.fortis, while in G.
strenua it is almost straight. The angle of the descending proc-
ess of the nasal with the zygoma is still less than in G.f, acutirostris,
The Auk. Vol. XX,
Plate XVIII.
XATOMV OF GKOSPIZA, CnCdRXIS, AND CEKTiKDlA
ilxM^J SkodgrasSj Gcospiza^ Cocorn/Sj and Cerf/iidia. AH
and the upper angle of the nostril is correspondingly farther back.
The angulation of the base of the culmen is slight, and the deflex-
ure of the upper tomium is about 45°, being a little less than in G.
/. acuiirostris.
As will be seen later, the skull of G. scan dens approaches most
closely to that of the genus Cocornis, The skull of G,f. acutirostris
is nearest in size to the Cocornis skull, but in structure the G,
scandens skull is almost intermediate between the two.
A digression from the series will now be made to describe the
skull of the Geospizan group having a strongly curved culmen.
Geospiza crassirostris (Gould). (Plate XVII, Figs. 14 and 15.)
— This species may be taken as a typical example of the Geospiza
species formerly included in a separate genus called Camarhyncfiiis^
a group characterized by having the culmen strongly curv^ed.
The skull of G, crassirostris is in every way very similar to that
of G, fortis. About the only difference is that the culmen is a lit-
tle more convex than in G, fortis, and the upper mandible is deeper
in front of the nostril. The crests of the two skulls have about the
same development, the interorbital areas are the same, the upper
mandibles have the same deflexure, the nostrils are alike, the
descending processes of the nasals form the same angle with the
zygoma, and the post-frontal and squamosal processes have the
same relative positions.
A study of the Geospiza skulls shows, then, that the various
species and varieties are related to one another mostly in a serial
manner. That is, evolution in the group has not been along lines
radiating from a common centre, but has consisted principally of
successive modifications along one line. This same thing is
evinced by a study of the color phases of the plumage.
Cocornis agassizi Townsend (PI. XVII, Figs. 10 and 11}. — The
general characters of the skull are almost identical with those of
G,/. acutirostris or G, scandens. The upper mandible, however, is
relatively a little slenderer than in either of these, and the deflex-
ure of the tomium is about 40°. This is about 5° less than in G.
scandens,
Certhidia olivacea lutcola (Ridgway). (PI. XVII, Figs. 12 and
13.) — The skull of Ccrthidia is extremely similar to that of Cocor-
412 S'SOUGfLASs^ Geosptzoy CocotMt's^ and Certkidia. foct!
nis. It differs from the latter in about the same way that the
Cocornis skull differs structurally from the skull of G, scand^ns.
That is, the upper mandible is slenderer and less deflexed. The
angle of deflexure in C. o, luieola (and the bill does not vary
in the genus) is about 35^. This is just as much smaller than
the deflexure in Cocornis as the latter is than the deflexure in
G, scandens.
From the foregoing descriptions it is evident that the species of
the three genera under consideration can be arranged in a graded
series according to the structure of the skull. Such a series
would begin with the members of Certhidia, all of which have very
slender and gently deflexed bills. Following Certhidia comes
Cocornis with a slender but more deflexed bill. Separated from
Cocornis by a step no greater than that from Certhidia to Cocornis
comes Gfospiza scandens. This species, although structurally
intermediate between those on each side of it, makes a digression
as to size, being much larger than either Cocornis or G, fuliginosa
acutirostris which otherwise follows G, scandens in the series.
From G, f. acutirostris the series is uninterrupted to such forms
as G^. strenua and G. magnirostris in which the bill is enormously
large and the upper mandible greatly deflexed, and in which the
skull has an almost un bird-like appearance on account of the curi-
ous shape and the great development of the crests.
All that the writer here intends is simply to call attention to the
fact that there is a gradation in the skull characters of these three
genera, progressing by almost equal steps from one extreme to
the other. If any phylogenic theory can be based on this fact
then the classification of the three genera accepted at present can-
not be correct, for Certhidia is regarded as a member of the
Mniotiltidae and Geospiza and Cocornis are placed in the Frin-
gillidae. The Geospizce as birds have certainly a most Fringillid
appearance. The same, however, cannot be so positively asserted
concerning the skull of even the least modified species.
A study of the bills of nestlings would probably have little
phylogenetic value. Three stages in the growth of G, fuliginosa
parvula are shown in Plate XVIII, figures 23, 24 and 25.
THE AUK. VOL. XX.
Plate XIX.
AHATOUY OF CEOSPIZA, COCORNIS, AND CBRTHIDM.
414 Snodgrass, Geosfizat Cocornis^ and Certhidia. Loct!
II. The Thoracic Skeleton.
The sternum, shoulder girdle and ribs show no such modifica-
tions as does the skull. The drawings of the parts in Cocomis
agassizi (PI. XVIII, figs. 19. 20, 22) may be taken as typical for
all three genera. The sternum and shoulder girdle are of ordi-
nary Passerine form. The ribs are somewhat variable. There
are always seven that are well developed and generally there is
a small eighth rib. The latter is sometimes a mere bar lying back
of the lower part of the neural arm of the seventh, but often it is
composed of distinct neural and haemal segments. The second
to fifth ribs inclusive always have large uncinate processes. On
the sixth rib there is sometimes present a well developed uncinate
process, but it is often rudimentary and is frequently absent.
Such variations as these have no phylogenetic significance, for
they take place between closely related species and also in dif-
ferent individuals of the same species.
III. The Tongue.
Geospiza (PI. XX, Figs. 34-38, and 40). — The tongue of Geo-
spiza has a simple tapering shape, varying in length and thickness
according to the form of the bill. The thin terminal margin is
bifid and somewhat frayed. The upper surface is usually convex,
but it is often slightly and sometimes deeply grooved longitudinally.
This last character, however, varies between closely related species
and even in the same species (Figs. 34 and 37). Geospiza is
mostly granivorous but partly insectivorous.
Certhidia (PI. XX, Fig. 41). — The tongue in this genus is the
same as in the slender-billed species of Geospiza^ except that it is
more constantly grooved above. It is slender, tapering and bifid
at the tip. Certhidia is insectivorous.
Cocomis (PI. XX, Figs. 39 and 42). — In this genus the tongue
is very long and slender. It is deeply grooved above, and
expanded, bifid and greatly frayed out at the tip (Fig. 39) . It
differs considerably, as the figures will show, from the tongues of
both Certhidia and Geospiza, The food of Cocornis has not been
determined, but probably consists mostly of insects.
The Auk, Vol. XX.
ANATOMY OF GKOSPIZA, COCORNIS, AND CERTHIDIA.
416 Snodgrass, Geospnoy CocorniSy and Certkidia* Co?
IV. The Alimentary "Canal.
No descriptions need be given of the alimentary canals. Fig-
ures 27 to 33 on Plate XIX sufficiently show the intestinal windings
in several species of Geospiza and also in Cocomis and CerthUia,
It will be seen that there is no essential difference here between
the three genera.
V. Ptervlosis.
The pterylosis is identical in the three genera. Figures 21 and
26 of Plate XVIII, representing the feathered areas of Cocomis
agassiziy could serve just as well for either Certhidia or Geospiza,
The dorsal tract extends down the back of the neck and between
the shoulders as a narrow, median band. On the middle of the
back it expands into a wide, fusiform area reaching to the
anterior part of the lumbosacral region. Here it again contracts
to a narrow band, narrowest between the acetabula, and go"fes
caudally to the oil-gland. The ventral tract begins as a median
band on the anterior half of the throat. Just below the middle it
divides into two bands that go outward and caudally as wide
tracts along the sides of the breast. Behind the sternum each
becomes again narrow, and goes caudally and inward along the
side of the abdomen, ending near the anus. At the shoulder eiich
lateral ventral tract gives off laterally the shoulder tract which
divides into the alar and humeral tracts.
Explanation of the Plates.
•
Plate XVII. Skulls. Figs, i and 2, Geospiza strenua ; 3, Zamelodia
mclanocephala ; 4 and 5, Geospiza fortis fqrtis ; 6 and 7,
G. fuliginosa parvula\ 8 and 9, G, fuUginosa acutirostris ;
10 and II, Cocorm's agassizi; 12 and 13, Certhidia olivacea
lHteola\ 14 and 15, Geospiza crassirostris\ 16, 17 and 18,
Cr. scandens fatigata.
Plate XVIIL Fig. 19, Cocornis agassizi^ inner view of^ bones at shoulder;
20, C. agassizi, side view of thoracic skeleton; 21, C.
aga ss iz i, Ycniral pterylosis; 22, C, agassizi\ ventral view
of sternum ; 23, 24 and 25, Geospiza fuliginosa parvnla^
^ wo?^] DUTCHER AND Baily, Habits of ike Herring Gull. 4 1 7
sfde view of head of three nestling stages — primaries 4
mm., 13 mm. and 32 mm. long, respectively ; 26, Cocornis
agassiziy dorsal ptcrylosis.
Plate XIX, Alimentary Canals. — Fig. 27, Geospiza conirostris coui-
rostris (length 205 mm ); 28, G.fuliginosa parvula (length
170 mm.) ; 29, G. fortis dubia (length 204 mm.) ; 30, G.
crassirostris (length 255 mm.) ; 31, G. scandens fatigata
(length 200 mm.); 32, Certhidia olivacea luteola (length
102 mm.) ; 33, Cocornis agassizi (length 125 mm.).
Plate XX, Tongues. — Fig. 34, Geospiza scandens fatigata\ 35, G,
habeli'y 36, G. fortis fortis \ 37, G. scandens fatigata \ 38,
G, prosthemelas\ 39, Cocornis agassizi^ tip of tongue; 40,
Geospiza fuliginosa parvula\ 41, Certhidia olivacea luteola\
42, Cocornis agassizi.
A CONTRIBUTION TO THE LIFE HISTORY OF THE
HERRING GULL {LARUS ARGENTATUS) IN
THE UNITED STATES.
BY WILLIAM DUTCHER AND WILLIAM L. BAILV.
Plates XXI and XXII,
The facts presented in this paper are the results of several
visits to the large breeding colonies of Herring Gulls on the
Maine coast, made at the following dates: by Mr. Dutcher, 1900,
from June 28 to July 21 ; 1 901, by both contributors, from June 12
to 24; 1902, by Mr. Baily, from July 18 to 20 inclusive. In 1900
visits were made to nearly all of the colonies along the Maine
coast by the senior contributor, commencing at the most westerly
one on No-Man 's-Land Island, which is situated about seventeen
miles south of Rockland, Maine, and adjoins the large island
known as Matinicus. In 190 1 eight days were spent at the light-
house station on Great Duck Island, and subsequently nearly all
of the other colonies were revisited by Mr. Dutcher. In 1902 Mr.
Baily revisited the Great Duck Island colony later in the season,
in order to observe the methods of feeding the young birds and
the habits of the young. A description of the position and
4 1 8 Di TCHER AND Baily, Habits of the Herring Gull. \ ^
topography of Great Duck Island will answer for all of the island
colonies, as in the main they greatly resemble each other. Great
Duck Island is situated in 44° 9' N. Lat. and 68° 15' W. Lon.,
being an outlying island seven miles south of Mount Desert
Island.
The citizens of Maine have reason to be proud of the gull
homes in their State, and it is a civic obligation to care for and
preserve them. One of the first duties of the patriotic citizen is
to carefully conserve the natural objects in his locality ; any one
who would destroy them, especially for commercial purposes, is
lacking in that uplifting sentiment that develops in man or woman
a respect for the rights of others, and a love of country and fire-
side. The writer who commands and wields the most facile pen
cannot fully describe the life or beauty of one of the great breeding
homes of these gulls, nor can the most accurate photograph convey
to the reader more than a faint picture of the bright blue sky, the
sparkling sea, the graceful motion of the birds circling overhead ;
nor can it add the roar of the surf on the rocky shore, nor the
weird and angry cries and screams of the anxious gulls. The
colony at Great Duck Island is without doubt one of the largest
now existing in the United States.
The shore of the island is bold and rocky, and, as the tides rise
and fall about thirteen feet, at low water great tracts of kelp rock-
weed are uncovered, among which the gulls find large quantities
of food, such as Crustacea and other marine life. At every low
tide that occurs during daylight, numbers of gulls may be seen
gleaning in the kelp beds, or gathered in groups sunning them-
selves or preening their feathers.
At high water the upper ledges of rocks are used for assembling
and resting places. The surface of the island is somewhat rolling,
and in the open is covered with grass and weeds, of not very
luxuriant growth, as the soil seems to be very poor, being com-
posed of decayed wood and sand. The trees are principally
spruce and fir, but none are of very large size. On the southern
end of the island nearly all the trees have been cut and the dead
tops and branches, together with many large trunks, have been
left among the stumps, making a tangle very difficult to penetrate.
At the extreme southern point of the island /the United States
\
THE AUK VOL, XX.
HEKKINd UULLS, CKLAl' DUCK ISLAND, ME, PROTECTED COLONV.
!ll
mi
I
!1
V..1. XX
■•903
j DuTCHER AND Baily, Habits of the Herring GuU. 419
Lighthouse Department owns a reservation of about two acres.
This contains the light tower, three dwellings, engine room, two
boat houses, and a long tank-shed for catching rainwater for the
fog-whistle engines. The greatest elevation of the island is about
sixty feet, the average being about tsventy-five feet above high-
water mark. The gulls occupy the southern end of the island and
are divided into two parts, which may be designated as the east
and west colonies. In the former in 1901 there were about
tsvelve hundred birds, and in the latter about eighteen hundred.
In 1902 the area of the colony was somewhat larger than the pre-
vious year, extending about a hundred yards further northward in
the western colony. Probably 3500 birds were breeding, 500
more than last year; on July 15 hundreds of young birds, from a
day to three and a half weeks old, were scattered over the two
breeding areas.
On our arrival at the island in 1901 nest building and laying
was practically completed. One belated gull, however, built and
occupied a nest after that date, which afforded us some insight
into the method of construction. It was located on a tiat rock, as
some hundreds of nests were. The rock nests, usually, did not
have any stick or twig foundations, but were built of grass, weeds,
mosses, lichens, some kelp, either green or dry, feathers, wool,
bark, and small bits of drift and rotten wood, all laid upon the
rock and formed by the birds into shallow bowls. This special
nest was built entirely of fresh green material, and was, when first
seen, a flat, scattered mass without any form whatever. It con-
tained one ^%g^ the bird probably having been ready to deposit it
before the nest was completed. On several occasions single eggs
were found where there were no nests. A few hours later this
nest was visited and in the interim the bird had formed it into the
usual shape. The nests built upon the ground were almost
exactly like the rock nests. Those built on trees or upturned
stumps, had a solid foundation of sticks and twigs, and sur-
mounting this the usual form and make of nest. The tree nests
are always placed on a flat branch or top of a spruce or fir, one of
which was in one about twenty-five feet high ; however, they are
not common on Duck Island, there being only about a dozen.
The grass in many of the nests was dead and brown, but it is
420 DuTCHER AND Baily, Habits of ike Herring GnlL [^ ^
not certain that it was so when first placed there, although it is
probable that the larger portion is old grass. During incubation
the weight of the setting bird breaks down or packs the nests, so
they are continually being repaired and built up around the edges
with new material, which is always green grass or weeds, the effect
being very pretty indeed. On several occasions gulls were seen
gathering this material in their bills. The grass is bitten off or
pulled up by the roots until the bird has a ball in its bill larger
than a man's fist. This material is gathered where it is most
plentiful and is usually carried by flight to the nest site.
The bowl of the nest varies very little in size, but some founda-
tions are larger than others, depending somewhat upon the
location of the nest. The following measurements are of fiests
selected as good types :
No. I. Depth of bowl, three inches; from top of nest to ground, ten
inches ; diameter of nest at top, ten inches, at base, twenty-four inches.
No. 2. Depth of bowl, three inches; from top to ground, five inches;
diameter at top, ten inches, at base, eighteen inches.
No. 3. Depth of bowl, two and one quarter inches ; diameter at top,
nine inches, at base thirteen inches. This nest was built on the ground
against a small side hill so that only one side had to be finished.
No. 4. Depth of bowl, two and one half inches; diameter at top, nine
inches, at base fifteen inches.
Many other nests were measured and examined, and the average size
of the bowl was found to be about ten inches in diameter and three inches
in depth.
To obtain a fair average of the size of the eggs, measurements of four-
teen eets were made as follows :
No. I. Set, 3 2|gXit| 2^;jXi|i 2IJX1H
2 " 3 2BX1H ^\\y.l 2|JXiH
3 "I 2tiX2
4 " 3 3 XiH 3 XiU 2HX1H
5 " 3 2HX1H 2HX1IJ 211X2
6 " 3 2HX1H 2HXilJi 2HXilt
7 " 3 2liX2TV 2^X2 2^iX2
8 " 3 3rVX2 3X2 3X2
9 "2 3 XiH 2^5 X ill
10 " 3 2Hxili 21} X 2 2tixilJ
II " 3 2A-XitJ 2{iXi}J 2liXi}|
12 " 2 I^JXliV 21JXUJ
13 " 3 3AXi}i 3 X 2 2lJXiH
^ «w^] DUTCHKR AND Baily, Habits of the Herring Gull. 42 I
It is remarkable how quickly the eye can detect any variation
in the size of an egg, as by it the shape is entirely changed.
The abnormal egg in set No. 12 was infertile. Capt. Stanley,
head keeper of the lighthouse, was requested to watch the nest, and
he reported later that the two eggs completed the set, and that
the small egg did not hatch, but the other one did, bringing forth
a healthy chick. Only three runt eggs were found among the 3500
or 3600 eggs in the two colonies.
The color of the eggs varied in a remarkable degree. The
ground colors were light sky blue, dead blue, light blue-gray,
light gray-blue, dark lilac gray, light gray, light pea-green, green
drab, warm drab, ochre drab, pink drab, light brown, and
cinnamon.
The colors of the markings were chocolate, brown, rich brown,
light brown, snuff brown, asphalt, black, lilac, mauve. The
shapes of markings were almost infinite, — large and small spots,
indistinct specks, blotches, lines and irregular streaks, somewhat
like the markings on the eggs of blackbirds. One egg was found
with a light sky blue ground color with tiny indistinct specks of
lilac and light brown. Some of the markings were so confluent
that they resulted in a distinct ring around the egg.
Among the many hundred sets of eggs seen the usual number
was three, rarely two, and more infrequently one. Only one set
of four was found, which was on Heron Island, in Penobscot Bay ;
in other respects the set was normal.
Regarding incubation, Capt. Stanley pointed out the nest ia which
the first eggs were laid in the season of 1901, which were as yet
unhatched ; they were subsequently watched very closely, being
visited a number of times daily. On Tuesday, June 18, in the after-
noon, one of the eggs commenced to show signs of hatching ; the
shell was cracking about one inch from the large end. On Wed-
nesday afternoon the cracked portion had broken open so that a
part of the bill of the chick could be seen. The other two eggs
had also become pipped or cracked. About 3 p.m. on Thursday
the first bird was out of the shell and was not yet dry. It was a
very weak and helpless object, so much so that it could not stand
for more than a moment, when it would lie down, and even its
head would be flat in the nest. On Friday morning, a little after
A 2 2 DuTCHER AND Baily, HabUs of the Herring Gull. f q^j
5 o'clock, we found the second chick, it having come out during
the night. The first chick, however, was strong enough on our
approach to run from the nest and hide under a nearby stump
(Plate XXII ) . The oldest bird was placed in the nest again and
the two photographed with the third ^gg, which was now so
opened that the bill of the chick showed. When the young chicks
are hatched the egg shell divides very evenly at the point where
the bill of the young appears. The discarded shells are never
found in the nest but are carried by the old birds some feet away.
About the middle of the afternoon on Friday the third chick was
hatched, thus making an interval of about twelve hours between
the hatching of each ^gg. When the third ^gg had hatched the
other two young birds were found hiding under nearby stumps,
not to get out of the sun or cold, for it was a warm cloudy day.
The instinct to hide seems to be developed within an hour or two
after hatching, or so soon as the young bird is strong enough to
walk. The young in tree nests also seem to have sense enough
not to walk off the edge of the nest, for in 1902 Mr. Baily found
young at least ten days old in a tree nest. The young when very
small have a weak, peeping note that cannot be heard at any
great distance ; this seems, however, more a petulant cry for food
than of fear or anger, for it is not uttered when the young chicks
are handled, nor do they make any outcry then, even up to the
time that they are large enough to fly a few feet ; however, the
young birds can protect themselves by giving very sharp bites
with their bills : this seems to be their only method of defence
prior to flight, except running and hiding.
The downy plumage of the young when three days old is as
follows :
Under parts dusky white, running into gray on flanks and abdomen.
A distinct triangle of light cream white on the centre of belly between
breast and abdomen. Breast gray, throat and head cream gray with dis-
tinct tinges of buff. Back mottled light gray and dusky, getting more
buff on head. Wings : scapular space huffy, primary space gr.ny. The
gray is also darker on tertial space on wings. On back the down is dark
at the base, and grows lighter near the ends. The whole upper part ot
the bird is covered with dull black spots, irregular in shape. Bill horn
black with pink tip, three-sixteenths of an inch long. Feet dusky pink,
darker on edges and under portion.
The AOK. Vol. XX.
^Ta« ^1 I^UTCHER AND Baily, Habits of the Herring Gull. 4^3
The rapidity of growth of the chicks is very remarkable, and is
illustrated in the accompanying photograph (Plate XXII), show-
ing the comparative size of an t,^ and a chick sixty hours old.
On June 25, 1901, the young were hatching very rapidly; a
superficial census was taken of a portion of the east colony, and ten
nests with young were found. Capt. Stanley wrote under date of
July 26, 1 90 1, that " some of the young birds are flying over the
rocks with the help of their legs for a kick now and then." These
probably were those first hatched, which would indicate that they
begin to fly in from thirty to forty days.
At the time of the 1902 visit hundreds of young were present;
these, when iapproached, even from a great distance, all ran to
hiding places under the long grass, logs, or bark, behind rocks,
or wherever they could find a place to poke their heads out of
sight. They are very easy to find, as some part of the body is
generally in view. Sometimes four or five will be found under
one fallen log or decayed stump. The parents are on the wing
above as long as a person is in evidence, but on the intruder hid-
ing for a short time, they settle down, one at a time, upon their
favorite perches, on top of the trees or dead stumps, rocks, etc.,
and apparently after some vocal communication to their young, the
latter begin to back out of their hiding places and strut about,
picking at objects on the ground, and now and then chasing after
their parents, squeaking for something to eat.
Regarding the food of the young birds but little evidence can
be offered, but that is very direct and positive. Young birds on
two occasions, when being handled, vomited their stomach con-
tents, which were preserved in separate bottles with alcohol. Five
samples of stomach contents were obtained in all, which were sent
to the Biological Survey in Washington. Dr. Sylvester D. Judd,
of that Department, furnished a report of his examination, which
is as follows :
No. I. Lartts argentatus^ Duck Island, June 22, 1901. Contents:
Muscle, bones, scales, and digestive tract of a fish not more than 4 inches
long, 100%. Total amount, 100% animal matter.
No. 2. Larus argefitatns. Duck Island, June 23, 1901. Contents: 5
blow flies {Callipkora votnitotia)^ 25%; 3 moths, one of them a noctuid,
15%; I Anisodactylus (carabid), 5% ; i Leptura (cerambycid), 5OJ ; remains
of a small fish 50%. Total amount, 100% animal matter.
424 jyvTCHRK ksuBkii.^, Habits of the Herring GulL Foct!
No. 3. Larus argentatus^ Duck Island, June 25, 1901. Contents; 17
Callipkora vomitoria^ 40% ; i weevil, 1% ; i brown carabid beetle, 2% ; 2
Lachnosterna (May beetles), 7% ; remains of fish, 30% ; vegetable rubbish
20%. Total amount, 20% vegetable matter ; 80% animal matter.
No. 4. Larus argentatus, No-Man* s-Land, July 4, 1901. Contents : 2
funnels and a propodium of squids about 4 inches long. Total amount,
100% animal matter.
No. 5. Larus argeutatus, No-Man*s-Land, July 4, 1901. Contents:
Eye and epidermis of a very small squid, 25% ; prosternal process of
elaterid beetle, 20% ; tibia of a May beetle, 30% ; elytron of a carabid
beetle, 25%. Total amount, 100% animal matter.
In 1902 Mr. Bailey observed the parents disgorge food on the
ground which the young picked up and swallowed whole. The
larger young will often tackle a squid, apparently several times too
large for thera, and after several unsuccessful attempts will worry
it down, when the bird looks as though he were sorry and would
like to change his mind. In some instances the parents seemed
lo exhibit very little judgment as to the ability of their young, and
would leave a big, tough squid in the nest for a day old young
one to devour. Several such were watched picking and pulling
for some time without securing any nourishment. On visiting the
nest a half hour later it seemed that the parent had also been con-
vinced that her babies were not equal to the task and had removed
the squid.
The mortality among the young varies. In 1900 the island of
No Man's Land was visited at the height of the breeding season
when hundreds of young gulls of all sizes could be seen. Only a
very few dead ones were found and they were generally those not
more than three days old. In 1901 so few young were hatched
on Duck Island, at the date the observations were ended, that no
data could be obtained ; however, No-Man's-Land was visited July
4, 1 90 1, and it was found that from 60 to 70% of the eggs were
hatched and that hundreds of young birds were hiding everywhere.
A search for dead birds was made but very few were found. In
1902 Capt. Stanley reported that during the season about 200
young birds were killed by the adults, and nearly as many more
were killed by sheep stepping oft them, and others by being caught
under rocks and brush where they go to hide.
In the report of stomach contents, that of No. 5 was taken from
^^>w ^] DuTCHER AND Baily, Habits of the Herring Gull, 425
a bird that was found dead. It was examined very carefully for
wounds or any evidence of a violent death but none was found,
and the conclusion must obtain that it died from some natural
cause. The downy plumage of the bird was in such excellent
condition that it was preserved, and it was found while skinning
it that the body was very much emaciated, which would indicate
death by starvation, although a small amount of food still remained
in the stomach.
On Duck Island the remains of one young gull was found that
had met a violent death ; a small portion of the back, one foot, the
tarsus and tibia, the stomach and a little of the viscera remained,
the rest having been eaten. From the appearance of the
remaining portions it was judged that the bird had been killed by
a hawk, as it had been pulled apart ; it showed no marks whatever
of being chewed by a mammal. No hawks were seen on the
island, although Capt. Stantley states that members of the hawk
family often visit the island, especially during the migratory
season.
The Captain also stated that the crows on the island destroyed
some eggs, but he had never seen any evidence that they ever ate
young gulls. He also stated that he was sure there were no four-
footed enemies of the gulls, as he had made diligent search on the
island for mammals and could never find the slightest trace of
any. He had carefully looked for tracks in the snow many times
but always without success. The Captain also says that the old
birds sometimes kill the young. The adult seems then to exhibit
great anger and strikes the victim with its bill until it is dead. In
all probability the one killed is not its own offspring, for it seems
impossible that any bird that exhibits the solicitude for its eggs
and young that the Herring Gull does could become an infanticide.
In 1902 Mr. Baily saw an old bird actually striking the head of a
young bird about ten days old, while the helpless little fellow,
with quivering wings, implored the old one to stop. But with only
occasional pauses he continued the torture, just as a cat does
before eating a mouse. Then he would strike his victim in the
back pulling out its half-grown feathers. The blows came harder
and harder, and when the poor thing collapsed, the old bird
walked away a few feet and uttered the worst noise he was
426 DUTCHER AND Baily, HabUs of the Herring Guii.\ fort
capable of, but returned to finish his work at the sound of a last
weak cry. A few minutes later another old bird faced the mur-
derer, and they cursed one another for all they were worth, but no
attempt was made to strike. What the relation was between the
three parties could not be determined, nor could it be surmised
why the real parent, or some neighbor, did not interfere and pre-
vent the tragedy. However uncommon this occurrence, it was
not unique, for at least six dead birds were found in various
places, all of about the same age, which had been dealt with in a
similar manner, their heads, backs and wings being bruised and
blood-stained. Nothing deformed or unhealthy about these birds
was noted and no solution can be suggested, unless it be that the
young birds were lost and were put to death by old birds who
objected to being pestered for something to eat by other people's
children.
Great opportunities for the study of the habits of the adult
gulls were offered on Duck Island and some interesting facts
were observed ; among these was evidence that both the male
and female parents take part in the incubation of the eggs. On
one occasion, while photographing gulls on nests, it was noted
that the first bird that occupied the nest, after the camera was
focussed, had a number of dark feathers on its breast ; after it had
left the nest a bird with a pure white breast occupied it. That
this was a mated pair there is no reason for doubt, for they were
together, and both exhibited the greatest solicitude for the nest
and its contents. It was also observed that as the period of
incubation neared its end the anxiety of the parents increased in
a marked degree, so that it was easy to determine the stage of
incubation by the actions of the parents. During the last few
hours before the pipping or cracking of the egg the parent birds
were so fearless that they would leave the nest only on a near
approach, and while the camera was being focussed would remain
within a few yards, perched either on the ground or a low tree or
stump. Exposing the plate was always, made with a bulb at a
distance of forty to sixty feet, and before it could be reached one
of the parent birds w^as sitting on the nest again. In such a case
as this it was not necessary to cover the camera at all ; on the
other hand, if incubation had not advanced so far, it was neces-
^*j'- j^] DuTCiiER AND Baily, Iliibtts of the Herring Gull. 427
sary to cover the camera in the most skillful manner or else wait
for hours before the gull would return to the nest. On sunny
days during the hours of greatest heat, say from 12 to 3 p. m.,
the nesting gulls were not so anxious to remain on the eggs, nor
did the eggs cool enough to do them harm.
Mr. Baily, in 1902, built a blind of sticks, old ship trash, etc.,
about ten feet from a nest containing three eggs. While inside he
seemed to be entirely forgotten by the birds, for in less than five
minutes a bird alighted on top of the blind, which must have been
placed near its favorite perch. In about ten minutes the owner
of the nest was noted standing about thirty feet away, suspiciously
eyeing the hut, but before long she cautiously but proudly marched
to the nest. In her bill was a bunch of dry grass which she
deposited on the side of the nest, which was placed in the green
grass and clover against a small log. For several hours the nest
was watched and on two occasions of the seven when the bird
returned to the nest she turned the eggs slightly. They had pre-
viously all been marked with an arrow pointing in one direction,
and it was found she had only turned one of the pipped eggs.
She did not seem at any time to make any examination of the
eggs, but turned them with her bill after she had nestled down
into position. She always alighted some little distance from the
nest, and after looking about to see if the coast was clear, walked
rather deliberately to the nest, and carefully, tenderly sank into it,
moving her body from side to side about six times, as if to work
the feathers, between the eggs ; she then sat with her head erect,
turning it to the right or left every second or two, watching all
thdt was going on about her. Her mate was continually on guard
about fifteen feet away, sitting on a fallen log.
A high temperature seemed to have a marked effect on the
gulls, for it was noticed that they kept their mandibles open
and the tongue raised as if in distress for air. This was
obser\'ed both with the setting gulls and those that were perched
about on the trees and rocks. The calls and cries of the adult
were very varied and seemed to fit each occasion. On our enter-
ing one of the colonies, all the nearby birds would rise into the
air, each one screaming Kak kakkak at the top of its voice. As
the intruder advanced further into the colony the number of
428 DuTCHER AND Baily, Habits of the Herring Cull, Fq^
screaming birds increased until there was a very babel of sounds
and a whirling mass of birds in the air, flying in graceful evolu-
tions. As the observer advanced further into the colony, those
first disturbed gradually settled down and resumed their wonted
occupations of nesting or watching. If a pause was made to
examine or photograph a nest, and the observer bent low and
remained still, nearly all of the excited gulls immediately dropped
to the ground and resumed nesting or watching, and the colony
became as quiet as when there was no intruder in it, excepting, of
course, the very few birds that belonged to the immediate neighbor-
hood of the nest under examination. The light-keepers insist
that the gulls know all the regular residents of the island, some
ten in number, and do not exhibit as much fear or excitement
when they visit the colonies as when strangers do. They also
believe that the gulls soon become used to persons; in other
words, learn to recognize them, and consequently cease to fear
them. They certainly exhibit a very pleasing confidence in the
residents of the island, for nine nests were found in the light-
house reservation not many yards from the dwellings of the keep-
ers. The remarkable tameness of the gulls on Duck Island and
No-Man's-Land was one of the most pleasing features of the visits
to these colonies, and it can be accounted for only by attributing
it to the protection given to the gulls on these islands : they cer-
tainly recognize the fact that they are not molested, and exhibit a
charming confidence in man.
The breeding of these gulls in colonies shows the social side of
their nature, which is very strongly marked. Their nests are
placed very close together, in some instances, and quarreling
among the setting birds seems to be unknown.
The gulls all have their favorite perching places near the nests,
and if some other gull happens to alight upon it there is usually a
slight skirmish, but the intruder has no chance to maintain his
position. The perch is always upon such a small limb or point of
a dead stump that the slightest push or even a strong gust of
wind will cause a loss of balance, and a short flight has to be
taken before the position can be resumed. When the usurper
occupies such a perching place, the rightful owner has only to fly
behind him and give a push with his breast and the perch is
^*»9«?^] DuTCHER AND Baily, Habits of the Herring Gull. 429
vacated. There is rarely any resistance, this seeming to be the
lawful method of dispossessing an intruder. The quality of
bravery is not lacking in the character of the gulls, especially
when they have young ; they are theft extremely solicitous and do
not hesitate to make demonstrations of attack by assault. On one
occasion Mr. Dutcher, after photographing a nest, sat down on a
nearby stump to make some notes, not noticing that there was a
nest with some young birds at the back of the stump. This
action on his part seemed to excite the parents to an unusual
degree, for they made repeated swoops at the intruder, passing
within a short distance of his head each time. Gradually they
became more angry, until finally one of the gulls struck his head a
sharp blow with its wing.
The tameness and confidence in man displayed by the gulls on
Duck Island and No-Man 's-Land was not shown by the gulls on
any of the other islands visited ; this may be accounted for by the
fact that the protection given was not so complete, and also that
where the colonies are large the birds give each other courage ; in
other words, they appear to think "there is safety in numbers."
The gulls do not seem fo be disturbed by mammals to any
great degree. The sheep that feed on the islands sometimes
wander among the nests, but the setting birds make no further
demonstration than to rise on the nest and show a bold front to
the sheep, which always turn away. On one occasion a low rock,
almost awash, was seen on which some thirty or forty gulls were
standing, and among them were five or six harbor seals. The
rising tide reduced the surface of the rock rapidly, thus crowding
the occupants together, but the utmost harmony prevailed.
In 1902 Mr. Baily observed some sheep approaching a nest ;
the setting bird watched them with considerable anxiety, and occa-
sionally uttered a low chtuk, which grew louder as the half-dozen
sheep gradually and heedlessly neared the nest, nibbling the clover.
When within about three feet she opened her mouth and uttered a
strong protest, which caused the sheep to raise their heads in
slight alarm, and finally, at her wits end, she raised up on her feet
and invoked the aid of her attentive mate, who, screaming at the
top of his lungs, dashed into the faces of the unsuspecting intru-
ders and scattered them into a stampede up the slope. Not long
430 Ditcher and Daily, Habits of the Herring Gull. ^Oc^
after, one of them, blindly following his nose, wandered into the
same tracks, but when within a few feet of the nest his course was
altered after a slight protest from the occupant of the nest.
The sanitary habits of the gulls are excellent ; they are very
fond of bathing, resorting to the ocean where it is smooth, outside
the surf line. There numbers of them gather and rest on the
water, dipping their heads under, and throwing it over them in
showers. Then follows a period of dressing and preening the
feathers. Among the thousands of birds seen this season, not a
single individual was noted that showed the slightest stain on its
beautiful white plumage.
The mortality among the adult gulls on the breeding grounds
seems to be small. In 1901 only four dead ones were found;
one of these had evidently been shot at from some passing vessel
while off shore feeding and had strength enough left to fly to its
home to die. The other three had died from some accidental
cause. Capt. Stanley states that gulls are sometimes killed by
flying against sharp pointed stubs, thus receiving a fatal wound,
and on one occasion he had found the skeleton of one that had
been caught by its leg in the crotch of a limb and had starved to
death. In 1902 he reported 25 old birds killed, most of them
being accidentally caught on trees. At daylight large numbers of
gulls leave the island and go to sea for food ; and the length of
time they remain away is governed probably by the distance they
have to go to find fish. Some days they return quite early and on
others much later. The manner of flight when returning from one
of these food trips is entirely different from that of the ordinary
excursions made from the breeding grounds ; it is made close to
the surface of the water, very direct, one bird following another,
and is quite rapid. Sometimes the birds show marked evidences
of fatigue. Capt. Stanley states that the gulls are great gluttons
when food happens to be very plenty, for he has seen theni eat so
much that it was impossible for them to fly but a short distance.
They have the power of disgorging, both pellets and partially
digested food : many of the former, composed of fish bones and
scales, were found, and on more than one occasion the observers
just escaped a shower of half digested fish that was disgorged by
an overloaded or excited gull. They are very fond of codfish
Vol. XXl RiL^Y, Description of a ?icw Nightha-wk. 43 I
livers and can be tolled up with them very close to a boat. Should
a liver sink before it can be picked up by a gull while hovering,
the bird will settle on the water and disappear under the surface
in the effort to obtain the coveted tidbit.
The following special report was received from Capt. William
F. Stanley, September 23, 1902.
"The first flight of Herring Gulls, about 800, arrived at Great
Duck Island, March 12 ; their numbers steadily increased until
the 20th of May. The first ^%g was found May 15, and the first
completed set of three eggs on May 22. The last set of eggs
hatched August 3-5. Fifteen nests were marked and watched in
order to determine the time occupied in incubation, which proved
to be as follows : i in 24 days; 2 in 25 days ; 5 in 26 days ; 4 in
27 days; 3 in 28 days. Young birds were about five weeks old
when they began to fly. September 16 all the old birds left the
island, leaving the young birds to care for themselves."
A NEW SUBSPECIES OF NIGHTIIAWK FROM THE
BAHAMA tSLAXDS.^
BY J. H. RILEY.
The nighthawk of the Bahama Islands has generally been
recorded as ChonieUes minor, but while collecting birds, in con-
junction with Mr. S. H. Uerickson, on the Geographical Society
of Baltimore's Bahama Expedition, we managed to secure a small
series of these birds. A comparison of this material with a series
of ChonieUes virginianus minor from Cuba and the Isle of Pines,
and with Chordeiles virginianus chapmani from Florida, proves the
Bahaman bird to be a well-marked geographical race. As it is
apparently without a name it may be known as :
' Published here by permission of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institu-
tion.
432 Riley, Description of a New Nigh thaw k, focu
Chordeiles virginianus vicinus, subsp. nov.
Type^ No- 189689, U. S. National Museum, $ ad., Long Island, Bahamas,
July 16. 1903. Collected by J. H. Riley (Orig. No. 183).
Similar to Chordeiles virginianus chapmani hut smaller, with the cris-
sum and abdomen suffused with buff and the white patch on the primaries
smaller.
Measurements of type ; wing, 176.5 ; tail, 100.5 "*"*•
Female similar to the male but buff of abdomen and crissum deeper;
white of throat less pure and more restricted ; and the white terminal bar
on the tail nearly if not quite obsolete.
Distribution. — Nighthawks were either taken or seen on the following
islands by us : New Providence, Andros, Eleuthera, Watling^s, and Long
Island. They have also been recorded from Great Bahama, Abaco, For-
tune Island, Acklin Island, and Great Inagua, and are probably found
during the breeding season throughout the Bahama group of islands.
•
Remarks, — While in size the Bahaman Nighthawk is about
equal to C, v, minor^ in color it more nearly resembles C v, chap-
maniy but whereas the latter has the crissum and abdomen nearly
pure white barred with black in C, v. vicinus they are suffused
with buff. C, V. vicinus differs from C v. minor of Cuba in lack-
ing the tawny mottling above and the ochraceous-buff below, the
latter color being represented in vicinus by the buff wash on the
abdomen and crissum. In fact, the Bahaman bird is intermediate
in color between the form found in Cuba and tlie one in Florida,
with a leaning towards the latter.
Three males of C v. chapmani from Florida average: wing,
186; tail, 100.5 "^"^'
Four males of C. v, vicinus average : wing, 169 ; tail, 93.5 mm.
Six males of C. v, minor from Cuba and the Isle of Pines aver-
age: wing, 170; tail, 94.5 mm.
Habits, — These birds would come out early in the evening and
hawk about for insects in the same manner as C v, virginianus in
the North, but it seems to be more of a day flyer than that form,
as they could frequently be seen flying about in the heat of the
m id-day sun, in this respect reminding one of C. v. minor of Cuba.
The note resembles that of the latter bird also and it gets the
native name of pick-a-me-dick from its call g^ven while flying.
They are said not to be permanent residents on the islands, but
to come from the south in the latter part of April.
^f^^X-| General Notes, 433
Dr. Coker gave me an ^gg^ with incubation nearly complete,
found by flushing the parent off the nest, July 11, on Watling's
Island. He also showed me a nest on Long Island, July 17, con-
taining one young in the down on which the feathers had just
begun to grow. In both cases there was no nest other than a
slight hollow in the little sand that had collected in the cavities of
the rough coral rock of the beach.
The ^gg has a slight greenish-white ground color with larger
and smaller spots and blotches, which run together at the larger
end to form an indistinct wreath, of lighter and darker shades of
plumbeous. Over this there are small streaky spots of raw umber,
evenly distributed over the shell. It measures 23.4 x 12.5 mm.
In color it is exactly intermediate between eggs of C v, minor and
C V. chapmani.
GENERAL NOTES.
Sabine^s Gull at Monterey, California. — While carrying out a line o
work for the Field Columbian Museum, last April in the vicinitv of
Monterey, Cal., I came across a small bunch of Sabine*s Gull (AV//m
sahinii) in perfect spring plumage. They came into the Bay with hun-
dreds of Bonaparte Gulls and Red Phalaropes after a storm of a week^s
duration. — George F. Breninger, Phoenix^ Arizona.
The Snowy Plover in the Bahamas. — Mr. S. H. Derickson shot a spe-
cimen of yEffialitis ni'vosa on Long Island, Bahamas, Julj 16, 1903. It
was in the company of another of the same species, he tells me. This is
the first record of this species, I believe, for the Bahamas. The specimen
is now in the U. S. National Museum. — J. H. Riley, Waskingion^ D. C.
Richard80n*8 Owl (Nyciala tengmalmi rickardsoni) in Illinois. — In
recording the second capture of this owl for the State, I mentioned * that
another specimen had been reported, but that I was then unable to get
*Auk, Vol. XX, p. 305.
434 General Notes, \j^.
any definite information as to locality and date. Through the kindness
of Mr. Frederick C. Pierce of Chicago I am now enabled to record a
third specimen which was taken in Cicero, in December, 1902, and is
now in his possession. — Ruthven Deane, Chicago, III,
Capture of the Bam Owl {Strix pratincola) on Long Island, New
York. — This species is sufficiently rare on Long Island to make it worth
while to record a specimen shot February 17, 1903, at Montauk Point.
The bird was sent to me by Mr. Everett C. King, who wrote that it had
been seen flying about for two or three days after a hard snow storm.
He also stated that this bird and on6 shot two years ago are the only ones
of the kind he has seen in eleven years. — Jonathan Dwight, Jr., M. D.,
New York City,
The Second Known Specimen of Centurus nyeanua Ridgway. — On
landing at Cockburn Town, Watling's Island, Bahamas, July 11, 1903,
in company with Mr. S. H. Derickson, being very desirous of obtaining
reliable data as to the status of the above species {cf, Nye, Auk, XVI, July,
1899, 273), we struck out to find timber and arrived on the shores of the
first lake about a mile back of the port. This lake and the large lake con-
nected with it are surrounded with low hills, covered with a low growth
of trees, where they have not been cleared for sisal planting. While
standing talking with Mr. McDonald, the resident justice, concerning
woodpeckers and being told that he had never seen one there during a six
months* residence, we heard a note resembling the rolling call of the
Belted Kingfisher and supposed it was that bird. In a little while the
bird flashed across the road and lit in a rather thick clump of trees out of
sight. On going back to shoot the supposed kingfisher what was my
surprise to behold the very species I was looking for. It is now No.
1S9685, U. S. National Museum, $ ad. The specimen is in worn plum-
age and hardly comparable with the type. While the top of the head in
the type is a brilliant scarlet-vermilion, my specimen has faded out to an
orange-vermilion ; the feathers covering the nostrils in my specimen are
less extensively scarlet, and the lower parts so worn as not to be compar-
able. It measures: wing, 129; tail, 88; exposed culmen, 32 mm. We
were told that these woodpeckers, while not at all common, came down
from the hills during the winter and did considerable damage to the
oranges by making a small opening in the side of the fruit and extracting
the pulp. We were shown orange trees in which nearly all the ripe fruit
was thus destroyed, some of it still hanging on the trees. Although we
made special efforts to secure additional specimens, during our limited
stay, we did not hear or see anymore. — J. H. Riley, WasAirngton, D, C
Nighthawk Migration in New Hampahire. — One of the most interest-
ing regular migration movements that^has come under my notice I have
I
observed at Lake Pasquaney,_Bridgewater, N. H., for the past three years.
On August 25, 1900, Mr. G. M. Allen noted in the records of Camp Pas-
quaney twelve Nighthawks { CkordeiUs z>irginianu$')\ the most seen on any
date that summer. In 1901, on August 22 and 23, I recorded a large flock,
over twenty-five birds each day, passing at sundown slowly to the south-
west over the lake. On August 22, 1902, at dusk, a flock of fully three
hundred were seen migrating in the same direction. Again this year, on
August 22, 1903. in the forenoon, nearly a hundred birds were noted
passing over to the southwest. Thus for four years a definite migratory
movement of these birds in considerable numbers has been observed
between August 21 and 25. This migration has been noticed in Saco
Valley, and I take it the birds passing over Pasquaney are stragglers from
the Pemigewasset Valley migration, which occurs regularly. — Reginald
Hebbr Howe, Jr., Concord^ Mass.
Nests and Eggs of Ccsligena clemenciae. — About July 7, in the Hua-
chuca Mountains, Arizona, I discovered a Blue-throated Hummingbird
beginning its nest on a shelving rock on the face of a cliff. On the 13th
the first t^g was laid and on the 15th I took the set of two eggs, nest,
and female parent. A single small fern was the only vegetation growing
within ten or twelve feet of the nest. The rocks above the nest projected
well out from the nest, protecting it from the torrents of rain that falls at
that time of the year. The nest was composed chiefly of down from the
under side of sycamore leaves, some cocoons and green moss, all firmly
bound together with spider webs. The female when started from the
nest, instead of flying directly out from the nest and away, would fly
straight up the face of the cWft and pass through a rift in the wall. A
great fondness is shown by this species to associate itself with rugged
places.
This set of eggs, so far as known, is the third in existence. E. W.
Nelson speaks of a nest from which a single t%g was secured, built in a
shrub up on the side of the Vulcan de Tuluca, Mexico. Josiah H. Clark
(Auk, XVII, July, 1900, p. 294) tells us of a set of eggs taken by himself
in the state of Vera Cruz, Mexico. In * The Osprey ' for February, 1899,
I described a nest with two eggs I took on May 31, 1897, in these same
mountains, built in a clump of maiden-hair ferns growing from the side
of a wall of rock — the side of a deep gorge. The set of eggs taken this
year is now in the collections of the Field Columbian Museum. — George
F. Brbninger, Phoinix^ Arizona.
Mortality of Purple Martins {Progne purpurea) at Brattleboro, Vt —
During the long rain in June, 1903. the nests in the bird house belonging
to William C Horton of Brattleboro, Vt., became completiely watersoaked,
and thirty young and two adult Purple Martins were found dead in their
nests. The remaining members of the martin colony abandoned the
436
Geficral Notes. \^^
houRC, leaving twelve eggs unhatched. Occasionally a few return and
fiy about as if trying to catch a glimpse of the inside of their home but
none have ventured to enter up to this date (July 17). — Frances B.
HoRTON, Brattleboro, Vt.
Sand Swallows (Riparia rt'paria) Nesting in Sawdust. — In the sum-
mer of 1902, while I was in Franconia, N. H., Mrs. Annie Trumbull
Slosson pointed out to me a pile of sawdust, on the perpendicular face of
whichf earlier in the season, she had noticed what seemed to be entrances
to Sand Swallow nests. The pile is constantly being shovelled aw^ay,
and at the time of mv visit no holes were visible.
This year (1903) Mrs. Slosson wrote me, under date of June 18, that
she had been out to the place (on the Easton road) two days t)efore, and
seeing a hole in the vertical (newly dug down) side of the sawdust heap,
had taken pains to investigate the matter.
"We sat in the carriage," she wrote, and watched the hole, and soon
saw a swallow enter it and, immediately after, another. They came out,
flew away, and returned, entering the hole again. Each time they went
in little clouds of sawdust putfed out like smoke. I got out of the
carriage and went up the mound to the hole. I put my hand and arm in
as far as I could, but it was not far enough to reach eggs or young, and I
was afraid of the mound's coming down upon me. After I returned to
the carriage the birds came back, but were very shy of going into the
disturbed hole, making several starts, vibrating their wings, then flying
away. But in a few minutes they gained courage and again entered the
hole. I think there is not the slightest doubt that it is their home. I
could find no other hole, but have little question there were others which
had been wrecked by the workmen, who had been digging down that side
of the pile."
Some days later she wrote : "On Saturday we drove again by the saw-
dust heap. There were full twenty holes, and apparently all were occu-
pied ; swallows flying in and out all the time, a regular colony, just as
you see them in a sand-bank. Poor simple creatures, I fear an earth-
quake— or dustquake — has even now destroyed their work."
I begged her to make absolutely sure of the species, if she had not
already done so, though really there could be no reasonable doubt upon
that point, and on June 25 she replied: "Well, the species is all right.
I verified things yesterday. We went out to the mill, and I went up the
«teep, sliding mass to the holes, ' where the swallows dustward fly.'
About half a dozen of the holes had disappeared, but there were fourteen
left. The birds, came about me, and I easily identified them as Bank
Swallows, with white throat and a dark band across the breast."
Whether the breeding of Sand Martins in sawdust heaps has ever been
recorded I do not know, but the occurrence seems to me of considerable
interest, especially because the Sand Martin is the one member of its
^**i903f^] General Notes, 437
family, as seen in eastern North America, that I had supposed never to
have altered its manner of life as a result of what we call civilization. —
Bradford Torrey, Wellesley HiliSy Afass,
An Interesting Solitary Vireo (Vireo solitarius). — On April 28, 1903, a
male Solitary Vireo appeared in our garden ; this, although situated in a
thickly settled part of Cambridge, more than a mile from the nearest
woods, covers upwards of an acre of ground and contains, in addition to
much dense shrubbery, a number of well-grown trees of various kinds,
including a few pines, spruces and hemlocks. The bird evidently found
the place to his liking, for he remained there during the whole of the
following three months, spending most of his time in the garden but
also ranging through the cultivated grounds which surround the houses
of our nearer neighbors. So far as we could ascertain he had no mate*
although it is possible that he built a nest, for on one occasion late in
June he was seen tearing strips of loose bark from a birch and takings
them into the trees on the opposite side of the street.
That so notorious a forest lover as the Solitary Vireo should ever
choose for his summer home a city garden, however wild and primitive,
is sufficiently remarkable, but a still more interesting characteristic of
this particular bird was that he had two perfectly distinct songs, one
typically that of his own species, the other absolutely indistinguishable
from that of the Yellow-throated Vireo. These, although used with
about equal frequency, were never confused or intermingled. He would
sing one for minutes at a time and then take up the other for a longer or
shorter period. Not once when I was listening to him did he interpolate
any of the notes of either strain among those of the other, nor ever
change from one to the other save after a well marked interval of silence-
To the ear of the listener, in short, he was either a Solitary or a Yellow-
throat, as the mood happened to serve, but never both in the same breath.
When rendering his own legitimate theme this bird was as typical and
fine a singer as any Solitary that I have ever heard. Indeed, he appeared
gifted to a really exceptional degree with the wild, ringing quality of voice,
the generous repertory of varied, exquisitely modulated notes, and the
(at times) rapid, ecstatic delivery which combine to make the song of the
Solitary so delightful to all discriminating lovers of bird music. But
when, on the other hand, he chose to play the r61e of his yellow-throated
cousin he reproduced with equal fidelity and success the latter's character-
istically slow, measured delivery and rich contralto voice. So perfect,
indeed, was the imitation that when, as repeatedly happened, I had
opportunity for directly comparing it with the song of a true Yellow-
throated Vireo that also frequented the garden, I was unable to detect anjr
differences whatever in the notes of the two birds.
It may be well to add in this connection that Mr. Walter Faxon has
heard one Yellow-throated Vireo (in Waltham, Massachusetts) and I
another (in Lancaster, Massachusetts) which sang almost exactly like a
438
General Notes, [^
Solitary Vireo; in both of these instances, however, the bird, unlike the
Solitary above mentioned, appeared to use only the song which it had
borrowed from its near relative and to have either lost or never acquired
thai of its own species. — William Brewster, Cambridge, Mass.
Bell's Vireo ( Vireo bellii) in Colorado. — It may be of interest to record
that the writer shot a male Bell's Vireo, June 12, 1903, on Clear Creek,
near Denver, Colorado. In his second appendix to the 'Birds of Col-
orado,' Prof. W. W. Cooke intimates the future discovery of the species
in the State, and so far as I know this is the first taken in Colorado. The
bird was first discovered by hearing its unfamiliar song, but I feel quite
certain I have heard the same song in the city, on one or two occasions
in previous years. The specimen is now in the collection of the State
Historical and Natural History Society, Denver, Colo. — Horace G.
Smith, Asst. Curator, State Historical and Natural History Society ^ Den-
ver, Colorado,
Nest and Eggs of the Swainson'a Warbler {Helinaia swainsonii). —
June I St and 8th were ' red-letter* days for me from an oOlogical stand-
point. Jumping on my wheel and riding two or three miles from this
city, I came to a swamp I had never visited before ; and while looking
carefully among the thick cane-brake, I heard ckips of a warbler. Birds
were singing and darting all around, and the * swamp-flies ' were making
my life miserable, when I perceived a bunch of cane-leaves near the top
of a cane-bush seven feet above the ground. On going closer, I saw a
warbler on the nest, which immediately flushed and feigned lameness,
rolling and chirping on the ground among the cane. I at once recog-
nized the bird as Swainson's Warbler, and on peering into the nest saw,
to my great delight, three white, unmarked eggs of a slightly pinkish hue
and rather globular in shape. The nest was a typical warbler's, being
made of leaves of the elm, cane in layers, pine needles, and lined with
fine rootlets and grasses. I at once packed the eggs with the enthusiasm
of having found such a rare nest — the rarest eggs I have ever found in
this locality. Having read that this specie of warbler nests in small
colonies, I continued in the cane, stooping often to search the tops of
the cane. I had not gone ten feet, when I came to another nest with
a warbler on it, in a canebush situated five feet above the ground. The
bird dropped and fluttered off. The nest was more compactly built and
contained three fresh eggs, somewhat smaller than the eggs of the other
set. Proceeding near the end of the cane-brake, I saw a warbler dart out
from a clump of cane, and on investigating, I saw a neat little Hooded
Warbler's ( Wihonia mitraia) nest with three creamy white eggs marked
with specks and spots of chestnut and lilac gray wreaths. I found one
uncompleted Swainson's Warbler's nest, and on visiting the same swamp
again in a week, I located two more sets of three eggs each of this
^°wT General Notes, 439
warbler — the rarest of southern warblers. — Dr. M. T. Cleckley,
Augusta^ Ga,
Springfield, Mass., Bird Notes. — Branta bernicla. On the nth of
April last a Brant was taken on the river near Northampton ; this bird is
rarely observed in this part of the Connecticut Valley.
Aquila chrysa0tos. In November, 1902, a Golden Eagle was captured
alive in a steel trap at Belchertown bv Edgar E. Mead ; the bird is now in
captivity in the city park in Springfield. There is no other record of the
appearance of an individual of this species near here for more than
twenty-five years, and there are only three instances recorded previous to
that time.
Lanius ludovicianus migrans. A Migrant Shrike was taken at Long-
meadow Dec. 19, 1 90 1.
Podilymbus podiceps. In this section of the country the Pied-billed
Grebe has been a rare breeder, usually locating its nest in remote places
away from the habitations of man. In the spring of this year, a pair
chose as their home a small pond in the suburbs of Springfield near a
number of houses, and at a place which was a rendezvous for boys, and
there nested and succeeded in raising two young.
Branta canadensis. For more than ten years Canada Geese have been
successfully bred in the public park, in Springfield, and until last year,
one of the wings of each of the young has been cut to prevent their
flying, but last autumn about twenty-five individuals of those raised
during 1902 were left uncut. In the early spring of this year these birds
became very noisy and uneasy and beginning with short flights soon
would go off for many hours. Several are known to have been killed,
and others disappeared, probably joining migrating flocks. Although the
path to the regular breeding grounds of its kind, to the north, was free
for it to follow, one preferred to return to the park and there mated with
one of those with a crippled wing, and the pair successfully raised a
brood of young. — Robert O. Morris, Springfield^ Mass.
Some New Records for Nova Scotia. — Among a small lot of bird skint
sent to me from Sable Island, Nova Scotia, by Mr. Jas. McL. Boutcher,
I find no less than five species that are new to the Province and two
others whose presence is purely accidental although previously recorded.
Almost without exception the birds are young of the year, which goes to
prove that young birds are most frequently lost, and as all of them were
captured in the fall, it is extremely probable that they were carried along
far out of their bearings by autumnal storms. It is well established that
most accidental visitors in the East are taken in the fait, and the move-
ment of storm centres in a northeasterly track east of the Mississippi
undoubtedly has a close bearing upon such captures.
Geothlypis formosa. Kentucky Warbler. — A young male taken
44 O General Notes, [o^
September i, 1902, is in first winter plumage as determined by softening
the skin and examining tiie bones. Tlie nearest point at which the species
regularly breeds is New Jersey.
Chondestes grammacus. Lark Sparrow. — A young male taken
September 4, 1902. This bird, still showing remains of the juvenal plum-
age, had wandered at least a thousand miles from where it was probably
hatched in the Mississippi Valley.
Spiza americana. Dickcissel. — A young male in first winter plum-
age taken September 13, 1902. Another wanderer from the Mississippi
Valley, perhaps.
Hydrochelidon nigra surinamensis. Black Terx. — A young male
in juvenal plumage taken September 9, 1902. This species has been so
often recorded along the New England coast that its occurrence at Sable
Island is not unexpected.
Micropalama himantopus. Stilt Sandpiper. — An adult female,
secured August 18, 1902, seems to establish a first record for Nova Scotia.
Icterus galbula. Baltimore Oriole. — A young male in first winter
plumage, taken October 4, 1902, is the second only that has been recorded
(see Auk, IV, 1887, p. 256, for earlier record) and Mr. Boutcher comments
that it "came during a heavy gale."
Mimus polyglottoB. Mockingbird. — A young male in juvenal plum-
age was captured September 3, 1902, "hopping about a woodpile." It is
the second from Sable Island (see Auk, XIII, 1896, p. 344) in this plumage.
— Jonathan D wight, Jr., M. D., New Tork City.
Formalin Fails as an Insecticide for Dermestes. — Wishing to test the
efficacy of this chemical which has been advocated as a protection against
• moths,' I placed five larvae of Dermestes and a couple of teaspoonfuls of
Schering's formalin in a new nearly air-tight * Cambridge bird-can'
leaving it closed for twenty-four hours. On opening the can I found
the formalin had not entirely evaporated while the larvae were unharmed.
They had run about freely in the can and quickly revived in the fresh air.
Even a bath in the liquid produced no permanent ill-effects, so the next day
they and five more of their brethren were again placed in the can and a
teaspoonful of carbon disulphide poured in. When the can was opened at
the end of only ten hours, the larvae lay dead in the little tray in which
they had been placed. Although extremely offensive to the nose and
dangerous because volatile and inflammable, there is no surer insecticide
than the disulphide. It is penetrating and destroys life even in the eggs
of * moths ' of all kinds, and its bad odor is otfset by its rapid evaporation.
Formalin is constantly irritating to nose and eyes and if, as I have shown,
it fails to promptly destroy one of the n.aturalist's greatest enemies its
use even as an insectifuge is not to be encouraged. — Jonathan Dwight,
Jr., M. D., New York City.
^^^loo^'"^] Recent Literature. 44 J
RECENT LITERATURE.
Macoun*8 ' Catalogue of Canadian Birds/ Part II. — The first part of
this import<int work appeared in 1900, and its general character and scope
were so fully indicated in this journal (Vol. XVII, Oct., 1900, pp. 394, 395)1
that it remains now o\\\y to chronicle the appearance and extent of Part
11,^ which includes the Raptores, and the succeeding families of the A.
O. U. Check-List to and including the Icteridie. As in Part I, we have a
compendium of the previously published information regarding the range
and breeding areas of the species known to occur in North America north
of the United States, supplemented by a large amount of hitherto unpub-
lished material gathered bj the members of the Canadian Geological Sur-
vey, and contributions from a large number of trustworthy correspondents.
The authority is given for each record, whether published or unpublished,
thus explicitly designating the sources of the information here presented,
In the case of published records, the place of publication is often, but not
always, explicitly stated. The * Catalogue ' also includes a list of the
specimens in the Government Museum at Ottawa, with full data as to
their place and date of capture, etc.
It is announced that Part III, completing the work, is ready for the
press, and that it will be published during the coming winter. It will
include such information relating to species mentioned in Parts I and II
as may have been received since their publication, as well as an index to
the three parts, and a complete bibliography of the authorities consulted
in the preparation of the work. The * Catalogue ' will thus be a work of
great permanent value, and a most important contribution to our knowl-
edge of the distribution of North American birds. — J. A. A.
Dresser's ^ A Manual of Palaearctic Birds. ^ ' — In a work of some 950
pages Mr. Dresser manages to treat the 1219 species and subspecies of the
* Geological Survey of Canada. | Robert Bell, M. D., Sc. D., (Cantab.),
LL. D., F. R. S. I — I Catalogue | of | Canadian Birds. | — | Part II. |
Birds of Prey, Woodpeckers, Fly-catchers, | Crows, Jays and Blackbirds. |
Including the following orders : | Raptores, Coccyges, Pici, Macrochires, and
Part I of the Passeres, | — | By | John Macoun, M. A., F. R. S. C, | Natural-
ist to the Geological Survey of Canada. | [Vignette.] Ottawa: | Printed by
S. £. Dawson, Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty, | 1903. — 8vo,
pp. i-iv, -|- il., pp. 219-413. Price, 10 cents.
» A Manual of | Palaearctic Birds | By H. E. Dresser, F. L. S., F. Z. S.,
etc I Author of "The Birds of Europe *' | [Vignette] London | Publbhed by
the Author at 3 Hanover Square, W. — 8vo, Part i, 1902, pp. 1-498, and fron-
tispiece; Part II, 1903, pp. i-vii, 499-922, 811. unpaged, and frontispiece.
Price, 25 s. net ; thin paper copies, 30 s. net.
J J. 2 Recent Literature, foS'
Paluearctic ornis, as here recognized. As stated in the preface, the work
is "primarily intended for the use of field-naturalists and travellers."
With their convenience in mind, the technicalities, including synonymy
and references, have been reduced to small compass, and binomials are
employed throughout, even for the forms included as "subspecies." All
forms "described under trinomials" have been uniformly excluded as
not entitled to any kind of recognition, for the reasons, first, that the
author is "in principle a binomialist," and, second, because their recog-
nition is difficult for even experts, and their admission "seems calculated
rather to puzzle and discourage than to assist the beginner." For this
and other reasons the 'Manual ' can hardly be considered as a technical
treatise, but as a popular handbook for the identification of the species and
the more prominent "subspecies." The nomenclature is orthodox from
the standpoint of ultra conservatism, through the non-recognition of
Linna^an names proposed prior to 1766, in the rejection of specific names
that have l)een adopted for genera, and in the use of emended forms of
names instead of the original. To save space in the bibliographical cita-
tions, apparently, the name adopted in the text heads the list of refer-
ences, regardless of whether the generic element of the name was used for
the species by the authors cited or not; but when not so used the name
of the author is enclosed in parenthesis, though there appears to be no
explanation to this eftect. It also seems a little strange to find a species
ranged as a subspecies of some other species described many years later,
as in the case of Cinclus aquaticus^ with parallel cases elsewhere.
In the treatment of the species the English name is given first, then the
systematic name, followed by references to the principal works treating
of the species (or subspecies, as the case may be) ; then are given its
vernacular names in the various countries it inhabits, followed by a short
description (generally sufficient, apparently, for identification), a brief
statement of its range, and a paragraph or two regarding its habit8,
including some account of the nest and eggs, the whole occupying about
a page. Subspecies arc formally distinguished as such by the prefix
"subsp." and by use of ditterent type for the name ; they are usually dis-
posed of, very properly, in a few lines, by comparison with the species
to which they are most allied. The species follow each other in the
systematic order of the same author's * Birds of Europe,' but there are
no divisions higher than genera to indicate the limits of families and
orders — a feature that might well have been supplied in the interest of
the non-scientific reader. The work, however, cannot fail to be of the
greatest service to tlie class of users for which it is avowedly prepared,
and also a handy reference book for ornithologists. Indeed, the author
is entitled to great credit for having placed before the public such a con-
cise and excellent manual of the birds of so vast an area as the Palaearctic
Region. — J. A. A.
^*^lw^ ] Recent Literature. 443
Huntington's * Our Feathered Game.' ^ — In a single volume ot about
400 pagCv*; Mr. Huntington treats of all of the species of North American
birds commonly hunted as game, among which are included the Bobolink
and Mourning Dove, but not the Robin nor the Meadowlark. Of the
former he says : " I have placed the Bobolink at the end of my list, a
place most convenient to strike it off, and I hope before long the hand-
some song-bird of the meadows will not be an object of pursuit." In
respect to the Mourning Dove he is less lenient, and although he mentions
the States which have prohibited its shooting, he decidedly favors its con-
tinued treatment as a game bird.
This book is written by a sportsman, for sportsmen, and from the
sportsman^s point of view, and should prove welcome to such as care for
a * manual ' of North American game birds in a single volume. The first
chapter is introductory, treating of the changed conditions as regards the
present scarcity 'of game birds, methods of hunting, stringent game laws,
etc., in comparison with twenty-five years ago, when feathered game was
abundant and the hunter could shoot whenever and wherever he pleased,
with no limit to the bag. While the author manifests regret at the pass-
ing of these *good old times,* he recognizes the necessity for stringent
game protection. Chapters follow on 'Guns and Dogs,* and • Game
Clubs, Parks, and Preserves.* The rest of the book is divided into four
sections and an appendix, treating respectively of (i) Gallinaceous Birds;
(2) Wild- Fowl, or Swimmers; (3) Shore Birds or Waders; (4) Cranes,
Rails, and Reed Birds, Wild Pigeons and Doves ; (5) Appendix, giving
brief descriptions of the species. The purpose and character of the book
is well expressed in the author*8 closing paragraph of the introduction :
"My observation of the birds is from the sportsman^s blind, or as he sees
them in a tramp across the field, with dog and gun ; a sufficient descrip-
tion, however, being given in the notes at the end of the volume to
enable the reader to identify the species. We do not go to the museums
to compare skins with the naturalists in the hope of creating a subspecies,
but to the fields to shoot over those still open, as well as on club-grounds
and private preserves, making some inquiry by the way as to the natural
history of our game, and the new methods of preser\'ation and propaga-
tion." The eight full-page colored plates of shooting scenes are in the
style of this author^s well-known illustrations published in his *In
Brush, Sedge, and Stubble' (folio, 1899,) since republished as * The
True Game Birds,* while the 135 full-length * bird portraits* are arranged
In 29 half-tone plates at the end of the volume. — J. A. A.
' Our Feathered Game | A Handbook of the | North American Game
Birds I By | Dwight W. Huntington | With eight full-page shooting scenes in
color I and one hundred and thirty-five bird portraits | Charles Scribner*s
Sons I New York, 1903 — Crown 8 vo, pp. xii 4-396, 8 col. pll., 29 half-tone
pll. Price, $2.00 ; postage, 15 cts.
444 Recent Literature, [^
Degen on the *^ Perennial Moult" in the Australian Piping Crow. —
As shown bv the title,* Mr. Degen's memoir is not merely an account of
the moult in one of the species of Australian Piping Crows, but an
attempt to throw light upon "the archseornithic type from which the
wing of the modern bird has been evolved. The main object of the
paper is stated to be " to give additional evidence in support of the theory
of the derivation of the feathering of the bird's wing." If was therefore
found "necessary to ascertain the mode by which the perennial moult
of the individuals of a species of bird is made up from the earliest to the
last stages of renewal ; and, further, to what extent each feather partici-
pates in this annual process during the period of complete feather-
change." The species chosen for this investigation is the Gymnorkina
tibicen, in which the moulting of the flight-feathers is traced from the
beginning to the completion of the moult. The various stages, from the
dropping of the first remex to the completed growth of the one last
moulted, are described in detail and very clearly illustrated by numerous
diagrams. Not only is the moult in this species traced in the most
minute detail, but the history and previous literature of the general
subject of ecdysis is considered, mo%i\y passim^ and the recent papers by
Mr. Witmer* ^one and Dr. J. Dwight are frequently cited, as well a8
those of earlier writers. Beyond the minutely detailed record of the con-
ditions of feather-change in the Piping Crow, there is little that is new to
the general subject, but a confirmation of the conclusion reached by others
as to the order of shedding and replacement of the flight-feathers. The
two distinctly different principles of shedding and renewal are, first, " the
regular sequence of their renewal on the hand-portion from within out-
wards, though accelerated in certain places or retarded in others, in
order to maintain the requisite balance for flight, by a system of approxi-
mate symmetry for the whole wing during this critical change. This is
the principle which forms the rule for probably the entire order of the
Passeres," but not for some of the Picariae and many of the lower forms
of birds. In the case of the cubital quills the moult begins with the
first outer remex and proceeds inward to the fourth, but in the next
series of three the order of moult is reversed, beginning with the seventh
remex, then the sixth, and then the fifth.
"The renewal of the wing-coverts presents some notable deviations from
that of the flight-feathers." While the latter assume their permanent
order of renewal in the first moult, the wing-coverts pass through transi-
tional stages before attaining their permanent order of renewal. A
^ Ecdysis, as Morphological Evidence of the Original Tetradactyle Feather-
ing of the Bird's Fore-limb, based on the Perennial Moult in Gymnorhina
tibicen. By Edward Degen, F. Z. S. Trans. Zool. Soc. London, Vol. XVI,
Part viii, pp. 347-412, pll. xxxvi-xxxviii. May, 1903.
^ Erroneously spelled " Wi timer" throughout the memoir.
Vol. XX
1903
J Recent Literature, 44 S
"marked transverse or vertical element" is found to enter into the con-
ditionft, and "this transverse arrangement is a survival, therefore,"
according to the author, "of the phylogenetic afl^nities which link the
present Class Aves to their Saurian ancestrv." The great importance of
the wing-coverts in "helping to clear up outstanding questions connected
with the evolution of the organ of flight" has been fully reorganized by
Pycraft and Goodchild whose conclusions are here cited.
Under the head of * Conclusions * is a long discussion of the evolution
of the wing of the modern bird, with regard to the original point of origin
of the flight-feathers. His final conclusions are expressed in the fol-
lowing
Revised Scheme for the Derivaton of the Flight-feathers
FROM the TeTRADACTYLE ANCESTRAL FoRM OF BiRDS.
Proto-metacarpo-digitals = Hypo-raetacarpo-digiuls =
Flight feathers of Phalangeal Origin. Flight feathen of Metacarpal Origin.
Digit I.
Suppressed (lost). Present Pc^nac pollicis I V-I .
Digit II.
Present Metacarpo-digitals XI-VI. Present intercalary row I-VI.
Digit III.
Present MeUcarpo-digitols V-I. Present Cubitol Group II, Secondary Remiges (o) I-IV.
Digit IV.
Present Cubital Group III, Secon- Present CubiUl Group I, Secondary Remiges
dary Remiges V-VII. VIII-X.— Cubiti veri XI-x.
Direction 0/ Moult.
' (Left Wing.)
"From the foregoing scheme it may be observed that there are no
flight-feather equivalents allotted to the phalangeal portion of Digit I, in
which part they figure as • suppressed * This tendency towards a part-
suppression, if carried further, would have the effect of leading to total
apoptilism. It, moreover, must have proceeded contemporaneously with
the feathering of the forearm and was still in progress after, as is evi-
denced in the Passeres, where it has reached the present climax in the
Oscines proper.
"Considering the genealogical relative shortness of Digit I, coupled
with the fact of a still greater reduction of size in the present forms of
birds to one compound clement, there is strong probability existing that,
during the course of the fusion of the phalangeal segments of this digit
with its originally independent metacarpal bone, they were stripped off
446 Recetti Literature, [^
one after the other as in the case of the *remicle* and other diminutive
coverts. . . ."
As to the question of * diastataxy/ the author believes that the present
inquiry *■*' supplies proof that *■ faulting ^ is not confined alone to diastataxtc
wings, but takes place, though in inferior degree, in the short-armed
eutaxic forms of birds, such as the Passeres." — J. A. A.
Weed's Bibliography of Economic Ornithology. — As the title states,
this is only a "partial bibliography" of the subject to which it relates,'
but as such it is disappointing as well in what it contains. Beginning
with Wilson, 1808-14, we have listed a miscellaneous assortment cf
general works, as those of Bonaparte, Audubon, Nuttall, etc., and of
special papers dealing often in only a slight or incidental way with the
food habits of birds, while a number of * reports* and papers treating
especially of such matters are omitted. While a large part of the titles
cited are more or less pertinent, we find no reference to several of the
most important papers and reports that treat especially of the economic
.relations of Birds. In preparing the bibliography of such a subject, it is
difficult to properly adjust the line of exclusion, but the omission of
some of the most important titles seems to imply lack of care in compila-
tion.— J. A. A.
Howe and Sturtevanfs Revised List of the Birds of Rhode Island.' —
This brochure of 24 pages "endeavors to bring up to date the present
knowledge of Rhode Island avifauna, and to correct that work [the
original list, published in 1899] both in misstatements and typographi-
cal errors." * Part I,' of two pages, contains a note by Mr. James M.
South wick on the collection of Rhode Island birds presented to the
Museum of Natural History at Roger Williams Park, Providence, by the
late Charles H. Smith, which is stated to contain 292 species, repre-
sented by 480 specimens. Then follows * Part II,* a * Revised Annotated
List of the Birds of Rhode Island,' numbering 283 species, besides 3
entered as "extirpated," and 8 as hypothetical. Several species of the
original list are * dropped*, and five are now added. Mc Howe need-
lessly proposes (p. 22, footnote) the new generic name Paulomagns for
the House Wren ! — J. A. A.
* A Partial Bibliography of the Economic Relations of North American
Birds. By Clarence M. Weed. New Hampshire College Agricultural
Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin No. 5. Durham, N. H., 1902. 8vo,
PP- 139-179-
'A Supplement to the Birds of Rhode Island. By Reginald Heber
Howe, Junior, and Edward Sturtevant. 8vo, pp. 24. Middletown, Rhode
Island, 1903.
^°9o?^] Receut Literature. 447
Stone on Birds of Southern New Mexico and Western Texas. —
Messrs. Stone and Rehn have recently published a paper on the Terres-
trial Vertebrates of portions of sonthern New Mexico and western Texas,
Mr. Stone being responsible for the portions relating to the birds and
reptiles and Mr. Rehn for that on the mammals,^ based on collections
made bj Mr. Rehn and Mr. H. L. Viereck in the spring and early sum-
mer of 1902, in El Paso County, Texas, and Otero County, New Mexico,
with some material from other sources. The list of birds numbers 41
species, of which 31 rest on specimens taken, and the other ten on field
identifications of birds seen but not taken. The list is briefly annotated
with the collector's field notes, and in some instances by remarks on the
character or condition of the plumage. The range of Spizella atrigular'is
is extended considerably to the eastward of its former known distribution
by the capture of a specimen in Dry Cafton, Otero Co., New Mexico.
The faunal relation of the localities visited in New Mexico ^' appears to
be truly Lower Sonoran." This fauna seems to extend up the bottoms of
the caftons, "while the slopes of the same and the foothills appear to pos-
sess more distinctly Upper Sonoran types." An arm of the Lower Son-
oran appears to extend ^*off from the Rio Grande tract and runs up
between the Organ and the Sacramento ranges, comprising the San
Augustine plain." — J. A. A.
Oberholser on New Birds from Texas. — A vireo of the bellii type,
intermediate between Vireo bellii bellii and V. bellii pusillus has been
described * by Mr. Oberholser as Vireo bellii medius^ from southwestern
Texas and immediately adjacent portions of Mexico. He has also
described^ a new Cliff Swallow from the same region, under the name
Petrockelidon lunifroms tackina.
He has also shown * that the name Hylopkilu\^ heretofore in current use
for a large group of Central American and South American vireos, is
preoccupied by Hylopkila for a genus of insects, so that the proper generic
name for the vireo group is Packysylvia Bonaparte, 1850. — J. A» A.
Bonhote*s List of Birds collected in the Bahamas.* — Mr. Bonhote made
an ornithological collecting trip to the Bahamas in the winter of 1901-
> On the Terrestrial Vertebrates of Portions of Southern New Mexico and
Western Texas. By Witmer Stone and James A. G. Rehn. Proc Acad. Nat.
ScL Phila., 1903, pp. 16-34. May 7, 1903.
'Description of a New Vireo. By Harry C. Oberholser. Proc. Biol. Soc.
Washington, Vol, XVI, pp. 17, 18, Feb. 21, 1903.
'A new Cliff Swallow from Texas. Ibid.^ pp. 15, 16, Feb. 21, 1903.
*/fcV/., p. loi, June 23, 1903.
* On a Collection of Birds from the Northern Islands of the Bahama Group.
By J. Lewis Bonhote, M. A,, F. Z. S. The Ibis, July, 1903, pp. 273-312.
448 Recent Literature. \^.
'oi, which has furnished the basis for two papers, the first, entitled * Field
Notes on some Bahama Birds/ published recently in the ' Avicultural
Magazine ' (see Auk, antea, pp. 230, 231), and the second, htre under notice,
giving a formal list of the 104 species collected and notes on a few others
observed but not taken.
A list of the specimens secured of each species is given, with the date
and locality of capture, with, in some cases, quite extended notes on their
habits and history as Bahama birds. There is some critical comment on
a number of the species, particularly of the genus Geotklypsis^ but his
remarks are not especially convincing to those who have reached opposite
conclusions through better facilities for investigation. He claims to
have added four species to the Bahama list, but one of them {Nycticorax
ntgvius) was long since recorded by the late Dr. Northrop in an important
paper on *The Birds of Andros Island,* Bahamas * (Auk, VIII, i89i,pp.
64-80), which Mr. Bonhote appears to have overlooked, as it is not cited
in his references to previous authors. The paper contains much new and
interesting information respecting the birds of the Bahamas and is thus
a most welcome contribution to the subject. — J. A. A.
Sherbom's ^ Index Animalium.* * — Some ten or more years ago Mr.
Sherborn entered upon the almost overwhelming task of compiling a list
of the genera and species of animals, both living and extinct. An under*
taking of such magnitqde and importance quickly attracted the attention
of prominent naturalists in England, and liberal support was received
from the British Association, under whose auspices chiefly the work has
been continued. The British Museum and other libraries, appreciating
the exhaustive bibliographical researches involved, profited by Mr. Sher-
born's knowledge of books in adding to their shelves many of the works
not previously accessible in England. Through the intelligent coopera-
tion of these libraries Mr. Sherborn has been enabled to consult practi-
cally all of the zoological literature from 1758 to 1800, his * libri
dcsideratr consisting mainly of unimportant works.
In view of the long time required to bring the list up to date, it was
thought well to place a portion of it in the hands of zoologists without
delay, and to this end the part dealing with names published from 1758
to the close of the eighteenth century was issued late in 1902. This
installment comprises a thick volume of over 1200 pages, containing
nearly 60,000 entries, of which about one twelfth relate to birds.
^ Index Animalium | sive | Index nominum quae ab A. D. MDCCLVIII |
Generibus et Speciebus Animalium | imposita sunt | Societatibus eruditorum
adiuvantibus | a | Carole Davies Sherborn | confectus | sectio prima | a kalen-
dis ianuariis, MDCCLVIII | usque ad finem Decembris, MDCCC | Canta-
brigiae | E Typographio Academico | MDCCCCII — Roy. 8vo, pp. i-lix; i-
1195. Price 25 s, net.
^^Iw^] Recent Literature. 449
The general plan of the work is excellent, the arrangement of names
being alphabetical throughout, with the genera distinguished from
species by means of capital initials. At the end of the main list the
species are again grouped alphabetically under genera, where one may
find at once all of the specific names used in combination with each genus.
Thus, under Psittacus^ we find 265 specific names ; under Falco, 220, etc.
In the general list specific names are given as originally spelled, without
emendation or correction, followed by their respective generic terms,
together with a correct citation, with date of publication, of the work in
which they first appeared. Where a specific name is not new, but used
for the first time in combination with another generic name, this fact is
indicated by citing the original genus at the end of the reference.
Preceding the general list is a bibliography, wherein are briefly listed
the titles of 1300 or more works handled by Mr. Sherborn in the prepara-
tion of the present volume, with important notes (too short, in most
cases I ) indicating the character of each work, whether binomial, or other-
wise, etc.
Referring to the short list of * libri desiderati,' we may dismiss two of
those mentioned by saying that Wagner, *■ Abbild. Nat. Kab. Bayreuth,^
is not binomial,^ and no systematic names occur in the *Nieuwe Maga-
zijn.
In a work such as the present it is quite natural that there should be
some omissions and occasional errors. These are, fortunately, as far as
they pertain to birds, of no great moment, as the names omitted are
more or less commonly cited in ornithological literature.' Some names
are, through oversight, stated to be nomina nuda when they are not so.
The genera of mammals named by Link [e, g.y Ondatra^ Ockotona^ Petau-
rtsta)y in his * Beytrage * are thus indicated, but they arc properly diag-
nosed on pp. 74-78, where typical species are also mentioned. The
species names cited from Latham and Davies, * Faunula Indica,' 1795,
figure as nomina nuda, but most of them are based on the descriptions or
plates of other writers, hence entitled to full standing.
On the other hand, a glance through Mr. Sherborn's list reveals many
unfamiliar names, testifying to the care with which he has searched for-
gotten volumes. Especially to be mentioned are the specific names
quoted from Vroeg, *CataIogus Verzam. Vogelen,' 1764, and to the gen-
era given in the 1758 edition of Moehring's * Gcnerum Avium* (*Gesch-
lachten d. Vogelen'). The question of accepting Moehring's names at
1758 is one that may give rise to differences of opinion, but we are glad
* The mammal names Armodillo and Tatu occur in it.
'Among the omissions may be mentioned Rallus ecaudatus King, 1784;
Motadlla cyanca Ellis, 1782; Larus crepidatus Banks, 1773; also the species
of Hermann's Tabula Affin. Anim., 1783, and those described by Gunnerus,
in Leem's Beskr. over Finmarkens Lapper, 1767.
45 O Recent Literature, [§J
to see them in the 'Index'; it is better to include doubtful names than
to omit them, as their disposition is a matter for the decision of the
specialist.
In conclusion, we have only the highest praise to offer for Mr. Sher-
born^s work. It is to be hoped that workers in the various branches of
zo51ogy will cottperate with the compiler, with the object of gathering
up the odds and ends overlooked in the present part, that they may be
included in a later one, and we trust the undertaking will not lack the
assistance and support necessary to bring it to a successful and early
termination. — C W. R.
The * Index Zoologicus.' * — This important supplement to the well-
known * Nomenclator Zoologicus' of Scudder is based largely upon the
names recorded since 1879 in the yearly volumes of the 'Zoological
Record,* but valuable references have been gathered from other sources,
such as published lists of genera of special groups ; from works over-
looked by Agassiz, Marschall, and Scudder, as well as from manuscript
lists submitted by various systematists. About 40,000 names are given
in the * Index,' nearly one fourth of which were instituted prior to 1880;
the remainder represent the work of zoologists during twenty years, an
average of 1500 names per annum.
The new * Index ' will afford temporary relief to the zoologist, but a new
and thoroughly revised * Nomenclator * is much needed. In the * Index *
we have a worthy complementary volume to the list prepared by Scudder,
thus making accessible to workers a more complete catalogue of generic
and subgeneric names than has hitherto been possible, but it is evident
that the next edition will produce an additional large crop of forgotten
terms,^ and that perfection cannot be expected until zoological literature
' Index Zoologicus | an alphabetical list of names of genera and | subgenera
proposed for use in Zoology | as recorded in the | "Zoological Record" 1880-
1900 I together with | other names not included in the "Nomenclator | Zoolog-
icus " of S. H. Scudder | compiled (for the Zoological Society of London)
I by I Charles Owen Waterhouse | and edited by | David Sharp, M. A., F.
R. S. I Editor of the "Zoological Record" | London | Printed for the Society
I Sold at their house in Hanover Square | and by | Gumey & Jackson, Pater-
noster Row I MDCCCCII I — 8vo, pp. i-xii; 1-42 1. Price, 20 s.
^The following are suggested, in the Class Aves-. Asturaetos Brehm, 1855;
Autruchon Temm., 1840 ; Bu(iytaMthus'D2L.\\6.^ 1867 ; Calandrina Blyth, 1855;
Chlorion Temm., 1838; Cinnamopteryx Reichenow, 1886; Corax Kaup, 1854;
Cyphornis Cope, 1894; Falaiior T^mm.^ 182 1 ; Gingaia Rafin., 181 5; Huhtis
Rafin., 1815; AV//^//f2 " Blyth, 1855"; Melanopteryx Reichenow, 1886; Afise-
ryfAr us 'Newton^ 1875; Oxyporus et al. Brookes, 1828; Palaonornis Y.mxx!LOX\s^
1857; Phaeopharus Madardsz, 1900; Pomarinus Fischer, 1803; Tapera
Thunberg, 181 9; also names proposed by Bertoni (see Auk, 1902, pp. 414-
416).
^°qof ^] Recent, Literature, 45 1
has been carefully sifted on the lines so well begun by Mr Sherborn in
his *' Index Animalium/
Some errors are apparent in the * Index' that might have been avoided
had it been practicable to circulate proof-sheets among specialists for
correction. Among the bird names we note Agropsa^ for Agropsar \
Arguata^ for A r quota ; Eudates, for Bribates ; Megaquiscalis, for Mega-
quisralus ; PerenopteruSy for Percnopterus ; and Conuropsis is credited to
Hasbrouck, instead of Salvadori. — C. W. R.
Ornithological' Magazines. * The Osprey.' — With the number for Janu-
ary, 1902, *The Osprey'^ entered upon Volume I of its * New Series'
(Vol. VI of the whole series). Up to January, 1903, however, only six
numbers had appeared; another has since been printed but apparently
has not been issued. The January number contains: *The California
Jay {Apkelocoma cali/ornica) ; some of its habits and characteristics,' by
D. A. Cohen ; * Random and Reminiscent Maine Bird Notes,* by W. C.
Kendall (on the decrease of birds in Maine during the last twenty years,
and advocating more stringent bird protection) ; 'August Birds of Stony
Man Mountain, Virginia/ by William Palmer; * Life and Ornithological
Labors of Sir John Richardson,* compiled by Theodore Gill (with por-
trait of Richardson). Reviews of Lucas's * Animals of the Past (illus-
trated) ' and of Macoun's * Catalogue of Canadian Birds ' complete the
regular text, to which is added, as a separately-paged supplement, * Gen-
eral History of Birds,* Chapter I (pp. 1-4), treating of 'The English
Names,' and *The Birds' Place in Nature.'
The February number has : * Notes on the Habits of the Broad-winged
Hawk {Buteo platypterus) in the Vicinity of Washington, D. C.,' by J. H.
Riley (nest illustrated); * Rambles about my Old Home,' by Milton S.
Ray (at San Mateo, Cal., contrasting present conditions with those of
eighteen years ago) ; 'The Mocking Bird at Home,* by F. H. Knowlton ;
* Reminiscent and Random Maine Bird Notes,' by W. C. Kendall (con-
tinued from Jan. number); * Professor Alfred Newton, F. R. S.,' by Dr.
R. W. Shufeldt (with portrait). Reviews of Ridgway's * Birds of North
and Middle America,' Part I, and Herrick's * The Home Life of Wild
Birds' (with sample illustrations), complete the regular text, with pp. 5-
12 of *The General History of Birds,' containing * Characters of the
* The Osprey. An Illustrated Magazine of Ornithology. Published
monthly. Edited by Theodore Gill and Paul Bartsch, in collaboration with
Robert Ridgway, Leonhard Stejneger, Frederic A. Lucas, Charles W. Rich-
mond, William Palmer, and Harry C. Oberholser of Washington, and Witmer
Stone of Philadelphia. New Series, Vol. I, 1902, 4to, pp. i -f- 1 of
* General History of Birds.' The Osprey Company, Washington, D. C. Sub-
scriptions in United States, Canada and Mexico, $1.00 a year; single copies,
10 cents ; foreign subscriptions, $1.25 a year, postage paid.
452 Recent Literature. . [^
Class/ the * General Characters of Birds,' and the beginning of the
•* Plumage of Birds,' the latter by Dr. Hubert Lyman Clark.
The March number contains : * Notes on some Yellow- throated Vireo's
Nests,' by William R. Maxon ; *The Birds of the Marianne Islands and
their Vernacular Names. — I,' by W. E. Safford ; * Notes on McCown's
Longspur in Montana,* by P. M. Silloway ; 'The Carib Grassquit {Buetheia
bicolor omissa)^* by B. S. Bowdish ; ' Board and Lodging for Birds' ; * An
Albino Vesper Sparrow,* by R. W. Williams, Jr. ; • The Thickbilled Red-
"wing, a new bird record for Iowa,* by [P.] Bartsch ; • Biographical Notice
of John Cassin,* by Theodore Gill. Brief obituaries of Hugh Alexander
Macpherson and Alpheus Hyatt complete the number, to which are added
pp. 13, 14 of the * General History of Birds.'
The April number has : * The Feeding Habits of the Coot and other
Water Birds,' by Barton Warren Evermann, and *The Birds of the Mari-
anne Islands and their Vernacular Names, by W. E. Safford (continued
from March number). Pages 15-20 of the * General History of Birds ' are
added, treating of 'Moulting or Molting,' by William Palmer. A half-
tone frontispiece gives portraits of John Cassin, Thomas Wilson (two
views), and George A. McCall. There is a short note on each of the two
latter on p. 96 of the June number, and a biographical notice of the first
in the March number (pp. 50-53).
The May number contains : 'Winter Water Fowl of the Des Moines
Rapids,' by Ed. S. Currier ; * The Destruction of Birds by Lighthouses,*
by Bernard J. Bretherton ; and 'The Porto Rican Pewee (B/acicus blancoi),
by B. S. Bowdish. There is a further installment (pp. 21-26) of the
"' General History of Birds,' being the beginning of * Chapter II, General
Anatomy/ by Dr. R. W. Shufeldt.
The June number contains : * The Mississippi Kite {Iciim'a mtssisst'Pfi-
-ensis)^' by Albert Franklin Ganier ; ' Recent Views of the Sable Island or
Ipswich Sparrow,' by W. E. Saunders ; and * Northern Parula Warbler,*
by J. Merton Swain. Also pp. 27-34 o^ ^^^ * General History of Birds,'
^continuing the chapter on * General Anatomy.'
The July number (so far as we know not yet — Sept. 15, 1903 — dis-
tributed to subscribers, although printed some months ago) contains
•* Notes on Birds of the Pribilof Islands,' by Dr. D. W. Prentiss, Jr. ; ' A
Study of the Genus Pcrisoreusy by Reginald Heber Howe, Jr. ; * The
Cerulean Warbler, a Summer Resident near Washington,' by William R.
Maxon ; * Notice of Dr. James G. Cooper,' by William H. Dall, copied
from ' Science (only part here published and marked * to be continued ') ;
and pp. 35-42 of the General History of Birds.' A frontispiece half-tone
illustrates the ' Mississippi Kite and Nest,' and there is a portrait of the
late Dr. J. G- Cooper.
' The Osprey,* never a model in promptness of publication, has of late
fallen far below its usual standard, the last number bearing date July,
1902. We certainly hope this does not indicate its permanent demise, for
it has always been a useful Journal and is already greatly missed. —
J. A. A.
^°903^] Recent Literature, 453
Chapman^s * The Eiconomic Value of Birds to the State.* — By request
of the New York State Forest, Fish, and Game Commission, Mr. Chap-
man has prepared a paper on *The Economic Value of Birds to the
State,' ^ of which advance copies have just been received. It forms a part
of the Annual Report of the Commission for the year 1902, and consists
of nearly seventy pages of text and twelve colored plates by Fuertes,
drawn especially for the work, and effectively reproduced by Hoen &
Company of Baltimore. They form one of the most beautiful series of
bird plates yet published. The drawings are at Fuertes's best, and the
reproduction merits high praise. The twelve plates illustrate twenty-four
species of our common land birds, the leading types, from Hawks to
Thrushes.
The text is well worthy of the beautiful plates. Although, as the case
necessarily requires, the paper is largely a compilation, the selections are
judiciously made, as regards sources of information and choice of matter,
which is largely from special bulletins and reports on the food habits of
birds published by the Biological Survey, under the auspices of the U. S.
Department of Agriculture. The first twenty pages are devoted to a gen-
eral discussion of the economic value of birds to the forester, the fruit-
grower, the farmer, and the citizen, being a statement of * What the bird
does for the State,' followed by * What the State does for the Bird,* and
*What the State should do for the Bird.* This is succeeded by ' Statistics
of Food Habits ' (pp. 23-63), in which the leading groups, and certain of
the species, of land birds are treated in systematic sequence ; and to this
is added a bibliography of about seventy-five titles, listing the more
important papers relating to the food of American birds.
The attitude of the author on the question of ' The Bird and the State '
may be indicated by the following extract from his opening paragraph :
"The bird is the property of the State. From this fundamental con-
ception of the bird's legal status there can be no logical ground for dissent.
If a certain species of bird is conclusively proven to be injurious to the
agricultural or other interests of the State, no one would deny the State's
right to destroy that species. If, on the contrary, a species is shown to
be beneficial, then the State has a right to protect it. Indeed, we may go
further and say it is not only the right, but the duty of the State to give
its birds the treatment they deserve."
Mr. Chapman's paper is an excellent compendium of our present knowl-
edge of the economic relations of our birds, and the New York State
Forest, Fish, and Game Commission has shown an intelligent conception
of its duties and functions in placing before the public so important a
memoir in such an attractive form. — J. A. A.
* State of New York | Forest, Fish and Game Commission | — | The
Economic Value of Birds | to the State | By | Frank M. Chapman | Associate
Curator of Mammalogy and Ornithology in the American | Museum of Nat-
ural History | [Seal] Albany | J. B. Lyon Company, Printers | 1903 — 4to,
pp. 1-66, 12 colored plates. September, 1903.
454 Recent Literature. [o^
Publications Received. — Alexander, Boyd. On the Birds of Fernando
Po. (Ibis, July, 1903, pp. 3^30-403 ; also separate, pp. 75.)
Anderson, Malcolm P., and Joseph Grinnell. Birds of the Siskiyou
Mountains^: A Problem in Distribution. (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila-
delphia, 1903, pp. 4-15.)
Bau, Alexander. Antwort au Herrn Dr. Kurt Floricke. 8vOt pp. 4.
Bonhote, J. Lewis. On a Collection of Birds from the Northern Islands
of the Bahama Group. (Ibis, July, 1903, pp. 273-315.)
Dresser, H. E. A Manual of Palaearctic Birds. Svo, London. Pub-
lished by the Author, 3 Hanover Square, W. Price, 25 s.
Dubois, Alphonse. Synopsis Avium, Fasc XIII and XIV, 1903.
Dutcher, William. The Flicker. (National Committee of Audubon
Societies, Leaflet No. 5.)
Grinnell, Joseph. Call Notes of the Bushtit. (Condor, V, No. 4, July,
1903.)
Hartert, Ernst, und Carl Hellmayr. Ueber die Pipriden-Gattung
Afasius Bp. (Orn. Monatsb., No. 3, Marz, 1903.)
Hellmayr, C. E. (i) Ueber neue und wenig bekannte sUdamerikanische
Vogel. (Verhandl. der k. k. zool.-bot. Gesells. in Wien, 1903, pp. 199-
223.) (2) Einige weitere Bemerkungen iXher Poiioptila, {/did., pp. 223-
226.)
Huntington, Dwight W. Our Feathered Game. Svo, Charles Scrib-
ner's Sons, New York. Price, $2.00 net.
Lorenz, Dr. L. von, und C. E. Hellmayr. Ein Beitrag zur Ornis Silda-
rabiens. (Denks. Math -Naturwis. Classe d. Kais. Akad. d. Wissenschaften
zu Wien, LXXI, 1902, pp. 1-18.)
Macoun.John. Catalogue of Canadian Birds. Part II. Ottawa, Geol.
Surv. of Canada. Price, 10 cents.
Oberholser, Harry C. (i) A New Cliff Swallow from Texas. (Proc.
Biol. Soc. Wash., XVI, pp. 15, 16.) (2) Description of a New Vireo.
{Idid.y pp. 17, 18.) (3) Note on the Generic Name Hylophilus, {Ibid., p.
lOI.)
Rathbun, Richard. Report upon the Condition and Progress of the
U. S. National Museum during the year ending June 30, 190X. (Report
U. S. Nat. Miis. for 1901, pp. 1-174.)
Schiebel, Guide, (i) Die Phylogenese der Lanius-Pixien. (Ornith.
Monatsb., 1903, pp. 105-112.) (2) In welchem Monat bekommt der
schwarzstirnige Wilrger {Lanins minor Gm.) sein Alterskleid ? (Orn.
Jahrb., 1903, pp. 140-143.)
Shufeldt, R. W. (i) Bird Photographs for Bird-books. (Profess, and
Amateur Photog., July, 1903, pp. 245-250.) (2) Photographing Quails
and Partridges. (Amer. Inventor, July 15, 1903, pp. 35-36.)
Torrey, Bradtord. The Clerk of the Woods. i6mo, Houghton,
Mifflin and Company, 1903. Price, $1.10, net.
Tschusi zu Schmidhoffen, Vict. Ritter von. (i) Ueber Palaearktische
Formen. (Ornithol. Jahrb., XIV, 1903, pp. 138-140.) (2) Zoologische
^°9<^^] Recent Literature, 455
Litteratur der Steiermark. Ornithologische Literatur. (Mitteil. Natur-
wiss. Ver. f. Steiermark, 1902, pp. Iviii-lxii.)
Wilson, James. Regulations for the Protection of Game in Alaska.
(Biolog. Surv. Circular No. 39.)
Aquila, IX, 1902, Supplementum. 1903.
American Ornithology, III, Nos. 7-9, July-Sept., 1903.
Anales del Museo Nacional de Montevideo, IV, pt. i and 2, 1903.
Annals of Scottish Natural History, No. 47, July, 1903.
Atlantic Slope Naturalist, No. 3, July-August, 1903.
Avicultural Magazine, New Ser., I, Nos, 9-1 x, July-Sept., 1903.
Bird-Lgre, V, No. 4, July-Aug., 1903.
Birds and Nature, No. 2, Sept., 1903.
Bulletin British Orn. Club, No. XCIX, 1903.
Bulletin Michigan Orn. Club, IV, No. 2, June, 1903.
Canadian Record of Science, IX, No. i, 1903.
Condor, The, V, No. 4, July-Aug., 1903.
Emu, III, Pt. I, July, 1903.
Forest and Stream, LXI, Nos. 1-13, 1903.
Knowledge, XXVI, Nos. 213-215, July-Sept., 1903.
Monthly Bulletin, Pennsylvania Dept. Agric, Nos. 3-5, July-Sept.,
1903-
Naturalist, The, Monthly Journ. of Nat. Hist, for North of England,
Nos. 558-560, July-Sept., 1903.
Omithologische Monatsberichte, XI, Nos. 7-9, July-Sept., 1903.
Omithologische Monatsschrift, XXVII, No. 6, June, 1903.
Omithologisches Jahrbuch, XIV, Mai-Aug., 1903.
Ottawa Naturalist, XVII, Nos. 4-6, July-Sept., 1903.
Our Animal Friends, XXX, Nos. 11, 12, XXXI, No. i, July-Sept., 1903.
Proceedings Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1903, Pt. x.
Records of the Australian Museum, V, No. i, April, 1903.
Science, N. S., XVIII, Nos. 444-456, 1903.
WUson Bulletin, X, No. 3.
Zo51og^cal Quarterly Bulletin, Pennsylvania Dept. Agric. I, No. 2,
Aug., 1903.
Zoologist, The, (4) VII, Nos. 745-747, July-Sept., 1903.
45 6 Corresfondenct, f
Aak
Oct.
CORRESPONDENCE.
The Use of Trinomials.
Editors of * The Auk ' : —
Dear Sirs : — While further discussion of trinomials is perhaps unnec-
essary I am tempted to comment upon some misleading statements in
Mr. Loomis's article in the Julj issue of *The Auk,* especially since his
paper so thoroughly voices the popular outcry against the recognition of
geographic races, and would seem to dispose of the difficulties in the case
so easily.
(i) Mr. Loomis^s parallel between the recognition in nomenclature of
sexes and seasonal plumages on the one hand and geographic races on the
other seems ill founded. It is true of course that we do not recognize
plumages as distinct species when we have learned their real nature, but
any one who has read Dr. Dwight's paper (Auk, 1902, p. 348) will surely
admit that we have by no means abandoned a distinct nomenclature for
plumages ; indeed, the most flagrant trinomial must pale into insignifi-
cance beside the ''compound juveno-non-nuptial plumage" I
(2) Mr. Loom is constantly speaks of ''geographic variants " and "full
fledged species " as if the two were readily distinguishable. If he can
formulate any way by which we can separate species and subspecies
except by individual opinion, he has indeed solved the problem. It seems
to me that the one fact that is being inevitably forced upon us by modern
systematic study is that the "geographic variants" are the fundamental
elements which in any nomenclature must receive primary recognition.
Many of our old-time "species " have been found utterly inadequate in their
application and the independent recognition of their components and of
allied forms unknown when the "species" were established is inevitable.
To extend the limits of a "species" to include without further comment
such diverse forms as the extremes of the Song Sparrow series would ren-
der systematic nomenclature absurd and well nigh useless.
Dr. Allen has to my mind put the matter very dearly when he claimed
that we can be no more expected to keep our investigations in systematic
zoology within the limits easily comprehended by the laity than the his-
tologist can be expected to confine his labors to the same bounds.
Dr. Dwight's statement, after his exhaustive studies of plumages, that
"the facts about plumages and moults do not lend themselves to simple
explanation " and "will no doubt seem obscure and complicated " applies
exactly and with added force to modern systematic researches.
That our present rules of nomenclature may have to be altered in some
respects I will admit, but as I have already stated (Condor, 1903, p. 43)
I regard the preservation of trinomials as of the greatest importance.
Very truly yours,
WiTMER Stone.
Acad, Nat, Set'., Phila,y Sept. 17, 1903.
^°9<?*] ^''*** '"^ Ntws. 457
NOTES AND NEWS.
The Twenty-first Annual Congress of the American Ornitholo-
gists' Union will be held at the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadel-
phia, beginning on the evening of Monday, November i6, 1903. The
evening session will be for the election of officers and members and for
the transaction of routine business. Tuesday and the following days the
sessions will be for the presentation and discussion of scientific papers,
and will be open to the public. Members intending to present commun-
ications are requested to forward the titles of their papers to the Secre-
tary, Mr. John H. Sage, Portland, Conn., so as to reach him not later
than November 13.
Professor Wilber Clinton Knight, an Associate of the American
Ornithologists' Union, died at his home at Laramie, Wyoming, July 28,
19031 of peritonitis, after an illness of six days. Prof. Knight was born
at Rochelle, Ills., Dec. 13, 1858. His boyhood days were passed upon the
farm where daily communion with Nature exercised a marked influence
upon his tastes, which were early indicated by his choice of books and
the lines of study he pursued. With his people he moved to Nebraska
where he obtained his education, graduating a Bachelor of Science from
the State University in 1886. Immediately following his graduation he
was appointed Assistant Territorial Geologist for Wyoming, and there-
after progress in his profession may be summed up as follows : The year
1887-88, Assayer at Cheyenne; Superintendent of mines in Colorado
and Wyoming, 1888 to 1893; Professor of Mining, University of
Wyoming, 1893 and 1894 ; Professor of Geology, Mining Engineering,
Principal of the School of Mines, Geologist of the Wyoming Agricul-
tural Experiment Station, and Curator of University Museum from 1894
to date of his death; State Geologist 1898-99.
Well earned post graduate degrees of M. A. and Ph. D. were conferred
upon Prof. Knight by the University of Nebraska in 1893 and 1901,
respectively.
Numerous publications from his pen, usually in the form of bulletins
or magazine articles, have appeared from time to time, the most impor.
tant of the former being as follows : Bulletin No. i, *The Petroleum of
the Salt Creek Oil Field, its Technology and Geology,* 1896. Bulletin
No. 2, * The Petroleum Oil Fields of the Shoshone Anticlinal, Geology
of the Popo Agie, Lander and Shoshone Oil Fields,' 1897. Bulletin
No. 3, *The Geology of the Oil Fields of Crook and Uinta Counties,
Wyo.,* 1899. Bulletin No. 4. 'Geology of the Oil Fields of Natrona
County, Excepting Salt Creek/ Bulletin No. 5, *The Newcastle Oil
Fields, Wyo.* Bulletin No. 6, * The Bonanza, Cottonwood and Douglas
Oil Fields,' 1903. Bulletin No. 14, * Geology of the Wyoming Experi-
ment Farms,' 1893. Special Bulletin, * The Sweetwater Mining Diitrict.*
458 Notes and News, [^
Bulletin 49, ' Alkali Lakes and Deposits * ; and Bulletin No. 55, * The
Birds of Wyoming.'
A list of other publications which appeared in * Science,' *The Engi-
neering and Mining Journal/ *The American Manufacturer and Iron
World,' * Mineral Industry/ * American Journal of Science/ * National
Geographic Magazine/ * Journal of Geology/ 'Bulletin of the Geological
Society of America/ Reports of the U. S. Geological Survey, and other
periodicals of high standing, would include about forty titles, all of which
were exploitations of the results of original research and painstaking
investigation.
Of his bulletins, No. 55, *The Birds of Wyoming,* is the only one
devoted to the subject in which the readers of ' The Auk ' have especial
interest. While ornithology was a subject of secondary interest to Prof.
Knight, the character of his bird work is in ^y^ry way commendable.
In his introductory to this bulletin the author says : "Being a geologist
it may appear strange for me to pose as the author of a bird bulletin."
One thing, however, was made plain ; there was a great public demand
for such a bulletin. It may be said, also, that such demand was supplied
by this publication. It is interesting to note in this connection, that
the demand for this publication shows that itfe popularity is greater than
that of any other bulletin issued by authority of the Wyoming University.
That extreme care and anxiety to be strictly accurate which marks all of
the published works of Prof. Knight, is conspicuous here, the author's
aim being to secure a correct list of Wyoming birds rather than a large
one. A hypothetical list at the close of the bulletin supplied a place for
species many less careful authors would have placed among the unques-
tioned birds of the State.
As a citizen and a man Prof. Knight stood in the first rank. He
believed the interests of the community and of the State should command
a reasonable share of the time and energy of the individual and he gave
freely of both for the promotion of the general welfare. He died poor
in worldly goods but rich in worthy accomplishments. His integrity,
unassailable and unquestioned, often stood in the way of pecuniary
advancement, but his record, now made up, is one his sons may emulate
without fear of making a mistake. In his untimely death the American
Ornithologists^ Union loses an able and painstaking student and
Associate. — F. B.
Dr. GusTAV F. R. von Radde, a Corresponding Fellow of the Amer-
ican Ornithologists' Union, died early in the present year at Tiflis, Russia,
in his 72d year. He was born at Danzig, November 27, 1831. From a
short sketch of Dr. Radde's life published in * The Ibis' (July, 1903, pp.
439, 440) we learn that he was the son of a schoolmaster, and early
showed his predilection for Natural History. In 1852 and the following
years he was employed in the Crimea as an assistant to the botanist
Steven, and in 1854 published a memoir on the botany of the Tauric
Peninsula. In 1855 he was called to St. Petersburg by the Russian
Geographical Society to join Schwartz's expedition to Amoorland, where
he spent four years in exploration, the results of which were published
in his well-known * Reisen im Sflden von Ost Sibirien/ in several quarto
volumes with numerous plates, by the Russian Geographical Society in
1862-63. The second^ volume, entitled * Die Festlands-Ornis des
SUddstlichen Siberiens,' is his most important ornithological publication,
and through which he is well known to ornithologists. In 1864 "he
took up his residence at Tiflis, where he founded a Natural History
Museum and Library and remained actively engaged in their administra-
tion and on various kindred pursuits up to the time of his death. Next
to the Siberian volume, Radde^s *Ornis Caucasica/ published at Cassel
in 1884, is the one amongst his numerous scientific works and memoirs,
illustrative of the Natural History of the Caucasus and of adjoining por-
tions of the Russian dominions, by which he is best known to ornithol-
ogists." He was throughout his life an ardent traveller, and in recent
years made voyages to Japan, India, and North Africa, with members of
the Imperial family, with whom he seems to have been a favorite. "At
the time of his death he was engaged in the preparation of an account
of the collections of the Caucasian Museum, of which three volumes (out
of six) have already appeared."
The Annual meeting of 'the British Ornithologists^ Union was held
at the meeting-room of the Zo51ogical Society of London on the evening
of May 13. Dr. F. DuCane Godman was reelected President and Mr.
Howard Saunders Secretary. Twenty new Ordinary Members were
elected, and Capt. F. W. Hutton, F. R. S., Col. W. Vincent Legge, F. Z.
S., and Alfred J. North, were elected Colonial Members, and Dr. Giacinto •
Martorelli, of Milan, a Foreign Member. Mr. Robert Ridgway was
transferred from the list of Foreign Members to that of Honorary Mem-
bers— the only American on whom has been conferred this honor since
the decease of Professor Baird. In this connection it may be mentioned
that Mr. Frank M. Chapman was elected a Foreign Member at the annual
meeting in 1902.
Major Edgar A. Mearns, Medical Department U. S. Army, was
ordered to the Philippines some months since, and sailed from San
Francisco for his new post of duty about the end of last June.
Dr. Charles C. Adams, curator of the University of Michigan
Museum at Ann Arbor, has announced, in a recent number of 'Science^
(Aug. 14, p. 217; see also Bull. Michigan Orn. Club, IV, p. 63) the dis-
covery of the breeding area of Kirtland^s Warbler {Dendroica kirtlandt).
The capture of a specimen in June last in Oscoda County, Michigan, by
Mr. E. H. Frothingham (see Bull. Michigan Orn. Club, IV, p. 47) led to
460 Notes and News. [^
the sending of Mr. N. A. Wood, the taxidermist of the Museum, to make
a thorough search for the nest and eggs of this rare species. The quest
was successful, Mr. Wood securing "two nests with young and one egg^
thus establishing beyond question the breeding area of this species,"
which had been heretofore wholly a matter of conjecture.
According to a recently published report (P. Z. S., 1902, pp. 166-171)
by the Secretary of the London Zoological Society, there were living in
the Society's Gardens, in January, 1902, 147 specimens of Parrots, refer-
able to 107 species, including several of great rarity. The oldest bird in
the Parrot-house was a Cockatoo (Cacatua gymnopis), which had been
in the Society's possession for 33 years. The report is accompanied by
a colored plate of EcUctus westermanni^ showing the green male and the
red, blue-breasted female, and also a plate of the rare Plaiycercus master-
sianus,
*OuR Animal Friends,' with the iirst number of Volume XXXI,
appears in a new form and certainly has a very * up to date ' appearance.
Its opening editorial presents "a retrospective glance at the progress of
the work of animal protection during the past thirty years," briefly con-
trasting now with then. The change, as is stated, is due to education,^ in
which the management of this magazine has taken so prominent a part.
''The public conscience no longer tolerates cruelty, and to prove the fact
of cruelty, however influentially supported, brings public opinion, in its
ultimate form of legal enactment, when that is necessary, to the vindica-
tion of the rights of the weak against the inhumanity of the strong and
the thoughtless." ' Our Animal Friends * has our highest respect and our
bejst wishes, and we trust that its future career will be as influential and
as successful in this great cause as it has been in the past.
Mr. S. N. Rhoads is preparing a paper, to be presented at the next
meeting of the A. O. U., to be held in Philadelphia in November, on the
zoology of Delaware, with special reference to birds, and would be very
glad to receive information — lists and specimens — bearing on the sub-
ject. Any assistance thus rendered will be duly accredited. Mr. Rhoads's
present address is 121 S. 3rd St., Philadelphia, Pa.
INDEX TO VOLUME XX.
[New generic, specific and tubspecific names are printed in heavy-fmced type.]
AcANTHis linariaf 236.
hornemanui exilipes, 282.
Accipiter atricapillus, 53, 212.
atricapillus striatulus, 183.
cooper!, 183, 205.
velox rufilatuSf 183, 364.
Acredula, 198.
Acrocephalus familiaris, 384, 390.
Actitis macularia, 33, 281.
Actodromas, 335.
acuminata, 336.
bairdii, 336.
damacensis, 336.
fuscicollis, 336.
maculata, 336.
minutilla, 336.
^gialitis meloda, 22, 305, 364.
meloda circumcincta, 364.
semipalmata, 22.
vociiera, 204, 263, 281.
wilsonia, 22.
^pjornis, 323.
yEsalon, 339.
^strelata hypoleuca, 386.
Agelaius chrysopierus, 12.
gubernator californicus, 186.
phceniceus, 206.
phceniceus neutralie, 186.
phceniceus richmondi, 76,
365.
tricolor, 186.
Agropsa, 451.
Agropsar, 451.
Aiaia ajaja, 22.
Albatross, Laysan, 385.
Alca torda, 51.
pygmaea, 359.
Alle alle, 51, 209.
Allen, Francis H., the Blue-gray
Gnatcatcher in Massachusetts,
69; vernacular names of birds,
236.
Allen, J. A., the A. O. U. Check-
list— its history and its future,
1-9; vernacular names of birds,
7^>-73 i "^o^c ^^ Psittacula mo-
desfa Cabanis, 213; note on
Sylvia cterulea Wilson, 216-
218; 'some suggestions,' 234;
the California Meeting of the
American Ornithologist's Union,
299-302.
Aluco, 360.
Aluconidse, 360.
Amazilia aliciae, 290.
American Museum of Natural His-
tory, notice of its * Bird Rock
Group,' and * Shore Bird Group,'
246.
American Ornithologists' Union,
Twentieth Congress of, 59-63 ;
notice of a proposed meeting to
be held in California, 245;
report of the California meeting,
399-302 ; Twelfth Supplement to
the Check-List of North Amer-
ican Birds, 331-368; Twenty-
first Congress, 457.
Ammodramus, 350.
australis, 362.
bimaculatus, 349.
halophilus, 79, 348.
henslowi, 232.
maritimus,36i.
maritimus macgillivraii, 361.
rostratus guttatus, 79, 365.
rostratus halophilus, 365.
samuelis, 296, 351.
sandwichensis, 283.
savannarum, 13, 178.
savannarum passerinus, 264,
362.
Ampelis cedrorum, 283.
garrulus, 283.
Amphispiza belli nevadensis, 207,
366.
nevadensis, 366.
Anas acuta, 251.
boschas, 204, 209, 278, 303.
laysanensis, 384, 396.
obscura rubripes, 226.
Ancylocheilus, 337.
Anhinga, 323.
Anous stolidus, 385.
462
Indtx,
TAuk
LOct.
Anser albifrons gambeli, 52.
Anthony, A. W., migration of
Richardson's Grouse, 24-27.
Antrostomus vociferus, 23, 264.
Ant-shrike, Barred, 291.
Aphelocoma sieberii couchii, 345.
Aquila chrysaCtos, 67, 183, 439.
Aram us giganteus, 22, 169, 175.
Archaeopteryx, 323.
Archibuteo lagopus sanctijohannis,
269.
Ardea caerulea, 334.
canadensis, 251.
candidissima, 333.
egretta, 333.
garzetta, 333
herodias, 332.
herodias wardi, 332.
iavanica, 334.
ludoviciana, 334.
occidentalism 22.
rufa, 333.
rufescens, 333.
violacea, 335.
virepcens, 174, 334.
virescens anthonyi,"334.
virescens frazari, 334.
wardi, 332.
Ardetta exilis, 22, 263.
Arenaria interpres, 210.
melanocephala, 33.
morinella, 22.
Arguata, 451.
Arquata, 451.
Arquatella, 335.
couesi, 335.
maritima, 335.
ptilocnemis, 335.
Asio, 273.
accipitrinus, 212.
otus, 274.
virginianus, 275.
virginianus pacificus, 275.
virginianus pallescens, 275.
virginianus saturatus, 275.
virginianus subarcticus, 275.
Astragalinus psaltria, 1S8.
psaltria arizonae, 79, 347.
tristis, 206.
Asturaetos, 450.
Asjndesmus, 341.
torquatus, 341.
Atlantic Slope Naturalist, notice
of, 328.
Audubon, John James, letters from
to Edward Harris, 378-383.
Audubon Societies, third annual
conference of, 99 ; notice of * Edu-
cational Leaflets' issued by the
National Committee of, 248.
Auk, Great, 83.
Razor-billed, 51.
Auklet, Gassings, 30.
Autruchon, 450.
Aythya affinis, 22, 64, 278.
collaris, 22, 279.
marila, 64, 278.
marila nearctica, 165.
vallisneria, 278.
B^OLOPHUs, 308, 357.
atricristatus, 308, 358.
bicolor, 308, 358.
bicolor texensis, 308, 358.
inornatus, 308, 358.
inornatus cineraceus, 308,
358.
inornatus griseus, 308, 358.
wollweberi, 308, 358.
Bailey, -Florence Merriam, review
of her ^ Handbook of Birds of the
Western United States,' 76-78. |
Baily, William L., see Dutcher,
William.
Baldpate, 378.
Bangs, Outram, notice of his papers
on new American birds, 320;
notice of his Revised List of
the Birds of the Liu Kiu Islands,
320.
Barlow, Chester, obituary notice
of, 92.
Barrett-Hamilton, G. E. H., notice
of his paper * On the Position
occupied by the Legs of Birds
during Flight,' 321.
Bartramia longicauda, 65, 281.
Basileuterus, 75.
culicivorus flavescens, 75.
Bellona exilis, 23.
Bent, A. C, Black Vulture at Taun-
ton, Mass., 67.
Bcrniera, 391.
Bignell, Effie, notice of her * My
Woodland Intimates,' 316.
Bird, Frigate, 285, 386.
Miller, 384, 390, 392.
Rice, 170.
Red-tailed Tropic, 385.
Bird-Lore, review of Volume IV,
222-225.
Bird of Washington, 382.
Bittern, American, 280.
Least, 263.
Vol. xxn
»903 J
Index,
463
Bishop, L. B., see Sanford, L. C.
Blacicus blancoi, 11, 194.
Blackbird, Bicolored, 106.
Brewer's, 46, 186, 206.
Red-winged, 46, 206.
San Diego Red-winged, 186.
Tri-colored, 186.
Yellow-headed, 46, 186, 282.
Yellow-shouldered, 12, 206.
Blackbirds, 255-257.
Blatchley, w! S., notice of his * A
Nature Wooing at Ormond by
the Sea/ 83.
Bluebird, 70, 261.
Mountain, 103, 209.
Bob-white, 161-164, 252, 263.
Bolborhyncus, 31 1.
Bonasa umbellus togata, 281.
umbellMS unibelloides, 281.
Bonhote, J. Lewis, bird migration
at some of the Bahama Light-
houses, 169-179; notice of his
• Field Notes on Some Bahama
Birds, ^ 230 ; notice of his * On a
Collection of Birds from the
Northern Islands of the Bahama
Group,' 447.
Booby, White, 287.
Laysan, 385.
Botaurus lentiginosus, 22, 280.
Bowdish, B. S., birds of Porto Rico,
10-23 ; food habits of some West
Indian birds, 193-195-
Brachyrhamphus craveri, 79.
hypoleucus, 79.
Braislin, William C., notes con-
cerning certain birds of Long
Island, N. Y., 50-53.
Brant, 439.
Branta bernicla, 439.
canadensis, 280, 439.
Breninger, Geo. F., Western Even-
ing Grosbeaks nesting in Mexico,
68; Sabine's Gull at Monterey,
California, 433 ; nests and eggs
of Cceligena clemencicB^ 435.
Brewster, William, breeding
grounds of the Black and
Socorro Petrels — a correction,
63 ; review of his * Birds of the
Cape Region of Lower Califor-
nia,' 78-80 ; further notes on the
Philadelphia Vireo, with descrip-
tion of the nest and eggs, 369-
376 ; an interesting Solitary
Vireo (Vireo solitarius), 437.
Brooks, Allan, n^^^** on the birds
of the Cariboo District, British
Columbia, 277-284.
Brown, Herbert, Arizona bird
notes, 43-50.
Bryan, William Alanson, a Turn-
stone taken in the Mid-Pacific..
210; the Short-eared Owl (Asio
accipitrinus) taken far out at Sea,
212.
Bubo, 273.
Virginian us arcticus, 364.
virginianus elachistus, 79,
341-
virginianus pallescens, 205.
virginianus saturatus, 183.
virginianus subarcticus, 364.
Bubotus, 274.
Bucco bicinctus, 289.
Budytanthus, 450.
Bufflehead, 279.
Bunting, Henslow's, 232.
Lazuli, 190, 207.
Burroughs, John, notice of his
♦John James Audubon,' 85.
Burtis, Henry Mott, the Dovekie
(All e a lie) on Long Island, N. Y.,
209; Barn Owl on Long Island,
N. Y., 212.
Buteo albicaudatus, 288.
borealis, 269.
borealis calurus 79, 183, 205.
boreal is lucasanus, 79, 339.
borealis socorroensis, 364.
borealis umbrinus, 364.
lineatus, 269.
platypterus, 23.
swainsoni, 44.
Buteola, 360.
Butorides, 334.
virescens, 49, 334.
virescens anthonyi, 334.
virescens frazari, 3^4.
Buzzard, White-tailed, 280.
Cacatua gymnopis, 460.
Caica, 311.
Calandrina, 450.
Calidris arenaria, 22, 280.
Calypte anna, 184.
Canachites canadensis, 359.
canadensis canace, 359.
canadensis Osgood i, 359.
franklini, 281.
Canvas-back, 278.
Caprimulgus, 360.
Cardellina rubrifrons, 75.
Cardinal, 54, 257.
464
Index.
TAuk
LOct.
Cardinalis cardinalis, 54.
cardinalis cardinalis, 295.
Carpodacus cassini, 187, 282.
dementis, 33.
mexicanus frontalis, 167, 187,
217.
mexicanus obscurus, 217.
purpureus, 264.
purpureus californicus, 187.
Cassinia, see Delaware Vallej Or-
nithological Club.
Catbird, ^, 261, 284.
Catharista urubu, 67, 287.
Cathartes aura, 53, 6(5, 183, 205.
Catherpes, 196.
mexicanus, 196.
mexicanus albifrons, 196.
mexicanus conspersus, 198.
mexicanus mexicanus, 196.
mexicanus polioptilus, 197.
mexicanus punctulatus, 197.
Centrocercus urophasianus, 204.
Centurus, 342.
aurifrons, 342.
carolinus, 342.
nyeanus, 434.
uropygialis, 43, 44, 342.
Ceophlceus pileatus, 282.
pileatus abieticola, 184.
Cerchneis, 339.
sparverius paulus, 364.
Certhia albifrons, 196.
familiaris americana, 266.
famillaris zelotes, 192.
palustris, 356.
Certhidia, 402-404, 406, 410, 412-
416.
olivacea luteola, 411.
Ceryle alcjon, 170, 183.
Chamuea fasciata, 367.
fasciata henshawi, 367.
fasciata intermedia, 367.
Chamajpelia passerina, 177, 359.
ChamaethlvpiR, 75.
Chamberlain, Montague, see Nutt-
all, Thomas.
Chapman, Frank M., notice of his
'The Economic Value of Birds
to the State,' 453.
Charadrius dominicus, 22, 281.
fulvus, 174.
montanus, 338.
wilsonia, 338.
Charitonetta, 359.
albeola, 279.
Chat, 266.
Long-tailed, 208.
Cheiroxiphia lanceolata, 291.
Chen hyperborea, 22.
hyperborea nivalis, 22.
Chewink, 216.
Chickadee, Barlow's, 359.
Mountain, 192.
Oregon, 208.
Chlorion, 450.
Chlorostilbon caribbaea, 290.
Chondestes grammacus, 440.
grammacus strigatus, 207.
Chordeiles henryi, 206.
minor, 23, 431.
virginianus, 184,264,324,434.
Virginian us chapman i, 432.
virginianus minor, 432.
virginianus vicinus, 431.
Chuck-bird, 258.
Cinclus cinclus, 291.
mexicanus, 192.
Cinnamopteryx, 450.
Circus hudsonius, 205.
Cistothorus griseus, 356.
marianae, 357.
palustris dissaSptus, 367.
palustris paludicola, 356.
palustris plesius, 208, 357.
Clangula clangula, 359.
clangula americana, 279.
glaucion, 359.
islandica, 279.
Clark, Austin H., notes on the
habits of certain Venezuelan
birds, 285-293; the Black-winged
Palm Tanager, 398-402.
Clark, J. H., a much mated House
Sparrow, 306.
Clark, John N., the domestic affairs
of Bob-white, 161-164; obituary
notice of, 242.
Cleckley, M. T., nest and eggs of
the Swainson's Warbler {Helinaia
swainson/i)y 438.
Coccothraustes, 346.
ruber, 295.
vespertinus, 213.
vespertinus montanus, 68,
187.
Coccyzus americanus, 68, 177, 179.
erythrophthalmus, 23.
Cocornis, 402-406, 410, 412-416.
agassizi, 411.
Coeligena clemencise, 435.
Coereba portoricensis, 17.
Colaptes auratus, 254, 282.
cafer collaris, 184, 205, 282.
chrysocaulosus, 194.
Vol. XX "1
1903 J
Index,
465
Colinus virginianus, 263.
Columba corensis, 23.
inornataf 23.
leucocephala, 174.
migratoria, 252.
Columbigallina passerina palles-
cens, 360.
passerina terrestris, 359.
Colymbidae, 363.
Coljmbus auritus, 278.
dominicensis, 21.
holboellii, 278.
Compsothlypis americana, 18.
americana ramalinx, 74, 367.
nigrilora, 367.
pitiajuma nigrilora, 367.
Condor, The, review of Volume IV,
319-322.
Contopus, 365.
borealis, 184.
richardsonii, 184.
richardsoni saturatus, 365.
Conuropsis, 451.
Conurus scruginosus, 287.
maugei (.^), 20.
Cooley, R. A., Wood Ibis in Mon-
tana, 210.
Coot, American, 280.
Corax, 450.
Cormorant, Brandt's, 32.
Farallone, 32.
Corvus americanus, 57, 269-271.
corax sinuatus, 33.
leucognaphalus, 11.
ossifragus, 269-271.
Colurniculus, 349.
bairdii, 349.
savannarum bimaculatus,349.
savannarum iloridanus, 350.
savannarum passerinus, 349.
Coue8*s * Key to North American
Birds,' publishers' announce-
ments respecting a new edition
of, 97, 244.
Cowbird, Dwarf, 46.
Crane, 2^1.
Sandhill, 280.
Whooping, 252.
Creeper, Brown, 266.
Sierra, 192.
Crossbill, American, 264.
Sierra, 187.
Crow, American, 206, 255.
Australian Piping, 444.
Common, 57, 267-271.
Clark, 220.
Clarke, 221.
Crow, Fish, 269-271.
West Indian, 11.
Crj^ptoglaux, 364.
Cuckoo, Yellow-billed, 68.
Curlew, Hudsonian, 33.
Long-billed, 281.
Cyanocitta couchii, 345.
steMeri borealis, 362.
stelleri carbonacea, 220, 365.
stelleri frontalis, 185.
Cjanospiza amoena, 190, 207.
cj^anea, 173.
Cyclorrhjrnchus, 359.
Cygnus, 359.
Cyphornis, 450.
Cypseloides niger, 282.
Cyrtonyx montezumx, 338.
montezumae mearnsi, 338.
Dafila acuta, 22, 164, 278, 303.
Daggett, F. S., see Grinnell, J.
Deane, Ruthven, additional records
of the European Widgeon
{Mareca penelope) in Indiana,
303 ; Richardson's Owl {Nyctala
tengmalmi richardsoni) in Illi-
nois, 305, 433.
Degen, Edward, notice of his
memoir 'Ecdysis, as morpholog-
ical evidence of the original
tetradactyle feathering of the
bird's fore-limb, based on the
perennial moult in Gymuorkina
tibiceny 444-446.
Delaware Valley Ornithological
Club, notice of its annual, ' Cas-
sinia,' 231 ; notice of annual
meeting of, 328.
Dendragapus obscurus fuliginosus,
182.
obscurus richardsoni, 280.
Dendrocygna arborea, 22.
Dendroica, 217.
adelaidae, 18.
sstiva, 208.
£8tiva morcomi, 191.
auduboni, 191, 284.
auduboni nigrifrons, 355.
blackburniae, 266.
caerulea, 169, 171, 216, 367.
cxrulescens, 23, 171.
carbonata, 74.
coronata, 18, 171, 178.
coronata hooveri, 191.
discolor, 19, 171.
dominica, 23, 171.
evelynae, 169.
466
Index,
T KxSk
LOct.
Dendroica kirtlandi, 225, 459.
maculosa, 18, 284.
montana, 74, 361.
nigrifrons, 355.
occidentalis, 191.
palmarum, 18, 171, 178, 265.
petechia bartholemica, 18.
rara, 216, 266, 367.
striata, 23, 171, 177, 284.
tigrina, 18, 171, 218.
townsendi, 191.
virens, 265, 361.
Dendroplex longirostris, 291.
Dichromanassa, 333.
rufescens, 333.
Dickcisself 440.
Diomedea immutabilis, 385.
nigripes, 385.
Dipper, American, 192.
Doleromya pallida, 290.
Dolichonyx oryzivorus, 170, 179.
Doran, Edwin W., the vernacular
names of birds, 38-42.
Dorichia evelynae, 174.
Dove, Common Ring, 22S.
Mourning, 182, 205, 248,
263, 281.
Red Ring, 228.
Dovekie, 51, 209.
Dresser, H. E., notice of his *A
Manual of Palsearctic Birds,'
441.
Dryobates lucasanus, 365.
pubescens, 255.
pubescens gairdneri, 221.
pubescens homorus, 221, 282,
360.
pubescens leucurus, 221, 360.
pubescens nelsoni, 221.
pubescens oreoecus, 221.
pubescens turati, 221, 341.
scalaris lucasanus, 365.
villosus, 255, 264.
villosus hvloscopus, 1S3, 281.
villosus leucomelas, 281.
Dubois, Alphonse, notice of parts
XI and XII of his ' Synopsis
xVvium,' 321.
Duck, American Scaup, 165.
Black, 64.
Canvas-back, 278.
Harlequin, 278.
Hybrid, 209.
Lesser Scaup, 278,
Pintail, 164, 251, 278.
Red-legged, 226.
Ring-necked, 279.
Duck, Ruddy, 280.
Scaup, 278.
Shoveller, 164. 278.
Durfee, Owen, Massachusetts breed-
ing dates for Bartramia long-i-
Cauda, 65 ; another record of
Thryothorus ludovicianus in
Massachusetts, 69.
Dutcher, William, the Bam Owl on
Long Island, 67 ; Report of the
A. O. U. Committee on the Pro-
tection of North American Birds,
101-159; the Educational Leaflets
of the National Committee of
Audubon Societies, 248.
Dutcher, William, and W. L. Baily,
a contribution to the life history
of the Herring Gull {Larus
arg-entaius) in the United States,
D wight, Jonathan, Jr., capture of
the Barn Owl (Strix prattncola).
on Long Island, New York, 434 ;
some new records for Nova
Scotia, 439; formalin fails as an
insecticide for Dermestes, 440.
Eagle, Bald, 33, 264
Golden, 67, 183, 439.
Eaton, Elon Howard, an epidemic
of roup in the Canandaigua Crow-
Roost, 57-59 ; a hybrid Duck, 64.
Eclectus westermanni, 460.
Ectopistes migratorius, 66.
Edwards, Stanley W., Yellow-billed
Cuckoo*s egg in a Robin's nest,
68.
Egret, 119.
Egretta, 333.
candidissima, 333.
ruficoUis, 334.
Emberiza bairdii,
hyemalis, 258.
rostrata, 348.
sandwichensis, 347.
Emerald, Atala's, 290.
Empidonax acadicus, 169, 174.
difficilis, 206, 360.
hammondi, 185.
insulicola, 360.
trailli, 185.
trailli alnorum, 68, 282.
virescens, 174.
Eremophila b. leucolsema, 343.
Ereunetes pusillus, 22, 280.
Ergaticus ruber, 75.
Eribates, 451.
Vol. XXI
1903 J
Index.
467
Erismatura jamaicensis, 22, 204,
280.
Erolia, 337.
ferruginea, 337.
variegata, 337.
Eubates, 451.
Eulampis holosericeus, 23.
Euphonia sclateri, 14.
Falcator, 450.
Falco anatum anatum, 33.
columbarius, 23, 339.
columbarius richardsonii, 67,
364-
harrisi, 231.
peregrinus anatum, 23.
richardsonii, 364.
rupicolus, 339.
sparverius deserticolus, 103,
205,339- ^ ,
sparverius phaloena, 339.
Faxon, Walter, a rare work on
American ornithology, 236-241.
Felger, A. H., the Wood Ibis again
in Colorado, 65 ; birds killed by
hailstones, 70; hybrid duck —
Mallard {Anas boschas) + Pintail
{Dajila acuta), 303.
Finch, California Purple, 187.
Cassin's Purple, 187, 282.
House, 70, 167, 187.
Laysan, 384, 387-389.
Purple, 264.
San Clemente House, 33.
Fisher, A. K., notice of his * Par-
tial List of the Birds of Keam
Canyon, Arizona,' 318.
Fisher, Walter K., notice of his
description of a new Tern from
Neckar Island, 2^0 ; notes on
the birds peculiar to Laysan
Island, Hawaiian Group, 384-
396.
Fisher, William H., nesting of the
Red-bellied Woodpecker in Har-
ford County, Md., 305.
Fisher, William HubbcH, preserv-
ing equilibrium by the use of
one wing, 167-168.
Flamingo, 119.
Fleming, J. H., recent records of
the Wild Pigeon, 66; Turkey
Vulture at Moose Factory, James
Bay, 66; breeding of the Even-
ing Grosbeak in captivity, 213-
215-
Flicker, 254, 282.
Red-shafted, 184, 205, 282.
Florida, 334.
caerulea, 334.
Flycatcher, Alder, 68, 282.
Antillean Crested, 11.
Ash-throated, ^4.
Hammond's, 105.
Lower California, 342.
Olive-sided, 184.
Small-headed, 74.
Taylor's 10.
Traill's, 185.
Western Yellow-bellied, 206.
Fratercula arctica, 50.
Fregata, 323.
aquila, 285, 385.
Fringilla frontalis, 217.
melodia, 350.
meruloides, 221.
passerina, 349.
vespertina, 346.
savanna, 347.
Fulica americana, 22, 204, 280.
Fulmarus glacialis minor, 331.
Gadwall, 278.
Galeoscoptes carolinensis, 208, 284.
Gallinago delicata, 22, 280.
major, 364.
media, 364.
Gallinula, 167.
Gannet, Booby, 285.
Garzetta, 333.
candidissima, 22.
Gavia imber, 278.
Geospiza crassirostris, 41 x.
conirostris conirostris, 417.
fortis, 407.
fortis dubia, 417.
fortis fortis, 407.
fuliginosa, 407.
fuliginosa acutirostris, 408.
fuliginosa parvula, 408.
habeli, 417.
propinqua, 407.
prosthemelas, 417.
scandens, 407.
scandens fatigata, 409.
strenua, 407.
Geothlypis agilis, 266.
exigua, 75.
flavida, 75.
formosa, 439.
incompta, 75.
nelsoni microrhyncha, 75.
Philadelphia, 266.
468
Index,
TAuk
LOct.
Geothljrpis poliocephala, 355.
poliocephala ralphi, 75, 355.
tolmiei, 191.
trichas, 23, 76, 172, 178.
trichas arizela, 363.
trichas occidentalism 191, 208.
trichas scirpicola, 76, 363.
trichas sinuosa, 355.
Geotrygon chrysia, 339.
Gingala, 450.
Glaucidium gnoma, 183.
gnoma californicum, 281.
Gnatcatcher, Blue-gray, 69.
Golden-eye, American, 279.
Barrow's, 279.
Goldfinch, American, 206, 211.
Arizona, 222.
Arkansas, 188, 222.
Goose, Canada, 280, 439.
Emperor, 165.
Hawaiian, 167.
Hutchins's, 280.
White-fronted, 52.
Goshawk, American, 53.
Western, 183.
Grackle, Short-winged, 12.
Gracula quiscula, 256.
Grassquit, 14.
Bryant's, 14.
Grebe, HolboeH's, 278.
Horned, 278.
Pied-billed, 49, 279, 439.
Western, 50, 114, 279.
Green, Nat. S., Ohio notes, 70,
309-
Grinnell, J., and F. S. Daggett, an
ornithological visit to Los Car-
onados Islands, Lower Cali-
fornia, 27-37.
Grosbeak, Blnck-headed, 190.
California Pine, 187.
Evening, 213.
Porto Rico, 13.
Western Evening, 68, 187.
Grouse, Canadian Ruffed, 281.
Columbian Sharp-tailed, 204,
281.
Franklin's, 24, 281.
Gray Ruffed, 24, 2S1.
Richardson's, 24, 281.
Ruffed, 252.
Sooty, 182.
Grus americana, 252.
mexicana, 280.
Guara alba, 22.
Guillemot, Black, 130.
Gull, Black-backed, 132, 303.
Gull, Black-headed, 148.
Bonaparte's, 278.
Heermann's, 30.
Herring, 128, 129, 130, 132,
133, 417-431.
Laughing, 127, 136, 148.
Little, 52.
Sabine's, 433.
Western, 30.
Gygis alba kittlitzi, 385.
Gymnorhina tibicen, 444.
H^MATOPUs bachmani, 33, 36.
frazari, 29, 36.
nicer, 36.
palliatus, 36.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus, 264.
leucocephalus leucocephalus,
33'
Harelda hvemalis, 279.
Harvey, fcertrude Fay, the diary
of a Cardinal's nest, 54-57.
Hawk, Black, 269.
Cooper's, 183, 205.
Desert Sparrow, 183, 205.
Duck, 33.
Marsh, 205.
Swainson's, 44.
Red-shouldered, 269.
Red-tailed, 269.
Western Red-tailed, 183.
Western Sharp-shinned, 183.
Hazel-hen, 252.
Helcodytes brunneicapillus, 361.
brunneicapillus anthonyi,
367-
brunneicapillus bryanti, 361.
brunneicapillus couesi, 367.
Helinaia swainsoni, 438.
Heller, Edmund, see Snodgrass,
Robert Evans.
Helminthophila bachmani, 178.
celata, 283.
celata lutescens, 190.
cincinnatiensis, 74.
lawrencei, 50, 53, 74.
leucobronchialis, 74.
peregrina, 283.
rubricapilla gutturalis, 190.
Helmitheros, 355.
Helmintherus, 355.
swainsoni, 169, 171.
Helodromas solitarius cinnamom-
eus, 281.
Hen, Marsh, 147, 148.
Mud, 167.
Sage, 204.
Vol. XXl
«903 J
Index,
469
Hendrickson, W. F., a winter rec-
ord for the Chewink on Long
Island, N. Y., 216.
Ilenninger, W. F., Golden Eagle,
in middle southern Ohio, 67 ;
Barn Owl in northern Ohio, 67 ;
notice of his * Preliminary List
of the Birds of Middle Southern
Ohio.' 83.
Henshaw, H. W., review of his
* Birds of the Hawaiian Islands,^
80 ; occurrence of the Emperor
Goose in Hawaiia, 164-167.
Herodias, 333.
egretta, 333.
Heron, Black-crowned Night, 263.
Great Blue, 116.
Little Green, 49.
Night, 167.
Ward's, 332.
Hesperiphona, 346.
vespertina, 347.
vespertina montana, 347.
Hesperocichla naevia, 193.
Heteractitis incanus, 33.
Himantopus mexicanus, 22.
Himatione freethi, 384, 387, 389.
Hirundo bicolor, 354.
erythrogaster, 23, 209, 221,
363-
erythrogaster palmeri, 190,
363-
erythrogaster unalaschken-
sis, 221.
pelasgia, 260.
purpurea, 260.
riparia, 260.
rustica, 259.
tytleri, 221.
Histrionicus histrionicus, 279.
Hittock, 254.
Hoatzin, 228.
Hoffmann, Ralph, nesting of the
Goshawk in southern New
Hampshire, 211.
Holoquiscalus, 75.
Holub, Emil, obituary notice of,
92.
Honey-eater, Laysan, 384, 389.
Horizopus, 365.
Horton, Frances B., mortality of
Purple Martins (Progne purpu-
rea) at Brattleboro, Vt., 435.
Howe, Reginald Heber, Jr., a cor-
rection, 210; a further note on
the subspecies of Passerculus
saudzvichensis inhabiting Labra-
dor, 215 ; late records for eastern
Massachusetts, 218; Nighthawk
migration in New Hampshire,
434-
Howe, Reginald Heber, Jr., and
Edward Sturtevant, notice of their
revised list of the birds of Rhode
Island, 446.
Huhus, 450.
Hummingbird, Alice's, 290.
Allen^s, 282.
Anna, 184.
Blue-throated, 435.
Broad-tailed, 184.
Buff-breasted, 290.
Calliope, 282.
Ruby-throated, 253.
Rufous, 184.
Huntington, Dwight W., notice of
his * Our Feathered Game,* 443.
Hydranassa, 334.
tricolor ruficoUis, 22, 334.
Hydrochelidon nigra surinamensis,
22, 440.
Hylocichla alicse, 266.
aonalaschkse sequoiensis,
192.
aonalaschkae slevini, 368.
guttata nana, 79.
guttata pallasii, 284.
pallasii, 266.
ustulata, 192, 368.
ustulata cedica, 368.
ustulata swainsoni, 284.
Hylophilus, 447.
Ibis, Wood, 65, 119, 210.
Icteria virens, 266.
virens longicauda, 208.
Icterus audubonii, 75, 365.
bullocki, 206.
galbula, 440.
icterus, 12, 75, 292.
melanocephalus auduboni,
365-
portoricensis, 12.
xanthornus heliocides, 292.
lonornis martinica, 22.
Iridoprocne, 354.
bicolor, 354.
Jacana spinosa, 22.
Jacobs, J. Warren, notice of hit
* The Story of a Martin Colony,*
226.
Jay, Blue, 308.
Blue-fronted, 185.
47©
Index,
r Attk
LOct.
Jay, Couch's 345.
Johnson, W. S., Great Black-backed
Gull in Oneida County, N.Y., 303.
Junco annectens, 366.
caniceps, 366.
dorsalis, 366
hyemalis, 265.
hyemalis connectens, 366.
hyemalis pinosus, 366.
hyemalis thurberi. 189, 366.
mearnsi, 366.
oreganus pinosus, 366.
oreganus shufeldtl, 366.
oreganus thurberi, 366.
phaeonotus dorsalis, 366.
Junco, 265.
Sierra, 189.
Kenopia, 450.
Keyser, Leander, notice of his
' Birds of the Rockies,' 84.
Killdeer, 263, 281.
King, LeRoy, early record for the
Piping Plover (^./^gialitis me-
lodd) in Rhode Island, 305.
Kingbird, 206.
Arkansas, 206.
Gray, 10, 194.
Kingfisher, Belted, 171, 183, 205,
Kinglet, Ruby-crowned, 192, 218.
284.
Western Golden-crowned,
192.
Knight, Wilber C, notice of his
•The Birds of Wyoming,' 82;
obituary of, 457.
Knox, J. C., some suggestions, 234.
Kopman, H. H., Louisiana migra-
tion notes, 309.
Kumlien, Ludwig, obituary notice
of, 93-
Lagopus leucurus, 281.
leucurus peninsulciris, 364.
Lampornis viridis, 23.
Lanius ludovicianus, 361.
ludovicianus anthonyi, 361.
ludovicianus excubitorides,
208, 361.
ludovicianus gambeli, 361.
ludovicianus migrans, 367,
439-
Lark, California Horned, 344.
Desert Horned, 343.
Dusky Horned, 185, 206, 282.
Hoyt's Horned, 344.
Island Horned, 345.
Lark, Montezuma Horned, 344.
Pallid Horned, 282, 343.
Larus argentatus, 363. 417.
crepidatus, 449.
glaucescens, 165.
heermanni, 30.
marinus, 303.
minutus, 50, 52.
occidentalis, 30.
Philadelphia, 226, 278.
vcgae, 363.
Laysan Island, birds of, 384-402.
Leptotila brachyptera, 364.
f ulviventris brachyptera, 364.
Leucosticte tephrocotis, 187, 282.
tephrocotis littoralis, 282.
Leucosticte, Gray-crowned, 187, 282.
Hepburn's, 282.
Limosa fedoa, 22.
Loomis, Leverett Mills, recognition
of geographic variation in nomen-
clature, 294-299.
Loon, 278.
Lophodytes cucullatus, 278.
Lophophanes, 308, 357.
cristatus, 30)3.
dichrous, 308.
inornatus cineraceus, 358.
inornatus griseus, 358.
woUweberi, 358.
Loxia cardinalis, 257.
curvirostra bendirei, 187,365.
curvirostra minor, 264.
frontalis, 218.
Loxigilla portoricensis, 13.
Luscineola mimica, 324.
Mack AY, George H., Woodcock
notes, 210.
Macoun, John, notice of his 'Cata-
logue of Canadian Birds,' Part
II, 4|i.
Madarazs, Julius, notice of his
Birds of Hungary, 322.
Magpie, American, 1S5, 206.
Maize-thieves, 256, 257.
Purple, 257.
While-backed, 257.
Mallard, 64, 210, 278, 303.
Manacus candei, 324.
Manakin, Lance-tailed, 291.
Mareca americana, 22, 278.
penelope, 210, 225, 303.
Margarops fuscatus, 20, 177.
Martin, Purple, 226, 260, 265, 435.
Sand, 260, 435.
West Indian, 15.
Vol. XXl
ton J
Index,
471
Maxon, William R., notes on the
birds of Madison County, New
York, with especial reference to
Em body's recent list, 262-266.
McGregor, Richard C. notice of
*A List of Birds collected in
Norton Sound, Alaska, 319;
notice of his papers on various
Philippine birds, 319.
Mcllwraith Ornithological Club,
98.
Mcllwraith, Thomas, obituary
notice of, 242. *
McKechnie, Fred. B., a late fall
record for the Cape May Warbler
(Dendroica tigrina) in eastern
Massachusetts, 218.
Meadowlark, 248.
Southern, 345.
Western, 186, 206.
Mearns, Louis di Zerega, the Louis-
iana Water-thrush in Minnesota,
307-
Megascops, 275.
xantusi, 79, 341.
Megaquiscalis, 451.
Megaquiscalus, 75, 346, 451.
major, 346.
major macrourus, 346.
Melanerpes angustifrons, 365.
carolinus, 255, 264, 305.
erythrocephalus, 70, 255.
formicivorus angustifrons,
79» 365-
portoricensis, 193.
subelegans, 290.
superciliaris, 194.
torquatus, 184, 205.
Melanopteryx, 450.
Meleagris gallopavo fera, 338.
gallopavo intermedia, 364.
gallopavo merriami, 364.
gallopavo silvestris, 339.
silvestris, 338.
Melospiza cinerea, 298, 350, 362.
cinerea caurina, 352.
cinerea clementae, 37, 351.
cinerea cooperi, 352, 363.
cinerea failax, 350.
cinerea gouldi, 362.
cinerea graminea, 351.
cinerea heermanni, 350.
cinerea insignis, 353.
cinerea juddi, 352.
cinerea kenaiensis, 353.
cinerea melodia, 350.
cinerea merrilli, 352, 362.
Melospiza cinerea montana, 189,350.
cinerea morphna, 351.
cinerea phaea, 366.
cinerea pusillula, 352.
cinerea rivularis, 351.
cinerea rufina, 351.
cinerea samuelis, 351, 362.
coronatorum, 34, 37, 366.
fasciata caurina, 353.
fasciata elemental, 351.
fasciata cooperi, 352.
fasciata graminea, 351.
fasciata ingersolli, 362
fasciata juddi, 352.
fasciata merrilli, 352.
fasciata montana, 350.
fasciata pusillula, 352.
heermanni, 350.
insignis, 353.
lincolni, 189, 265.
lincolni striata, 283.
melodia, 350.
melodia kenaiensis, 353.
melodia montana, 207.
melodia morphna, 351.
melodia santxcrucis, 362.
melodia sanaka, 362.
Merganser americanus, 278.
serrator, 165.
Merganser, American, 278.
Hooded, 278.
Red -breasted, 165.
Merlin, Richardson's 67.
Merrill, James Gushing, notice of
death of, 90.
Merula migratoria propinqua, 193,
209.
Micranous hawaiiensis, 385.
Michigan Ornithological Club, or-
ganization of, 244.
Micropalama himantopus, 22, 65,
440.
Micropallas whitnevi, 43.
Miller, W. D. W., breeding of the
Alder Flycatcher (Empidouax
traillii alnorutn) near Plainfield,
N.J., 68.
Mimidae, 367.
Miminx, 367.
Mimocichla ardosiacea, 20.
Mimus caudatus, 295.
polyglottos, 53. 295, 440.
polyglottos leucopterus, 295.
polyglottos orpheus, 19.
polyglottos polyglottos, 295.
polyglottos var. caudatus, 295.
Miserythrus, 45a
472
Index,
FAiik
LOct.
Mniotilta varia, 17, 170, 178, 265.
Moa, eggs of, 330.
Mockingbird, 53, 260, 440.
West Indian, 19.
Mogridge, Mrs. £. S., obituary
notice of, 327.
Morris, Robert O., Springfield,
Mass., bird notes, 439.
Motacilla caerulea, 217.
cyanea, 449.
sialis, 261.
Mudge, Geo. P., notice of his
* Myology of the Tongues of
Parrots/ etc., 310.
Murres, Brtinnich's, ^i.
Muscicapa carolinensis, 261.
minuta, 74.
Myadestes townsendi, 192.
Myiarchus antillaruin, xx, 194.
cinerascens, 44, 79.
cinerascens pertinax, 342.-
pertinax, 342.
crinitus residuus, 365.
Nannopterum, 323.
Nebraska Ornithologist's Union,
notice of the Proceedings of the
Third Annual Meeting, 317 ;
notice of Fourth Annual Meet-
ing. 329-
Nesospingus speculiferus, 14.
Nettion carolinensis, 209, 278.
crecca, 209.
New York Zoological Society,
Seventh Annual Report of, 330.
Nighthawk, 1S4, 248, 264, 434.
Bahaman, 431-433.
Western, 206.
Noddy, 385.
North, Alfred J., notice of his
* Nests and Eggs of Birds found
Breeding in Australia and New
Zealand,' 321.
Nucifraga columbiana, 185.
Numenius borealis, 22.
hudsonicus, 22, 33.
longirostris, 281.
Nutcracker, Clark's, 180, 185.
Nuthatch, Pygmy, 192.
Red-breasted, 192.
Rocky Mountain, 357.
Saint Lucas, 357.
Slender-billed, 192.
Nuttall, Thomas, notice of the " new
revised and annotated edition "of
his ' A Popular Handbook of the
Birds of the United States and
Canada,' 314.
Nuttallornis, 343.
borealis, 343.
Nyctala, 364.
acadica, X83.
tengmalmi richardsoni, 28x^
305* 433-
Nyctalops, 274.
accipitrinus, 275.
wilsonianus, 275.
Nyctanassa, 335.
violacea, 335.
Nyctiardea violacea, 174.
Nycticorax naerius, 22, 448.
nycticorax ntevius, 263.
Oberholser, Harry C, a review of
the genus Catkerpest 196-198; a
synopsis of the genus Psaltri-
paruSf 198-201 ; notice of his
papers on new birds from Texas,
447.
Oceanites oceanicus, 65, 250.
Oceanodroma fuliginosa, 386.
leucorhoa, 250.
melania 30, 36.
socorroensis, 3i» 36.
Ochthodromus, 338.
wilsonius, 338.
Oidemia deglandi, 280.
perspicillata, 280.
Olor, 359.
buccinator, 280.
columbianus, 52.
Oporonis, 75.
agilis, 172.
Oreortyx pictus plumiferus, 182.
Oreospiza chlorura, 190.
Oriole, Baltimore, 70, 440.
Bullock's 206.
Margaritan, 292.
Porto Rico, 12.
Oriolus phoeniceus, 257.
Oroscoptes montanus, 208.
Orpheus leucopterus, 295.
Ortholophus, 324.
Ortyx capistratus, 239.
Osprey, The, notice of Vol. I, new
series, 451.
Otocoris alpestris, 236.
alpestris actia, 344.
alpestris ammophila, 362.
alpestris aphrasta, 365.
alpestris arcticola, 343.
alpestris arenicola, 343.
alpestris chrysolsea, 344.
alpestris enthymia, 362.
alpestris hoyti, 344.
alpestris insularis, 345.
alpestris leucansiptila, 362.
Vol. XX
1903
]
Index,
473
Otocoris alpestris leucolsema, 282,
343.
alpestris merrillii, 185, 206,
282.
alpestris occidentalism 344.
Otus, 273.
asio, 275.
asio aikeni, 275.
asio bendirei, 275.
asio cineraceus, 275.
asio floridanus, 275.
asio kennicottii, 275.
asio macfarlanei, 275.
asio maxwellix, 275.
asio mccalli, 275.
bakkamoena, 273.
flanimeola, 275.
flammeola idahoensis, 275.
trichopsis, 275.
Oven-bird, 19.
Owl, American Long-eared, 205.
Barn, 67, 212, 434.
Barred, 340.
Burrowing, 205, 288.
California Pj^gmv, 281.
Dusky Horned, 183.
Dwarf Horned, 341.
Elf, 43.
Great Gray, 340.
Pjgmy, 183.
Richardson's, 281, 305, 433.
Saw-whet, 183.
Short-eared, 212.
Western Horned, 205.
Xantus's Screech, 341.
Oxyechus, 337.
vociferus, 337.
Oxyporus, 450.
Oyster-catcher, Black, 33.
Frazar's, 33.
Pachysylvia, 447.
Palxonornis, 450.
Parrot, Amazonian, 289.
Partridge, Painted, 182.
Virginia, 252.
Parula americana, 171, 178.
Parus atricapillus, 236.
atricapillus occidentalis, 208.
atricristatus, 358.
bicolor, 357, 358.
bicolor texensis, 358.
cristatus, 357.
gambeli, 192.
hudsonicus evura, 367.
hudsonicus littoralis, 367.
hudsonicus stoneyi, 367.
Parus, inornatus, 358.
melanotis, 199.
minimus, 200.
Passer domesticus, 306.
nivalis, 258.
Passerculus, 215, 347.
alaudinus, 348.
beldingi, 348.
guttatus, 348.
princeps, 347.
rostratus, 340.
rostratus guttatus, 348.
rostratus var. guttatus, 348.
rostratus halophilus, 348.
rostratus sanctorum, 349.
sanctorum, 349.
sandwichensis, 215, 347.
sandwichensis alaudinus, 348.
sandwichensis 7. alaudinus,
348.
sandwichensis bryanti, 348.
sandwichensis savanna, 347.
Passerella, 221.
iliaca, 218.
iliaca annectens, 221, 366.
iliaca fuliginosa, 366.
iliaca insularis, 366.
iliaca megarhynca, 189.
iliaca meruloides, 366.
iliaca townsendi, 366.
iliaca unalaschensis, 189.
rufina, 351.
Paulomagus, 446.
Pedioecetes phasianellus colum*
bianus, 204, 281.
Pelican, American White, 48.
Brown, 121, 285.
California Brown, 32.
Pelecanus, 323.
calif ornicus, 32, 36, 363.
erythrorhynchus, 48.
fuscus, 285.
fuscus call fornicus, '363.
occidentalis, 363.
Pelidna, 337.
alpina, 337.
alpina pacifica, 337.
pacifica, 337.
Penelopides, 324.
Percnopterus, 451.
Pcrcnoptcrus, 451.
Perisoreus canadensis, 361.
canadensis fumifrons, 360.
canadensis nigricapillus, 361.
canadensis obscurus, 361.
obscurus, 361.
obscurus griseus, 361.
Petrel, Black, 30, 63.
474
Index,
fAuk
LOct.
Petrel, Bonin, 386.
Leaches, 250.
Socorro, 3i» 63.
Sooty, 386.
Wilson's, 65, 250.
Petrochelidon fulva, 15.
lunifrons, 190, 207.
lunifrons tachina, 447.
Feucedramus, 75.
Pewee, Western Wood, 184.
Phaeopharus, 450.
Pha^thon, 323.
sethereus, 22.
rubricaudus, 385.
Phalacrocorax, 323.
auritus, 363.
auritus albociliatus, 32.
bicristatus, 359.
dilophus, 363.
mexicanus, 363.
pelagicus, 359.
pelagicus robustus, 359.
penicillatus, 32, 36.
resplendens, 359.
urile, 359.
vigua mexicanus, 363.
Phalaenoptilus nuttallii, 205.
nuttallii californicus, 184.
Phalarope, Northern, 280.
Phalaropus lobatus, 280.
PhaleriniE. 363.
Phaleris, 359.
Philacte canagica, 165-167.
Philohela minor, 210.
Phoebe, Say's, 206.
Phcenicothraupis rubica nelsoni,
75-
Pica hudsonica, 185, 206.
pica hudsonia, 345.
pica hudsonica, 345.
Picicorvus, 361.
Picoides americaniis, 282.
arcticus, 282.
arcticus tenuirostris, 365.
lenuirostris, 1S4.
Picus aurifrons, 342.
carolinus, 342.
harrisi, 231.
pileatus, 253.
torquatus, 341.
tiirati, 221, 341.
Pigeon, 66.
Wild, 66, 252.
Pinaroloxias inornata. 232.
Pinicola californica. 1S7.
Pintail, 164. 278, 303.
Pipilo albigiila, 366.
Pipilo crissalis, 366.
crissalis carolae, 366.
crissalis senicula, 366.
erythrophthalmus, 216, 236,
265.
fuscus albigula, 366.
fuscus carolae, 367.
fuscus crissalis, 366.
fuscus senicula, 366.
maculatus var. ? 207.
maculatus atratus, 366.
maculatus megalonyx, 366.
Pipilo, Abert's, 48.
Piranga ludoviciana, 190, 207.
rubra, 169, 173.
rubriceps, 75, 354.
Pitangus taylori, 10, 194.
Pitta angolensis, 324.
pulith, 334.
Piut, 254.
Platycercus, 311.
Plegadis autumnalis, 32.
Plover, American Golden, 381.
Black-bellied, 381.
Piping, 305.
Snowy, 433.
Podasocys, 338.
montanus, 338.
Podicipidae, 363.
Podilvmbus podiceps, 278, 439.
Pcecilonetta bahamensis, 22.
Polioptila, 217, 390.
cserulea, 69.
Pomarinus, 450.
Pooecetes gramineus, 283.
gramineus confinis, 207.
Poor- will, 205.
Porphyrio martinica, 169, 175, 179.
Porzana Carolina, 22, 175, 177, 280.
coturniculus, 364.
flaviventris, 22.
jamaicensis, 22.
Porzanula, 38S.
palmeri, 384, 392.
Proceliaria pelagica, 250.
puffinus, 250.
Procelsterna saxatalis, 230.
Progne dominicensis, 15.
purpurea, 435.
subis, 265, 363.
subis floridana, 363.
Psaltria plumbea, 200.
Psaltriparus, 198.
grindie, 201, 368.
melanotis iulus, 199.
melanotis lloydi, 199.
melanotis melanotis, 199.
Vol. XXl
1903 J
Index.
475
Psaltriparus minimus, 362.
minimus californicus, 201,
363.
minimus grindae, 368.
minimus minimus, 200.
personatus, 199.
plumbeus, 2cx).
santaritx, 199.
Psaltrites, 199.
helviventris, 199.
Psittacula modesta, 213.
modesta sclateri, 213.
sclateri, 213.
Ptarmigan, 252.
Rock, 281.
White-tailed, 281.
Ptiliogonatids, 367.
Ptiliogonatinse, 367.
Ptychoramphus aleuticus, 30.
Publications received, 89, 232, 324,
453.
Puffbird. Two-banded, 289.
Puffin, 50, 131.
Puffinus bulleri, 332.
cuneatus, 332, 386.
f uliginosus, 250, 363.
griseus, 363.
major, 250.
nativitatis, 386.
puffinus, 250.
Pycraft, W. P., notice of his 'The
Significance of the Condition of
Young Birds at Birth,' 227.
Pyrrhomitris cucullata, 23.
Pyrrhulopsis, 311.
QuERquEDULA discors, 22, 278.
Quiscalus brachvpterus, X2.
macrourus, 346.
major, 346.
Rail, Clapper, 137.
King, 304.
Laysan, 384, 392-396.
Sora, 280.
Virginia, 280.
Rallus ecaudatus, 449.
elegans, 304.
levipes, 363.
virginianus, 280.
Raven, American, 33.
Ray, Slilton S., a list of the land
birds of Lake Vallev, Central
Sierra Nevada Mountains, Cali-
fornia, 1 80- 193.
Ready, George II., obituary notice
of, '327.
Reagh, Arthur Lincoln, the King
Rail in Pij-mouth County, Mass.,
304-
Red-bird, 257.
Redhead, 278.
Redpoll, Hoary, 282.
Redstart, American, 19, 208, 284,
3091 310-
Regulus calendula, 192, 218, 284.
satrapa oiivaceus, 192.
Rhoads, S. N., Auduboniana, 377-
383-
Rhodinocincla rosea eximea, 75.
Richmond, Charles W., notice of
paper by on birds from the
Andaman and Nicobar Islands,
229; notice of paper by on birds
from the coast and islands of
Northwest Sumatra, 230;
Ridgway, Robert, review of his
'Birds of North and Middle
America,' Part II, 73-76 ; Lopka-
phanes vs. Btsolopkus, 308.
Riley, J. H., a new subspecies of
Nighthawk from the Bahama
Islands, 431-433 ; the Snowy
Plover in the Bahamas, 433 ;
the second known specimen of
Centurus nyeannSy 434.
Riparia riparia, 23, 436.
Robin, 248, 261.
Western, 193, 209.
Robin-redbreast, 261.
Sage, John H., Twentieth Con-
gress of the American Ornithol-
ogists' Union, 59-63.
Salpinctes obsoletus, 33, 208.
obsoletus pulverius, 367.
pulverius, 367.
Sanderling, 280.
Sandpiper, Baird's, 2S0.
Bartramian, 65, 281.
Least, 280.
Pectoral, 280.
Saint Lucas, 354.
Semipalmated. 280.
Spotted, 33, 281.
Stilt, 65. 440.
Western Solitary, 281.
Sanford,' L. C, and L. B. Bishop
and T. S. Van Dvke, notice of
their * The Water-Fowl Family,'
313-
Sapsucker, Red-naped, 2S2.
Williamson's, 184.
Yellow-bellied, 264.
476
Index.
FAttk
LOct.
Sayornis nigricans, 365.
nigricans semiatra, 79, 365.
saya, 206.
Scolecophaeus cyanocephalus, 186,
300.
Scotiaptex cinerea, 340.
nebulosa, 340.
nebulosa lapponica, 340.
nebulosum, 340.
Scotothorus veraepacis, 324.
Scops, 273.
Scopus, 273.
Scoter, Surf, 280.
White-winged, 280.
Scott, William Earl Dodge, notice
of his *The Storjr of a Bird
Lover,' 315.
Seaman, Ernest, balancing with
one wing, 308.
Seed-eater, Morellet's, 353.
Seiurus aurocapillus, 19, 172.
motacilla, 19, 172, 307.
noveboracensis, 19, 172.
noveboracensis notabilis, 284.
Selasphorus alleni, 282.
platycercus, 184.
rufus, 184.
Seth-Smith, David, notice of his
* Parrakeets : being a Practical
Handbook to those Species kept
in Captivity,' 323.
Setophaga, 75.
miniata, 75.
ruticilla, 19, 173, 208, 284.
Shearwater, Christmas Island, 386.
Greater, 250.
Manx, 250.
New Zealand, 332.
Sooty, 250.
Wedge-tailed, 332, 386.
Sherborn, Charles D., notice of
his * Index Animalium,' 448-450.
Shoveller, 164, 278.
Shrike, Migrant, 439.
White-rum ped, 208.
Shufeldt, R. W., notice of his
papers on the Steganopodes, and
on the Classification of certain
Groups of Birds, 323.
Sialia arctica, 193, 209.
sialis, 70.
sialis grata, 368.
Simons, Perry O., obituary notice
of, 94.
Simorhynchinip, 363.
Siskin, Pine, 188.
Sitta canadensis, IQ2.
Sitta carolinensis aculeata, 192.
carolinensis lagunse, 357.
q^olinensis nelsoni, 357.
pygmaea, 192.
syriaca, 225.
Sittidae, 367.
Sittinae, 367.
Slevin, Thomas Edwards, obituary
notice of, 326.
Smith, Horace G., Bell's Vireo
( Vireo del/it) in Colorado, 438.
Snipe, Wilson's, 280.
Snodgrass, Robert E., a list of land
birds from Central Washington,
202-209; notes on the anatomy
of Geosptza, CocorniSt and Cer-
thideoy 402-417.
Snodgrass, Robert Evans, and Ed-
mund Heller, notice of their
paper on * The Birds of Clipper-
ton and Cocos Islands,' 81.
Snow, Francis H., notice of his * A
Catalogue of the Birds of Kan-
sas' (fifth ed.), 317.
Snowbird, 258.
Solitaire, Townsend's, 192.
Sora, 280.
Sparrow, Alameda Song, 352.
Brewer's, 189, 207.
Coronados Song, 34.
English, 70, 306, 309.
Florida Grasshopper, 350.
Forbush's, 283.
Fox, 218.
Grasshopper, 264.
House, 306.
Intermediate, 188.
Kenai Song, 353.
Lark, 440.
Lincoln's, 189, 265.
Monterey Fox, 221.
Mountain Song, 189, 207.
Sage, 207.
San Diego, 352.
Savanna, 283.
Thick-billed, 189.
Townsend, 189.
Vesper, 283.
Western Chipping, 188.
Western Lark, 207.
Western Tree, 283.
Western Vesper, 207.
West Indian Grasshopper,
13-
White-crowned, 188.
White-throated, 265.
Spatula clypeata, 22, 164, 278.
Vol. XX"]
Index.
^n
Speotyto cunicularia becki, 365.
cunicularia hypogsea bra-
chyptera, 288.
Spermestes cucullatus, 13.
Spermophila morclleti, 353.
Sphyrapicus thyroldcus, 184.
varius, 174, 255, 264.
varius nuchalis, 282.
Spindalis portoricensis, 14.
Spinney, Herbert L., the Stilt Sand-
piper in Knox Countv, Maine,
6s-
Spinus pinu8, 188.
Spiza americana, 440.
Spizella atrigularis, 447.
breweri, 189, 207, 283.
monticola ochracea, 283.
socialis arizonse, 188.
Spoonbill, Roseate, 119.
Sporseginthus melpoda, 13.
Sporophilamorelleti, 353.
morelleti sharpei, 353.
Squatarola helvetica, 22.
squatarola, 281.
Stare, Red-winged, 256.
Stelgidopteryx serripennis, 265.
Stellula calliope, 282.
Sterna acuflavida, 175.
antillarum, 175.
cantiaca, 175.
dougalli, 21, 275.
forsteri, 32.
fuliginosa, 175, 179, 292,385.
lunata, 385.
maxima, 21.
regia, 219.
sandvicensis acuflavida, 21.
Stcrcorarius cepphus, 359.
longicaudus, 359.
parasiticus, 359.
Stilt, Black-necked, 115.
Hawaiian 167.
Stone, Witmer. a hybrid Duck,
Anas boschas X Net Hon carolin-
ensia^ 209; notes on winter Crow
life in the Delaware Valley, 267-
271 ; on the generic names of the
North American Owls, 272-276;
notice of his paper on a collection
of birds from Sumatra, 318; no-
tice of his paper on birds from
southern New Mexico and west-
ern Texas, 447.
Strepsilas interpres, 174.
Strigidaj, 360.
Striker, Big, 148.
Little, 148.
Stringops, 311.
Strix, 272, 360.
aluco, 272.
arctica, 274.
asio, 272. *
bakkamoena, 273.
bubo, 272, 274.
flammea, 272.
funera, 272.
lapponica, 340.
nebulosa, 340.
nebulosa alien i, 340.
nyctea, 272.
otus, 272.
passerina, 272.
pratincola, 69, 212, 434.
scandiaca, 272.
scops, 272.
stridula, 272.
ulula, 272.
varius, 340.
Strong, R. M., review of his paper
on *Thc Development of Color
in the Definitive Feather,' 86-
88 ; notice of paper by, on * A
Case of Abnormal Plumage,' 228.
Sturnella, 76.
magna argutula, 345.
magna hoopesi, 361.
magna mexicana, 361.
magna neglecta, 186, 206, 365.
neglecia, 365.
Sturtevant, Edward, see Howe,
Reginald Heber, Jr. .
Sula, 323.
cyanops, 385.
piscator, 287, 385.
sula, 285.
Surnia ulula, 364.
ulula doliata, 364.
Swallow, Barn, 207, 259.
Chimney, 259.
Cliff, 19b, 207.
Cuban Cliff, 15.
Ground, 260.
House, 259.
Northern Violet-green, 208.
Rough-winged, 265.
Sand, 436.
Tree, 190.
Violet-green, 190.
Western Barn, 190.
Swan, Trumpeter, 280.
Whistling, 52.
Swift, Black, 282.'
Chimney, 259.
Sylvia agilis, 383.
478
IfuieK,
fAuk
LOct.
Svlvia cxrulea* 216.
carbonata, 74.
montana, 74,361.
Philadelphia, 383.
* rara, 216.
Svlvania mitrata, 169, 173.
Svmphemia semipalmata, 22.
Svrnium nebulosum, 340.
nebulosum helveolum, 340.
varium, 340.
varium alleni, 340.
varium helveolum, 340.
Tachycineta bicolor, 23, 190.
thalassina, 190.
thalassina brachyptera, 79,
354-
thalassina lepida, 208.
Tanager, Black-winged Palm, 398-
402.
Louisiana, 207.
Western, 190.
Tnnagra palmarum, 398.
palmarum melanoptera, 398-
402.
palmarum palmarum, 398.
Tantalus loculator, 65, 210.
Tapera, 450.
Tartare, 391.
aequinoctialis, 391.
familiaris, 391.
longirostris, 391.
luscinia, 391.
mendanae, 391.
pistor, 391.
rehsei, 391.
syrinx, 391.
Tatler, Wandering, 33.
Teal, Blue-winged, 278.
Cinnamon, 278.
Green-winged, 209, 27S.
Laysan, 384, 396.
Telespiza cantans, 384, 387.
Telmatodytes, 356.
marianai, 357.
palustris, 356.
palustris griseus, 356.
palustris paludicola, 356.
palustris plesius, 357.
Tern, Arctic, 127, 131.
Black, 134, 440.
Common, 127, 131.
Forster's, 32.
Grayback, 385.
Least, 149.
Noddy, 385.
Royal, 149, 219.
Tern, Sootv, 292, 385.
White, 385.
Tetrao lagopus, 252.
Thamnophilus doliatus, 291.
Thrasher, Brown, 266.
Sage, 208.
Thrush, Gray-cheeked, 266.
Hermit, 266, 284.
Olive-backed, 285.
Russet-backed, 192.
Sierra Hermit, 192.
Varied, 193.
Thryothorus guttulatus, 196.
ludovicianus, 69.
mexicanus, 196.
murarius, 196.
Tiaris bicolor omissa, 14.
olivacea bryanti, 14.
Tinnunculus, 339.
phalcena, 339.
Todus multicolor, 225.
Torrey, Bradford, Sand Swallows
nesting in sawdust, 436.
Tetanus acuminatus, 336.
damacensis, 336.
melanoleucus, 22, 281.
melanoleucus frazari, 19, 364.
Towhee, 265.
Green-tailed, 190.
Townsend, Charles W., a case of
mistaken diagnosis, 218.
Toxostoma rufum, 266.
Trichas, 383.
Trichoglossus, 310.
Tringa alpina, 337.
bairdi, 280.
couesi, 314.
ferruginea, 337.
fuscicollis, 336.
maculata, 204, 280, 336.
maritima, 335.
minuta, 335.
minutilla, 280, 336.
ptilocnemis, 314, 335.
Tringoides macularius, 174.
Trochilus alexandri, 220.
colubris, 23, 253.
Troglodytes aSdon parkmani, 192.
Trotter, Spencer, notes on the orni-
thological observations of Peter
Kalm, 249-262.
Troupial, 12, 292.
Trowbridge, C C, notice of his
paper on *The Relation of Wind
to Bird Migration,' 228.
Turdus fuscescens, 170.
migratorius, 261.
Vol. XX "1
Index,
479
Turdus minor cinereo-albus non
maculatus, 294.
Tnustelinu8» 170.
poljglottos, 260, 295.
Turnstone, 167, 210.
Black, 33.
Turtur humilis, 228.
risorius, 22S.
Tyrannus, 170.
borealis, 343.
dominicensis, 10, 194.
griseus, 173.
tyrannus, 23, 206.
verticalis, 206.
Uria lomvia, 51.
Van Dyke, T. S., see Sanford, L. C.
Vermont Bird Club, second annual
meeting of, 244.
Vireo bellii, 438.
bellii medius, 447.
calidris, 177, 193, 194.
calidris barbatula, 16.
crassirostris, 173.
flavifrons, 173, 265.
gilvus swainsoni, 79, 190, 354.
latimeri, 16, 194.
olivaceus, 23, 370.
philadelphicus, 369-376.
solitarius, 265, 437.
solitarius cassint, 190.
swainsoni, 354.
Vireo, Bell's, 438. *
Black-whiskered, 16.
Blue-headed, 265.
Cassin, 190.
Philadelphia, 369-376.
Red-eyed, 372.
Solitary, 372, 437.
Warbling, 372.
Western Warbling, 190, 354.
Yellow-throated, 265, 437.
Vireosylvia josephse, 324.
Vulture, Black, 67, 2S7.
Turkey, 53, 66, 183, 205.
Walter, Herbert Eugene, and
Alice Hall Walter, notice of
their * Wild Birds in City Parks,
316.
Warbler, Adelaid, 18.
Alaska Myrtle, 191.
Audubon's, 191, 284.
Bay-breasted, 309.
Black-and-white, 17, 195, 265.
Blackburnian, 265.
Warbler, Black-poll, 284.
Black-throated Green, 266,
309* 3»o-
Calaveras, 190.
Canadian, 266.
Cape May, 18, 218.
Cerulean, 265.
Connecticut, 266.
Golden Pileolated, 356.
Hermit, 191.
Hooded, 266, 438.
Kentucky, 439.
Kirtland's, 225, 459.
Lawrence's, 53.
Lutescent, 190.
Magnolia, 18. 284, 309, 310.
Mourning, 266.
Myrtle, 18, 195.
Orange-crowned, 283.
Palm, 18, 195, 266.
Parula, 18, 195.
Pileolated, 191.
Porto Rico Yellow, 18.
Prairie, 19, 195.
Sonora Yellow, 47.
Swain son's, 438.
Tennessee, 203, 309, 310.
Tolmie's, 191.
Townsend's, 191.
Western Yellow, 191.
Yellow, 208.
Warbler, The, notice of initial
number of, 244.
Waterhouse, Charles Owen, notice
of his * Index Zoologicus,* 450.
Waters, Edward Stanley, obituary
notice of, 243.
Water-Thrush, 19.
Grinnell's, 284.
Louisiana. IQ, 307.
Waxwing, Bohemian, 283.
Cedar, 283.
Wavne, Arthur T., Richardson^s
Merlin {Falco colnmbarius rich-
ardsoni) on the coast of South
Carolina, 67.
\Veed, Clarence M., notice of his
* A Partial Bibliography of the
Economic Relations of North
American Birds,* 446.
Wheelock, Irene Grosvenor, notice
of her * Nestlings of Forest and
Marsh,* 231.
Whipperiwhip, 253.
Whipperiwill, 253.
Whip-poor-will, 253, 264.
Widgeon, 303.
48(
Judex,
FAak
LOci.
Widgeon, European, 210, 303.
Willet, 147, 148.
Wilson Bulletin, The, review of
Volume IX, new series, 225.
Wilsonia canadensis, 266.
microcephala, 74.
mitrata, 266, 438.
pusilla, 218.
pusilla chrvseola, 75, 356.
pusilla pileolata, 191.
Winkenwerder, H. A., notice of his
*The Migration of Birds, with
special reference to Nocturnal
Flights,' 311.
Woodcock, American, 210.
Woodpecker, American Three-toed,
282.
Arctic Three-toed, 282.
Batchelder's, 282.
Black, 253.
Bonaparte*s, 290.
Cabanis's, 183, 281.
Gila, 44.
Gold-winged, 254.
Hairy, 264.
Ivory-billed, 254.
Lewis's, 184, 205.
Northern Hairy, 281.
Northern Pileated, 184.
Pileated, 254, 282.
Red-headed, 70, 255, 309.
Red-bellied, 264, 305.
Sierra Three-toed, 184.
Southern Wiiite-headed, 222.
Woodpecker, White-headed, 183.
Willow, 341.
Wren, Carolina, 69.
Rock, 33, 208.
Western Marsh, 208.
Xaxthocbphalus xanthocephalus,
186, 206, 282.
Xema sabinii, 433.
Xenopicus albolarvatus, 183.
gravirostris, 222, 362.
Xiphidiopicus percussus, 194.
Yellow-legs, Greater, 281.
Yellow-throat,'Rio Grande, 355.
Salt Marsh, 355.
Western, 191, 208.
Young, Curtis Clay, obituary
notice of, 94.
Zamelodia melanocephala, 190,
416.
Zenaidura carolinensis, 324.
macroura, 66, 177, 182, 205,
263, 281.
Zonotrichia albicoUis, 265.
fallax, 350.
leucophrys, 188.
leucophrys gambeli, 36, 188.
leucophrys intermedia, 36.
Zoological Quarterly, The, notice of,
32S.
ERRATA.
Page 69, line 16, iov phryothorus read Thryothorus.
Page 81, line i, for Gadou read Gadow.
Page 103, for Plate HI read Plate IV.»
Page 109, footnote, for 1902 read 1901.
Page no, for Plate IV read Plate ni.^
Page 172, line 9 from bottom, for Oporonis read Oporomis.
Page 213, line 7, for Psitacula and Psitacula read, Psittacula and
Psittacula.
Page 435, line 1 1 from bottom, ior purpurea read subi>.
^ See p. 246, footnote, for fuller explanation.
CONTENTS.
Konsun niB ttlan I'mi'U*" m Ijv»»« lui....
Alifar. inhuiXlt-XYJ.I
Nurci >H Ilia Anniaiit ar (fn^*^, Gawnfi UEb ChWUf '
tl'imm XVir-XX-) ..._!._
njt ft nm.
Ktiui^ lu> Von !wtU. in i V'lnaa^Iii V.ilt •* ui^tiM-urbh, t.n
r»t iiiij Ntwt,— Tlif'r»miftnii Ci>iicr"«nl di« A'''"'l"in('"ii''"Jln»*»' I'lain, (ttl'-'l
. ^.... ... \v'„|J'„,.jy^ Anuiol HmUiw ulOicBiUiili'nnlllmludiu'VUun, ie>
Omtini, CuMuiT-
• AiKnciV l>»iTnat^«*«n' Cnuia, igirtnt^
■THE AUK,' publtihei an the Organ nf the A»iiuuc*» ORMTtiauKiU*V
L'NION-. I« «>lll«(l b> Dr. J. A. Au-XN. wltH Uw AwlsUnc* «i Mr, KiuOtK ]il.
TttJUfit: — $3.txia .tear. Including pti«Ugt:, vtHcllj In nUtiuice. Sliijtk num.
tern. 1% c«iilt. Ttce in llonoriiry Kcllowa. and lo KhIIoiik. >leni1>vr*, ami
A<*oi:t<lr> 111 Ihe A' 0> Ki- tint in nrreuTS fnr iliiei.
fiubMciptioDs and Adveniicnienia nbould he oddrcund to 'TMB AUK<'
JO BovLsTQX Strkkt, CkUMincK, Mak«.. or lo WILLIAM DUTCHER.
Batinrx Mauavirr, 515 Makiuttah Aw, Nki» VcmK. N- V. Fonifti Sub-
•ctJben miv otfinin -Tit« Ave' IIirouBti GUKKKV AM) jACKSUK, i
l*AICHN(»TaH Row, LciMKlK,
Atl Bitlclca and eommuiilEatiaii* imeiided fnr pubUcalion cod all bnok> anJ
public* lioQB for notice, ilinuld t>c acni ta Di. ]. A. ALLEN, Americas Mlmum
OF NaTL-UAL Htf^TORV, CUNTBAl. PA"K. N*».» VttltK ClTV-
Miutiiwrinu fur Kfiieral nrtkUri .hogld nrach the cdltur a\ Icmi «(x nrckt
bciiifrthe uole uf the nanibcr fur xhlch Ibev oic liilemkij. ind manuiis-ipu
far 'General Nuie** and Rcornt I.Hcrninic'' aol iMcr ihan ihe lint nf iLi
inanlh praceding lh« dati: ol the nnmbcr In wtilcli it it ditircd they abd
II
l\r.
1
i«.|
;^V^^
.^,^wys^^^.^.
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11